Hyperfractionated radiation and chemotherapy for unresectable localized adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. The Gastrointestinal Tumor Study Group experience

Eighteen patients with unresectable localized adenocarcinoma of the pancreas were treated by a combination of chemotherapy plus hyperfractionated radiation therapy to the pancreas for 4080 cGy with an additional 960 cGy to the pancreatic tumor and a surrounding margin. One hundred and twenty cGy were given twice daily 4 to 6 hours apart. High-energy photon or electron beams were used with treatment planning based on computed tomographic (CT) scans. Patients were given chemotherapy in the form of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) at 350 mg/m2 on the first 3 and last 3 days of radiation therapy. On day 53, chemotherapy was given that included 600 mg/m2 IV of 5-FU, 1 gm/m2 of streptozotocin, and 10 mg/m2 IV of mitomycin C. The 5-FU and streptozotocin were repeated on days 60, 81, and 88, and the stretozotocin and mitomycin (SMF) cycles were repeated every 8 weeks until progression. Radiation toxicity was generally tolerable with one of 18 evaluable patients having severe nausea and vomiting and two of 18 patients having severe diarrhea. One patient had total liver failure and died 3 months after initiation of therapy. Six patients had severe hematopoietic toxicity during chemotherapy. Overall, the severe toxicity rate was higher (67%) than in previous studies. Median survival was 35 weeks, the 1-year survival rate was 39%, and the patient who survived the longest died at 68 months. Although this schedule of hyperfractionated radiation and chemotherapy was disappointing, combined experimental radiation approaches plus chemotherapy for localized unresectable adenocarcinoma of the pancreas deserve additional research.     

Cervical carcinoma metastatic to para-aortic nodes: extended field radiation therapy with concomitant 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin chemotherapy: a gynecologic oncology group study

Purpose: A multicenter trial of chemoradiation therapy to evaluate the feasibility of extended field radiation therapy (ERT) with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and cisplatin, and to determine the progression-free interval (PFI), overall survival (OS), and recurrence sites in patients with biopsy-confirmed para-aortic node metastases (PAN) from cervical carcinoma.

Methods and Materials: Ninety-five patients with cervical carcinoma and PAN metastases were entered and 86 were evaluable: Stage I—14, Stage II—40, Stage III—27, Stage IVA—5. Seventy-nine percent of the patients were followed for 5 or more years or died. ERT doses were 4500 cGy (PAN), 3960 cGy to the pelvis (Stages IB/IIB), and 4860 cGy to the pelvis (Stages IIIB/IVA). Point A intracavitary (IC) doses were 4000 cGy (Stages IB/IIB), and 3000 cGy (Stages IIIB/IVA). Point B doses were raised to 6000 cGy (ERT + IC) with parametrial boost. Concomitant chemotherapy consisted of 5-FU 1000 mg/m²/day for 96 hours and cisplatin 50 mg/m² in weeks 1 and 5.

Results: Eighty-five of 86 patients completed radiation therapy and 90% of patients completed both courses of chemotherapy. Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) grade 3–4 acute toxicity were gastrointestinal (18.6%) and hematologic (15.1%). Late morbidity actuarial risk of 14% at 4 years primarily involved the rectum. Initial sites of recurrence were pelvis alone, 20.9%; distant metastases only, 31.4%; and pelvic plus distant metastases, 10.5%. The 3-year OS and PFI rate were 39% and 34%, respectively, for the entire group. OS was Stage I—50%, Stage II—39%, and Stage III/IVA—38%.

Conclusions: Extended field radiation therapy with 5-FU and cisplatin chemotherapy was feasible in a multicenter clinical trial. PFI of 33% at 3 years suggests that a proportion of patients achieve control of advanced pelvic disease and that not all patients with PAN metastases have systemic disease. This points to the importance of assessment and treatment of PAN metastases.     

