The theory of the sick breast lobe and the possible consequences

We hypothesize that carcinoma in situ, and consequently breast carcinoma in general, is a lobar disease because the simultaneously or asynchronously appearing, often multiple tumor foci develop within a single lobe. The sick lobe carries some kind of genetic instability already from its initialization during the early embryonic life and is more sensitive to noxious influences than the other lobes within the same breast. Decades of postnatal life with accumulation of additional genetic alterations are needed for malignant transformation of the cells within the sick lobe. The transformation is often multifocal (involving separate distant lobules of this lobe) or diffuse (involving the larger ducts). This hypothesis offers new perspectives in cancer prevention, because selective visualization, excision, or destruction of the sick lobe before development of malignant lesions would substantially reduce the incidence of breast carcinoma.     

Monoclonality in normal epithelium and in hyperplastic and neoplastic lesions of the breast

The clonal nature of neoplastic lesions such as invasive breast cancer and ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) has been widely proven by several proliferative, genetic or other malignancy-associated markers. The aim of this study is to clarify whether benign hyperplastic lesions such as ductal hyperplasia of usual type (DH) and papilloma can be distinguished from neoplastic lesions such as DCIS by X-chromosome inactivation analysis. Clonal analysis was performed using a polymerase chain reaction-based assay for non-random X-chromosome inactivation of the human androgen receptor gene (HUMARA). Formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded archival tissue of ten DCIS, sixteen DH, nine papillomas, and seven normal terminal ductal lobular units (TDLUs) was laser-microdissected to avoid contamination with surrounding tissue. All of the cases analysed revealed a monoclonal origin. Furthermore, in one of these cases, opposite X chromosomes were inactivated within the same breast. X-linked inactivation analysis clearly demonstrates that, at least in the breast, monoclonality is not restricted to neoplastic processes. The data support the hypothesis that the mammary gland is organized into distinct stem cell-derived monoclonal patches and that TDLUs are monoclonal in origin. Any proliferative lesion arising within such a pre-existing clonal patch should therefore be clonal, irrespective of whether it originates from one or more patch cells. Thus, X-chromosome inactivation analysis cannot be considered a valid method for distinguishing between neoplastic and hyperplastic breast lesions.     

Discrepancies in the diagnosis of intraductal proliferative lesions of the breast and its management implications: results of a multinational survey

To measure discrepancies in diagnoses and recommendations impacting management of proliferative lesions of the breast, a questionnaire of five problem scenarios was distributed among over 300 practicing pathologists. Of the 230 respondents, 56.5% considered a partial cribriform proliferation within a duct adjacent to unequivocal ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) as atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH), 37.7% of whom recommended reexcision if it were at a resection margin. Of the 43.5% who diagnosed the partially involved duct as DCIS, 28.0% would not recommend reexcision if the lesion were at a margin. When only five ducts had a partial cribriform proliferation, 35.7% considered it as DCIS, while if ≥20 ducts were so involved, this figure rose to 60.4%. When one duct with a complete cribriform pattern measured 0.5, 1.5, or 4 mm, a diagnosis of DCIS was made by 22.6, 31.3, and 94.8%, respectively. When multiple ducts with flat epithelial atypia were at a margin, 20.9% recommended reexcision. Much of these discrepancies arise from the artificial separation of ADH and low-grade DCIS and emphasize the need for combining these two under the umbrella designation of ductal intraepithelial neoplasia grade 1 (DIN 1) to diminish the impact of different terminologies applied to biologically similar lesions.     

