Comparison of Abbott RealTime HCV Genotype II with Versant Line Probe Assay 2.0 for Hepatitis C Virus Genotyping

Genotyping and subtyping of 225 samples with hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1, 2, 3, or 6 infection were done with Versant LiPA 2.0 and Abbott RealTime HCV Genotype (GT) II by using direct sequencing of the NS5B and 5′ untranslated regions as the reference standards. The concordance rates were >99.2% for genotypes and 96.1% for subtypes 1a and 1b. Both the Abbott RealTime and Versant LiPA assays can accurately determine hepatitis C virus genotypes. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. {"type":"clinical-trial","attrs":{"text":"NCT00979979","term_id":"NCT00979979"}}NCT00979979.)     

Performance of the Abbott RealTime HCV Genotype II RUO Assay

The Abbott RealTime HCV Genotype II RUO (research use only) assay was evaluated using the automated Abbott RealTime m2000 system. Concordance was 98% (81/83 samples) with samples previously typed by the Versant HCV Genotype 2.0 RUO system with manual extraction. The total assay time was reduced from 10.5 to 6.0 h and hands-on time from 13 to 4 min/patient sample.     

Evaluation of the Abbott Investigational Use Only RealTime Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Assay and Comparison to the Roche TaqMan HCV Analyte-Specific Reagent Assay

The accurate and sensitive measurement of hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA is essential for the clinical management and treatment of infected patients and as a research tool for studying the biology of HCV infection. We evaluated the linearity, reproducibility, precision, limit of detection, and concordance of viral genotype quantitation of the Abbott investigational use only RealTime HCV (RealTime) assay using the Abbott m2000 platform and compared the results to those of the Roche TaqMan Analyte-Specific Reagent (TaqMan) and Bayer Versant HCV bDNA 3.0 assay. Comparison of 216 samples analyzed by RealTime and TaqMan assays produced the following Deming regression equation: RealTime = 0.940 (TaqMan) + 0.175 log₁₀ HCV RNA IU/ml. The average difference between the assays was 0.143 log₁₀ RNA IU/ml and was consistent across RealTime''s dynamic range of nearly 7 log₁₀ HCV RNA IU/ml. There was no significant difference between genotypes among these samples. The limit of detection using eight replicates of the World Health Organization HCV standard was determined to be 7.74 HCV RNA IU/ml by probit analysis. Replicate measurements of commercial genotype panels were significantly higher than TaqMan measurements for most samples and showed that the RealTime assay is able to detect all genotypes with no bias. Additionally, we showed that the amplicon generated by the widely used Roche COBAS Amplicor Hepatitis C Virus Test, version 2.0, can act as a template in the RealTime assay, but potential cross-contamination could be mitigated by treatment with uracil-N-glycosylase. In conclusion, the RealTime assay accurately measured HCV viral loads over a broad dynamic range, with no significant genotype bias.Methods for accurate quantitation of serum and plasma hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA levels have become key tools both for understanding the biology of HCV infection and for the clinical management of patients under treatment. The ability to predict likelihood of response to combination interferon/ribavirin therapy by assessing rates of HCV viral load decline has provided a more individualized treatment algorithm that can identify nonresponsive patients early in treatment, sparing them significant morbidity and cost. New algorithms that examine the kinetics of HCV viral decline provide an even more refined tool for management and complement the information provided by HCV genotype determination. Finally, HCV viral kinetics data are essential for the understanding of new therapeutics such as the class of protease inhibitors. For all applications, accurate quantitation of all HCV types over a broad dynamic range is critical. The advent of real-time PCR methods provides a powerful tool for a broad dynamic range of quantitation of viruses; however, targets such as HCV require careful assay design to avoid errors due to sequence variations intrinsic to RNA viruses.Abbott Molecular, Inc. (Des Plaines, IL), recently released the m2000 system and tests for human immunodeficiency virus type 1, HCV, and chlamydia/gonorrhea (Chlamydia trachomatis/Neisseria gonorrhea) in the European Union with Conformité Européene-marked certification, and the system was recently approved for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. The m2000 system consists of an eight-channel liquid handling platform (the m2000sp) for performing automated nucleic acid extraction and PCR preparation and of a real-time PCR platform (the m2000rt) for detection and quantification. We used the m2000 system to evaluate the sensitivity, reproducibility, linearity, and concordance of viral genotype quantitation of the Abbott Molecular investigational use only (IUO) RealTime HCV (RealTime) assay and compared aspects of its performance to the Roche TaqMan Analyte-Specific Reagent (ASR) (TaqMan) (Roche Molecular Systems, Inc., Branchburg, NJ) and Bayer Versant HCV bDNA 3.0 (bDNA) assay. In addition, we examined the potential for contamination by the Roche COBAS Amplicor Hepatitis C Virus Test, version 2.0 (Amplicor) (Roche Molecular Systems, Inc., Branchburg, NJ) and TaqMan amplicons and the effect of uracil-N-glycosylase (UNG) treatment in mitigating contamination from these widely used tests.     

