The safety of gliptins : updated data in 2018

Introduction: Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4is) are generally considered as glucose-lowering agents with a safe profile in type 2 diabetes.

Areas covered: An updated review of recent safety data from randomised controlled trials, observational studies, meta-analyses, pharmacovigilance reports regarding alogliptin, linagliptin, saxagliptin, sitagliptin, and vildagliptin, with a special focus on risks of hypoglycemia, pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer, major cardiovascular events, hospitalisation for heart failure and other new safety issues, such as bone fractures and arthralgia. The safety of DPP-4i use in special populations, elderly patients, patients with renal impairment, liver disease or heart failure, will also be discussed.

Expert opinion: The good tolerance/safety profile of DPP-4is has been largely confirmed, including in more fragile populations, with no gastrointestinal adverse effects and a minimal risk of hypoglycemia. DPP-4is appear to be associated with a small increased incidence of acute pancreatitis in placebo-controlled trials, although most observational studies are reassuring. Most recent studies with DPP-4is do not confirm the increased risk of hospitalisation for heart failure reported with saxagliptin in SAVOR-TIMI 53, but further post-marketing surveillance is still recommended. New adverse events have been reported such as arthralgia, yet a causal relationship remains unclear.     

Safety of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors for treating type 2 diabetes

Introduction: Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors (gliptins) occupy a growing place in the armamentarium of drugs used for the management of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes, although some safety concerns have been raised in recent years.

Areas covered: An updated review providing an analysis of available safety data (meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, observational cohort and case–control studies and pharmacovigilance reports) with five commercialized DPP-4 inhibitors (sitagliptin, vildagliptin, saxagliptin, alogliptin, linagliptin). A special focus is given to overall safety profile; pancreatic adverse events (AEs) (acute pancreatitis, pancreatic cancer); overall cardiovascular safety (myocardial infarction and stroke); congestive heart failure concern and finally, safety in special populations (elderly, renal impairment).

Expert opinion: The good tolerance/safety profile of DPP-4 inhibitors has been largely confirmed, including in more fragile populations (elderly, renal impairment) with almost no increased risk of infection or gastrointestinal AEs, no weight gain and a minimal risk of hypoglycemia. Although an increased risk of acute pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer was suspected, the complete set of available data appears reassuring so far. Cardiovascular safety of DPP-4 inhibitors has been proven but an unexpected increased risk of heart failure has been reported which should be confirmed in ongoing trials and better understood. Further postmarketing surveillance is recommended.     

Empagliflozin/linagliptin single-pill combination therapy for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Introduction: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is typically progressive, with sequential addition of therapies often needed to address increasing hyperglycemia over the disease course. Using treatments in combination may be preferred to sequential addition, as a means of providing a more rapid clinical response and potentially avoiding clinical inertia. In such cases, a single-pill combination can help to reduce pill burden. Although various single-pill combinations of oral glucose-lowering agents are available, empagliflozin/linagliptin was the first approved combination of a sodium glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor with a dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) inhibitor in the United States.

Areas covered: Two publications of the clinical trial investigating the efficacy and safety of single-pill combinations of empagliflozin/linagliptin in treatment-naive or metformin-treated patients with T2DM (NCT01422876) are reviewed, and their potential impact on clinical practice is discussed.

Expert opinion: The study discussed provides evidence for the efficacy and safety of empagliflozin/linagliptin single pills. Addition of an empagliflozin/linagliptin single pill may be considered in patients with inadequate glycemic control on metformin, or as an alternative to first-line treatment with empagliflozin or linagliptin when metformin is not suitable, particularly in patients with very poor glycemic control, or those who need to achieve target more quickly.     

A safety evaluation of empagliflozin plus linagliptin for treating type 2 diabetes

Introduction: Dipeptidyl-peptidase-IV inhibitors (DPP-4i) and sodium-glucose-transporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i) are oral antidiabetic drugs that improve glycemic parameters and possess a very low intrinsic hypoglycemia risk and favorable cardiovascular data.