Immunostaining patterns of myoepithelial cells in breast lesions: a comparison of CD10 and smooth muscle myosin heavy chain

BACKGROUND: Recent studies have reported CD10 expression in myoepithelial cells (MEC) of the breast, supporting its use as a marker to help distinguish invasive breast carcinoma (IC) from ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Aim: To compare the effectiveness of CD10 with smooth muscle myosin heavy chain (SMMHC) in the detection of MEC in benign and malignant breast lesions. METHODS: Histological material from 25 patients with DCIS and 21 with IC were immunostained for CD10 and SMMHC. Staining was scored on a scale of 0 to 3+ (0, no staining; 3+, intense) and the staining distribution was documented as focal, partial, or circumferential. RESULTS: Uniform, 3+ circumferential CD10 and SMMHC staining of MEC was seen in normal breast ducts and lobules, and in ducts and acini involved in sclerosing adenosis and apocrine metaplasia. In an analysis of total ducts involved by DCIS, 3+ circumferential staining was seen in 65 of 366 ducts (17.7%) stained for CD10 versus 190 of 396 ducts (48%) stained for SMMHC. MEC were not detected immunohistochemically in 116 of 366 ducts (31.7%) with anti-CD10 and 50 of 396 (12.7%) with anti-SMMHC. In contrast, all ICs were negative for both CD10 and SMMHC. Focal background staining of stromal myofibroblasts was seen with both CD10 and SMMHC, but CD10 showed a higher rate of non-specific staining of epithelial cells. CONCLUSION: Although CD10 can aid in the distinction between IC and DCIS, SMMHC is a more sensitive and specific marker of MEC and shows less heterogeneity of immunostaining patterns.     

Basaloid ductal carcinoma in situ arising in salivary gland metaplasia of the breast: a case report

Salivary gland metaplasia is a newly recognized, adenosis-like lesion which could not be classified according to known categories of adenosis of the breast. We report a case of basaloid ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) arising in a background of salivary gland metaplasia in a 49-year old woman who visited our hospital for a right breast mass. Breast ultrasonography showed a multi-lobulating mixed hypoechoic and isoechoic mass measuring 2.9 cm in size at the periareolar area. Histologically, the lesion showed a well-defined DCIS with basaloid tumor cells and central comedo-type necrosis surrounded by salivary gland metaplasia composed of glands or ducts not specific to the breast, ducts with cribriform proliferation of luminal epithelial cells, and ducts with varying degrees of proliferation of basaloid cells including solid nests of basaloid cells. Salivary gland metaplasia is a most unusual lesion of the breast characterized by salivary gland-type acini and ducts with various proliferations of luminal and basaloid cells, and accompanied by malignant tumor of basal cell type.     

The impact of large sections on the study of in situ and invasive duct carcinoma of the breast

Large histologic sections (LHSs) are increasingly used in the study of normal and neoplastic breast tissue. LHSs allow the direct visualization of a large part of the breast glandular tree. Accordingly, LHSs have shown that in situ and invasive lobular carcinoma is a multilobar (and hence multifocal) neoplastic lesion in more than 50% of the cases, and that poorly differentiated duct carcinoma in situ (DCIS grade 3) is frequently unifocal, whereas it is often multifocal when the in situ lesion is a well-differentiated type (DCIS grade 1). Forty-five mastectomies were studied with large sections. Mastectomies were performed when quadrantectomy did not guarantee radical excision of the tumor with adequate cosmesis because of the large size of the lesion or because the neoplastic lesion was located below the nipple. Excluded were cases of lobular neoplasia or invasive lobular carcinoma, because they were reported separately, and cases of mastectomies performed for sarcoma or recurrent phyllodes tumor. All cases had undergone a preoperative diagnostic procedure (fine needle aspiration), and the relative positive material was reviewed. All 45 cases showed in situ duct carcinoma and 37 showed evidence of invasive duct carcinoma. Forty-two cases of DCIS were multifocal, whereas only 4 invasive duct carcinoma were shown as multifocal. When DCIS lesions were subdivided into 3 grades, no statistical significance was seen among the 3 groups of DCIS in regard to multifocality. Nevertheless, DCIS grade 1 was a widespread condition involving more than one lobe and quadrant, whereas DCIS grades 2 and 3 appeared more localized. DCIS grade 1 was more similar to that previously observed in lobular in situ neoplasia/lobular in situ carcinoma. In 66.6% of the cases, DCIS foci were found within the invasive areas, indicating a more than fortuitous occurrence (2-sided P=.0357).     

