Evaluation of a screening program for diabetic retinopathy in a primary care setting Dodia (Dépistage ophtalmologique du diabète) study

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this observational study was to evaluate the screening for diabetic retinopathy (DR) using eye fundus photography taken by a nonmydriatic camera and transmitted trough the Internet to an ophthalmological reading centre, as compared to a dilated eye examination performed by an ophthalmologist. METHODS: A total of 456 and 426 diabetic patients were included by two different groups of primary care physicians (PCPs), 358 being screened with the non-mydriatic camera (experimental group) and 320 with dilated eye fundus exam (control group). RESULTS: The proportion of screened patients for whom PCPs received a screening report within the 6-month follow-up period was 74,1% for the experimental group and 71,5% for the control group. Screening for DR was negative in 77,6% of patients with eye fundus photographs vs 89,6% with dilated eye examination. DR was diagnosed in 62 patients (17,3%) with eye fundus photographs versus 31 with dilated eye examination (10,4%). Referral to an ophthalmologist was required in 59 reports of patients with photographs (16.5%), 23 of them due to high grade DR. Finally, the non-mydriatic camera was found of little inconvenience by patients. CONCLUSION: The telemedical approach to DR screening proved to be effective in providing primary care practitioners with information about their patient's eye status. This screening method allowed to identify patients requiring prompt referral to the ophthalmologist for further complete eye examination. In conclusion, this study provided successful results of DR screening using fundus photography in primary care patients, and strongly supports the need to further extend this screening program in a larger number of French sites.     

OPHDIAT: a telemedical network screening system for diabetic retinopathy in the Ile-de-France

OBJECTIVE: International and national guidelines recommend an annual funduscopic examination for all diabetic patients, but such annual fundus examinations are not sufficiently performed in France. Non-mydriatic fundus photography is a valid method of evaluation for diabetic retinopathy (DR) and a viable alternative to ophthalmoscopy. After two pilot studies demonstrated the feasibility of telemedical screening for diabetic retinopathy in both hospital and primary-care settings, we developed a regional telemedical network, OPHDIAT, designed to facilitate access to regular annual evaluations of patients with diabetes while saving medical time. MATERIALS AND METHODS: OPHDIAT comprises peripheral screening centres equipped with non-mydriatic cameras, where fundus photographs are taken by technicians linked by telemedicine to a reference centre, where ophthalmologists grade the images. Currently in the Ile-de-France region, 16 screening centres are linked through a central server to an ophthalmologic reading centre and includes 11 centres located in the diabetes departments of 11 hospitals, one diabetic retinopathy screening centre located in northern Paris, three in healthcare centres and one in a prison. RESULTS: During the 28-month evaluation period, 15,307 DR screening examinations were performed. Retinal photographs of at least one eye could not be graded in 1332 patients (9.7%) and diabetic retinopathy was detected in 3350 patients (23.4%). After the screening examination, 3478 patients (25.2%) were referred to an ophthalmologist for either DR, cataract and/or non-gradable photographs. CONCLUSION: Fundus photography combined with telemedicine has the potential to improve the regular annual evaluation for diabetic retinopathy. The organization of the network around a central reading centre serves to guarantee quality control.     

DrishtiCare: a telescreening platform for diabetic retinopathy powered with fundus image analysis

Objective:

Diabetic retinopathy is the leading cause of blindness in urban populations. Early diagnosis through regular screening and timely treatment has been shown to prevent visual loss and blindness. It is very difficult to cater to this vast set of diabetes patients, primarily because of high costs in reaching out to patients and a scarcity of skilled personnel. Telescreening offers a cost-effective solution to reach out to patients but is still inadequate due to an insufficient number of experts who serve the diabetes population. Developments toward fundus image analysis have shown promise in addressing the scarcity of skilled personnel for large-scale screening. This article aims at addressing the underlying issues in traditional telescreening to develop a solution that leverages the developments carried out in fundus image analysis.

