The anticonvulsant effects of volatile anesthetics on lidocaine-induced seizures in cats

Large concentrations of sevoflurane and isoflurane, but not halothane, induce spikes in the electroencephalogram. To elucidate whether these proconvulsant effects affect lidocaine-induced seizures, we compared the effects of sevoflurane, isoflurane, and halothane in cats. Fifty animals were allocated to 1 of 10 groups: 70% nitrous oxide (N2O), 0.6 minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration (MAC) + 70% N2O, 1.5 MAC + 70% N2O, and 1.5 MAC of each volatile agent in oxygen. Lidocaine 4 mg x kg(-1) x min(-1) was infused IV under mechanical ventilation with muscle relaxation. Electroencephalogram in the cortex, amygdala, and hippocampus and multiunit activities in the midbrain reticular formation (R-MUA) were recorded. Lidocaine induced spikes first from the amygdala or hippocampus in the 70% N2O and halothane groups and from the cortex in the sevoflurane and isoflurane groups. Lidocaine induced seizures in all cats in the 70% N2O and 0.6 MAC + N2O groups. Seizure occurrence was reduced in the 1.5 MAC + N2O group (P < 0.05 versus 70% N2O). The onset of seizure was delayed in the 0.6 MAC + N2O and 1.5 MAC groups for sevoflurane and isoflurane, but not for halothane, compared with the 70% N2O group (P < 0.05). Lidocaine increased R-MUA with seizure by 130%+/-56% in the 70% N2O group. The increase of R-MUA with seizure was more suppressed in the volatile anesthetic groups than in the 70% N2O group (P < 0.05). In the present study, sevoflurane and isoflurane attenuated seizure when the blood lidocaine concentration was accidentally increased. IMPLICATIONS: Increasingly, epidural blockade is combined with general anesthesia to achieve stress-free anesthesia and continuous pain relief in the postoperative period. In the present study, sevoflurane and isoflurane attenuated seizure when the blood lidocaine concentration was accidentally increased.     

Does epidural anesthesia have general anesthetic effects? A prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Clinically, patients require surprisingly low end-tidal concentrations of volatile agents during combined epidural-general anesthesia. Neuraxial anesthesia exhibits sedative properties that may reduce requirements for general anesthesia. The authors tested whether epidural lidocaine reduces volatile anesthetic requirements as measured by the minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) of sevoflurane for noxious testing cephalad to the sensory block. METHODS: In a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 44 patients received 300 mg epidural lidocaine (group E), epidural saline control (group C), or epidural saline-intravenous lidocaine infusion (group I) after premedication with 0.02 mg/kg midazolam and 1 microg/kg fentanyl. Tracheal intubation followed standard induction with 4 mg/kg thiopental and succinylcholine 1 mg/kg. After 10 min or more of stable end-tidal sevoflurane, 10 s of 50 Hz, 60 mA tetanic electrical stimulation were applied to the fifth cervical dermatome. Predetermined end-tidal sevoflurane concentrations and the MAC for each group were determined by the up-and-down method and probit analysis based on patient movement. RESULTS: MAC of sevoflurane for group E, 0.52+/-0.18% (+/- 95% confidence interval [CI]), differed significantly from group C, 1.18+/-0.18% (P < 0.0005), and from group I, 1.04+/-0.18% (P < 0.001). The plasma lidocaine levels in groups E and I were comparable (2.3+/-1.0 vs. 3.0+/-1.2 microg/ml +/- SD). CONCLUSIONS: Lidocaine epidural anesthesia reduced the MAC of sevoflurane by approximately 50%. This MAC sparing is most likely caused by indirect central effects of spinal deafferentation and not to systemic effects of lidocaine or direct neural blockade. Thus, lower concentrations of volatile agents than those based on standard MAC values may be adequate during combined epidural-general anesthesia.     

Plasma lidocaine concentrations during epidural blockade with isoflurane or halothane anesthesia.

Because isoflurane maintains hepatic blood flow at higher flows than halothane, we proposed that the elimination of lidocaine would be different between these two volatile anesthetics. The plasma lidocaine concentrations were determined in 14 female patients undergoing epidural blockade plus isoflurane anesthesia and compared with those obtained during halothane anesthesia for lower abdominal surgery. General anesthesia was maintained with isoflurane (0.46% +/- 0.04% [mean +/- SE] inspired, n = 7) or halothane (0.48% +/- 0.05% inspired, n = 7) and 67% nitrous oxide in oxygen. All patients received 2% lidocaine solution, 10 mL as a bolus dose and continuous administration at a rate of 10 mL/h, through the epidural catheter. The plasma lidocaine concentrations over 180 min after the epidural injection in patients receiving isoflurane were similar to those in patients receiving halothane. The results suggest that low inspired concentrations of isoflurane do not reduce plasma lidocaine concentrations in patients during epidural blockade, compared with halothane.     

