Neostigmine and edrophonium antagonism of varying intensity neuromuscular blockade induced by atracurium, pancuronium, or vecuronium

To compare the time course of neostigmine and edrophonium antagonism of varying intensity neuromuscular blockade induced by atracurium, pancuronium, or vecuronium, the authors studied 98 patients anesthetized with nitrous oxide (60%) and halothane or enflurane. Neuromuscular blockade, as monitored by single stimulus-induced twitch tension (TT), was antagonized at varying degrees of spontaneous recovery (2-80% of control TT). Time to antagonism (time from injection of neostigmine or edrophonium to 90% recovery of control TT) was not different between edrophonium, 0.5 mg/kg, and neostigmine, 0.04 mg/kg, when spontaneous recovery had been allowed to occur to at least 11% of control TT prior to antagonist administration (P greater than 0.05). For profound neuromuscular blockade (TT less than or equal to 10% of control) induced by pancuronium or vecuronium, time (mean +/- SD) to antagonism with neostigmine, 0.04 mg/kg, was 7.0 +/- 2.2 min and 5.6 +/- 1.7 min, respectively, while the same for edrophonium, 0.5 mg/kg, was 20.0 +/- 8.0 min and 15.0 +/- 12.5 min, respectively (P less than 0.05). Time to antagonism of profound atracurium-induced neuromuscular blockade was 8.5 +/- 3.3 min for neostigmine, 0.04 mg/kg, and 9.8 +/- 7.0 min for edrophonium, 0.5 mg/kg, (P less than 0.05). For profound vecuronium-and pancuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade, time to antagonism by edrophonium, 1.0 mg/kg, was 4.6 +/- 3.0 min and 3.9 +/- 1.6 min respectively. The authors conclude that neostigmine, 0.04 mg/kg, antagonizes neuromuscular blockade within 12 min when TT is greater than 2% of control at time of reversal. When TT is greater than 10% of control, edrophonium, 0.5 mg/kg, produces similar time to antagonism.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Recovery times following edrophonium and neostigmine reversal of pancuronium, atracurium, and vecuronium steady-state infusions

The ability of edrophonium and neostigmine to antagonize nondepolarizing neuromuscular blockade produced by steady-state infusions of atracurium, pancuronium, and vecuronium was studied in 71 adult patients anesthetized with nitrous oxide and halothane. Infusion rates of blocking drugs were adjusted so that single twitch depression as measured by the evoked integrated EMG of the hypothenar muscles was kept at 10% of control. Two minutes after the termination of the infusion either edrophonium (0.75 mg/kg) or neostigmine (0.05 mg/kg) was administered. Single twitch depression and train-of-four (T4/T1) fade was recorded during the recovery period. T4/T1 fade ratios observed at 20 min postreversal were 0.80 (atracurium-edrophonium); 0.76 (vecuronium-edrophonium); 0.44 (pancuronium-edrophonium); 0.95 (atracurium-neostigmine); 0.89 (vecuronium-neostigmine); and 0.68 (pancuronium-neostigmine). Under conditions of this study neostigmine produced more rapid and complete recovery than did edrophonium. Although edrophonium produced adequate antagonism of atracurium if 20-30 min were allowed to elapse, edrophonium reversal of pancuronium was rarely acceptable even at 30 min. Increasing the dose of edrophonium to 1.0 mg/kg produced single twitch values of 0.90 at 5 min postreversal but did not increase the rate of recovery of the train-of-four fade ratio. Neostigmine reversal of pancuronium, on the other hand, generally produced T4/T1 ratios of greater than 0.70 in 20-30 min. Although the pattern of recovery seen after reversal of vecuronium was in general quite similar to that seen after atracurium, two patients in the vecuronium-edrophonium group showed delayed recovery and also failed to respond significantly to subsequent doses of neostigmine.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

A comparison of edrophonium and neostigmine for the antagonism of atracurium-induced neuromuscular block