Method

We propose a novel Web-based telescreening solution (called DrishtiCare) integrating various value-added fundus image analysis components. A Web-based platform on the software as a service (SaaS) delivery model is chosen to make the service cost-effective, easy to use, and scalable. A server-based prescreening system is employed to scrutinize the fundus images of patients and to refer them to the experts. An automatic quality assessment module ensures transfer of fundus images that meet grading standards. An easy-to-use interface, enabled with new visualization features, is designed for case examination by experts.

Results

Three local primary eye hospitals have participated and used DrishtiCare’s telescreening service. A preliminary evaluation of the proposed platform is performed on a set of 119 patients, of which 23% are identified with the sight-threatening retinopathy. Currently, evaluation at a larger scale is under process, and a total of 450 patients have been enrolled.

Conclusion:

The proposed approach provides an innovative way of integrating automated fundus image analysis in the telescreening framework to address well-known challenges in large-scale disease screening. It offers a low-cost, effective, and easily adoptable screening solution to primary care providers.     

Retinopathy Screening in Type 2 Diabetes: Reliability of Wide Angle Fundus Photography

The purpose of the study was to assess the reliability of mydriatic 60° fundus photography in a retinopathy screening programme for Type 2 diabetic patients in a primary health care setting. In 323 eligible consecutive Type 2 diabetic patients above 40 years of age, attending a regional shared care diabetes project, mydriatic wide angle fundus photography was compared with standardized fundoscopy in dilated pupils as the recommended test for the detection of diabetic retinopathy. Fundus photography included two black and white transparencies per eye visualizing the central and nasal retinal field. Fundoscopy findings and pictures were scored according to modified Wisconsin criteria. Fundoscopy revealed in 95/646 eyes (14.7 %) some degree of diabetic retinopathy. Sensitivity and specificity of fundus photography (omitting ungradable transparencies) were 97 % for the diagnosis of any diabetic retinopathy (DRP). All patients with moderate and severe DRP (Wisconsin grade 3 and worse) according to fundoscopy were detected by fundus photography. In conclusion, mydriatic wide angle 60° fundus photography, making two pictures per eye, can be applied effectively and reliably in the detection of diabetic retinopathy in patients with Type 2 diabetes.     

Benefits of Ophdiat, a telemedical network to screen for diabetic retinopathy: A retrospective study in five reference hospital centres

AimOne objective of Ophdiat^®, a telemedical network using digital non-mydriatic cameras in Île-de-France, is to develop a comprehensive screening programme that provides access to annual fundus examinations to all diabetic patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the benefits of this programme in a hospital setting.MethodsA retrospective analysis of 500 case reports of diabetic patients hospitalized before and after Ophdiat^® setup was performed in five reference hospital centres. At each centre, 100 case reports (50 before, 50 after) of patients aged greater than 18 years, hospitalized for their annual check-up, with no known diabetic retinopathy (DR) before hospitalization and with the last fundus examination performed greater than 11 months previously, were randomly selected. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients whose fundus examinations were performed during hospitalization; secondary endpoints were the number of cases of DR found and the time taken by ophthalmologists to make the diagnosis.ResultsThe mean proportion of patients with fundus examinations was 50.4% and 72.4% before and after, respectively, Ophdiat^® (P < 0.01). The prevalence of DR was 11.1% before and 12.7% after (not significant). The mean time taken by an ophthalmologist per diagnosis of DR was 0.90 half-day before and 0.32 half-day after Ophdiat^®.ConclusionThis evaluation shows that Ophdiat^®, combined with the availability of modern and effective devices, has improved DR screening in diabetology departments in hospitals. Additional human resources would certainly ensure more effective use of the system.     

