Possibility of improving the acceptance rateof early detection testing for prostate cancerwith a one-step test for prostate-specific antigen in whole blood

In order to increase the acceptance rate of early detection testing for prostate cancer, a qualitative prostate-specific antigen (PSA) one-step test has been developed. Determining the PSA level with this test system takes 10 min. The blood samples of 190 men were tested in this qualitative assay, which uses 50 microl of EDTA whole blood and in which the results are ascertained visually. Parallel samples were tested in serum-based, quantitative assays (Abbott Imx, EIA). The findings of the two kinds of assays were compared and evaluated regarding their correspondence (<4.0 and > or = 4.0 ng/ml). For the 74 blood samples in which the quantitative assay showed PSA levels <4.0 ng/ml, the PSA one-step test showed 83.8% correct negative results (corresponds to diagnostic specificity). For the 116 samples in which the classic assay showed PSA levels > or = 4.0 ng/ml, the one-step test showed 90.5% correct positive results (sensitivity). The noted deviations appear especially around the cut-off value of 4.0 ng/ml, i.e. within the PSA concentration range of 3.0 < 4.0 and 4.0 < 5.0 ng/ml. The qualitative PSA one-step test presented here demonstrates good reproducibility. It can be conducted by the patient and is easy to use. The test offers a simple, feasible method for early detection programs for prostate cancer. Copyright Copyright 1999 S. Karger AG, Basel     

Screening for prostate cancer using prostate-specific antigen testing in Japanese men on hemodialysis

Objectives The objectives of this study were to evaluate the usefulness of serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening in detecting prostate cancer in Japanese men on hemodialysis, and to analyze features of prostate cancer detected in these patients. Materials and methods This study included 115 male hemodialysis patients aged >55 years who agreed to the measurement of serum PSA value (group A) and 7529 men aged >55 years participating in a PSA mass screening test in Kobe City (group B) between April 2005 and March 2006. Prostate biopsy was recommended in men with serum PSA > 4.0 ng/ml in both groups. Seventy-eight patients with normal renal function aged >55 years diagnosed as having prostate cancer during the same time period as groups A and B were also included as a comparison group (group C). Results There was no significant difference in the distribution of serum PSA values between groups A and B. Prostate biopsy was performed in 8 and 205 men in groups A and B, respectively, and prostate cancer was detected in 5 and 68 in groups A and B, respectively; that is, there was no significant difference in the rate of positive prostate biopsy between these two groups (group A, 62.5%; group B, 33.2%), while the cancer detection rate in group A (4.3%) was significantly greater than that in group B (0.90%). In addition, there was no evident metastasis in five patients on hemodialysis who were diagnosed as having prostate cancer, and their serum PSA, clinical T stage and biopsy Gleason score were similar to those in group C. However, the percent of positive biopsy cores in these five was significantly greater than that in group C. All five were treated by maximal androgen blockade therapy, and all are currently alive without emergence of hormone-refractory diseases. Conclusions These findings indicate that hemodialysis patients may have an increased risk of prostate cancer, and that prostate cancer detected in such patients tends to be relatively advanced. Therefore, it would be recommended for hemodialysis patients to undergo PSA testing to screen for prostate cancer.     

Serum prostate-specific antigen as a predictor of prostate volume in the community: the Krimpen study