Perineural and intraneural involvement in ductal carcinoma in-situ of breast: Case report

Invasion of peripheral nerves by epithelial cells has been traditionally regarded as a feature diagnostic of malignancy, its presence therefore being often sought to document a diagnosis of carcinoma, particularly in the breast. Perineural involvement (PNI) by benign breast disease is not often seen and the etiology is uncertain. The first reported case of nerve invasion in a benign breast lesion was by Ackerman in 1957. Subsequent reports have further confirmed this finding in the breast. The most challenging observation is when the glands involving nerves show cytologic and architectural features of the adjacent atypical duct hyperplasia (ADH) or ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Here, we describe a case of ductal carcinoma in situ grade 2 with nerve involvement in a lumpectomy specimen in a 59-year-old woman. To the best of our knowledge, only five cases of atypical duct hyperplasia by Gobbi et al. and four cases of ductal carcinoma in situ, 3 by Gobi et al. and 1 by Tsang and Chan, associated with nerve involvement, have been reported in English medical literature. Two layers of epithelial cells with the immunohistochemical demonstration of the preservation of a continuous myoepithelial layer in the mammary ducts within the nearby small nerves, is the main clue to confirm the in-situ nature of the inclusions. It is necessary to be aware of this phenomenon in breast lesions to avoid over-diagnosis and inappropriate surgery.     

Myoepithelial cells and basal lamina in poorly differentiated in situ duct carcinoma of the breast

 A retrospective study was made of 38 selected brest tumours with a poorly differentiated in situ duct component. These were classified on haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) as ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS; 10 cases), DCIS with invasion (17 cases) and DCIS with features suggestive of for stromal invasion (11 cases). The last were these lesions composed of neoplastic ducts with irregular outlines and a myoepithelial layer that was not clearly evident or large neoplastic ducts growing close together or surrounded by inflammatory desmoplastic stroma. Cases of DCIS involving areas of sclerosing adenosis were included in this category. Consecutive sections obtained from each case were studied with a panel of antibodies against myoepithelial cells (alpha smooth muscle actin and calponin) and basal lamina (BL) components (laminin and type IV collagen). It was found that in situ lesions showed well-formed basal lamina and/or an evident myoepithelial layer. These features were lacking in the invasive areas. Nine of the 11 cases with suggestive features of stromal invasion were reclassified as invasive duct carcinoma (5 cases)and DCIS (4 cases), according to the absence or presence of a continuous myoepithelial layer and/or basal lamina. In 2 such cases immunohistochemistry yielded equivocal results and the label ”suggestive of invasion” was therefore pertinent. Immunohistochemistry facilitates the diagnosis of breast DCIS; myoepithelial and basal lamina markers are useful in differentiating microinvasive from in situ ductal carcinomas of the breast. Received: 29 July 1998 / Accepted: 11 November 1998     

Predictors of disease progression in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast and vascular patterns

Breast carcinoma-induced angiogenesis helps meet growing metabolic needs of tumors and progressively increases with malignant transformation of benign ducts to ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and ductal carcinoma in situ to invasive carcinoma. There are conflicting data regarding the difference in angiogenesis in low-, intermediate-, and high-grade ductal carcinoma in situ. If angiogenesis is related to ductal carcinoma in situ progression, the types of ductal carcinoma in situ with more aggressive biologic potential would have different vascular patterns than the less aggressive ones. In this study, we classified 51 cases of ductal carcinoma in situ as low (10-20 years to progression to invasive carcinoma), moderate, or high aggressive (2-5 years to progression to invasive carcinoma), based on criteria outlined by Tsikitis and Chung (Am J Clin Oncol 2006; 29:305), which takes into account nuclear grade, mitotic rate, Ki-67, Her2Neu, P53, estrogen, and progesterone receptor expression. We correlated these 3 groups of ductal carcinoma in situ with the extent of periductal and stromal vascularity and the presence and type of vascular breaks. No association of aggressive biologic behavior of ductal carcinoma in situ with any vascular pattern was found. Moreover, no correlation was found between vascular patterns and classifiers of aggressiveness, microvascular density, or outcome (local recurrence, invasive carcinoma, or metastatic disease). To validate our cohort, we confirmed expected correlations of all measured parameters of aggressiveness by correlating them with each other. In summary, vascular patterns in ductal carcinoma in situ do not correlate with the predictors of aggressive behavior, suggesting that the biologic potential of ductal carcinoma in situ is independent of angiogenesis.     