Evaluation of Versant hepatitis C virus genotype assay (LiPA) 2.0

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotyping is a tool used to optimize antiviral treatment regimens. The newly developed Versant HCV genotype assay (LiPA) 2.0 uses sequence information from both the 5' untranslated region and the core region, allowing distinction between HCV genotype 1 and subtypes c to l of genotype 6 and between subtypes a and b of genotype 1. HCV-positive samples were genotyped manually using the Versant HCV genotype assay (LiPA) 2.0 system according to the manufacturer's instructions. For the comparison study, Versant HCV genotype assay (LiPA) 1.0 was used. In this study, 99.7% of the samples could be amplified, the genotype of 96.0% of samples could be determined, and the agreement with the reference method was 99.4% when a genotype was determined. The reproducibility study showed no significant differences in performance across sites (P = 0.43) or across lots (P = 0.88). In the comparison study, 13 samples that were uninterpretable or incorrectly genotyped with Versant HCV genotype assay (LiPA) 1.0 were correctly genotyped by Versant HCV genotype assay (LiPA) 2.0. Versant HCV genotype assay (LiPA) 2.0 is a sensitive, accurate, and reliable assay for HCV genotyping. The inclusion of the core region probes in Versant HCV genotype assay (LiPA) 2.0 results in a genotyping success rate higher than that of the current Versant HCV genotype assay (LiPA) 1.0.     

Reassessment of Genotype 1 Hepatitis C Virus Subtype Misclassification by LiPA 2.0: Implications for Direct-Acting Antiviral Treatment

The accuracy of LiPA 2.0 for hepatitis C virus 1 (HCV-1) subtype classification was analyzed. LiPA 2.0 genotype results from 101 HCV-1-infected patients were compared to genotype findings determined by direct core sequencing. Eleven (11%) samples were misclassified. Given the influence of the HCV-1-subtype in the anti-HCV therapy response, an alternative classification method is warranted.     

Automated RIBA Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Strip Immunoblot Assay for Reproducible HCV Diagnosis

A comparison between the CHIRON RIBA hepatitis C virus (HCV) processor and manual systems was performed by using 88 specimens repeatedly reactive by the second-generation HCV enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (HCV 2.0 ELISA) and 111 random specimens from volunteer donors. For the second-generation RIBA HCV strip immunoblot assay (SIA) (RIBA HCV 2.0 SIA), test results correlated strongly between the manual and the automated runs (kappa value, 0.937). For the RIBA HCV 3.0 SIA, the correlation of the test results was also high (kappa value, 0.899). Among the specimens with positive results by RIBA HCV 2.0 and 3.0 SIAs, there was a very strong concordance of the test results between the manual and the automated runs with regard to the reactive bands. Nine samples had discordant results between the manual and the automated runs; this was probably attributable to increased variability in antigen scores close to the cutoff values for both tests. Run-to-run and within-run testing by the CHIRON RIBA HCV Processor System showed a very low rate of conflicting values. In conclusion, the CHIRON RIBA HCV Processor System is capable of performing RIBA HCV 2.0 and 3.0 SIAs accurately with minimal operator involvement. In addition, the CHIRON RIBA HCV Processor System shows excellent reproducibility, with the potential for operator-to-operator and site-to-site variability being greatly reduced. Our data indicate that this novel methodology may be very useful for supplemental anti-HCV testing of specimens repeatedly reactive by ELISA in routine clinical assessments and epidemiologic evaluations.     

