Growth hormone-releasing hormone infusion in patients with active acromegaly

To determine GH-releasing hormone (GHRH)-stimulated GH secretion in patients with active acromegaly, nine patients received a 50-microgram GHRH-(1-44) bolus dose followed by a 2-h infusion with 100 micrograms GHRH/h, after which a second 50-microgram GHRH bolus dose was given. Serum GH, PRL, and immunoreactive GHRH levels were measured from 2 h before to 1 h after the end of the infusion and compared with hormone levels in six normal subjects subjected to the same protocol. In addition, seven of the nine acromegalic patients received 100 micrograms GHRH as an iv bolus dose, followed by a 2-h saline infusion on a different day. After the 100-micrograms GHRH bolus dose, the mean GH level increased from 55.9 +/- 18.0 (+/- SE) to 148.5 +/- 40.0 ng/ml within 15 min. Thereafter, GH levels decreased and were significantly lower at 90 and 120 min compared to the peak level 15 min after GHRH injection. After the 50-micrograms GHRH bolus dose, all acromegalic patients except two also had a clear-cut rise of GH levels, with the mean GH level increasing from 37.5 +/- 13.2 to 108.4 +/- 55.0 ng/ml at 60 min. Thereafter, elevated GH levels were sustained in the acromegalic patients throughout the GHRH infusion. In contrast, normal subjects had a significant decrease in the initially elevated GH levels, despite continuous GHRH infusion. There were no significant differences between PRL secretion and immunoreactive GHRH levels in either group. These findings suggest that patients with active acromegaly not only have elevated basal GH levels, but also have a greater ready releasable GH pool and/or accelerated GH turnover compared to those of normal subjects, which cannot be exhausted by a 2-h GHRH infusion.     

Continuous infusion of growth hormone-releasing factor: effects on pulsatile growth hormone secretion in normal rats

The effects of a continuous infusion of growth hormone-releasing factor (GRF) on pulsatile growth hormone (GH) secretion were studied in conscious, freely moving rats. Male Sprague-Dawley rats were prepared with 2 indwelling venous catheters and were then housed individually for 6-16 days in isolation chambers. After this period, normal saline, 1.5 microgram/h GRF or 15 micrograms/h GRF were continuously infused for 8 or 31 h via one of the catheters. Blood samples were drawn at approximately 20-min intervals via the other catheter during the last 6-7 h of the infusion. Plasma GH concentrations were determined by RIA. Saline-treated animals exhibited the typical pattern of spontaneous GH pulses. The frequency of GH pulses in animals infused with either dose of GRF was not different from that of the saline-infused rats. Likewise, trough GH concentrations were similar in all three treatment groups. However, peak GH concentrations in the rats receiving the 15-micrograms/h GRF infusion were remarkably higher than the concentrations observed in the other two groups, regardless of the duration of the infusion. This resulted in mean GH concentrations being significantly higher (p less than 0.01) in the 15-micrograms/h GRF-infused rats. These results demonstrate that pituitary episodic GH secretion continues even in the presence of a continuous GRF stimulation.     

Effects of growth hormone-releasing factor on growth hormone secretion in acromegaly

Twenty-nine patients with acromegaly (8 untreated and 21 previously treated in various ways) and 16 normal men were given iv bolus doses of human pancreatic tumor GH-releasing factor (hpGRF-40). Twenty-five of the 29 patients responded to hpGRF-40 with elevations of plasma GH. The magnitude of the responses varied widely. Responses of untreated patients were generally similar to those of the normal subjects. Previously treated patients had a significantly lower response than normal individuals [change in GH, 7.5 +/- 1.8 vs. 42.0 +/- 11.0 ng/ml (mean +/- SEM); P less than 0.01], and 4 patients who had received radiation therapy failed to respond to hpGRF-40. There was no significant correlation between the magnitude of the response and patients' age, sex, baseline GH levels, GH responsiveness of TRH, or GH suppression after oral glucose administration. Patients studied both pre- and postoperatively were responsive to hpGRF-40 at all times tested, but the magnitude of the response decreased after successful surgical removal of the adenoma. Thus, most patients with treated or untreated acromegaly respond to hpGRF-40, but their responses do not clearly distinguish them from normal subjects. GH-releasing hormone testing is unlikely to replace other endocrine tests available for the diagnosis and evaluation of acromegaly.     

