Non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome in patients with renal dysfunction: benefit of low-molecular-weight heparin alone or with glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors on outcomes. The Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events.

AIMS: To determine whether low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH)+glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitors provide greater benefit than unfractionated heparin (UFH)+GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors, irrespective of renal status. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients in the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) were divided into three groups according to creatinine clearance (CrCl): normal renal function (CrCl >60 mL/min), moderate renal dysfunction (30相似文献   

Bivalirudin in PCI: an overview of the REPLACE-2 trial

The Randomized Evaluation in PCI Linking Angiomax to Reduced Clinical Events (REPLACE)-2 trial is one of the largest acute randomized controlled trials evaluating the efficacy of two anticoagulant strategies during contemporary urgent or elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The direct thrombin inhibitor, bivalirudin, with provisional use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa (GP IIb/IIIa) inhibitor was compared to low-dose unfractionated heparin (UFH) plus planned GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor. At 30-day follow-up, the primary quadruple composite endpoint (death, myocardial infarction (MI), urgent repeat revascularization, or in-hospital major bleeding) occurred in 9.2% of patients in the bivalirudin group versus 10.0% of patients in the UFH plus GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor group. The secondary triple composite endpoint (death, MI, urgent repeat revascularization) occurred in 7.6% of patients in the bivalirudin group compared with 7.1% of patients in the UFH plus GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor group. Both endpoints met formal statistical criteria for noninferiority to UFH plus GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor. By imputed comparison from historic GP IIb/IIIa trials between bivalirudin versus UFH alone, REPLACE-2 demonstrated that bivalirudin was superior to UFH alone with respect to the quadruple and triple composite endpoints. Furthermore, bivalirudin plus provisional GP IIb/IIIa blockade was associated with a significant reduction in in-hospital bleeding (2.4% vs. 4.1%; p < 0.001). At 6 months' follow-up, there was no significant difference in rates of death, MI, or revascularization between the two groups. Furthermore, there was no evidence that the early, nonsignificant 0.5% excess non-Q-wave MI in the bivalirudin group translated into later mortality. There was a trend toward decreased mortality at 6 months in the bivalirudin arm (0.95% vs. 1.35%; p = 0.148). The relative efficacy of bivalirudin versus UFH plus GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor was similar in several high-risk subgroups, including patients with diabetes mellitus or prior MI, women, the elderly (age > 65 years), and patients undergoing PCI of bypass grafts. Bivalirudin represents an exciting alternative to UFH plus GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor in patients undergoing urgent and elective PCI with similar suppression of ischemic events, fewer bleeding complications, and the potential for greater cost savings and ease of administration.     

Renal insufficiency increases mortality in acute coronary syndromes regardless of TIMI risk score

BACKGROUND: Non ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE ACS) are the most frequent cause of admission to intensive care units. Early risk assessment and implementation of optimal treatment are of special importance in these patients. Previous studies have demonstrated that renal insufficiency is an independent risk factor in patients with cardiovascular disease. AIM: To assess the effects of renal function on the course of treatment and prognosis in patients with NSTE ACS admitted to hospitals without on-site invasive facilities but with a possibility of immediate transfer to a reference centre with a catheterisation laboratory. METHODS: Twenty-nine community hospitals without on-site invasive facilities participated in the Krakow Registry of Acute Coronary Syndromes - a prospective, multicentre, web-based, observational registry. Renal insufficiency (RI) was defined as creatinine clearance (CrCl) <60 ml/min. RESULTS: NSTE ACS was diagnosed in 1396 patients. Renal insufficiency was diagnosed in 34% of all patients. Only 17% of them had been diagnosed with RI prior to admission. Transfer for invasive treatment was undertaken in 10% of RI patients as compared to 16% of patients with CrCl >60 ml/min (NS). In-hospital mortality among patients remaining on conservative treatment in community hospitals was significantly higher among RI patients (4.0 vs. 0.6%; p <0.001). Thienopyridines were less frequently used in RI patients (46 vs. 54%; p <0.05). In-hospital mortality among RI patients remaining in community hospitals and treated conservatively was higher than among non-RI patients in each TIMI risk score group: 7.3 vs. 2.4% (p <0.05) in the high risk group, 4.1 vs. 1.4% (NS) in the moderate and 3.6 vs. 0% (p <0.001) in the low risk group. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified reduced creatinine clearance and a history of heart failure as independent factors influencing mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Renal insufficiency was present in one-third of NSTE ACS patients. Patients with renal insufficiency had worse clinical risk profile and received less aggressive treatment. Patients with NSTE ACS and renal insufficiency treated conservatively had higher in-hospital mortality. Renal insufficiency modifies mortality irrespective of the TIMI risk score. Creatinine clearance should be considered in modification of the TIMI risk score scale.     

Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Low-Molecular-Weight Heparins and Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Receptor Antagonists in Renal Failure

Data regarding the use of low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) and glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa receptor antagonists in patients with renal failure are limited. Renal failure has the potential to increase the risk of adverse drug events associated with LMWHs and GP IIb/IIIa receptor antagonists. This is due to changes in the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles of these agents in patients with renal failure. Until more data are available, clinicians should consider alternative therapies in this patient population.     

Safety and effectiveness of combined low molecular weight heparin and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors

This study examines the safety and efficacy of low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) in combination with platelet glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitors in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). LMWH has been shown to be as effective as unfractionated heparin (UFH) in the treatment of acute coronary syndrome (ACS), but there are limited data regarding the safety and efficacy of LMWH in combination with GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors. We studied 37,320 patients in the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 3 who were treated with GP IIb/IIIa receptor antagonists from April 1998 to September 2000. Using univariate analysis, clinical events were compared between 2,482 patients who received LMWH and 34,838 patients who were treated with UFH. To adjust for confounding covariates, a multivariate regression analysis was also performed. Major bleeding rates were 4.0% in patients on LMWH versus 4.2% in patients who were treated with UFH (odds ratio [OR] 0.99, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.80 to 1.23, p = 0.92). Similarly, there was no significant difference in the occurrence of recurrent myocardial ischemia (OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.06, p = 0.26), and in-hospital death (OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.05, p = 0.14) between groups. There was a trend toward a decreased risk of recurrent AMI in patients who received LMWH compared with those on UFH (1.5% vs 1.9%, OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.53 to 1.05, p = 0.09). LMWH appears to be a safe and effective alternative to UFH in patients with AMI who receive IIb/IIIa inhibitors.     

Bivalirudin versus heparin and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition among patients with renal impairment undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (a subanalysis of the REPLACE-2 trial)

Among patients who undergo percutaneous coronary intervention, renal impairment is associated with an excessive risk of bleeding and ischemic events. Bivalirudin provides comparable suppression of ischemic events with a decrease in bleeding events compared with heparin and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition. We examined the relation between adverse events, renal impairment, and antithrombotic therapy within a randomized comparison. The Second Randomized Evaluation in PCI Linking Bivalirudin to Reduced Clinical Events per-protocol study population was assessed. Renal function was defined as calculated creatinine clearance <60 ml/min. Events within the overall study population and within each study arm were assessed. Thirty-day events by renal function were compared by chi-square test and logistic regression. Late mortality was compared by log-rank test. Interaction analyses were performed. Among 5,710 patients, renal impairment was associated with increased ischemic events (hazard ratio 1.45, 95% confidence interval 1.13 to 1.88, p = 0.004), bleeding complications (hazard ratio 1.72, 95% confidence interval 1.06 to 2.80, p = 0.028), and excessive 12-month mortality (hazard ratio 3.85, 95% confidence interval 2.67 to 5.54, p <0.001). Bivalirudin provided suppression of ischemic events that was comparable to heparin and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition regardless of renal impairment. Fewer bleeding events with bivalirudin were also evident irrespective of renal dysfunction. No interaction between treatment assignment, bleeding or ischemic complications, and renal impairment was observed. The safety and efficacy of bivalirudin compared with heparin and planned glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition in this high-risk group are comparable and consistent with the results of the overall trial.     