Associations with Retinopathy in Type 2 Diabetes: a Population-based Study in a Swedish Rural Area

This population-based study was carried out in a rural area in Sweden. The impact of duration of diabetes, metabolic control, albuminuria, and mode of detection (screening or presence of overt symptoms at the time of diagnosis) on retinopathy in patients with type 2 diabetes aged under 70 years was investigated at a primary health care centre. Ninety-nine percent of all known persons with Type 2 diabetes were under care at the centre. The fundi were examined in all but one of those under 70 years, and a 100% attendance rate was noted with regard to other variables such as albuminuria, glycated haemoglobin, and blood lipids. A team approach (general practitioner, nurse specialist, dietitian, and chiropodist) with patient education as an integral part of the treatment has been practised for the past 15 years. Retinopathy was associated with duration of disease, glycaemic control, systolic blood pressure, detection by overt symptoms, and albuminuria. The risk of retinopathy was not associated with smoking or treatment category. The prevalence of retinopathy was 26.5% in the whole population, and 18.8% among the patients who had been treated for their diabetes at the centre from the time of diagnosis. The importance of an appropriate organization in primary health care for early case finding, near-normal glycaemia, team approach, and structured collaboration with a department of ophthalmology is emphasized in order to realize the aims of the St Vincent declaration to reduce eye complications due to Type 2 diabetes.     

Screening coverage for diabetic retinopathy using a three-field digital non-mydriatic fundus camera

AIMS: Guidelines for regular screening of diabetic retinopathy (DR) have been published in the Spanish and European literature since 1992, but screening for DR is still in its early stages in Spain. The aim of this paper is to estimate the prevalence of screening coverage for DR and prevalence of DR itself using three-field digital non-mydriatic fundus photography to determine whether these guidelines had been implemented. METHODS: Data on age, gender, diabetes and previous eye examinations were recorded on a specially designed questionnaire. Three 45 degrees digital images per eye were taken using a three-field digital non-mydriatic fundus camera with two photographic procedures (both eyes versus the eye with the poorer visual acuity). RESULTS: A total of 183 patients with diabetes participated. The median age and duration of diabetes was 63 years and 10 years, respectively. Only six patients (3.3%) could not be completely graded. Screening coverage for DR was 38.5% in patients with type 2 diabetes and a duration less than 5 years versus those with longer diabetes duration (P=0.007); 20.5% of these patients had DR. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the need for heightened awareness of the importance of screening for retinopathy in people with type 2 diabetes and duration of diabetes under 5 years.     

Efficacy and reliability of fundus digital camera as a screening tool for diabetic retinopathy in Kuwait

OBJECTIVE: Many screening and follow-up methods are available for detecting diabetic retinopathy (DR). However, once patients develop retinopathy, it is unclear as to what method should be used for their review. This study is designed to assess the correlation between fundus digital image and clinical examination and to develop a screening program for the early detection of sight-threatening DR using a Canon CF 60 UV fundus camera. METHODS: Patients who were not treated for DR earlier were enrolled in the study. All patients underwent digital fundus photography. The photographs were evaluated and compared with the clinical findings as recorded by retinal specialists. DR and macular edema were analyzed separately, and the correlation was statistically measured. The kappa statistic was used to estimate the extent of the agreement between the two procedures. RESULTS: A total of 92 eyes of 51 patients were eligible to be entered in the study. Comparison of the digital image of the fundus and the examination by an ophthalmologist showed a good correlation. The kappa score for retinopathy was estimated to be 93% with 95.6% concordance. The kappa score for diabetic maculopathy was 88% with concordance of 92.2%. CONCLUSION: We conclude that digital images provide an efficient method for diagnosing and classifying sight-threatening DR, particularly proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). However, agreement between the digital fundus camera and clinical examination by an ophthalmologist for diabetic maculopathy detection, though substantial statistically, was not very satisfactory. It was also felt that the digital photographs can be used as a tool for teleophthalmology and can be integrated as a screening system in Kuwait.     

Screening for diabetic retinopathy: the first telemedical approach in a primary care setting in France