Thyrotropin-releasing hormone increases serum levels of growth hormone-releasing hormone and growth hormone in patients with acromegaly.

The effect of intravenous injection of thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH) on the plasma concentrations of growth hormone (GH) and growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) was studied in seven patients with acromegaly and in five control subjects. TRH had no effect on plasma GH or GHRH in the five control subjects. A 'paradoxical' increase in plasma GH in response to TRH was observed in four of the seven patients with acromegaly. In these four patients plasma GHRH also increased in response to TRH. No TRH-induced increase in GHRH levels was observed in the other three patients with acromegaly who did not display an increase in GH in response to TRH. The present results imply that GHRH may be involved in the plasma GH response to TRH in patients with acromegaly.     

Impaired secretion of growth hormone-releasing hormone, growth hormone and IGF-I in elderly men

The GHRH test and L-dopa test were performed in 12 normal young men (24.1 +/- 1.1 years) and 12 normal elderly men (77.8 +/- 1.4 years) to investigate age-related changes in secretion of GHRH, GH and IGF-I. The basal plasma levels of GHRH and GH were not significantly different in young and elderly men, but the basal plasma level of IGF-I was higher in the young men (159.0 +/- 11.7 vs 86.7 +/- 11.6 micrograms/l). The area under the curve for plasma GH in the GHRH test was less in the elderly group (35.1 +/- 5.9 vs 11.2 +/- 2.1 micrograms.h-1.l-1, p less than 0.001). The AUCs for the plasma GHRH and GH responses in the L-dopa test in young and elderly men were 32.0 +/- 2.7 vs 20.3 +/- 1.8 ng.h-1.l-1 (p less than 0.001), and 21.8 +/- 4.6 vs 5.4 +/- 1.1 micrograms.h-1.l-1 (p less than 0.01), respectively, indicating decreased releases of GHRH and GH in the elderly. Correlations between the AUCs for plasma GHRH and GH responses in L-dopa were found in both groups, but the ratio of the AUCs for GH/GHRH was lower in the elderly group. The elderly group showed a significant correlation between the basal plasma IGF-I level and the AUCs for plasma GH in the GHRH and L-dopa tests. These results suggest that elderly men have a decreased reserve of hypothalamic GHRH, resulting in secondarily impaired GH release, which may lead to a lower level of IGF-I than in young men.     

Secretion of growth hormone-releasing hormone in patients with idiopathic pituitary dwarfism and acromegaly

The plasma levels of immunoreactive-GHRH in patients with idiopathic pituitary dwarfism and acromegaly were studied in the basal state and during various tests by a sensitive and specific RIA. The fasting plasma GHRH level in 22 patients with idiopathic pituitary dwarfism was 6.3 +/- 2.3 ng/l (mean +/- SD), which was significantly lower than that in normal children (9.8 +/- 2.8 ng/l, N = 21), and eight of them had undetectable concentrations (less than 4.0 ng/l). Little or no response of plasma GHRH to oral administration of L-dopa was observed in 7 of 10 pituitary dwarfs, and 3 of the 7 patients showed a response of plasma GH to iv administration of GHRH (1 microgram/kg). These findings suggest that one of the causes of idiopathic pituitary dwarfism is insufficient GHRH release from the hypothalamus. The fasting plasma GHRH level in 14 patients with acromegaly and one patient with gigantism was 8.0 +/- 3.9 ng/l, which was slightly lower than that in normal adults (10.4 +/- 4.1 ng/l, N = 72). One acromegalic patient with multiple endocrine neoplasia type I had a high level of plasma GHRH (270 ng/l) with no change in response to L-dopa and TRH test. In 3 untreated patients with acromegaly L-dopa did not induce any response of plasma GHRH in spite of inconsistent GH release, and in 4 patients with acromegaly, TRH evoked no response of plasma GHRH in spite of a marked GH release, suggesting that the GH responses are not mediated by hypothalamic GHRH.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Characterization of growth hormone-releasing hormone receptors in pituitary adenomas from patients with acromegaly