Amplification of Her-2/neu gene in Her-2/neu-overexpressing and -nonexpressing breast carcinomas and their synchronous benign, premalignant, and metastatic lesions detected by FISH in archival material.

Amplification of Her-2/neu in breast carcinoma is associated with poor prognosis, short disease-free interval, and short survival time in both node-negative and -positive patients. Little is known about the starting point of amplification of Her-2/neu and how it progresses from benign to malignant breast lesions. We attempted to address these questions by evaluating amplification of Her-2/neu in benign, premalignant, and malignant lesions using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Twenty-six patients with Her-2/neu-overexpressing invasive ductal carcinomas (as judged by strong immunoreactivity with Her-2/neu antibody) and coexisting lesions of ductal hyperplasia (DH), atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH), ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) in the vicinity of the invasive tumor (as judged by review of the hematoxylin and eosin-stained sections), as well as metastatic carcinoma in axillary lymph nodes (mets) were selected for this study. In the primary carcinomas, a close relationship was present between overexpression as detected by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and amplification as demonstrated by FISH (85% concordance). Among these patients, amplification of Her-2/neu in ADH was demonstrated in 7 of 13 cases with ADH, and in DCIS, in 21 of 22 cases with DCIS. There was no amplification in DH or normal ductal epithelium. Significantly, in all 12 patients with synchronous positive axillary lymph nodes, there was concordant amplification of Her-2/neu in the primary and metastatic carcinoma. Amplification was consistent in multifocal metastases, despite morphological heterogeneity in some patients. Amplification ratios increased from ADH to DCIS to invasive carcinoma (P <.01, ADH versus DCIS; P <.05, DCIS versus invasive cancer), but there was no difference in amplification ratios between primary cancers and synchronous axillary metastases (P >.05). We also evaluated Her-2/neu amplification in 21 patients without Her-2/neu overexpression in their primary carcinomas (as judged by absent immunoreactivity with Her-2/neu antibody). Three showed amplification in both primary and metastatic lesions, with a low amplification ratio (approximately 2). One patient had amplification in the primary tumor but not in an axillary metastasis. Two patients exhibited slight amplification in the metastatic carcinoma (ratios 1.6 and 2), but not in their primary cancers. This FISH study indicates that amplification of Her-2/neu can emerge de novo in any stage of the disease process, from ADH to metastatic lesions, but most often appears first in ADH or DCIS. The degree of Her-2/neu amplification increases with progression to invasive carcinoma, there being no further increase in synchronous metastasis. Our data suggest that amplification of Her-2/neu appears to be mainly involved in initiation of breast oncogenesis and that its role in progression of breast cancers is uncertain.     

Focal adhesion kinase as a marker of malignant phenotype in breast and cervical carcinomas

Integrins mediate cell adhesion to extracellular matrix and stimulate signals involved in cell proliferation, survival, and migration. Focal adhesion kinase (FAK) is considered the central molecule in integrin-mediated signaling. Previously, FAK has been implicated in invasive tumor behavior based on Northern or Western blot (immunoblot) using total tumor tissue homogenates. We used immunohistochemistry to demonstrate FAK expression in benign cervical epithelium, dysplasia, carcinoma in situ (CIS), and invasive cervical squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs), as well as in benign breast tissue, atypical ductal hyperplasia, and ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and invasive carcinomas of the breast. We also used polymerase chain reaction to analyze whether infection with the high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) subtypes correlated with FAK overexpression in CIS of the cervix. We found minimal FAK expression in benign cervical and breast epithelium and in low-grade squamous dysplasia (CIN I and CIN I-II) of the cervix, and variable FAK expression in CIS lesions of the cervix (10 of 14 cases). Most of the invasive SCCs of the cervix (13 of 16 cases) and DCIS of the breast (6 of 8 cases) were positive for FAK. Surprisingly, all DCIS of the breast were also strongly positive (7 of 7). Only 3 of 13 cases of atypical ductal hyperplasia were focally positive for FAK. Regardless of the intensity of FAK staining, all CIS of the cervix were positive for either HPV 16 or 18. We conclude that FAK overexpression is not restricted to invasive phenotype, but rather appears to be a marker for malignant transformation.     

