In situ human papillomavirus (HPV) genotyping of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in South African and British patients: evidence for putative HPV integration in vivo.

In South Africa asymptomatic wart virus infection diagnosed by morphological criteria occurs in 16-20% of all ethnic groups; the incidence in black women is 66%. To identify human papillomavirus (HPV) types the prevalence of HPV in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) in South African women (n = 72) with age matched British women (n = 73) was compared by non-isotopic in situ hybridisation (NISH) using digoxigenin labelled probes for HPV 6, 11, 16, 18, 31, 33 and 35 on archival biopsy specimens. A higher proportion of British biopsy specimens (68%) contained HPV than those from South Africa (50%) in CIN 2 and 3; this difference was due to HPV 16. Thirty six per cent of the positive biopsy specimens from South African women also contained HPV 33/35 compared with 16% in the United Kingdom. There was no difference in HPV detection with age in either group. These data indicate that HPV types vary geographically, with "minor" HPV types being more common in South Africa. Three qualitatively distinct NISH signals were observed; a diffuse (type 1) signal in superficial cells, mainly koilocytes; a punctate signal (type 2) in basal/"undifferentiated" cells in CIN 3; and combined type 1 and 2 signals in CIN with wart virus infection (type 3). The punctate signal may represent HPV integration.     

High-risk HPV detection and concurrent HPV 16 and 18 typing with Abbott RealTime High Risk HPV test

BackgroundHigh-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) is the causative agent of cervical cancer. Among the high-risk types, infection with HPV 16 and 18 is associated with significantly higher risk of disease progression, and consequently these two types together cause approximately 70% of invasive cervical cancer worldwide. Identification of HPV 16 and HPV 18 can provide valuable information for risk stratification and clinical management of patients infected with these two types in both ASC-US triage and primary screening in women over age 30. It may also be valuable in the assessment of HPV vaccine efficacy. Abbott RealTime High Risk (HR) HPV is a recently developed test for the detection of 14 high-risk HPV types with the ability to concurrently identify HPV 16 and 18.ObjectiveTo evaluate the clinical performance of Abbott RealTime HR HPV test. Study design: Abbott RealTime HR HPV was evaluated with 253 cervical specimens obtained from patients with CIN 3 and 340 specimens from patients with cervical cancer to determine clinical sensitivity of the test and the prevalence of types 16 and 18. Additionally, 757 cervical specimens obtained from women 30 years of age or older with normal cytology in a general screening population were tested to determine high-risk HPV positivity rate.ResultsThe Abbott RealTime HR HPV test detected 97.2% (246/253) of CIN 3 specimens and 98.5% (335/340) of cancer specimens. HPV 16 was the most prevalent type in both CIN 3 (72.8%) and cancer specimens (64.5%). HPV 16 and 18 combined were detected in 78.9% of high-risk HPV positive CIN 3 and 84.8% of high-risk HPV positive cancer specimens. In specimens from women 30 years of age or older with normal cytology in a screening population, the HPV positivity rate was 6.5% (49/757).ConclusionsAbbott RealTime HR HPV is a highly sensitive test for detection of high-grade cervical disease and cancer. The HPV 16 and HPV 18 typing capability of the test offers the advantage of stratifying patients at greater risk of progression and may thus aid in better patient care and management.     

Comparative Evaluation of Three Commercial Systems for Detection of High-Risk Human Papillomavirus in Cervical and Vaginal ThinPrep PreservCyt Samples and Correlation with Biopsy Results

