Hepatic resection for noncolorectal,nonneuroendocrine metastases

Resection of certain hepatic metastases of noncolorectal, nonneuroendocrine (NCNNE) origin provides actual long-term (>5 years) survival. We conducted a retrospective outcome study at a single tertiary referral institution. Between January 1988 and October 1998, 64 consecutive patients underwent resection of hepatic metastases from NCNNE primary tumors. Overall and disease-free survival rates were correlated to clinicopathologic factors and operative morbidity and mortality. Thirteen patients underwent a right hepatectomy, 6 underwent a left hepatectomy, 3 had extended right and 2 extended left hepatectomy, 2 patients had segmentectomy, 24 underwent wedge resections, and 14 underwent a combination of these forms of resection. R0 resection was achieved in 56 patients (87.5%). The operative mortality was 1.5% (1 of 64). Actual 1-, 3-, and 5-year survivals were 81%, 43%, and 30%, respectively. The factor adversely associated with overall and disease-free survival was uniformly related to the interval between primary tumor resection and the development of hepatic metastases. A 1.5% operative mortality and an actual 5-year survival of 30% justifies hepatic resection, including major hepatic resection, for certain NCNNE metastases. The factor affecting prognosis in this highly select group of patients was the biological behavior of the tumor, with tumors that metastasize earlier having poorer survival rates. Presented at the Forty-Sixth Annual Meeting of The Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, Chicago, Illinois, May 14–18, 2005 (poster presentation).     

Cryoablation and liver resection for noncolorectal liver metastases

BACKGROUND: Liver resection for noncolorectal liver metastases has merit for selected primary tumor types. The role of cryosurgical tumor ablation within this cohort of patients has not been evaluated. This is a single institutional review of treatment outcomes using cryosurgical ablation and conventional resection techniques for noncolorectal liver metastases. METHODS: The medical records of 42 patients undergoing 48 hepatic tumor ablative procedures from February 1991 through May 2001 at a single institution were retrospectively reviewed. Overall survival and local hepatic tumor recurrence-free survival were analyzed for different surgical procedures and primary tumor types. RESULTS: Overall survival rates at 1, 3, and 5 years are 82%, 55%, and 39%, respectively (median survival, 45 months). Local hepatic tumor recurrence-free survival rates for resection only (n = 25) and cryosurgery with or without resection (n = 23), at 3 years are 24% and 19%, respectively. The survival rates at 5 years are 40% and 37%, for resection only and cryosurgery with or without resection, respectively. CONCLUSION: Cryosurgical hepatic tumor ablation for metastatic noncolorectal primary tumors results in survival and local hepatic tumor recurrence rates similar to resection alone. The combination of cryosurgery and resection extends the cohort of patients with surgically treatable disease.     

Management of potentially resectable colorectal cancer liver metastases

Colorectal cancer is a very common malignancy worldwide and development of liver metastases,both synchronous or metachronous,is a common event.Of all patients with metastatic colorectal cancer,up to 77% have a liver-only disease and approximately 10%-20% of patients with colorectal liver metastases are considered resectable at the time of diagnosis.Surgical resection of liver metastases remains the best treatment option and it is associated with a survival plateau and a 20%-25% of long-term survivors.Perioperative chemotherapy for resectable liver metastases may improve resecability of liver metastases and disease free survival,but its impact on overall survival is still unclear and more studies are needed.Moreover,preoperative chemotherapy can increase postoperative complications.Further studies are needed to define the role of adjuvant chemotherapy after a R0 resection of liver metastases and to define the criteria for a better selection of patients candidate to hepatectomy.New strategies such as targeted therapies are emerging with promising results.Optimal management requires a multidisciplinary approach,local and systemic,but it is a still pending question.Colorectal liver metastases represent a major challenge for oncologists and surgeons.In this review will be analyzed available data about assessment and management of the patients with potentially resectable colorectal liver metastases.     