The influence of different volatile inhaled anesthetics on the plasma protein binding of lidocaine

The author investigated the interactions of protein binding of lidocaine by inhaled anesthetics (halothane, enflurane, isoflurane and sevoflurane in vitro and in vivo. In the in vitro study, no significant changes of protein binding ratio were observed between the controls and any concentrations of the inhaled anesthetics even under high concentration (10 MAC). However, the percent of protein binding was inversely related to the total plasma lidocaine concentration. At lidocaine concentrations of 2, 5 and 9 micrograms.ml-1, the binding ratios were 66.37 +/- 5.36 (%), 55.58 +/- 4.38(%) and 51.66 +/- 4.12(%) respectively. By regression analysis (in vivo), the following relationship was obtained. Y = -0.66X +/- 57.4 (Y: % of protein binding fraction, X: lidocaine concentration). In terms of lidocaine protein binding, there seems to be no hazard in using lidocaine with any inhaled anesthetics.     

Epidural clonidine suppresses the baroreceptor-sympathetic response depending on isoflurane concentrations in cats

Epidural administration of clonidine induces hypotension and bradycardia secondary to decreased sympathetic nerve activity. In this study, we sought to elucidate the change in baroreflex response caused by epidural clonidine. Thirty-six cats were allocated to six groups (n = 6 each) and were given either thoracic epidural clonidine 4 micro g/kg or lidocaine 2 mg/kg during 0.5, 1.0, or 1.5 minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration (MAC) isoflurane anesthesia. Heart rate (HR), mean arterial blood pressure (MAP), and cardiac sympathetic nerve activity (CSNA) were measured. Depressor and pressor responses were induced by IV nitroprusside 10 micro g/kg and phenylephrine 10 micro g/kg, respectively. Baroreflex was evaluated by the change in both CSNA and HR relative to the peak change in MAP (deltaCSNA/deltaMAP and deltaHR/deltaMAP, respectively). These measurements were performed before and 30 min after epidural drug administration. Epidural clonidine and lidocaine decreased HR, MAP, and CSNA by similar extents. deltaCSNA/deltaMAP and deltaHR/deltaMAP for depressor response were suppressed with epidural lidocaine and clonidine in all groups but the clonidine 0.5 MAC isoflurane group (0.197 +/- 0.053 to 0.063 +/- 0.014 and 0.717 +/- 0.156 to 0.177 +/- 0.038, respectively, by epidural lidocaine [P < 0.05] but 0.221 +/- 0.028 to 0.164 +/- 0.041 and 0.721 +/- 0.177 to 0.945 +/- 0.239, respectively, by epidural clonidine during 0.5 MAC isoflurane). Those for pressor response were suppressed in all groups. We conclude that thoracic epidural clonidine suppresses baroreflex gain during isoflurane anesthesia >1.0 MAC but may offer certain advantages compared with epidural lidocaine during 0.5 MAC isoflurane by virtue of preserving baroreflex sensitivity when inadvertent hypotension occurs.     

The effects of epidural insertion site and surgical procedure on plasma lidocaine concentration

We compared the plasma lidocaine concentrations associated with continuous epidural infusion at different insertion sites in patients during surgery using epidural plus general anesthesia. In Study 1, there were 12 patients in each of four surgical groups in whom blood loss was expected to be <400 mL. The four groups were as follows: the lower extremity, the lower abdomen, the upper abdomen, and the lung. Liver surgery was excluded from Study 1. Study 2 comprised patients undergoing radical hysterectomy or radical prostatectomy (a radical operation group, n = 12) and hepatectomy (a hepatectomy group, n = 12) in whom the expected surgical blood loss was more than 1500 mL. All patients initially received 0.1 mL/kg followed by a continuous infusion of 0.1 mL. kg(-1). h(-1) of 1.5% lidocaine, and plasma concentrations of lidocaine were measured at 15, 30, 60, 90, and 120 min and every 60 min thereafter to 300 min. The plasma lidocaine concentration during surgery did not change regardless of the infusion site or the surgical site, other than the liver. The plasma concentrations of lidocaine in the hepatectomy group increased significantly at 180 min (2.9 +/- 0.6 microg/mL, P < 0.01), 240 min (3.5 +/- 0.7 microg/mL, P < 0.01), and 300 min (3.6 +/- 0.74 microg/mL, P < 0.01) compared with that at 15 min (2.0 +/- 0.3 microg/mL), and these values were significantly larger than those in all other groups.     

