Phase I trial of UFT/leucovorin and irinotecan in patients with advanced cancer

UFT (BMS-200604, Uftoral) is an oral fluoropyrimidine that combines uracil and the 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) prodrug, ftorafur, in a 4:1 molar ratio with single-agent activity in breast and gastrointestinal cancers. In vitro studies have shown that irinotecan downregulates thymidylate synthase (TS) expression in tumour cells, leading to synergy between irinotecan and 5-FU that is maximal when irinotecan is given 24 h prior to 5-FU. Given this observed synergy and the confirmatory clinical activity of combination therapy with 5-FU, leucovorin (LV) and irinotecan, we performed a phase I trial to determine the maximum tolerated doses (MTD) of UFT, LV, and irinotecan. Treatment consisted of irinotecan administered as a 90-min intravenous (i.v.) infusion on day 1 followed by twice daily oral UFT/LV on days 2-15, repeated every 21 days. Initial doses were irinotecan 200 mg/m(2) and UFT 200 mg/m(2)/day, with LV dose fixed at 60 mg/day. 31 patients received a total of 130 cycles of UFT/LV and irinotecan. 3 of 9 patients experienced grade 3/4 diarrhoea at the highest dose level of irinotecan 310 mg/m(2) and UFT 300 mg/m(2)/day. Other toxicities included neutropenia, anaemia, alopecia, nausea/vomiting and fatigue. Further dose escalation was not pursued since this level of toxicity was appropriate for future phase II study. One patient with colorectal cancer experienced a partial response and 9 patients with non-small cell lung, colorectal and gastro-oesophageal junction carcinomas had disease stabilisation lasting 4-26 (median 6) cycles. Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) C677T genotype was analysed in peripheral mononuclear cells (PMNs) obtained from 24 patients. 2 patients had the homozygous TT polymorphism and 1 of them had grade 3 diarrhoea at the first dose level. Irinotecan on day 1 followed by a 14-day course of oral UFT/LV beginning on day 2 is well tolerated, and suitable for testing in several tumour types. Doses recommended for further study on this schedule are irinotecan 310 mg/m(2) and UFT 300 mg/m(2)/day, with LV 60 mg/day.     

Oral uracil/ftorafur (UFT) plus leucovorin as first-line chemotherapy and salvage therapy with weekly high-dose 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy and toxicity of uracil/ftorafur (UFT) plus oral leucovorin (LV) as first-line chemotherapy for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer and salvage chemotherapy with weekly high-dose 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/LV 24 h infusion. METHODS: Adult patients with no prior chemotherapy for metastatic diseases were enrolled to receive oral UFT 300 mg/m(2)/d plus LV 90 mg/d for 28 days. Treatment was given continuously for 28 days followed by a 7 day rest period from all treatment. For UFT failed patients, weekly 24 h infusion of 5-FU 2600 mg/m(2) plus LV 100 mg/m(2) was used as salvage therapy. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients with metastatic colorectal cancer were enrolled in the study. The objective response rate was 29.5% [95% confidence interval (CI), 16.8-45.2%] among the 44 evaluable patients and 25.5% in the intent-to-treat population. The median survival for all 51 patients was 16.6 months. The median time to progression was 5.9 months. Diarrhea was the major adverse effect of UFT/LV that made patients reduce dosage. Grade 3 or 4 diarrhea developed in 13.7% of patients. Twenty-six patients were treated with weekly 24 h infusional 5-FU/LV as salvage therapy and only two patients responded. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that this 28 day schedule of UFT/LV regimen may offer a well-tolerated, full oral treatment option with efficacy that appears comparable to that of intravenous 5-FU/LV regimens. Parenteral 5-FU/LV as salvage therapy for UFT refractory patients is not recommended.     