OBJECTIVES: Diabetic retinopathy (DR) remains a major cause of visual impairment in France, due to insufficient regular annual screening. Fundus photography is a sensitive alternative to ophthalmoscopy for DR screening. The aim of our study was to report the first telemedical approach to this screening in a primary care setting in France. METHODS: A DR screening centre equipped with a nonmydriatic camera was opened in the 18th district of northern Paris and placed at the disposal of general practitioners (GPs) of the Réseau de Santé Paris Nord (North Paris Health Network). These GPs were invited to send their diabetic patients who had no known DR and had had no fundus examination for more than one year to this screening center. Retinal photographs were taken by an orthoptist without pupillary dilation and sent for grading through the Internet to the Lariboisière Hopital Ophthalmology Department. RESULTS: During an 18-month period, 912 DR screening examinations were performed in 868 diabetic patients referred to the DR screening center by 240 GPs. Patients' mean +/- SD age was 59.9 +/- 11.1 years. Of these 868 patients, 260 (30%) said they never have had an ophthalmological examination. Diabetic retinopathy was detected in 197 patients (22.7%). The proportion of patients for whom fundus photographs of one or both eyes could not be assessed was 10.1%. 159 patients (18.3%) required referral to an ophthalmologist. CONCLUSION: Nonmydriatic photography, combined with teletransmission to a reading centre, proved to be a feasible valid method for the detection of DR. This screening method allowed the identification of patients requiring prompt referral to an ophthalmologist for further complete eye examination.     

Comparison of quantitative coronary arteriography using cinefilm and digital images

OBJECTIVES: Quantitative coronary arteriography using both analog data (cinefilm) and digital data was evaluated with a stenotic vessel phantom and clinical data. METHODS: A stenotic vessel phantom using contrast medium with diameters of 2, 3, 4 and 6 mm was imaged using an X-ray image intensifier. Quantitative coronary arteriography was performed to measure reference and stenosis diameters in the phantom and under clinical conditions to measure coronary artery diameters using cinefilm and digital images. RESULTS: Both cinefilm and digital images were distorted at the peripheral image area, so errors were caused when the reference and stenosis were not in the same area. Measurements of diameters in the horizontal direction were larger than in the vertical and diagonal directions (p < 0.05). Reference diameters measured on digital images were larger than those on analog images (p < 0.0001). The difference in the real and measured reference diameter (2 and 3 mm) was less than 1% on digital images. The mean error in measurement of stenotic diameter measured on cinefilm images was 0.4-6.3% smaller for 0.5-4.5 mm diameter, but on digital images was 13% larger for 1 mm diameter, 18% larger for 0.75 mm diameter and 28% larger for 0.5 mm diameter. Under clinical conditions, the reference vessel diameter measured at the stenosis and the percentage stenosis were well correlated between the analog and digital images. CONCLUSIONS: Reference diameters of stenotic vessels are almost the same on cinefilm and digital images, but stenotic diameters under 1 mm are larger than actual size on digital images and on cinefilm images.     

Evaluation of a new non-mydriatic digital camera for detection of diabetic retinopathy.

AIMS: To compare the results of fundus photography using a new non-mydriatic digital camera with the results of reference standard of Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) retinal photographs, for the detection of diabetic retinopathy (DR). METHODS: Fundus colour photographs were taken with a Topcon non-mydriatic camera of 147 eyes of 74 diabetic patients, without pupillary dilation (five overlapping fields of 45 degrees; posterior pole, nasal, temporal, superior and inferior). Three retinal specialists classified the photographs in a masked fashion, as showing no DR or mild non-proliferative DR (NPDR) not requiring referral, moderate or more severe NPDR and/or macular oedema, or as non-gradable image requiring referral. ETDRS 35-mm colour slides served as reference images for DR detection. RESULTS: For moderately severe to severe DR, the sensitivities of detection reported by the three observers were 92, 100 and 92%, respectively, and the specificities, 87, 85, and 88%. For four levels of DR severity (none or mild NPDR, moderate NPDR, severe NPDR and proliferative DR), the percentages of exact agreement between the three observers on the retinopathy grades assigned to the non-mydriatic photographs and to the ETDRS reference slides were 94.6, 93 and 87.6%, respectively (kappa 0.60-0.80). Sixteen eyes of nine patients (11%) were judged ungradable by at least one observer. In a second series of 110 patients, evaluated in the setting of a screening procedure, fewer photographs were ungradable (< 6%). CONCLUSION: These results suggest that fundus photographs taken by the Topcon TRC-NW6S non-mydriatic camera, without pupillary dilation, are suitable for DR screening.     