Economic evaluation of bivalirudin with provisional glycoprotein IIB/IIIA inhibition versus heparin with routine glycoprotein IIB/IIIA inhibition for percutaneous coronary intervention: results from the REPLACE-2 trial

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to compare the cost of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) using bivalirudin with provisional platelet glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibition with that of heparin + routine GP IIb/IIIa inhibition. BACKGROUND: Although GP IIb/IIIa inhibition has been shown to reduce ischemic complications in a broad range of patients undergoing PCI, many patients currently do not receive such therapy because of concerns about bleeding complications or cost. Recently, bivalirudin with provisional GP IIb/IIIa inhibition has been validated as an alternative to heparin + routine GP IIb/IIIa inhibition for patients undergoing PCI. However, the cost-effectiveness of this novel strategy is unknown. METHODS: In the Randomized Evaluation in PCI Linking Angiomax to Reduced Clinical Events (REPLACE)-2 trial, 4,651 U.S. patients undergoing non-emergent PCI were randomized to receive bivalirudin with provisional GP IIb/IIIa (n = 2,319) versus heparin + routine GP IIb/IIIa (n = 2,332). Resource utilization data were collected prospectively through 30-day follow-up on all U.S. patients. Medical care costs were estimated using standard methods including bottom-up accounting (for procedural costs), the Medicare fee schedule (for physician services), hospital billing data (for 2,821 of 4,862 admissions), and regression-based approaches for the remaining hospitalizations. RESULTS: Among the bivalirudin group, 7.7% required provisional GP IIb/IIIa. Thirty-day ischemic outcomes including death or myocardial infarction were similar for the bivalirudin and GP IIb/IIIa groups, but bivalirudin resulted in lower rates of major bleeding (2.8% vs. 4.5%, p = 0.002) and minor bleeding (15.1% vs. 28.1%, p < 0.001). Compared with routine GP IIb/IIIa, in-hospital and 30-day costs were reduced by $405 (95% confidence interval [CI] $37 to $773) and $374 (95% CI $61 to $688) per patient with bivalirudin (p < 0.001 for both). Regression modeling demonstrated that, in addition to the costs of the anticoagulants themselves, hospital savings were due primarily to reductions in major bleeding (cost savings = $107/patient), minor bleeding ($52/patient), and thrombocytopenia ($47/patient). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with heparin + routine GP IIb/IIIa inhibition, bivalirudin + provisional GP IIb/IIIa inhibition resulted in similar acute ischemic events and cost savings of $375 to $400/patient depending on the analytic perspective.     

Antiplatelet Strategies: Evaluating Their Current Role in the Setting of Acute Coronary Syndromes

Numerous clinical trials have established the value of antiplatelet therapies for acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Aspirin (ASA), thienopyridines (i.e., clopidogrel and ticlopidine) and GP IIb/IIIa antagonists comprise the major classes of antiplatelet therapies demonstrated to be of benefit in the treatment of ACS and for the prevention of thrombotic complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Clopidogrel is beneficial when administered before and after PCI, and is more effective when combined with either ASA or GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors in preventing post‐PCI complications, coronary subacute stent thrombosis, and thrombotic events in general. It is currently unclear whether a higher loading dose of clopidogrel (600 mg) is better than the standard loading dose (300 mg), how long therapy should continue, and which maintenance dose is optimal. The role of the GP IIb/IIIa antagonists in ACS is less clear due to conflicting data from several studies with different patient populations. Currently, it appears that the use of GP IIb/IIIa antagonists might be most beneficial in high‐risk ACS patients scheduled to undergo PCI, who demonstrate non‐ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction and elevated troponin levels. Copyright © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Prevalence and impact of renal insufficiency on clinical outcomes of patients undergoing coronary revascularization.