Multicenter phase III study of uracil/tegafur and oral leucovorin versus fluorouracil and leucovorin in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: This phase III study was designed to demonstrate equivalence in survival of oral uracil/tegafur (UFT) and oral leucovorin (LV) to conventional intravenous (IV) fluorouracil (5-FU) and LV in previously untreated metastatic colorectal carcinoma. Safety was also compared. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eight hundred sixteen patients were randomized to receive either UFT (300 mg/m(2)/d) and LV (75 or 90 mg/d) for 28 days every 35 days or IV bolus 5-FU (425 mg/m(2)/d) and LV (20 mg/m(2)/d) for 5 days every 28 days. RESULTS: UFT/LV produced survival comparable to the IV 5-FU/LV regimen. Median survival was 12.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 11.2 to 13.6 months) with UFT/LV and 13.4 months (95% CI, 11.6 to 15.4 months) with 5-FU/LV (P =.630). The hazard ratio for survival was 0.964 (95.6% CI, 0.826 to 1.125), supporting equivalent survival. The overall response rate did not differ between treatment arms (UFT/LV, 11.7%; 5-FU/LV, 14.5%; P =.232). Median time to progression favored 5-FU/LV (UFT/LV, 3.5 months; 5-FU/LV, 3.8 months; P =.011), but tumor assessment schedules differed between arms. UFT/LV significantly improved safety compared with 5-FU/LV. Diarrhea, nausea and vomiting, and stomatitis and mucositis were significantly less frequent with UFT/LV, as was myelosuppression. Patients treated with UFT/LV had fewer episodes of febrile neutropenia (P <.001) and documented infections (P <.05). Increased bilirubin, without other liver function abnormalities, was observed more often with UFT/LV (P <.001). Concomitant medications were more frequent with 5-FU/LV, including use of antibiotics, growth factors, and antiemetics. CONCLUSION: UFT/LV provided a safer, more convenient oral alternative to a standard bolus IV 5-FU/LV regimen for metastatic colorectal cancer while producing equivalent survival.     

Bioavailability and phase II study of oral UFT plus leucovorin in patients with relapsed or refractory colorectal cancer

Purpose: This study was undertaken to address the influence of concurrent administration on the pharmacokinetics of UFT (uracil plus tegafur) and leucovorin (LV), and to measure the antitumor activity of a 28-consecutive-day oral regimen of UFT plus LV in patients with relapsed or refractory colorectal cancer. Methods: Patients with advanced measurable colorectal cancer who had failed previous therapy with intravenous bolus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) were eligible. Patients were treated with UFT 300 mg/m² per day plus LV 90 mg per day in three divided doses every 8 h for 28 days, repeated at 35-day intervals. In addition, a three-treatment by three-period crossover bioavailability comparison of oral LV 30 mg plus UFT 200 mg versus either LV or UFT alone was scheduled for the 8 days preceding the first cycle of therapy. Results: Of 19 patients enrolled, 18 were assessable for pharmacokinetics and response. When LV was coadministered with UFT, there were no statistically significant effects on tegafur, uracil, or 5-FU C_max, AUC, or T_max, with the exception of a delayed T_max for tegafur (P = 0.03). No statistically significant differences were found in LV and 5-methyltetrahydrofolate plasma levels when LV was administered alone or with UFT. However, wide interpatient variability was observed for all parameters. There were no antitumor responses seen. Conclusions: Although the T_max for tegafur is delayed with the concurrent administration of LV, there were no differences (P > 0.05) in any pharmacologic parameters that are of likely clinical significance. However, the great interpatient variability observed in UFT and LV pharmacology may have obscured true bioavailability effects in this small patient population. Daily oral UFT plus LV is inactive as second-line therapy in patients who have failed bolus 5-FU. Received: 13 March 1998 / Accepted: 1 June 1998     

Home chemotherapy by concomitant UFT + Leucovorin (po.) in postoperative colorectal cancer patients assessed with Dukes D and curability C colorectal cancer

Concomitant treatment with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and Leucovorin (LV) is positioned as the standard chemotherapy against colorectal cancer. We noted the action of LV to enhance the effect of biochemical modulation by 5-FU, and made an attempt at home chemotherapy with UFT + LV by oral administration, in consideration to the convenience of patients. SUBJECTS: The subjects of this study were 24 post-operative patients who had been assessed with Dukes D and curability C colorectal cancer with measurable metastatic lesions and who could tolerate chemotherapy. METHODS: 1 course of treatment consisted of 2 weeks of UFT at 300-400 mg/m2/day and LV at 15 mg/body/day followed by 2 weeks of drug withdrawal. The administration was conducted for 4 courses or more as the target. Unless serious adverse reaction occurred, dose increase of UFT was allowed. RESULTS: The efficacy rate in the 22 patients who were assessable was 22.7%. There were 11 NC patients, accounting for half (50%) of the subjects. This home chemotherapy is expected to become an alternative chemotherapy against colorectal cancer in the future, because the treatment does not require hospitalization and has less impact on the QOL of patients.     