Automated detection of microaneurysms in digital red-free photographs: a diabetic retinopathy screening tool.

AIMS: To develop a technique to detect microaneurysms automatically in 50 degrees digital red-free fundus photographs and evaluate its performance as a tool for screening diabetic patients for retinopathy. METHODS: Candidate microaneurysms are extracted, after the image has been modified to remove variations in background intensity, by algorithms that enhance small round features. Each microaneurysm candidate is then classified according to its intensity and size by the application of a set of rules derived from a training set of 102 images. RESULTS: When 3,783 individual images were analysed and the results compared with the opinion of a clinical research fellow examining the same images, the program achieved a sensitivity of 81% and a specificity of 93% for the detection of images containing microaneurysms. Nine hundred and twenty-five sets of 4 images per patient were then analysed and the total number of microaneurysms detected compared with the overall patient retinopathy grade derived by the clinician examining the same images. In this context, intended to mimic a screening situation, the program achieved a sensitivity of 85% and a specificity of 76% for the detection of patients with (any) retinopathy (positive predictive value 0.71, negative predictive value 0.88). CONCLUSIONS: An automated technique was developed to detect retinopathy in digital red-free fundus images that can form part of a diabetic retinopathy screening programme. It is believed that it can perform a useful role in this context identifying images worthy of closer inspection or eliminating 50% or more of the screening population who have no retinopathy.     

Outcome of HIV-infected patients transferred to a specialist inpatient unit

The British HIV Association (BHIVA) recommends that specialist clinical networks are involved in care of HIV-positive patients admitted to district general hospitals (DGHs) and that transfer to a specialist HIV treatment centre is considered for each patient. We audited our experience of 29 patients transferred to our specialist inpatient unit over a two year period. Fifteen (52%) patients were known to be HIV-infected before admission to the referring hospital. Ten (71%) of 14 patients with newly diagnosed HIV had an opportunistic infection at transfer. At the referring hospital the time taken to diagnose HIV infection ranged from one to 26 days (median = 3.5). Only five patients (17%) were transferred by 72 hours of admission to the referring hospital. The duration of stay at our centre was 1-212 days (median = 15): seven patients (24%) required admission to the intensive care unit. Seven patients died; of these, three had newly diagnosed HIV infection. This audit demonstrates that sick HIV-infected patients transferred to a specialist HIV unit had a poor outcome and lengthy hospital admissions. Our audit supports roll-out of HIV testing to avoid adverse outcomes associated with late diagnosis and development of clinical networks involving specialist HIV treatment centres in order to support provision of HIV care in DGHs.     

Fundus photography for the screening for diabetic retinopathy

Despite the efficacy of laser photocoagulation to prevent complications of diabetic retinopathy, diabetic retinopathy remains a major cause of visual impairment and blindness in France. This is mainly due to a too late diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy. In an effort to detect diabetic retinopathy at an early stage before visual loss, international and national guidelines for the screening for diabetic retinopathy have been developed, which recommend annual fundus examination for all diabetic patients. In France, a recent survey showed that less than 50% of diabetic patients had had an eye examination during the previous year. With the increasing number of diabetic patients and the decreasing number of ophthalmologists, this situation should not improve by the next 15 years. Fundus photography is a method at least as sensitive as ophthalmoscopy in the screening for diabetic retinopathy. New nonmydriatic cameras and digital photography may allow a network organization of several screening centers around a central ophthalmological reading center where digital images could be transmitted. This organization should improve the screening for diabetic retinopathy, while saving medical time.     

A prospective cohort study of healthcare visits and rehospitalizations after discharge of patients with community-acquired pneumonia