OBJECTIVES: Serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is considered a proxy for prostate volume (PV). This study investigates which range of PSA values has the best utility in the determination of PV (<30 cc, at 30, 40, and 50 cc), and whether PSA performs better than digital rectal examination (DRE) when estimating PV. METHODS: In a population-based follow-up study of 1688 men in Krimpen aan den IJssel, The Netherlands, at baseline we estimated PV by DRE and by transrectal planimetric ultrasound (TRUS), in addition to measuring PSA. Men who tested positive for prostate cancer (PCa) at baseline and at 2 and 4 yr of follow-up were excluded from the analyses (n=142). Of the men without PCa, PSA and PV data were available in 1524 participants. RESULTS: Of all 1524 men analysed, 76.7% had a PSA of 0-2.0, 15.0% had a PSA of 2.1-4.0, and 8.3% a PSA>4. Low PSA ranges (0-2 and 2.1-4.0) discriminate better for a PV of 30 cc (eg, in men with a PSA range of 2.1-2.5 ng/ml there was a 72% chance of having a PV>30 cc). Higher ranges of PSA (>4.0) discriminate better for a PV>40 or 50 cc. (eg, in men with a PSA in the range of 4.1-7.0 ng/ml there was a 69% chance of having a PV>40 cc and in men with a PSA>10 ng/ml there was a 75% chance of a PV>50 cc). The receiver operating curve (ROC) for the performance of PSA in estimating a PV>30 cc shows an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.79, denoting reasonable discrimination, and AUCs of 0.86 and 0.92, denoting good discrimination of PVs>40 cc and >50 cc, respectively. PSA performed significantly better than DRE at estimating PV. Multiple regression analysis shows that both DRE and an interaction term for age and PSA provided minimal additional information beyond PSA in the prediction of PV; however, their contribution is numerically minimal/not clinically meaningful. CONCLUSIONS: In men for whom a diagnosis of PCa has been ruled out, PSA can be used to detect an enlarged prostate (>30 cc and with more accuracy PV>40 or 50 cc). More precision in estimating PV can be obtained when using a formula that contains PSA, age, DRE, and an interaction term between age and PSA; however, the clinical advantage of the formula over PSA alone is only modest as shown by the ROC curves. Thus, for clinicians looking for an easy and fast way to identify patients with an enlarged prostate, PSA is a good approximation for men without PCa.     

A comparison of prostate cancer detection rates by 12 or 6 core biopsy at different prostate-specific antigen densities in Korean men

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the diagnostic value of 12 core biopsy versus sextant biopsy at different prostatic-specific antigen densities (PSAD). METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the records of 1,463 patients who underwent transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsies at our institution. 995 patients underwent 12 core biopsy and 468 sextant biopsy of the prostate. The cancer detection rates achieved by these two methods were analyzed at different PSAD levels. RESULTS: All patients were stratified into 5 groups according to PSAD level; group A: PSAD < 0.1 (n = 290), group B: 0.1 /= 0.4 (n = 231). In group B, 12 core biopsy had a higher detection rate than 6 core biopsy (P = 0.017). CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate 12 core biopsy is better able to detect cancer than 6 core biopsy in patients with a PSAD in the range 0.1-0.2, which suggests that PSAD be considered when deciding on the number of prostate biopsy cores required.     

The comparability of models for predicting the risk of a positive prostate biopsy with prostate-specific antigen alone: a systematic review

CONTEXT: The sensitivity and specificity profile of measuring levels of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) to select men for prostate biopsy is not optimal. This has prompted the construction of nomograms and artificial neural networks (ANNs) to increase the performance of PSA measurements. OBJECTIVE: A systematic review of nomograms and ANNs designed to predict the risk of a positive prostate biopsy for cancer was conducted in order to determine their value versus measuring PSA levels alone. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (U.S. National Library of Medicine's life science database; MEDLINE) was searched using the terms "nomogram" "artificial neural network" and "prostate cancer" for dates up to and including July 2007 and was supplemented by manual searches of reference lists. Included studies used an assessment tool to examine the risk of a positive prostate biopsy in a man without a known cancer diagnosis. Intramodel comparisons with evaluation of PSA levels alone, and intermodel comparisons of area under the curve (AUC) from receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were conducted. Individual case examples were also used for comparisons. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Twenty-three studies examining 36 models were included. With the exception of two studies, all the models had AUC values of 0.70 or greater, with eight reporting an AUC of >/=0.80 and four (all ANNs) reporting an AUC >/=0.85, with variable validation status. Fourteen studies compared the AUC with PSA levels alone: all showed a benefit from using AUCs which varied from 0.02 to 0.26. Of the 16 external validation comparisons, in 13 the AUC was lower in the external population than in the model population. CONCLUSIONS: Nomograms and ANNs produce improvements in AUC over measurement of PSA levels alone, but many lack external validation. Where this is available, the benefits are often diminished, although most remain significantly better than with evaluation of PSA levels alone. In men without additional risk factors, PSA cutoff values alone provide a relatively precise risk estimate, but if additional risk factors are known, PSA values alone are less accurate.     

