Characteristics and outcome of patients with ST‐elevation infarction in relation to whether they received thrombolysis or underwent acute coronary angiography: Are we selecting the right patients for coronary angiography?

BACKGROUND: During the last decade, there has been an on-going debate with regard to whether percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or thrombolysis should be preferred in patients with ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Some studies clearly advocate PCI, while others do not. HYPOTHESIS: The study aimed to describe the characteristics and to evaluate outcome of patients with suspected ST-elevation or left bundle-branch block infarction in relation to whether they received thrombolysis or had an acute coronary angiography aiming at angioplasty. METHODS: The study included all patients admitted to Sahlgrenska University Hospital in G?teborg, Sweden, with suspected acute myocardial infarction who, during 1995-1999, had ST-elevation or left bundle-branch block on admission electrocardiogram (ECG) requiring either thrombolysis or acute coronary angiography. A retrospective evaluation with a follow-up of 1 year after the intervention was made. RESULTS: In all, 413 patients had thrombolytic treatment and 400 had acute coronary angiography. The patients who received thrombolysis were older (mean age 70.3 vs. 64.1 years). Mortality during 1 year of follow-up was 20.9% in the thrombolysis group and 16.6% in the angiography group (p = 0.12). Among patients in whom acute coronary angiography was performed, only 85% underwent acute percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). There was a mortality of 12.1 vs. 41.7% among those who did not undergo acute PCI. Development of reinfarction, stroke, and requirement of rehospitalization was similar regardless of type of initial intervention. The thrombolysis group more frequently required new coronary angiography (36.9 vs. 20.6%; p<0.0001) and new PCI (17.8 vs. 11.9%; p = 0.01). Despite this, after 1 year symptoms of angina pectoris were observed in 27% of patients in the thrombolysis group and in only 14% of those in the angiography group (p = 0.0002). CONCLUSION: In a Swedish university hospital with a high volume of coronary angioplasty procedures, we found no significant difference in mortality between patients who had thrombolysis and those who underwent acute coronary angiography. However, requirement of revascularization and symptoms of angina pectoris 1 year later was considerably less frequent in those who had undergone acute coronary angiography. However, distribution of baseline characteristics was skewed and efforts should be focused on the selection of patients for the different reperfusion strategies.     

Multicentre randomized trial comparing transport to primary angioplasty vs immediate thrombolysis vs combined strategy for patients with acute myocardial infarction presenting to a community hospital without a catheterization laboratory. The PRAGUE study.

BACKGROUND: Primary coronary angioplasty is an effective reperfusion strategy in acute myocardial infarction. However, its availability is limited, and transporting patients to an angioplasty centre in the acute phase of myocardial infarction has not yet been proved safe. METHODS: The PRAGUE study (PRimary Angioplasty in patients transferred from General community hospitals to specialized PTCA Units with or without Emergency thrombolysis) compared three reperfusion strategies in patients with acute myocardial infarction, presenting within 6 h of symptom onset at community hospitals without a catheterization laboratory: group A - thrombolytic therapy in community hospitals (n=99), group B - thrombolytic therapy during transportation to angioplasty (n=100), group C - immediate transportation for primary angioplasty without pre-treatment with thrombolysis (n=101). RESULTS: No complications occurred during transportation in group C. Two ventricular fibrillations occurred during transportation in group B. Median admission-reperfusion time in transported patients (group B 106 min, group C 96 min) compared favourably with the anticipated >90 min in group A. The combined primary end-point (death/reinfarction/stroke at 30 days) was less frequent in group C (8%) compared to groups B (15%) and A (23%, P<0. 02). The incidence of reinfarction was markedly reduced by transport to primary angioplasty (1% in group C vs 7% in group B vs 10% in group A, P<0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Transferring patients from community hospitals to a tertiary angioplasty centre in the acute phase of myocardial infarction is feasible and safe. This strategy is associated with a significant reduction in the incidence of reinfarction and the combined clinical end-point of death/reinfarction/stroke at 30 days when compared to standard thrombolytic therapy at the community hospital.     

Treatment of refractory unstable angina in geographically isolated areas without cardiac surgery. Invasive versus conservative strategy (TRUCS study).