Genital human papillomavirus (HPV) is the etiologic agent of more than 99% of all cervical cancers worldwide, with 14 genotypes being considered oncogenic or “high risk” because of their association with severe dysplasia and cervical carcinoma. Among these 14 high-risk types, HPV-16 and -18 account for approximately 70% of cervical cancers. The aim of this study was to evaluate three FDA-approved HPV nucleic acid-based tests for the ability to predict high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasias (CIN2 or worse) in corresponding tissue biopsy specimens. Residual specimens (total n = 793, cervical n = 743, vaginal n = 50) collected in ThinPrep PreservCyt medium with a cytologic result of ≥atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance were tested by the Hybrid Capture 2 (HC2) assay (Qiagen, Gaithersburg, MD), the cobas HPV test (Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN), and the APTIMA HPV assay (Hologic, San Diego, CA). Genotyping for HPV-16 and HPV-18 was simultaneously performed by the cobas HPV test. Results were compared to cervical or vaginal biopsy findings, when they were available (n = 350). Among the 350 patients with corresponding biopsy results, 81 (23.1%) showed ≥CIN2 by histopathology. The ≥CIN2 detection sensitivity was 91.4% by the cobas and APTIMA assays and 97.5% by HC2 assay. The specificities of the cobas, APTIMA, and HC2 assays were 31.2, 42.0, and 27.1%, respectively. When considering only positive HPV-16 and/or HPV-18 genotype results, the cobas test showed a sensitivity and a specificity of 51.9 and 86.6%, respectively. While the HC2, cobas, and APTIMA assays showed similar sensitivities for the detection of ≥CIN2 lesions, the specificities of the three tests varied, with the greatest specificity (86.6%) observed when the HPV-16 and/or HPV-18 genotypes were detected.     

Human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA copy number is dependent on grade of cervical disease and HPV type

The association between human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA copy number and cervical disease was investigated. Viral DNA copy number for the most common high-risk HPV types in cervical cancer (types 16, 18, 31, and 45) was determined in cervical cytobrush specimens from 149 women with high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasias (CIN II-CIN III), 176 with low-grade CIN (CIN I), and 270 with normal cytology. Quantitative, PCR-based fluorescent assays for each of the HPV genotypes and for the beta-globin gene were used. The amount of cellular DNA increased significantly with increasing disease; thus, HPV was expressed as copies per microgram of cellular DNA. The assay had a dynamic range of >10(7), allowing documentation for the first time of the wide range of HPV copy numbers seen in clinical specimens. Median HPV DNA copy number varied by more than 10(4) among the viral types. HPV16 was present in the highest copy number; over 55% of HPV16-positive samples contained more than 10(8) copies/microgram. Median copy number for HPV16 showed dramatic increases with increasing epithelial abnormality, an effect not seen with the other HPV types. HPV16 increased from a median of 2.2 x 10(7) in patients with normal cytology, to 4.1 x 10(7) in CIN I patients, to 1.3 x 10(9) copies/microgram in CIN II-III patients. Even when stratified by cervical disease and viral type, the range of viral DNA copies per microgram of cellular DNA was quite large, precluding setting a clinically significant cutoff value for "high" copy numbers predictive of disease. This study suggests that the clinical usefulness of HPV quantitation requires reassessment and is assay dependent.     

Human papillomavirus genotyping as a predictor of high-grade cervical dysplasia in women with mildly cytologic abnormalities: a two-year follow-up report

High-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) DNA testing has emerged as another testing modality for women with mildly cytologic abnormalities. We conducted a two-year follow-up study of 108 women with mildly abnormal cervical cytology for detection of CIN 2/3. A cervical swab sample was obtained for HPV genotyping by a HPV blot and histologic follow-up results were correlated with HR-HPV types. Of the 108 cases, 93 (86.1%) were positive for HR-HPV DNA. HPV-16 was detected in 45.1% of patients. CIN grade 2 or 3 was confirmed in 25 (23.1%) of the 108 women during the two-year follow-up period. The two-year cumulative incidence rates of CIN 2/3 were 38.6% (17/44) among HPV-16- positive women, but only 5.6% among HR-HPV-positive women without HPV-16 or HPV-18. The sensitivity of a positive HPV-16 test for CIN 2/3 was 68.0%, the specificity was 67.5%. Our results demonstrated that the type-specific HPV-16 test increased sensitivity of detecting high-grade cervical dysplasia for women who have mildly cytologic abnormalities. The implication of the present findings is that HPV genotyping may identify women with the greatest risk of high-grade CIN.     

Episomal and integrated human papillomavirus in cervical neoplasia shown by non-isotopic in situ hybridisation.