GHRH receptors in pituitary adenoma cell membranes from five patients with acromegaly were characterized using [125I] [His1,Nle27]GHRH-(1-32)NH2 ([125I]GHRHa) as a ligand. Specific binding of [125I]GHRHa to adenoma cell membranes was maximal within 20 min at 24 C, remained stable for 60 min, and was reversible in the presence of 500 nmol/L human GHRH-(1-44)NH2 (hGHRH). The specific binding increased linearly with 10-160 micrograms cell membrane protein. This binding was inhibited by 10(-11)-10(-6) mol/L hGHRH in a dose-dependent manner, with an ID50 of 0.20 nmol/L, but not by 10(-7) mol/L vasoactive intestinal peptide, glucagon, somatostatin-14, somatostatin-28, TRH, LHRH, and CRH. The specific binding of [125I]GHRHa to the membranes was saturable, and Scatchard analysis of the data revealed an apparent single class of high affinity GHRH receptors in five adenomas from acromegalic patients; the mean dissociation constant was 0.30 +/- 0.07 (+/- SE) nmol/L, and the mean maximal binding capacity was 26.7 +/- 7.0 (+/- SE) fmol/mg protein. In three nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas, GHRH receptors were not detected. The plasma GH response to hGHRH (100 micrograms) injection was studied in four acromegalic patients before surgery. Plasma GH levels increased variably in response to hGHRH injection in all four patients. However, there was no correlation between the characteristics of the tumor GHRH receptors and plasma GH responsiveness in these patients. We conclude that pituitary GH-secreting adenomas have specific GHRH receptors. Exogenously administered GHRH presumably acts via these receptors, but the variations in plasma GH responsiveness to hGHRH in these patients cannot be directly related to the variations in binding characteristics of the GHRH receptors on the GH-secreting adenoma cells.     

Regulation of pulsatile growth hormone secretion by fasting in normal subjects and patients with acromegaly.

In acromegaly, GH hypersecretion occurs despite elevated insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) levels, implying defective IGF-I feedback. To study the possible mechanisms of defective IGF-I negative feedback in acromegaly, we assessed parameters of pulsatile GH secretion during fasting-induced decrease in plasma IGF-I. Seven patients with active acromegaly and six normal controls were fasted for 6 days and GH secretory profiles were obtained by frequent (every 10 min) blood sampling for 24 h and analyzed by Cluster. Fasting resulted in similar decreases in IGF-I, body weight, and blood glucose levels, and increases in free fatty acid and beta-hydroxybutyrate in all subjects. Normal subjects showed increases in 24-h total and pulsatile GH production, GH pulse frequency, maximal pulse amplitude, interpulse and nadir levels, implying suppression of hypothalamic somatostatin secretion and increase in GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) pulse frequency. In acromegalic patients, GH (and, by inference, GHRH) pulse frequency was unchanged. Three patients had increases in GH production, interpulse, and nadir levels similar to the normals while the other four had no change or paradoxical decreases in these parameters. Percentage change in GH production was highly correlated with percentage change in interpulse and nadir levels in both normals and patients. Mean GH response to GHRH (0.33 micrograms/kg iv) did not change significantly in any group as a result of fasting. Our data suggest that in healthy humans IGF-I negative feedback on GH secretion involves suppression of GHRH pulse frequency. GH (and, by inference, GHRH) pulse frequency is resistant to decrease in IGF-I in acromegaly, suggesting that lowered sensitivity of GHRH neurons to IGF-I may be the mechanism of high GH pulse frequency in this disease.     

The effects of growth hormone-releasing factor (GRF) and dopamine on growth hormone (GH) secretion in acromegaly

GRF (1-40), dopamine (DA), DA plus GRF and placebo were administered to 6 acromegalic patients. The GRF administration induced a highly variable GH release (GH delta % 167.3 +/- 21.4; mean +/- SE). GRF did not provoke any change in PRL serum levels. During simultaneous GRF and DA administration GH release was found to be reduced (GH delta % 80.2 +/- 17.8) compared to that observed for a corresponding period of time after GRF alone (p less than 0.05). Our data underscore that in acromegaly the DA tonus inhibits GH secretion after GRF by acting directly at the pituitary level.     