The role of the complexed-to-total prostate-specific antigen ratio in predicting the final pathological stage of clinically localized prostate cancer

OBJECTIVES: To examine the association between the complexed-to-total (C:T) prostate-specific antigen (PSA) ratio and prostate cancer pathological stage to assess whether the C:T PSA ratio may predict the final pathological stage in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a prospective study, 101 men with clinically localized prostate cancer underwent a staging pelvic lymphadenectomy and radical prostatectomy. Total PSA (tPSA) and PSA complexed to alpha(1)-antichymotrypsin (cPSA) were measured from preoperative plasma and were correlated with the clinical and pathological stage, and with surgical margin status. The pathological stage was determined as organ-confined (n=59) and extracapsular extension (n=42). RESULTS: The distributions of tPSA and cPSA were significantly different in men with locally confined and those with locally extended disease. This finding was not observed for the C:T PSA ratio. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve to predict the final pathological stage was significantly greater for tPSA (0.684) and cPSA (0.677) than for the C:T PSA ratio (p<0.032). TPSA (0.685) and cPSA (0.670) also showed areas under the ROC curve greater than that of the C:T PSA ratio (0.542) (p<0.05) for prediction of positive surgical margins. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that the C:T PSA ratio does not improve the performance of total PSA for predicting the final pathological stage in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer.     

Usefulness of prostate-specific antigen velocity in screening for prostate cancer

BACKGROUND: The cut-off value of prostate-specific antigen velocity (PSAV) was investigated in relation to the initial prostate-specific antigen (PSA) value in subjects with initial values of 1.0-4.0 ng/mL, and the usefulness and limitations of PSAV as a screening test for prostate cancer were examined. METHODS: In this study, 4883 men who underwent mass screening for prostate cancer two or more times between 1987 and 1998 and had initial PSA levels of 1.0-4.0 ng/mL were investigated. The subjects ranged in age from 42 to 96 years (mean: 68.0 +/- 6.6 years). The cut-off value of PSAV was set at 0.1-1.5 ng/mL per year, and the sensitivity, specificity, efficiency and positive predictive value (PPV) of PSAV for detecting prostate cancer were determined according to the initial PSA value. A similar examination of the average PSAV was carried out in 2888 subjects with three or more visits for mass screening for prostate cancer. RESULTS: The diagnostic efficiency of PSAV was optimal with cut-off values of 0.3 and 0.75 ng/mL per year in those subjects with initial PSA levels of 1.0-1.9 and 2.0-4.0 ng/mL, respectively, but the PPV was low at 1.8% in subjects with initial PSA levels of 1.0-1.9 ng/mL. When the cutoff value of PSAV was set at 1.2 ng/mL per year in individuals with initial PSA levels of 1.0-1.9 ng/mL, the PPV increased to 7.3% and the sensitivity was 40%. The diagnostic efficiency of the average PSAV was optimal at the cut-off values of 0.2 and 0.4 ng/mL per year in subjects with initial PSA levels of 1.0-1.9 and 2.0-4.0 ng/mL, respectively, but the PPV was low at 2.2% in the subjects with initial PSA values of 1.0-1.9 ng/mL. When the cut-off value of PSAV was set at 0.75 ng/mL per year in individuals with initial PSA levels of 1.0-1.9 ng/mL, the PPV was 9.8% and the sensitivity was 46%. CONCLUSION: It is possible to improve the diagnostic accuracy of prostate cancer screening using the cut-off value of PSAV and average PSAV in subjects with initial PSA levels of 1.0-4.0 ng/mL. The cut-off values of PSAV should be set at 1.2 and 0.75 ng/mL per year in individuals with initial PSA levels of 1.0-1.9 and 2.0-4.0 ng/mL, respectively. The cut-off values of the average PSAV should be set at 0.75 and 0.4 ng/mL per year in individuals with initial PSA levels of 1.0-1.9 and 2.0-4.0 ng/mL, respectively.     

