Management of hepatitis C virus infection recurrence after liver transplantation: an overview

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is the major indication for liver transplantation worldwide. Its recurrence is virtually universal. Once reinfection is established, progression to cirrhosis occurs in 25%-30% of recipients within 5 years. Several studies have attempted to identify the ideal antiviral treatment for liver transplant recipients. At present, the management of recurrent HCV infection in liver transplant recipients is based on widely accepted indications, which represent a reliable guide to identify the “ideal” candidate for therapy, when therapy should be started, and what is to be expected in terms of side effects and response to treatment.     

Ribavirin therapy for hepatitis C infection following liver transplantation

Hepatitis C infection following orthotopic liver transplantation may lead to progressive chronic graft dysfunction. In this study, seven liver transplant recipients with chronic allograft dysfunction due to hepatitis C infection (one acquired and six recurrent infections) were treated with oral ribavirin for 6 months. Symptoms of lethargy, nausea and anorexia improved in all patients within 2 weeks of starting the drug, with a fall in serum AST of at least 40% by this time. Ribavirin-induced haemolysis was clinically significant in three patients, necessitating a reduction in the daily dose of ribavirin from 1.2 g to 0.2 g. Comparison of the pre- and post-treatment biopsy specimens in the four patients who tolerated the full dose of ribavirin and who had normal AST levels at the end of 6 months of treatment showed significant histological improvement with reduction in either lobular or periportal inflammation in all of the patients and a reduction in periportal fibrosis in one patient. HCV RNA remained detectable in serum in all of the patients at the end of the study.     

Effectiveness of early a-interferon therapy for hepatitis C virus infection recurrence after liver transplantation

Abstract  The results in this short series show that early and prolonged α-interferon therapy for hepatitis C virus recurrence after liver transplantation could bring some benefit to the infected liver grafts. The risk of graft rejection was clearly minimised by maintaining immunosup-pression at normal levels.     

Antiviral therapy for recurrent hepatitis C reduces recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma following liver transplantation

Recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the major concerns following liver transplantation (LT). With the potential antitumor properties of interferon (IFN), their role in prevention of HCC recurrence is to be defined. We retrospectively reviewed 46 patients who underwent LT for hepatitis C virus (HCV)‐related HCC between January 2004 and December 2008. Twenty‐four (52.2%) patients with biopsy‐proven HCV recurrence received antiviral therapy (IFN group); their outcomes were compared with 22 patients (control group). There was no significant difference for tumor size, number, and type of neo‐adjuvant therapy between the two groups. The 1‐ and 3‐year overall patient survival (100% vs. 90.9% and 87.3% vs. 71.8%; P = 0.150) and tumor‐free survival (100% vs. 72.7% and 83.1% vs. 67.5%; P = 0.214) between IFN and control group were comparable. HCC recurrence was the most common cause of death (n = 6 of 12, 50%), all in the control group. During follow‐up, seven (15.2%) patients developed HCC recurrence: one (4.1%) in the IFN group and six (27.3%) in the control group (P < 0.05). In conclusions, HCC recurrence rate and related deaths were significantly lower in patients that received post‐transplant antiviral therapy for recurrent HCV.     

肝移植术后丙型肝炎病毒的再感染与丙肝复发

丙肝肝炎后肝移植病人均伴随不同程度的丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)复发,其发病机制因疾病的不同阶段而不同.影响复发的因素包括HCV基因型、病毒载量、供体和受体HLA匹配情况、复发的时间、供体的年龄等,而免疫抑制剂的使用是最重要的影响因素.治疗的效果通过持续病毒学应答来评价.目前认为聚二乙醇干扰素联合利巴韦林是治疗慢性丙型肝炎最好的选择和最佳的治疗方案.     

