甲状腺细针穿刺并发症

甲状腺细针穿刺因其准确性、效价比高,逐渐成为临床广泛采用的诊断方法之一,是甲状腺结节术前诊断的首选方法之一。甲状腺细针穿刺可以大大减少不必要手术及手术后致残率、致死率。甲状腺细针穿刺引起的常见并发症为穿刺后局部疼痛和出血,且穿刺后并发症可以自行愈合,而严重并发症少     

Diagnosing sarcoidosis using endosonography-guided fine-needle aspiration

STUDY OBJECTIVES: The ability to diagnose sarcoidosis cytologically has been reported previously, but the method is rarely used. Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) is a sensitive technique for detecting mediastinal lymph nodes, which in addition provides an opportunity to carry out guided fine-needle aspiration (FNA) cytology. We report herein on the use of EUS-FNA in the diagnosis of sarcoidosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Nineteen patients with suspected sarcoidosis were investigated using EUS-FNA with a linear echoendoscope and a 22-gauge Hancke-Vilman needle. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: In all 19 patients, EUS revealed enlarged mediastinal lymph nodes (mean size, 2.4 cm), located subcarinally (n = 15), in the aortopulmonary window (n = 12), or in the lower posterior mediastinum (n = 5). The nodes had an isoechoic or hypoechoic appearance, with atypical vessels in five cases. The amount of aspirate obtained using EUS-FNA was adequate in all patients, and contained blood in excess of normal in some, indicating a high degree of vascularity. Cytology demonstrated epithelioid cell granuloma formation, suggesting sarcoidosis. Mycobacterial cultures were negative in all of the patients except one, in whom the final diagnosis was tuberculosis. The specificity and sensitivity of EUS-FNA in the diagnosis of sarcoidosis were 94% and 100%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: EUS of mediastinal lymph nodes in sarcoidosis reveals certain characteristic features. However, it is not capable of differentiating the lesions from tuberculosis or malignancy. EUS-FNA is a safe and sensitive method of aspirating material for cytology and mycobacterial cultures. We believe it will provide a useful alternative in the diagnosis of sarcoidosis.     

Nondiagnostic thyroid fine-needle aspiration cytology: management dilemmas.

Approximately 10% to 20% of thyroid biopsies by fine-needle aspiration (FNA) are nondiagnostic. The management of thyroid nodules in which FNA is nondiagnostic remains controversial because few studies have addressed this issue. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 153 patients with nondiagnostic FNAs of the thyroid performed in 1994. Sixty patients had reaspiration biopsies performed. Thirty-seven specimens (62%) were diagnostic and 23 (38%) remained nondiagnostic. Of the 27 patients who had a thyroid operation, 10 (37%) had a malignancy. Preoperative information about physical examination, ultrasound imaging, or nondiagnostic FNA did not predict outcome. Nondiagnostic FNAs of the thyroid may be associated with a high probability of thyroid malignancy. Nondiagnostic FNAs should not be considered benign. Reaspiration followed by selective surgical treatment is recommended.     

Management of cystic or predominantly cystic thyroid nodules: the role of ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy.

OBJECTIVE: Conventional fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) for cystic thyroid nodules (CTNs) has a high rate of nondiagnostic and false-negative results. Ultrasound-guided FNAB (UG-FNAB) permits direct sampling of the wall and/or the solid portion of CTNs, increasing the possibility of a representative sample. In this study we evaluated the role of UG-FNAB in CTNs management. METHODS: Five-hundred-seventy-five UG-FNAB of CTNs were performed. Thyroidectomy was carried out in 119 of these cases. The medical records of these 119 patients were reviewed and form the basis of this report. RESULTS: The nondiagnostic smear rate was 9.2%. Cytological diagnosis was benign nodule in 42 cases, predominantly follicular lesion in 50 cases, and suspicious or malignant lesion in 16 cases. The final pathology revealed a benign nodule in 98 cases (82.4%) and a carcinoma in 21 (17.6%). The overall accuracy of UG-FNAB was 88.0%. No significant differences were found in age, sex, lesion size, or echographic pattern (p = NS) comparing patients with benign CTNs to patients with malignant CTNs. CONCLUSION: UG-FNAB has a low rate of nondiagnostic smears and a high overall accuracy in CTNs. All CTNs should undergo UG-FNAB to select patients for surgery, since the malignancy rate is not negligible and no clinical parameter can reliably predict it.     