The Role of Staging Laparoscopy in Hepatobiliary Malignancy: Prospective Analysis of 401 Cases

Background:Patients with potentially resectable hepatobiliary malignancy are frequently found to have unresectable tumors at laparotomy. We prospectively evaluated staging laparoscopy in patients with resectable disease on preoperative imaging.Methods:Staging laparoscopy was performed on 410 patients with potentially resectable hepatobiliary malignancy. The preoperative likelihood of resectability was recorded. Data on preoperative imaging, operative findings, and hospital course were analyzed.Results:Laparoscopic inspection was complete in 291 (73%) patients. In total, 153 patients (38%) had unresectable disease, 84 of whom were identified laparoscopically, increasing resectability from 62% to 78%. On multivariate analysis, a complete examination, preoperative likelihood of resection, and primary diagnosis were significant predictors of identifying unresectable disease at laparoscopy. The highest yield was for biliary cancers, and the lowest was for metastatic colorectal cancer. In patients with unresectable disease identified at laparoscopy, the mean hospital stay was 3 days, and postoperative morbidity was 9%, compared with 8 days and 27%, respectively, in patients found to have unresectable disease at laparotomy.Conclusions:Laparoscopy spared one in five patients a laparotomy while reducing hospital stay and morbidity. Targeting laparoscopy to patients at high risk for unresectable disease requires consideration of disease-specific factors; however, the surgeons preoperative impression of resectability is also important.     

Liver resection for noncolorectal, nonneuroendocrine metastases

In noncolorectal, nonendocrine liver metastases, the role of surgery is less define than in colorectal or neuroendocrine cancer. This role is marginal as liver is not the primary site of metastases of these cancers. Less than 2 to 5% of the patients with these malignancies might be one day considered as potential candidates for liver resection, as most patients suffer from extra hepatic tumour spread at the time they develop liver involvement. However, in these few cases with liver metastases only, as no other therapeutic option may provide mid- or long-term tumour-free survival, liver resection is indicated in resectable liver metastases. Some prognostic factors have been established in the literature from the few published series: unique versus multiple hepatic metastases, unilobar vs bilobar, metachronous vs synchronous, R0 vs R1 or R2 liver resections. The type of primary tumour is also of great importance, as cutaneous melanoma, pancreatic and gastric adenocarcinoma have a very bad prognosis for liver resection of metastases, even after R0 resection. In these cases, percutaneous or laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation may find its place. In sarcoma, breast carcinoma, uveal melanoma, and genitourinary cancers, liver resection may provide satisfactory long-term results in selected cases, and is the standard of care for isolated, resectable metastasis. However, due to the scarcity of indication of liver resection for noncolorectal, nonneuroendocrine metastases, the decision should be multidisciplinary, and the patients should be informed of the advantages and pitfalls of the surgical procedure.     

手术治疗大肠癌肝转移的疗效分析及预后因素探讨

探讨大肠癌术后肝转移手术切的疗效及影响术后生存率的有关因素,总结改进远期疗效的措施。方法对８７例大肠癌肝转移病人术后进行长期随访,并对治疗中相关因素进行统计分析,对比研究。结论早发现早切除,治疗中的相关因素,术后密切则,发现早期复发和转移,争再切除以及加强术后综合治疗是提高过期疗效的关键。     

Safety and efficacy of hepatic vein reconstruction for colorectal liver metastases

Background

Colorectal liver metastases with hepatic vein (HV) involvement may require combined resection of the liver and HV. However, the short- and long-term outcomes of such a procedure remain unclear.

Methods

We reviewed 16 cases of liver resection with major HV resection and reconstruction.

Results

The patients had a median age of 58.5 years (range, 50–74 y). In total, 18 HVs were reconstructed using a customized great saphenous vein graft (n = 10), direct anastomosis (n = 1), external iliac vein (n = 2), portal vein (n = 1), umbilical vein patch graft (n = 3), or ovarian vein patch graft (n = 1). There was no hospital mortality, and the morbidity rate was 50%. With a median follow-up period of 30 months (range, 4–89 mo), 3 patients died of tumor recurrence and 13 were alive with (n = 6) and without (n = 7) disease. Cumulative 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates were 93%, 76%, and 76%, respectively.