Preoperative chemotherapy and radiation for advanced esophageal carcinoma: comparison between once a day radiation and hyperfractionation,a single-institution experience

The purpose of this study was to determine the toxicity and efficacy of single daily fractionation as compared with twice-a-day radiation therapy in combination with chemotherapy for preoperative locally advanced thoracic esophageal carcinoma. A retrospective survey was done of 42 patients undergoing concurrent chemotherapy and radiation for preoperative locally advanced thoracic esophageal carcinoma. Twenty-five patients had 5-fluorouracil ([5-FU]), 1,000 mg/m2/d by continuous infusion, days 1-5, and days 22-26), cisplatin (100 mg/m2 intravenously, days 2 and 22), and radiation to a total dose of 4,500 to 5,040 cGy in 180 cGy/fraction every day. Seventeen patients received 5-FU (300 mg/m2/d by continuous infusion, days 1 and 21), cisplatin (20 mg/m2/d for 1 hour, days 1-5 and days 17-20), vinblastine (1 mg/m2 intravenously, days 1-5 and days 17-21) and accelerated hyperfractionated radiation 150 cGy twice a day to a total dose of 4,500 cGy. Response rate, survival, local regional failure rates, and treatment toxicity of the two groups were compared. Surgery was aborted in one patient and another patient refused surgery in the single daily-fractionation group. All patients underwent surgery in the twice-daily group. Complete response (CR) was noted in 12 patients (52%) in the single daily-fractionation group as compared with 9 patients (52%) in the twice-daily group. The median and 3-year survival were 20 months and 35%, respectively, in the single daily-fractionation group. Corresponding figures were 18 months and 32%, respectively, in the twice-daily group. For the 2 groups combined, a statistically significant improvement in survival was observed among blacks who achieved a CR (31 months) as compared with the ones with residual disease (13.5 months). Local and regional failures were 28% and 17%, respectively, for the single daily-fractionation and twice-daily groups. Distant metastases remained significant in both groups and were 36% (single daily-fractionation) and 41% (twice-daily), respectively. Grades III to IV esophagitis and hematologic toxicity developed in 36% and 64% of patients of the single daily-fractionation and twice-daily groups, respectively. The incidence of late complications was 16% (single daily-fractionation) and 11.7% (twice-daily). Preoperative chemotherapy and radiation is effective to achieve a high pathologic CR. Both radiation therapy fractionation schedules are comparable in efficacy and toxicity. Further investigations should be done to assess whether ethnicity may play a role in the prognosis of esophageal carcinoma.     

Phase I study of eniluracil, a dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase inactivator, and oral 5-fluorouracil with radiation therapy in patients with recurrent or advanced head and neck cancer.

5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) is an effective enhancer of radiation therapy (RT) in head and neck cancers. Due to rapid, predominantly hepatic metabolism by dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) and suggested clinical benefit from prolonged drug exposure, 5-FU is commonly given by continuous infusion. Eniluracil is a novel DPD-inactivator designed to prolong the half-life of 5-FU and provide sustained plasma concentrations of 5-FU with oral dosing. We conducted a Phase I study of the safety and efficacy of eniluracil given with oral 5-FU in patients receiving concurrent RT for recurrent or advanced squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck. Thirteen patients with recurrent, metastatic, or high-risk (defined as an expected 2-year survival rate of <10%) head and neck cancer were enrolled and treated with concomitant chemoradiotherapy on an every-other-week schedule. Eniluracil at a fixed dose [20 mg twice a day (BID)] was given for 7 consecutive days (days 1-7). 5-FU and RT were given on 5 consecutive days (days 2-6). One patient was treated with once-daily RT (2.0 Gy fractions). The remaining patients received hyperfractionated RT (1.5-Gy fractions BID). The initial dose of 5-FU was 2.5 mg/m2 given BID. Dose escalation in patient cohorts was scheduled at 2.5-mg/m2 increments, with intrapatient dose escalation permitted. Lymphocyte DPD activity and serum 5-FU and uracil concentrations were monitored during two cycles. DPD activity was completely or nearly completely inactivated in all patients. Sustained, presumed therapeutic concentrations of 5-FU were observed at a dose of 5.0 mg/m2 given BID. Cumulative dose-limiting myelosuppression (both neutropenia and thrombocytopenia) was observed during the fourth and fifth cycles following administration of 5.0 mg/m2 5-FU BID. One patient died of neutropenic sepsis during cycle 4. Other late cycle toxicities included diarrhea, fatigue, and mucositis. Grade 3 mucositis was observed in 4 patients, but no grade 4 mucositis or grade 3 or 4 dermatitis was observed. A second patient death occurred during cycle 1 of treatment. No specific cause of death was identified. The study was subsequently discontinued. Cumulative myelosupression was the significant dose-limiting toxicity of oral 5-FU given with the DPD-inactivator eniluracil on an every-other-week schedule. Clinical radiation sensitization was not observed, based on the absence of dose-limiting mucositis and dermatitis. Alternative dosing schedules need to be examined to determine the most appropriate use of eniluracil and 5-FU as radiation enhancers.     