AIMS: We compared invasive (on-site coronary angioplasty or emergency air-ambulance transfer for bypass grafting surgery) vs conservative (persistent medical treatment) strategies in the management of refractory unstable angina in geographically isolated hospitals without cardiac surgical facilities. METHODS AND RESULTS: One hundred and forty eight randomized patients with refractory unstable angina were compared on an intention-to-treat basis. Outcomes (invasive vs conservative): (a) in hospital: stabilization (96% vs 43%, P=0.0001), non-fatal myocardial infarction (2.6% vs 4.2%, P=ns), death (1.3% vs 8.3%, P=0.046), combined outcome (3.9% vs 12.5%, P=0.053) and hospitalization (11.4+/-6.3 vs 12.4+/-8.0 days, P=ns). (b) 30-days follow-up: non-fatal myocardial infarction (2.6% vs 4.2%, P=ns), death (2.6% vs 11.1%, P=0.030) and combined outcome (5.3% vs 15.3%, P=0.031). (c) 12 month follow-up: non-fatal myocardial infarction (3. 9% vs 4.2%, P=ns), death (3.9% vs 12.5%, P=0.053), combined outcome (7.9% vs 16.7%, P=ns), re-admissions for unstable angina: (17.1% vs 23.6%, P=ns), late coronary angioplasty: (15.8% vs 11.1%, P=ns) and (d) late coronary bypass grafting: (7.9% vs 12.5%, P=ns). CONCLUSION: Invasive treatment of patients with refractory angina in remote areas without surgical back-up results in significant in-hospital stabilization and a reduction in major events in-hospital and at 30 days. Coronary angioplasty in stand-alone units and air-transfer of these patients seems safe.     

溶栓后早期转运PCI与保守治疗/补救转运PCI治疗STEMI患者的比较

目的：本研究回顾分析比较急性心肌梗塞（AMI）患者在基层医院行溶栓治疗后,早期转运到上级医院行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗（PCI）和继续在当地予保守治疗然后作转运PCI的优劣。方法：315例AMI患者在发病12h内,于基层医院接受溶栓治疗,其后183例直接转诊行PCI（A组）,132例在当地继续保守治疗,67例因再次出现心肌缺血症状行补救性转运PCI（B组）。比较两组1年内全因死亡、再梗死、难治性心肌缺血发生率及30d内严重出血和脑卒中发生率,以及治疗前后左室射血分数（LVEF）改变情况。结果：与B组比较,A组1年内全因死亡率（6.8%比1.6%）、再梗死发生率（17.4%比3.3%）、难治性心肌缺血发生率（22.7%比4.4%）均明显降低（P均〈0.05）,而LVEF改善情况A组明显优于B组[（58.7±12.4）%比（47.6±11.9）%,P〈0.05]。结论：溶栓后的ST段抬高性心肌梗死患者应尽早转运到上级医院接受PCI治疗,以取得更好疗效。     

After thrombolytic therapy: angiography, angioplasty, or surgery?

Thrombolytic therapy has been found to improve the prognosis of selected patients with acute myocardial infarction. Many investigators advocate that combined emergency coronary angiography and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty be performed immediately after thrombolytic therapy. Emergency angiography documents the anatomic extent of coronary artery disease, shows whether reperfusion has occurred, and indicates whether emergency angioplasty is necessary. In this setting, emergency catheterization without angioplasty is associated with relatively little additional risk. However, a number of prospective trials have compared emergency angioplasty to more conservative treatment strategies, and emergency angioplasty has been not found to offer any advantage in terms of improved prognosis or preservation of left ventricular function. Therefore, it is probable that most patients with evolving Q-wave myocardial infarction are best treated with conservative strategies after initial thrombolytic therapy, although there may still be a role for emergency angioplasty in a relatively small subset who present with evolving myocardial infarction and severely depressed left ventricular function. Emergency coronary artery bypass surgery also appears to have a limited role in patients treated with thrombolytic therapy. Nevertheless, in occasional patients with a poor prognosis at hospital presentation, in whom thrombolytic therapy and emergency angioplasty have failed or are contraindicated, prompt emergency coronary artery bypass grafting may salvage the ischemic myocardium and improve the prognosis.     

