Long-term, open-label study of once-daily ropinirole prolonged release in early Parkinson's disease

Long-term safety and efficacy of once-daily ropinirole prolonged release (PR) were evaluated in subjects with early Parkinson's disease (PD). Subjects (n = 83) who completed one of two studies were enrolled in this open-label, multicenter, extension study, and followed for up to 78 months. Ropinirole PR was titrated/continued, and adjusted as appropriate during the maintenance phase (maximum 24 mg/day). L-dopa and other non-dopamine agonist PD medications were permitted. Safety outcomes included adverse events (AEs). Efficacy outcomes included Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) II and III scores, and Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) and Improvement (CGI-I) scores. The median duration of ropinirole PR exposure was 1,069 days. Most subjects (97.6%) reported at least one AE, most commonly (≥ 30%) nausea (42.2%), dizziness (41.0%), peripheral edema (38.6%), back pain (33.7%), and headache (31.3%). Seventeen (20.5%) subjects discontinued due to an AE. UPDRS and CGI scores indicated that the clinical status of subjects was maintained throughout the treatment period. In patients with early PD, long-term treatment with once-daily ropinirole PR was not associated with any new safety concerns, and was effective in maintaining clinical status. These results support the extended use of ropinirole PR for treatment of PD.     

PREPARED: Comparison of prolonged and immediate release ropinirole in advanced Parkinson's disease

Background: PREPARED was a randomized, parallel‐group, double‐blind, multicenter study to evaluate the efficacy of adjunctive ropinirole prolonged release (PR) versus immediate release (IR) in patients with advanced Parkinson's disease (PD). Methods: Patients received once‐daily PR (2–24 mg/d; n = 177) or three‐times‐daily IR (0.75–24 mg/d; n = 173) for 24 weeks. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients maintaining ≥20% reduction from baseline in “off” time over two consecutive visits at Week 24 last observation carried forward (LOCF). Results: At Week 24 LOCF, PR significantly increased the proportion of patients maintaining ≥20% reduction in “off” time versus IR (adjusted odds ratio: 1.82; 95% CI: 1.16, 2.86; P = 0.009). Mean (SD) doses at Week 24 LOCF were: PR, 18.6 (6.5) mg/d; IR, 10.4 (6.4) mg/d; mean (SD) reductions from baseline in levodopa (L ‐dopa) dose were –162 (226) mg and –113 (138) mg, respectively. Adverse events (AEs) were reported by 72% of patients in the PR group and 61% in the IR group; 12% and 9% of patients, respectively, withdrew from the study due to an AE, and 6% and 5%, respectively, reported serious AEs. Conclusions: Adjunctive PR provided a significantly greater improvement in symptom control in terms of the odds of achieving ≥20% maintained reduction in time spent “off” compared with IR. Interpretation may be confounded by the higher doses of PR versus IR that were achieved, in combination with lower doses of L ‐dopa by the study end. Despite dosing differences, the PR titration regimen was generally well tolerated, with an AE profile similar to that of IR. © 2011 Movement Disorder Society     

An open‐label conversion study of pramipexole to ropinirole prolonged release in Parkinson's disease

Ropinirole prolonged release (PR) is a once daily oral dopamine agonist approved for the treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD). The goal of this 4 week, open‐label study was to determine the most effective conversion ratio with the fewest adverse effects (AEs) when switching from pramipexole to ropinirole PR. Sixty patients with PD taking pramipexole were converted overnight to ropinirole PR at ratios of 1:3, 1:4, or 1:5 such that 20 consecutive subjects were enrolled in each group. Ropinirole PR dose adjustments were allowed to maintain efficacy or to reduce AEs. An overnight switch from pramipexole to ropinirole PR was found to be well tolerated and AEs were typical for a dopamine agonist. The most common AEs were worsening of PD symptoms, dizziness, somnolence, and nausea, the majority of which resolved after dose adjustments. Thirteen subjects discontinued ropinirole PR before 4 weeks. These subjects were taking a significantly greater dose of pramipexole, the majority greater than 4 mg/day, and tended to have longer disease durations. A conversion ratio of 1 mg of pramipexole to 4 mg of ropinirole PR resulted in the fewest discontinuations of ropinirole PR, the fewest dose adjustments and the largest percentage of subjects that preferred ropinirole PR. © 2009 Movement Disorder Society     