An analgesic action of intranvenously administered lidocaine on dorsal-horn neurons responding to noxious thermal stimulation.

Using extracellular single-unit recording techniques, effects of intravenously administered lidocaine on dorsal-horn nociceptive neurons were studied in cats made decerebrate whose spinal cords had been transected. Thirty-seven neurons in Rexed lamina V responding to high-threshold mechanical and noxious thermal stimuli (radiant heat, using Hardy-Wolff-Goodell dolorimeter) were studied. Lidocaine hydrochloride, 2.5, 5, and 10 mg/kg, iv, produced dose-related suppression of both spontaneous activity and responses of these neurons to noxious thermal stimulation. Spontaneous discharge frequencies at maximum suppression, observed 3--7 min after administration of each of the three doses of lidocaine were 64 +/- 14 (mean +/- 1 SE), 32 +/- 8, and 25 +/- 9 per cent of control values, respectively; responses to noxious thermal stimuli were 83 +/- 5, 52 +/- 8, and 39 +/- 7 per cent of the control values, respectively. Threshold skin temperature to noxious thermal stimulation increased from 44.7 +/- 0.4 C (control) to 46.3 +/- 0.7 C with lidocaine, 5 mg/kg (P less than 0.05), to 47.8 +/- 0.8 C with lidocaine, 10 mg/kg (P less than 0.01). The times necessary for recovery varied in a dose-related fashion. Plasma lidocaine concentrations 5 min after lidocaine, 5 mg/kg, averaged 3.6 +/- 0.7 microgram/ml. These data support the clinical impression that intravenously administered lidocaine produces analgesia at plasma concentrations of 3--10 microgram/ml. It is suggested that lidocaine may block conduction of nociceptive impulses, at least in part, by suppression of spinal-cord nociceptive neurons.     

Small-dose dopamine increases epidural lidocaine requirements during peripheral vascular surgery in elderly patients

We studied 20 patients over the age of 65 yr undergoing prolonged peripheral vascular surgery under continuous lidocaine epidural anesthesia, anticipating that the increased hepatic metabolism caused by small-dose IV dopamine would lower plasma lidocaine concentrations. Subjects were assigned (random, double-blinded) to receive either a placebo IV infusion or dopamine, 2 microg. kg(-1). min(-1) during and for 5 h after surgery. Five minutes after the IV infusion was started, 20 mL of 2% lidocaine was injected through the epidural catheter. One-half hour later, a continuous epidural infusion of 2% lidocaine at 10 mL/h was begun. The epidural infusion was temporarily decreased to 5 mL/h or 5 mL boluses were added to maintain a T8 analgesic level. Arterial blood samples were analyzed for plasma lidocaine concentrations regularly during and for 5 h after surgery. Plasma lidocaine concentrations increased continuously during the epidural infusion and, despite wide individual variation, were similar for the two groups throughout the observation period. During the observation period, the mean maximal plasma lidocaine concentration was 5.8 +/- 2.3 microg/mL in the control group and 5.7 +/- 1.2 microg/mL in the dopamine group. However, the mean hourly lidocaine requirement during surgery was significantly different, 242 +/- 72 mg/h for control and 312 +/- 60 mg/h for dopamine patients (P < 0.03). At the end of Hour 4, the last period when all 20 patients were still receiving the epidural lidocaine infusion, the total lidocaine requirement was significantly different, 1088 +/- 191 mg for the control group and 1228 +/- 168 mg for the dopamine group (P < 0.05). Despite very large total doses of epidural lidocaine (1650 +/- 740 mg, control patients, and 1940 +/- 400, dopamine patients) mean maximal plasma concentrations remained below 6 microg/mL, and no patient exhibited signs or symptoms of toxicity. We conclude that small-dose IV dopamine increased epidural lidocaine requirements, presumably as a consequence of increased metabolism. IMPLICATIONS: We tested dopamine, a drug that increases liver metabolism of the local anesthetic lidocaine to determine if it would prevent excessively large amounts of lidocaine in the blood during prolonged epidural anesthesia in elderly patients. Dopamine did not alter the blood levels of lidocaine, but it did increase the lidocaine dose requirement to maintain adequate epidural anesthesia.     