Preliminary analysis of a phase II study of Paclitaxel and CHART in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb) is one of the most active single agents for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and ideal in combination with radiation therapy. We designed a phase II study to determine the efficacy and toxicity of continuous hyperfractionated accelerated radiotherapy (CHART) and concurrent weekly Paclitaxel (T) in good performance status patients with unresectable stage III A and B NSCLC. T (60 mg/m2) was given as a 3-h infusion on days 1, 8, 15, 22, 29 and 36; CHART was started on day 15 with 150 cGy/fraction given three times a day for a total dose of 54 Gy in 12 days with no weekend break. Twenty patients were evaluable for acute toxicity. The major acute toxicities were esophagitis and pulmonary toxicity; 70% of the patients experienced grade 2-3 esophagitis and 50% experienced grade > or = 3 pulmonary toxicity. Grade 3 anemia developed in only one patient. Of the 17 patients evaluable for late toxicity, 12% of the patients had grade 3 pulmonary toxicity, one patient developed grade 4 esophagitis. Nineteen patients were evaluable response. The overall response rate was 84% (95% confidence interval, 60-97). CHART with concurrent weekly T seems to be an effective regimen, but tolerability needs to be documented with a larger number of patients and longer follow-up.     

Neoadjuvant accelerated chemotherapy followed by hyperfractionated radiation therapy in patients with operable, locally advanced head and neck carcinoma

A prospective phase II trial was carried out to evaluate an accelerated chemotherapy (CT) regimen followed by hyperfractionated radiation therapy (RT) in previously untreated Stage III-IV, operable (total laryngectomy), head and neck cancer patients. The current study evaluates overall survival, loco-regional control, organ preservation rates and toxicity. Between April 1997 and December 2002, 68 patients with advanced head and neck cancer were treated with 3 cycles of induction CT (cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil; days 1, 14, and 28) followed by hyperfractionated RT (7440 cGy/62 fractions). Sixty patients received the planned RT-CT treatment. Two months after the end of RT, 96% of patients had a clinical complete remission of the primary and 66% of the neck disease. At a median follow-up of 32 months, the 3-year overall and disease-free survival rates were 66% and 76%, respectively. Seven patients recurred on the primary site, 1 on the neck and 2 patients only had distant metastases. The organ preservation rate was 73%. Acute grade 3-4 mucositis occurred in 75% of patients and an 18% rate of CT-related cardiotoxicity was reported. The accelerated CT-RT regimen achieves a high rate of larynx preservation albeit with considerable toxicity. The current prospective clinical trial was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Centro di Riferimento Oncologico (C.R.O.) on May 27, 1996, # CRO-02-96. Written informed consent was required from all patients entering the study.     

194 hepatocellular cancers treated by radiation and chemotherapy combinations: toxicity and response: a Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Study

Hepatocellular carcinoma is known to have a doubling time of approximately 41 days. This rapid cell division suggested that hyperfractionated radiation and chemotherapy might add an advantage in gaining remission of this malignancy. One hundred and thirty-five patients (70% with metastasis and/or previous treatment) were prospectively treated with single daily fractions to the liver (3.0 Gy external beam radiation, total dose 21.0 Gy), and chemotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma. The low dose chemotherapy used in conjunction with the radiation was 2 hr before treatment on days 1, 3, 5, and 7 and consisted of Adriamycin, 15 mg IV and 5-FU, 500 mg IV. These patients were compared to a second group of 59 patients (80% with metastases and/or previous treatment) treated using the same chemotherapy regimen but using hyperfractionated whole liver external beam irradiation (1.2 Gy twice daily, 4 hr between treatments, 5 days per week to 24.0 Gy, 10 MV photons). Response was determined by CT scan tumor volumetric analysis. The response rate for the single daily fraction patient group was 22% and for the new hyperfractionated group, 18% (p = 0.68). Toxicity was evaluated by RTOG criteria. The grade 4 hematologic toxicity noted in the daily fraction patient group was 6%. Among 59 patients treated with the hyperfractionated liver irradiation, 2% experienced grade 4 hematologic toxicity. Esophagitis occurred in 1% of patients in the standard fractionation group and 19% in the hyperfractionated group (p = 0.0001). Grade 1-4 thrombocytopenia occurred in 49% of patients in the conventional group and 68% in the hyperfractionated group (p = 0.03). Normal liver volume changes with treatment were measured with CT scan tumor volumetric analysis. The hyperfractionated group experienced a median of 11 cc increase in liver volume and the conventional group a 46 cc decrease, but the difference was not significant. Hyperfractionated radiation did not demonstrate a significant benefit over standard daily radiation, but acute toxicity appeared to be higher.     

