Complications at gastrojejunostomy after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: comparison between 21- and 25-mm circular staplers.

BACKGROUND: Complications involving the gastrojejunostomy (GJ) after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) for morbid obesity frequently result in hospital readmission and additional procedures. The purpose of this study was to compare the complication rate of GJ performed with the 21- and 25-mm circular staplers. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the incidence of stricture, bleeding, ulcer, and leak at the GJ in 438 consecutive patients who had undergone LRYGB. RESULTS: The GJ was performed using the 25-mm stapler in 374 patients and the 21-mm stapler in 64 patients. Of the 50 anastomotic complications, 11 (17.2%) occurred with the 21-mm stapler, including 6 strictures (9.4%), 4 ulcers (6.3%), and 1 leak (1.6%), and 39 (10.4%) with the 25-mm stapler, including 11 strictures (2.9%), 6 acute bleeding episodes (1.6%), 19 ulcers (5.4%), and 4 leaks (1.1%). Rehospitalization was required in 9 patients (47%) with a pure stricture and 17 (74%) with ulcers. The incidence of pure stricture was significantly greater in the GJ performed with the 21-mm than with the 25-mm stapler (P = .026, Fisher's exact test). No difference was found in the rate of acute bleeding, leak, or ulcer between the 2 groups. All strictures resolved with balloon dilation. Four patients with stenotic ulcers that failed to respond to dilation and medications required operative revision. No difference was found in postoperative weight loss between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: Anastomotic complications were recognized in 50 (11.4%) of 438 patients who had undergone LRYGB in which the GJ was performed using circular staplers, including 11 (17.2%) with the 21-mm and 39 (10.2%) with the 25-mm stapler. The rate of anastomotic stricture was significantly lower using the 25-mm circular stapler.     

Predictors, Treatment, and Outcomes of Gastrojejunostomy Stricture after Gastric Bypass for Morbid Obesity

Background The aims of this study were to determine the rate of gastrojejunostomy (GJ) stricture following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP), the independent predictors of stricture, and clinical outcomes with and without a stricture. Methods Univariate and multivariate analysis of peri-operative and outcomes data were prospectively collected from 379 morbidly obese patients who underwent consecutive open or laparoscopic RYGBP from January 2003 to August 2006. Predictors studied were age, gender, BMI, co-morbidities, surgical technique (hand-sewn vs linear stapler vs 21-mm vs 25-mm circular stapler; open vs laparoscopic; retrocolic retrogastric vs antecolic antegastric Roux limb course, and Roux limb length), and surgeon experience. Outcomes studied consisted of occurrence of GJ strictures, technical details and outcomes after endoscopic therapy, and excess weight loss (EWL) at 12 months. Results 15 patients (4.1%) developed a GJ stricture. The use of a 21-mm circular stapler was identified as the only independent predictor of a GJ stricture (odds ratio 11.3; 95% CI 2.2-57.4, P = 0.004). Endoscopic dilation relieved stricture symptoms in all patients (60% one dilation only). There was no significant difference in %EWL at 12 months between the patients with a stricture (median EWL 54%, IQR 49 – 63) vs those without a stricture (median EWL 61%, IQR 49-73, P = 0.33). Conclusion The rate of GJ strictures is 4.1%. The use of a 21-mm circular stapler is the only independent predictor of GJ stricture. Endoscopic dilation relieved symptoms in all patients.Weight loss is independent of the anastomotic technique used and occurrence of a GJ stricture.     

The Effect of Route of Anvil Insertion on Stricture Rates with Circular Stapled Gastrojejunostomy During Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass

Background

A higher incidence of gastrojejunal (GJ) anastomotic strictures has been reported following laparoscopic gastric bypass (LRYGB) with the 21 mm compared to 25 mm circular stapler. We hypothesized that the rate of stricture formation is affected by route of anvil insertion and its position relative to the gastric pouch staple line [trans‐gastric above staple line (trans‐gastric) vs. trans‐oral through staple line (trans‐oral)] following LRYGB.