Edrophonium, 0.5 mg/kg, or neostigmine, 0.05 mg/kg, was administered to groups of 20 patients each, for antagonism of atracurium-induced block at varying degrees of spontaneous recovery. Neuromuscular block was studied using train-of-four (TOF) stimulation. Adequate reversal of neuromuscular block (TOF ratio of 0.7) was achieved in all patients given neostigmine but only in 13 of the 20 given edrophonium. The onset of action of edrophonium (23 sec) was significantly more rapid than that of neostigmine (40 sec), as was the time taken to attain a TOF ratio of 0.7 in those in whom adequate antagonism was achieved (68 sec for edrophonium and 246 sec for neostigmine). Five of the seven patients in the edrophonium group who failed to be reversed adequately had shown three or fewer twitches to a TOF stimulation. It is concluded that edrophonium in a dose of 0.5 mg/kg does not consistently antagonize neuromuscular blockade induced by atracurium, particularly if all four responses to a TOF stimulation are not elicited prior to antagonism of the block.     

Dose-response relationships for edrophonium and neostigmine antagonism of atracurium and cisatracurium- induced neuromuscular block

PURPOSE: To study the dose-response relationships for neostigmine and edrophonium during antagonism of neuromuscular block induced by atracurium and cisatracurium. METHODS: One hundred and twenty eight, ASA group 1 or 2 adults were given either 0.5 mg x kg(-1) atracurium or 0.1 mg x kg(-1) cisatracurium during fentanyl-thiopental-nitrous oxide-isoflurane anesthesia. The neuromuscular block was measured by an acceleration-responsive transducer. Responses were defined in terms of percent depression in the first twitch (T1) and train-of-four (TOF) response. When spontaneous recovery of first twitch height reached 10% of its initial control value, edrophonium (0.1, 0.2, 0.4, or 1 mg x kg(-1)) or neostigmine (0.005, 0.01, 0.02, or 0.05 mg x kg(-1)) was administered by random allocation. Neuromuscular function in another sixteen subjects was allowed to recover spontaneously. RESULTS: At five minutes, unlike edrophonium, neostigmine was equally effective against atracurium and cisatracurium with respect to T1 recovery. The neostigmine T1-ED50 was 10.3 +/- 1.06 (SEM) microg x kg(-1) after atracurium and 11.2 +/- 1.06) microg x kg(-1) after cisatracurium. The edrophonium ED50 was 157 +/- 1.07 microg x kg(-1) with atracurium and 47.4 +/- 1.07 microg x kg(-1) with cisatracurium, giving a neostigmine:edrophonium potency ratios of 15.2 +/- 1.7 and 4.2 +/- 0.41 (P < 0.001) for atracurium and cisatracurium, respectively. At 10 min neostigmine was 13 +/- 1.4 times as potent as edrophonium for achieving 50% TOF recovery after atracurium paralysis. After cisatracurium the potency ratio was 11.8 +/- 1.3 (NS). CONCLUSIONS: Although there were differences at five minutes, neostigmine:edrophonium potency ratios at 10 min, were similar in both relaxants studied.     

Dose-response relationships for edrophonium and neostigmine as antagonists of moderate and profound atracurium blockade

To measure the ability of neostigmine and edrophonium to reverse moderate and profound atracurium blockade, dose-response relationships were established for these reversal agents given at 1% and 10% twitch height recovery. Eighty-five ASA I and II adult patients received atracurium, 0.4 mg/kg, during a thiopental-nitrous oxide-enflurane anesthetic. Train-of-four stimulation was applied every 12 seconds, and the force of contraction of the adductor pollicis muscle was recorded. Edrophonium, 0.1, 0.2, 0.4, or 1 mg/kg; neostigmine, 0.005, 0.01, 0.02 or 0.05 mg/kg; or no reversal agent was given when there was either 1% or 10% recovery of the first twitch response. With profound blockade, the slope of the edrophonium dose-response relationship was significantly flatter (P less than 0.05) than that of neostigmine. The dose of neostigmine required to achieve 80% first twitch recovery (ED80) after 10 minutes was 0.013 +/- 0.003 mg/kg (mean +/- SEM) if given at 10% recovery, and 0.032 +/- 0.004 mg/kg if given at 1% recovery. The ED80 for edrophonium was 0.22 +/- 0.04 mg/kg and 1.14 +/- 0.33 mg/kg, respectively. These values corresponded to neostigmine:edrophonium potency ratios of 16.6 +/- 3.5 and 35.3 +/- 8.9 at 90% and 99% blockade respectively (P less than 0.006). We conclude that the relative potency of neostigmine is greater than that of edrophonium for antagonism of profound atracurium blockade.     