Conclusions

HV resection and reconstruction combined with liver resection can be performed safely with reasonable long-term results.     

Repeat hepatic resection as effective treatment for recurrent colorectal liver metastases

Background: Approximately 20–40% of patients who undergo liver resection for colorectal metastases develop recurrent disease confined to the liver. The goals of this study were to determine whether the survival benefit of repeat hepatic resection justified the potential morbidity and mortality. Methods: A retrospective review was performed on all patients who underwent liver resection for colorectal cancer metastases between 1983 and 1995 (N=202). Repeat liver resections were performed on 23 patients for recurrent metastases. Results: There were no operative deaths in the 23 patients, and the postoperative morbidity rate was 22%. The 5-year actuarial survival rate after repeat resection was 32%, with a median length of survival of 39.9 months. There were three patients who survived for >5 years after repeat resection. Sixteen patients (70%) developed recurrent disease at a median interval of 11 months after the second resection; 10 of these 16 patients (62%) had new hepatic metastases. No clinical or pathological factors were significant in predicting long-term survival. Conclusions: Repeat liver resection for recurrent colorectal metastases (a) can be performed safely with acceptable mortality and morbidity rates and (b) may result in long-term survival in some patients.Presented at the 49th Annual Cancer Symposium of The Society of Surgical Oncology, Atlanta, Georgia, March 21–24, 1996.     

Improved survival after resection of colorectal liver metastases

Background: The goal of this study was to determine if staging with intraoperative ultrasound (IOUS), assessment of porta hepatis lymph nodes, and evaluation of resection margins can improve selection of patients likely to benefit from resection of colorectal liver metastases. Methods: A retrospective evaluation was performed on patients undergoing celiotomy with intent to resect colorectal liver metastases. Patients were considered unresectable if extrahepatic disease was identified by peritoneal exploration or if IOUS demonstated greater than four lesions or the inability to achieve negative margins. Tumor-negative margins were confirmed by pathologic evaluation. Actuarial 5-year survival was calculated using the method of Kaplan and Meier. Results: Median follow-up is 25 months. Of the 151 patients undergoing operative exploration, 107 (71.0%) underwent liver resection (all margins tumor negative). Three operative deaths occurred in this group (2.8%). The disease of 30 patients (19.8%) was considered unresectable due to extrahepatic involvement, and that of 14 patients (9.2%) was demonstrated by IOUS to be unresectable. Five-year actuarial survival was 44% for the resected group and 0% for the unresectable patients (p<0.0001). Conclusions: IOUS, portal node assessment, and pathologic margin evaluation improves the selection of patients likely to benefit from resection of colorectal liver metastases. Presented at the 47th Annual Cancer Symposium of The Society of Surgical Oncology, Houston, Texas, March 17–20, 1994.     

Partial hepatectomy for metastases from noncolorectal, nonneuroendocrine carcinoma

OBJECTIVE: To define perioperative and long-term outcome and prognostic factors in patients undergoing hepatectomy for liver metastases arising from noncolorectal and nonneuroendocrine (NCNN) carcinoma. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Hepatic resection is a well-established therapy for patients with liver metastases from colorectal or neuroendocrine carcinoma. However, for patients with liver metastases from other carcinomas, the value of resection is incompletely defined and still debated. METHODS: Between April 1981 and April 2002, 141 patients underwent hepatic resection for liver metastases from NCNN carcinoma. Patient demographics, tumor characteristics, treatment, and postoperative outcome were analyzed. RESULTS: Thirty-day postoperative mortality was 0% and 46 of 141 (33%) patients developed postoperative complications. The median follow up was 26 months (interquartile range [IQR]) 10-49 months); the median follow up for survivors was 35 months (IQR 11-68 months). There have been 24 actual 5-year survivors so far. The actuarial 3-year relapse-free survival rate was 30% (95% confidence interval [CI], 21-39%) with a median of 17 months. The actuarial 3-year cancer-specific survival rate was 57% (95% CI, 48-67%) with a median of 42 months. Primary tumor type and length of disease-free interval from the primary tumor were significant independent prognostic factors for relapse-free and cancer-specific survival. Margin status was significant for cancer-specific survival and showed a strong trend for relapse-free survival. CONCLUSIONS: Hepatic resection for metastases from NCNN carcinoma is safe and can offer long-term survival in selected patients. Hepatic resection should be considered if all gross disease can be removed, especially in patients with metastases from reproductive tract tumors or a disease-free interval greater than 2 years.     