Percutaneous coronary revascularization in patients over eighty: acute and long-term results]

BACKGROUND: As a consequence of prolonged life expectancy the number of older patients with symptomatic coronary artery disease is constantly increasing. The aim of the study was to evaluate procedural success, immediate and long-term outcomes and the predictive factors of prognosis in patients aged > 80 years with high-risk coronary artery disease treated with coronary angioplasty. METHODS: In this retrospective study, we report the diagnostic and therapeutic strategies adopted in patients aged > 80 years admitted to our institution for acute coronary syndrome with or without ST-segment elevation or disabling angina (CCS class 3-4) and the immediate and long-term results of patients treated with coronary angioplasty. RESULTS: A conservative approach was adopted in 180 patients (33%, group 1) out of the total number of 545 patients, while 365 patients (67%, group 2) underwent coronary angiography. Among these, 85% underwent revascularization. Relevant comorbidities were significantly higher in group 1 (59 vs 16%, p < 0.001) while a clinical presentation with ST-elevation myocardial infarction was prevalent in group 2 (15 vs 6%, p = 0.007). The in-hospital mortality was 19% in group 1 and 7.9% in group 2 (p = 0.001). Among 198 patients treated with angioplasty, procedural success was achieved in 93% of cases, with 8% in-hospital mortality. Periprocedural myocardial infarction occurred in 3.3% and major bleeding in 5.6% of patients. At multivariate analysis ST-elevation myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock were significantly related to the in-hospital mortality. At follow-up (mean 25 +/- 13 months) 13 patients died, 9 from cardiac causes and 4 from noncardiac events. Recurrence of ischemia requiring revascularization occurred in 15.9% of cases. Cumulative survival at follow-up was respectively 86% at 1 year and 83% at 5 years, while the event-free survival at 5 years was 59% in the entire group, without any significant difference among patients with multivessel disease in whom a complete vs an incomplete revascularization was performed. The presence of severe comorbidities appeared to be the only predictive factor of unfavorable outcome at long-term follow-up at multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: In patients aged > 80 years with symptomatic ischemic heart disease at high risk, the invasive approach was prevalent. Higher mortality rates were found in patients in whom coronary angiography was not performed. Comorbidities represent an important negative prognostic factor, impairing both the possibility of an invasive approach and conditioning an unfavorable outcome of revascularized patients. Coronary angioplasty can be successfully performed even in elderly patients. The in-hospital mortality turns out significantly higher in the setting of an acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction or in cardiogenic shock patients. For patients overcoming the acute phase, high survival rates can be expected at follow-up.     

Three-year follow-up of patients with silent ischemia in the subacute phase of myocardial infarction after thrombolysis and early coronary intervention

In order to assess the prognostic value of silent myocardial ischemia in acute myocardial infarction after thrombolysis and early coronary angiography (14-48 h after start of thrombolysis) including percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, if indicated, 126 patients underwent 24 h-Holter-monitoring in the early postinfarction period. The 24 h-Holter-recording was initiated directly after early coronary intervention (40+/-11 h after onset of symptoms). Of the 126 patients initially eligible for the study 29 had to be excluded from further analysis for clinical or methodical reasons. Of the remaining 97 patients, 10 (10%) had silent ischemia (group A) and 87/97 (90%) patients showed no significant ST-segment alterations. Both groups did not significantly differ from each other with regard to baseline clinical characteristics, severity of coronary artery disease and frequency of successful percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. The left ventricular ejection fraction showed a trend towards lower values in patients with than in those without silent ischemia (47+/-15% vs. 55+/-13%, p=0.07). When both silent ischemia and left ventricular ejection fraction <40% were present, a subset of patients at high risk for cardiac death could be identified (specificity: 98%, positive predictive accuracy: 75%). By Kaplan-Meier analysis, significantly more cardiac deaths occurred in group A than in group B (30% vs. 6%, p<0.01) during the three-year follow-up (950+/-392 days) after acute myocardial infarction. Regarding the cardiac events during long-term follow-up (emergency percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, coronary artery bypass grafting, non-fatal reinfarction, and cardiac death) there was no significant difference between both groups (30% vs. 18%, NS). In conclusion, Holter monitor-detected silent ischemia in the subacute phase of myocardial infarction after thrombolysis followed by early delayed coronary intervention occurs in 10% of the patients indicating either a residual ischemia in the infarcted zone despite a combined reperfusion strategy or a remote ischemic potential in case of multivessel disease. In this small selected group of infarct patients too, silent ischemia is to be considered as an important non-invasive parameter to predict cardiac death during long-term follow-up and provides valuable complementary information to left ventricular dysfunction, a well established prognostic marker in the postinfarction period.     