Usefulness of an immunochromatographical assay, PSA Rapid Test as a primary screening test for prostate cancer

Background The recent rapid increase of mass screening for prostate cancer by measuring PSA in Japan will increase the economic burden to the healthcare system. PSA Rapid Test (PRT) is a simple inexpensive test. The usefulness of PRT as a primary screening test for prostate cancer was evaluated. Methods When we conducted educational lectures for prostate cancer in our city, screening for prostate cancer using PRT was offered to the male participants. The results of the tests were handed to participants in writing at the end of the lectures. When the results were judged as positive, letters of referral to our institute were enclosed. Results One hundred and fourteen (18.6%) of 614 men were judged as positive by PRT. Of the 114 men with positive PRT, 73 (64%) visited our institution. Finally, 37 men underwent a transrectal prostate biopsy and a diagnosis of prostate cancer was made in 21 men (3.4% of all participants). The total costs for the PSA tests in this study were summed to be approximately $2,300, while they would be approximately $9,200 if all participants had undergone screening using the conventional quantitative method from the outset. Conclusion PRT is a low-cost method to detect patients with prostate cancer. We believe the PRT is useful as an initial screening test for detecting prostate cancer and that the combination of the PRT and more precise quantitative testing would be a reasonable way to reduce the cost and achieve high detection rate.     

Serum prostate-specific antigen and digital rectal examination for early detection of prostate cancer in a national community-based program

Objectives

This study analyzed methods of prostate cancer early detection in community settings throughout the United States against standards and findings of earlier studies conducted at academic medical centers.

Methods

The study was conducted at 148 clinical centers during Prostate Cancer Awareness Week in September 1993 and continued through June 1994. A total of 31,953 eligible subjects were tested by both digital rectal examination (DRE) and prostate-specific antigen (PSA). PSA was tested with the Abbott IMx PSA assay and reported by Roche Biomedical, Inc.

Results

The study confirmed that elevated PSA levels (greater than 4.0 ng/mL) aid in the detection of organconfined prostate cancer when used in conjunction with the DRE. Reflecting more conservative biopsy decision-making practices, study results nonetheless are comparable to earlier reports. Among 1307 subjects who underwent biopsy, 322 cancers were detected. The cancer detection rate was 3.6% for PSA, 3.0% for DRE, and 4.7% if either test result was positive. The positive predictive value (PPV) for elevated PSA levels (greater than 4.0 ng/mL) was 31.6%, significantly better (P <0.0001) than the PPV for abnormal DRE results (25.5%). Nearly 90% (88.9%) of staged cancers were diagnosed as localized. Elevated PSA levels detected more localized cancers (76 of 105 [72.4%]) than the DRE (72 of 105 [68.6%]). Of localized tumors, 33 (31.4%) were missed by DRE and detected solely by PSA, and 29 (27.6%) were missed by PSA and detected solely by DRE. The combined use of the two methods detected 33 additional localized tumors.

Conclusions

Community practice throughout the United States demonstrates that PSA and DRE are consistently effective and efficient in the early detection of prostate cancer.     