BACKGROUND: Patients with renal insufficiency are more likely to die after coronary revascularization, but mild renal insufficiency is neglected and little is known about its clinical effects. METHODS AND RESULTS: In the present study 3,025 patients grouped by estimated creatinine clearance (CrCl) were analyzed to evaluate the association between CrCl and clinical outcome. The mean serum creatinine was 1.0+/-0.4 mg/dl, with 4.3% above normal; in 65.8% CrCl was <90 ml/min. During hospitalization, there were significant differences in mortality among the groups stratified by CrCl (p<0.0001). During follow-up after hospital discharge, there were significant differences in mortality (p<0.0001), new-onset myocardial infarction (p=0.007), and stroke (p=0.032). In patients with severe renal insufficiency, the in-hospital and follow-up mortality reached 15.4% and 31.3%, respectively. The independent risk factors for all-cause death after revascularization were the mode of revascularization, age and the CrCl level. In patients with mild renal insufficiency or normal renal function, the all-cause mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention was significantly lower than that after CABG. CONCLUSIONS: Renal insufficiency is not rare in patients undergoing coronary revascularization and in the present study even mild renal insufficiency correlated with adverse clinical outcomes after revascularization. In patients with normal renal function or mild renal insufficiency, the mode of revascularization might lead to a prognostic difference.     

Use of bivalirudin during percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with diabetes mellitus: an analysis from the randomized evaluation in percutaneous coronary intervention linking angiomax to reduced clinical events (REPLACE)-2 trial

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to confirm that the efficacy and safety of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in diabetic patients are not compromised by a bivalirudin-based antithrombotic strategy. BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown a survival benefit with use of platelet glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitors in diabetic patients undergoing PCI. The Randomized Evaluation in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Linking Angiomax to Reduced Clinical Events (REPLACE)-2 trial showed the non-inferiority of a strategy of bivalirudin with provisional GP IIb/IIIa inhibition compared with routine GP IIb/IIIa inhibition. The relative efficacy of these two strategies in diabetic patients has not been studied. METHODS: We evaluated the diabetic patients enrolled in the REPLACE-2 trial to assess the impact of these antithrombotic strategies on the short- and long-term outcome after PCI. RESULTS: The REPLACE-2 trial enrolled 1,624 diabetic patients and 4,368 non-diabetic patients. Compared with non-diabetic patients, diabetic patients had similar short-term outcome but higher mortality at 1 year (3.06% vs. 1.85%, p = 0.004). There was no difference in short-term or long-term ischemic events among the diabetic patients randomized to the two arms. Specifically, the 1-year mortality rate was non-significantly lower in the bivalirudin arm, suggesting no differential survival impact of the two strategies (2.3% vs. 3.9%). There was less minor bleeding in the bivalirudin arm in diabetic patients (12.6% vs. 24.4%, p < 0.001), whereas no difference was seen in the incidence of major bleeding (3.0% vs. 3.3%, p = 0.69). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with routine GP IIb/IIIa inhibition, the use of bivalirudin with provisional GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors in diabetic patients is associated with no differences in clinical outcomes at 30 days, a trend toward lesser mortality at 1 year, and a reduction in minor bleeding.     

Effectiveness of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor use during primary coronary angioplasty: results of propensity analysis using the New York State Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Reporting System

Patients undergoing primary angioplasty in clinical practice experience a higher risk for adverse events than those enrolled in clinical trials. Whether glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitor use during primary angioplasty is both safe and effective in real life is unknown. Therefore, we examined the pattern of GP IIb/IIIa use and its effectiveness in a large population-based cohort of 7,321 patients who underwent primary angioplasty in New York State. Propensity analysis was used to account for the nonrandomized use of GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors. Overall, 78.5% of patients who underwent primary angioplasty received GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors. In-hospital mortality was significantly lower with GP IIb/IIIa use (3% vs 6.2%, p <0.0001) after adjustment for both propensity score (odds ratio 0.57, 95% confidence interval 0.44 to 0.74, p <0.0001) and the combination of propensity score and clinical characteristics (odds ratio 0.63, 95% confidence interval 0.45 to 0.88, p = 0.006). Patients with older age and higher Mayo Clinic Risk Score (MCRS) received GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors less often. However, stratified analysis of patients with low to moderate risk (MCRS <12) versus high risk (>or=12) demonstrated that GP IIb/IIIa use lowered risk of mortality both in low- to moderate-risk (1.39% vs 3.23%, p <0.0001) and high-risk patients (16.15% vs 22.41%, p = 0.03). In conclusion, adjunct GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor use during primary angioplasty is effective and associated with improved in-hospital survival rates.     