Antiviral treatment for hepatitis B virus recurrence following liver transplantation

The purpose of this study was to identify the factors associated with the recurrence of hepatitis B virus (HBV) following liver transplantation (LT) for HBV‐related disease and to recognize the outcome of treatment for HBV recurrence with oral nucleos(t)ide analogues. Six hundred and sixty‐seven LTs were performed for HBsAg‐positive adult patients in our institute from 1996 to 2010. HBV prophylaxis was performed by hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) monotherapy or HBIG and entecavir combination therapy. There were 63 cases (11.4%) of HBV recurrences during a median follow‐up of 51 months. The median time to HBV recurrence was 22 months. A preoperative HBV DNA load of more than 10⁵ IU/mL, HBIG monotherapy, and hepatocellular carcinoma in the explant liver were independent risk factors for HBV recurrence following LT in multivariate analysis. Patient survival at 10 yr was 54.2% for HBV‐recurrent patients. Among patients with HBV recurrence, HBsAg seroclearance was achieved in 13 patients (20.6%), but HBsAg seroclearance did not affect survival in these patients after the recurrence of HBV (p = 0.28). The recurrence of HBV led to graft failure in six cases. HBV recurrence should be prevented by strict management of pre‐transplant HBV viremia and an effective post‐transplant HBV prophylaxis.     

Management of hepatitis C virus infection in liver transplantation with adacolumn apheresis

Recurrent hepatitis C virus (HCV) is a major cause of liver transplant loss, hepatic failure, and retransplantation need. Posttransplantation antiviral therapy in patients with evidence of recurrent disease is the mainstay of management. Although HCV is a hepatocellular pathogen, there is increasing evidence that the virus can infect and persist in other cells. In particular, granulocytes and monocytes/macrophages are known to constitute extrahepatic sites for HCV replication and dissemination. The aim of this study was to apply Adacolumn apheresis as a possible therapeutic alternative to conventional drug therapy to manage HCV infections. Seven patients who underwent liver transplantation for HCV-related cirrhosis were eligible for the study. The patients underwent 5 1-hour sessions for 5 consecutive days. The first treatment was performed in the anhepatic phase of liver transplantation with the intent to early reduce infected granulocytes and monocytes/macrophages. The patients were evaluated over the 5 days after inclusion with 3- and 6-months follow-ups. Early apheresis treatments in the anhepatic phase and over the following 4 days after transplantation produced low viral loads in 4 patients, negative viral loads in 2 patients, and increased viremia in 1 patient. At follow-up, the viremia load was stable in 6 patients without increased transaminase levels. At the end of the treatment cycle, almost all immune cells of the 6 patients maintained CD4+/CD8+ T-cell ratios. The optimal timing of treatment initiation is unknown, but early preemptive therapy is recommended to decrease the risk for recurrent infection. Although this study investigated the responses among a small number of patients, it documented that the Adacolumn changed cellular immunity, promoting early virologic responses.     

Management of hepatitis C virus infection in the setting of liver transplantation.

1. Posttransplantation recurrence of hepatitis C virus infection is a universal phenomenon with a highly variable natural history. 2. Approximately 10% to 25% of hepatitis C virus- infected recipients of liver allografts will develop cirrhosis within 5 years' after transplantation. 3. The 1-year actuarial risk of hepatic decompensation after recurrence of cirrhosis approximates 42%. 4. Some of the factors associated with aggressive recurrence include donor and recipient age, recent year of transplantation, recipient gender and race, the use of antithymocyte globulin, and high dose of corticosteroids. 5. Highly aggressive recurrent hepatitis C virus infection leading to cirrhosis fares poorly after retransplantation in the presence of hyperbilirubinemia and renal failure, with a 1-year survival of approximately 40%. 6. Elevated serum aminotransferases are a poor indicator or recurrent disease. 7. Current sustained virological response after combination pegylated alpha interferon and ribavirin treatment is approximately 25%. 8. There is no consensus on initiation time point, duration of treatment, or dosage. Given immunosuppression, at least 48 weeks of therapy is a reasonable approach. 9. Treatment for 48 weeks is cost effective. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for men aged 55 years is $29,100 per life-year saved.     