It was postulated that non-isotopic in situ hybridisation (NISH) signal types 1-3 for human papillomavirus in cervical biopsy specimens represent episomal or integrated virus. The aim of this study was to validate this hypothesis by independent molecular techniques. Fresh cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) and squamous cell cancer (SCC) tissue were examined for NISH signal pattern by hybridising with digoxigenin labelled HPV 16. DNA was extracted from the same samples and analysed by restriction endonuclease digestion and Southern blotting to determine the physical state of the viral genome. Six CIN biopsy specimens showed a type 1 NISH signal for HPV 16. On Southern analysis these biopsy specimens contained only episomal HPV 16. Three SCC with a type 2 NISH signal contained integrated HPV 16 by Southern analysis. Two specimens, a CIN 3 and an SCC with a type 3 NISH signal for HPV 16, showed the presence of both episomal and integrated HPV 16 with conventional Southern analysis and two dimensional gel electrophoresis. These results show that episomal HPV can be reliably determined by NISH type 1 signal, integrated HPV by type 2, and a combination of both episomal and integrated HPV, by a type 3 signal in archival paraffin wax embedded cervical biopsy specimens. This will add another variable to the epidemiological studies of HPV infection. In particular, it will now allow retrospective studies to be done to define the role of episomal and integrated HPV in the evolution of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and other cervical disease associated with this virus.     

Detection of human papillomavirus DNA in genital lesions by using a modified commercially available in situ hybridization assay.

A modified, commercially available DNA-DNA in situ hybridization test that uses biotinylated probes for the identification of human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA types 6/11, 16/18, and 31/33/35 was evaluated. HPV DNA was detected in 314 of 787 (40%) histologically abnormal genital biopsy specimens by using the ViraType in situ assay (Life Technologies, Gaithersburg, Md.), in which the hybridization time was increased from 2 to 16 h. Ninety percent of positive condyloma acuminata specimens contained HPV type 6/11 DNA. The prevalences of HPV DNA for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia I, II, and III lesions by this in situ hybridization test were 42, 54, and 55%, respectively. The combined prevalence of HPV type 16/18 and 31/33/35 DNAs increased with the severity of the lesion, while the prevalence of type 6/11 DNA decreased. HPV type 6/11 DNA was found only in 1 of 16 (6%) positive cervical intraepithelial neoplasia III specimens. HPV type 16/18 and 31/33/35 DNA was detected in 11 of 16 (69%) and 4 of 16 (25%) in situ hybridization-positive cervical intraepithelial neoplasia III specimens, respectively. Thus, the observation that certain "higher-risk" HPV genotypes are associated with upper-grade cervical precancer lesions was confirmed by this commercial hybridization system. In general, the assay was found to be well suited for use in the clinical laboratory. The ViraType in situ procedure modified for a longer hybridization time may be helpful in identifying lesions containing higher-risk HPV strains.     

Evaluation of two commercially available nucleic acid hybridization assays for the detection and typing of human papillomavirus in clinical specimens.

Southern blot (Oncor, Gaithersburg, MD) and dot blot (Life Technologies, Gaithersburg, MD) nucleic acid hybridization assays were compared for their ability to detect and type human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA in 50 cervical swab specimens and 11 biopsy specimens. Overall agreement between the two methods was 78.7%. With the use of Southern blot analysis, HPV 6, 11, 16, or 18 was detected in 22 specimens, however, 4 were untypable because of abnormal or smeared band patterns. Dot blot analysis detected HPV 6/11, 16/18, or 31/33/35 in those same 22 specimens and in 9 additional specimens. Eight of the 13 specimens in which HPV was not detected or untypable by Southern blot contained type 31/33/35 by dot blot. Based on convenience of specimen collection and transport, ease of performance and the ability to detect HPV types 31, 33, and 35, the authors are currently using the dot blot assay for the detection and typing of HPV in clinical specimens.     

Human papillomavirus (HPV) genotyping using paired exfoliated cervicovaginal cells and paraffin-embedded tissues to highlight difficulties in attributing HPV types to specific lesions