Calcitonin inhibition of growth hormone-releasing hormone-induced GH secretion in normal men

Calcitonin has been shown to modulate pituitary hormone secretion in a variety of ways. In this study we examined the effects of a salmon calcitonin infusion on GHRH-induced GH secretion in 5 normal men. In addition, in vitro experiments were performed using primary cultures of rat anterior pituitary cells in order to examine whether there is a direct pituitary effect of CT. Infusion of CT significantly blunted the GH response to GHRH in all subjects without affecting basal GH secretion or plasma calcium levels. Infusion of CT was accompanied by significant increases in ACTH, beta-endorphin, cortisol and free fatty acid levels, and by a significant decrease in serum insulin levels. The addition of CT to primary cultures of rat pituitary cells did not alter basal or stimulated secretion of GH or ACTH. These results indicate that: 1) CT blunts the GH response to GHRH; 2) CT infusion results in the stimulation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, and 3) this effect is probably exerted at the hypothalamic level, since no direct activity of CT was documented in vitro on either GH or ACTH secretion.     

Acute effects of a single administration of dexamethasone on basal and growth hormone-releasing hormone stimulated GH secretion in acromegaly

A single administration of dexamethasone causes both an early stimulatory and a late inhibitory effect on GH secretion in normal subjects. OBJECTIVE We investigated the effects of a single administration of dexamethasone on basal and GH-releasing hormone-stimulated GH secretion in eight patients with active acromegaly. DESIGN On three different days the patients received 4 mg i.v. dexamethasone, 1 μg/kg body weight GH-releasing hormone 1-29, or matched placebos in different order. PATIENTS Eight subjects with active acromegaly, five of whom had not been treated previously, while the other three had received octreotide therapy which was stopped at least 7 days before testing. MEASUREMENTS Serum GH levels were measured in duplicate by a commercially available RIA kit. RESULTS Dexamethasone administration caused a significant decline of mean ± SE GH levels from 51.8 ± 13.8 to 30.0 ± 9.2 mU/l at 180 minutes, that was not influenced by placebo administration at 180 minutes. On the contrary, when GH-releasing hormone substituted placebo administration, GH levels increased from 34.0 ± 9.8 mU/l at 180 minutes to 56.0 ± 15.6 mU/l at 195 minutes. The GH increase was higher when GH-releasing hormone was given without dexamethasone pretreatment (from 52.4 ± 13.0 mU/l at 180 minutes to 86.4 ± 25.4 mU/l at 195 minutes). Analysis of the GH area under the curve confirmed the significant inhibition of GH secretion after dexamethasone administration and the significant reduction of the GH response to GH-releasing hormone in the study with dexamethasone pretreatment. CONCLUSIONS At variance with data in normal subjects, acute i.v. administration of dexamethasone inhibits basal GH secretion and partially suppresses the GH response to GH-releasing hormone in acromegaly. Both alterations in the regulatory mechanism of adenomatous cells and perturbations of hypothalamic regulatory influences, induced by the state of chronic GH hypersecretion, are likely explanations of the different response to dexamethasone.     

Acute effects of testosterone infusion and naloxone on luteinizing hormone secretion in normal men.

