Differences between recognition and resolution acuity in patients undergoing macular hole surgery

PURPOSE: The present investigation compared recognition acuities (ETDRS chart) with resolution acuities (Landolt-C chart) in a sample of patients with idiopathic macular holes (MH). Traditionally, visual acuity in a clinical setting is measured with a letter chart. Yet, the ability to recognize a letter differs from a resolution task, such as detecting the direction of a gap in a ring. It was hypothesized that resolution acuity would be more impaired than recognition acuity in patients with MH, because component cues in letter optotypes are not available in Landolt-Cs. METHOD: Visual acuities of 23 patients with MH (age range, 52-82) were tested, using standard ETDRS and Landolt-C charts. Optical coherence tomography was used to confirm the diagnosis of MH. RESULTS: Acuities correlated strongly, before and after surgery (r = 0.92 and r = 0.95, respectively). However, paired t-tests determined that resolution acuity was significantly more impaired at both time points than was recognition acuity (P < 0.001). Using Bland-Altman plots, the limits of agreement between the two acuity types indicated that resolution acuity differed from recognition acuity by up to five lines before surgery and up to 3 lines after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: ETDRS and Landolt-C acuities differ in a clinically significant way in patients before and after MH surgery. Measuring recognition acuity by reading letters may lead to an overestimate of visual ability at the retinal level in patients with MH by including compensatory top-down cognitive processes that are unavailable for resolution tasks.     

Threshold visual acuity testing of preschool children using the crowded HOTV and Lea Symbols acuity tests

PURPOSE: To compare the testability and threshold acuity levels for very young children on the crowded HOTV logMAR distance visual acuity test presented on the BVAT apparatus and the Lea Symbols logMAR distance visual acuity chart. METHODS: Subjects were 87 Head Start children from age 3 to 3.5 years. Testing consisted of binocular pretraining at near using a lap card as needed, binocular pretraining at 3 m, and threshold testing for each eye. The testing procedure, adapted from the Amblyopia Treatment Study, presented optotypes until the child was unable to correctly name or match three of three or three of four optotypes of a given size. Threshold acuity was the smallest size for which at least three optotypes were correctly identified. RESULTS: Both near and distance pretraining were completed by 71% of children for HOTV and by 75% for Lea Symbols (P =.39). The distribution of threshold acuities differed between the two tests. For the 69 eyes of 53 children who were successfully tested with both optotypes, results from the crowded HOTV acuity test were on average 0.25 logMar (2.5 lines) better than those from the Lea Symbols acuity test (P <.001). CONCLUSIONS: The proportion of children between 3 and 3.5 years of age whose monocular visual acuity could be assessed was high and was similar for the two charts tested. Crowded HOTV acuity results were better on average than results using Lea symbols. The different formats of the two tests may explain the observed differences in threshold acuity level.     

Contrast visual acuities in cataract patients. I. Comparison with normal subjects.

Contrast sensitivity and glare sensitivity are often abnormal in cataract patients. However, despite significant subjective complaints, relatively good visual acuities often are obtained with high-contrast optotypes. Using Variable-Contrast Visual Acuity Charts (VCVAC), we measured visual acuities of 40 eyes of 24 normal subjects (visual acuity greater than or equal to 1.0) aged 41 to 72 years, and 40 eyes of 28 cataract patients (visual acuity greater than or equal to 0.6) aged 44 to 81 years. The VCVAC consists of 4 different charts (1-4). The contrast is 90% in charts 1 and 4, 15% in chart 2 and 2.5% in chart 3. Chart 4 is the reverse polarity of chart 1. The decrease of visual acuity compared with the high-contrast chart (chart 1) was larger in the cataract group with both in the 15% contrast (0.52 vs. 0.71 octave) and the 2.5% contrast (1.21 vs. 1.75 octaves). In cataract group, 23/40 eyes (57.5%) showed better visual acuity with chart 4 than that of chart 1. In addition to high-contrast optotypes, acuity measurements using intermediate- to low-contrast optotypes, combined with the reverse polarity chart, seem effective in analyzing the visual disabilities caused by early cataract.     

