Incisionless revision of post-Roux-en-Y bypass stomal and pouch dilation: multicenter registry results

BackgroundSurgical revision for weight regain after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) has been tempered by the high complication rates associated with standard approaches. Endoluminal revision of stoma and pouch dilation should intuitively confer a better risk profile. However, questions of clinical safety, durability, and weight loss need to be answered. We report our multicenter intraoperative experience and postoperative follow-up to date using the Incisionless Operating Platform for this patient subset.MethodsThe patients who had regained significant weight ≥2 years after RYGB after losing ≥50% of excess body weight after RYGB were endoscopically screened for stomal and/or pouch dilation. Qualified patients underwent incisionless revision using the Incisionless Operating Platform to reduce the stoma and pouch size by placing anchors to create tissue plications. Data on the safety, intraoperative performance, postoperative weight loss, and anchor durability were recorded to date as a part of 2 years of postoperative follow-up.ResultsA total of 116 consecutive patients were prospectively studied. Anchors were successfully placed in 112 (97%) of 116 patients, with an average intraoperative stoma diameter and pouch length reduction of 50% and 44%, respectively. The operating room time averaged 87 minutes. No significant complications occurred. At 6 months after the procedure (n = 96), an average of 32% of weight regain that had occurred after RYGB had been lost. The percentage of excess weight loss averaged 18%. The 12-month esophagogastroduodenoscopy results confirmed the presence of the anchors and durable tissue folds.ConclusionsIncisionless revision of stoma and pouch dilation using the Incisionless Operating Platform can be performed safely. The data to date have demonstrated mild-to-moderate weight loss, and the early 12-month endoscopic images have confirmed anchor durability. Patients were actively followed up to document the long-term durability of this intervention in the entire patient subset.     

Influence of pouch and stoma size on weight loss after gastric bypass

BackgroundEnlargement of the gastric pouch and/or gastrojejunostomy after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is postulated to be the antecedent to suboptimal weight loss or weight regain. The present study evaluated the gastric pouch and stoma dimensions in RYGB patients and correlated them with the weight loss outcomes.MethodsPatients who underwent upper endoscopy for investigation of gastrointestinal symptoms or weight regain after RYGB were identified. The stoma was considered enlarged if >2 cm in diameter and the pouch was considered enlarged if >6 cm long or >5 cm wide. Successful weight loss was defined as excess weight loss >50% or a body mass index decrease to ≤30 kg/m².ResultsA total of 380 patients had nondiagnostic upper endoscopy findings at a mean post-RYGB interval of 5.9 ± 4.0 years. Among these were 175 patients (group A; 87% women) who had successful weight loss and 205 patients (group B; 86% women) who were referred for investigation of weight regain. The pouch and stoma size were normal in most of the patients in group A (63.4%) compared with 28.8% of the patients in group B (P <.001). The most common abnormality was an enlarged stoma. The pouch length, pouch volume, and stoma diameter correlated inversely with excess weight loss. Multivariate analysis identified that the stoma diameter was independently associated with weight regain after RYGB.ConclusionThe current definition of a “normal” size pouch/stoma is associated with optimal weight loss after RYGB, although this might need to be reviewed. Patients who regain weight are likely to have abnormal anatomy, in particular, stoma enlargement. The surgical RYGB technique and methods of evaluating the gastric anatomy in RYGB patients need to be standardized, intraoperatively and postoperatively.     