Interhospital transport for primary angioplasty improves the long-term outcome of acute myocardial infarction compared with immediate thrombolysis in the nearest hospital (one-year follow-up of the PRAGUE-1 study)

OBJECTIVE: Comparison of the long-term outcomes of three reperfusion strategies in patients with acute ST elevation myocardial infarction presenting to community hospitals. METHODS: One-year clinical outcomes were compared for 300 patients randomized in the PRimary Angioplasty in patients transferred from General community hospitals to specialized percutaneous coronary intervention Units with or without Emergency thrombolysis (PRAGUE-1) study to one of three treatment strategies: thrombolysis in a community hospital (group A, n=99); thrombolysis during immediate transportation for coronary angioplasty (group B, n=100); and immediate transportation for coronary angioplasty without thrombolysis (group C, n=101). RESULTS: Total mortality rates in group A, B and C patients were 18%, 12% and 13%, respectively (not significant). Nonfatal reinfarction occurred in 12%, 6% and 3% of patients, respectively (P<0.05). The combined endpoint (total mortality and nonfatal reinfarction rate) was reported in 30%, 18% and 16% of patients, respectively (P<0.05). In patients randomized within 2 h of the onset of symptoms, mortality rates were 18%, 3% and 8%, respectively (P<0.05). Additional revascularization procedures (percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, coronary artery bypass graft surgery) were performed in 35%, 14% and 15% of patients, respectively (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Primary angioplasty (even if delayed due to patient transportation to an interventional centre) is associated with better short- and long-term clinical outcomes than thrombolysis. The combination of the two strategies did not prove superior to coronary angioplasty alone. However, it may be superior in a subset of patients with early admission. The coronary angioplasty strategy decreases the need for revascularization procedures during the subsequent one-year follow-up.     

老年再发与初发心肌梗死患者的临床病理对照分析

目的探讨老年再发心肌梗死与初发心肌梗死患者临床病理的差异。方法对107例尸体解剖证实的老年人心肌梗死分为再发梗死与初发梗死两组(再梗组56例,初发组51例),并进行临床病理对照分析。结果再梗组平均年龄(78.7±9.8)岁大于初发组(72.2±10.4)岁(P=0.0012)。再梗组糖尿病患者30例(53.6%)明显多于初发组12例(23.5%,P=0.0015)。再梗组冠状动脉明显狭窄130支(60.7%,平均2.32支/例),明显多于初发组的84支(39.3%,平均1.65支/例,P=0.0047)。再梗组双支以上明显狭窄共40例(71.4%),多于初发组的27例(52.9%,P=0.031)。再梗组两个部位以上梗死41例(73.2%)多于初发组的27例(52.9%,P=0.0295)。再梗组室壁瘤21例(37.5%)多于初发组的10例(19.6%,P=0.0416)。心脏破裂再梗组7例(12.5%)少于初发组的15例(29.4%,P=0.0306)。再梗组死亡原因以心力衰竭和心律失常多见,为33例(58.9%),而初发组则为20例(39.2%,P=0.0417)。结论老年患者再发心肌梗死的特点可能为患病年龄更大,并发糖尿病者多,冠状动脉多支严重病变常见,心肌梗死范围大,且易形成室壁瘤。     

Role of intracoronary thrombus in acute complications during percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty

Coronary angiograms from 2,372 consecutive patients who underwent percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) were retrospectively reviewed for the presence of intracoronary thrombus (ICT) before dilatation. Patients with evolving acute myocardial infarction and those receiving thrombolytic therapy were excluded from analysis. Coronary artery thrombus was present in 126 patients (6%) (group 1). When compared to 2,246 patients (group 2) without ICT, group 1 had a higher incidence of unstable angina, 74% vs. 66% (less than 0.06), previous myocardial infarction, 59% vs. 37% (P less than .0001), and history of a recent myocardial infarction, 28% vs. 9% (P less than .0001). Patients with predilatation intracoronary thrombus had a higher risk for acute occlusion, 6% vs. 2% (P less than .002); however, the incidence of emergency coronary bypass surgery and myocardial infarction was similar in both groups. Therefore, the presence of predilatation intracoronary thrombus heralds an increased risk of acute occlusion, but not myocardial infarction or emergency coronary artery bypass surgery.     