Profound atracurium induced neuromuscular blockade

Speed of reversal of profound atracurium induced neuromuscular blockade following edrophonium (0.5 or 1.0 mg/kg) or neostigmine (0.04 or 0.08 mg/kg) was measured using the train-of-four pattern of nerve stimulation. In all patients adequate clinical reversal was present when the ratio of the strength of the fourth to the first twitch (T4 ratio) was 0.5. Both doses of edrophonium were associated with a significantly faster speed of reversal than the smaller dose of neostigmine (p less than 0.05 in both cases). However, the larger dose of neostigmine was associated with a reversal time approaching that of edrophonium. Possible explanations for these findings are discussed in terms of contemporary theories of neuromuscular pharmacology.     

Tactile evaluation of train-of-four count as an indicator of reliability of antagonism of vecuronium- or atracurium-induced neuromuscular blockade.

Recent evidence suggests that edrophonium is not the agent of choice to reverse profound neuromuscular blockade but remains an efficacious drug when the level of neuromuscular blockade to be antagonized is modest. We studied 90 healthy adults in an attempt to address the questions: 1) How much variability in such neuromuscular parameters as single twitch height and the train-of-four (TOF) fade ratio (T4/T1) exist when the TOF count first returns to four palpable responses? 2) Is edrophonium a reliable antagonist at this measured point of recovery? 3) What is the optimal dose of edrophonium needed to produce prompt (less than 10 min) and satisfactory (T4/T1 greater than 0.7) reversal when the fourth response of the thumb to indirect TOF stimulation just becomes palpable? Patients were given a bolus atracurium or vecuronium (n = 45 in each group) followed by an iv infusion sufficient to maintain single twitch as measured by electromyography at 10-15% of control values. At the end of surgery, the infusion was terminated and spontaneous recovery was allowed to begin. Once the tactile TOF count was four, edrophonium 0.3, 0.5, or 0.75 mg/kg was administered. At a count-of-four the first twitch averaged 37% of control (+/- 8.5% standard deviation; pooled data from all groups) and the mean T4/T1 ratio was 0.14 +/- 0.049. After atracurium neuromuscular blockade, edrophonium 0.3 mg/kg produced adequate antagonism in 10 min. At this time the mean T4/T1 ratio was 0.79 +/- 0.07 and the lowest observed value was 0.67. Increasing the edrophonium dose to 0.75 mg/kg accelerated recovery by 4-5 min.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Edrophonium and Neostigmine for Reversal of the Neuromuscular Blocking Effect of Vecuronium

The effect of edrophonium for reversal of the non-depolarizing neuromuscular blockade produced by a continuous infusion of vecuronium was compared to that of neostigmine in 20 adult patients during neurolept anaesthesia. When antagonism was attempted at 10% twitch height recovery, reversal time to a train-of-four ratio of 0.7 was significantly shorter following neostigmine 0.04 mg/kg than after edrophonium 0.75 mg/kg (9.8 min and 18.7 min, respectively) but the same after edrophonium 1.5 mg/kg (10.3 min). There was no statistically significant difference in reversal time between neostigmine 0.04 mg/kg given at 10% twitch height and edrophonium 0.75 mg/kg given at 25% twitch height recovery (6.0 min). Additional doses of atropine were necessary following edrophonium 1.5 mg/kg.     