Task Complexity and Visual Acuity in Senile Macular Degeneration

ABSTRACT The effects of choice of test object and inter-symbol spacing (contour interaction) on the measurement of low visual acuities was investigated. Visual acuities of sixteen subjects with senile macular degeneration and five age-matched normal subjects were measured using different test targets of varying complexities. Visual acuity of both groups of subjects decreased with increasing task complexity but the trend was more marked for the low vision subjects. However, within the low vision group, the complexity effect was not dependent on the level of visual acuity. This study showed that visual acuity of persons with senile macular degeneration can be measured equally well with single letters, constant contour interaction Landolt rings, or the Bailey-Lovie letter chart but the test used should be specified. Grating targets and word charts measure different visual functions from standard visual acuity tests.     

Modified Allen pictures to assess amblyopia in young children

To produce a test of visual acuity for young children that is more sensitive to amblyopia than current preschool vision tests, the authors surrounded four Allen pictures with "crowding" bars. This modified Allen test was evaluated by measuring acuity of amblyopic children (n = 28) and children (n = 10) and adults (n = 5) with normal eyes. Mean acuities of amblyopic eyes for the modified pictures was 0.8 octaves or nearly three logMar Snellen lines poorer than for the isolated pictures. For nonamblyopic and normal eyes modified picture acuity averaged 0.1 to 0.4 octaves poorer than isolated picture acuity. Average acuities of amblyopic eyes (n = 22) for the modified pictures agreed with line letter acuities. These results suggest that the modified picture test induces contour interaction similar to that of line letter tests, and thus, is a more sensitive test of amblyopia in the preschool child than isolated symbols.     

Comparison of visual acuity levels in pediatric patients with amblyopia using Wright figures, Allen optotypes, and Snellen letters.

PURPOSE: To compare and correlate the clinical performance of Wright figures in visual acuity assessments of pediatric patients with amblyopia to those obtained through Allen cards and Snellen letters. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Best-corrected visual acuity of 26 amblyopic children were measured with the Wright figures(c), Snellen letters, and isolated Allen optotypes, respectively. Amblyopia was defined as two lines of visual acuity difference or a visual acuity level of 20/30 or lower as determined by Snellen chart. The results were evaluated for statistical intergroup differences using the Wilks' Lambda multivariate analysis of variance and for correlation using the Pearson correlation coefficient test. RESULTS: The mean age of the subjects was 8.27 +/- 2.46 years (range: 5 to 15 years). The mean logMAR values for the Wright figures(c), Snellen letters, and Allen optotypes were 0.40 +/- 0.20, 0.47 +/- 0.23, and 0.29 +/- 0.28, respectively. When compared with Snellen letters, the Wright figures correlated to a higher degree ( r = 0.46, P < 0.001) than Allen optotypes ( r = 0.67, P < 0.001). With a visual acuity of 20/40 or worse on Snellen letter testing, the sensitivity of Wright figures(c) and Allen cards in diagnosing amblyopic eyes was 87.0 and 56.5%, respectively ( P = 0.016). CONCLUSIONS: Wright figures, designed primarily to evaluate the vision in the preliterate pediatric population, correlate more closely to Snellen letters and have a higher rate of correctly identifying amblyopia than isolated Allen optotypes in pediatric patients.     

Computer-based test to measure optimal visual acuity in age-related macular degeneration

PURPOSE: The authors present a computer-based method for evaluating the visual acuity of patients with age-related macular degeneration (AMD). It incorporates four features known to improve visual acuity: high contrast, white optotypes on a black background to reduce intraocular scatter, proportional layout to reduce the effects of crowding, and multiple optotypes to minimize the effects of fixation instability and to maximize the likelihood of optotype detection. METHODS: Experiment 1 evaluated the best-eye acuity of 24 patients with AMD using the ETDRS chart and three versions of the Tumbling E acuity test: multiple black optotypes on a white background, single white optotype on a black background, and multiple white optotypes on a black background. Experiment 2 compared the two White E optotype tests with the ETDRS in patients with AMD, and Experiment 3 measured probability summation in persons with normal vision. RESULTS: Multiple white optotypes on a black background yielded the highest acuity estimates and the ETDRS the lowest. The Single E test yielded a lower estimate of acuity than the two Multiple E tests. The effect of polarity-white on black was better than black on white-was consistent with results found in persons with healthy retinas. For patients with AMD, acuity measured with the Multiple E test was independent of that measured with the ETDRS, but acuity measured with the Single E test decreased as acuity worsened. For the participants with normal vision, the differences between the Multiple and Single E tests were within the known limits of test-retest variability. CONCLUSIONS: The multiple-optotype, reversed-polarity test provides a measure of the optimal visual acuity of which a person is capable and, in this sense, may be a useful tool for assessing rehabilitation progress.     