Randomized comparative study of tegafur/uracil and oral leucovorin versus parenteral fluorouracil and leucovorin in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: This phase III study compared the time to progression (TTP) of an oral regimen of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase inhibitory fluoropyrimidine composed of a fixed combination of tegafur and uracil in a 1:4 molar ratio (UFT) and leucovorin (LV) to intravenous (IV) fluorouracil (5-FU) and LV in previously untreated metastatic colorectal carcinoma (CRC) patients. Secondary end points were survival, tumor response, safety, and quality of life. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between May 1996 and July 1997, 380 patients were randomized to receive either UFT (300 mg/m(2)/d) and LV (90 mg/d), administered for 28 days every 35 days, or 5-FU (425 mg/m(2)/d) and LV (20 mg/m(2)/d), given IV for 5 days every 35 days. RESULTS: No statistically significant difference in TTP was observed between treatments. With 320 events assessed, the median TTP was 3.4 months (95% Confidence interval [CI], 2.6 to 3.8) on UFT/LV and 3.3 months (95% CI, 2.5 to 3.7) on 5-FU/LV (P =.591, stratified log-rank test). There were no statistically significant differences in survival, tumor response, duration of response, and time to response. Substantial safety benefits were observed in patients treated with UFT/LV. They experienced significantly less stomatitis/mucositis (P <.001) and myelosuppression, resulting in fewer episodes of febrile neutropenia (P <.001) and less documented infection (P =.04). Concomitant medication usage was significantly greater on 5-FU/LV (P =.010). With respect to quality of life, after correcting for baseline imbalances, there were no significant differences between treatments for any scale, except diarrhea. CONCLUSION: The oral UFT/LV regimen failed to achieve improved TTP; however, the study confirms significant safety improvements compared with bolus IV 5-FU/LV for the first-line treatment of metastatic CRC.     

Effect of food on the oral bioavailability of UFT and leucovorin in cancer patients.

UFT is composed of tegafur (FT), a prodrug of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), and uracil in a fixed combination (1:4). In conjunction with leucovorin, UFT is being developed for the first-line oral treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. The effect of food on the oral bioavailability of UFT (2 x 100 mg capsules; dose in terms of FT) and leucovorin (2 x 15 mg tablets) was evaluated in a single-dose, randomized, two-way crossover study. Patients (n = 25) were assigned to receive both drugs after an overnight fast or 5 min after completion of a high-fat meal (721 calories) with a 3-day washout period between treatments; then they were permitted to continue on oral UFT/leucovorin therapy for safety assessment. UFT (300 mg/m2/day as three divided doses) and leucovorin (90 mg/day as three divided doses) were given for 28 days. After a 7-day rest, the 28-day cycle was repeated. Pharmacokinetics (n = 22 patients) were determined for FT, 5-FU, uracil, leucovorin, and 5-methyltetrahydrofolate (an active metabolite of leucovorin). The absence of food-effect on peak plasma concentration (CMAX) and the area under the curve (AUC) was concluded if the 90% confidence interval for the ratio of the treatment means was entirely contained in 0.75-1.33. Administration of UFT with food resulted in a 34% decrease in CMAX of FT, whereas the AUC of FT remained unchanged. Food decreased the CMAX and AUC values of uracil and 5-FU by 37-76%. On the contrary, the CMAX and AUC values of leucovorin and 5-methyltetrahydrofolate were increased by 14-60% with food. Time to reach CMAX for all analytes was significantly (P < or = 0.001) delayed by food. Except for the AUCs of FT, the statistical criterion for concluding a lack of food-effect was not met. These data suggest that UFT/leucovorin should not be dosed simultaneously with food. It is recommended that food should not be consumed for 1 h before and after an oral dose of UFT and leucovorin in a manner similar to pivotal Phase III trials. The 28-day oral regimen of UFT and leucovorin was generally well tolerated in the population studied.     