Final report of Intergroup Trial 0122 (ECOG PE-289, RTOG 90-12): Phase II trial of neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus concurrent chemotherapy and high-dose radiation for squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus

PURPOSE: To determine the outcome of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemotherapy plus high-dose radiation therapy in patients with local/regional squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Forty-five patients with clinical Stage T1-4N0-1M0 squamous cell carcinoma were entered on a prospective single-arm study, of which 38 were eligible. Patients received 3 monthly cycles of 5-FU (1000 mg/m2/24 h x 5 days) and cisplatin (100 mg/m2 day 1; neoadjuvant segment) followed by 2 additional monthly cycles of 5-FU (1000 mg/m2/24 h x 5 days) and cisplatin (75 mg/m2 day 1) plus concurrent 6480 cGy (combined modality segment). The median follow-up in surviving patients was 59 months. RESULTS: For the 38 eligible patients, the primary tumor response rate was 47% complete, 8% partial, and 3% stable disease. The first site of clinical failure was 39% local/regional and 24% distant. For the total patient group, there were 6 deaths during treatment, of which 9% (4/45) were treatment related. The median survival was 20 months. Actuarial survival at 3 years was 30%, and at 5 years, 20%. CONCLUSION: This intensive neoadjuvant approach does not appear to offer a benefit compared with conventional doses and techniques of combined modality therapy. However, high dose radiation (6480 cGy) appears to be tolerable, and is being tested further in Intergroup Trial INT 0123.     

Angiosarcoma of the forearm definitively treated by hyperfractionated irradiation

A case report of an angiosarcoma treated definitively with hyperfractionated irradiation is presented. Radial and ulnar aspects of the proximal forearm, wrist, and digits were diffusely involved on angiography. Hyperfractionated irradiation totaling 7,440 cGy was delivered to the entire circumference of the hand, forearm, and distal 5 cm of the arm; a confluent dry erythema without moist desquamation was observed at completion of therapy. No significant local or systemic toxicity was noted with the administration of an Adriamycin-containing adjuvant chemotherapy regimen following irradiation. Local regional control at 2 years is documented both clinically and by angiographic examination and the patient otherwise is free of disease. Function remains excellent with no lymphedema or joint fibrosis observed and grip strength of treated and untreated hands is comparable at 35 pounds. For patients refusing amputation or who are otherwise inoperable, hyperfractionated irradiation provides a therapeutic option.     

Testicular seminoma. Results of the Yale University experience, 1964-1984

Eighty-three testicular seminoma patients were treated with radiation therapy from 1964 through 1984. Seventy-nine (95%) of the 83 patients had early disease that included 61 Stage I, 15 Stage IIA (pelvic or paraaortic lymph node involvement less than or equal to 5 cm), and 3 Stage IIB (pelvic or paraaortic lymph node involvement greater than 5 cm) patients. The 15-year actuarial survival for this group of Stage I and II patients was 95% (+/- 5%). Stage I patients were treated with a mean paraaortic/pelvic dose of 2924 cGy and only one patient developed recurrent disease. This recurrence was at the margin of the radiation field and probably represents a marginal miss. The Stage IIA patients were treated with slightly higher doses (mean, 3335 cGY) to the paraaortic/pelvic region and there were no recurrences. The three Stage IIB patients received tumor doses of 3245 cGy, 4090 cGy, and 4500 cGy, respectively, and there were no recurrences. Low dose prophylactic mediastinal and supraclavicular irradiation (mean, 2320 cGy) was used in 17 (94%) of the 18 Stage II patients and there were no mediastinal or supraclavicular recurrences. Four patients presented with advanced disease (one Stage III, three Stage IV) and the only disease-free survivor was treated with cisplatinum-based combination chemotherapy and radiation therapy. Three patients developed minor complications from the radiation therapy: one patient had persistent scrotal and leg edema and two patients treated with prophylactic mediastinal irradiation had chronic low leukocyte counts. Two of the 79 Stage I and II patients developed a second malignancy: one had bronchogenic carcinoma at the margin of a mediastinal field, and one had diffuse histiocytic lymphoma both in and out of the radiation therapy fields. The 15-year actuarial probability of developing a second malignancy was 3.3%. Radiation therapy after operation is a successful treatment option for most patients with Stage I and II seminoma.     