Measurement of visual acuity with two different charts; a comparison of results and repeatability in patients with cataract

Purpose: To compare two different optotypes to measure visual acuity. Methods: Experiment 1: Fifty patients with moderate cataracts were asked to read a chart consisting of letters of the alphabet (Sloan letters) first and a chart comprising Landolt's broken rings afterwards. Experiment 2: Half of patients were instructed to repeat the reading with a second letter chart, the other half was instructed to read the chart with the broken rings again. Results and conclusions: Experiment 1: It was found that with the letter chart more optotypes (two to four) were recognized than with the broken ring chart. The different result of visual acuity measurement with the two optotypes is irrespective of the visual acuity. Experiment 2: The re-read instruction revealed that the measurements were reproduced equally for both charts.     

Differences in visual acuity between the eyes: determination of normal limits in a clinical population

We determined the difference in visual acuity between the right and left eyes of patients and also determined the maximal level of acuity expected in a group of visually normal individuals. Visual acuity was measured in the right and left eyes of 72 subjects aged from 16 to 67 years using Bailey-Lovie type charts. The chart was read until fewer than three letters were read on a line and acuities were based on each letter correct contributing ?0.02 to the overall score. For 12 of these subjects, visual acuity was measured a further four times. Average visual acuities for right and left eyes were ?0.137 and ?0.126logMAR, respectively. The signed visual acuity difference was normally distributed and had a standard deviation of 0.050logMAR. The mean visual acuity difference for the 12 subjects for whom the measures were repeated was 0.033logMAR (SD of the signed visual acuity difference: 0.049logMAR). We conclude that if a patient has a difference in visual acuity between the two eyes of more than 5 letters on a Bailey-Lovie style chart, further investigation is indicated.     

Glasgow Acuity Cards: a new test for the measurement of letter acuity in children

Problems with design and format of the traditional Snellen chart have led to the development of alternative charts for the measurement of visual acuity in adults. However, advances in chart design for the measurement of visual acuity in pre-school children have not paralleled those used in adult test charts. Visual acuity can be measured in infants and very young children using behavioural and electro-physiological techniques but clinical measurement of letter acuity tends to commence when the child is old enough to interact and co-operate with the examiner. Charts which arc commercially available in the UK for measuring letter acuity in pre-school children (3–5 years old) either use single optotypes or are derivatives of the Snellen format. There is a need for a test of letter acuity for use with this young age group which is accurate, reliable and based upon sound and established design principles. Glasgow Acuity-Cards have been designed to include features that should allow change in letter acuity to be detected in pre-school children, especially those undergoing vision therapy training. The test is performed at 3 m and incorporates several design features which have been used previously in adult charts but are new to childrens' test charts. These include: linear progression of letter sizes using a log scale; letters of approximately equal legibility; equal number of letters per line; control of contour interaction; screening cards to determine initial level of acuity. The test is quick and easy to perform and should provide a means of detecting change in letter acuity, with increased confidence.     

The effect of neodymium: YAG capsulotomy on contrast sensitivity and the evaluation of methods for its assessment