The anticonvulsant effects of volatile anesthetics on penicillin-induced status epilepticus in cats

Volatile anesthetics may be used to treat status epilepticus when conventional drugs are ineffective. We studied 30 cats to compare the inhibitory effects of sevoflurane, isoflurane, and halothane on penicillin-induced status epilepticus. Anesthesia was induced and maintained with one of the three volatile anesthetics in oxygen. Penicillin G was injected into the cisterna magna, and the volatile anesthetic discontinued. Once status epilepticus was induced (convulsive period), the animal was reanesthetized with 0.6 minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration (MAC) of the volatile anesthetic for 30 min, then with 1.5 MAC for the next 30 min. Electroencephalogram and multiunit activity in the midbrain reticular formation were recorded. At 0.6 MAC, all anesthetics showed anticonvulsant effects. Isoflurane and halothane each abolished the repetitive spike phase in one cat; isoflurane reduced the occupancy of the repetitive spike phase (to 27%+/-22% of the convulsive period (mean +/- SD) significantly more than sevoflurane (60%+/-29%; P < 0.05) and halothane (61%+/-24%; P < 0.05), and the increase of midbrain reticular formation with repetitive spikes was reduced by all volatile anesthetics. The repetitive spikes were abolished by 1.5 MAC of the anesthetics: in 9 of 10 cats by sevoflurane, in 9 of 9 cats by isoflurane, and in 9 of 11 cats by halothane. In conclusion, isoflurane, sevoflurane, and halothane inhibited penicillin-induced status epilepticus, but isoflurane was the most potent. IMPLICATIONS: Convulsive status epilepticus is an emergency state and requires immediate suppression of clinical and electrical seizures, but conventional drugs may be ineffective. In such cases, general anesthesia may be effective. In the present study, we suggest that isoflurane is preferable to halothane and sevoflurane to suppress sustained seizure.     

Absence of agonistic or antagonistic effect of flumazenil (Ro 15-1788) in dogs anesthetized with enflurane, isoflurane, or fentanyl-enflurane

This study determined the effects of flumazenil on the anesthetic requirements (MAC) of the dog for isoflurane (group 1; n = 6), enflurane (group 2; n = 7), and a combination of fentanyl-enflurane (group 3; n = 6). Control MAC in each group was determined by the tail-clamp method. Each animal in groups 1 and 2 received four iv incremental doses of flumazenil: 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, and 4.5 mg/kg, and isoflurane MAC or enflurane MAC was determined after each dose. The animals in group 3 received a loading dose and a continuous infusion of fentanyl 0.8 micrograms.kg-1.min-1 over 8 h, and enflurane MAC was determined four times during this experimental period. After the fourth enflurane MAC determination in each animal of group 3, a single iv dose of flumazenil 1.5 mg/kg was injected and enflurane MAC was then determined for the last time. In the incremental doses administered, flumazenil did not demonstrate any agonistic or antagonistic interaction with isoflurane, enflurane, or the fentanyl-enflurane combination. In group 3, plasma fentanyl concentrations remained stable at 12.5 +/- 3.0 ng/ml (mean +/- SD) throughout the experiment and reduced enflurane MAC by 60 +/- 8%. The addition of flumazenil changed neither the fentanyl concentration in plasma (12.2 +/- 3.8 ng/ml) nor its reduction of enflurane MAC (61 +/- 7%). In conclusion, the absence of effect of flumazenil on the MAC of enflurane, isoflurane, or a fentanyl-enflurane combination suggests that they do not interact with the benzodiazepine receptor.     