An OPTIMIZE Study Retrospective Analysis for Management of Telaprevir-Treated Hepatitis C Virus (HCV)-Infected Patients by Use of the Abbott RealTime HCV RNA Assay

Protease inhibitor (PI)-based response-guided triple therapies for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection are still widely used. Noncirrhotic treatment-naive and prior relapser patients receiving telaprevir-based treatment are eligible for shorter, 24-week total therapy if HCV RNA is undetectable at both weeks 4 and 12. In this study, the concordance in HCV RNA assessments between the Roche High Pure System/Cobas TaqMan and Abbott RealTime HCV RNA assays and the impacts of different HCV RNA cutoffs on treatment outcome were evaluated. A total of 2,629 samples from 663 HCV genotype 1 patients receiving telaprevir/pegylated interferon/ribavirin in OPTIMIZE were analyzed using the High Pure System and reanalyzed using Abbott RealTime (limits of detection, 15.1 IU/ml versus 8.3 IU/ml; limits of quantification, 25 IU/ml versus 12 IU/ml, respectively). Overall, good concordance was observed between the assays. Using undetectable HCV RNA at week 4, 34% of the patients would be eligible for shorter treatment duration with Abbott RealTime versus 72% with the High Pure System. However, using <12 IU/ml for Abbott RealTime, a similar proportion (74%) would be eligible. Of the patients receiving 24-week total therapy, 87% achieved a sustained virologic response with undetectable HCV RNA by the High Pure System or <12 IU/ml by Abbott RealTime; however, 92% of the patients with undetectable HCV RNA by Abbott RealTime achieved a sustained virologic response. Using undetectable HCV RNA as the cutoff, the more sensitive Abbott RealTime assay would identify fewer patients eligible for shorter treatment than the High Pure System. Our data confirm the <12-IU/ml cutoff, as previously established in other studies of the Abbott RealTime assay, to determine eligibility for shortened PI-based HCV treatment. (The study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. {"type":"clinical-trial","attrs":{"text":"NCT01241760","term_id":"NCT01241760"}}NCT01241760.)     

Treatment of Genotype 2 and Genotype 3 Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Infection in Human Immunodeficiency Virus Positive Patients

Approximately 25 % of persons living with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) are coinfected with the hepatitis C virus (HCV). In cohort studies of HIV-HCV coinfection, HCV genotypes 2 and 3 account for 15 %–64 % of disease. Compared with HCV monoinfection, liver disease is accelerated in coinfected patients, and anti-HCV treatment is less successful. This article reviews the current knowledge and recommendations for management of HCV genotype 2 and 3 infection in patients living with HIV. While pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN)/ ribavirin (RBV) remains the standard treatment for HCV genotype 2/3 infection, ongoing clinical trials with more effective therapies will soon be available. In particular, an IFN sparing regimen of sofosbuvir/RBV may become available in 2014. It is also evident that HCV genotypes 2 and 3 respond differently to therapy and should be approached differently both in practice and in clinical trials. Issues including drug-drug interactions between anti-HCV and anti-HIV therapies are addressed.     

The Cobas AmpliPrep/Cobas TaqMan HCV Test,Version 2.0, Real-Time PCR Assay Accurately Quantifies Hepatitis C Virus Genotype 4 RNA