Background and objective: The aim of this study was to identify the frequency of, reasons for, and risk factors associated with additional health‐care visits and re‐hospitalizations (health‐care interactions) among patients with community‐acquired pneumonia (CAP), within 30 days of discharge from hospital. Methods: This was an observational analysis of a prospective cohort of adults hospitalized with CAP at a tertiary hospital in 2007–2009. Additional health‐care interactions were defined as visits to a primary care centre or emergency department, and hospital readmissions within 30 days of discharge. Results: Of the 934 patients hospitalized with CAP, 282 (34.1%) had additional health‐care interactions within 30 days of discharge from hospital; 149 (52.8%) required an additional visit to a primary care centre and 177 (62.8%) attended the emergency department. Seventy‐two patients (25.5%) were readmitted to hospital. The main reasons for additional health‐care interactions were worsening of signs or symptoms of CAP and new or worsening comorbidities that were unrelated to pneumonia, mainly cardiovascular and pulmonary diseases. The only independent factor associated with visits to a primary care centre or the emergency department was alcohol abuse (OR 1.65; 95% CI: 1.03–2.64). Hospitalization in the previous 90 days (OR 2.47; 95% CI: 1.11–5.52) and comorbidities (OR 3.99; 95% CI: 1.12–14.23) were independently associated with re‐hospitalization. Conclusions: Additional health‐care visits and re‐hospitalizations within 30 days of discharge from hospital were common among patients with CAP. This was mainly due to worsening of signs or symptoms of CAP and/or comorbidities. These findings may have implications for discharge planning and follow up of patients with CAP.     

Systematic screening for diabetic retinopathy with a digital fundus camera following pupillary dilatation in a university diabetes department.

AIMS: Screening for diabetic retinopathy (DR) is highly inadequate in France because of insufficient infrastructure and increasing disease prevalence. We describe the results of the first systematic DR screening programme established in a university diabetes department. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study conducted over 1 year, consecutive adult patients underwent three-field retinal photography with the Topcon TRC NW6S digital fundus camera following pupillary dilatation with Tropicamide 1%. A questionnaire provided information on patients' systemic and ocular history. Glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) was measured at the screening visit.Two ophthalmologists graded the retinal photographs in a masked fashion. RESULTS: Of 1157 patients attending the diabetes department, 1153 (99.7%)underwent photographic screening. Images were gradable in 96% patients.Diabetic retinopathy was detected in 522 (45%) patients and sight-threatening DR in 167 (14%). Of 704 (61%) patients previously believed to have no DR,254 (34%) screened positive. The presence of DR was associated with age,insulin use and non-Caucasian ethnicity in Type 2 patients, and with duration of diabetes and HbA1c in Type 1 and Type 2 patients. Associated ocular pathologies were diagnosed in 612 (53%) patients. CONCLUSIONS: Our photographic screening programme using pharmacological mydriasis provided a high screening coverage feasible in a hospital setting. We obtained information regarding prevalence and associated risk factors of DR inpatients attending a tertiary care centre. Screening was well accepted by patients and met with no protest from city ophthalmologists. It generated considerable interest among endocrinologists and feedback of results is expected to improve optimization of glycaemic control.     

Appendix to dialysis centre guidelines: recommendations for the relationship between outpatient haemodialysis centres and reference hospitals. Opinions from the Outpatient Dialysis Group. Grupo de Trabajo de Hemodiálisis Extrahospitalaria