Assessment of complications of EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration

BACKGROUND: EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) permits both morphologic and cytologic analysis of lesions within or adjacent to the GI tract. Despite increasing use of this technique, the safety and overall complication rates remain poorly defined. METHODS: During a period of 20 months, 322 consecutive patients underwent EUS-FNA in 2 centers. All procedures were performed with the patients under general anesthesia. All complications (including local complications resulting from endoscopy/aspiration or clinical complications after the procedure) were evaluated. Potential risk factors for the development of complications were also analyzed including site and nature of the lesion, presence of portal hypertension, and number of needle passes. RESULTS: A total of 345 lesions were aspirated in 322 patients. EUS-FNA involved the pancreas in 248 cases. Pancreatic lesions included solid (134) and cystic (114) types, which required a mean of 2.5 and 1.4 needle passes, respectively. Complications were observed in 4 (1.2%) patients after aspiration of pancreatic cystic lesions (acute pancreatitis, n = 3; aspiration pneumonia, n = 1) and all cases of pancreatitis resulted from FNA of lesions in the head/uncinate process. No complications resulted from FNA of solid pancreatic lesions. Complications were not observed after FNA of lymph nodes (n = 62) and one case of aspiration pneumonia was observed after FNA of a stromal tumor. EUS-FNA was performed without complication in 16 patients (5%) with portal hypertension. The number of needle passes was not predictive of complications. CONCLUSIONS: Because the overall risk of complications from EUS-FNA was relatively low (1.6%) with no severe or fatal incidents and although the risk appears slightly higher than that for standard EUS alone, the safety of EUS-FNA appears acceptable based on this analysis from an experienced center.     

Comparison of palpation-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy to ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy in the evaluation of thyroid nodules.

OBJECTIVE: Although fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) of thyroid nodules is a reliable and simple method, the diagnostic value may be limited by inadequate and false-negative results. In this prospective study, we compared palpation-guided FNAB (PGFNAB) with ultrasound-guided FNAB (UGFNAB) to establish the rates of inadequate material and cost-effectiveness. DESIGN: A total of 285 thyroid nodules in 215 patients were included in the study. Palpable nodules with the greatest diameter between 1 and 2.5 cm were included in the study. PGFNAB and UGFNAB techniques were applied to the same nodule by the same operator. Cytologic evaluations were performed by the same cytologist in a blinded fashion. To provide cost analysis, the prices obtained from different hospitals were evaluated. MAIN OUTCOME: The rates of inadequate material for PGFNAB and UGFNAB were significantly different as 32.3% and 21.4%, respectively (p = 0.004). There was significantly higher inadequate material rate in PGFNAB group for small-sized nodules (greatest nodule diameter between 10 and 15 mm) (p = 0.009), despite inadequate material rate was not significant for both procedures for larger sized nodules. False-negative results were 15.8% for PGFNAB and 5.6% for UGFNAB. Regarding cost analysis, the difference between the two methods was 20 dollars on average for each patient. CONCLUSIONS: We consider UGFNAB to be superior to PGFNAB for obtaining adequate material especially for small-sized nodules, as well as providing more accurate cytologic evaluation. Indeed, the difference between the costs of two procedures might be acceptable.     

Transcutaneous fine-needle aspiration biopsy of pancreatic cancer

Transcutaneous fine-needle aspiration (FNA) biopsies were performed on 30 patients with space-occupying lesions in the pancreas. Patient selection for FNA was based on pancreatic lesions suspected of malignancy by clinical and/or radiologic imaging methods. Patients with obstructive jaundice were excluded because of the necessity of laparotomy to relieve biliary obstruction. Of these 30 cases, 15 cases were positive for malignant cells. Of these 15 positive cases, 11 were adenocarcinomas of duct cell origin, one cystadenocarcinoma, one islet cell tumor, one lymphoma, and one metastatic malignant melanoma. The remaining 15 cases, negative for malignant cells, were ultimately shown to have the following lesions: five adenocarcinomas of the pancreas, one metastatic carcinoma from the breast, and nine nonneoplastic disease. Overall diagnostic accuracy was 80%. The sensitivity, specificity, and predictivity for positive FNA biopsy of pancreatic malignancy were 79, 100, and 100%, respectively. Cytologic features with corresponding histologic types were presented. Immunocytochemical and electron microscopic studies were performed on some cases. Only one complication that was possibly related to FNA biopsy occurred. In conclusion, transcutaneous FNA biopsy of pancreatic malignancy is highly valuable in patient management.     