To evaluate the role of endogenous opioid pathways in the acute suppression of LH secretion by testosterone (T) infusion in men, we studied eight normal healthy volunteers who received a saline infusion, followed 1 week later by a T infusion (960 nmol/h) starting at 1000 h and lasting for 33 h. After 2 h of infusion (both saline and T), four iv boluses of saline were given hourly, and after 26 h of infusion, four hourly iv boluses of naloxone were given. Blood was obtained every 15 min for LH and every 30 min for T. T infusion increased the mean plasma T concentration 2.1-fold (18.7 +/- 2.1 to 39.5 +/- 3.5 nmol/L, saline vs. T infusion, P < 0.01). The mean plasma LH concentration was 7.9 +/- 0.5 IU/L during the saline control study and was decreased to 6.9 +/- 0.6 IU/L by the infusion of T (P < 0.05). LH pulse frequency was similar during both saline and T infusions (0.48 +/- 0.02 vs. 0.43 +/- 0.04 pulses/man.h, saline vs. T infusion). The mean LH pulse amplitude decreased from 4.3 +/- 0.4 IU/L during saline infusion to 3.3 +/- 0.2 IU/L during T infusion (P < 0.05). The administration of naloxone increased the mean plasma LH concentration significantly during saline infusion (7.6 +/- 0.4 to 10.0 +/- 0.9 IU/L, saline vs. naloxone boluses, P < 0.01), but not during T infusion (6.9 +/- 0.6 vs. 7.3 +/- 0.6 IU/L). LH pulse frequency increased significantly after the administration of naloxone during both saline and T infusions (0.54 +/- 0.04 to 0.71 +/- 0.08 pulses/man.h, saline vs. naloxone boluses during saline infusion, and 0.46 +/- 0.08 to 0.60 +/- 0.07 pulses/man.h during T infusion; P < 0.05). LH pulse amplitude was suppressed by T infusion, but administration of naloxone did not reverse this suppression. The mean amplitude of the LH response to exogenous GnRH (250 ng/kg) was decreased by T infusion from 48 +/- 13.5 to 31.2 +/- 8.5 IU/L (P < 0.01). Therefore, in men, the administration of naloxone increases LH pulse frequency during both saline and T infusions, but the acute suppression of LH pulse amplitude seen with T infusion was not reversed by naloxone. This pattern contrasts sharply with the effects of T infusion in pubertal boys, as elucidated by our earlier studies. The negative feedback effects of T on LH secretion are primarily hypothalamic in early pubertal boys and change to pituitary suppression in men.     

The role of endogenous growth hormone-releasing hormone in acromegaly

CONTEXT: Some indirect evidence suggests hypothalamic control of GH secretion in acromegaly. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study is to examine whether GH secretion in acromegaly is dependent on endogenous GHRH. PATIENTS AND STUDY DESIGN: We studied eight patients with untreated acromegaly due to a GH-producing pituitary tumor. All patients received an iv infusion of normal saline for 24 h and GHRH-antagonist (GHRH-ant) at 50 microg/kg x h for 7 d. GH was measured every 10 min for 24 h during the normal saline infusion and on the last day of the GHRH-ant infusion. A group of nine different patients with untreated acromegaly served as the control group and underwent blood sampling for GH every 10 min for two 24-h periods to assess the day-to-day variability of GH secretion. SETTING: The study was set in a university referral center. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Twenty-four-hour mean GH was the main outcome measured. RESULTS: In six of eight subjects treated with GHRH-ant, 24-h mean GH decreased by 5.8-30.0% during iv GHRH-ant and, in three subjects, the change in the 24-h mean GH was greater than the upper limit of the 95% confidence interval of the spontaneous day-to-day variability of the mean GH in patients with acromegaly. Based on the binomial distribution, the probability of this magnitude of change to occur in three of eight subjects by chance alone is 0.0008. CONCLUSION: In some patients with acromegaly due to a pituitary adenoma, GH secretion is under partial control by endogenous GHRH.     

Diurnal administration of human growth hormone-releasing factor does not modify sleep and sleep-related growth hormone secretion in normal young men

hGRF (iv 50 micrograms) was administered to 6 normal young adult males at 09.00 and 20.00 h on different days. Nocturnal GH secretion was monitored during polygraphic sleep recordings on both control nights and nights following hGRF administration. Sleep-related GH secretion and sleep parameters were not affected by diurnal hGRF administration.     