Effect of nonviral factors on hepatitis C recurrence after liver transplantation

OBJECTIVE: Hepatitis C (HCV) is now the most common indication for orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). While graft reinfection remains universal, progression to graft cirrhosis is highly variable. This study examined donor, recipient, and operative variables to identify factors that affect recurrence of HCV post-OLT to facilitate graft-recipient matching. METHODS: Retrospective review of 307 patients who underwent OLT for HCV over a 10-year period at our center. Recurrence of HCV was identified by the presence of biochemical graft dysfunction and concurrent liver biopsy showing diagnostic pathologic features. Time to recurrence was the endpoint for statistical analysis. Five donor, 6 recipient, and 2 operative variables that may affect recurrence were analyzed by univariate comparison and Cox proportional hazard regression models. RESULTS: Recurrence-free survival in the 307 study patients was 69% and 34% at 1 and 5 years, respectively. Four predictive variables related to either donor or recipient characteristics were identified. Advanced donor age, prolonged donor hospitalization, increasing recipient age, and elevated recipient MELD scores were found to increase the relative risk of HCV recurrence. Examination of HLA disparity between donors and recipients demonstrated no correlation between class I or class II mismatches and recurrence-free survival. CONCLUSIONS: We have identified donor and recipient characteristics that significantly predict hepatitis C recurrence following liver transplantation. These factors are identifiable before transplant and, if considered when matching donors to HCV recipients, may decrease the incidence of HCV recurrence after OLT. A change in the current national liver allocation system would be needed to realize the full value of this benefit.     

肝移植后乙型肝炎的复发和防治

目的 探讨乙型肝炎所致肝硬变患者施行原位肝移植后乙型肝炎复发的影响因素、临床诊断和治疗方案。方法 ２例乙型肝炎后肝硬变晚期患者在原位肝移植前后接受了基本相同的抗乙型肝炎病毒（ＨＢＶ）治疗。结果 １例术前乙型肝炎病毒表面抗原（ＨＢｓＡｇ）、ｅ抗原（ＨＢｅＡｇ）和ＨＢＶ ＤＮＡ均阳性的患者,术后２个月时乙型肝炎复发,死于乙型肝炎复发所致的肝、肾功能衰竭;另１例仅ＨＢｓＡｇ和ＨＢｅＡｇ阳性的患者术后已存     

肝移植术后乙型肝炎复发2例临床分析

拉米夫定联合乙型肝炎高效价免疫球蛋白(hepatitis b immunoglobulin,hbig)可有效预防原位肝移植术后乙型肝炎复发.然而,移植后核苷(酸)类药物使用不规范及疗程的不确切性给广大医务人员及患者带来诸多困扰.本文介绍2例乙型肝炎相关性终末期肝病患者行原位肝移植术后坚持拉米夫定治疗6年出现乙型肝炎复发的病例,为预防肝移植术后乙型肝炎复发及核苷(酸)类药物使用疗程提供借鉴.     

Prognostic factors for hepatitis C recurrence in patients undergoing orthotopic liver transplantation

End-stage liver disease caused by the hepatitis C virus (HCV) is a major indication for liver transplantation. HCV re-infection after LT is constant, and it significantly impairs patient and graft survival. Factors that may influence histological recurrence in the graft remain unclear. The aim of our study is to analyse the factors that influence the histological recurrence of HCV in a series of 142 patients undergoing orthotopic liver transplantation. In this series, donors age until 1995 were mostly younger than 30 years, however, from 2000 onwards most of the cases had graft implants from elderly donors. Histological recurrence was 92% after a mean follow-up of 60 months (12-120 months), 17% of which had poor-prognostic recurrence. Half of the patients presenting with recurrence did so in the first six months and more than two thirds developing hepatitis in the graft did so in the first year. The accumulated probability of histological recurrence is 40.1%, 51.5%, 70.3%, 83.5% and 92% at 6, 12, 24, 36 and 60 months respectively. In our experience, the variables associated with the development of histological recurrence in the graft, in the multivariate analysis, are donors age > or =31 years and immunosuppressive treatment without mycophenolate mophetil (MMF). Treatment with MMF still acts as a protection factor and is associated with histological non-recurrence.     