A randomised cross-over trial comparing patient preference for oral capecitabine and 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin regimens in patients with advanced colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Traditionally, metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC) has been treated with intravenous (i.v.) 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (5-FU/LV). The tumour-activated, oral fluoropyrimidine capecitabine demonstrates superior activity and favourable safety compared with the Mayo regimen, while potentially avoiding the complications and inconvenience associated with i.v. regimens. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Ninety-seven patients with previously untreated advanced/MCRC were randomised to receive capecitabine followed by i.v. 5-FU/LV [Mayo Clinic, in-patient de Gramont (IPdG) or out-patient modified de Gramont (OPdG) regimens], or i.v. 5-FU/LV followed by capecitabine. RESULTS: Before treatment, of those patients for whom a preference was recorded, almost all (95%) preferred oral treatment (consistent across all treatment groups) and the majority retained this preference after treatment (64% overall; 86%, 63% and 50% in the Mayo, IPdG and OPdG groups, respectively). Following treatment, the principal reasons for oral treatment preference were increased convenience, home-based administration and tablet formulation. Treatment satisfaction was significantly higher with capecitabine compared with Mayo (P<0.05) and with OPdG compared with capecitabine (P<0.05). Quality of life (QoL) was largely constant across the regimens, although it appeared better with OPdG than capecitabine (P<0.05). Grade 3/4 adverse events were uncommon in all arms. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirmed that the majority of patients with MCRC prefer oral to i.v. therapy, although the OPdG regimen appears to be the most popular i.v. option. Capecitabine clearly represents an effective, well-tolerated oral alternative to i.v. 5-FU/LV.     

Effect of leucovorin on the antitumor efficacy of the 5-FU prodrug, tegafur-uracil, in human colorectal cancer xenografts with various expression levels of thymidylate synthase

The combination of oral tegafur-uracil (UFT) with leucovorin (LV) is used to treat patients with stage II to III colon cancer based on the results of postoperative randomized studies in which UFT/LV treatment showed an equivalent efficacy to intravenous 5-FU plus LV therapy. However, whether the addition of LV to UFT can elevate the antitumor activity of UFT in colorectal tumors with high expression levels of thymidylate synthase (TS), which affects 5-FU efficacy, remains to be clarified. This study investigated the effect of LV on the antitumor activity of UFT and/or 5-FU prodrugs in low folate diet-fed nude mice using human colorectal cancer xenografts with various expression levels of TS. The addition of LV to UFT resulted in a 55-79% inhibition of tumor growth among 11 types of colorectal tumor xenograft, whereas UFT alone showed 23-67% antitumor activity. Although there was an inverse relationship between the antitumor effect of UFT alone and UFT plus LV and tumoral TS activity, UFT plus LV appeared to have a more potent antitumor effect than UFT alone on colorectal tumors such as Co-3 and KM12C/5-FU with high expression levels of TS. This finding was confirmed by the significant positive correlation between the relative inhibition ratio of UFT/LV to UFT alone and TS levels in tumors. To investigate the reason for the higher efficacy of UFT/LV on colorectal cancer xenografts with high TS activity, intratumoral levels of reduced folates and a ternary complex of TS after oral UFT with or without LV were measured using Co-3 xenografts. Elevated levels of reduced folates and an increased ternary complex of TS in LV-treated tumors were noted. Our results indicate that a combined therapy of UFT with LV may contribute to the treatment of colorectal cancer patients with low and high expression levels of tumoral TS by increased formation of the ternary complex of TS leading to potentiated antitumor efficacy of UFT.     

Oral capecitabine as an alternative to i.v. 5-fluorouracil-based adjuvant therapy for colon cancer: safety results of a randomized, phase III trial.

BACKGROUND: Oral capecitabine achieves a superior response rate with an improved safety profile compared with bolus 5-fluorouracil-leucovorin (5-FU/LV) as first-line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. We report here the results of a large phase III trial investigating adjuvant oral capecitabine compared with 5-FU/LV (Mayo Clinic regimen) in Dukes' C colon cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients aged 18-75 years with resected Dukes' C colon carcinoma were randomized to receive 24 weeks of treatment with either oral capecitabine 1250 mg/m(2) twice daily, days 1-14 every 21 days (n = 993), or i.v. bolus 5-FU 425 mg/m(2) with i.v. leucovorin 20 mg/m(2) on days 1-5, repeated every 28 days (n = 974). RESULTS: Patients receiving capecitabine experienced significantly (P <0.001) less diarrhea, stomatitis, nausea/vomiting, alopecia and neutropenia, but more hand-foot syndrome than those receiving 5-FU/LV. Fewer patients receiving capecitabine experienced grade 3 or 4 neutropenia, febrile neutropenia/sepsis and stomatitis (P <0.001), although more experienced grade 3 hand-foot syndrome than those treated with 5-FU/LV (P <0.001). Capecitabine demonstrates a similar, favorable safety profile in patients aged <65 years or > or = 65 years old. CONCLUSIONS: Based on its improved safety profile, capecitabine has the potential to replace 5-FU/LV as standard adjuvant treatment for patients with colon cancer. Efficacy results are expected to be available in Keywords: Adjuvant treatment, capecitabine, chemotherapy, colorectal cancer     