Areas covered: An overview on the clinical studies investigating the combination therapy with the DPP-4i linagliptin and the SGLT-2i empagliflozin is given. The clinical evidence for the efficacy and safety of free combinations as well as for their fixed dose combinations is presented. Empagliflozin has recently proved to reduce cardiovascular risk in type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular high risk situations. A fixed dose combination (FDC) of empagliflozin and linagliptin as add on therapy to metformin or as initial treatment lowered the HbA1c by approximately 1.1% and reduced the body weight by 2.0–3.0 kg. The hypoglycemia risk was not significantly increased. The relevant studies were identified by a search in Medline and in clinicaltrials.gov.

Expert opinion/commentary: A DPP-4i/SGLT-2i FDC may be especially useful to simplify treatment, to reduce the tablet burden and to increase medication adherence. This FDC may be particularly beneficial for patients where the reduction of body weight, blood pressure and cardiovascular risk are important and in whom hypoglycemia should be avoided.     

Pharmacokinetic drug evaluation of empagliflozin plus linagliptin for the treatment of type 2 diabetes

Introduction: Type 2 diabetes mellitus has become a growing epidemic and therefore efficient treatment strategies that target its management are needed. The treatment of diabetic patients often requires the combination of antidiabetic drug classes. Sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) block glucose reabsorption in the proximal renal tubules. Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4i) improve glucose metabolism by blocking the enzyme that degrades incretins leading to increased insulin secretion.

Areas covered: The aim of the review is to present the available data on pharmacokinetic properties/pharmacodynamics, metabolic and cardiovascular effects of empagliflozin plus linagliptin combination.

Expert opinion: Both empagliflozin and linagliptin have established safety and efficacy in the treatment of diabetes. Available data demonstrate the absence of pharmacological interactions when the two drugs are given together. The complementary mechanisms of action would be expected to provide additive benefits on carbohydrate metabolism variables, but the results from clinical trials have shown that the empagliflozin/linagliptin combination provides only mild improvements of glycated hemoglobin compared with either monotherapy. However, the single-tablet formulation of empagliflozin/linagliptin is expected to provide better compliance and thus improved glycaemic control coupled with a favourable safety profile. Thus, the fixed-dose combination of empagliflozin/linagliptin has the capacity to both effectively and safely manage diabetic patients.     

Dose adjustment of metformin and dipeptidyl-peptidase IV inhibitors in diabetic patients with renal dysfunction

Objectives: This analysis of real-world data aimed to (a) determine the proportion of Type II diabetes (T2DM) patients treated with metformin or dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4i) that require dose adjustment or therapy discontinuation due to chronic kidney disease (CKD), and (b) to assess the time required to dose adjustment from the time of worsening of CKD.

Methods: In this retrospective study, two study populations were defined in a large healthcare organization. In the cross-sectional analysis, the distribution of CKD stages and the appropriate dosage of metformin and DPP-4i in 2013 was examined according to renal function among T2DM patients. In the longitudinal analysis, a cohort was defined to assess the time elapsed from first indication worsening of CKD to dose adjustment, among patients treated with those medications during years 2006–2013.

Results: Among patients treated with metformin or DPP-4i, one third of patients with CKD failed to adjust the dosage or to discontinue metformin or DPP-4i as indicated. Median time for dose adjustment or discontinuation was significantly longer for DPP-4i than for metformin (9.8 compared to 16.8 months for metformin and DPP-4i, respectively; p-value <.001).

Conclusions: This real-world data analysis showed that adjustment of dose or discontinuation of metformin or DPP-4i in patients with worsening CKD occurred less often in DPP-4i users than metformin users and took a longer time.     

A review of gliptins for 2014

Introduction: Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors (gliptins) occupy an increasing place in the armamentarium of drugs used for the management of hyperglycaemia and offer new opportunities for a personalized medicine in patients with Type 2 diabetes.

Areas covered: An updated review providing an analysis of available recent data with commercialized DPP-4 inhibitors, with a special focus on: differences between the various molecules, novelties regarding their mechanism of action, clinical efficacy in mono- and various combined therapies, comparison with other new therapies, efficacy-safety profile in at risk patients, concern about pancreatic safety, perspectives in cardiovascular prevention and, finally, a selection of remaining unanswered important questions for the clinician.

Expert opinion: DPP-4 inhibitors offer various advantages when compared to other glucose-lowering agents. Despite they have been commercialized since a few years only, available data obtained in randomised controlled trials are of better quality compared to those available with ancient classical glucose-lowering agents, especially in more fragile populations such as elderly people, individuals with renal impairment or at high cardiovascular risk and patients at higher risk of hypoglycaemia. However, there remain uncertainties and controversies that should be resolved by further ongoing large prospective controlled trials and increasing clinical experience combined with a careful post-marketing surveillance.     