Impact of major bleeding on 30-day mortality and clinical outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndromes: an analysis from the ACUITY Trial.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine the predictors of major bleeding and the impact of major bleeding on outcomes, including mortality, in acute coronary syndromes (ACS). BACKGROUND: Whether major bleeding independently predicts mortality in patients with ACS undergoing an early invasive strategy is undefined. METHODS: Patients (n = 13,819) with moderate- and high-risk ACS were randomized to heparin (unfractionated or enoxaparin) plus glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition (GPI), bivalirudin plus GPI, or bivalirudin monotherapy (plus provisional GPI). Logistic regression was used to determine predictors of 30-day major bleeding and mortality. RESULTS: Major bleeding rates in patients treated with heparin plus GPI were higher versus bivalirudin monotherapy (5.7% vs. 3.0%, p < 0.001) and similar versus bivalirudin plus GPI (5.7% vs. 5.3%, p = 0.38). Independent predictors of major bleeding were advanced age, female gender, diabetes, hypertension, renal insufficiency, anemia, no prior percutaneous coronary intervention, cardiac biomarker elevation, ST-segment deviation >/=1 mm, and treatment with heparin plus GPI versus bivalirudin monotherapy. Patients with major bleeding had higher 30-day rates of mortality (7.3% vs. 1.2%, p < 0.0001), composite ischemia (23.1% vs. 6.8%, p < 0.0001), and stent thrombosis (3.4% vs. 0.6%, p < 0.0001) versus those without major bleeding. Major bleeding was an independent predictor of 30-day mortality (odds ratio 7.55, 95% confidence interval 4.68 to 12.18, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Major bleeding is a powerful independent predictor of 30-day mortality in patients with ACS managed invasively. Several factors independently predict major bleeding, including treatment with heparin plus GPI compared with bivalirudin monotherapy. Knowledge of these findings might be useful to reduce bleeding risk and improve outcomes in ACS.     

The combination of enoxaparin, glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors and an early invasive approach among acute coronary syndrome patients

OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to assess the feasibility and safety of enoxaparin in combination with glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitors during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) as part of an early invasive strategy in patients presenting with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). BACKGROUND: Trials in patients with ACS have evaluated the utility of enoxaparin, adjuvant GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors with PCI, and an early invasive approach. Information about the combination of all three of these approaches, however, is limited. METHODS: Forty-nine patients with ACS underwent cardiac catheterization, of whom 23 underwent PCI with enoxaparin and GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors. RESULTS: The primary endpoint of the study, a composite of death, myocardial infarction or urgent revascularization at 30 days, occurred in 8% of patients undergoing PCI. There were no deaths. One patient received a blood transfusion. No other adverse events occurred. These event rates were comparable to those from the pooled EPILOG/EPISTENT database, in which intravenous unfractionated heparin was used in conjunction with GP IIb/IIIa receptor blockade. The mean anti-Xa level in patients undergoing PCI was 0.74 0.48 U/ml. The majority of patients who underwent PCI within eight hours of their last dose of enoxaparin had therapeutic anti-Xa levels. CONCLUSION: In patients with ACS, enoxaparin in combination with GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors and an early invasive approach resulted in comparable clinical complication and bleeding rates versus historical references utilizing unfractionated heparin.     