Methods

Retrospective review of consecutive patients who underwent LRYGB with circular stapled GJ studied in four groups: trans-gastric‐21 mm, trans-gastric‐25 mm, trans-oral‐21 mm, and trans-oral-25 mm. Primary outcome studied was GJ stricture; secondary outcomes were results with endoscopic therapy and weight loss at 12 months. Predictors studied were age, gender, body mass index (BMI), comorbidities, and operative technical factors including anvil size and insertion route. Regression analyses were performed to identify predictors of GJ stricture.

Results

Eight hundred seventy-six patients underwent LRYGB. Seventy-six (8.7 %) developed a GJ stricture. The highest stricture rate occurred in the trans-gastric‐21 mm group (17 %, p?<?.01 for all comparisons). Stricture rates were similar for trans-gastric‐25 mm (8.4 %), trans-oral‐21 mm (5.2 %), and trans-oral‐25 mm (1.6 %) groups. Independent predictors of stricture were: trans-gastric‐21 mm (OR 10.9, 95%CI 1.4–85.1; p?=?.022) and age (OR 0.97, 95%CI 0.95–0.99; p?=?.002). Endoscopic dilation relieved symptoms in all patients. There was no difference in %EWL at 12 months in patients with and without a stricture.

Conclusions

We conclude that the trans-oral-21 mm anvil is associated with a low stricture rate. With the advantage of smaller abdominal wall wound, trans-oral‐21 mm may be the preferred size and route of anvil insertion.

     

Incidence and outcome of anastomotic stricture after laparoscopic gastric bypass

Anastomotic stricture is a frequent complication after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (GBP). We evaluated the frequency of anastomotic stricture following laparoscopic GBP using a 21 mm. vs. a 25 mm circular stapler for construction of the gastrojejunostomy and the safety and efficacy of endoscopic balloon dilation in the management of anastomotic stricture. We reviewed data on 29 patients in whom anastomotic strictures developed after laparoscopic GBP. All strictures were managed with endoscopic balloon dilation using an 18 mm balloon catheter under fluoroscopic guidance. Main outcome measures were the number of anastomotic strictures in patients in whom the 21 mm (vs. 25 mm) circular stapler was used to create the gastrojejunostomy, time interval between the primary operation and symptoms, complications of endoscopic balloon dilation, the number of patients with resolution of obstructive symptoms, and body weight loss. There were 28 females with a mean age of 39 years and a mean body mass index of 48 kg/ m2. Anastomotic stricture occurred significantly more frequently with the use of the 21 mm compared to the 25 mm circular stapler (26.8% vs. 8.8%, respectively; P<0.01). The median time interval between the primary operation and presentation of stricture was 46 days. After the initial dilation, recurrent stricture developed in 5 (17.2%) of 29 patients. These five patients underwent a second endoscopic dilation, and only one of these five patients required a third endoscopic dilation. None of the 29 patients required more than three endoscopic dilations. The mean percentage of excess body weight loss at 1 year for patients in whom the 21 mm circular stapler was used for creation of the gastrojejunostomy was similar to that for patients in whom the 25 mm circular stapler was used (68.2% vs. 70.2%, P = 0.8). In this series the rate of anastomotic stricture significantly decreased with the use of the 2 5 mm circular stapler for construction of the gastrojejunostomy without compromising weight loss. Endoscopic balloon dilation is a safe and effective option in the management of anastomotic stricture following laparoscopic GBP. Presented at the Forty-Fourth Annual Meeting of The Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, Orlando, Florida, May 18–21, 2003.     

Surgical Stricturoplasty in the Treatment of Ileal Pouch Strictures

Objective

The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of stricturoplasty and endoscopic balloon dilatation in the treatment for ileal pouch strictures.

Method

Consecutive inflammatory bowel disease patients with pouch strictures seen at our Pouch Center from 2002 to 2012 were studied. The efficacy and safety of stricturoplasty (vs. endoscopic balloon dilation) were evaluated with both univariate and multivariate analyses.