Dose-response relationships for edrophonium and neostigmine as antagonists of atracurium and vecuronium neuromuscular blockade

To determine the potencies of edrophonium and neostigmine as antagonists of nondepolarizing neuromuscular blockade produced by atracurium and vecuronium, dose-response curves were constructed for both antagonists when given at 10% spontaneous recovery of first twitch height. Ninety ASA physical status 1 and 2 adults were given either 0.4 mg/kg atracurium or 0.08 mg/kg vecuronium during thiopental-nitrous oxide-enflurane anesthesia. Train-of-four stimulation was applied to the ulnar nerve every 12 s, and the force of contraction of the adductor pollicis muscle was recorded. When spontaneous recovery of first twitch height reached 10% of its initial control value, edrophonium (0.1, 0.2, 0.4, or 1 mg/kg) or neostigmine (0.005, 0.01, 0.02, or 0.05 mg/kg) was administered by random allocation. Neuromuscular function in another ten subjects was allowed to recover spontaneously. Assisted recovery was defined as actual recovery minus mean spontaneous recovery observed in patients who were not given antagonists. First twitch recovery was initially more rapid when vecuronium was antagonized compared with atracurium, but no difference was detected after 10 min. At 10 min the neostigmine ED80 was 0.022 +/- 0.003 (SEM) mg/kg after atracurium and 0.024 +/- 0.003 mg/kg after vecuronium. The edrophonium ED80 was 0.44 +/- 0.11 mg/kg with atracurium and 0.46 +/- 0.12 mg/kg with vecuronium, giving a neostigmine:edrophonium potency ratio of 20. Atracurium train-of-four fade could be antagonized more easily with edrophonium, whereas that of vecuronium was more easily antagonized by neostigmine. It is concluded that edrophonium and neostigmine are not equally effective against atracurium and vecuronium.     

The potencies of edrophonium and neostigmine as antagonists of pancuronium

Dose response curves were constructed for edrophonium and neostigmine when used to antagonise pancuronium, 0.07 mg/kg during thiopentone-nitrous oxide-halothane anaesthesia. The antagonist was given when 10% twitch height had been restored and the effect was measured 10 minutes later. Recoveries to 50% and 90% twitch height were achieved with 167 and 828 micrograms/kg of edrophonium, and 10.5 and 51 micrograms/kg of neostigmine. The dose response curves were parallel and neostigmine was 16 times more potent than edrophonium. Combinations of equipotent doses of edrophonium and neostigmine were also administered and produced additive but not synergistic effects. It is concluded that either edrophonium or neostigmine may be used for the reversal of pancuronium neuromuscular blockade, but the combination of the two offers no advantage.     

Dose-response curves for edrophonium, neostigmine, and pyridostigmine after pancuronium and d-tubocurarine

To determine the potencies of neostigmine, pyridostigmine, and edrophonium in reversing pancuronium and d-tubocurarine blockade, dose-response curves were established for first twitch height recovery and train-of-four ratio. One hundred and twenty ASA physical status I or II patients scheduled for elective surgery received either 0.06 mg/kg pancuronium or 0.36 mg/kg d-tubocurarine during a thiopental-nitrous oxide-enflurane anesthetic. Train-of-four stimulation was applied every 12 s, and the force of contraction of the adductor pollicis muscle was recorded. When first twitch height had recovered spontaneously to 10% of its initial value, neostigmine (0.005, 0.01, 0.02 or 0.05 mg/kg), pyridostigmine (0.02, 0.04, 0.1, or 0.2 mg/kg), or edrophonium (0.1, 0.2, 0.4 or 1 mg/kg) was injected by random allocation. Recovery was measured 10 min after the injection of the antagonist. First twitch ED50's were 0.013, 0.085, and 0.17 mg/kg after pancuronium, and 0.017, 0.11, and 0.27 mg/kg after d-tubocurarine, for neostigmine, pyridostigmine, and edrophonium, respectively. The ED50 for pyridostigmine and edrophonium obtained after d-tubocurarine was significantly larger (P less than 0.05) than that after pancuronium. The train-of-four dose-response curves were significantly flatter for edrophonium than for the other two agents, indicating a greater ability of edrophonium to antagonize fade at low doses. It is concluded that the potency of reversal agents may be different for different relaxants, and that potency ratios might depend upon the end-point chosen as full neuromuscular recovery.     