Quality of life with functional pharyngeal preservation in advanced carcinomas of the base tongue complex using an integrated trimodality approach.

Standard management of advanced carcinoma arising from the base of the tongue or infiltrating that region from contiguous areas (henceforth referred to as base of tongue complex [BTC] tumors) with radical surgery and postoperative radiation therapy results in extensive loss of function affecting deglutition, speech, and physical appearance. From January 1995, 16 patients with advanced stage BTC tumors were entered in this phase II study. Eleven patients (74%) had N2-3 neck disease. To optimize neck control, those with clinical N+ nodes at presentation had neck dissection. This was followed by hyperfractionated radiotherapy at 120 cGy twice daily to a median dose of 7,320 cGy to the primary and 6,240 cGy to areas with pathologically positive nodes. Concomitant chemotherapy was administered during weeks 1 and 4 of the radiation therapy using bolus cisplatin 75 to 100 mg/m2 on day 1 and continuous infusional 5-fluorouracil 750 to 1,000 mg/m2/d from days 1 to 4 of each chemotherapy cycle. Survival curves were plotted for various events, using actuarial life table methods. A functional assessment was made at least 1 year after completion of treatment using a previously validated Head/Neck Performance Status Scale. The median follow-up period was 23 months. There was a 100% complete response to the treatment at the primary site. The actuarial 4-year local (primary site) control was 100%, locoregional control (including nodes) was 69%, and disease-specific survival was 70% at 4 years. The predominant acute toxicity (63% incidence) was reversible grade III mucositis resulting in a median of 9 days' interruption in treatment. All of the patients were able to complete the prescribed treatment course, and there were no treatment-related deaths. Quality of Life assessment after treatment examined all facets of oropharyngeal function. Of note, none of the patients required long-term tube feedings. For the nine patients who responded to the functional assessment questionnaire, the results were excellent (score >75). The mean score for ability to eat in public was 75, mean of 76 for normalcy of diet, and 91 for understandability of speech. Concomitant hyperfractionated chemoradiation therapy produced excellent functional preservation with good long-term control in this patient group with historically poor prognosis. A 4-year actuarial local control rate of 69% was obtained, which is comparable to results of radical surgery and adjuvant radiation therapy. Further studies with modifications of fractionation and use of newer chemotherapy agents/radioprotectors will improve on these gains while reducing toxicity.     

Phase I study of hyperfractionated radiation therapy with protracted 5-fluorouracil infusion in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer

OBJECTIVE: This study investigated the maximum-tolerated dose of hyperfractionated radiation therapy with protracted 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) infusion in patients with locally advanced, unresectable pancreatic cancer. METHODS: Five cohorts of patients were scheduled to receive escalating doses of hyperfractionated radiation therapy (range, 45.6-64.8 Gy). All patients received two fractions of 1.2 Gy each (separated by 6 h) per day for 5 days a week, and received protracted 5-FU infusion (200 mg/m2/day) during the radiation course. The maximum-tolerated dose was defined as one dose level below the dose at which more than one third of 3-6 patients experienced dose-limiting toxicity. RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients were enrolled in this study. The most common toxicities were nausea/vomiting and anorexia. Although 1 patient developed bleeding from a gastric ulcer 3 months after the completion of chemoradiotherapy, the maximum-tolerated dose was not reached even at the highest dose level (level 5, 64.8 Gy). The median survival time was 12.2 months and the 1-year survival rate was 55.0%. CONCLUSION: The toxicity associated with our regimen was tolerable up to dose level 5 (64.8 Gy). We are currently conducting a phase II study of this hyperfractionated radiation therapy with protracted 5-FU infusion at a dose of 64.8 Gy.     