The efficacy and safety of ropinirole prolonged release tablets as adjunctive therapy in Chinese subjects with advanced Parkinson's disease: A multicenter,double-blind,randomized, placebo-controlled study

AimThe first evaluation of the efficacy and safety of ropinirole prolonged release (PR) as an adjunct to L-dopa in Chinese patients with advanced Parkinson's disease (PD) not optimally controlled with L-dopa.MethodsIn a 24-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study, subjects with advanced PD were randomized 1:1 to ropinirole PR (N = 175) or placebo (N = 170) as add-on therapy to L-dopa. Primary outcome measure was change from baseline in awake time spent “off”. Starting dose of ropinirole PR was 2 mg/day, titrated based on clinical response (maximum 24 mg/day).ResultsAt week 24, the mean dose of ropinirole PR was 11.4 mg/day with a mean reduction of L-dopa from 506.6 to 411.6 mg/day. Subjects receiving ropinirole PR experienced a significant reduction of “off” time (2.1 h) compared with placebo (0.4 h). Secondary outcome measures including hours of “on” time without troublesome dyskinesis were significantly increased in the ropinirole PR group (1.7 h) compared with placebo (0.3 h). Subjects classified as responders were significantly more frequent in the ropinirole PR (22.8%) than placebo group (2.5%). Efficacy outcomes including Unified Parkinson's disease Rating Scale and PDQ-39 subscales of mobility were significantly improved in the ropinirole PR versus placebo group. The most frequent adverse event experienced in the ropinirole PR group was dyskinesia.ConclusionsThis study demonstrated for the first time in Chinese subjects that ropinirole PR improved Parkinson's disease symptoms, permitting a reduction in L-dopa dose. The adverse events observed were consistent with the established safety profile of ropinirole, with no new safety signal identified.     

Randomized trial of IPX066, carbidopa/levodopa extended release,in early Parkinson's disease

ObjectiveIPX066 is an extended release carbidopa/levodopa formulation designed to rapidly attain and maintain therapeutic plasma concentrations for a prolonged duration, allowing dosing intervals of approximately 6 h. The objective was to assess the efficacy, safety, and impact on quality of life of IPX066 in the treatment of levodopa-naive Parkinson's disease (PD) patients.MethodsThis was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 30-week study of 381 levodopa-naïve patients assigned to placebo or IPX066 containing 145, 245 or 390 mg of levodopa administered three times daily (TID). The primary efficacy measure was change from Baseline in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) activities of daily living (Part II) + motor scores (Part III), at 30 weeks. Secondary outcome measures included UPDRS total and subscores, patient and clinician global impressions (PGI-I, CGI-I), and the Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39).ResultsAll IPX066 dosages were superior to placebo throughout the study and at 30 weeks (P < 0.0001). The mean improvement in UPDRS Parts II + III at 30 weeks compared to baseline was 11.7, 12.9, and 14.9 points for the three dosages and 0.6 points for placebo (P < 0.0001, all dosages). PDQ-39 total scores improved with IPX066 (P ≤ 0.034, all dosages). The most commonly reported adverse events with IPX066 included nausea, dizziness, and headache. No unexpected drug-related serious adverse events were reported.ConclusionIPX066 provided significant clinical benefits at the three dosages tested compared to placebo and was well tolerated in levodopa-naive PD patients. Of the dosages tested, IPX066 145 mg TID appeared to provide the best overall balance between efficacy and safety.     

A six-month multicentre,double-blind,bromocriptine-controlled study of the safety and efficacy of ropinirole in the treatment of patients with Parkinson's disease not optimally controlled by <Emphasis Type="SmallCaps">l</Emphasis>-dopa