Liver resection for hepatic metastases: 15 years of experience

Background/Purpose: Liver metastases, especially those from primary colorectal cancers, are treatable and potentially curable. Imaging techniques such as computed tomography, magnetic resonance, and ultrasonography have advanced in recent years and led to increased sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of liver metastases. Liver surgery also has been revolutionized in the past two decades. Dissection along nonanatomical lines has permitted the resection of multiple lesions that previously might have been considered unresectable. Methods: From 1986 to 2000, 181 patients underwent liver resection for hepatic metastasis from colorectal cancer. Of these, 56 patients underwent systematic anatomical major hepatic resection and 125 underwent nonanatomical limited resection. Results: Operative morbidity and mortality rates were higher in patients in whom anatomical procedures were performed. The overall 5-year survival rate of the 181 patients was 39.8%. Conclusions: An aggressive surgical procedure in patients with hepatic colorectal metastases is safe, and may prolong overall survival, and therefore should be considered in all patients with metastases confined to the liver. Received: April 14, 2002 / Accepted: May 12, 2002 Offprint requests to: G. Belli Via Cimarosa 2/a, 80127 — Naples, Italy Accepted at fifth World Congress of the International Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association (IHPBA)     

Treatment for multiple bilobar liver metastases of colorectal cancer

Background Recent advances have extended indications for hepatectomy to include multiple bilobar colorectal liver metastases (CLM). Staging systems based on the biological malignancy of primary and metastatic tumors provide appropriate indications for hepatectomy in CLM. However, suitability for resection in patients with complex and extensive hepatic metastases is controversial. Methods A medline search was performed to identify papers reporting the resection for CLM. Techniques, indication, and results were reviewed. Results If the anticipated remnant liver volume is small (25–40% of total), suggesting a high risk of postoperative liver failure, portal vein embolization (PVE) is recommended prior to hepatectomy. However, curative resections are not always possible. Specifically in synchronous multiple bilobar CLM, two-stage hepatectomy, comprising bilateral hepatectomy and primary resection with or without PVE, can prevent growth of ipsilateral metastatic nodules in the remnant liver and reduce surgical risk. Several local ablation techniques can complement surgery if hepatic resection alone increases the risk of postoperative liver failure or is not curative. Chemotherapy combined with targeted treatment can suppress recurrence and extend indications for hepatectomy by reducing the size and number of primary irresectable tumors. Conclusion PVE or staged procedure combining with local ablation or neoadjuvant, downstaging or adjuvant therapies extends indications for hepatectomy to include multiple bilobar CLM. The 5-year survival rate for multiple bilobar CLM treated with alternating hepatectomy and chemotherapy is comparable to the values reported for single and hemilateral CLM.     

Optimizing the approach to patients with potentially resectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer

Liver metastases are a common event in colorectal carcinoma. Significant advances have been made in managing these patients in the last decade, including improvements in staging and surgical techniques, an increasing armamentarium of chemotherapeutics and multiple local ablative techniques. While combination chemotherapy significantly improves median patient survival, surgical resection provides the only prospect of cure and is the focus of this review. Interpretation of published work in this field is challenging, particularly as there is no consensus to what is resectable disease. Of particular interest recently has been the use of neoadjuvant treatment for downstaging and downsizing disease in patients with initially unresectable liver metastases, in the hope of response leading to potentially curative surgery. This review summarizes the recent developments and consensus guidelines in the areas of staging, chemotherapy, local ablative techniques, radiation therapy and surgery, emphasizing the multidisciplinary approach to this disease and ongoing controversies in this field and examines the changing paradigms in the management of colorectal hepatic metastases.     