Concomitant 5-FU, hydroxyurea and cisplatin with external beam radiation therapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer

The aim of the study was to determine the efficacy and toxicity of alternate week concurrent 5-fluorouracil, hydroxyurea, and cisplatin with radiotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Patients received 5-fluorouracil, hydroxyurea and cisplatin with radiotherapy on an alternate week basis. Chemoradiotherapy was given day 1-5, and no therapy given day 6-14 for each 14 day cycle. Chemotherapy doses were as follows: hydroxyurea 1 mg every 12 h starting day 0, 5-fluorouracil 800 mg/m(2)/day for 5 days starting day 1, and cisplatin 20 mg/m(2) daily for 5 days every other cycle. A radiation dose of 6000 cGy was prescribed. Acute toxicities were monitored and therapy modified for hematologic toxicity. Nine patients enrolled, however eight were evaluable; one patient expired prior to therapy. The median radiation dose delivered was 5540 cGy. Sixty-three percent required a chemotherapy dose reduction. Fifty percent achieved local control by radiographic imaging after completion of therapy. Median survival was 12 months. Acute toxicity included: 38% grade 2-3 nausea, 37% grade 2-3 vomiting, 63% grade 2-3 mucositis, 63% grade 2-3 neutropenia, and 88% grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia. Other sequelae included hand-foot syndrome, deep venous thrombosis, hearing loss, seizures, and anorexia. Patients achieved the same median survival as compared to other reported studies of radiation therapy with single agent 5-fluorouracil. We do not recommend this protocol due to the significant toxicity. Future studies to incorporate conformal radiation therapy with more active, less toxic chemotherapeutic agents should be investigated.     

Neoadjuvant hyperfractionated-accelerated radiotherapy with concomitant chemotherapy in esophageal cancer: phase II study

Purpose

Concomitant use of chemotherapy and a radiation dose schedule that is more efficient compared to conventional radiotherapy may provide better outcomes in patients with esophageal cancer. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and tolerability of neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy and hyperfractionated accelerated radiotherapy regimen in this group of patients.

Methods and materials

A total of 20 newly diagnosed treatment-naïve esophageal cancer patients were included in the study. Neoadjuvant cisplatin and 5-FU were given with 28-day intervals in a total of three courses. Along with the third course of chemotherapy, hyperfractionated accelerated radiotherapy (HART) was given with the following dose schedule: 5760 cGy/36 fr/16 day.

Results

All patients could receive the planned RT dose of 5760 cGy. Odynophagia was the most frequent grade III acute toxicity (50%). None of the acute toxicity reactions required treatment discontinuation. Grade III or higher subacute/late toxicity occurred in 10 patients (75%) including 5 deaths, mostly esophageal. Radiologically, 8 patients (40%) had complete response, 8 (40%) had partial response, and 3 (15%) had stable disease, with only 1 patient (5%) having progressive disease. Seven patients underwent surgery. Overall, 8 patients (40%) had local control. The 5 years overall survival rate was 38.1%.

Conclusions

Neoadjuvant hyperfractionated accelerated radiotherapy plus chemotherapy may help to target local disease control and increase survival in patients with esophageal cancer. Further studies to improve neoadjuvant and radical chemoradiotherapy dose schedules are warranted for maximum tumor control rates with minimal toxicity.Key Words: Neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy, esophageal cancer, hyperfractionated-accelerated radiotherapy, toxicity, safety     

Concurrent weekly docetaxel and concomitant boost radiation therapy in the treatment of locally advanced squamous cell cancer of the head and neck