Coronary angioplasty after intravenous streptokinase in acute myocardial infarction: influence of restenosis on clinical outcome and left ventricular function

The importance of recurrence of stenosis on clinical outcome and left ventricular function was studied in a consecutive series of patients with acute evolving myocardial infarction (maximal duration of pain 4 h) and thrombolysis (1.5 x 10(6) units of streptokinase intravenously over 60 min) with recanalized single-vessel disease and subsequent successful coronary angioplasty. Coronary angioplasty was performed in 76 patients between 24 hours and 8 days (mean interval 3.3 days) after thrombolysis and was successful in 86% (65/76). The in-hospital reinfarction rate was 5.2% (2 acute and 2 in-hospital reinfarctions). Repeat angiography after a mean interval of 5.9 months revealed a 39% (24/62) restenosis rate (21 restenoses, 3 reocclusions). Restenoses were associated with significantly more clinical complaints (21% vs. 62%; p less than 0.001). Left ventricular function analysis showed significant improvement in the mean global ejection fraction (6.6 +/- 6.0%; p less than 0.001) and mean regional wall motion of the infarct zone (6.2 +/- 8.2%; p less than 0.01) only in patients without restenosis. Recovery of left ventricular function was more evident in inferior than in anterior wall infarctions. In contrast, patients with restenosis had no change in left ventricular function. Thus, the present study demonstrates the adverse influence of restenosis on recovery of left ventricular function and clinical outcome.     

Prevalence of normal coronary angiography in the acute phase of suspected ST-elevation myocardial infarction: experience from the PRAGUE studies

BACKGROUND: Acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction in patients with normal coronary arteries has previously been described, but coronary angiography in these patients was performed after the acute phase of the infarction. It is possible that these patients did not have normal angiograms during the acute phase (transient coronary thrombosis or spasm were usually suspected to be the cause). Information on the prevalence of truly normal coronary angiograms during the acute phase of a suspected ST-elevation myocardial infarction is lacking. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The Primary Angioplasty in patients transferred from General community hospitals to specialized PTCA Units with or without Emergency thrombolysis-1 (PRAGUE-1) and PRAGUE-2 studies enrolled 1150 patients with ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction, in whom 625 coronary angiograms were performed within 2 h of the initial electrocardiogram. A simultaneous registry included an additional 379 coronary angiograms performed during the ST-elevation phase of a suspected myocardial infarction. Thus, a total of 1004 angiograms were retrospectively analyzed. A normal coronary angiogram was defined as one with the absence of any visible angiographic signs of atherosclerosis, thrombosis or spontaneous spasm. RESULTS: Normal coronary angiograms were obtained for 26 patients (2.6%). Among these, the diagnosis at discharge was a small myocardial infarction in seven patients (0.7%), acute (peri)myocarditis in five patients, dilated cardiomyopathy in four patients, hypertension with left ventricular hypertrophy in three patients, pulmonary embolism in two patients and misinterpretation of the electrocardiogram (ie, no cardiac disease) in five patients. Seven patients with small infarctions underwent angiography within 30 min to 90 min of complete relief of the signs of acute ischemia, and thus, angiograms during pain were not taken. None of the 898 patients catheterized during ongoing symptoms of ischemia had a normal coronary angiogram. Spontaneous coronary spasm as the only cause (without underlying coronary atherosclerosis) for the evolving infarction was not seen among these 898 patients. Thus, the causes of the seven small infarcts in patients with normal angiograms remain uncertain. CONCLUSIONS: The observed prevalence of normal coronary angiography in patients presenting with acute chest pain and ST elevations was 2.6%. Most of these cases were misdiagnoses, not infarctions. A normal angiogram during a biochemically confirmed infarction is extremely rare (0.7%) and was not seen during the ongoing symptoms of ischemia.     