Neostigmine,pyridostigmine and edrophonium as antagonists of deep pancuronium blockade

To compare the ability of equipotent doses of neostigmine, pyridostigmine and edrophonium to antagonize intense pancuronium neuromuscular blockade, one hundred and twenty ASA physical status I or II patients scheduled for elective surgery received 0.06 mg.kg-1 pancuronium during a thiopentone nitrous oxide-enflurane anaesthetic. Train-of-four stimulation was applied every 12 s and the force of contraction of the adductor pollicis muscle was recorded. In the first 60 patients, spontaneous recovery was allowed until ten per cent of initial first twitch height. Then neostigmine (0.005, 0.01, 0.02 or 0.05 mg.kg-1), pyridostigmine (0.02, 0.04, 0.1 or 0.2 mg.kg-1), or edrophonium (0.1, 0.2, 0.4 or 1 mg.kg-1) was injected by random allocation. Dose-response relationships were established from the measurement of first twitch height (T1) ten minutes later. From these, neostigmine, 0.04 and 0.08 mg.kg-1 was found to be equipotent to pyridostigmine, 0.2 and 0.38 mg.kg-1, and edrophonium, 0.54 and 1.15 mg.kg-1, respectively. These doses were given by random allocation to the next 60 patients, but at one per cent spontaneous recovery. Neostigmine, 0.04 mg.kg-1, produced a T1 of 73 +/- 4 per cent (mean +/- SEM), and a train-of-four ratio (TOF) of 39 +/- 3 per cent. This was significantly greater than with pyridostigmine, 0.2 mg.kg-1 (T1 = 50 +/- 6 per cent; TOF = 25 +/- 3 per cent), and edrophonium, 0.54 mg.kg-1 (T1 = 54 +/- 3 per cent; TOF = 17 +/- 2 per cent).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

The Maximum Depth of an Atracurium Neuromuscular Block Antagonized by Edrophonium to Effect Adequate Recovery

Background: The inability of edrophonium to rapidly reverse a deep nondepolarizing neuromuscular block may be due to inadequate dosage or a ceiling effect to antagonism of neuromuscular block by edrophonium. A ceiling effect means that only a certain level of neuromuscular block could be antagonized by edrophonium. Neuromuscular block greater than this could not be completely antagonized irrespective of the dose of edrophonium administered. The purpose of this study was to determine whether a ceiling effect occurred for antagonism of an atracurium-induced neuromuscular block by edrophonium and, if so, the maximum level of block that could be antagonized by edrophonium.

Methods: In 30 adult patients, atracurium was administered to maintain a constant neuromuscular block. The level of block varied between patients. Evoked adductor pollicis twitch tension was monitored. Incremental doses of edrophonium were administered while the infusion of atracurium continued. Increments were given until adequate recovery occurred, as defined by a train-of-four (TOF) ratio greater or equal to 70%, or until no further antagonism of the block could be achieved. The probability of being able to effect adequate recovery by antagonism with edrophonium was determined using a logistic regression model. Cumulative dose-response curves were constructed using the logit transformation of the neuromuscular effect versus the logarithm of the cumulative dose of edrophonium.