Summary. Objectives: To compare the safety and efficacy of ropinirole and bromocriptine as adjunct therapy in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) not optimally controlled by L-dopa. Methods: A randomised, double-blind trial in which 555 patients were assigned to three treatment groups according to the level of daily dosage of L-dopa, presence of motor fluctuations, and use of dopamine agonist before study entry. Patient response was defined as at least a 20% reduction in daily L-dopa dose plus: for patients with no prior treatment and no motor fluctuations, a 20% reduction in UPDRS motor score; for patients with motor fluctuations, a 20% reduction in time spent "off"; and for patients already taking an agonist, an improvement on the CGI scale. Results: Safety assessments showed no significant differences in the two treatment groups for patients without prior dopamine-agonist therapy. In the group of patients with prior dopamine-agonist therapy, more patients reported adverse events in the ropinirole group (90% versus 79%, p < 0.001). The proportions of responders tended to be higher in ropinirole groups compared with bromocriptine groups and, in the subgroup with motor fluc-tuations, this difference was statistically significant (9.1% versus 0.0%, respectively; p < 0.05). Conclusions: Both drugs were well tolerated. In patients receiving a relatively high dose of L-dopa and requiring the addition of a dopamine agonist to control motor fluctuations or dyskinesias, ropinirole was significantly more effective than bromocriptine. Received January 31, 2001; accepted October 23, 2001     

A 52-week open-label study of the long-term safety of ropinirole in patients with restless legs syndrome

OBJECTIVE: To assess the long-term safety and efficacy of ropinirole in the treatment of patients with restless legs syndrome (RLS) over 52 weeks. METHODS: A 52-week, multicentre, open-label continuation study involving 310 patients, conducted in 11 countries. Eligible patients from four parent studies were invited to participate. At parent study entry, all patients had a score of > or =15 on the International Restless Legs Scale (IRLS). In this continuation study, all participants received ropinirole, 0.25-4.0 mg once daily, for 52 weeks. The primary study objective was to evaluate the safety of ropinirole. Efficacy was assessed by change in IRLS score, as well as by global improvements (clinical global impression [CGI] scale) and improvements in measures of sleep, work productivity, and quality of life. RESULTS: Overall, 251 (81.0%) patients completed the study. The mean ropinirole dose at study end was 1.90 mg/day. A total of 282 patients (91.3%) reported > or = 1 adverse event. For the majority of patients, the reported adverse events were mild or moderate in intensity. The most common adverse event was nausea. Adverse events led to discontinuation in 8.7% of patients. At week 52, IRLS scores improved by an average of 12.0 points from baseline, and 82.8% of patients were 'much improved' or 'very much improved' on the CGI-improvement scale. Ropinirole treatment was also associated with improvements in measures of sleep and quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: Ropinirole was well tolerated and therapeutic efficacy was maintained over 52 weeks in patients with RLS.     

Long-term efficacy and safety of aripiprazole in patients with schizophrenia, schizophreniform disorder, or schizoaffective disorder: 26-week prospective study

Aims:  To date there have been no reports of long-term efficacy of aripiprazole in Asian populations. The aim of the present study was therefore to investigate the long-term efficacy, safety and tolerability of aripiprazole in a large number of patients with schizophrenia, schizophreniform disorder, or schizoaffective disorder in Korea.
Methods:  This study was a prospective, multicenter, single-group, 26-week open study of patients with schizophrenia, schizophreniform disorder, or schizoaffective disorder. A total of 300 Korean patients participated in the study. The primary efficacy measure was the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score, and secondary efficacy measures included the PANSS positive and negative subscales, Clinical Global Impression–Severity of Illness (CGI-S). Tolerability and safety were assessed by monitoring the frequency and severity of treatment-emergent adverse events, extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS), vital signs, weight, and laboratory tests.
Results:  Aripiprazole produced rapid and significant improvements on all efficacy measures. As evidenced by PANSS total score, PANSS positive subscales and the CGI-S scores, first-episode drug-naïve patients demonstrated significantly greater efficacy relative to patients who had previously experienced one or more episodes of relapse. Aripiprazole was associated with significant decrease of serum prolactin level. The subjects showed mild weight gain.
Conclusion:  Aripiprazole is an effective antipsychotic in the long-term treatment of both positive and negative symptoms. This study extends the findings of previous long-term studies, and has found that there is no significant difference with regard to ethnicity in response to aripiprazole.     

Long-term efficacy and safety of pramipexole in advanced Parkinson's disease: results from a European multicenter trial.