PURPOSE: In a Phase I/II trial, we investigated concurrent weekly docetaxel and concomitant boost radiation in patients with locally advanced squamous cell cancer of the head and neck (SCCHN) after induction chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients presented with American Joint Committee on Cancer Stage III/IV and were treated initially with induction chemotherapy using cisplatinum/5-fluorouracil (PF), carboplatinum-5-FU, or docetaxel-PF. Patients then received docetaxel four times weekly with concomitant boost (CB) radiation (1.8 Gy once-daily X20, 1.8/1.5 Gy twice a day). Fifteen patients each received 20 mg/M2 and 25 mg/M2. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients were enrolled and 30 were evaluable for response and toxicity. Median follow-up was 42 months (range, 27-63 months). Primary sites were: oropharynx 19, oral cavity 2, larynx/hypopharynx 5, and unknown primary 4. Eighty-seven percent of patients had N2/N3 disease; 60% had T3/T4 disease. Twenty percent of patients had a complete response (CR) to induction chemotherapy. After chemoradiotherapy, 21 of 30 patients had a CR, 2 had progressive disease, and 7 had partial response (PR). Nineteen of 26 patients presenting with neck disease had neck dissections, and 7 of 19 were positive. Ninety-three percent of all patients were rendered disease-free after all planned therapy. Treatment failed in 8 patients, and 7 have died of disease. An additional patient died with no evidence of disease. Twenty-one patients (70%) are currently alive with no evidence of disease. No acute dose-limiting toxicity was observed at either dose level. CONCLUSIONS: This intensive treatment regimen of concurrent docetaxel/concomitant boost radiation and surgery after induction chemotherapy in poor prognosis patients yields good local regional control and survival. Docetaxel/CB chemoradiotherapy represents an aggressive alternative regimen to platinum-based chemoradiotherapy or surgery in patients who have a poor response to induction chemotherapy.     

Combined radiation and chemotherapy as primary management of adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction

Between January 1981 and December 1986, 20 patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction were entered into a prospective study involving combined radiation therapy and chemotherapy (5-fluorouracil [5-FU] and mitomycin) as primary management. Nine patients with Stage I or II disease received definitive treatment consisting of 6000 cGy in 6 to 7 weeks and 5-FU (1000 mg/m2/24 hours) as a continuous intravenous (IV) infusion for 96 hours starting on days 2 and 29. Mitomycin (10 mg/m2) was administered as a bolus injection on day 2. Ten patients with extraesophageal and disseminated disease (Stages III and IV) and one patient with an unresectable anastomotic recurrence were considered palliative. Generally the palliative regimen did not differ from the definitive except for the radiation dose which in seven of the 11 patients was less than 6000 cGy (4000-5600 cGy). The range of follow-up was 6 to 74 months and no patient was lost to follow-up. Seven of the eight evaluable definitively treated patients were complete responders. The median relapse-free survival was 10 months and the median survival was 15 months in this group. In the palliative group, six of nine evaluable patients had relief of dysphagia until death or last follow-up with a median duration of 8 months. Our results indicate that combined modality treatment with infusional 5-FU, mitomycin, and radiation is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction. This treatment regimen offers palliation and some chance for cure to those patients who are inoperable, unresectable, or who refuse surgery.     

Adjuvant chemotherapy for high-risk squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck

A prospective clinical trial was developed to evaluate efficacy, toxicity, and patient compliance to adjuvant chemotherapy following surgery and postoperative radiation therapy in patients with squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck with extracapsular spread of tumor in cervical metastases. Following postoperative radiation therapy, 18 courses of methotrexate (MTX) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) were administered over 6 months. Fifty patients were registered. A total of 771 doses were administered. Dose reduction was required 72 times. Therapy was stopped in one patient (2%) because of toxicity. Three patients (6%) refused to complete the adjuvant therapy. Adjusted 2-year no evidence of disease (NED) survival is 66%. This study demonstrates that patients with advanced squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck can undertake an aggressive program of adjuvant MTX/5-FU with acceptable compliance and toxicities. Preliminary data generated in this nonrandomized study support the call for a prospective randomized multiinstitutional trial of this program.     

Large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the lung: pathological study and clinical outcome of 18 resected cases

We investigated a risk of developing radiation myelitis during four prospective studies using hyperfractionated radiation therapy (HFX RT) with and without concurrent chemotherapy (CHT) during which a portion of thoracic spinal cord received a dose > or = 50.4 Gy given via 1.2 Gy b.i.d. fractionation. Of 536 patients with Stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) which were treated on three prospective randomised Phase III studies and one Phase II study, 336 patients received irradiation dose > or = 50.4 Gy to a portion of their spinal cord and survived >1 year after the beginning of therapy. None of these 336 patients developed thoracic radiation myelitis. Therefore, the influence of potentially contributing factors on the occurrence of radiation myelitis, such as cord length, interfraction interval, or administration of concurrent CHT was not possible to investigate. These results give new insight about the influence of total dose/dose per fraction/interfraction interval with or without concurrent CHT on the thoracic spinal cord toxicity.     

