Pancreatic Biopsy: Why? When? How?

For final diagnosis of pancreatic cancer histologic or cytologic confirmation is needed. Tissue or cell material can be achieved by percutaneous puncture as part of the preoperative workup. During operation core-needle, incisional, and wedge biopsies or fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) can be chosen. Sensitivity and diagnostic accuracy are high for both histologic and cytologic examinations, and false-positive results are exceptional, giving a specificity of 100% in most published series. The complication rate is low, also for knife biopsies in recent reports, provided biopsy of seemingly normal tissue is avoided. Percutaneous puncture is currently restricted to patients found to have advanced disease and who are not candidates for laparotomy. Microscopic confirmation is required in all patients in whom chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or both are planned. However, for attempted radical surgery per se, biopsy is not mandatory if the clinical suspicion of cancer is high and the surgical team has documented low postoperative mortality and morbidity rates.     

CT colonography: Why? When? How?

Although optical colonoscopy is still the gold standard for diseases of the colon, radiologic examination of the colon is now being performed by CT scan. Evaluation of the colon is enhanced by distension, which "de-folds" the intestinal wall, thus facilitating its examination for abnormalities of the mucosa, the wall as a whole, and the diameter of the bowel lumen. Water or gas (CO(2)) may be used for the distension, depending on the suspected lesions. The water enema method of colonography combines filling the bowel lumen with water and intravenous injection of a contrast medium. It is indicated when there is a clinical suspicion of colon cancer, or for initial discovery of liver metastases, and for staging of colon tumors. This technique, which requires little or no colon cleansing preparation, can be performed with no special equipment and has a short learning curve. The gas enema method of colonography, or virtual colonoscopy, is performed by distending the colon with CO(2), without any intravenous injection of contrast medium. Its purpose is to detect polyps as part of a screening for precancerous growths. This technique, which does require bowel cleansing preparation, uses a dedicated console for reading and requires specific training.     

Fetal skeletal computed tomography: When? How? Why?

PurposeTo study the additional role of fetal skeletal computed tomography in suspected prenatal bone abnormalities.Materials and methodsTwo centers included in a retrospective study all fetuses who benefited from skeletal computed tomography for a suspected constitutional bone disease or focal dysostosis.ResultsA total of 198 patients were included. CT was performed in 112 patients (56%) for an isolated short femur below the third percentile (group A), in 15 patients (8%) for bowed or fractured femur (group B), in 23 patients (12%) for biometric discrepancy between a short femur and increased head circumference (group C) and in 48 patients (24%) for suspected focal dysostosis (group D). CT was interpreted as normal in 126 cases (64%), i.e. 87% in group A, 0% in group B, 65% in group C and 25% in group D. When including only cases with postnatal or postmortem clinical and/or radiological confirmation was available, CT provided additional and/or more accurate information than ultrasound in 20% of cases in group A, 66% in group B, 30% in group C and 72% in group D. Sixty-seven percent of patients in whom CT was interpreted as normal were lost to follow-up.ConclusionIn isolated short femur, fetal skeletal CT is normal in the great majority of cases although protocolized follow-up of these babies is absolutely compulsory, as a large proportion is lost to follow-up. Fetal skeletal CT can confirm or improve imaging for the suspected diagnosis in suspected focal dysostosis or constitutional bone disease.     

What can we learn from large data sets? An analysis of 19,000 retropubic tapes

Introduction and hypothesis

Retropubic tapes are successful for treating stress urinary incontinence (SUI), but there is controversy around risk profiles. The British Society of Urogynaecology (BSUG) database allows analysis of surgery for patient safety, surveillance and benchmarking. Objectives of this study were to establish success and complication rates in routine practice, determine complication rates for trainees and consultants, explore reasons for outliers and assess perforation as a surrogacy of quality.

Methods

Approval was obtained from BSUG to use data on retropubic tapes. Data was anonymised, and patients gave prior consent. Analysis was done using the χ² test, and a funnel plot of bladder perforation rate was calculated.

Results

There were 18,763 procedures recorded: 14,156 were performed by consultants, 64 by associate specialists (64), 1140 by subspecialty trainees, 2549 by registrars, 201 staff grades and 377 other. We found a 3.5 % bladder perforation rate, which was statistically higher for trainees than consultants (p?<?0.05). The rate of other “standard” complications were low: 95.8 % of patients felt better on the Patient Global Impression of Improvement of Incontinence (PGI) scale. There was a significant difference (p?<?0.05) in PGI and SUI outcome between patients who did and did not experience perforation.

Conclusions

Success rates with retropubic tapes are high, with low complication rates. Bladder perforation in “real”, not “trial” data was 3.5 %, which is lower than reported by the Cochrane review (4.5 %). Trainees have a higher perforation rate (p?<?0.05) because of learning curves. Outliers are easily identified, and reasons for this should be explored, including proportion of trainees doing the surgery. This analysis confirms that bladder perforation is a valid surrogate for quality with a small but measurable difference. We have a responsibility to analyse data to improve patient care and encourage colleagues to support the International Urogynaecology Association (IUGA) database initiative.

     

Hyperhidrosis: What is it and Why Does it Occur?

Hyperhidrosis is excessive sweating in response to heat or emotional stimuli beyond physiologic need. The ailment is not new and has been described in the literature dating back several centuries. It can be classified as either primary or secondary based on its etiology. Mechanisms that cause excessive sweating can be traced to the sympathetic nervous system, part of the autonomic nervous system. It has been speculated that the primary abnormality is central, and that the hypothalamic sweat center that controls the palms, axillae, and soles is distinct in hyperhidrosis individuals.     

What Are The Complex Operations and Why?

Introduction  

Surgeons are often judged by their ability to perform complex surgical procedures.     

Cortical Bone Porosity: What Is It,Why Is It Important,and How Can We Detect It?

There is growing recognition of the role of micro-architecture in osteoporotic bone loss and fragility. This trend has been driven by advances in imaging technology, which have enabled a transition from measures of mass to micro-architecture. Imaging trabecular bone has been a key research focus, but advances in resolution have also enabled the detection of cortical bone micro-architecture, particularly the network of vascular canals, commonly referred to as ‘cortical porosity.’ This review aims to provide an overview of what this level of porosity is, why it is important, and how it can be characterized by imaging. Moving beyond a ‘trabeculocentric’ view of bone loss holds the potential to improve diagnosis and monitoring of interventions. Furthermore, cortical porosity is intimately linked to the remodeling process, which underpins bone loss, and thus a larger potential exists to improve our fundamental understanding of bone health through imaging of both humans and animal models.