A double-blind, placebo-controlled study with a subsequent open-label phase was conducted in 354 patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) and motor fluctuations under individually adjusted therapy with levodopa. During the double-blind phase 174 patients received pramipexole and 180 placebo. In agreement with previous studies, pramipexole treatment improved UPDRS sum scores of parts II and III by 30% and off times by approximately 2.5 hours per day. Differences between the treatment groups became significant at a daily dose of 0.75 mg of pramipexole dihydrochloride. We, furthermore, performed post hoc analyses with respect to resting tremor and depression. Patients with pronounced resting tremor derived a clear benefit from pramipexole treatment compared with placebo. In addition, pramipexole significantly improved the subitems motivation/initiative and depression in a subpopulation with increased Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale I scores at the time of inclusion. There were 262 patients who were subsequently enrolled into the open-label study featuring a maximum duration of up to 57 months. Statistical analysis revealed good long-term efficacy and tolerability of pramipexole. Overall, only a low prevalence of somnolence was found. In summary, this study provides additional level I evidence of the usefulness of pramipexole, suggests a particular tremorlytic and a possible antidepressant action of this compound, and addresses for the first time its efficacy and safety during long-term administration in advanced PD.     

Determination of minimal clinically important change in early and advanced Parkinson's disease

Two common primary efficacy outcome measures in Parkinson's disease (PD) are change in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) scores in early PD and change in “off” time in patients with motor fluctuations. Defining the minimal clinically important change (MCIC) in these outcome measures is important to interpret the clinical relevance of changes observed in clinical trials and other situations. We analyzed data from 2 multicenter, placebo‐controlled, randomized clinical trials of rasagiline; TEMPO studied 404 early PD subjects, and PRESTO studied 472 levodopa‐treated subjects with motor fluctuations. An anchor‐based approach using clinical global impression of improvement (CGI‐I) was used to determine MCIC for UPDRS scores and daily “off” time. MCIC was defined as mean change in actively treated subjects rated minimally improved on CGI‐I. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves defined optimal cutoffs discriminating between changed and unchanged subjects. MCIC for improvement in total UPDRS score (parts I–III) in early PD was determined to be ?3.5 points based on mean scores and ?3.0 points based on ROC curves. In addition, we found an MCIC for reduction in “off” time of 1.0 hours as defined by mean reduction in “off” time in active treated subjects self‐rated as minimally improved on CGI‐I minus mean reduction in “off” time in placebo‐treated subjects self‐rated as unchanged (1.9–0.9 hours). We hypothesize that many methodological factors can influence determination of the MCIC, and a range of values is likely to emerge from multiple studies. © 2011 Movement Disorder Society     

Randomized,double‐blind,multicenter evaluation of pramipexole extended release once daily in early Parkinson's disease

The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pramipexole extended release (ER) administered once daily in early Parkinson's disease (PD). Pramipexole immediate release (IR) administered three times daily (TID) is an efficacious and generally well‐tolerated treatment for PD. A pramipexole ER formulation is now available. We performed a randomized, double‐blind, placebo and active comparator–controlled trial in subjects with early PD. The primary efficacy and safety evaluation of pramipexole ER compared with placebo took place at week 18. Two hundred fifty‐nine subjects were randomized 2:2:1 to treatment with pramipexole ER once daily, pramipexole IR TID, or placebo. Levodopa rescue was required by 7 subjects in the placebo group (14%), 3 subjects in the pramipexole ER group (2.9%, P = 0.0160), and 1 subject in the pramipexole IR group (1.0%, P = 0.0017). Adjusted mean [standard error (SE)] change in Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) II [activities of daily living (ADL)] + III (motor) scores from baseline to week 18, including post‐levodopa rescue evaluations, was ?5.1 (1.3) in the placebo group, ?8.1 (1.1) in the pramipexole ER group (P = 0.0282), and ?8.4 (1.1) in the pramipexole IR group (P = 0.0153). Adjusted mean (SE) change in UPDRS ADL + motor scores, censoring post‐levodopa rescue data, was ?2.7 (1.3) in the placebo group, ?7.4 (1.1) in the pramipexole ER group (P = 0.0010), and ?7.5 (1.1) in the pramipexole IR group (P = 0.0006). Adverse events more common with pramipexole ER than placebo included somnolence, nausea, constipation, and fatigue. Pramipexole ER administered once daily was demonstrated to be efficacious compared with placebo and provided similar efficacy and tolerability as pramipexole IR administered TID. © 2010 Movement Disorder Society     