Results

A total of 167 patients met the inclusion criteria, including 16 (9.6 %) with surgical stricturoplasty and 151 (90.4 %) with endoscopic balloon dilation. Ninety-four patients (56.3 %) were male, with a mean age at the diagnosis of pouch stricture of 41.6?±?13.2 years. Fifty-one patients (30.5 %) had multiple pouch strictures, while 100 (59.9 %) patients had strictures at the pouch inlet. The mean length of pouch strictures was 1.2?±?0.6 cm. No difference was found between the stricturoplasty and endoscopic dilation groups in clinicopathological variables, except for the degree of strictures (p?=?0.019). After a mean follow-up of 4.1?±?2.6 years, pouch stricture recurred in 92 patients (55.1 %) and 21 (12.6 %) patients developed pouch failure. The time interval between the procedure and pouch stricture recurrence or pouch failure was longer in the stricturoplasty group than that in the endoscopic dilation group (p?<?0.001). Patients in the two groups had similar overall pouch survival rates and stricture-free survival rates. In the multivariate analysis, stricturoplasty vs. endoscopic dilation was not significantly associated with either overall pouch survival or stricture-free survival. There was no difference in the procedure-associated complication rates between the two groups.

Conclusion

Surgical stricturoplasty and endoscopic dilation treatment are complimentary techniques for pouch strictures. Repeated endoscopic dilatations are often required, while surgical stricturoplasty appeared to yield a longer time interval to stricture recurrence or pouch failure.     

Linear-Stapled Gastrojejunostomy with Transverse Hand-Sewn Enterotomy Closure Significantly Reduces Strictures for Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass

Background

Gastrojejunostomy (GJ) stricture is a common complication after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) for morbid obesity, and the optimal anastomotic technique remains uncertain. The objective of this study was to use cumulative summation (CUSUM) analysis to compare rates of gastrojejunostomy strictures after linear stapling with longitudinal versus transverse enterotomy closure in gastric bypass patients.

Methods

Charts of all consecutive patients with at least 60 days of post-operative follow-up after laparoscopic RYGB (LRYGB) at our tertiary care institution from Nov 2009 to Dec, 2011 were retrospectively reviewed. Gastrojejunostomy stricture was diagnosed by history and upper endoscopy. CUSUM method of quality control analysis was used to determine sequential improvement in stricture rates with the change in technique.

Results

A total of 197 patients were included (97 longitudinal closure, median age 44 (21–67), median BMI 47 (35–80), 85.8 % female). Gastrojejunostomy strictures occurred in 16 % of longitudinal and 0 % of transverse patients (p?=?<0.0001). CUSUM analysis demonstrated sequential statistically significant improvement in stricture rates after the change in technique was applied. The longitudinal group had a statistically significant increased rate of surgery-related readmissions (15.5 vs 6.0 %, p?=?0.038), with 43.7 % of those readmissions related to GJ strictures. There were no other significant outcome differences between groups.

Conclusions

Linear-stapled anastomosis with a transverse enterotomy closure significantly reduces the rate of gastrojejunostomy stricture for LRYGB, considerably reducing procedural morbidity.     

Role of Intraoperative Esophagogastroenteroscopy in Minimizing Gastrojejunostomy-Related Morbidity: Experience with 2,311 Laparoscopic Gastric Bypasses with Linear Stapler Anastomosis

Background

Anastomotic leaks and strictures of the gastrojejunostomy are a cause of major morbidity following laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB). Reported rates of leaks vary between 0 and 5.2 %. This has led bariatric surgeons to use a variety of intraoperative methods to detect incompetent suture lines. The aim of the study was to evaluate the role of intraoperative endoscopy in reducing the rate of postoperative anastomotic complications. The setting of this study is in a community teaching hospital.