Pharmacokinetic drug evaluation of saxagliptin plus dapagliflozin for the treatment of type 2 diabetes

Introduction: Combining a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor and a sodium-glucose cotransporter type 2 inhibitor is an attractive option to treat hyperglycaemia in type 2 diabetes.

Areas covered: The saxagliptin plus dapagliflozin combination is carefully analysed, focusing on: 1) pharmacokinetic properties, 2) pharmacodynamics data, and 3) results of randomised controlled trials (dual combination versus either monotherapy, sequential therapy saxagliptin added to dapagliflozin or dapagliflozin added to saxagliptin).

Expert opinion: Pharmacokinetic findings demonstrate the absence of drug-drug interaction and the bioequivalence of the FDC compared with separated tablets. Pharmacodynamic observations confirm a complementary mode of action of the two agents. Dual saxagliptin-dapagliflozin therapy is more potent than either monotherapy. It may be used as an initial combination, although this approach remains debatable and should probably be reserved in case of high glycated hemoglobin, or a stepwise strategy, according to a personalized approach. The developed saxagliptin-dapagliflozin FDC may simplify anti-hyperglycemic therapy and improve drug compliance.     

Empagliflozin and linagliptin combination therapy for treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Introduction: Many patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) fail to achieve the desired A1c goal because the antidiabetic medications used do not correct the underlying pathophysiologic abnormalities and monotherapy is not sufficiently potent to reduce the A1c to the 6.5 – 7.0% range. Insulin resistance and islet (beta and alpha) cell dysfunction are major pathophysiologic abnormalities in T2DM. We examine combination therapy with linagliptin plus empagliflozin as a therapeutic approach for the treatment of inadequately controlled T2DM patients.

Areas covered: A literature search of all human diabetes, metabolism and general medicine journals from year 2000 to the present was conducted. Glucagon like peptide-1 (GLP-1) deficiency/resistance contributes to islet cell dysfunction by impairing insulin secretion and increasing glucagon secretion. DPP-4 inhibitors (DPP4i) improve pancreatic islet function by augmenting glucose-dependent insulin secretion and decreasing elevated plasma glucagon levels. Linagliptin, a DPP-4 inhibitor, reduces HbA1c, is weight neutral, has an excellent safety profile and a low risk of hypoglycemia. The expression of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) in the proximal renal tubule is upregulated in T2DM, causing excess reabsorption of filtered glucose. The SGLT2 inhibitor (SGLT2i), empagliflozin, improves HbA_1c by causing glucosuria and ameliorating glucotoxicity. It also decreases weight and blood pressure, and has a low risk of hypoglycemia.

Expert opinion: The once daily oral combination of linagliptin plus empagliflozin does not increase the risk of hypoglycemia and tolerability and discontinuation rates are similar to those with each as monotherapy. At HbA1c values below 8.5% linagliptin/empagliflozin treatment produces an additive effect, whereas above 8.5%, there is a less than additive reduction with combination therapy compared with the effect of each agent alone. Linagliptin/empagliflozin addition is a logical combination in patients with T2DM, especially those with an HbA1c < 8.5%.     

Antidiabetic agents and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with heart diseases

Introduction: This article reviews evidence of the benefits and risk of antidiabetic agents in cardiovascular (CV) outcomes, with a focus on medications approved by the FDA since 2008.

Study selection: Peer-reviewed articles were identified from MEDLINE and Current Content databases (both 1966 to 1 October 2016) using the search terms insulin, metformin, rosiglitazone, pioglitazone, glyburide, glipizide, glimepiride, acarbose, miglitol, albiglutide, exenatide, liraglutide, lixisenatide, dulaglutide, pramlintide, meglitinide, alogliptin, linagliptin, saxagliptin, sitagliptin, canagliflozin, dapagliflozin, empagliflozin, colesevalam, bromocriptine, mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), heart failure (HF), and stroke. Trials were included if they were randomized clinical trials evaluating adult patients (≥18 years) with type 2 diabetes; had a period of intervention and follow-up of ≥12 months; and assessed CV outcomes (CV death, fatal/non-fatal MI or HF) as endpoints. Twenty-three randomized trials were included.