Combining enoxaparin and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonists for the treatment of acute coronary syndromes: final results of the National Investigators Collaborating on Enoxaparin-3 (NICE-3) study

Background

In high-risk patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS), there have been concerns relating to the safety of using low molecular weight heparins (LMWH) in combination with a glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa antagonist, and the continued use of LMWH in patients brought to the cardiac catheterization laboratory for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

Methods

The National Investigators Collaborating on Enoxaparin-3 (NICE-3) study was an open-label observational study of enoxaparin in combination with any 1 of 3 available GP IIb/IIIa antagonists in patients presenting with non-ST-elevation ACS. The primary end point was the incidence of major bleeding not related to coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. Data were also recorded on the incidence of death, myocardial infarction (MI), and urgent revascularization for repeat ischemia.

Results

A total of 671 patients with validated data were treated with enoxaparin; 628 of these patients also received a GP IIb/IIIa antagonist (tirofiban, n = 229; eptifibatide, n = 272; abciximab, n = 127); 283 of 628 underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The 30-day incidence of non-CABG major bleeding was 1.9%, and was not significantly higher than a prespecified historical control rate of 2.0%. Outcome events included death (1.0% at hospital discharge and 1.6% at 30 days), MI (3.5% and 5.1%, respectively), and urgent revascularization (2.7% and 6.8%, respectively).

Conclusions

The safety of enoxaparin plus a GP IIb/IIIa antagonist was comparable to that of unfractionated heparin plus a GP IIb/IIIa antagonist, as reported in other recent major trials. Patients undergoing PCI can be safely managed with enoxaparin and a GP IIb/IIIa antagonist, without supplemental use of unfractionated heparin.     

Low molecular weight heparins and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonists

The consistent message that emerges from virtually every recent acute coronary syndrome (ACS) trial is that the old "standard" of using aspirin and unfractionated heparin (UFH) can be considerably improved upon. Low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs) (most notably enoxaparin) are emerging as a broad replacement for UFH. Initial safety concerns about combining LMWHs and glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa antagonists have not been borne out; in fact, major bleeding complications may be lower with LMWHs. Clinical outcomes to date suggest that LMWHs may be a better first line therapy than UFH on which to superimpose adjunctive GP IIb/IIIa antagonists. Emerging clinical experience further supports the safety and efficacy of this combination regimen. The forthcoming SYNERGY study will prospectively compare enoxaparin and UFH in high risk patients in whom an invasive management strategy is pursued, with a high coincident use of GP IIb/IIIa antagonists. As the standard of care moves forward, we will see increasing use of LMWHs, with and without GP IIb/IIIa antagonists in conservatively and invasively managed patients.     

Treatment and one-year outcome of patients with renal dysfunction across the broad spectrum of acute coronary syndromes

BACKGROUND: There are limited data on the treatment and long-term outcome of patients with renal dysfunction across the broad spectrum of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) in Canada. OBJECTIVES: To examine the treatment patterns and outcome of ACS patients with renal dysfunction. METHODS: In the prospective, multicentre, Canadian ACS Registry, 3510 patients hospitalized for ACS (including unstable angina, ST and non-ST elevation myocardial infarction) were categorized into four groups: normal renal function (creatinine clearance [CrCl] 90 mL/min or greater; n=1152), mild renal dysfunction (CrCl 60 mL/min to 89 mL/min; n=1253), moderate renal dysfunction (CrCl 30 mL/min to 59 mL/min; n=944) and severe renal dysfunction (CrCl less than 30 mL/min; n=161). Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to examine the independent prognostic value of renal dysfunction, and the association of various therapies with one-year survival. RESULTS: All-cause mortality at one year was 2.8%, 6.4%, 14.5% and 40.9% in patients with normal renal function, and mild, moderate and severe renal dysfunction, respectively (P for trend<0.001). After adjusting for other prognosticators, moderate (OR 1.82, 95% CI 1.08 to 3.08) and severe (OR 6.29, 95% CI 3.37 to 11.77) renal dysfunction remained independent predictors of one-year death. Patients with renal dysfunction were less likely to receive fibrinolytic therapy, to undergo coronary angiography and revascularization in hospital, and to be treated with acetylsalicylic acid, beta-blockers and lipid-lowering therapy at discharge and at one-year follow-up. The association of in-hospital revascularization, and discharge use of acetylsalicylic acid and beta-blockers with better one-year survival was similar among patients with normal and impaired renal function. CONCLUSIONS: Renal dysfunction is prevalent and independently predicts higher mortality in patients with ACS. The current underutilization of effective therapies may contribute to the poor outcome. There remains an important opportunity to improve care in this high-risk population.     