Prostate-specific antigen adjusted for the transition zone volume versus free-to-total prostate-specific antigen ratio in predicting prostate cancer

BACKGROUND: We performed this study to assess the efficacy of prostate-specific antigen adjusted for the transition zone volume (PSATZ) and free-to-total prostate-specific antigen (PSA) ratio (F/T ratio) in predicting prostate cancer in men with intermediate PSA levels of 4.1-10.0 ng/mL. METHODS: Between March 1997 and September 1998, PSATZ was obtained from 67 patients who underwent ultrasonography guided systemic sextant biopsies and had a PSA of 4.1-10.0 ng/mL. PSATZ was compared with F/T ratio via receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. RESULTS: Of 67 patients, 22 (32.8%) had prostate cancer and 45 (67.2%) had benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) on pathologic examination. Mean PSA, PSA density, F/T ratio and PSATZ were 7.96+/-2.01ng/mL, 0.28+/-0.14 ng/mL/cc, 0.10+/-0.06 and 0.70+/-0.28 ng/mL/cc in patients with prostate cancer and 6.39+/-1.68 ng/mL, 0.16+/-0.06 ng/mL/cc, 0.15+/-0.05 and 0.29+/-0.10 ng/mL/cc in patients with BPH, respectively. The ROC curve analysis demonstrated that PSATZ predicted the biopsy outcome significantly better than F/T ratio in all 67 patients (P<0.01) and in a subset of 53 men with normal digital rectal examination (P<0.01). With a cut-off value of 0.35 ng/mL/cc, PSATZ had a sensitivity of 86% and a specificity of 89% for predicting prostate cancer. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that PSATZ and F/T ratio may be useful in diagnosing prostate cancer with intermediate levels of PSA. Prostate-specific antigen adjusted for the transition zone volume is more accurate than F/T ratio in distinguishing benign prostatic disease from prostate cancer. But large prospective studies are required to assess the precise role of PSATZ and F/T ratio in early prostate cancer detection.     

前列腺癌根治术后患者抗原检测焦虑心理调适的质性研究

目的 探讨前列腺癌根治术后前列腺特异性抗原检测焦虑患者的心理调适体验,为制定针对性干预策略提供参考。方法 采用描述性现象学研究方法,通过目的抽样选取12例前列腺癌根治术后前列腺特异性抗原检测焦虑患者进行半结构式深入访谈,使用Colaizzi 7步分析法整理分析访谈资料。结果 前列腺癌根治术后前列腺特异性抗原检测焦虑患者心理调适的本质为：回归正常,由3个主题以及8个亚主题组成,包括情绪调适(间歇性恐惧、周期性焦虑、获得控制感)、认知调适(疾病认知的改变、需求认识的提升)和行为调适(回避与掩饰、更健康的生活方式、参与社会行动)。结论 前列腺癌根治术后前列腺特异性抗原检测焦虑患者通过情绪、认知和行为3个方面的心理调适努力回归正常生活,医护人员应关注患者不同阶段的情绪需求变化,引导和促进患者积极的情绪、认知和行为调适,尽早回归正常生活。     

不同治疗方案与局部晚期前列腺癌患者前列腺特异性抗原进展及生存状况的Meta分析

目的 应用Meta分析探讨不同治疗方案对局部晚期前列腺癌前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)进展及生存状况的影响. 方法制订原始文献的纳入标准、剔除标准及检索策略.以优势比(OR)及其95%可信区间(95%CI)为效应尺度,应用Meta分析固定效应模型和随机效应模型对有关治疗局部晚期前列腺癌不同方案的纳入文献进行综合定量评价. 结果 符合纳入标准的8篇文献进入Meta分析,共3826例.5篇为前列腺根治性切除术(RP)联合辅助治疗与单纯用RP或不用RP进行比较,以PSA进展率为评价指标,合并后的OR值为0.86,95%CI为0.48～1.56;3篇为RP联合激素治疗与单纯用RP或不用RP进行比较,以疾病特异性死亡率为评价指标,合并后的OR值为0.72,95%CJ为0.51～1.02. 结论 RP联合辅助治疗可以显著减少局部晚期前列腺癌患者术后PSA进展,对疾病特异性死亡率却无显著影响.     