Methods

Medical records of 2,311 patients who underwent a LRYGB from 2002 to 2011 were retrospectively reviewed utilizing the hospitals’ bariatric surgery database. Demographics, weight, body mass index, intraoperative endoscopy results, and postoperative outcomes within 90 days after surgery were analyzed.

Results

Endoscopy was attempted in 2,311 patients and completed in 2,308 (99.9 %). Intraoperative leak was detected in 80 (3.5 %) patients; suture line was reinforced in 46 patients (2 %), while in the other 34 patients the leak was transient at only high insufflation pressure. Postoperative clinical leaks were detected in four cases (0.2 %) two of which had initial leaks intraoperatively. In two cases, the anastomosis was too tight and required reconstruction. Twenty-five patients (1.1 %) developed early postoperative strictures requiring endoscopic dilatation within 90 days. Three patients (0.1 %) had iatrogenic injury at the time of intraoperative endoscopy, all three healed without delayed morbidity.

Conclusions

The routine use of intraoperative endoscopy in LRYGB with the linear stapler anastomosis technique is associated with a complication/failure rate of 0.3 % and low gastrojejunostomy-related morbidity after LRYGB within 90 days (leak rate of 0.2 % and stricture rate of 1.1 %).     

Gastrojejunal Strictures after Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass With a 21-MM Circular Stapler

Introduction:

Intraluminal staplers for gastrojejunostomy construction during Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP) may be associated with postoperative strictures. We analyzed outcomes of a transabdominal circular-stapled RYGBP with evaluation of short- and long-term anastomotic complications.

Methods:

All laparoscopic RYGBPs performed between January 2004 and December 2005 at an academic institution were reviewed. The gastrojejunostomy was created by using the transabdominal passage of a 21-mm intraluminal circular stapler into an antecolic, antegastric Roux limb. This retrospective chart review analyzes patient demographics, anastomotic complications, and weight loss.

Results:

Between January 2004 and December 2005, 159 patients underwent transabdominal circular-stapled RYGBP. Fifteen patients developed a stenosis at the gastrojejunostomy, all requiring endoscopic balloon dilatation. One of these patients required laparoscopic revision of the gastrojejunostomy. Eleven strictures occurred after 30 days, whereas only 4 strictures occurred within 30 days of surgery. Two marginal ulcerations were seen within 1 year of surgery.

Conclusion:

Our 9.4% stricture rate parallels what has been reported in the literature. The majority of strictures were amenable to one endoscopic treatment session. Transabdominal circular-stapled gastrojejunostomy is a reproducible construct for use in bariatric surgery.     

Incidence of Gastrojejunostomy Stricture in Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Using an Autologous Fibrin Sealant

Background

Anastomotic leak at the gastrojejunostomy is a life-threatening complication of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB). Fibrin sealants have been used as topical adjuncts to reduce leaks at the gastrojejunostomy. Our clinical observations suggest that an unintended consequence may be the promotion of anastomotic stricture. We hypothesized that the use of fibrin sealant at the gastrojejunostomy in patients undergoing LRYGB decreases the incidence of anastomotic leak but increases the incidence of clinically significant stricture.

Methods

Following institutional review board approval, medical records of patients undergoing LRYGB by two surgeons at a single institution over a 5-year period were retrospectively reviewed. Preoperative demographics and postoperative complication rates including incidence of gastrojejunostomy leak and endoscopically diagnosed stricture requiring dilation within 1 year of surgery were recorded.

Results

Four hundred twenty-five patients had fibrin sealant routinely applied to their gastrojejunostomy site and 104 did not. Four leaks occurred in the sealant group and two leaks occurred in the control group (p?=?0.2). Of patients who received sealant, 1.6 % needed postoperative blood transfusion compared to those 1.6 % of patient who did not receive sealant (p?=?0.05). There was a significantly increased rate of strictures requiring dilation in the sealant group (11.3 % compared to 4.8 % stricture rate in patients who did not receive sealant, p?=?0.04).