Transfusion has no effect on recurrence in hepatitis C after liver transplantation

Background: The literature suggests that blood product transfusions have a negative impact on the survival of liver transplant patients. We investigated the impact of intraoperative blood product usage on the survival of liver transplantation patients being transplanted for hepatitis C‐related end‐stage liver disease. In addition, we analyzed a potentially more sensitive metric, namely disease recurrence and fibrosis progression, obtained from follow‐up liver biopsies. Methods: We retrospectively studied 194 consecutive patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) undergoing liver transplantation. To investigate the effect of red blood cell (RBC) or platelet transfusions on post‐transplant HCV recurrence, hepatic biopsy data from 4 months and 1 year after transplantation were studied. In addition, survival data were analyzed. Results: There was no effect of intraoperative RBC or platelet transfusion on either 1‐ or 5‐year patient survival following liver transplantation. There was no difference in HCV disease recurrence or progression of hepatic fibrosis at 4 months or 1 year attributable either to RBC or to platelet transfusion. Conclusion: This study was not able to confirm an effect on the survival of HCV‐infected liver transplant patients related to intraoperative transfusion of RBCs or platelets. In addition, these transfusions had no effect on HCV recurrence or fibrosis progression. This is not to condone a liberal transfusion practice, but rather to reassure that when clinically indicated, transfusion does not have a significant impact on patient survival or disease recurrence in HCV‐infected liver transplant patients.     

De novo cryptogenic hepatitis after sustained eradication of hepatitis C following liver transplantation

Patients with recurrent hepatitis C (HCV) after liver transplantation (OLT) are often treated with interferon and ribavirin in an attempt to eradicate HCV and prevent cirrhosis. We report four patients who developed de novo cryptogenic hepatitis following sustained eradication of recurrent HCV, which led to decompensated liver disease in two patients, both of whom required listing for retransplantation. Between September 2000 and October 2001, 38 consecutive patients with recurrent HCV were treated with interferon alpha 2b and ribavirin, of whom eight patients (21%) developed a sustained response to HCV eradication. Four of these patients developed cryptogenic hepatitis, which led to decompensated cirrhosis in two patients. Both patients were listed for retransplantation but died on the waiting list. No etiology for liver disease was identified despite extensive investigations in all four patients including postmortem analysis in the two patients. We hypothesize that these individuals developed an aberrant immune response leading to allograft injury whose severity may be determined by underlying haplotype, degree of immunosuppression, presence/absence of HCV, and duration of treatment. We have not found any similar reports in the literature but anticipate more cases to be reported given the universal use of antiviral therapy for recurrent HCV.     

Antiviral therapy for hepatitis C virus recurrence following liver transplantation: long-term results from a single center experience

BACKGROUND: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) reinfection after liver transplantation is a virtually constant finding and leads to chronic hepatitis and cirrhosis in variable proportions. This study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of alpha-interferon (IFN) plus ribavirin for recurrent HCV following liver transplantation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty of 55 patients (54.5%) with histologically proven HCV recurrence after liver transplantation were given antiviral therapy (alpha-IFN at a dose of 6 MU x 3 x week IM associated with oral ribavirin 1 g/d for 12 months) and followed up for a further 12 months after the end of the treatment. Liver and renal function tests, hemocytometric values, and HCV-RNA were assessed every 3 months throughout the therapy and follow-up. Liver biopsy was performed before and after the treatment and after another 12 months of follow-up. RESULTS: Eight patients (26.7%) were withdrawn from the treatment due to adverse events and another 8 (26.7%) needed a dosage reduction. Eleven patients (36.7%) had a biochemical and virological response, becoming aminotransferase and HCV-RNA negative at the end of the treatment; 6 patients (20%) still had a sustained response after 12 months of follow-up. All 6 patients are clinically stable at 6 years after completing the antiviral therapy. A low viral load before therapy was a positive predictor of sustained response. No histologically significant improvement was seen at the end of the therapy or after the follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of alpha-IFN plus ribavirin induced a sustained virologic response in 20% of liver transplant recipients with recurrent HCV, but intolerance of the therapy prompted its discontinuation or a dosage reduction in a large proportion of patients. However, we have observed a long-term efficacy of the antiviral therapy in the sustained responders.