OBJECTIVE: To determine the most appropriate method for measuring the effect on contrast sensitivity of neodymium:YAG (Nd:YAG) posterior capsulotomy for early posterior capsular opacification (PCO). DESIGN: Prospective comparison of five different methods for luminous contrast sensitivity testing in patients undergoing capsulotomy. PARTICIPANTS: Sixteen patients with PCO involving the visual axis and visual acuities of 20/40 or better were recruited sequentially. INTERVENTION: All patients were tested with each of the five tests before and after Nd:YAG capsulotomy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The contrast sensitivity function was measured with variable contrast sine wave gratings using the Vistech VCTS 6500, Mentor B-VAT-II and a computer graphics system. Peak contrast sensitivity at 3 cyc/deg was compared with two letter tests, the Pelli-Robson chart, and a computer that generated optotypes. RESULTS: Significant generalized improvement that was not frequency selective was measured over the entire contrast sensitivity function after capsulotomy. The five tests did not significantly differ (P > 0.05) in their measurement of peak contrast sensitivity (3 cyc/deg) improvement after capsulotomy. Letter-based tests showed better agreement and lower variance than gratings tests. Visual acuity and contrast sensitivity improvement were poorly correlated. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that contrast sensitivity is adequately documented by a single measurement at 3 cyc/deg, is an informative supplement to visual acuity, and that little extra information is to be gained by measuring further spatial frequencies in eyes with PCO. Peak contrast sensitivity is best determined using a letter-based test.     

The electronic visual acuity tester: testability in preschool children.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the ability of preschool children to have their threshold visual acuity assessed using a standardized, computer-based letter test. METHODS: Participants were 1195 3.5- to 5-year-old children enrolled in the Vision in Preschoolers Study. Monocular visual acuity was assessed by licensed eye care professionals (optometrists and pediatric ophthalmologists experimented in the examination of children), using the Electronic Visual Acuity tester, which uses the letters H, O, T, and V with a crowded surround. RESULTS: Overall, 99.1% of children passed the training that consisted of identifying the letters H, O, T, and V by naming or matching the letters at 60 cm. Among those who passed the training, 99.6% completed the binocular pretest at 3 m, and 97.6% of those passing the training and the pretest completed monocular threshold visual acuity testing of each eye with the Electronic Visual Acuity tester. Testability increased with age for training (p = 0.03), pretesting (p = 0.04), and acuity testing (p = 0.07). Overall, 93.3% of 3.5-year-olds, 96.7% of 4-year-olds, and 98.8% of 5-year-olds completed training, pretesting, and monocular threshold acuity testing of each eye using standard letter optotypes. CONCLUSION: Using the computer-based Electronic Visual Acuity system, nearly all 3.5- to 5-year-old children can complete monocular acuity testing of each eye.     

Glare testing in cataract patients: instrument evaluation and identification of sources of methodological error

This study sought to determine the relative sensitivity of two commercially available glare testers in predicting outdoor acuity in a population of patients with minimal cataracts. Two target optotypes were evaluated: high contrast letters and varying contrast sinusoidal gratings. Although both instruments demonstrated a significant correlation between indoor and outdoor acuity, they showed a significant difference between predicted outdoor acuity and obtained visual acuity. The brightness acuity tester on high intensity was inaccurate in predicting outdoor vision regardless of test optotype, overpredicting glare disability in 76% (average) of the study population. Glare disability overpredictions fell to 8% on the medium setting with +/- 2 lines of vision classified as "no change." Using the same criterion, the Miller-Nadler glare tester overpredicted glare disability in 2% of the cataract population but underpredicted glare disability in 62%. In this study, letter optotypes resulted in less variability than sinusoidal grating stimuli. In addition, we identify several methodological factors to consider before designing a glare experiment. These potential sources of error can influence the outcome of any glare study that compares indoor and outdoor acuity and include the study population, visual stimuli (optotypes), and elements of the outdoor testing situation.     

Real-time rapid acuity assessment using VEPs: development and validation of the step VEP technique

PURPOSE: To develop a reference range of visual acuities corresponding to thresholds found using the step VEP method of rapid, objective visual acuity assessment by using steady state (ss)VEPs in normal adults. METHODS: Sixteen normal adults had visual acuity assessed five times with both the step VEP and with Glasgow Acuity Cards (GAC). Subjects were tested once without filters and with four different levels of optical filtering provided by Bangerter neutral-density filters. Acuity outcomes were compared by linear regression and Bland-Altman analysis. RESULTS: Step VEP and GAC acuities correlated highly (r(2) = 0.60, P = 0.000). GAC scores were predicted with the equation: acuity(GAC) = (0.9 x acuity(step VEP)) - 0.37. Step VEP acuity was 0.46 (95% CI: -0.13 to 1.06) logMAR units greater (poorer) than GAC acuities in these normal subjects. The disparity between test results did not vary with visual acuity. CONCLUSIONS: The step VEP provides a rapid, objective means of estimating visual acuity that can be related to acuity derived from a commonly used letter test.     