Conclusions

In our experience, the use of fibrin sealant at linear stapled gastrojejunostomy site during LRYGB increases the incidence of clinically significant postoperative stricture and does not reduce the incidence of anastomotic leak.     

Stricture dilation after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass

BACKGROUND: In surgical treatment of morbid obesity, maintaining a restrictive anastomosis is key to long-range success. However, laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) may result in gastrojejunal (GJ) stricture, requiring treatment in up to 27% of patients. METHODS: This is a retrospective review of the outcome of 223 consecutive LRYGB patients. Patients developing stricture received standard endoscopic balloon dilation by the same surgeon. Stricture and nonstricture groups were compared for excess body weight loss (EBWL) at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. RESULTS: GJ stricture requiring dilation occurred in 38 patients (17%). After dilation all patients were relieved of stricture symptoms and none required revision. By 12 months, patients with stricture had an EBWL of 86% compared with nonstrictured patients at 75%. CONCLUSION: Endoscopic balloon dilation is a safe and effective treatment option for GJ stricture. Improved weight loss occurred for patients with stricture requiring dilation.     

Endoscopic Dilation of Gastrojejunal Anastomotic Strictures After Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass. Predictors of Initial Failure

Background and aims  

Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) is the most frequent technique performed in bariatric surgery. Gastrojejunal anastomotic stricture is one of the most common postoperative complications. The aims of this study were to evaluate the efficacy and safety of endoscopic balloon dilation in the treatment of the gastrojejunal anastomotic strictures after LRYGB and to look for predicting factors that would indicate the need of repeated dilations.     

Circular Stapler Size and Risk of Anastomotic Complications in Gastroduodenostomy for Gastric Cancer

Background

A Billroth I reconstruction with a mechanically sutured anastomosis is commonly performed in gastric cancer patients. Some surgeons prefer to use large circular staplers during suturing to minimize risks for anastomotic stricture and gastric stasis after surgery. The effect of stapler size on anastomotic complications has not been validated.

Methods

This study was conducted with 1,031 patients who underwent gastrectomy and Billroth I reconstruction at Samsung Medical Center in Seoul, Korea, between January 2007 and October 2008. Patients were assigned to group A (384 patients) or group B (647 patients) depending on the size of the circular stapler that the surgeon selected for mechanical anastomosis. A 25?mm circular stapler was used for patients in group A, and a 28 or 29?mm circular stapler was used for patients in group B. Postoperative complications were analyzed retrospectively.

Results

The incidence of complications (e.g., gastric stasis, anastomotic stricture, and bleeding) did not differ significantly between groups. Age greater than 60?years was the only significant risk factor for anastomotic complications identified in univariate and multivariate analyses.

Conclusions

Stapler size was unrelated to complications, such as stricture and gastric stasis. Age was the only significant risk factor for anastomotic complications after gastroduodenostomy.     

Outcomes of balloon dilation for the treatment of strictures after endoscopic submucosal dissection compared with peptic strictures

Background

The outcomes of balloon dilation for the treatment of strictures caused by endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) have not been evaluated previously. This study was designed to evaluate and compare the effectiveness and complications of balloon dilation for post-ESD strictures and peptic strictures.

Methods

The medical records of 14 patients with post-ESD strictures and 48 patients with peptic strictures who underwent fluoroscopically or endoscopically guided balloon dilation between January 1997 and April 2011 at the Asan Medical Center in Korea were reviewed retrospectively.

Results

The technical success rates (defined as successful dilation without major complications) of the post-ESD and peptic stricture groups were 92.9 % (13/14) and 93.8 % (45/48), respectively (p = 1.000). For the post-ESD and peptic stricture groups, the clinical success rates (defined as symptom improvement, as determined by the patient) at 1 month were 92.9 % (13/14) and 83.3 % (40/48), respectively (p = 0.67). Their clinical success rates at 6 months were 71.4 % (10/14) and 70 % (28/40), respectively (p = 1.000). The mean weight gains of the post-ESD stricture group 1 and 6 months after balloon dilation were 1.1 and 4.8 kg, respectively, whereas the peptic group gained 1.4 and 3.4 kg, respectively (p = 0.814). All complications were perforations. The complication rates of the post-ESD and peptic stricture groups were 7.1 % (1/14) and 10.5 % (5/48), respectively (p = 1.000).