Efficacy and safety of bivalirudin in patients receiving clopidogrel therapy after diagnostic angiography for percutaneous coronary intervention in acute coronary syndromes

Objectives : This study sought to investigate if the efficacy of bivalirudin monotherapy is similar to heparin plus GP IIb/IIIa inhibition in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) treated with clopidogrel following diagnostic angiography. Background : Prior trials have demonstrated that peri‐procedural bivalirudin therapy confers similar efficacy as heparin plus GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors, while lowering the risk of bleeding complications in ACS patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervnetions (PCI). However, the incidence of adverse ischemic events post‐PCI appeared to be higher in patients receiving bivalirudin without adequate pretreatment with clopidogrel. Methods : Using the 2004/2005 Cornell Angioplasty Registry, we evaluated 980 consecutive patients undergoing urgent PCI for UA/NSTEMI who were treated with either bivalirudin or UFH plus GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor. We excluded patients who were on chronic clopidogrel therapy or received clopidogrel pretreatment prior to angiography. All patients received a clopidogrel load (≥300‐mg dose) immediately before or after the PCI. Long‐term all‐cause mortality was obtained for 100% of patients, with a mean follow‐up of 24.6 ± 7.7 months. Results : Of the 980 study patients, 461 (47.0%) were treated with bivalirudin and 519 (53.0%) patients received UFH plus GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor. DES were used in 88% of PCI; 45% of patients presented with NSTEMI. The incidence of in‐hospital death (0.4% vs. 0.2%, P = 0.604), post‐procedural MI (6.9% vs. 5.4%, P = 0.351), and MACE including death, stroke, emergent CABG/PCI, and MI (7.6% vs. 5.8%, P = 0.304) were similar in patients treated with bivalirudin versus UFH plus GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors, respectively. The incidence of in‐hospital stent thrombosis was similar (0.7% vs. 0%, P = 0.104), while major (0.9% vs. 2.9%, P = 0.034) and minor bleeding (10.4% vs. 18.9%, P < 0.001) was reduced in the bivalirudin‐treated group. By two‐years of follow‐up, after propensity‐score adjusted multivariate Cox regression analysis, there was no significant difference in long‐term mortality between the two groups (HR 1.18; 95%CI 0.64–2.19, P = 0.598). Conclusions : In patients presenting with ACS and receiving clopidogrel treatment after angiography (before or within 30 min of PCI), peri‐procedural bivalirudin monotherapy suppresses acute and long‐term adverse events to a similar extent as does UFH plus GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors, while significantly lowering the risk of bleeding complications. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Angiographic and clinical outcomes of bivalirudin versus heparin in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention

BACKGROUND: Heparin with adjunctive glycoprotein IIb/IIIa platelet receptor (GP IIb/IIIa) inhibitors has demonstrated its effectiveness in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Bivalirudin, a direct thrombin inhibitor, has recently been shown to be an effective alternative for patients undergoing elective PCI. OBJECTIVES: To assess the angiographic and clinical outcomes of adjunctive pharmacological strategies in a high-risk population presenting with ACS. METHODS: Of 891 consecutive PCI patients with ACS, 304 received bivalirudin (60.5% male, 68+/-11 years) and were compared with 283 who received heparin (58.7% male, 66+/-12 years). A 30-day major adverse cardiac event was defined as the occurrence of cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, urgent revascularization or major hemorrhage. RESULTS: Adjunctive GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors were used in 14.1% of the bivalirudin group and in 72.4% of the heparin group (P<0.010). The occurrence of Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow less than grade 3 was lower and the achievement of angiographic success was higher in the bivalirudin group than in the heparin group (5.2% versus 8.2%, 94.7% versus 89.7%, P=0.039 and P<0.010, respectively). There was no difference between groups in the incidence of bleeding events (bivalirudin 2.0% versus heparin 3.5%, P not significant) and in 30-day major adverse cardiac events (bivalirudin 8.3% versus heparin 5.7%, P=0.223). CONCLUSIONS: In the high-risk cohort undergoing PCI, bivalirudin with provisional GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors achieved better angiographic results. Although not powered to show a difference, and while acknowledging that a selection bias could have affected the data, the present study showed that bivalirudin may be as clinically effective and safe as heparin with adjunctive GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors.     