Antidiabetic agents: Of agents approved prior to 2008, metformin has not been associated with measurable harm in patients with diabetes in terms of mortality and CV events (and has a trend of benefit). Controversial results existed with the use of sulfonylureas and thiazolidinediones (TZDs) for CV outcomes. Among agents approved after 2008, liraglutide and empagliflozin have been shown to be superior to placebo in improving CV outcomes.

Conclusions: The FDA regulatory mandate to demonstrate CV safety in order to approve new diabetes drugs led to an increase in the number of CV outcome trials. However, these trials have placebo-controlled, non-inferiority designs aiming to show absence of CV toxicity. More studies are needed to address other questions, including comparative effectiveness, and longer-term risk versus benefits.     

Safety evaluation of trelagliptin in the treatment of Japanese type 2 diabetes mellitus patients

Introduction: Trelagliptin is a novel, long-acting dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitor approved for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in japan. The safety and efficacy of trelagliptin has been evaluated in three published clinical trials to date: one phase II and two phase III studies. As trelagliptin only requires dosing once per week, this new agent has the potential to improve compliance and subsequently, glycaemic control, in patients with T2DM.

Areas covered: This article reviews the available safety data for trelagliptin from published clinical trials, and evaluates the published safety profile relative to competitor once-daily and once-weekly DPP-4 inhibitors.

Expert opinion: Clinical trial data to date suggest that trelagliptin is a safe and efficacious medication with a similar safety profile to once-daily DPP-4 inhibitors, and to the once-weekly DPP-4 inhibitor, omarigliptin. Trelagliptin is well tolerated when given alone, and in combination with other anti-diabetic medications. An advantage of trelagliptin over existing once-daily DPP-4 inhibitors is the decrease of dosing frequency, rather than once-daily. No specific, serious adverse events have been reported for trelagliptin in published clinical trials, making it an attractive alternative to other DPP-4 inhibitors.     

Anagliptin decreases serum lathosterol level in patients with type 2 diabetes: a pilot study

Objective: The mechanism responsible for the lipid-lowering effect of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors remains unknown in humans. We evaluated the effect of anagliptin on serum lipid profiles, including cholesterol synthesis and absorption markers, in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes.

Methods: Thirty patients with type 2 diabetes (20 – 70 years old, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) level over 120 mg/dl, and no history of treatment with antidiabetic or antihyperlipidemic drugs) were enrolled. One hundred milligrams of anagliptin were administered twice a day for a month.

Results: After treatment of anagliptin, the LDL-C and total cholesterol (TC) levels did not decrease overall, but the TC level decreased significantly in 28 patients whose HbA1c levels decreased. Lathosterol decreased significantly, whereas no changes in campesterol, sitosterol or cholestanol were observed.

Conclusion: These results of our study show no significant change in LDL-C, a tendency of decrease in TC and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) after treatment of anagliptin for 1 month. Anagliptin therapy decreased the cholesterol synthesis marker lathosterol without changing cholesterol absorption markers.     

First novel once-weekly DPP-4 inhibitor,trelagliptin, for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus

Introduction: Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors are weight neutral and well tolerated, and provide better glycaemic control for a longer period compared to conventional therapies. Despite the fact that various drugs are available, glycaemic control remains suboptimal in approximately half of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus; one of the major reasons for low medication adherence.

Areas covered: A novel DPP-4 inhibitor, trelagliptin, was approved in Japan in March 2015, and is the first once-weekly oral antidiabetic agent in the world. In this review, current issues concerning medication adherence for the treatment of diabetes are discussed followed by a summary of the characteristics and future expectations of trelagliptin, by reviewing the recent phase I, II, and III clinical studies of trelagliptin.

Expert opinion: Trelagliptin has demonstrated superiority to placebo and non-inferiority to alogliptin, indicating its efficacy and tolerance in Japanese patients. Trelagliptin is expected to improve adherence and prevent complications. Due to the convenient dosing regimen, it is expected to be widely used in the clinical setting. A large-scale long-term study will help further confirm its long-term efficacy and safety, patients’ satisfaction, and medication adherence.     