Results: In 14 patients with a block of 25-77% depression of the first twitch response, antagonism by edrophonium to a TOF ratio greater or equal to 70% was possible, whereas in 16 patients with a 60-92% depression of T1, a TOF ratio > 70% was not achievable, indicating that a ceiling effect for antagonism by edrophonium occurred. A block of 67 plus/minus 3% (mean plus/minus SE) had a 50% probability of adequate antagonism. In patients in whom block was antagonized to a TOF ratio < 70%, 95% of the peak antagonistic effect occurred with an edrophonium dose of 0.8 plus/minus 0.33 mg *symbol* kg sup -1 (mean plus/minus SD).     

ANTAGONISM OF VECURONIUM AND ATRACURIUM: COMPARISON OF NEOSTIGMINE AND EDROPHONIUM ADMINISTERED AT 5% TWITCH HEIGHT RECOVERY

In 39 healthy patients antagonism, by neostig-mine 0.07 mg kg^–1or edrophonium 0.8 mg kg^–1, of neuromuscular blockadeinduced by vecuronium or atracurium, was compared. Reversalwas attempted when the height of the single twitch (TH) hadrecovered spontaneously to 5% of the control value. The evokedresponses, initially single twitch, then train-of-four (TOF)were observed until the TOF ratio was 70%. Induced recoveryfrom TH 5% to 25% was shorter following edrophonium than followingneostigmine with both vecuronium (P < 0.05) and atracurium(P < 0.05). The recovery indices and times until TH was 75%of control and until the TOF ratio was 70% were not different.The time from a TH of 75% to a TOF ratio of 70% was shorterfollowing neostigmine than following edrophonium with both vecuronium(P < 0.01) and atracurium (P < 0.01). Edrophonium hada much more variable effect on vecuronium than on atracurium.These results show that although the onset of action of edrophoniumwas faster than that of neostigmine, this did not lead to afaster clinical recovery, and antagonism by edrophonium maybe delayed in a number of patients if vecuronium is the neuromuscularblocker.     

Recovery of neuromuscular function after atracurium and pancuronium maintenance of pancuronium block

The study was undertaken to determine whether a neuromuscular blockade induced with pancuronium but maintained with atracurium was associated with a shorter time to complete recovery after administration of neostigmine than if the blockade was maintained with pancuronium alone. Anaesthesia consisted of thiopentone, N₂O/O₂/enflurane and fentanyl, and the neuromuscular blockade, induced by pancuronium 0.1 mg · kg^?1 was monitored by the force of contraction of adductor pollicis during major abdominal surgery lasting 2–5 hr. In 24 patients — Group 1 — atracurium 0.07 mg · kg^?1 was repeated when the first twitch of the train-of-four (TOF) returned to 25% of control (T₁/ TC 25). In 28 patients — Group 2 — pancuronium 0.015 mg · kg^?1 was given at similar recovery of T₁/ TC. At the end of surgery, neostigmine 0.07 mg · kg^?1 and glycopyrrolate 0.015 mg · kg^?1 were given to reverse the residual neuromuscular blockade which was indicated by a T₁/TC of less than 25% in all patients. The time from injection of the reversal drugs to a TOF ratio of 70% was similar in both groups (Group 1, 11.6 ± 7.6 min; Group 2, 10.1 ± 6 min; P = NS), but the recovery index was smaller in Group 2 (Group 1, 4 ± 2.6 min; Group 2, 2.61 ± 1.2 min; P < 0.05). Furthermore, there was no difference between groups in the duration of action of each redose. The study showed that when compared with pancuronium, equipotent doses of atracurium were not associated with (a) a shorter time to complete recovery from a neuromuscular blockade induced with pancuronium or (b) a shorter duration of action.     