The safety and effectiveness of liver resection for breast cancer liver metastases: A systematic review

Breast cancer liver metastases have traditionally been considered incurable and any treatment given therefore palliative. Liver resections for breast cancer metastases are being performed, despite there being no robust evidence for which patients benefit. This review aims to determine the safety and effectiveness of liver resection for breast cancer metastases.A systematic literature review was performed and resulted in 33 papers being assembled for analysis. All papers were case series and data extracted was heterogeneous so a meta-analysis was not possible. Safety outcomes were mortality and morbidity (in hospital and 30-day). Effectiveness outcomes were local recurrence, re-hepatectomy, survival (months), 1-, 2-, 3-, 5- year overall survival rate (%), disease free survival (months) and 1-, 2-, 3-, 5- year disease free survival rate (%). Overall median figures were calculated using unweighted median data given in each paper.Results demonstrated that mortality was low across all studies with a median of 0% and a maximum of 5.9%. The median morbidity rate was 15%. Overall survival was a median of 35.1 months and a median 1-, 2-, 3- and 5-year survival of 84.55%, 71.4%, 52.85% and 33% respectively. Median disease free survival was 21.5 months with a 3- and 5-year median disease free survival of 36% and 18%.Whilst the results demonstrate seemingly satisfactory levels of overall survival and disease free survival, the data are of poor quality with multiple confounding variables and small study populations. Recommendations are for extensive pilot and feasibility work with the ultimate aim of conducting a large pragmatic randomised control trial to accurately determine which patients benefit from liver resection for breast cancer liver metastases.     

Use of diagnostic laparoscopy and laparoscopic ultrasound in the management of upper gastrointestinal malignancy

Background: Despite various preoperative imaging methods, unnecessary laparotomy is still quite common in upper gastrointestinal surgery. There have been some studies demonstrating the use of diagnostic laparoscopy and laparoscopic ultrasound in the detection of small peritoneal seedling and vascular encasement of major vessels respectively, and these are the findings often inadequately assessed by preoperative imaging. Objective: This is a study to evaluate the use of diagnostic laparoscopy and selective laparoscopic ultrasound in the management of upper gastrointestinal malignancy. Method: A prospective study was carried out during the period from January 1996 to December 1997. Patients with upper gastrointestinal malignancy underwent diagnostic laparoscopy and selective laparoscopic ultrasound before resection. The role of laparoscopic staging was evaluated according to the number of patients who avoided unnecessary laparotomy. Results: There were 159 patients of mean age 62.8 years diagnosed with upper gastrointestinal tumours during the study period. These patients had various upper gastrointestinal malignancies: gastric carcinoma (89), oesophageal carcinoma (27), hepatobiliary malignancy (26), peri‐ampullary carcinoma (15) and small bowel tumour (2). Routine diagnostic laparoscopy and selective laparoscopic ultrasound were carried out for these patients unless there were contraindications such as a history of previous upper gastrointestinal surgery or the patient required palliative procedure irrespective of resectability. There were 106 diagnostic laparoscopies and 42 laparoscopic ultrasounds performed. Unnecessary operations were avoided in 32 patients (30%) due to either diffuse carcinomatosis or locally advanced tumour with encasement of major vessels. The role of laparoscopic staging in avoiding unnecessary surgery was particularly pronounced in peri‐ampullary carcinoma (46%) and hepatobiliary malignancy (38%). Conclusion: In summary, diagnostic laparoscopy and selective laparoscopic ultrasound are useful in avoiding unnecessary laparotomy particularly in hepatobiliary and peri‐ampullary malignancy.      