Propofol does not inhibit lidocaine metabolism during epidural anesthesia

Propofol is sometimes used in combination with epidural anesthesia with lidocaine. In this study, we investigated the effect of propofol on the plasma concentration of lidocaine and its principal metabolites during epidural anesthesia with lidocaine. Thirty-two patients were randomly allocated to receive either propofol or sevoflurane anesthesia (n = 16 each). In the propofol group, anesthesia was maintained with a target concentration of propofol of 4 microg/mL. In the sevoflurane group, anesthesia was maintained with 1.5% sevoflurane. Lidocaine was administered epidurally in an initial dose of 5 mg/kg, followed by a continuous infusion at 2.5 mg x kg(-1) x h(-1). Free components of plasma lidocaine and its metabolites-monoethylglycinexylidide (MEGX) and glycinexylidide (GX)-were measured 30, 60, 120, and 180 min after the initiation of continuous epidural injection by using high-performance liquid chromatography. Free lidocaine, MEGX, and GX were separated from 2 mL of plasma by ultrafiltration filter units. Hemodynamic data were similar between groups. The plasma concentrations of free lidocaine were not significantly different between groups. The ratios of free MEGX to free lidocaine and free GX to free MEGX were not different between groups. In conclusion, propofol does not alter the metabolism of epidural lidocaine compared with sevoflurane.     

The number of injections does not influence local anesthetic absorption after paravertebral blockade

PURPOSE: The aims of this study are to determine if the injection of a single large dose of local anesthetics into the paravertebral space increases the risks of inducing toxicity compared with multiple small injections and to describe ropivacaine plasma concentrations resulting from paravertebral blockade. METHODS: Paravertebral blockade was performed using a solution of 10 mL ropivacaine 0.75%, 10 mL lidocaine CO2 2% plus 0.1 mL epinephrine 1:1000 either by a single injection at T3 or T4 (Group S, n = 6) or by five injections of 4 mL each at T2 to T6 (Group M, n = 8). Blood samples were taken at zero, five, ten, 15, 20, 30, 45, 60 and 90 min and at two, three, four, five, six and eight hours. Ropivacaine and lidocaine plasma concentrations were measured by high performance liquid chromatography. RESULTS: Maximal plasma concentrations were comparable for lidocaine: 2.6 +/- 1.3 (S) vs 2.6 +/- 0.8 microg x mL(-1) (M) and for ropivacaine: 1.3 +/- 0.2 (S) vs 1.3 +/- 0.1 microg x mL(-1) (M). Area under the plasma concentration-time curve was higher in Group M for lidocaine: 577.6 +/- 146.1 vs 401.7 +/- 53.2 mg x min(-1) x mL(-1) (P = 0.04) but similar for ropivacaine: 381.1 +/- 95.4 (M) vs 363.1 +/- 85.3 mg x min(-1) x L(-1) (S). CONCLUSIONS: The injection of a single large bolus of local anesthetics into the paravertebral space does not increase its absorption. Maximal ropivacaine plasma concentrations resulting from paravertebral blockade are similar to those reported with equivalent doses of bupivacaine.     

Endotracheal administration of lidocaine inhibits isofluraneinduced tachycardia

PURPOSE: Rapid increase in inspired isoflurane concentration increases heart rate and arterial blood pressure. To investigate whether the responses to isoflurane were elicited from stimulation of lower airway and/or lungs, haemodynamic responses to isoflurane administered after tracheal intubation were measured with or without endotracheal or intravenous administration of lidocaine. METHODS: Seventy-two ASA physical status 1 patients, aged 21-50 yr, were randomly allocated to one of four groups. After tracheal intubation, anaesthesia was maintained with oxygen 100% and isoflurane 1.0% with controlled ventilation. After stabilization for 15 min, the isoflurane concentration was rapidly increased to 3.0% in three groups. An endotracheal lidocaine group received pretreatment with endotracheal 0.4 ml lidocaine 8% spray, an intravenous lidocaine group received pretreatment of 32 mg lidocaine i.v., and an isoflurane 3% group received not pre- treatment. In a control group, inspired isoflurane concentration was maintained at 1.0%. Heart rate, systolic blood pressure and end-tidal isoflurane concentration were measured every minute for 10 min. RESULTS: The rapid increase in isoflurane concentration increased heart rate (25 +/- 12% increase from baseline; P < 0.05) but the increase was reduced by endotracheal lidocaine (9 +/- 9%), but not by intravenous lidocaine (22 +/- 13%). The plasma concentration of lidocaine was lower in the endotracheal lidocaine group (0.4 +/- 0.3 microgram.ml-1) than in the i.v. lidocaine group (1.5 +/- 0.2 micrograms.ml-1). CONCLUSION: The isoflurane-induced tachycardia is reduced by pre-treatment with endotracheal lidocaine.     