Efficacy and safety of non-ergot dopamine-receptor agonists as an adjunct to levodopa in advanced Parkinson's disease: A network meta-analysis

Background and purpose

Non-ergot dopamine agonists (NEDAs) have been used as an adjunct therapy to levodopa in advanced Parkinson's disease (PD) for many years. However, there is no strong evidence that a given NEDA is more potent than another. To compare and rank the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of six commonly used NEDAs as an adjunct to levodopa in advanced PD, which includes long-acting and standard formulations, a network meta-analysis was performed.

Methods

The MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Wanfang databases were searched from January 1996 to June 2022 for eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Six NEDAs, including rotigotine transdermal patch, ropinirole immediate-release (IR)/prolonged-release (PR), pramipexole IR/extended-release (ER), and piribedil, were investigated.

Results

A total of 34 RCTs (7868 patients) were included in the current study. The surface under the cumulative ranking curve indicated that ropinirole PR was associated with the best improvement in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS)-II, UPDRS-III, and UPDRS-II + III (0.811, 0.742, and 0.827). For OFF time reduction, pramipexole IR ranked first (0.979), and ropinirole PR ranked first in OFF time responder rate (0.927). Pramipexole ER ranked first in overall withdrawals, and rotigotine transdermal patch ranked first in the incidence of adverse events (≥1 AEs).

Conclusions

This network meta-analysis suggests six commonly used NEDAs are effective as an adjunct to levodopa in advanced PD. In comprehensive consideration of better symptomatic management, ropinirole PR may be a better choice than other NEDAs in advanced PD. Six NEDAs showed different profiles of AEs.     

Long-term safety and tolerability of rotigotine transdermal system in patients with early-stage idiopathic Parkinson's disease: a prospective, open-label extension study

PurposeThis prospective, open-label extension (SP702; NCT00594165) of a 6-month double-blind, randomized study investigated the long-term safety and tolerability of rotigotine transdermal system in early Parkinson’s disease (PD).MethodsPatients with early-stage idiopathic PD received transdermal rotigotine for up to 6 years at optimal dose (up to 16 mg/24 h). Adjunctive levodopa was allowed. Primary outcomes included adverse events (AEs) and extent of rotigotine exposure. Other outcomes included time to levodopa, incidence of dyskinesias, and efficacy using the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) II + III total score.ResultsOf 217 patients entering the open-label study, 47% were still in the study upon closure; 24% withdrew because of AEs and 6% because of lack of efficacy. The median exposure to rotigotine was 1910 days (～5 years, 3 months; range 1–2188 days). Most common AEs were somnolence (23% per patient-year), falls (17%), peripheral edema (14%), nausea (12%), and application site reactions (ASRs; 12%). 3% withdrew because of ASRs. 26% patients did not initiate levodopa; of those who did, fewer than half started levodopa in the first year. Dyskinesias were reported by 25% patients; the majority (83%) reported their first episode after initiating levodopa. Mean UPDRS II + III total scores remained below double-blind baseline for up to 2 years of open-label treatment.ConclusionThis is the longest interventional study of rotigotine conducted to date. Transdermal rotigotine was generally well tolerated for up to 6 years; AEs reported were similar to those observed in shorter studies and led to discontinuation in only 24% patients.     

Efficacy,safety, and tolerability of overnight switching from immediate‐ to once daily extended‐release pramipexole in early Parkinson's disease