The management of solitary colorectal liver metastases

Surgical resection of solitary colorectal liver metastases is associated with long-term survival. Radiofrequency ablation used as the primary treatment option of solitary resectable colorectal liver metastases is associated with an increased risk of local recurrence that generally leads to worse survival compared to resection. In contrast with treatment of other hepatic malignancies, radiofrequency ablation is not equivalent to resection for colorectal liver metastases and should not be used as an alternative but limited to inoperable patients. Although overall survival rate after resection can be up to 71% at 5 years, the majority of patients develop recurrence. Preoperative chemotherapy contributes to decrease the risk of recurrence after resection of colorectal liver metastases. In patients with advanced solitary colorectal liver metastasis initially non suitable for resection, chemotherapy and portal vein embolization contribute to increase the number of surgical candidates whereas radiofrequency is rarely an option.     

A new scoring system to classify patients with colorectal liver metastases: proposal of criteria to select candidates for hepatic resection

Background Although many studies have reported the beneficial effects of hepatic resection for colorectal liver metastases on survival rates, it is still difficult to preoperatively select good candidates for hepatectomy.Methods Fifteen clinicopathological features, which were recognized only before or during surgery, were selected retrospectively in 81 consecutive patients in one hospital (Group I). These features were entered into a multivariate analysis to determine independent and significant variables affecting long-term prognosis after hepatectomy. Using selected variables, we created a scoring formula to classify patients with colorectal liver metastases to select good candidates for hepatic resection. The usefulness of the new scoring system was examined in a series of 70 patients from another hospital (Group II).Results Multivariate analysis, i.e., Cox regression analysis, showed that serosa invasion of primary cancers (P = 0.0720, risk ratio = 2.238); local lymph node metastases of primary cancers, i.e., Dukes C (P = 0.0976, risk ratio = 2.311); multiple nodules of hepatic metastases (P = 0.0461, risk ratio = 2.365); nodules of hepatic metastases greater than 5cm in diameter (P =0.0030, risk ratio = 4.277); and resectable extrahepatic distant metastases (P = 0.0080, risk ratio = 4.038) were significant and independent prognostic factors for poor survival after hepatectomy. Using thsee five variables, we created a new scoring formula to classify patients with colorectal liver metastases. Finally, our new scoring system classified patients in Group II and Group I well, according to long-term outcomes after hepatic resection.Conclusions Our new scoring system to classify patients with colorectal liver metastases is simple and useful in the preoperative selection of good candidates for hepatic resection.     

Laparoscopic stapled left lateral segment liver resection—Technique and results

Because of the favorable anatomy of the left lateral segment of the liver, a totally laparoscopic approach to resection is feasible. Herein we describe a technique for laparoscopic stapled resection of the left lateral segment of the liver, including the necessary anatomic criteria for a safe operation and data on clinical outcome. Five patients at our center underwent laparoscopic exploration, ultrasound examination, and resection of segments II and III. After complete mobilization of the left lateral segment and minimal portal dissection, the totally laparoscopic resections were performed with two endoscopic staple loads (4.5 mm Χ 60 mm) applied sequentially across the portal pedicle and the left hepatic vein. The mean operative time was 182 minutes (range 130 to 240 minutes), blood loss was 41 ml (range 25 to 50 ml), and length of hospital stay was 2.2 days (range 1 to 3 days). All three patients with malignancy had negative surgical margins. All five patients returned to normal activity or work by 1 week postoperatively. There were no complications. Patients with isolated malignant and benign diseases of the left lateral segment of the liver are candidates for totally laparoscopic resection, if evaluation demonstrates a normal liver character and hepatic parenchymal thickness less than 3 cm overlying the ligamentum venosum groove. Such patients benefit from the minimally invasive approach, with no compromise in the surgical result as compared to the open approach. Presented at the Fourth Biennial Americas Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Congress, Miami Beach, Florida, February 28, 2003. Supported in part by a Minnesota Medical Foundation Laparoscopy Training Grant (T.D.S.) and the Richard Lewis Varco Surgical Research Award (B.C.L.).     