Sex-related naloxone influence on growth hormone-releasing hormone-induced growth hormone secretion in normal subjects

The effect of opiate-receptor antagonist naloxone on growth hormone (GH) release after growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) 1-44 administration was investigated in ten normal men and 18 normal women during different phases of their menstrual cycle. Naloxone was infused at a rate of 1.6 mg/h in women and 1.6- and 3.2 mg/h in men, starting one hour before GHRH administration (50 micrograms iv as a bolus). On different day sessions, naloxone, GHRH, or saline were administered as controls. Naloxone infusion reduced the GHRH-induced GH release in normal women. The mean % inhibition of peak GH response was 83% during follicular phase, 46.5% during periovulatory phase, and 77.6% during luteal phase. On the contrary, in normal men, both doses of naloxone infusion were ineffective in blunting the GH response to GHRH. Our studies indicate that naloxone infusion was capable of inhibiting GH release induced by direct stimulation with GHRH in normal women, suggesting an opiate-antagonist action at the anterior pituitary level. The absence of such an effect in normal men strongly indicates a sex dependence of naloxone effects and suggests a role of the sexual steroid environment in opioid modulation of pituitary hormone secretion.     

Pyridostigmine blocks the inhibitory effect of glucocorticoids on growth hormone-releasing hormone stimulated growth hormone secretion in normal man

Glucocorticoids have been shown to inhibit GH secretion in normal man when acutely and chronically administered in pharmacological amounts. Pyridostigmine (PD), an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor, is able to elicit GH secretion when administered alone and to enhance the GH response to GHRH in normal subjects probably via a decrease in the hypothalamic release of somatostatin. The aim of the present study was to investigate the influence of glucocorticoids on the GH response to PD administered either alone or in combination with GHRH in normal adult subjects. Six healthy adult volunteers underwent six experimental protocols. They received 1) human (h) GHRH(1-29)NH2, 100 micrograms injected as an iv bolus; 2) cortisone acetate, 50 mg administered orally (po) 60 min before an hGHRH iv bolus injection; 3) PD, 120 mg administered po, 60 min before an hGHRH iv bolus injection; 4) PD and cortisone acetate, administered po 60 min before an hGHRH iv bolus injection; 5) PD, administered po 60 min before a saline iv bolus injection; 6) PD and cortisone acetate administered po 60 min before a saline iv bolus injection. Mean GH levels, peak GH levels, and GH area under the curves (AUCs) were significantly lower after GHRH + cortisone as compared to GHRH alone. However, these parameters were not significantly different after PD + GHRH + cortisone when compared to PD + GHRH and after PD + cortisone when compared to PD alone. We conclude that acute administration of pharmacological amounts of glucocorticoids cannot inhibit the GH response to PD alone or in combination with GHRH. Thus, we hypothesize that the inhibitory action of glucocorticoids on the GH response to GHRH in man may be mediated by an enhancement of either somatostatin release by the hypothalamus or somatostatin action on the pituitary.     

Effect of galanin on the growth hormone response to growth hormone-releasing hormone in acromegaly.

Galanin enhances growth hormone (GH)-releasing hormone (GHRH)-stimulated GH secretion in normal man. In acromegaly, circulating GH levels are increased and the GH response to GHRH may be exaggerated. Galanin has been recently shown to decrease circulating GH levels in acromegaly. The aim of our study was to investigate the effects of galanin on the GH response to GHRH in acromegalic subjects. Five acromegalic patients (three men and two women) and seven healthy adult subjects (five men and two women) were studied. GHRH-induced GH secretion was evaluated during a 40-minute intravenous (IV) infusion of saline (100 mL) or porcine galanin (12.5 micrograms/min in 100 mL saline). In normal subjects, delta GH levels after GHRH+porcine galanin administration (47 +/- 7.5 micrograms/L) were significantly higher in comparison to levels obtained with GHRH+saline (21.7 +/- 3.5 micrograms/L, P < .05). In acromegalic patients, GH responses to GHRH (delta GH, 18.8 +/- 8.6 micrograms/L) were not altered by galanin infusion (delta GH, 17.6 +/- 5 micrograms/L). Our results give the first evidence that the same dose of galanin that induces a significant enhancement of the GH response to GHRH in normal subjects has no effect on the GH response to GHRH in acromegalic patients. It can be hypothesized that galanin may interact at the pituitary level with its own receptors expressed by somatotropes independent of GHRH. Failure of galanin to enhance GH response to GHRH in acromegalic patients could be due to a change in function of the galanin receptor on GH-secreting adenomatous cells.