Antagonism of pancuronium- and pipecuronium-induced neuromuscular block

We have compared the antagonism of neuro muscular block producedby pipecuronium with pancuronium in 80 anaesthetized surgicalpatients using mechanomyography and electromyography. Pancuronium0.1 mg kg or pipecuronium 0.07 mg kg^–1 was given afterinduction of anaesthesia and neuromuscular block was adjustedto 75% twitch depression at the time of antagonism. The followingregimens were used: edrophonium 0.5 and 1.0 mg kg^–1, neostigmine0.04 mg kg^–1 pyridostigmine 0.3 mg kg^–1 and edrophonium0.25 mg kg^–1 with pyridostigmine 0.15 mg kg^–1. Antagonismwas evaluated also by the head lift test. There was no differencebetween the reversibility of neuromuscular block produced bypancuronium or pipecuronium. Edrophonium produced a significantlyfaster antagonism than neostigmine or pyridostigmine but onsetof action was not significantly faster than that of edrophoniumwith pyridostigmine. All regimens produced 100% (or near 100%)antagonism of twitch response within 15 min. However, TOF fadeantagonism was more complete with pyridostigmine, neostigmineand edrophonium 1.0 mg kg^–1 than with edrophonium 0.5mg kg^–1. The head lift test indicated somewhat less antagonismwith edrophonium 0.5 and 1.0 mg kg^–1. Using five monitoringmethods, the rank order of reversal potency was: pyridostigmine neostigmine > edrophonium 1.0 mg kg^–1 edrophonium+ pyridostigmine > edrophonium 0.5 mg kg^–1.     

Antagonism of an intubation dose of vecuronium

To study the problem of rapid antagonization of an intubation dose of vecuronium (0.08 mg/kg), 36 surgical patients undergoing barbiturate/halothane anesthesia were given edrophonium 0.5, 0.75, and 1.0 mg/kg or neostigmine 0.04, 0.06, and 0.08 mg/kg precisely 5 min following injection of the muscle relaxant. T1 twitch (T1/Tc) and train-of-four (TOF) ratios (T4/T1) of the hypothenar muscle were monitored every 20 s with the aid of a commercially available EMG monitor (Datex-Relaxograph). As documented by T1 and T4/T1 follow-up curves (Figs. 1 and 2) and derived parameters of relaxation as well (Dur25, Dur50, Dur75, recovery index, and reversal time; Table 4), both edrophonium and neostigmine resulted in a significantly shorter duration of vecuronium blockade (P less than 0.001). The mean time for recovery of TOF ratio to above 0.7 was between 10.8 +/- 6.0 (neostigmine 0.08 mg/kg) and 21.2 +/- 7.8 (neostigmine 0.06 mg/kg) min (mean +/- SD) following injection of the antagonist as compared to 58 +/- 18.4 min in the control group (P less than 0.001). Recurarization did not occur. Differences between drugs and dose-dependent effects were minimal; edrophonium did not prove superior to neostigmine with the exception of less pronounced muscarinic side effects, hence less bradycardia and a minimum heart rate of 57 +/- 8.2 bpm 20 min after the injection of neostigmine as opposed to 72 +/- 8.2 bpm following edrophonium (P less than 0.05; Fig. 4). As to the restitution of a ventilatory force sufficient to allow spontaneous breathing, no definite conclusions can be made.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

NEOSTIGMINE AND EDROPHONIUM ANTAGONISM OF MODERATE NEUROMUSCULAR BLOCK INDUCED BY PANCURONIUM OR TUBOCURARINE

Edrophonium and neostigmine are anticholin-esterase drugs usedcommonly to antagonize competitive neuromuscular block. Althoughit has a faster onset of action than neostigmine, edrophoniumis unreliable when used to antagonize deep neuromuscular block.We have compared the antagonist characteristics of these twodrugs when used to antagonize a moderate degree of pancuronium-or tubocurarine-induced neuromuscular block. Forty ASA I orII patients undergoing surgical procedures were allocated randomlyto receive either pancuronium 70 kg^-1 or tubo-curarine 0.5 mgkg^-1, and to receive either edrophonium 0.5 mg kg^-1 or neostigmine0.05 mg kgr^-1. Antagonism was attempted when the first responseto train-of-four (TOF) stimulation recovered spontaneously to25% of the control height. Neuromuscular function was monitoredusing the evoked integrated electromyogram of the first dorsalinterosseous muscle of the hand. Adequate recovery was definedas the achievement of a TOF ratio of 0.70 or greater. Only sevenof 20 patients who received edrophonium demonstrated adequaterecovery 30 min after antagonism. Under the conditions describedin this study, edrophonium 0.5 mg kg7 was less effective asan antagonist than neostigmine 0.05 mg kg^-1. (Br. J. Anaesth.1993; 70: 160–162)     