Defining type-specific human papillomavirus (HPV) infections within cervical tissues is important for understanding the pathogenesis of cervical neoplasia and assessing the effectiveness of prophylactic vaccines with limited type-specific spectra. We compared HPV DNA-testing results from 146 matched exfoliated-cell and formalin-fixed-tissue specimens collected by cervicovaginal lavage (CVL) within 90 days of each other from women with histologically confirmed cervical intraepithelial lesions (CIN). The CVL specimens were HPV typed using a MY09/11 L1 consensus primer PCR method followed by dot blot hybridization. The tissue specimens were HPV typed using an SPF(10) line probe assay HPV detection system. Of the 146 specimen pairs with evidence of CIN in the tissue, 91.8% were positive for one or more HPV types in both the tissue and cellular specimens. Tissue sections were more likely to be HPV negative (P < 0.01). Typing directly from tissue sections resolved multiple infections detected in exfoliated cells to a single HPV type in only 46.9% of cases. Combined use of both specimen types to attribute lesions to HPV type 16 (HPV-16) and/or -18 led to 43.1% attributed to HPV-16 and/or -18 by both specimen types and 19.9% attributed to HPV-16 and/or -18 by one, but not both, specimen types. Unambiguous attribution of cervical lesions to a single, specific HPV type remains a difficult proposition. Use of multiple specimen types or the development of highly sensitive and robust in situ hybridization HPV-testing methods to evaluate the certainty of attribution of lesions to HPV types might provide insights in future efforts, including HPV vaccine trials.     

Typing of human papillomaviruses in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 biopsies from Cape Town

DNA from 98 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 (CIN 3) biopsies was screened, using the Southern blotting hybridization technique, for human papillomavirus (HPV) types 6, 11, 16, 18, 31, 33, and 35. HPV 16 was detected in 16 biopsies (16%), HPV 33 in eight biopsies (8%), HPV 31 in two biopsies (2%), and HPV 18 in one biopsy (1%). One of the biopsies contained both HPV 31 and 18. Six biopsies (6%) contained an HPV type very similar but not identical to HPV 16, and 35 biopsies were positive for HPV, but the Pst 1 restriction fragments were distinct from any of the HPV types used as probes. HPV was not detected in 32% (32/98) of the biopsies screened.     

The relationship of community biopsy-diagnosed cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 to the quality control pathology-reviewed diagnoses: an ALTS report

We examined the predictors (cytologic interpretations, pathology review, human papillomavirus [HPV] testing results, and colposcopic impressions) of precancer among 545 women with clinical center biopsy diagnoses of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2 in the ASCUS LSIL Triage Study. Among women with a CIN 2 biopsy result, there was an increasing likelihood that the loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) tissue sample was diagnosed as precancer (CIN 3) with an increasing number of clinical risk factors of cervical precancer (high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion [HSIL] cytology, high-grade colposcopy, detection of HPV type 16; Ptrend < .0005). In a multivariate model, using a case definition of worst histologic diagnosis made by the quality control pathology review of biopsy and LEEP tissue samples, HPV-16 was positively associated (odds ratio [OR], 4.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.6-8.8) with a CIN 3 diagnosis, whereas testing negative for HPV or positive for noncarcinogenic HPV types was negatively associated (OR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.14-0.75) with a CIN 3 diagnosis. Although we found clear evidence that HPV-16 detection helped clarify whether a biopsy specimen diagnosed as CIN 2 represented HPV infection or cervical precancer, this relationship was not sufficiently robust to be clinically useful for reducing the overtreatment of women with HPV infection.     

Comparison of HPV detection technologies: Hybrid capture 2, PreTect HPV-Proofer and analysis of HPV DNA viral load in HPV16, HPV18 and HPV33 E6/E7 mRNA positive specimens

Human papillomavirus (HPV) testing using molecular methods in liquid based cytology (LBC) specimens may be useful as an adjunct to cervical screening by cytology. We compared the positivity rate of the commercially available HPV DNA method hybrid capture 2 (hc2) and the commercially available E6/E7 mRNA method PreTect HPV-Proofer in cytological specimens (n=299). LBC specimens collected (n=299) represented the following cervical cytological disease categories: Normal (n=60), borderline nuclear abnormalities (BNA) (n=34), CIN1 (n=121), CIN2 (n=60), CIN3 (n=24). Overall, 69% (205/299) of the cases were positive by hc2 and 38% (112/299) of the cases were positive by PreTect HPV-Proofer. Concordance rates between the two tests were highest in the high-grade cytology cases (CIN2: 67% and CIN3: 83%) and the normal cytology cases (88%) and lowest in the BNA and CIN1 categories (56% and 52%). HPV DNA viral load analyses were carried out on HPV16 (n=55), HPV18 (n=9) and HPV33 (n=13) samples that were positive by PreTect HPV-Proofer. The sensitivity and specificity of PreTect HPV-Proofer and the hc2 DNA test for the detection of high-grade cytology (i.e. CIN2+) were 71.4% and 75.8% vs 100% and 43.7%, respectively. The relatively low detection rate observed by PreTect HPV-Proofer in the whole range of cytological positive cases, combined with a relatively higher specificity and PPV, suggests that PreTect HPV-Proofer may be more useful than hc2 for triage and in predicting high-grade disease.     