The prognostic importance of prostate specific antigen in the monitorisation of patients undergoing maximum androgen blockade for metastatic prostate cancer

Introduction The changes in serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) concentrations can be used as a prognostic factor in patients undergoing maximum androgen blockade for metastatic prostate cancer. Material and method A total of 149 patients followed up in our department were classified into 4 groups on the basis of PSA changes: group 1; those with normalisation of PSA levels within the first 3 months, group 2; those with normalisation PSA between months 3 and 6, group 3; those with a decrease in PSA but not reaching normal range, group 4; those with no decrease. The gleason scores and the number of bone metastases were also compared between the groups. Result The time to progression was significantly delayed in group 1 (mean: 23.3 months) compared to those with group 2 (mean: 16.9 months) (P < 0.02). The time to progression in group 3 (mean: 8.45 months) was significantly shorter compared to the first two groups (P < 0.001). Also, in patients with gleason scores 5–7 (grades 2) and gleason scores over 7 (grade 3) and group 1, the time to progression (mean: 21.2 months) was significantly delayed compared to those with the same gleason scores but with group 2 (mean: 13.4 months) (P < 0.001). Conclusion The decrease in PSA level is more important than gleason scores in determining the time to progression. Early normalisation of PSA delays the time to progression, and when combined with gleason scores, PSA is an important prognostic factor in predicting the success of the therapy.     

前列腺穿刺活检结果预测模型的建立

目的基于前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)等指标,建立能够预测前列腺穿刺活检结果的数学模型.方法收集2009年7月至2015年3月在解放军总医院进行前列腺穿刺活检患者的年龄、前列腺体积、游离PSA(fPSA)和总PSA(tPSA)等临床资料.所有研究对象中随机选择80％为建模组,其余20％为验证组.在建模组中利用单因素和多因素 Logistic 分析筛选出预测前列腺癌的独立性影响因素,构建回归方程,并以此为基础建立预测前列腺穿刺结果的数学模型.利用受试者工作特征(receiver operating characteristic,ROC)曲线评估该模型对前列腺癌的诊断价值,并与临床常用的 PSA 及其相关参数比较诊断价值的差异.结果选取资料完整且 tPSA 100 ng/ml以下的患者纳入研究,共958例.其中建模组767例(tPSA 4~20 ng/ml者587例),验证组191例.在建模组中,将所有指标纳入单因素和多因素 Logistic 回归分析,发现年龄、tPSA 和前列腺体积是前列腺癌独立的预测因素.将所有指标(包括 fPSA)纳入回归方程,构建数学模型Y＝－4．765＋0.074×(年龄)＋0．057×(tPSA)＋0．052×(fPSA)－0．029×(前列腺体积).在建模组和验证组中, ROC曲线分析显示该模型预测前列腺癌的 ROC 曲线下面积高于 tPSA、f/tPSA 和 PSA 密度.取Y＝－0．076,即约登指数最大值作为本模型最佳临界值,预测前列腺癌的灵敏度为76．2％、特异度为76．6％、阳性预测值76．5％、阴性预测值76．3％.结论本预测模型与单独应用PSA及其相关参数相比具有更高的诊断价值,并且可以在不增加患者检查项目的前提下提高预测前列腺癌的能力.     

Evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging-based prostate-specific antigen density of the prostate in the diagnosis of prostate cancer