New combination therapies for gastrointestinal cancer

Recently, cisplation (CDDP) and CPT-11 have joined the other drugs used for gastrointestinal chemotherapy, and the combination of I-leucovorin (I-LV)/5-FU has become available for use in medical treatment in Japan. This enables doctors to make a variety of regimens for gastrointestinal cancers. In this paper, we explain the new combinations, especially LV/5-FU/platinum, CPT-11/CDDP, and LV/5-FU/CPT-11. The combination of 5-FU/LV/CPT-11 has shown a higher antitumor activity than 5-FU/LV alone, with increased progression free survival or time-to-treatment failure. This combination will be considered the new standard regimen for colorectal cancer. It is worthy of note that the combination of UFT/LV provided on equally effective but safe and more convenient oral alternative to the standard i.v. 5-FU/LV regimen for colorectal cancer.     

Ongoing Colorectal Cancer Adjuvant Trials in Japan

In Japan, oral fluoropyrimidines have been used widely as adjuvant therapy for colorectal cancers. The 2009 Japanese guideline recommends uracil-tegafur (UFT) and capecitabine, in addition to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/leucovorin (LV), as adjuvant therapy for colorectal cancer. At present, seven studies are being conducted in Japan; all are evaluating the efficacy of oral fluoropyrimidines. The SACURA and Japanese Foundation for Multidisciplinary Treatment of Cancer (JFMC)38-0901 trials are investigating the efficacy of UFT and UFT plus polysaccharide K compared with surgery alone for stage II colorectal cancer. The Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG)-0205 trial is evaluating the equivalence of UFT/LV and infusional 5-FU/LV for the treatment of stage III colorectal cancer. The ACTS-CC trial is evaluating the noninferiority of S-1 compared with UFT/LV, whereas the JFMC35-C1 (ACTS-RC) trial is designed to evaluate the superiority of oral S-1 compared with UFT/LV in stage II and III rectal cancer patients. The JFMC37-0801 and JFMC33-0502 trials are evaluating the optimal duration of adjuvant chemotherapy with either capecitabine or UFT/LV.     

Capecitabine (Xeloda) improves medical resource use compared with 5-fluorouracil plus leucovorin in a phase III trial conducted in patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma

Standard therapy for advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer consists of 5-fluorouracil plus leucovorin (5-FU/LV) administered intravenously (i.v.). Capecitabine (Xeloda), an oral fluoropyrimidine carbamate which is preferentially activated by thymidine phosphorylase in tumour cells, mimics continuous 5-FU and is a recently developed alternative to i.v. 5-FU/LV. The choice of oral rather than intravenous treatment may affect medical resource use because the two regimens do not require the same intensity of medical intervention for drug administration, and have different toxicity profiles. Here we examine medical resource use in the first-line treatment of colorectal cancer patients with capecitabine compared with those receiving the Mayo Clinic regimen of 5-FU/LV. In a prospective, randomised phase III clinical trial, 602 patients with advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer recruited from 59 centres worldwide were randomised to treatment with either capecitabine or the Mayo regimen of 5-FU/LV. In addition to clinical efficacy and safety endpoints, data were collected on hospital visits required for drug administration, hospital admissions, and drugs and unscheduled consultations with physicians required for the treatment of adverse events. Capecitabine treatment in comparison to 5-FU/LV in advanced colorectal carcinoma resulted in superior response rates (26.6% versus 17.9%, P=0.013) and improved safety including less stomatitis and myelosuppression. Capecitabine patients required substantially fewer hospital visits for drug administration than 5-FU/LV patients. Medical resource use analysis showed that patients treated with capecitabine spent fewer days in hospital for the management of treatment related adverse events than did patients treated with 5-FU/LV. In addition, capecitabine reduced the requirement for expensive drugs, in particular antimicrobials fluconazole and 5-HT3-antagonists to manage adverse events. As anticipated with an oral home-based therapy patients receiving capecitabine needed more frequent unscheduled home, day care, office and telephone consultations with physicians. In the light of clinical results from the phase III trial demonstrating increased efficacy in terms of response rate, equivalent time to progression (TTP) and survival (OS), and a superior safety profile, the results from this medical resource assessment indicate that capecitabine treatment of colorectal cancer patients results in a substantial resource use saving relative to the Mayo Clinic regimen of 5-FU/LV. This benefit is derived principally from the avoidance of hospital visits for i.v. drug administration, less expensive drug therapy for the treatment of toxic side-effects, and fewer treatment-related hospitalisations required during the course of therapy for adverse drug reactions in comparison to patients treated with 5-FU/LV.     