Extended human papillomavirus genotype distribution in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and cancer: Analysis of 40 352 cases from a large academic gynecologic center in China

Our aim was to conduct a large epidemiologic analysis of the distribution of human papilloma virus (HPV) genotypes associated with cervical neoplasias and cancers at a major Chinese gynecologic center. The pathologic database was searched for cervical histopathologic diagnoses with prior HPV genotyping from liquid cervical cytology specimens obtained ≤6 months before biopsy. HPV testing was performed by using the Tellgenplex HPV27 or YanengBio HPV23 genotyping assays. A total of 40 352 cases meeting study criteria were identified. High risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) was detected in 94.1% of squamous cancers compared to in only 83.3% of cervical adenocarcinomas. The prevalence of multiple HPV infections was highest in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 1 (CIN1) (33.8%) and decreased with increasing severity of squamous lesions. The distribution of HPV genotypes was similar between CIN1 and histopathologic-negative cases. HPV16 was one of the three most common hrHPV genotypes before all histopathologic abnormalities, ranging from 72.0% for cervical cancers, 38.7% for CIN2/3/AIS, 13.1% for CIN1, and 9.1% for biopsy-negative cases. HPV16 and HPV18 accounted for over 87.2% of detected hrHPV genotypes for all glandular intraepithelial neoplastic lesions and cancers, whereas squamous lesions did not show this pattern. 80.3% of cervical cancers were associated with genotypes covered by HPV16/18 vaccines and 89.6% with genotypes covered by 9-valent vaccination.     

High prevalence of HPV 16 in South African women with cancer of the cervix and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia

Despite the high prevalence of cervical cancer and cervical neoplasias in South Africa, few studies have been performed in this region to establish which human papillomavirus (HPV) types are associated with the development of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia lesions and cervical cancer. To investigate these prevalence rates, punch biopsies were obtained from 56 women with cervical cancer and 141 women with histologically diagnosed cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 or 3 lesions. Nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using consensus degenerate PCR primers was performed for the detection of HPV DNA and HPV typing was done by restriction fragment length polymorphism. Forty-seven (94%) of the cervical cancer and 114 (88%) of the cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2/3 biopsies were positive for HPV DNA. The prevalence rates of the HPV types detected in the cervical cancer biopsies were HPV 16 (82%), HPV 18, (10%), HPV 33 (10%), HPV 31 (2%), HPV 58 (2%), HPV 35 (2%), and HPV 59 (2%). The cervical intraepithelial neoplasia lesions contained HPV 16 (56.6%), HPV 33 (14%), HPV 31 (10.9%), HPV X (7%), HPV 52 (3.9), HPV 58 (3.1%), HPV 35 (2.3%), HPV 18 (1.6%), HPV 11 (0.8%). Five of the nine fragments that were not typed by the RFLP, designated HPV-X, were sequenced to give HPV6 (1/5), HPV 26 (2/5), HPV 68 (1/5), and candHPV 87 (1/5). HPV 58 was detected in one cervical cancer biopsy and four biopsies from cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 lesions and was shown to be a previously described variant [Williamson and Rybicki (1991) J. Med. Virol. 33:165-171]. In addition, a cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 lesion was shown to harbour HPV type HAN2294 (cand HPV 87). The results of this study indicate that cervical cancer and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2/3 are largely associated with HPV 16 infection in this group of South African women and, therefore, an effective HPV 16 based vaccine should prevent the development of cervical cancer in a large proportion of women from this region of South Africa.     

Human papillomavirus infection of the uterine cervix. Tissue sampling and laboratory methods affect correlations between infection rates and dysplasia.