Conclusions

Balloon dilation is an effective and safe treatment for post-ESD strictures.     

The current diagnosis and treatment of benign biliary stricture

Purpose

As laparoscopic cholecystectomy and liver transplantation (LT) have become more common, so has biliary stricture. Fortunately, endoscopic treatment has almost simultaneously been developed. This article reviews the recent reports concerning the management of benign biliary strictures (BBS).

Methods

The literature regarding the diagnosis and treatment of BBS is reviewed after an electronic search of PubMed from 1982 to 2009 was performed.

Results

Despite the existence of diagnostic tools including tumor markers, brush cytology, intraductal ultrasonography and other imaging modalities, differentiating BBS from malignant stricture remains challenging, as does differentiating IgG4-related sclerosing cholangitis from other benign strictures. Endoscopic treatment with balloon dilation of the stricture and serial insertions of stents is the preferred initial treatment for BBS. However, the outcomes of endoscopic treatments for primary sclerosing cholangitis or chronic pancreatitis are poorer than those for post-surgical biliary stricture. When endoscopic treatments fail to repair complicated biliary strictures such as Bismuth types III, IV, and V, surgical repair is recommended. Among the non-anastomotic BBS, intrahepatic bilateral type strictures after LT may require repeat transplantation.

Conclusion

Early referral to tertiary centers with an alliance among hepatobiliary surgeons, interventional radiologists, and endoscopists is necessary to assure optimal results.     

Intracorporeal circular stapling esophagojejunostomy using the transorally inserted anvil (OrVil™) after laparoscopic total gastrectomy

Background

Laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) has not become as popular as laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (LDG) because of the more difficult reconstruction technique. Despite various modifications of reconstruction methods after LTG, an optimal procedure has yet to be established. The authors report the newly developed reconstruction technique after LTG: intracorporeal circular stapling esophagojejunostomy using the transorally inserted anvil (OrVil?; Covidien, Mansfield, MA, USA).

Methods

After full mobilization of the abdominal esophagus, the esophagus is transected with an endoscopic linear stapler. The anvil is then transorally inserted into the esophagus by using the OrVil? system. After jejunojejunostomy is performed through a 4-cm midline minilaparotomy, preparing a 50-cm Roux-en-Y jejunal limb, a circular stapler is inserted into the jejunum and introduced into the abdominal cavity. Pneumoperitoneum is established by sealing off the laparotomy wound retractor with a surgical glove attached to the circular stapler. Double-stapling esophagojejunostomy with a circular stapler is performed intracorporeally, and the jejunal stump is closed with an endoscopic linear stapler.

Results

Of the 16 patients who underwent this operation, there was no intraoperative complication or conversion to open surgery, and no patient required an extension of the initial incision for anastomosis. Mean operation time and blood loss were 194 min and 272 ml, respectively. One patient developed an intra-abdominal abscess postoperatively. Postoperative fluorography revealed no anastomosis leakage or stenosis in any of the patients. Patients resumed an oral liquid diet on postoperative day 3–5, and the mean postoperative hospital stay was 11 days.

Conclusions

We have successfully performed LTG with Roux-en-Y reconstruction using our technique in 16 patients without any anastomosis complications. We believe that our procedure is a secure and reliable reconstruction method after LTG, which is especially useful in obese patients, in whom conventional extracorporeal anastomosis often is difficult.     

Management of pyloric stricture in children: endoscopic balloon dilatation and surgery

Background

Surgical correction is the most preferred treatment modality in pyloric stricture (PS). Recently a few studies reported the experience of balloon dilation in children with PS. This study was designed to present our experiences of the management of the patients with PS with balloon dilation and corrective surgery.