INTRODUCTION: The different clinical guidelines backed by the Spanish Society of Nephrology (SEN) attempt to homogenise the monitoring of renal patients. However, this effort to homogenise treatment has been obstructed in the case of renal replacement therapy patients on haemodialysis due to, among other reasons, the existence of several different dialysis providers, with private centres located in many cities, each with their own reference hospitals and different criteria for treatment based on the existing outsourcing services agreements with the public health service, which also differ between regions. A good relationship between a private dialysis centre and its reference hospital would lead to equal treatment for all dialysis patients, at least at that particular town. The SEN, through the efforts of the Grupo de Trabajo de Hemodiálisis Extrahospitalaria (Outpatient Haemodialysis Group), has prioritised a close relationship and good communication between reference hospitals and dialysis centres in order to guarantee proper continuity of the health care given to these patients. STRATEGIES FOR IMPROVEMENT: Conditions for referring patients from one centre to another. A patient that starts a haemodialysis programme should be referred from a reference hospital with a definitive vascular access for optimising treatment, with a full report updated within 24-48 hours before the transferral, including essential information for providing proper nephrological treatment: primary pathology, recent viral serology (including hepatitis B and C virus [HBV and HCV] and human immunodeficiency virus [HIV]), parameters for anaemia and calcium-phosphorus metabolism, and ions, date of the first session of dialysis, and the number and dates of blood transfusions received. Furthermore, patients referred from the dialysis centre to the hospital, whether for programmed visits or emergency hospitalisation, should be accompanied by an updated report indicating the primary diagnoses, recent events, viral serology and laboratory analyses, updated haemodialysis and treatment regimens used, and the reason for transferral to the hospital. A single, digital clinical history that is accessible by both institutions would facilitate this situation, although this option is not completely available to all centres and hospitals. There are also legal issues to resolve in this aspect. Continued care for dialysis patients. Good communication between dialysis centres and hospitals is fundamental for achieving a proper level of care for dialysis patients, and not only with the nephrology department. The interconsultations of dialysis patients at each private centre, as well as the requests for diagnostic tests, should be able to be requested by the centre directly. The results and reports from these interconsultations should also be sent to the centre. It would also be best if the reference hospitals and their private dialysis centres shared common treatment protocols. These protocols should include basic aspects of the treatment of renal patients (anaemia, mineral metabolism, vascular accesses including catheter infections, etc., and laboratory tests), transplant protocols, complementary tests, and other components specific to each area. Not only would this generalise and unify the approach taken with dialysis patients regardless of where they are treated, it would also facilitate access to data on all patients regarding clinical trials and research studies. Access to medication. Dialysis patients require medications that are only given in the hospital setting, which is normally provided by the reference hospital, as per the agreement between institutions. It would also be recommendable that any other medications not included in the agreement (antibiotics, urokinase, nutritional supplements, etc.) be dispensed in a similar manner. Access to kidney transplant. The management of the transplant waiting list, once a patient starts renal replacement therapy, should be controlled from the dialysis centre, as in any other procedure. As such, the nephrologists from each centre should be familiar with the existing protocols and new developments in this context, and should participate in meetings with nephrology and urology departments in each hospital. The transplant protocol at each town/region should be followed for all patients, whether dialysis is undergone in a hospital or private centre. Characteristics of the work at dialysis centres. The doctor attending patients at each dialysis centre must be a specialist in nephrology. This complicated issue must be a requirement for agreements within the regional health system in order to guarantee a proper and equitable treatment of patients that receive dialysis in private centres. Only in the case of an absence of a nephrologist should a general practitioner be used, and this doctor must have adequate training in haemodialysis. This training should also be standardised. Over 75% of nephrologists that work at these centres are alone during the workday, and 40% never see another colleague during the whole shift. The administrators of these centres should seek out protocols that provide professional contact, both with the hospital staff and nephrologists from other centres, which would facilitate an exchange of ideas. Training. The nephrologists at each centre have the right and the obligation to perform research and to continuously expand their training, so as to develop and improve health care provision. Since the majority of patients in haemodialysis programmes are treated in outpatient centres that depend on reference hospitals, we might suggest a minimal rotation of nephrology residents in private outpatient dialysis centres, once accreditation has been given for providing this training.     

A comparative evaluation of digital imaging, retinal photography and optometrist examination in screening for diabetic retinopathy.