Desflurane and Isoflurane Increase Lumbar Cerebrospinal Fluid Pressure in Normocapnic Patients Undergoing Transsphenoidal Hypophysectomy

Background: Rapid emergence from anesthesia makes desflurane an attractive choice as an anesthetic for patients having neurosurgery. However, the data on the effect of desflurane on intracranial pressure in humans are still limited and inconclusive. The authors hypothesized that isoflurane and desflurane increase intracranial pressure compared with propofol.

Methods: Anesthesia was induced with intravenous fentanyl and propofol in 30 patients having transsphenoidal hypophysectomy with no evidence of mass effect, and it was maintained with 70% nitrous oxide in oxygen and a continuous 100 micro gram [centered dot] kg sup -1 [centered dot] min sup -1 infusion of propofol. Patients were assigned to three groups randomized to receive only continued propofol infusion (n = 10), desflurane (n = 10), or isoflurane (n = 10) for 20 min. During the 20-min study period, each patient in the desflurane and isoflurane groups received, in random order, two concentrations (0.5 minimum alveolar concentration [MAC] and 1.0 MAC end-tidal) of desflurane or isoflurane for 10 min each. Lumbar cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pressure, blood pressure, heart rate, and anesthetic concentrations were monitored continuously.

Results: Lumbar CSF pressure increased significantly in all patients receiving desflurane or isoflurane. Lumbar CSF pressure increased by 5 +/- 3 mmHg at 1-MAC concentrations of desflurane and by 4 +/- 2 mmHg at 1-MAC concentrations of isoflurane. Cerebral perfusion pressure decreased by 12 +/- 10 mmHg at 1-MAC concentrations of desflurane and by 15 +/- 10 mmHg at 1-MAC concentrations of isoflurane. Heart rate increased by 7 +/- 9 bpm with 0.5 MAC desflurane and by 8 +/- 7 bpm with 1.0 MAC desflurane, and by 5 +/- 11 bpm with 1.0 MAC isoflurane. Systolic blood pressure decreased in all but the patients receiving 1.0 MAC desflurane. To maintain blood pressure within predetermined limits, phenylephrine was administered to six of ten patients in the isoflurane group (range, 25 to 600 micro gram), two of ten patients in the desflurane group (range, 200 to 500 micro gram), and in no patients in the propofol group. Lumbar CSF pressure, heart rate, and systolic blood pressure did not change in the propofol group.     

Efficacy of simulated epinephrine-containing epidural test dose after intravenous atropine during isoflurane anesthesia in children

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: A double-blind, randomized study was performed to investigate heart rate (HR) and blood pressure responses to 2 doses of intravenous (IV) epinephrine (0.5 and 0.75 microg/kg) in 61 children, ages 3 months to 12 years. METHODS: Anesthesia was maintained with isoflurane (age-adjusted 1 minimal alveolar concentration [MAC]) in oxygen. All patients received IV atropine (10 microg/kg) and 5 minutes later were randomized to receive IV solutions (0.1 mL/kg) containing 1% lidocaine (n = 19, group I) with saline; lidocaine 1% with epinephrine 0.5 microg/kg (n = 21, group II); or lidocaine 1% with epinephrine 0.75 microg/kg (n = 21, group III). HR was recorded at 0, 15, 30, 45, 60, 90 seconds, and 2, 3, 4, and 5 minutes after test-dose injection. Systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure, and end-tidal carbon dioxide were recorded at steady-state isoflurane anesthesia, after the injection of atropine, and at 45-second intervals after test-dose injections. RESULTS: Median maximum increases in HR were similar in groups II and III at 19 and 22 beats per minute (beats/min), respectively. An HR increase of > or =10 beats/min was observed in 19 of 21 patients who received 0.5 microg/kg epinephrine and 21 of 21 patients receiving 0.75 microg/kg. None of the patients in group I developed HR increases > or =10 beats/min. SBP increased > or =15 mm Hg in 17 of 21 patients in group II and 19 of 21 in group III. No dysrhythmias or T-wave amplitude change was noted. CONCLUSIONS: A simulated epidural test dose containing lidocaine 1 mg/kg with epinephrine 0.75 microg/kg, administered IV following atropine, may reliably increase HR to indicate unintentional injection into epidural vessels of children anesthetized with 1 MAC isoflurane.     