Methods

The records of 14 patients who were treated with the diagnosis of PS between August 2003 and August 2011 were reviewed retrospectively.

Results

There were nine boys and five girls (mean age, 3.4?±?1.7?years). The history of caustic ingestion was detected in eight patients; six of them were admitted on the day of ingestion. Two patients were admitted with nonbilious vomiting more than 2?weeks after ingestion. Four patients did not have a remarkable medical history, including caustic ingestion. They admitted with the complaint of nonbilious vomiting. PS was detected during endoscopy in two patients who had a diagnosis of peptic ulcer disease. PS was shown by barium meal study in all patients. Endoscopy was performed in all patients. Endoscopic balloon dilation was tried in 12 patients. Overall eight patients required surgical procedures for PS. The complaints were resolved by endoscopic balloon dilation of pylorus in the remaining six patients.

Conclusions

Although endoscopic balloon dilatation for benign PS in adults is a generally accepted method of treatment, there is less experience with endoscopic balloon dilatation for PS in children. PS due to benign disorders can be effectively and successfully treated through endoscopic balloon dilatation in suitable patients. In patients with successful pyloric balloon dilatation, surgery can be avoided.     

Successful management of gastrojejunal strictures after gastric bypass: is timing important?

BackgroundEndoscopic balloon dilation is an effective treatment of gastrojejunal (GJ) strictures after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), although its success might depend on the point at which they occur postoperatively. We hypothesized that “late” strictures (≥90 d after RYGB) might be less amenable to balloon dilations than “early” strictures occurring within 90 days postoperatively.MethodsA review of a prospectively maintained database at a bariatric center was conducted to identify all patients who underwent upper endoscopy (UE) for investigation of gastrointestinal symptoms after RYGB. Those who were diagnosed with a GJ anastomotic stricture at endoscopy were selected for additional evaluation. The patients were classified into 1 of 3 groups, according to the point at which they presented with stricture symptoms (group 1, 0–90 d after RYGB; group 2, 91–365 d after RYGB; and group 3, >1 yr after RYGB). All strictures were dilated using through-the-scope controlled radial expansion balloons.ResultsFrom July 2006 to July 2009, 929 RYGB procedures were performed in our bariatric unit. Our surgical endoscopy team performs approximately 1500 UE investigations annually. Most investigations were for preoperative assessment of bariatric patients; however, a proportion is indicated for the investigation of postoperative weight regain and complications of foregut surgery, as well as endoluminal surgery. In the present study period, 591 gastric bypass patients underwent UE for investigation of gastrointestinal symptoms postoperatively. In total, 72 patients were diagnosed with a symptomatic GJ anastomotic stricture and underwent balloon dilation. Almost two thirds (63.9%) of the dilations were performed within 90 days after RYGB; 98% of these “early” strictures resolved with dilation. In comparison, of the “late” strictures, only 61% (16 of 26 patients) resolved and 38.5% (n = 10) required revisional surgery for additional management.ConclusionEndoscopic balloon dilation is effective in treating early GJ strictures after RYGB. Late strictures are less amenable to endoscopic dilation and often require revisional surgery. Patients presenting with upper gastrointestinal symptoms after RYGB warrant early investigation with UE to investigate for a GJ stricture, which if present, should be promptly dilated.     

Endoscopic Management of Ureteral Strictures: an Update

Purpose of Review

This review focuses on the role of endoscopic treatment of ureteral stricture disease (USD) in the era of minimally invasive surgery.

Recent Findings

There is a relative paucity of recent literature regarding the endoscopic treatment of USD. Laser endopyelotomy and balloon dilation are associated with good outcomes in treatment-naïve patients with short (<?2 cm), non-ischemic, benign ureteral strictures with a functional renal unit. If stricture recurs, repetitive dilation and laser endopyleotomy is not recommended, as success rates are low in this scenario. Patients with low-complexity ureteroenteric strictures and transplant strictures may benefit from endoscopic treatment options, although formal reconstruction offers higher rates of success.