Expression of CD44s, CD44v6, and hyaluronan across the spectrum of normal-hyperplasia-carcinoma in breast.

BACKGROUND: The interaction between transmembrane receptors on epithelial tumor cells and the surrounding extracellular matrix molecules is important in tumor progression and metastasis. This interaction is best exemplified by the relationship of the receptor CD44 and the extracellular matrix component hyaluronan (HA). This study seeks to evaluate the expression and the correlation of CD44s, CD44v6, and HA in normal, hyperplastic, and malignant breast epithelium and stroma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Archival paraffin-embedded tissue from cases of normal breast tissue (n=10), intraductal hyperplasia without atypia (n=13), ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) (n=24), stage I infiltrating ductal carcinoma (n=28), stage II infiltrating ductal carcinoma (n=31), and their corresponding positive lymph nodes were retrieved from the surgical pathology files. Tissue sections were evaluated for the expression of CD44s, CD44v6, and HA in the epithelial and stromal cells by immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: Ductal epithelial cells and myoepithelial cells expressed CD44s in all cases of normal and benign breast tissue. The expression of CD44s in breast epithelium progressively decreased with increasing deviation from normal histology: 83% in DCIS, 46% in stage I ductal carcinoma and 26% in stage II ductal carcinoma. The reverse trend was observed for CD44v6 in ductal epithelium: 0% in normal breast, 15% in intraductal hyperplasia, 100% in DCIS, 82% in stage I infiltrating ductal carcinoma, 94% in stage II carcinoma, and 100% of metastatic carcinoma in the lymph nodes. HA was noted exclusively in the stroma but not in the epithelial cells. HA was faintly expressed in the intralobular stroma of normal breast tissue, confined to a narrow faint band adjacent to intraductal hyperplasia and localized to a broad well-defined band around DCIS. Stromal HA staining was more diffuse and intense in infiltrating carcinomas and was particularly pronounced surrounding the metastatic deposits in lymph nodes. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates decreased expression of CD44s accompanied by increased expression of CD44v6 and increased stromal HA in breast cancer. These findings suggest that CD44s, CD44v6, and HA play complementary roles in the development and progression of breast cancer.     

Loss of heterozygosity or allele imbalance in histologically normal breast epithelium is distinct from loss of heterozygosity or allele imbalance in co-existing carcinomas

To better understand early steps in human breast carcinogenesis, we examined allele imbalance or loss of heterozygosity (LOH), in co-existing normal-appearing breast epithelium and cancers. We microdissected a total of 173 histologically normal ducts or terminal ductolobular units (TDLUs) and malignant epithelial samples from 18 breast cancer cases, and examined their DNA for LOH at 21 microsatellite markers on 10 chromosome arms. Fourteen of 109 (13%) normal ducts/TDLUs, from 8 of 18 (44%) cases, contained LOH. The location of these 14 ducts/TDLUs appeared unrelated to distance from the cancer. LOH in normal-appearing epithelium involved only single markers, whereas LOH in cancers commonly encompassed all informative markers on a chromosome arm. In only 1 of 14 (7%) ducts/TDLUs with LOH, was the same LOH seen in the co-existing cancer. Global differences in LOH per arm in normal-appearing tissue were not demonstrated, but less LOH was seen at 11q and 17p than at 1q (P = 0.002), 16q (P = 0.01), and possibly 17q (P = 0.06). These results indicate that in a large fraction of women with breast cancer, histologically normal breast epithelium harbors occult aberrant clones. Individual clones rarely are precursors of co-existing cancers. However, they might constitute a reservoir from which proliferative lesions or second cancers develop once additional genetic abnormalities occur, they could contribute to intratumoral genetic heterogeneity, and they are consistent with a role for genetic instability early in tumorigenesis.     