Two common tissue sampling techniques--colposcopic biopsy and cervical scrape--and two common human papillomavirus (HPV) detection techniques--Southern blot and dot blot (SB and ViraPap [VP])--were compared to determine whether differences in these techniques alter correlations between "oncogenic" HPVs and cervical neoplasia. In 87 women with persistently abnormal Papanicolaou (Pap) smears, concurrent biopsy and scrape specimens contained HPV in 21 (24%) and contained no HPV in 26 (30%); 30 scrape specimens (34.5%) tested positive when the biopsy tested negative and 10 (11.5%) scrape specimens tested negative when the biopsy tested positive (overall concordance, 54%). Concordance for the most prevalent HPVs (16/18) was 59%. In carcinoma in situ, HPV was found in biopsy samples significantly more frequently than in scrape specimens: 17 of 23 (75%) biopsy samples versus 9 of 23 (39%) scrape specimens (P = 0.018). Conversely, in mild or no dysplasia, 0 of 42 biopsy samples tested positive for HPV 16/18 compared with 12 of 42 scrape specimens (29%; P = 0.0001). Of 229 specimens analyzed by SB and VP, 43 (19%) tested positive and 148 (65%) tested negative for HPV by both methods (concordance, 84%). Corroborative results indicated that 29 of 35 (83%) VP-positive SB-negative results were truly positive compared with none of three SB-positive VP-negative results. Both the cervical sampling technique and the method for HPV detection can significantly affect statistical correlations between cervical dysplasia and HPV type.     

Distribution of 14 high risk HPV types in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia detected by a non-radioactive general primer PCR mediated enzyme immunoassay.

AIM: To evaluate the presence of high risk human papillomaviruses (HPV) in cervical smears showing intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN). METHODS: The presence of 14 high risk HPV was evaluated in 114 cervical smears with CIN of different degrees, by comparing a non-radioactive polymerase chain reaction (PCR) enzyme immunoassay (EIA) with conventional PCR followed by radioactive Southern blot hybridisation. General primer PCR amplicons detecting low risk and high risk HPV were typed for 14 different high risk HPV types (HPV 16, 18, 31, 33, 35, 39, 45, 51, 52, 56, 58, 59, 66, and 68) by a non-radioactive PCR-EIA. Virus load of HPV 16 positive CIN was assessed using the semiquantitative PCR-EIA. RESULTS: Histological evaluation confirmed CIN I in 49 cases (mean age 29.0 years, range 17 to 52), CIN II in 31 cases (mean age 30.8 years, 18 to 54), and CIN III in 34 cases (mean age 31.1 years, 16 to 57). The non-radioactive PCR-EIA showed an overall agreement rate of 90% (kappa value 0.75) when compared with conventional general primer PCR followed by radioactive Southern blot hybridisation. High risk HPVs were detected in 47% of CIN I, 77% of CIN II, and 97% of CIN III (p < or = 0.02). HPV types 39, 51, 56, and 58 were found in CIN I exclusively (between 2% and 8%). HPV 16 and HPV 31 were detected in 12% and 2% of CIN I, 35% and 21% of CIN II, and 74% and 13% of CIN III, respectively (p < or = 0.03 and p < or = 0.04). The virus load estimated by the semiquantitative PCR-EIA of HPV 16 was similar in CIN I, CIN II, and CIN III. CONCLUSIONS: The PCR-EIA has high clinical sensitivity for detecting CIN II/III (90%). There was a significantly higher prevalence rate of HPV 16 and 31 in CIN III than in CIN I and II.     

Integration of human papillomavirus types 16 and 18 in cervical adenocarcinoma.