Landolt C and snellen e acuity: differences in strabismus amblyopia?

BACKGROUND: Assessment of visual acuity depends on the optotypes used for measurement. The ability to recognize different optotypes differs even if their critical details appear under the same visual angle. Since optotypes are evaluated on individuals with good visual acuity and without eye disorders, differences in the lower visual acuity range cannot be excluded. In this study, visual acuity measured with the Snellen E was compared to the Landolt C acuity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 100 patients (age 8 - 90 years, median 60.5 years) with various eye disorders, among them 39 with amblyopia due to strabismus, and 13 healthy volunteers were tested. Charts with the Snellen E and the Landolt C (Precision Vision) which mimic the ETDRS charts were used to assess visual acuity. Three out of 5 optotypes per line had to be correctly identified, while wrong answers were monitored. In the group of patients, the eyes with the lower visual acuity, and the right eyes of the healthy subjects, were evaluated. RESULTS: Differences between Landolt C acuity (LR) and Snellen E acuity (SE) were small. The mean decimal values for LR and SE were 0.25 and 0.29 in the entire group and 0.14 and 0.16 for the eyes with strabismus amblyopia. The mean difference between LR and SE was 0.55 lines in the entire group and 0.55 lines for the eyes with strabismus amblyopia, with higher values of SE in both groups. The results of the other groups were similar with only small differences between LR and SE. CONCLUSION: Using the charts described, there was only a slight overestimation of visual acuity by the Snellen E compared to the Landolt C, even in strabismus amblyopia. Small differences in the lower visual acuity range have to be considered.     

Digital visual acuity test using calculator-type numerals with geometric gradation

The authors have developed a visual acuity test using numeric optotypes with dimensions similar to numerals used in liquid crystal displays (LCDs) or light-emitting diodes (LEDs). Each optotype has the same external configuration to minimize variation in recognition difficulty. The test is designed with geometric gradation and an equal number of optotypes per line, which facilitates the recording of acuity in decimal notation. This allows convenient data entry and computer analysis of acuity results. Chart inversion provides greater flexibility by altering the numeric sequence. This new digital acuity test (DAT) compares favorably to acuity tests that have Sloan or Snellen letters as optotypes.     

Using the KM visual acuity chart for more reliable evaluation of amblyopia compared to the HVOT method

PURPOSE: To evaluate a new letter matching visual acuity (VA) chart (the KM chart) for children aged 5-7 years, designed as a Monoyer-based chart, in order to obtain a better consistency between school and preschool VA recordings. METHODS: Visual acuities were assessed using three methods: the HVOT, KM and Monoyer charts. Comparisons were made between the KM method versus the HVOT and Monoyer methods, respectively. Children with normal vision and with different degrees of amblyopia were investigated. RESULTS: Visual acuity levels appeared significantly higher in children with amblyopia when tested with the HVOT chart than when tested with the KM chart. Visual acuities obtained with the Monoyer and KM methods were comparable. The difference between the Monoyer and KM methods on the one hand, and the HVOT method on the other, can be explained by the fact that the HVOT chart elicits less crowding effect than the other two charts. CONCLUSIONS: Visual acuity in children with amblyopia might be overestimated if the HVOT test alone is used to assess vision. Use of the HVOT chart, therefore, should be restricted to the 3.5-4.5 years age group, for whom the KM chart is somewhat too difficult. In our opinion the KM chart should be preferred for use with older preschool children because it shows good consistency with the Monoyer chart.     

Distance and near visual acuity in infantile nystagmus.