The aim of this article is to test the feasibility, in early Parkinson's disease (PD), of an overnight switch from immediate‐release (IR) pramipexole to a new once‐daily extended‐release (ER) formulation. Nonfluctuating patients on pramipexole IR three‐times daily, alone or with levodopa, for early PD were randomly switched overnight to double‐blind IR three‐times daily (N = 52) or ER once‐daily (N = 104) at initially unchanged daily dosage. Successful switching (defined as no worsening >15% of baseline UPDRS II+III score and no drug‐related adverse event withdrawal) was assessed at 9 weeks, after optional dosage adjustments (primary endpoint), and at 4 weeks, before adjustment. Other secondary endpoints included adjusted mean changes from baseline in UPDRS scores and proportion of responders based on Clinical or Patient Global Impression (CGI/PGI). Absolute difference between percentage of successful switch to ER versus IR was tested for ER noninferiority, defined as a 95% confidence‐interval lower bound not exceeding ?15%. At 9 weeks, 84.5% of the ER group had been successfully switched, versus 94.2% for IR. Noninferiority was not demonstrated, with a difference of ?9.76% (95% CI: [?18.81%, +1.66%]). At 4 weeks, 81.6% of the ER group had been successfully switched, versus 92.3% for IR, a difference of ?10.75% (95% CI: [?20.51%, +1.48%]). UPDRS changes and CGI/PGI analyses showed no differences between the groups. Both formulations were safe and well tolerated. Pramipexole ER was not equivalent to IR, but the difference was marginal. The fact that >80% of the patients successfully switched overnight at unchanged dosage shows that this practice was feasible in most patients. © 2010 Movement Disorder Society     

Randomized, double-blind study of pramipexole with placebo and bromocriptine in advanced Parkinson's disease.

We compared the efficacy and safety of pramipexole (PPX) with placebo in the treatment of advanced Parkinson's disease (PD) as an adjunct to levodopa. A bromocriptine (BR) group was included to enable determination of the noninferiority of PPX relative to BR as the standard treatment.     

Long-term safety and efficacy of apomorphine infusion in Parkinson's disease patients with persistent motor fluctuations: Results of the open-label phase of the TOLEDO study

IntroductionThe randomized, double-blind phase (DBP) of the TOLEDO study confirmed the efficacy of apomorphine infusion (APO) in reducing OFF time in PD patients with persistent motor fluctuations despite optimized oral/transdermal therapy. Here we report safety and efficacy results including the 52-week open-label phase (OLP).MethodsAll patients completing the 12-week DBP (including those switching early to open-label treatment) were offered OLP entry. The primary objective was the evaluation of long-term safety of APO.ResultsEighty-four patients entered the OLP (40 previously on APO, 44 on placebo) and 59 patients (70.2%) completed the study. The safety profile of APO was consistent with experience from extensive clinical use. Common treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were mild or moderate infusion site nodules, somnolence and nausea. Fourteen (16.7%) patients discontinued the OLP due to AEs, those involving >1 patient were infusion site reactions (n = 4) and fatigue (n = 2); hemolytic anemia occurred in one case. Reduction in daily OFF time and improvement in ON time without troublesome dyskinesia were sustained for up to 64 weeks. Pooled data for week 64 (n = 55) showed a mean (SD) change from DBP baseline in daily OFF time of −3.66 (2.72) hours and in ON time without troublesome dyskinesia of 3.31 (3.12) hours. Mean (±SD) daily levodopa-equivalent dose decreased from DBP baseline to week 64 by 543 mg (±674) and levodopa dose by 273 mg (±515).ConclusionsThe safety and efficacy of APO infusion were demonstrated with long-term use for persistent motor fluctuations, allowing substantial reductions in oral PD medication.     

Early institution of bromocriptine in Parkinson's disease inhibits the emergence of levodopa-associated motor side effects. Long-term results of the PRADO study

Summary Long-term levodopa treatment in Parkinson's disease is typically associated with motor side effects consisting in dyskinesias and/or fluctuations in motility referred to as the on-off phenomena. The main objective of this prospective, randomized, multi-centre study was to determine to what extent the development of such complications could be prevented by partial substitution of levodopa monotherapy (L-DOPA/benserazide) by bromocriptine in patients with early symptoms of the disease. The basic trial population included 674 newly diagnosed Parkinsonian patients that were randomly allocated to monotherapy with levodopa or a combination therapy based upon a nearly 40% replacement of levodopa by bromocriptine. The two target regimens had to be consistently maintained for 42 months. Parkinsonian symptoms were assessed by means of the Webster rating scale, the Hoehn and Yahr scale, and the Zung Self-Rating Depression scale. Motor side effects and adverse events were recorded at each regular clinic visit.Neurological symptoms improved and stabilized in a similar manner during treatment with both regimens throughout the study period. Motor side effects were observed in more patients on levodopa alone than on combination therapy (28.8 vs 20%; p=0.008). According to Kaplan-Meier estimates the cumulative probability of experiencing motor side effects was 0.43 on monotherapy, compared to 0.28 on combination therapy, which was equal to a one third reduction of risk (p=0.025). In regard to motor side effects, the degree of substitution of levodopa proved relevant: patients with >50% substitution by bromocriptine exhibited half the risk observed in those with <30% (p=0.045). The overall burden of motor side effects, as reflected by a sum score based upon the relevance, the severity and the extent of motor dysfunction, was also significantly less on combination therapy (p=0.046).In conclusion, partial substitution of levodopa by bromocriptine (>30%) as first-line treatment of Parkinson's disease proves active in the prophylaxis of levodopa associated motor side effects. Early combination therapy therefore extends the period of optimal disease control.Dedicated to Dr. H. Bühlmann on the occasion of his 80th birthday     