Activated endothelial interleukin-1beta, -6, and -8 concentrations and intercellular adhesion molecule-1 expression are attenuated by lidocaine

Endothelial cells play a key role in ischemia reperfusion injury. We investigated the effects of lidocaine on activated human umbilical vein endothelial cell (HUVEC) interleukin (IL)-1beta, IL-6, and IL-8 concentrations and intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) expression. HUVECs were pretreated with different concentrations of lidocaine (0 to 0.5 mg/mL) for 60 min, thereafter tumor necrosis factor-alpha was added at a concentration of 2.5 ng/mL and the cells incubated for 4 h. Supernatants were harvested, and cytokine concentrations were analyzed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Endothelial ICAM-1 expression was analyzed by using flow cytometry. Differences were assessed using analysis of variance and post hoc unpaired Student's t-test where appropriate. Lidocaine (0.5 mg/mL) decreased IL-1beta (1.89 +/- 0.11 versus 4.16 +/- 1.27 pg/mL; P = 0.009), IL-6 (65.5 +/- 5.14 versus 162 +/- 11.5 pg/mL; P < 0.001), and IL-8 (3869 +/- 785 versus 14,961 +/- 406 pg/mL; P < 0.001) concentrations compared with the control. IL-1beta, IL-6, and IL-8 concentrations in HUVECs treated with clinically relevant plasma concentrations of lidocaine (0.005 mg/mL) were similar to control. ICAM-1 expression on lidocaine-treated (0.05 mg/mL) HUVECs was less than on controls (198 +/- 52.7 versus 298 +/- 50.3; Mean Channel Fluorescence; P < 0.001). Activated endothelial IL-1beta, IL-6, and IL-8 concentrations and ICAM-1 expression are attenuated only by lidocaine at concentrations larger than clinically relevant concentrations.     

Isoflurane does not further impair microvascular vasomotion in a rat model of subarachnoid hemorrhage

PURPOSE: Since isoflurane is known to attenuate endothelium-dependent dilation (EDD) in normal cerebral arterioles, we examined whether the anesthetic has a similar effect and further impairs EDD in vessels exposed to SAH. METHODS: Autologous blood was introduced in the subarachnoid space and the parietal lobe harvested. Control animals were sacrificed without introduction of blood. The response of microvessles to the endothelium-dependent dilator adenosine diphosphate (ADP) 10(-9)-10(-4) M, the endothelium-independent dilator nitroprusside 10(-9)-10(-4) M, and ET-1 10(-13)-10(-8) M was measured by videomicroscopy in the presence of 0-2 minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) of isoflurane. RESULTS: Isoflurane attenuated EDD to ADP in control vessels [66 +/- 5% (control) vs 27 +/- 11% (2 MAC) dilation to ADP 10(-4) M, P < 0.05]. Although SAH was associated with reduced dilation to ADP, exposure to isoflurane did not further impair dilation to ADP after SAH [26 +/- 3% (SAH) vs 21 +/- 5% (SAH/2 MAC) dilation to ADP 10(-4) M, P = NS]. Dilation to nitroprusside was not affected by isoflurane or SAH. Constriction to ET-1 was reduced by 2 MAC of isoflurane [21 +/- 1% (control) vs 13 +/- 5% (2 MAC) constriction to ET-1 10(-8) M, P < 0.05], but not by 1 MAC of isoflurane in control vessels. Constriction to ET-1 was greatly attenuated by 1 or 2 MAC of isoflurane after SAH [32 +/- 5% (SAH) vs 18 +/- 4% (SAH/2 MAC) constriction to ET-1 10(-8) M, P < 0.05]. CONCLUSION: In rats, isoflurane does not further impair EDD after SAH and modulates the constrictive response to ET-1. Such an effect of isoflurane would not predispose the SAH-exposed vessels to vasospasm.     

The effect of lidocaine on neutrophil CD11b/CD18 and endothelial ICAM-1 expression and IL-1beta concentrations induced by hypoxia-reoxygenation