Accurate hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA quantification is mandatory for the management of chronic hepatitis C therapy. The first-generation Cobas AmpliPrep/Cobas TaqMan HCV test (CAP/CTM HCV) underestimated HCV RNA levels by >1-log₁₀ international units/ml in a number of patients infected with HCV genotype 4 and occasionally failed to detect it. The aim of this study was to evaluate the ability of the Cobas AmpliPrep/Cobas TaqMan HCV test, version 2.0 (CAP/CTM HCV v2.0), to accurately quantify HCV RNA in a large series of patients infected with different subtypes of HCV genotype 4. Group A comprised 122 patients with chronic HCV genotype 4 infection, and group B comprised 4 patients with HCV genotype 4 in whom HCV RNA was undetectable using the CAP/CTM HCV. Each specimen was tested with the third-generation branched DNA (bDNA) assay, CAP/CTM HCV, and CAP/CTM HCV v2.0. The HCV RNA level was lower in CAP/CTM HCV than in bDNA in 76.2% of cases, regardless of the HCV genotype 4 subtype. In contrast, the correlation between bDNA and CAP/CTM HCV v2.0 values was excellent. CAP/CTM HCV v2.0 accurately quantified HCV RNA levels in the presence of an A-to-T substitution at position 165 alone or combined with a G-to-A substitution at position 145 of the 5′ untranslated region of HCV genome. In conclusion, CAP/CTM HCV v2.0 accurately quantifies HCV RNA in genotype 4 clinical specimens, regardless of the subtype, and can be confidently used in clinical trials and clinical practice with this genotype.     

Performance of the Abbott Real-Time PCR Assay Using m2000sp and m2000rt for Hepatitis C Virus RNA Quantification

Quantification of hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA is essential for the everyday management of chronic hepatitis C therapy. “Real-time” PCR techniques are potentially more sensitive than classical PCR techniques, are not prone to carryover contamination, and have a consistently wider dynamic range of quantification. Thus, they are rapidly replacing other technologies for routine quantification of HCV RNA. We extensively evaluated the intrinsic characteristics and clinical performance of the m2000_sp-m2000_rt Abbott real-time PCR platform for HCV RNA quantification. The study shows that the m2000_sp-m2000_rt platform is sensitive, specific, and precise; that the results are reproducible; and that the platform has a broad dynamic range of quantification. When comparing HCV RNA levels measured in the same individuals with the m2000_sp-m2000_rt platform and the third-generation branched-DNA assay, a trend toward a modest overestimation of HCV RNA levels was observed in the m2000_sp-m2000_rt platform in all genotypes except genotype 5. The differences, however, were unlikely to have any impact in clinical practice. In conclusion, our study shows that the Abbott m2000 real-time PCR system for HCV RNA quantification is sensitive, specific, and precise; that the results are reproducible; and that the platform''s broad dynamic range of quantification is well suited to HCV RNA monitoring in the clinical setting.Monitoring of hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA levels is essential for the management of chronic hepatitis C therapy with the combination of pegylated alpha interferon and ribavirin. Indeed, the rapid (undetectable HCV RNA at week 4 of therapy) and early (more than 2 log₁₀ drop or undetectable HCV RNA at week 12 of therapy) virologic response is a strong predictor of the likelihood of sustained viral eradication and is used to tailor the treatment duration and to improve cure rates (2, 6, 7, 10, 14, 16, 23, 26, 27). HCV RNA quantification will continue to be of major importance in the management of therapy with the new HCV drugs in development to assess the virologic response and to detect virologic breakthroughs related to viral resistance early enough to alter therapy and rescue antiviral efficacy (20).Ideally, HCV RNA quantification assays should be sensitive, specific, accurate, and precise, and the results should be reproducible. They should have a broad range of linear quantification that fully covers the HCV RNA levels observed in clinical practice in both untreated and treated patients, and quantification should be independent of the HCV genotype. Real-time PCR techniques currently are replacing classical PCR methods and the branched-DNA (bDNA) technology, which did not fulfill all of these criteria. Real-time PCR methods are sensitive, with lower limits of detection/quantification on the order of 10 to 15 HCV RNA international units (IU)/ml, and are not prone to carryover contamination. They benefit from a broad dynamic range of quantification of 7 to 8 log₁₀ units that covers most of the HCV RNA levels encountered in clinical practice.In this study, we investigated the intrinsic and clinical performances of the recently developed Abbott m2000 real-time PCR system for HCV RNA quantification, which uses the automated extractor m2000_sp and the m2000_rt device for automated real-time PCR amplification and detection of PCR products (m2000_sp-m2000_rt; Abbott Diagnostic, Chicago, IL).     