Percutaneous fine-needle aspiration biopsy of the mediastinum

Percutaneous needle aspiration biopsy of the mediastinum has become a safe and reliable diagnostic technique that can decrease the need for mediastinoscopy in a large number of cases. It is particularly useful in detecting metastatic carcinoma, but it can also be helpful in the diagnosis of a number of other mediastinal lesions including thymoma, lymphoma, and cysts. Experience with the procedure and good cytopathological interpretation are important to the success of the procedure.     

Best practices in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration

Over the past 2 decades, endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration has evolved to become an indispensable tool for tissue acquisition in patients with gastrointestinal tumors. The technique is useful for biopsy of mucosal and submucosal lesions in which prior endoscopic biopsies have been nondiagnostic; to sample peri-intestinal structures such as lymph nodes; and to sample masses in the pancreas, liver, adrenal glands, gallbladder, and bile duct. Also, with the advent of neoadjuvant therapies for diseases such as pancreatic cancer, most patients require a tissue diagnosis before initiating treatment. This review provides a perspective on technical issues that are key for best practices in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration.     

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in pulmonary medicine

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration has significantly increased the capacity of pulmonary diagnostic procedures. Since this method was introduced, 1212 examinations have been performed at two centres of pulmonary medicine. Data on indications, procedures, findings, diagnostic yield and complications have been recorded. This paper describes the experiences thus gained regarding the possibilities and limitations of the method and assesses the current significance of the technique in pulmonary medicine according to previous studies. In primary diagnosis of mediastinal tissue alterations and in staging of malignant diseases the method offers a low-complication diagnostic measure which has a seminal impact on therapy in many cases, even though in daily practise the diagnostic accuracy of published studies is not always attained.     

Ultrasound-assisted transthoracic biopsy: fine-needle aspiration or cutting-needle biopsy?

The present study compared the diagnostic yield of ultrasound-assisted cutting-needle biopsy (CNB) and fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) in chest lesions. A physician performed ultrasound and FNAB with a 22-G spinal needle in all patients, directly followed by a 14-G CNB in patients without contraindication. A total of 155 consecutive lesions arising from the lung (74%), pleura (12%), mediastinum (11%) or chest wall (3%) in patients with a final diagnosis of lung carcinoma (74%), other malignant tumours (12%), non-neoplastic disease (9%) or unknown (5%) were prospectively included. The overall diagnostic yield was 87%. Combined specimens were obtained in 123 lesions (79%). In these, yields of FNAB, CNB and both methods combined were 82, 76 and 89%, respectively. FNAB was significantly better than CNB in lung carcinoma (95 versus 81%) but CNB was superior in noncarcinomatous tumours and in benign lesions. On-site cytology was 90% sensitive and 100% specific for predicting a positive FNAB. One patient required drainage for pneumothorax (0.6%). Ultrasound-assisted fine-needle aspiration biopsy performed by chest physicians is an accurate and safe initial diagnostic procedure in patients with a high clinical probability of lung carcinoma. All other patients should undergo concurrent fine-needle aspiration biopsy and cutting-needle biopsy.     

Detection of pancreatic metastases by EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration

BACKGROUND: Metastases to the pancreas are usually found incidentally. Tissue diagnosis is imperative because imaging alone is incapable of differentiating them from primary pancreatic tumors. This study tested whether it is possible to differentiate metastases from other focal pancreatic lesions by using EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) for cytodiagnosis. METHODS: One hundred fourteen consecutive patients (mean age 61 years) with focal pancreatic masses, detected on CT, underwent EUS-FNA by using a linear-array echoendoscope and 22-gauge needles. RESULTS: Adequate specimens were obtained from 112 lesions. Carcinomas were identified in 68 cases (60.7%), 56 (50%) of pancreatic origin and 12 (10.7%) from distant primary tumors. The metastases were all located in the head and body of the pancreas and measured 1.8 to 4.0 cm. The echo-texture was heterogeneous or hypoechoic in all cases and resembled that of primary tumors. Six of the 12 patients with metastatic disease had a prior diagnosis of cancer (breast, 3; renal cell, 2; salivary gland, 1), 4 of them with a recurrence and 2 with a second carcinoma metastasizing to the pancreas. Six patients without a prior diagnosis of cancer had metastases from renal cell, colonic, ovarian, and esophageal carcinomas; one metastasis was from an unknown primary and another was from a malignant lymphoma. These findings influenced the therapeutic strategy in 8 patients who underwent nonsurgical palliation. There were no complications. CONCLUSIONS: Pancreatic metastasis is an important cause of focal pancreatic lesions, but the EUS features are not diagnostic. Simultaneous EUS-FNA allows cytodiagnosis and can have a decisive influence on the selection of appropriate therapeutic strategies.