Improving results of bailout coronary stenting after failed balloon angioplasty

Stent implantation can be a valuable alternative to emergent bypass surgery to treat established or threatening abrupt closure following coronary balloon angioplasty. To evaluate several sequentially introduced changes in our practice of bail-out stenting, we compared the first (group I) and second half (group II) of our single center experience (n = 88). Use of bailout stenting increased over time (2% of all angioplasty procedures in group I vs. 6% in group II, P < 0.001), more often to prevent rather than to reverse abrupt closure. Technical success of stent implantation was unchanged (95% vs. 93%), and there was a decreasing trend for stent thrombosis (14% vs. 5%), in-hospital death (5% vs. 2%), Q-wave myocardial infarction (9% vs. 7%), and requirement for surgery (9% vs. 7%). The incidence of non-Q-wave myocardial infarction (29% vs. 7% P < 0.01), bleeding complications (27% vs. 7% P < 0.01), and hospital stay duration (11 ± 11 vs. 8 ± 5 days P < 0.05) decreased. Our data suggest that coronary stent implantation is currently an effective stand-alone bailout procedure for a large majority of failed angioplasty procedures. © 1994 Wiley-Liss,Inc..     

孤立性左冠状动脉主干狭窄的诊治分析

目的分析孤立性左冠状动脉主干(左主干)狭窄的临床特点、造影所见和治疗方法.方法根据冠状动脉造影病变特点将129例左主干狭窄患者分为两组:孤立性左主干狭窄组7例;左主干合并一支或以上主要冠状动脉支狭窄组122例,对比分析两组间临床特点、造影所见和治疗方法.结果孤立性左冠状动脉主干狭窄的检出率为0.16%.6例表现为不稳定型心绞痛,1例为急性前壁心肌梗死.左主干狭窄部位:开口部4例,中部2例,叉口部1例.4例行外科手术,3例行冠状动脉支架术.与复合病变组相比较,孤立性左主干狭窄组女性的比例较高(57.1%vs20.5%,P<0.05),平均年龄较小[(52.3±5.1)岁vs(64.2±7.8)岁,P<0.001];开口部狭窄多见(57.1%vs17.2%,P<0.05).结论孤立性左冠状动脉主干狭窄以女性多见,以开口部狭窄多见,可选择外科和介入治疗.     

Incidence and clinical significance of distal embolization during primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction.

AIMS: Although recognized as an important feature of atherosclerotic coronary disease, little is known about the frequency and prognostic importance of distal embolization during primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction. METHODS AND RESULTS: As part of a randomized trial of thrombolysis vs primary angioplasty, 178 patients with acute myocardial infarction were treated with primary angioplasty. In these patients the occurrence of distal embolization after angioplasty was assessed. Embolization was defined as a distal filling defect with an abrupt 'cutoff' in one of the peripheral coronary artery branches of the infarct-related vessel, distal to the site of angioplasty. We analysed myocardial blush grade, ST-T segment elevation resolution, enzymatic infarct size and left ventricular ejection fraction in patients with and without distal embolization. Clinical information was collected for a mean of 5 years. Distal embolization was present in 27 patients (15.2%). Mean age and gender were not different from patients without distal embolization. Angiographic success (thrombolyis in myocardial infarction flow grade 3 and residual stenosis <50%) after primary angioplasty was less frequently observed in patients with distal embolization (70% vs 90%, P<0.01). Myocardial blush and ST-T segment elevation resolution after angioplasty were reduced when distal embolization was present. Patients with distal embolization had a larger enzymatic infarct size (mean cumulative lactate dehydrogenase measured over 72 h, 1612 vs 847, P<0.05) and a lower left ventricle ejection fraction at discharge (42% vs 51%, P<0.01). Long-term mortality was higher in patients with distal embolization (44% vs 9%, P<0.001). CONCLUSION: Distal embolization in patients treated with primary angioplasty is visible on the coronary angiogram in 15.2% of patients. It is related to reduced myocardial reperfusion, more extensive myocardial damage and a poor prognosis. Additional pharmacological interventions and/ or mechanical devices should be studied to prevent and/or treat distal embolization.     