Pharmacotherapy for gestational diabetes

Introduction: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) represents impaired carbohydrate metabolism during pregnancy and is characterized by progressive insulin resistance and compensatory hyperinsulinaemia. If inadequately treated, it may lead to fetal macrosomia and other adverse outcomes.

Areas covered: In this review, the authors summarize the current evidence from studies on the use of insulin and other agents for the treatment of women with GDM.

Expert opinion: Lifestyle management is of paramount importance for the treatment of GDM. In pharmacotherapy, insulin remains the long-established mainstay of treatment. NPH (Neutral Protamine Hagedorn) and soluble human insulin have long been established for use, but favorable experience has now also accumulated with the newer insulins (aspart, lispro, detemir). Alternatively, metformin and glyburide have been used in GDM, but they have never gained wide acceptance. Nutritional supplements based on micronutrients and bioactives (probiotics and myoinositol) have shown promising results as well. Further experience with incretin agents (DPP-4 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists) is awaited.     

Using DPP-4 inhibitors to modulate beta cell function in type 1 diabetes and in the treatment of diabetic kidney disease

Introduction: DPP-4 inhibitors have pleomorphic effects that extend beyond the anti-hyperglycemic labeled use of the drug. DPP-4 inhibitors have demonstrated promising renal protective effects in T2DM and T1DM and protective effects against immune destruction of pancreatic beta-cells in T1DM.

Areas covered: The efficacy of DPP-4 inhibitors in the treatment of diabetic kidney disease and possible adjunct with insulin in the treatment of T1DM to preserve beta-cell function. Pertinent literature was identified through Medline, PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov (1997-November 2018) using the search terms T1DM, sitagliptin, vildagliptin, linagliptin, beta-cell function, diabetic nephropathy. Only articles are written in the English language, and clinical trials evaluating human subjects were used.

Expert opinion: DPP-4 inhibitors can be used safely in patients with diabetic kidney disease and do not appear to exacerbate existing diabetic nephropathy. Linagliptin reduces albuminuria and protects renal endothelium from the deleterious effects of hyperglycemia. The effects of DPP-4 inhibitors on preserving beta-cell function in certain subtypes of T1DM [e.g. Latent Autoimmune Diabetes in Adult (LADA) and Slowly Progressive Type 1 Diabetes (SPIDDM)] are encouraging and show promise.     

Inhibitors of α-glucosidase and α-amylase from Cyperus rotundus

Context: A methanol extract of Cyperus rotundus L. (Cyperaceae) rhizomes showed inhibitory activity against α-glucosidase and α-amylase, two enzymes involve in carbohydrate digestion.

Objective: Identification of compounds from C. rotundus rhizomes responsible for the inhibition of α-glucosidase and α-amylase.

Materials and methods: Compounds were identified by a phytochemical investigation using combined chromatographic and spectroscopic methods. α-glucosidase and α-amylase inhibitory activities were evaluated by in vitro enzyme inhibition assays.

Results: A new (2RS,3SR)-3,4′,5,6,7,8-hexahydroxyflavane (1), together with three known stilbene dimers cassigarol E (2), scirpusin A (3) and B (4) were isolated. Compound 2 inhibited both α-glucosidase and α-amylase activities while the flavane 1 only showed effect on α-amylase, and compounds 3 and 4 were active on α-glucosidase. All four compounds showed significant 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) scavenging activity.

Discussion: The inhibitory activities against α-amylase and α-glucosidase of the C. rotundus rhizomes were reported for the first time. Stilbene dimers are considered as potent inhibitors of α-glucosidase and promising antihyperglycemic agents.

Conclusion: The isolated compounds may contribute to the antidiabetic property of C. rotundus.     

Early assessment of proarrhythmic risk of drugs using the in vitro data and single-cell-based in silico models: proof of concept

Background and purpose: To determine the predictive performance of in silico models using drug-specific preclinical cardiac electrophysiology data to investigate drug-induced arrhythmia risk (e.g. Torsade de pointes (TdP)) in virtual human subjects.

Experimental approach: To assess drug proarrhythmic risk, we used a set of in vitro electrophysiological measurements describing ion channel inhibition triggered by the investigated drugs. The Cardiac Safety Simulator version 2.0 (CSS; Simcyp, Sheffield, UK) platform was used to simulate human left ventricular cardiac myocyte action potential models.