Phase II study of gemcitabine, UFT and leucovorin in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer

The combination of gemcitabine with protracted 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in the treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer has shown activity with tolerable toxicity. The administration of UFT may simulate the effects of a protracted infusion of 5-FU. Patients with previously untreated metastatic or unresectable measurable pancreatic adenocarcinoma received gemcitabine (800 mg/m2 i.v., administered as an 80-min infusion on days 1, 8 and 15), UFT (200 mg/m2/day, on days 1 to 21), and oral leucovorin (90 mg/day, on days 1 to 21). Thirty patients were enrolled in this study. Five patients had partial responses, with an overall response rate of 17% (5/30), using the intent-to-treat principle (95% confidence interval (CI), 3-30%). Nine out of 25 (36%) patients experienced clinical benefit responses (95% CI; 17-55%). The median time to progression was 3.0 months, and the median overall survival was 7.2 months. The principal adverse event was neutropenia. The combination of gemcitabine, UFT, plus oral leucovorin shows significant antitumor activity and a beneficial clinical effect with an acceptable level of toxicity.     

Effect of 5-Fluorouracil and UFT on Experimental Liver Metastasis Model of Colorectal Cancer Using Mouse Colon 26 Cells

Effects of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and UFT on an experimental liver metastasis model were compared at equi-effective dosage levels against subcutaneous tumor of mouse colon 26. 5-FU at the dosage level of 40 mg/kg suppressed the subcutaneous tumor growth by 70.0% and 45.0% on day 13 and day 18, respectively, and UFT at 20 mg/kg provided almost equal suppression (63.0% and 48.0%). In the liver metastasis model, 5-FU at 40 mg/kg showed more potent prevention of the formation of metastatic foci (94.9%) than did UFT (60.4%) at 20 mg/kg. 5-FU at 40 mg/kg produced a much higher peak serum level of 5-FU than did UFT at 20 mg/kg and also showed a much higher AUC (area under the curve) level in the portal blood. These results suggest that oral administration of 5-FU might be useful in prevention of liver metastasis of colorectal cancer.     

Phase II Study of Gemcitabine, UFT and Leucovorin in Patients with Advanced Pancreatic Cancer

The combination of gemcitabine with protracted 5-fluorouracil(5-FU) in the treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer has shown activity with tolerable toxicity. The administration of UFT may simulate the effects of a protracted infusion of 5-FU. Patients with previously untreated metastatic or unresectable measurable pancreatic adenocarcinoma received gemcitabine (800 mg/m2 i.v., administered as an 80-min infusion on days 1, 8 and 15), UFT (200 mg/m2/day, on days 1 to 21), and oral leucovorin (90 mg/day, on days 1 to 21). Thirty patients were enrolled in this study. Five patients had partial responses, with an overall response rate of 17% (5/30), using the intent-to-treat principle (95% confidence interval (CI), 3-30%). Nine out of 25 (36%) patients experienced clinical benefit responses (95% CI; 17-55%). The median time to progression was 3.0 months, and the median overall survival was 7.2 months. The principal adverse event was neutropenia. The combination of gemcitabine, UFT, plus oral leucovorin shows significant antitumor activity and a beneficial clinical effect with an acceptable level of toxicity.     