Predictors of short term clinical and angiographic outcome after coronary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction

Coronary angioplasty is an effective method to achieve myocardial reperfusion in acute myocardial infarction (AMI). We reviewed our experience in 132 patients (pts) who underwent percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) of a totally occluded infarct-related artery (IRA) within 24 h after the onset of symptoms (mean delay 10±7 h), in order to identify the predictors of primary success and of major complications. PTCA was successfully performed in 113 patients (86%). Failure without complications occurred in 12 patients (8.4%); untoward events (death and emergency CABG) occurred in seven patients (5.3%). Pts in the failure group were more likely to have cardiogenic shock (53 vs. 8.8%, P<.0005), longer time to reperfusion (15±6 vs. 9±6 h, P<.0005), lower ejection fraction (EF) (42±16 vs. 54±12%, P<.0005), multivessel disease (74 vs. 43%, P<.03), and a smaller IRA diameter (2.8±0.6 vs. 3.1± 0.6 mm, P<.03). Sex, age, previous bypass surgery, previous thrombolytic treatment, IRA, and infarct location were similar in both groups. Absence of cardiogenic shock (P<.0001), decreasing time to reperfusion (P<.005) and increasing EF (P<.02) were independent predictors of successful PTCA. Presence of cardiogenic shock (P<.0001) and decreasing EF (<.05) were independent predictors of untoward events. Repeat angiography was performed 24 h after the procedure in the success group. Angiographic deterioration (stenosis ? 50% and/or TIMI flow grade ? 1) was present in 18 pts (16%), among whose 5 pts (4.4%) had re-occlusion of the IRA. Pts with early angiographic deterioration were more likely to have a lower IRA diameter (2.8±0.5 vs. 3.1±0.6 mm, P<.02). Conclusion: Emergency PTCA is an effective method for establishing reperfusion in AMI. Pts with high-risk baseline characteristics show the highest rate of untoward events, but are the most likely to benefit from aggressive reperfusion therapy. © 1995 Wiley-Liss, inc.     

Long-term outcome after primary angioplasty: report from the primary angioplasty in myocardial infarction (PAMI-I) trial

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to compare the two-year outcome after primary percutaneous coronary angioplasty or thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction. BACKGROUND: Primary angioplasty, that is, angioplasty without antecedent thrombolytic therapy, has been shown to be an effective reperfusion modality for patients suffering an acute myocardial infarction. This report reviews the two-year clinical outcome of patients randomized in the Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction trial. METHODS: At 12 clinical centers, 395 patients who presented within 12 h of the onset of myocardial infarction were randomized to undergo primary angioplasty (195 patients) or to receive tissue-type plasminogen activator (t-PA) (200 patients) followed by conservative care. Patients were followed by physician visits, phone call, letter and review of hospital records for any hospital admission at one month, six months, one year and two years. RESULTS: At two years, patients undergoing primary angioplasty had less recurrent ischemia (36.4% vs. 48% for t-PA, p = 0.026), lower reintervention rates (27.2% vs. 46.5% for t-PA, p < 0.0001) and reduced hospital readmission rates (58.5% vs. 69.0% for t-PA, p = 0.035). The combined end point of death or reinfarction was 14.9% for angioplasty versus 23% for t-PA, p = 0.034. Multivariate analysis found angioplasty to be independently predictive of a reduction in death, reinfarction or target vessel revascularization (p = 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The initial benefit of primary angioplasty performed by experienced operators is maintained over a two-year follow-up period with improved infarct-free survival and reduced rate of reintervention.     