BACKGROUND: Lidocaine has actions potentially of benefit during ischaemia-reperfusion. Neutrophils and endothelial cells have an important role in ischaemia-reperfusion injury. METHODS: Isolated human neutrophil CD11b and CD18, and human umbilical vein endothelial cell (HUVEC) ICAM-1 expression and supernatant IL-1beta concentrations in response to hypoxia-reoxygenation were studied in the presence or absence of different concentrations of lidocaine (0.005, 0.05 and 0.5 mg mL(-1)). Adhesion molecule expression was quantified by flow cytometry and IL- 1beta concentrations by ELISA. Differences were assessed with analysis of variance and Student-Newman-Keuls as appropriate. Data are presented as mean+/-SD. RESULTS: Exposure to hypoxia-reoxygenation increased neutrophil CD11b (94.33+/-40.65 vs. 34.32+/-6.83 mean channel fluorescence (MCF), P = 0.02), CD18 (109.84+/-35.44 vs. 59.05+/-6.71 MCF, P = 0.03) and endothelial ICAM-1 (146.62+/-16.78 vs. 47.29+/-9.85 MCF, P < 0.001) expression compared to normoxia. Neutrophil CD18 expression on exposure to hypoxia-reoxygenation was less in lidocaine (0.005 mg mL(-1)) treated cells compared to control (71.07+/-10.14 vs. 109.84+/-35.44 MCF, P = 0.03). Endothelial ICAM-1 expression on exposure to hypoxia-reoxygenation was less in lidocaine (0.005 mg mL(-1)) treated cells compared to control (133.25+/-16.05 vs. 146.62+/-16.78 MCF, P = 0.03). Hypoxia-reoxygenation increased HUVEC supernatant IL-1beta concentrations compared to normoxia (3.41+/-0.36 vs. 2.65+/-0.21 pg mL(-1), P = 0.02). Endothelial supernatant IL-1beta concentrations in lidocaine-treated HUVECs were similar to controls. CONCLUSIONS: Lidocaine at clinically relevant concentrations decreased neutrophil CD18 and endothelial ICAM-1 expression but not endothelial IL-1beta concentrations.     

The additive contribution of nitrous oxide to isoflurane MAC in infants and children

The purpose of this study was to determine the contribution of nitrous oxide to isoflurane MAC in pediatric patients. MAC was determined in 47 infants and small children (mean ages 16.6 +/- 6.7 months) during isoflurane and oxygen anesthesia (n = 11) and isoflurane and nitrous oxide anesthesia (25% nitrous oxide [n = 12], 50% nitrous oxide [n = 12], and 75% nitrous oxide [n = 12]). After assigning patients to one of four groups, anesthesia was induced with increasing inspired concentrations of isoflurane in oxygen. After anesthetic induction and tracheal intubation, ventilation was controlled (carbon dioxide partial pressure = 32 +/- 5 mmHg), and nitrous oxide was added to the inspired gas mixture to achieve end-expired nitrous oxide concentrations of 0, 25, 50, or 75%. Inspired and expired gas samples were obtained from a distal sampling port in the tracheal tube. The response to skin incision in each patient was assessed at a previously selected end-tidal concentration of isoflurane. The MAC of isoflurane was determined in each group using the up-and-down method described for evaluating quantal responses. The mean duration of constant end-tidal concentrations prior to skin incision was 14 +/- 7 min (range 6-46 min). The ratio of expired to inspired nitrous oxide and isoflurane concentrations during the period of constant end-tidal concentrations was 0.96 +/- 0.01 and 0.93 +/- 0.03 respectively. The MAC of isoflurane in oxygen was 1.69 +/- 0.13 vol% (mean +/- standard deviation).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Plasma lidocaine levels and risks after liposuction with tumescent anaesthesia

BACKGROUND: It is common today to use tumescent anaesthesia with large doses of lidocaine for liposuction. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate lidocaine plasma levels and objective and subjective symptoms during 20 h after tumescent anaesthesia with approximately 35 mg per kg bodyweight of lidocaine for abdominal liposuction. METHODS: Three litres of buffered solution of 0.08% lidocaine with epinephrine was infiltrated subcutaneously over the abdomen in eight female patients during monitored intravenous (i.v.) light sedation. Plasma levels of lidocaine and signs of subjective and objective symptoms were recorded every 3 h for 20 h after liposuction. RESULTS: Lidocaine 33.2 +/- 1.8 mg/kg was given at a rate of 116 +/- 11 ml/min. Peak plasma levels (2.3 +/- 0.63 microg/ml) of lidocaine occurred after 5-17 h. No correlation was found between peak levels and dose per kg bodyweight or total amount of lidocaine infiltrated. One patient experienced tinnitus after 14 h when a plasma level of 3.3 microg/ml was recorded. CONCLUSION: Doses of lidocaine up to 35 mg/kg were sufficient for abdominal liposuction using the tumescent technique and gave no fluid overload or toxic symptoms in eight patients, but with this dose there is still a risk of subjective symptoms in association with the peak level of lidocaine that may appear after discharge.