Nuclear cytometric changes in breast carcinogenesis

Breast cancer is thought to originate through progressively aberrant precursor lesions, paralleled by increasing morphological changes. The aim of this study was to quantify nuclear features by image cytometry in invasive breast cancer and its early (hyperplasia) and late (ductal carcinoma in situ) precursor lesions, in order to objectively describe nuclear changes in the spectrum of proliferative intraductal and invasive breast lesions. Image cytometry was performed on tissue sections of 20 samples of normal breast tissue, 71 of usual ductal hyperplasia (UDH), nine of atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH), and 11 of well-differentiated and 13 of poorly differentiated ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) lesions. The invasive breast carcinomas consisted of 19 well-differentiated and 24 poorly differentiated lesions. Through the spectrum from normal breast tissue to invasive carcinoma, progressive changes in many nuclear features were measured. Significant differences were found between nuclei of florid ductal hyperplasia compared with mild and moderate ductal hyperplastic lesions, suggesting that florid ductal hyperplasia may be a more advanced lesion than assumed and may contain cancer precursor cells. No differences were found between ADH and well-differentiated DCIS, suggesting that these lesions are closely related. Feature values of well-differentiated DCIS were comparable to values found in well-differentiated invasive carcinoma and the same applied to poorly differentiated DCIS and invasive lesions. These results support the hypothesis that breast cancer develops through different routes of progression, one leading to well-differentiated invasive cancer through well-differentiated DCIS, and one leading to poorly differentiated invasive cancer through poorly differentiated DCIS. In conclusion, image cytometry reveals progressive changes in nuclear morphological and subvisual chromatin distribution features in the spectrum from intraductal proliferations to invasive breast cancer. This provides evidence for a progression from usual to atypical ductal hyperplasia and then to invasive cancer, through different routes for well-differentiated and poorly differentiated lesions.     

Elevated expression of LSD1 (Lysine-specific demethylase 1) during tumour progression from pre-invasive to invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast

ABSTRACT: AimLysine-specific demethylase1 (LSD1) is a nuclear protein which belongs to the aminooxidase-enzymes playing an important role in controlling gene expression. It has also been found highly expressed in several human malignancies including breast carcinoma. Our aim was to detect LSD1 expression also in pre-invasive neoplasias of the breast. In the current study we therefore analysed LSD1 protein expression in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) in comparison to invasive ductal breast cancer (IDC). METHODS: Using immunohistochemistry we systematically analysed LSD1 expression in low grade DCIS (n = 27), intermediate grade DCIS (n = 30), high grade DCIS (n = 31) and in invasive ductal breast cancer (n = 32). SPSS version 18.0 was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: LSD1 was differentially expressed in DCIS and invasive ductal breast cancer. Interestingly, LSD1 was significantly overexpressed in high grade DCIS versus low grade DCIS. Differences in LSD1 expression levels were also statistically significant between low/intermediate DCIS and invasive ductal breast carcinoma. CONCLUSION: LSD1 is also expressed in pre-invasive neoplasias of the breast. Additionally, there is a gradual increase of LSD1 expression within tumour progression from pre-invasive DCIS to invasive ductal breast carcinoma. Therefore upregulation of LSD1 may be an early tumour promoting event.     

Comparative features of ductal carcinoma in situ and infiltrating ductal carcinoma of the breast on fine-needle aspiration biopsy