Results of pharmacokinetic modulating chemotherapy in combination with hepatic arterial 5-fluorouracil infusion and oral UFT after resection of hepatic colorectal metastases

BACKGROUND: Pharmacokinetic modulating chemotherapy (PMC) is a new therapeutic concept in combination with continuous 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) infusion and UFT. UFT enhanced plasma 5-FU concentration and antitumor effects during 5-FU infusion. The authors report on their experiences with arterial 5-FU infusion and UFT after resection of hepatic colorectal secondaries. METHODS: Fifty-eight patients were divided into two groups after hepatectomy. Group A, 30 patients, underwent hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) via implantable port system with perfusion 5-FU for 2 consecutive days per week at 600 mg/m(2)/day, and oral administration of UFT at 400 mg/day for 5-7 days per week, repeated 10 times, and Group B, 28 patients, underwent oral administration of UFT at 400 mg/day for 6 months. All the patients were managed at the outpatient clinic at Hyogo College of Medicine, and recurrence, survival, and toxicity were documented. Plasma 5-FU concentrations during chemotherapy were detected using high performance liquid chromatography. RESULTS: Maximum plasma concentrations of 5-FU in Group A reached 144.0 ng/mL and in Group B 58.7 ng/mL. Cumulative 5-year survival rate after hepatectomy in Group A was 59% and in Group B was 27%. (P = 0.00001) HAI-PMC drastically decreased hepatic recurrence (median hepatic recurrence free times were 34.2 months in Group A vs. 18.4 months in Group B; P = 0.00002). Grade 3 toxicity in Group A was found in 3 patients CONCLUSIONS: Pharmacokinetic modulating chemotherapy was designed as a uracil-related biochemical modulation. HAI-PMC significantly decreased hepatic recurrence after curative resection. This new chemotherapy concept significantly improved prognosis in patients with hepatic colorectal metastases.     

Tegafur and uracil plus leucovorin in advanced colorectal cancer: a phase II trial

The objective of this study was to evaluate the activity and toxicity of tegafur and uracil (UFT; 1:4 molar ratio) plus leucovorin (LV) in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. One hundred forty-one patients were entered into the study. The treatment schedule consisted of UFT 300 mg/m2/day (in three divided doses) plus oral LV 150 mg/day (50 mg t.i.d.) over 28 days. The treatment cycle was repeated every 5 weeks until progression or unacceptable toxicity was observed. The treatment was interrupted if grade 3/4 toxicity appeared and was resumed at the same dosage on recovery. One hundred thirty-six patients were evaluable for response and 141 were evaluable for toxicity. The response rate was 19.9% (95% confidence interval: 12%-28%). The total number of patients without progression (objective response + stable disease) was 76 (55.9%). The median time to progression was 5.6 months, and the overall survival was 11.6 months. The toxicity profile was low, with 11% of patients experiencing grade 3/4 nausea and vomiting, while 17% had grade 3/4 diarrhea. Oral administration of UFT modulated with LV is a comfortable regimen of chemotherapy for patients with advanced colorectal cancer.     

Association of right-sided tumors with high thymidine phosphorylase gene expression levels and the response to oral uracil and tegafur/leucovorin chemotherapy among patients with colorectal cancer

Purpose

To identify useful predictive factors for the response to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/leucovorin (LV) and oral uracil and tegafur (UFT)/LV chemotherapy among patients with colorectal cancer, we investigated the association between the gene expression levels of pyrimidine and folate metabolism-related enzymes in colorectal cancer (CRC) tissues and the response to UFT/LV neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Methods

The subjects were 76 CRC patients who were scheduled to undergo surgery. UFT (300?mg/m²/day) and LV (75?mg/body/day) were administered for 2 weeks before surgery. Biopsy samples were endoscopically obtained before drug administration. The gene expression levels of 14 genes in the biopsy samples were quantitatively evaluated using a real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay.

Results

Fifteen patients (19.7?%) with marked pathological regression were judged to be responders. Thymidine phosphorylase (TP) gene expression levels among the responders were significantly higher than those among the non-responders. Right-sided tumors with high TP gene expression levels were associated with a significantly higher response rate to UFT/LV chemotherapy than left-sided tumors.

Conclusions

TP gene expression levels in primary CRC tissues and the primary tumor site may be useful predictors of the efficacy of oral UFT/LV chemotherapy.