腹腔镜联合同期开放手术与全开放手术治疗同时性结直肠癌肝转移临床对比研究

目的对比腹腔镜结直肠癌切除(LCS)联合同期开放肝转移灶切除术与同期全开放切除术(TOS)治疗同时性结直肠癌肝转移(sCRLM)的临床疗效,探讨LCS联合同期开放肝转移灶切除术的安全性、短期及中长期疗效。方法回顾性分析2010年1月至2019年3月于海军军医大学附属长海医院肛肠外科行同期切除的sCRLM病人的临床病理资料,其中84例病人行LCS联合同期开放肝转移灶切除术,108例病人行同期TOS,采用倾向得分匹配方法(PSM)对两类病人进行1∶1匹配,最终LCS组(LCS联合同期开放肝转移灶切除术)和TOS组(行同期TOS)两组分别纳入69例病人,对两组病人的临床结果进行对比分析。结果所有病人无90 d内死亡病例。LCS组无中转开放手术病例。LCS组与TOS组相比,术后进食流质时间缩短[(3.54±1.43)d vs.(4.74±1.29)d,t=-5.186 P<0.001],术后住院天数减少[(8.58±4.23)d vs.(13.33±5.21)d,t=-5.880 P<0.001],并发症发生率降低[14例(20.3%)vs.33例(47.8%),χ^2=11.648 P=0.01],术中出血量[(433.77±423.45)mL vs(.422.46±292.37)mL,t=0.182 P=0.855]及手术时间[(277.54±81.88)min vs(.265.80±82.56)min,t=0.839 P=0.403]差异无统计学意义。3年存活率差异无统计学意义(60.0%vs.54.7%,χ^2=1.979,P=0.160),术后无瘤存活率差异无统计学意义(χ^2=3.542,P=0.076)。结论LCS联合同期开放肝转移灶切除术用于治疗sCRLM安全可行,相比传统同期TOS,短期疗效更优,且不影响中长期肿瘤学预后。     

Effects of systemic and regional chemotherapy after hepatic resection for colorectal metastases

Background: Although the survival benefit of hepatic resection for colorectal metastasis has been established, some controversy remains regarding the significance of adjuvant chemotherapy after hepatic resection. Methods: One hundred thirty-two consecutive patients who had liver resection for colorectal metastasis at our hospital between 1980 and 1997 were studied. After curative hepatic resection, 37 patients underwent systemic chemotherapy, administered orally or intraportally. Forty patients had no adjuvant chemotherapy. The chemotherapeutic agents used for oral administration were uracil and Tegafur or Tegafur alone. Mitomycin C (MMC) or 5-FU was used for IV chemotherapy. Combinations of 5-FU/leucovorin or MMC/5-FU (doxorubicin) were used for regional chemotherapy. Univariate and multivariate analyses were applied to test the significance of adjuvant chemotherapy for patient survival or disease-free survival. Results: Overall 5-year survival was 42.2% (95% CL: 31.2%, 53.2%). Among the possible prognostic factors studied, univariate analysis showed a significant difference in survival based on the number of tumors and lymph node metastases in the hepatic hilum. There was a significant difference in disease-free survival based on adjuvant chemotherapy and lymph node metastasis. The multivariate analysis for patient survival selected four prognostic factors (P<.05), including adjuvant chemotherapy, lymph node metastasis, disease-free interval, and tumor size. The multivariate analysis for disease-free survival selected adjuvant chemotherapy, lymph node metastasis, and disease-free interval as significant factors. The most common recurrence site was remnant liver, regardless of adjuvant chemotherapy. Conclusions: Adjuvant chemotherapy significantly improved survival and disease-free survival after hepatic resection for colorectal metastases. It did not decrease recurrence rate in the remnant liver.Presented at the 51st Annual Cancer Symposium of The Society of Surgical Oncology, San Diego, California, March 26–28, 1998.