AIMS: To compare the respective performances of digital retinal imaging, fundus photography and slit-lamp biomicroscopy performed by trained optometrists, in screening for diabetic retinopathy. To assess the potential contribution of automated digital image analysis to a screening programme. METHODS: A group of 586 patients recruited from a diabetic clinic underwent three or four mydriatic screening methods for retinal examination. The respective performances of digital imaging (n=586; graded manually), colour slides (n=586; graded manually), and slit-lamp examination by specially trained optometrists (n=485), were evaluated against a reference standard of slit-lamp biomicroscopy by ophthalmologists with a special interest in medical retina. The performance of automated grading of the digital images by computer was also assessed. RESULTS: Slit-lamp examination by optometrists for referable diabetic retinopathy achieved a sensitivity of 73% (52-88) and a specificity of 90% (87-93). Using two-field imaging, manual grading of red-free digital images achieved a sensitivity of 93% (82-98) and a specificity of 87% (84-90), and for colour slides, a sensitivity of 96% (87-100) and a specificity of 89% (86-91). Almost identical results were achieved for both methods with single macular field imaging. Digital imaging had a lower technical failure rate (4.4% of patients) than colour slide photography (11.9%). Applying an automated grading protocol to the digital images detected any retinopathy, with a sensitivity of 83% (77-89) and a specificity of 71% (66-75) and diabetic macular oedema with a sensitivity of 76% (53-92) and a specificity of 85% (82-88). CONCLUSIONS: Both manual grading methods produced similar results whether using a one- or two-field protocol. Technical failures rates, and hence need for recall, were lower with digital imaging. One-field grading of fundus photographs appeared to be as effective as two-field. The optometrists achieved the lowest sensitivities but reported no technical failures. Automated grading of retinal images can improve efficiency of resource utilization in diabetic retinopathy screening.     

Managing suspected venous thromboembolism in a mixed primary and secondary care setting using standard clinical assessment and D-dimer in a noninvasive diagnostic strategy.

Venous thromboembolism is a potentially lethal disease if not properly treated. Noninvasive strategies have become an attractive clinical option for effective diagnosis. There has been controversy, however, regarding the use of standard clinical rules in a primary care setting. The objective of the present study was to validate a noninvasive diagnostic strategy in an emergency unit giving assistance to patients with primary and secondary care needs. A total of 291 outpatients (primary and secondary care needs) with suspected venous thromboembolism attending the emergency unit of a general hospital from August 2002 to 2004 were retrospectively evaluated. The diagnostic strategy included assessment of risk for venous thromboembolism and a rapid quantitative enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay D-dimer test. Venous thromboembolism was ruled out in patients with a low-probability or intermediate-probability risk (or an unlikely diagnosis) and a negative D-dimer. The prevalence of venous thromboembolism was 8.2%. Patients with an unlikely diagnosis comprised 93.8% of the evaluations for deep venous thrombosis, and those with a low probability for pulmonary embolism comprised 81.4%. Proportions of patients with venous thromboembolic events observed were 7.2% in patients with an unlikely diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis and 3.0% in those with low probability for pulmonary embolism. The percentage of patients with a thrombotic event excluded using this strategy was 37% (positive predictive value 13%, negative predictive value 100%). In conclusion, this noninvasive clinical strategy is safe for ruling out venous thromboembolism, and excludes the need for imaging tests in about one-third of the patients in the population studied.     

Improving the continuity of care following discharge of patients hospitalized with heart failure: is the discharge summary adequate?

OBJECTIVE: To determine the adequacy of the discharge summary in reporting important investigative results and future management plans in patients hospitalized and discharged with a diagnosis of heart failure. DESIGN: During a six-month period, all patient charts were identified and reviewed in which heart failure had been the most responsible discharge diagnosis. Trained, independent chart reviewers recorded predefined key aspects of the typed and handwritten discharge summaries including measurement of left ventricular function, utilization of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI), management of risk factors, and instructions for follow-up treatment and appointments. SETTING: Single centre, tertiary care teaching hospital. MAIN RESULTS: One hundred and one patient charts meeting review criteria were identified. Eighty-two contained a typed (dictated) discharge summary and 82 contained a copy of a one-page preformatted but handwritten summary given to the patient at discharge with instructions to give to their primary care physician. Forty-one per cent of typed discharge summaries did not record any known evaluation of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Of patients with LVEF < or =40%, 34% were not prescribed an ACEI at time of discharge. Of these patients, a contraindication was documented in 26% but there was no documentation of a contraindication or reason in 24%. In patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy as the principal attributed cause of heart failure, 80% of discharge summaries had no specific instructions addressing modifiable risk factors. Follow-up instructions for family physician visits were not mentioned in 56% of typed discharge summaries. CONCLUSIONS: Substantial inadequacies exist in communicating to the community physician, at the time of discharge from an acute care teaching hospital, valuable patient management information of patients with heart failure. This may have implications for continuity of care and subsequent clinical outcomes.