早期口服尼可地尔在老年急性 ST 段抬高心肌梗死急诊 PCI 中的效果

目的 通过观察早期口服尼可地尔对老年急性ST段抬高心肌梗死（STEMI）患者急诊PCI术后的心肌受损程度、冠脉微循环灌注水平、心脏功能的影响及MACE,探讨尼可地尔对老年急性ST段抬高心肌梗死患者心肌保护作用。方法 2013.7—2015.1入院的115例行急诊PCI的老年STEMI患者（>60岁）,随机分为尼可地尔组57例和对照组58例,尼可地尔组入院确诊后即刻顿服尼可地尔15mg,对照组仅行再灌注治疗,尼可地尔组术后继续口服尼可地尔5mg TID,而对照组口服单硝酸异山梨酯片20mg TID。监测手术前后心肌损伤标志物肌钙蛋白。术中记录所有病人梗死相关动脉情况、PCI后校正TIMI帧数（CTFC）及心肌灌注分级（TMP)。PCI术后一周行超声心动图检查,记录左室射血分数（LVEF）及左室舒张末期内径（LVEDD）。记录PCI术后30d主要不良心脏事件（MACE）。结果 两组患者PCI术后12小时、24小时静脉血cTnI检测结果均较术前明显升高,但均明显低于对照组（P<0.05）。尼可地尔组术后校正的TIMI帧数（CTFC）小于对照组（29.64±3.18 vs 32.70±4.55, P<0.05）;心肌灌注分级TMP2级以上的比例尼可地尔组高于对照组（78.95% vs 62.07%, P<0.05）。尼可地尔组病人的射血分数高于对照组（54.36±5.03vs. 51.09±4.45,P<0.05）。PCI术后30d尼可地尔组MACE发生率低于对照组（7.02% vs 20.69%, P<0.05）。结论：早期口服尼可地尔可减轻老年急性ST段抬高心肌梗死患者急诊PCI术后的心肌受损程度,改善心肌微循环灌注,保护左心室功能,减少了MACE事件发生。     

Early ventricular fibrillation in patients with acute myocardial infarction: correlation with coronary angiographic findings

To define coronary angiographic characteristics of patientsexperiencing early primary ventricular fibrillation (VF) inthe acute phase of myocardial infarction we studied 266 consecutivepatients without clinical evidence of heart failure. Twenty-sixpatients (group 1) experienced early (< 12 h from the onsetof symptoms of myocardial infarction) primary VF whereas 240patients (group 2) with the same clinical characteristics servedas an appropriately matched cohort. All patients were catheterizedbefore or soon after hospital discharge (1 to 8 weeks afterthe acute event). There was no significant difference in left ventricular ejectionfraction between the two groups of patients (39.6±6%vs 36.9±8%, P = ns). Patients with early VF had a significantlygreater number of diseased vessels than those without VF (3.38±1.05vs 2.03±1.25. P <0.001) and a higher coronary arteriographicGensini score (29.31±4.80 vs 20.16±4.14, P <0.001).The left anterior descending coronary artery was identifiedas the infarct-related vessel in 53.6% of group 1 vs 44.5% ofgroup 2 patients (P <0.05). The mean maximal serum creatinekinase values were not significantly different (1897±1062vs 1426 ±839 IU.l–1, P=ns) between the two groups. These data indicate that patients with early primary VF in thesetting of acute myocardial infarction may have more extensivecoronary artery disease than similar patients without VF. Aworse prognosis could be anticipated for these patients on thebasis of worse coronary anatomy. A more aggressive therapeuticapproach with routine coronary angiography before hospital dischargecould reasonably be justified for patients with early primaryVF complicating acute myocardial infarction.     

Retrospective comparative study of primary intracoronary stenting versus balloon angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction

Balloon angioplasty has been shown to be an effective therapy for the treatment of acute myocardial infarction but is associated with a high restenosis rate, substantial early recoil, persistent thrombus and need for intracoronary thrombolysis, and a high rate of reclosure. Because many of the limitations of balloon angioplasty in the noninfarction setting are addressed by intracoronary stenting, we examined the results of primary stenting of 18 consecutive patients treated for acute myocardial infarction, and compared the results to those achieved with primary balloon angioplasty in 18 prior cases. Despite the presence of thrombus prior to angioplasty in 13 of the stented patients, no intracoronary thrombolytic therapy was required. Mean percent stenosis using quantitative coronary angiography was 17.7 ± 10.2% after primary stenting compared with 43.7 ± 20.3% after primary balloon angioplasty (P < .001). One stent patient who had all anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapy withdrawn early suffered subacute thrombosis. Patients were followed up to 3 yr. Complications were similar in the two groups. We conclude that primary stenting for acute myocardial infarction results in superior angiographic appearance as well as resolution of thrombus without the need for routine thrombolysis, and is associated with a low complication rate and excellent short-term clinical patency. Cathet. Cardiovasc. Diagn. 40:235–239, 1997. © 1997 Wiley-Liss, Inc.