Antagonism of pancuronium and tubocurarine blocks by edrophonium or neostigmine: a comparative study

Edrophonium 0.5 and neostigmine 0.05 mg kg-1 were compared as antagonists of pancuronium and tubocurarine-induced neuromuscular blocks, at varying degrees of recovery, in groups of 20 patients each. Adequate antagonism was defined as attaining a sustained train-of-four (TOF) ratio of 0.7 or more. Administration of edrophonium was associated with a more rapid onset of action (17 s with both relaxants with edrophonium, and 31 s and 29 s with neostigmine with pancuronium and tubocurarine, respectively), and a shorter time to attain a TOF ratio of 0.7 (74 s and 48 s with edrophonium and 230 s and 293 s with neostigmine for pancuronium and tubocurarine blocks, respectively). However, whereas neostigmine administration provided adequate antagonism in all 20 patients given pancuronium and in 19 out of 20 patients given tubocurarine, edrophonium failed to achieve adequate antagonism in six patients after pancuronium and eight patients after tubocurarine. The majority of these patients had shown three or less responses to a TOF stimulation prior to antagonism. Two separate groups of 10 patients each with relatively deeper pancuronium or tubocurarine blocks (three or less responses to TOF stimulation) were given edrophonium in a dose of 1.0 mg kg-1. However, adequate antagonism even with this dose of edrophonium was attained in only two out of 10 patients given pancuronium and in five out of 10 patients given tubocurarine. It is concluded that edrophonium is unreliable for antagonism of relatively deep blocks by pancuronium or tubocurarine and that neostigmine is the preferred and more reliable antagonist.     

Train-of-Four recovery after pharmacologic antagonism of pancuronium-, pipecuronium-, and doxacurium-induced neuromuscular block in anaesthetized humans

Previous studies have suggested that the increased duration of action of long-acting neuromuscular relaxants may make their pharmacologic antagonism more difficult and, thus, increase the likelihood of residual block. This hypothesis was tested in healthy, adult humans who received a background of isoflurane/N₂O/fentanyl anaesthesia.
Study subjects were paralyzed with either pancuronium (N=8), pipecuronium (N=8), or the longer-acting relaxant, doxacurium (N=8). Neuromuscular function was monitored, and, using a blinded, randomized study design, the relaxants were titrated to identify the ED₉₅ dose in each patient. Thereafter, spontaneous recovery was observed until there was 25% ofbaseline response to the first supramaximal twitch (Tl) in a train-of-four (TOF). At this time, the block was antagonized with neostigmine 0.07 mg/kg and glycopyrrolate 0.014 mg/kg i.v., and recovery of TOF was recorded.
Spontaneous recovery to 25% of the baseline Tl response occurred at 52± 14 min (mean±SD) following administration of either pancuronium and pipecuronium, and 85 ±33 min following doxacurium ( P <0.05 for doxacurium versus pancuronium and pipecuronium). In doxacurium-rreated patients, reversal of block with neostigmine was less predictable and less complete than with the other two relaxants. For example, the ratio of the fourth to first twitch (T4/T1) of the TOF at 10 and 15 min after reversal was significantly less with doxacurium (59 ±14% and 61±16%, respectively) than with either pancuronium (75±6% and 75±10%) or pipecuronium (76±9% for both). At 30 min post-neostigmine, the incidence of residual block (i.e. T4/T1 <0.70) was: pancuronium 2 patients, pipecuronium 1 patient, and doxacurium 5 patients.
These studies support the hypothesis that incomplete reversal of neuromuscular block is more likely with longer-acting neuromuscular relaxants.