PURPOSE: Infantile nystagmus (IN) has been reported to decrease with convergence. However, previous studies reported equivocal results regarding a corresponding improvement in acuity with near viewing. The aim of this study was to determine whether visual acuity improves with near viewing in patients with IN. METHODS: In the first experiment, visual acuities were measured using clinical test charts at standard test distances of 3 or 6 m and 40 cm and using S Charts at 3.75 m and 40 cm. In the second experiment, visual acuities were measured using a Bailey-Lovie chart at distance and a Lighthouse modified ETDRS near card held by each subject at his or her preferred working distance. S-chart acuities were obtained again at 3.75 m and 40 cm for comparison. Horizontal eye movements were recorded using infrared limbal reflection for 20 of the 34 subjects in the first experiment and for all 20 subjects in the second experiment. RESULTS: The S-chart acuities measured at distance and near were almost all within 0.1 logMAR (logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution) in experiments 1 and 2. Clinically measured acuity averaged nearly one line better at 40 cm than at distance in experiment 1, but the mean difference between near acuity using the ETDRS card and distance acuity using the Bailey-Lovie chart was less than one letter in experiment 2. No consistent relationship existed between the changes in visual acuity with viewing distance and the subject's eye movements. CONCLUSION: Despite a reduction of nystagmus at near distances in many patients with IN, the visual acuity at near does not improve significantly. These results imply that visual acuity in patients with IN is determined primarily by sensory limitations rather than by the moment-by-moment characteristics of these patients' eye movements.     

Visual acuity and fixation characteristics in age-related macular degeneration.

PURPOSE: To compare "single letter" (SL) acuity, "crowded letter" (CL) acuity, and "repeated letter" (RL) acuity for patients with age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and investigate if differences between these visual acuities are associated with fixation characteristics. METHODS: A total of 243 patients with AMD had their best-corrected visual acuity measured on an ETDRS chart. SL, CL, and RL acuities were measured using Landolt C targets on a monitor. Fifty-degree-field red-free fundus photographs were taken and a static target was used to calculate the Preferred Retinal Locus (PRL) distance and direction from the fovea. Quality of fixation (consistency and oculomotor response) was also assessed using a fundus camera and a dynamic target. RESULTS: RL acuity was almost always better than CL acuity and SL acuity was almost always better than CL acuity. The mean (+/-SD) RL-CL and SL-CL acuity differences were -0.13 (+/-0.15) logMAR and -0.11 (+/-0.13) logMAR respectively. The median PRL distance was 3.73 degrees and the preferred retinal areas for the location of the PRL were the left (left quadrant of visual field; 39.5% of cases) and superior (inferior quadrant of visual field; 25.4%). Visual acuity was significantly associated with PRL distance but PRL distance only explained 10% of the variation in visual acuity. PRL distance was found to be a significant but weak predictor of the SL-CL acuity difference but fixation quality was not a good predictor of the RL-CL acuity difference. CONCLUSIONS: Although the acuity measured under different stimulus conditions varies, the absolute differences are small. This suggests that these techniques would not be helpful in determining fixation characteristics, or predicting the outcome of rehabilitation in individual patients with AMD.     

Discrimination of paediatric acuity test optotypes by 6-year-old children

Purpose

To compare the discrimination performance of 6-year-old children for optotypes from six paediatric visual acuity tests and to fit Luce's Biased Choice Model to the data to estimate the relative similarities and bias for each optotype.

Methods

Full data sets were collected from 20 typically developing 6-year-olds who had passed a vision screening. They were presented with single optotypes labelled 6/12 at a distance of 9 m and were asked to identify the optotype using a matching task containing all optotypes from the relevant test. The data were combined to form a confusion matrix for each test and a biased choice model was fitted to the data.

Results

Median correct performance varied from 40% to 100% across optotypes, with the HOTV test having the highest values. Estimates of the similarity of each pair of optotypes indicated equal values for all pairs in the Landolt C, HOTV, Lea numbers and Tumbling E tests. The values differed for the picture tests, that is Lea Symbols and Allen figures. The estimates of bias for each individual optotype also indicated different values with the picture tests.

Conclusions

Previous studies of the threshold acuity of young children and adults have indicated differences in acuity estimates across paediatric tests. A recognition acuity task typically requires resolving the difference information between optotypes. The performance of the 6-year-olds here reveals variance in similarity and bias values for picture tests, particularly for the Allen figures when compared with the Lea Symbols. Ideally, this analysis should be performed when designing new tests, and these results motivate progression from the use of current picture tests to well calibrated letter or number tests at the earliest possible age.