OBJECTIVES: We evaluated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density of the prostatic volume (PSAD) estimated using transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS; TRUS-based PSAD), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI; MRI-based PSAD), and PSA density of the transition zone (TZ) volume (PSATZD) estimated using MRI (MRI-based PSATZD) in the diagnosis of prostate cancer (PCa). METHODS: One hundred and twenty patients, who were suspected to have PCa based on PSA, ranged between 4.1 and 20.0 ng/mL were enrolled in this study. RESULTS: The prostatic volume estimated using TRUS was smaller than the volume estimated using MRI by 11.4% in the patients with PSA levels ranging 4.1-20.0 ng/mL, 7.2% in those 4.1-10.0 ng/mL, and 15.7% in those 10.1-20.0 ng/mL, respectively. PSA levels were correlated with the prostatic volume estimated using TRUS and MRI, and TZ volume estimated using MRI in the patients without PCa; however, the level was not correlated with them in the patients with PCa. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of MRI-based PSAD was higher than that of TRUS-based PSAD; however, there was no statistical difference. Stepwise logistic regression analysis for the prediction of PCa by using PSA-related parameters confirmed that MRI-based PSATZD was the most significant predictor in patients with PSA levels in the range of 4.1-20.0 ng/mL (P < 0.001), the range of 4.1-10.0 ng/mL (P = 0.002), and the range of 10.1-20.0 ng/mL (P < 0.001), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The prostatic volume estimated using TRUS was smaller than the volume estimated using MRI. MRI-based PSATZD is the most significant predictor in the four parameters.     

Three-tesla magnetic resonance-guided prostate biopsy in men with increased prostate-specific antigen and repeated, negative, random, systematic, transrectal ultrasound biopsies: detection of clinically significant prostate cancers

Background

Patients with elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and one or more previous negative transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) biopsy sessions are subject to diagnostic uncertainty due to TRUS-biopsy undersampling. Magnetic resonance (MR)–guided biopsy (MRGB) has shown high prostate cancer (PCa)–detection rates in studies with limited patient numbers.

Objective

Determine the detection rate of (clinically significant) PCa for MRGB of cancer-suspicious regions (CSRs) on 3-T multiparametric MR imaging (MP-MRI) in patients with elevated PSA and one or more negative TRUS-biopsy sessions.

Design, setting, and participants

Of 844 patients who underwent 3-T MP-MRI in our referral centre between March 2008 and February 2011, 438 consecutive patients with a PSA >4.0 ng/ml and one negative TRUS-biopsy session or more were included. MRGB was performed in 265 patients. Exclusion criteria were existent PCa, endorectal coil use, and MP-MRI for indications other than cancer detection.

Intervention

Patients underwent MRGB of MP-MRI CSRs.

Measurements

(Clinically significant) MRGB cancer-detection rates were determined. Clinically significant cancer was defined by accepted (i.a. Epstein and d’Amico) criteria based on PSA, Gleason score, stage, and tumour volume. Follow-up PSA and histopathology were collected. Sensitivity analysis was performed for patients with MP-MRI CSRs without MRGB.

Results and limitations

In a total of 117 patients, cancer was detected with MRGB (n = 108) or after negative MRGB (n = 9). PCa was detected in 108 of 438 patients (25%) and in 41% (108 of 265) of MRGB patients. The majority of detected cancers (87%) were clinically significant. Clinically significant cancers were detected in seven of nine (78%) negative MRGB patients in whom PCa was detected during follow-up. Sensitivity analysis resulted in increased cancer detection (47–56%). Complications occurred in 0.2% of patients (5 of 265).

Conclusions

In patients with elevated PSA and one or more negative TRUS-biopsy sessions, MRGB of MP-MRI CSRs had a PCa-detection rate of 41%. The majority of detected cancers were clinically significant (87%).     

Adenoid cystic carcinoma of the prostate: A case report with immunohistochemical and in situ hybridization staining for prostate-specific antigen

A 43-year-old man with urinary outlet obstruction was referred to our hospital. A digital rectal examination revealed an elastic hard prostate. The serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA), serum prostatic acid phosphate and gamma-seminoprotein levels were found to be within the normal range, and transrectal ultrasound sonography provided normal findings. The patient underwent a subcapsular prostatectomy under a diagnosis of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Histopathologically, the lesion was diagnosed as an adenoid cystic carcinoma of the prostate. Because a further examination revealed a pathologic extension into the urinary bladder, a radical cystoprostatectomy was performed. The expression of PSA protein and PSA mRNA was studied by means of immunohistochemistry and an in situ hybridization technique. The adenoid cystic carcinoma in the patient did not show any positive signs for PSA protein or PSA mRNA.