Phase I and pharmacologic study of 72-hour infused 5-fluorouracil and hyperfractionated cyclical radiation

We have studied 21 patients infused for 72 hours with 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) at progressive doses combined with hyperfractionated radiation. The schedule was chosen as being one capable of inducing 5-FU radiosensitization (RS). All patients were started at a daily 5-FU dose of 40 mg/kg/24 hours; doses were then escalated with each subsequent treatment cycle to limiting toxicity or until taken off study. Patients received between one and six infusion cycles. Every treatment cycle included coincident hyperfractionated radiation to various body areas including the abdomen, chest, and head and neck region. Radiation fractionation was invariant; 1,000 rad were delivered in four equal fractions. Two fractions of 250 rad each were given on days 1 and 2 of each three day 5-FU cycle, i.e. at approximately 0, 8, 24, and 32 hours into the drug infusion. Patients were followed for toxicity; serum 5-FU concentrations were determined using a high pressure liquid chromatographic assay. 5-FU clearances were calculated from the mean serum drug levels and the infused drug dose. The toxicity spectrum was not found to be significantly different from infused drug alone in this dose range save when the head and neck region received coincident irradiation. In that region the two anticipated toxicities combined in what appears to be a synergistic fashion to enhance mucositis. Most toxicities including gastrointestinal and bone marrow appeared dependent on the mean serum 5-FU level as did mucositis itself. 5-FU clearance was found to be non-linear in this dose region but did not appear influenced by radiation to any part of the body. This study shows that 72-hour infused 5-FU can be combined with external beam radiation and will produce reasonably predictable toxicity patterns which depend on the region of the body being irradiated. 5-FU toxicity correlates with mean serum drug level which is itself dependent on 5-FU clearance. Minor variations in 5-FU clearance therefore probably contribute to the natural range found in the dose-response relationship for infused 5-FU toxicities. Future studies should integrate this understanding of 5-FU pharmacokinetics into treatment regimens. The combination of infused 5-FU and coincident radiation appears useful in treating several tumor types, particularly squamous and squamous-like cancers. However, further scheduling and radiation fractionation studies are desirable to optimize 5-FU RS in man and to quantify late effects.     

Toxicity profile and clinical outcomes in locally advanced head and neck cancer patients treated with induction chemotherapy prior to concurrent chemoradiation

The use of induction chemotherapy prior to chemoradiation for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LA-HNSCC) remains controversial. We explored whether toxicity from induction chemotherapy influenced the delivery of concurrent chemoradiation. Among 171 consecutive previously unirradiated patients with HNSCC treated with combined chemotherapy and radiation, we identified 66 patients with stage III-IVB head and neck carcinoma who were treated with induction chemotherapy prior to planned chemoradiation. The most common induction regimen was docetaxel, cisplatin and 5-FU (TPF; 80%) for 2 to 3 cycles. Mean radiation dose was 72 Gy (range, 36-75 Gy). Concurrent chemotherapy regimens included cisplatin (26%), cetuximab (5%) and 5-fluorouracil/hydroxyurea (65%)-based regimens. At a median follow-up of 27 months (range, 9-56 months), the 2-year locoregional control and distant control rates were 85 and 86%, respectively. The 2-year disease-free survival and overall survival rates were 74 and 80%, respectively. Although there were no grade 5 toxicities during induction chemotherapy, 26% of patients required hospitalization for adverse events, including 5% needing intensive care. The most common high grade adverse events were grade 4 neutropenia (21%) and neutropenic fever (17%). Six percent of patients were unable to tolerate concurrent chemotherapy. The 2-year disease-free survival was significantly higher in patients able to complete induction and concurrent chemoradiation as planned (83 vs. 27%, p<0.001). Induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiation results in promising survival rates in our cohort of advanced head and neck carcinoma patients. Due to severe toxicities in a subset of patients, this strategy is only recommended in selected high-risk patients who are carefully followed by an experienced multidisciplinary team.