Results: This study shows the impact of drug concentration changes on particular ionic currents by using available experimental data. The simulation results display safety threshold according to drug concentration threshold and log (threshold concentration/ effective therapeutic plasma concentration (ETPC)).

Conclusion and implications: We reproduced the underlying biophysical characteristics of cardiac cells resulted in effects of drugs associated with cardiac arrhythmias (action potential duration (APD) and QT prolongation and TdP) which were observed in published 3D simulations, yet with much less computational burden.     

Patient preferences for diabetes treatment attributes and drug classes

Objective: To identify which treatment attributes are most influential in determining patient preferences for diabetes treatments and explore patient preferences for diabetes drug classes.

Research design and methods: US adults with type 1 or type 2 diabetes completed an online adaptive conjoint analysis survey. The survey examined 14 attributes, including efficacy, regimen, and risk of common side effects and rare but serious adverse events. Respondents selected between hypothetical treatments with different attributes. Sawtooth Software, ordinary least-squares regression, and hierarchical Bayes regression were used to calculate utilities (i.e. preference weights), importance ratings, and shares of preference across 13 diabetes drug classes or combination products.

Results: A total of 167 adults (mean age 58 years; 55% female) with type 1 or type 2 diabetes completed the survey. Based on importance ratings, the most influential attributes driving preferences were regimen, risk of diarrhea, weight change, risk of hypoglycemia, and efficacy. Sodium–glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2is) were highly preferred in direct comparison to each of the other classes (range: 84.2–99.9%), with the exception of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4is); DPP-4is (52.9%) were preferred over SGLT-2is (47.1%).

Conclusions: Although preferences varied across participants, attributes with the greatest likelihood of affecting daily life and routine were generally more influential in determining patient preferences. DPP-4is and SGLT-2is were overwhelmingly preferred over other drug classes, primarily due to favorable regimen and side effect profiles. Understanding patient preferences can help optimize patient-centered treatment and may lead to improved patient satisfaction, adherence, and outcomes.

Limitations: The primary limitations of this study are that a small sample size of type 1 diabetes patients were included, which may reduce the reliability of the preference estimates, and patients were recruited from a patient panel and may not be representative of patients with diabetes in the US.     

Dosing strategies to optimize currently available anti-MRSA treatment options (Part 2: PO options)

Introduction: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a problematic pathogen in both outpatient and inpatient settings. Research to optimize the dosing of these agents is needed to slow the development of antimicrobial resistance and to decrease the likelihood of clinical failure.

Areas covered: This review summarizes the available data for orally administered antimicrobials routinely used as monotherapy for MRSA infections. We make recommendations and highlight the current gaps in the literature. A PubMed (1966 – Present) search was performed to identify relevant literature for this review.

Expert commentary: There is a vast divide in the amount of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic data to guide dosing decisions for older MRSA agents compared with the oxazolidenones.

Five-year view: Additional retrospective data will become available for the older MRSA agents in severe MRSA infections.     

The cardiovascular effect of incretin-based therapies among type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Objective: To evaluate the comparative cardiovascular safety of incretin-based therapies in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

Methods: Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Library and www.clinicaltrials.gov were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with duration≥12 weeks. Network meta-analysis was performed, followed by subgroup analysis and meta-regression. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation system was used to assess the quality of evidence. The outcome of interest was a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke and heart failure. Odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated as the measure of effect size.

Results: 281 RCTs (76.9% double-blinded) with 180,000 patients were included, comparing incretin-based therapies with other six classes of anti-diabetic drugs or placebo. A statistically significant reduction in the risk of cardiovascular events was found in favour of GLP-1RAs when compared with placebo (OR 0.89, 95%CI: 0.80–0.99) and sulfonylurea (OR 0.76, 95%CI: 0.59–0.99), whereas DPP-4 inhibitors showed a neutral effect compared with placebo (OR 0.92, 95%CI: 0.83–1.01).

Conclusions: Incretin-based therapies show similar cardiovascular risk in comparison with metformin, insulin, thiazolidinediones, alpha-glucosidase inhibitor and sodium-glucose co-transporter 2. GLP-1RA could decrease the risk compared with sulfonylurea or placebo, while DPP-4I appears to have neutral effect on cardiovascular risk.