AIMS: To determine which type of human papillomavirus (HPV) is associated with cervical adenocarcinoma and whether the virus was integrated or episomal in two continents. METHODS: Biopsy specimens from the UK (n = 16) and South Africa (n = 22) were analysed by non-isotopic in situ hybridisation (NISH) for HPV types 6, 11, 16, 18, 31, 33, and 35 on archival biopsy specimens using digoxigenin labelled probes. RESULTS: A total of 20 adenocarcinomas (53%) from both groups contained HPV DNA. In the UK group, seven and four cases contained HPV 18 (44%) and 16 (25%) respectively. In the South African group, nine cases contained HPV 18 (41%) while HPV DNA was not detectable in the other 13 cases. Hence HPV 18 was present in 80% of HPV positive adenocarcinomas. CONCLUSIONS: The HPV 16 or 18 genome was integrated in all viral positive cases. In two cases HPV 18 was also present in an episomal form. These data indicate that HPV integration is common to cervical adenocarcinoma in two continents by the same methodology. The lower prevalence of HPV 18 detection in the South African group may have been due to the presence of other or unsequenced HPV types.     

Comparison of the AMPLICOR human papillomavirus test and the hybrid capture 2 assay for detection of high-risk human papillomavirus in women with abnormal PAP smear

Infection with human papillomavirus (HPV) is a necessary step in the progression to cervical cancer. Many methods for HPV testing are currently available, mostly developed to detect pools of HPV types. Hybrid Capture 2 (HC2) is one of the most widely used. A new PCR-based assay, the Roche AMPLICOR HPV test, has been recently developed. Both assays recognize a group of 13 HR HPV types contemporaneously. This study evaluated the performance of both methods for detecting high-grade cervical lesions as a part of management for abnormal PAP smears. The study population was composed of 213 women, all referred to colposcopy and histologic diagnosis following an abnormal PAP test. Biopsy-confirmed high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia was used as a gold standard. Overall agreement was 84.9% with a kappa value of 0.6. When comparing the ability to detect moderate cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN2+) and high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN3+/cancer), AMPLICOR proved slightly more sensitive than HC2, a finding that is important when HPV testing is used in a triage of borderline smear results. Genotyping of discordant results showed a prevalence of LR-HPV types in HC2 positive/AMPLICOR negative samples, and a similar prevalence of HR- and LR-HPV types in AMPLICOR positive/HC2 negative samples. In conclusion, the study shows that the AMPLICOR assay is more sensitive than HC2, which makes it a valid alternative for routine clinical use.     

Prevalence of HPV 16 and 18 DNA sequences in CIN III lesions of adults and adolescents

Adolescents may be more susceptible to cervical human papillomavirus (HPV) infections and may have more rapid progression of cervical intraepithelial neoplastic (CIN) lesions than adults. We evaluated Papanicolaou (Pap) smears and cervical tissue specimens from a consecutive series of 25 adolescent (age 15-20 yr) and 17 adult (age 35-40 yr) patients with a histologic diagnosis of CIN III. The study patients were all Detroit residents enrolled in a health maintenance organization (HMO) affliated with Henry Ford Hospital. The cervical tissue specimens were evaluated for HPV 6b/11, HPV 16, and HPV 18 using agarose gel electrophoresis and Southern hybridization following polymerase chain reaction (PCR) DNA amplification. While the small sample size precluded testing for statistical significance, HPV 16 and/or HPV 18 DNA was detected in specimens from 21/25 (84%) adolescents compared to 12/17 (71%) adults (odds ratio [OR] = 2.2; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.49-9.74). The relationship between adolescence and HPV infections appears to be stronger for HPV 18 and mixed HPV 16/18 infections (OR = 5.6; 95% CI = 0.7-42.4) than for HPV 16 infections (OR = 1.93; 95% CI = 0.4-8.8). None of the cervical specimens contained HPV 6b/11 DNA. Oral contraceptive (OC) use was associated with HPV infection in patients with CIN III, but there was no association between cigarette smoking and HPV infection. The effect of OC use on the relationship of age and HPV could not be evaluated due to small sample size. The effects of previous sexually transmitted disease (STD) on the relationship of age and HPV were assessed. Among women with a history of STD, there was a strong association between HPV and adolescent age (OR = 18.0; 95% CI = 1.2-260.0). Our data suggest that among women with CIN III, adolescents have a higher prevalence of certain high-risk types of HPV infections than adults. The excess is due predominantly to the higher rates of HPV 18 and mixed HPV 16/18 infections in adolescents. The positive relationship between high-risk HPV infections and young age was most evident in adolescents with a history of STD. The results from this study suggest that differences in HPV type infections may be related to the more aggressive clinical course of CIN in adolescents. © 1994 Wiley-Liss, Inc.