Performance characteristics of the COBAS Amplicor Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Monitor, Version 2.0, International Unit assay and the National Genetics Institute HCV Superquant assay

The COBAS Amplicor Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Monitor assay, version 2.0, which reports in international units per milliliter, was compared to the assay reported in copies per milliliter by analyzing dilution series and clinical plasma samples by both methods. In addition, the Amplicor international unit assay was compared to the National Genetics Institute HCV Superquant assay. The dilution series ranged from <100 to 5,000,000 HCV RNA copies/ml and consisted of 32 points, assayed in triplicate in each assay. Thirty clinical samples ranging from 1,000 to 1,000,000 HCV RNA copies/ml were assayed in duplicate. Deming regression analysis comparing the Amplicor HCV RNA international units-per-milliliter and copies-per-milliliter assays was calculated as follows: (Amplicor international units per milliliter) = 1.030(Amplicor copies per milliliter) - 0.392; R(2) = 0.981; n = 28; S(y/x) (standard error of the estimate) = 0.129. The linearity of the Amplicor international units-per-milliliter assay was as follows: observed = 0.886(expected) + 0.437; R(2) = 0.983; n = 30. The linearity of the Superquant assay was as follows: observed= 0.918 (expected) + 0.436; R(2) = 0.986; n = 32. Deming regression analysis comparing the Amplicor and Superquant assays was calculated as follows: Superquant = 1.066(Amplicor) - 0.0197; R(2) = 0.908; S(y/x) = 0.308; n = 28. The Amplicor and Superquant assays were linear through the range of 600 to 600,000 IU of HCV RNA/ml and approximately 300 to 5,000,000 HCV RNA copies/ml, respectively. The narrow range of the Amplicor assay means that some samples will require dilution and retesting for accurate quantification above 600,000 IU of HCV RNA/ml. The Amplicor and Superquant assays agreed well within the range of 600 to 600,000 IU of HCV RNA/ml (approximately 1,000 to approximately 1,000,000 HCV RNA copies/ml). Overall, the Amplicor and Superquant assays agree well, and results obtained in one assay could be expected to compare well with results from the other when reported in copies per milliliter.     

Abbott RealTime Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) and Roche Cobas AmpliPrep/Cobas TaqMan HCV Assays for Prediction of Sustained Virological Response to Pegylated Interferon and Ribavirin in Chronic Hepatitis C Patients

Two commercial real-time PCR assays are currently available for sensitive hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA quantification: the Abbott RealTime HCV assay (ART) and Roche Cobas AmpliPrep/Cobas TaqMan HCV assay (CAP/CTM). We assessed whether the two real-time PCR assays were more effective than Roche Cobas Amplicor HCV Monitor test, v.2.0 (CAM) for prediction of the sustained virological response (SVR) to pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN) plus ribavirin (RBV) in chronic hepatitis C. Sixty patients chronically infected with HCV genotype 1b (37 males and 23 females, 53 ± 12 years of age) were treated with PEG-IFNα2b plus RBV for 48 weeks. Stored specimens at nine time points for each patient (at baseline, on treatment, and 24 weeks after treatment) were tested by the two real-time PCR assays and CAM. Twenty-six (43.3%) patients reached SVR. The positive predictive values (PPVs) for SVR of undetectable HCV RNA at week 12 by CAM, ART, and CAP/CTM were 74.3%, 88.0%, and 95.2%, respectively. An undetectable HCV RNA level by CAM, ART, and CAP/CTM correctly predicted SVR at week 4 in 100%, 100%, and 100% of patients, at weeks 5 to 8 in 91.7%, 100%, and 100% of patients, at weeks 9 to 12 in 55.6%, 75%, and 87.5% of patients, and at weeks 13 to 24 in 0%, 26.7%, and 40% of patients, respectively. Of 16 patients who relapsed after treatment, HCV RNA was detectable in 2 patients at the end of treatment by CAP/CTM but undetectable by ART and CAM. HCV RNA tests using ART and CAP/CTM are considered to be more effective at predicting SVR than CAM, and the PPV for SVR was slightly higher in CAP/CTM than in ART.