To evaluate the usefulness of fine-needle aspiration biopsy of the breast in separating ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) from infiltrating ductal carcinoma, the authors reviewed 16 preoperative fine-needle aspiration biopsies from biopsy-proven exclusive DCIS and 39 fine-needle aspiration biopsies from infiltrating ductal carcinomas with or without an in situ component. Seven (44%) of the DCIS and eight (21%) of the infiltrating ductal carcinomas had inadequate material for diagnosis on the aspiration biopsy. Five (32%) of the DCIS and 29 (74%) of the infiltrating ductal carcinomas caused suspicion or had positive results for malignancy. Four (25%) of the DCIS and two (5%) of the infiltrating ductal carcinomas showed atypical cells. Morphologic features of the atypical or malignant cells in the adequate specimens from these two lesions were similar except that the cells from the infiltrating ductal carcinomas showed more irregular nuclear spacing (94% vs. 44%, P less than 0.01) and more pronounced nuclear overlapping (65% vs. 33%) than those from the DCIS. In addition, the fine-needle aspiration biopsies of the DCIS tended to be hypocellular (less than 10 cells/10X) (44% vs. 6.5%, P less than 0.05) and to contain benign epithelial cells (22% vs. 6.5%) and macrophages (33% vs. 13%). Although the suspicion of DCIS might be raised when hypocellularity, benign epithelial cells, and macrophages are noted in a fine-needle aspiration biopsy of the breast that has positive results or causes suspicion for malignancy, fine-needle aspiration biopsy cannot be relied upon to distinguish DCIS from infiltrating ductal carcinoma.     

Distribution of calponin and smooth muscle myosin heavy chain in fine-needle aspiration biopsies of the breast

The cell types that may be present in any fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) of breast include epithelial cells (EC), myoepithelial cells (MEC), bipolar stromal cells (BSC), vascular pericytes/endothelial cells (VPEC), and adipose cells (AC). The recognition of most of these benign cellular elements in aspirates of the breast is relatively straightforward, based on distinct cytomorphologic criteria. However, there is controversy regarding the recognition of MEC because BSC are often referred to as MEC by cytopathologists. It is important to identify MEC in breast aspirates, because their presence has been associated with benign epithelial proliferations. In this study we used immunocytochemical methods on archival cytology slides with antibodies specific for MEC, calponin, and smooth muscle myosin heavy chain (SMMHC), to determine the distribution of MEC in FNAB of the breast and to ascertain the distribution of MEC in in situ and invasive carcinomas. Fifteen benign FNABS of breast and corresponding tissue biopsies were obtained along with 10 malignant FNABS and corresponding excisional breast biopsies from 1989-1993. Calponin and SMMHC antibodies were used on archival alcohol-fixed Papanicolaou-stained direct smears as well as the corresponding tissue sections. The distribution and pattern of positive immunostaining with both antibodies were recorded on the benign elements and the carcinomas for both cytologic and histologic slides. Benign breast tissues demonstrated strong continuous immunostaining for calponin and SMMHC of MEC. The interlobular stromal cells as well as intralobular stromal cells showed no immunostaining with either antibody. In cytologic preparations, MEC staining with calponin and SMMHC appeared as spindle cells between epithelial cells or along the edges of the epithelial groups. The bipolar stromal cells did not stain with either antibody. The tissues with DCIS (ductal carcinoma in situ) often showed the presence of MEC with strong calponin immunostaining, but sometimes the immunostaining was discontinuous or entirely absent around markedly dilated ducts. The SMMHC antibody was invariably negative, with architectural DCIS in dilated ducts. Two cases of DCIS with prominent periductal fibrosis or inflammation were positive for calponin, but the periductal stromal cells were calponin- and SMMHC-negative. Invasive carcinoma was negative for both calponin and SMMHC, but areas of DCIS were often positive in a discontinuous pattern. In conclusion, 1) Benign cellular elements from breast tissue FNAB showed strong continuous decoration of MEC with both calponin and SMMHC. Vascular pericytes and vascular smooth muscle were positive for both antibodies, but these cells were not observed in the FNAB. Benign proliferative epithelium showed no local increase in MEC with either antibody. Bipolar stromal cells in tissue and smears did not stain for MEC antibodies. 2) BSC did not correspond morphologically to MEC, and were not decorated with calponin or SMMHC. 3) Calponin-positive MEC were commonly associated with in situ ductal lesions, although they may at times have been discontinuous or absent entirely. DCIS may be recognized in FNAB by the presence of calponin-positive MEC associated with tumor cell groups. 4) Invasive carcinomas were invariably negative for MEC with these antibodies.     