Summary

Formal ureteral reconstruction remains the gold-standard treatment for ureteral stricture disease as it is associated with higher rates of complete resolution. However, in carefully selected patients, endoscopic treatment modalities provide a low-cost, low-morbidity alternative.

     

Stenosis after use of the double-stapling technique for reconstruction after laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy

Background

The double-stapling technique (DST) for esophagojejunostomy using the transorally inserted anvil (OrVil; Covidien Japan, Tokyo, Japan) is one of the reconstruction methods used after laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy (LATG). This technique has potential advantages in terms of less invasive surgery without the need to create a complicated intraabdominal anastomosis.

Methods

From 2008 to 2011, 262 patients with gastric cancer underwent total gastrectomy and reconstruction with a Roux-en-Y anastomosis, and 52 patients underwent LATG with DST. A retrospective analysis then was performed comparing the patients who experienced postoperative stenosis after LATG-DST (positive group) and the patients who did not (negative group). A comparative analysis was performed among patients comparing conventional open total gastrectomy and LATG, and multivariate analysis was performed to evaluate risk factors for the development of anastomotic stenosis.

Results

A minor leak was found in 1 patient (1.9 %), and 11 patients experienced anastomotic stenosis (21 %) after LATG with DST. Among the patients with anastomotic stenosis, three (3/4, 75 %) anastomoses were performed with the 21-mm end-to-end anastomosis (EEA) stapler, and eight anastomoses were performed (8/47, 17 %) with the 25-mm EEA stapler. The median interval to the diagnosis of anastomotic stenosis was 43 days after surgery. The patients with stenosis needed endoscopic balloon dilation an average of four times, and the rate of perforation after dilation was 13 %. The clinical and operative characteristics did not differ between the two groups. Anastomotic stenosis after open total gastrectomy occurred in two cases (0.98 %). Multivariate analysis showed that the size of the EEA stapler and the use of DST were risk factors for anastomotic stenosis.

Conclusion

Esophagojejunostomy using DST with OrVil is useful in performing a minimally invasive procedure but carries a high risk of anastomotic stenosis.     

Does Robotic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Provide Outcome Advantages over Standard Laparoscopic Approaches?

Objective

The aim was to compare clinical outcomes of patients treated with totally robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (TRRYGB) with those treated with the different laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) techniques.

Summary Background Data

The clinical benefit of the robotic approach to bariatric surgery compared to the standard laparoscopic approach is unclear. There are no studies directly comparing outcomes of TRRYGB with different LRYGB techniques.

Methods

Outcomes of 578 obese patients who underwent RYGB between 2011 and 2014 at an academic center were assessed. Multivariable analysis and propensity matching were used for comparing TRRYGB to different LRYGB techniques, including 21-mm EEA circular-stapled gastrojejunal anastomosis (GJA, LRYGB-21CS), linear-stapled GJA (LRYGB-LS), and hand-sewn GJA (LRYGB-HS).

Results

The TRRYGB technique required a longer mean operative time compared to the other groups, respectively 204?±?46 vs. 139?±?30 min (LRYGB-21CS), 206?±?37 vs. 158?±?30 min (LRYGB-LS), and 210?±?36 vs. 167?±?30 min (LRYGB-HS). TRRYGB experienced a lower stricture rate (2 vs. 17%, P?=?0.003), shorter hospital stay (2.6?±?1.2 vs. 4.3?±?5.5 days, P?=?0.008), and lower readmission rate (12 vs. 28%, P?=?0.009). No significant differences in outcomes were observed when comparing RRYGB to LRYGB-LS or LRYGB-HS.

Conclusions

TRRYGB increases operative time compared to all LRYGB techniques. TRRYGB was superior to LRYGB-21CS in terms of significantly shorter hospital stay, lower readmission rate, and less frequent GJA stricture formation. TRRYGB provides no clinical advantages over the LRYGB-LS and LRYGB-HS techniques.