Phase II safety,tolerability, and dose selection study of isradipine as a potential disease‐modifying intervention in early Parkinson's disease (STEADY‐PD)

Isradipine, a dihydropyridine calcium channel antagonist, has been shown to be neuroprotective in animal models of Parkinson's disease (PD). To establish a dosage of isradipine controlled‐release (CR) that is tolerable and demonstrates preliminary efficacy for use in a future pivotal efficacy trial a Phase 2, randomized, double‐blind, parallel group trial (Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy Assessment of Dynacirc CR in Parkinson Disease [STEADY‐PD]) was undertaken in subjects with early PD not requiring dopaminergic therapy (dopamine agonists or levodopa) randomized 1:1:1:1 to 5, 10, or 20 mg of isradipine CR or matching placebo daily. The primary outcome was tolerability defined as no more than a 30% difference in the proportion of patients completing the study on the originally assigned dosage between an active and placebo group. If more than one isradipine dosage was tolerable, then a 3‐point difference in total Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) change between baseline and week 52 (or time to sufficient disability to require dopaminergic therapy) was taken as a criterion for selection of the most desirable dosage for future study. STEADY‐PD enrolled 99 subjects. The tolerability of isradipine was dose dependent: placebo, 25 of 26 patients (96%); 5 mg, 19 of 23 patients (83%); 10 mg 19 of 26 patients (73%); and 20 mg 9 of 24 patients (37%). There was no difference in change in UPDRS among dosages. The most common adverse events were peripheral edema (30) and dizziness (24). Isradipine 10 mg daily was the maximal tolerable dosage in this study of early PD. A large placebo‐controlled trial will be necessary and is planned to assess efficacy of isradipine 10 mg daily to slow progression of PD disability. © 2013 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.     

Double‐blind study of pardoprunox,a new partial dopamine agonist,in early Parkinson's disease

This study examined the efficacy and safety of the partial dopamine agonist, pardoprunox (SLV308), in the treatment of patients with early Parkinson's disease (PD). Patients were randomized to receive pardoprunox (n = 69) or placebo (n = 70). Pardoprunox was titrated to each patient's optimal dose (9–45 mg/d) over 2 to 6 weeks and then maintained at this dose for a further 3 weeks. Concomitant anti‐Parkinson treatment was not permitted. In the primary analysis, Unified PD Rating Scale (UPDRS)‐Motor score was improved in pardoprunox‐treated patients (overall mean dose 23.8 mg/d; ?7.3 points), as compared with placebo (?3.0 points; P = 0.0001), from baseline to end point. At end point, there were more responders (≥30% reduction in UPDRS‐Motor score) in the pardoprunox group (50.7%) than in the placebo group (15.7%; P < 0.0001). In other secondary analyses, UPDRS‐activities of daily living (ADL) and ‐ADL+Motor scores were also significantly more improved in the pardoprunox group. Nausea was reported by 32 of 68 (47.1%) pardoprunox‐treated patients (vs. 3/70, 4.3%, placebo‐treated patients), with dizziness, somnolence, headache, and asthenia also reported by ≥10 patients. In this exploratory proof‐of‐concept study, pardoprunox significantly improved motor function in patients with early PD. The efficacy and safety profile of pardoprunox justifies its further investigation in PD. © 2010 Movement Disorder Society