乳腺导管原位癌组织学分级与其他预后因素的关系

目的　探讨乳腺导管原位癌组织学分级与分型以及ｃｅｒｂＢ２ 蛋白、ｐ５３ 蛋白、ＭＩＢ１ 、雌激素受体（ＥＲ） 表达的关系,以期为临床判断潜在恶性程度及预后提供参数。方法　参照Ｖａｎ Ｎｕｙｓ 分类方法,对３２ 例乳腺导管原位癌按核的分级、有无坏死进行组织学分级,并将标本行ｃｅｒｂＢ２ 蛋白、ｐ５３ 蛋白、ＭＩＢ１、ＥＲ的枸橼酸微波ＡＢＣ免疫组化法染色。结果　Ⅰ级（分化好）１２ 例（３７．５％ ） ,Ⅱ级（中度分化）９ 例（２８．１％ ） ,Ⅲ级１１ 例（３４．４％ ）。Ⅲ级患者中,９ 例为粉刺型,１ 例为微乳头状型,１ 例为实体型,Ⅲ级的ｃｅｒｂＢ２、ｐ５３ 和ＭＩＢ１ 蛋白表达的阳性率分别高于Ⅱ级和Ⅰ级,并与Ⅰ级比较差异有显著意义（ Ｐ＜０．０５） ,ＥＲ阳性率低于Ⅱ级和Ⅰ级。结论　乳腺导管原位癌Ｖａｎ Ｎｕｙｓ 组织学分级可能是一个较好的预后指标。     

Immunohistochemical expression of E‐cadherin in sclerosing adenosis,ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast

E‐cadherin (EC) is an important glycoprotein cell‐adhesion molecule that appears to play a significant role in the progression of breast lesions. The objective of this study was to evaluate EC expression in sclerosing adenosis, ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive ductal carcinoma. Samples of breast lesions from 44 women were used in this study, comprising cases of sclerosing adenosis (n = 11), ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) (n = 10) and invasive ductal carcinoma (n = 23). Immunohistochemical evaluation of EC expression was assessed semiquantitatively and considered negative (<10% of cells with stained cytoplasmic membranes), positive+ (10–50% of cells stained) or positive++ (> 50% of cells stained). Fisher's exact test was used to compare the distribution of staining intensity in the lesions (P< 0.05). There was a progressive loss of EC expression from benign to malignant lesions. This difference was statistically significant when sclerosing adenosis was compared with DCIS (P < 0.0002), when sclerosing adenosis was compared with invasive ductal carcinoma (P < 0.008) and when DCIS was compared with invasive ductal carcinoma (P < 0.007). The present findings point to a significant association between reduced EC expression and the progression and aggressivity of breast lesions. Diagn. Cytopathol. 2010. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Matriptase and survivin expression associated with tumor progression and malignant potential in breast cancer of Chinese women: tissue microarray analysis of immunostaining scores with clinicopathological parameters

Objective: The aim of this study was to examine the expression of matriptase and survivin in breast carcinoma and correlate with clinicopathological parameters. Methods: Immunohistochemical analysis of matriptase and survivin were performed in tissue microarray slides of 290 cases, including 11 normal breast tissue; 27 fibrocystic disease; 17 fibroadenoma; 6 atypical ductal hyperplasia; 39 ductal carcinoma in situ, low grade (DCIS, low grade); 39 ductal carcinoma in situ, high grade (DCIS, high grade); 27 invasive ductal carcinoma, grade I (IDC, grade I); 78 invasive ductal carcinoma, grade II (IDC, grade II); and 46 invasive ductal carcinoma, grade III (IDC, grade III). Results: The average immunostaining scores of matriptase were 44.1 in normal breast tissue, 52.7 in fibrocystic disease, 76.5 in fibroadenoma, 81.7 in atypical ductal hyperplasia, 133.7 in low-grade DCIS, and 155.8 in high-grade DCIS. Among 151 breast IDC cases, the average immunostaining scores of matriptase were 172.7 in grade I, 211.7 in grade II, and 221.2 in grade III. Additionally, the average immunostaining scores of surviving also correlate with tumor grades and stages. Conclusions: Higher expressions of matriptase and survivin correlate significantly with clinicopathological parameters in breast cancer and the malignant potential in premalignant lesions. In addition, higher survivin expression had poorer prognosis of breast IDC cases.