Impact of Platelet Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitor Therapy on In-Hospital Outcomes and Long-Term Survival Following Percutaneous Coronary Rotational Atherectomy

Background: Percutaneous coronary rotational atherectomy (PCRA) is a potent stimulus of platelet activation and aggregation in vivo. For this reason, many patients undergoing PCRA are treated with platelet glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitors. However, there is limited data regarding the ability of GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors to reduce ischemic complications of PCRA and no data regarding their effect on long-term survival.Methods: Data on 1138 consecutive patients undergoing PCRA in 5 hospitals in 1998–1999 were pooled and analyzed. Long-term survival was available for all 530 patients treated in 3 of the hospitals.Results and conclusions: GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors were administered to 315 of 1138 (28%) PCRA patients. There was no difference in age, gender or race among patients treated with and without GP IIb/IIIa antagonists. The prevalence of hypertension, diabetes, renal insufficiency and peripheral vascular disease did not differ between groups. Unstable angina was more common among patients treated with GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors (45% vs. 38%, P = 0.036)Patients treated with GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors had lower ejection fractions (50% vs. 55%, P < 0.001) and more 3-vessel coronary disease (24% vs. 16%, P = 0.002). Angiographic success was over 99% in both groups (P = NS). The frequency of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) was slightly greater in GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor treated patients (3.8% vs. 2.2%, P = 0.126). At a mean follow-up of 3 years, mortality was 13.3% in the GP IIb/IIIa treated patients and 12% in the untreated patients (P = 0.224). On Cox proportional hazards analysis, treatment with a GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor was not significantly associated with increased survival (Hazard Ratio, 0.81, 95% Confidence Interval, 0.631–1.039, P = 0.098). These data do not indicate a significant association between GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor treatment during PCRA and MACE or survival.Condensed Abstract. There is limited data regarding the ability of GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors to reduce ischemic complications of percutaneous coronary rotational atherectomy (PCRA) and no data regarding their effect on long-term survival. These data do not indicate a significant association between GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor treatment during PCRA and MACE or survival.     

Low-molecular-weight heparin therapy for non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes and during percutaneous coronary intervention: an expert consensus

Background Therapy with either low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) or glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa receptor antagonists is of benefit to patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACSs). However, algorithms that define how LMWH may be used in patients, proceeding from medical management to intervention and in conjunction with GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors, are lacking. The objectives of this task force were to formulate recommendations based on all available data for the use of LMWH, both with and without GP IIb/IIIa receptor antagonists, and to provide seamless integration of care during the transition from medical to interventional management. Methods and Results An international task force of 14 cardiologists with extensive experience in clinical trials was convened in New York in February 2001 to address issues related to the use of LMWH in patients with non-ST-elevation ACS. Evidence from randomized trials, observational studies, and other reports was discussed, and consensus recommendations were formulated. Conclusions Substantial evidence exists that patients receiving LMWH for an ACS can safely undergo cardiac catheterization and percutaneous coronary intervention. Concerns regarding the transition of these patients from the medical service to the cardiac catheterization laboratory should therefore not impede the upstream use of LMWH. Furthermore, LMWH and GP IIb/IIIa receptor antagonists can be used safely in combination, with no apparent increase in the risk of major bleeding. Consensus algorithms for therapy are presented. (Am Heart J 2002;144:615-24.)