Gastric bypass pouch and stoma reduction using a transoral endoscopic anchor placement system: A feasibility study

Background Weight regain after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass may be caused by pouch enlargement or dilatation of the gastrojejunostomy (stoma). In order to avoid the substantial morbidity of revisional bariatric surgery, investigators have recently demonstrated the feasibility of reducing stoma diameter using transoral endoscopic suturing techniques. Our aim was to demonstrate the feasibility of performing both pouch and stomal reduction using transoral endoscopically placed tissue anchors in an ex vivo and acute animate model. Methods Part I: We created an ex vivo model of a dilated gastric pouch and stoma using four explanted porcine stomachs. The stomach was divided to create an upper pouch of approx. 100 ml volume, which was reconnected to the lower portion of the stomach (gastric remnant) via an anastomosis of 18 to 20 mm diameter. Endoscopically placed anchors were then used to create plications of the stoma and reduce its diameter. In two stomachs, anchor plications were also used to decrease pouch volume. Pouch volumes and stoma diameters were measured pre- and post-procedure. Part II: A similar experimental model was created in vivo using three pigs. Anchors were placed in the stoma and pouch. The animals were immediately sacrificed and similar measurements were obtained. Results In the ex vivo model, stoma diameter was successfully reduced in all four stomachs by a mean of 8 mm (41%). This represented a mean decrease in cross-sectional area of 65%. Pouch volume was reduced by a mean of 28 ml (30%) in two stomachs. Stomal plications were successfully placed in two of the live animals, with a mean stoma diameter reduction of 11.5 mm (53%). Feasibility of pouch reduction using plicating anchors was confirmed. Conclusions This is the first study to demonstrate the feasibility of using endoscopically placed tissue anchors to reduce both stoma diameter and pouch volume. This technique may ultimately be clinically useful in treating weight regain after gastric bypass surgery.     

Pilot study evaluating technical feasibility and early outcomes of second-generation endosurgical platform for treatment of weight regain after gastric bypass surgery

BackgroundFor some gastric bypass patients, dilation of the gastrojejunal anastomosis (GJA) and/or gastric pouch is believed to contribute to weight regain. The present study had 2 objectives: (1) to assess the technical feasibility and safety of a novel endoscopic procedure called “revision obesity surgery endoscopic” (ROSE) using a second-generation, prototype endoscopic operating system that creates tissue plications to reduce the diameter of the GJA and the size of the gastric pouch; and (2) to assess the early outcomes regarding weight loss at a university hospital in the United States.MethodsThis was a prospective study of 5 patients who had regained a mean of 14.7 kg after gastric bypass with a dilated pouch and GJA on screening endoscopy. The gastric pouch and the GJA were measured before and after the procedure. The patients were followed up for a minimum of 3 months after the procedure. Weight changes were recorded.ResultsTechnical success was achieved in all 5 patients (100%). The mean weight loss in the successful cases was 7.8 kg at 3 months. No major complications developed.ConclusionThe results of our study have shown that the ROSE procedure using this second-generation prototype endoscopic operating system is technically feasible and appears safe. Our preliminary results suggest that the ROSE procedure is effective in reducing the size of both the GJA and the gastric pouch and could therefore be an alternative therapy for weight regain in postgastric bypass patients.     

Salvage banding for failed Roux-en-Y gastric bypass

BackgroundAfter Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), a substantial number of patients do not achieve successful long-term weight loss. In cases of loss of restriction, the application of an adjustable gastric band (“salvage banding”) over the gastric pouch, or gastrojejunostomy, could prevent weight regain or increase weight loss. The objective of this literature review is to provide an overview of the studies that report the effect of salvage banding after failed RYGB.MethodsA systemic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Google Scholar, Medline, the Cochrane Library, and the online websites of specific bariatric surgery journals to identify all relevant studies describing salvage banding after failed RYGB.ResultsSeven studies, with a total of 94 patients, were included for a systemic literature review. Inclusion criteria for salvage banding varied from unsuccessful weight loss to technical pouch failure. After salvage banding, all studies reported further weight loss, varying from 55.9%–94.2% excess body mass index loss (EBMIL) after 12–42 months of follow-up. In the included study group, 18% (17/94) of the patients developed long-term complications requiring a re-revision in 17% (16/94) of the cases.ConclusionThe results of all 9 studies that were included in this review report a further increase in weight loss after salvage banding for failed RYGB. In case of insufficient weight loss or technical pouch failure after RYGB, all reports suggest that salvage banding is a safe and feasible revisional procedure. Prospective studies are necessary to determine to the success of direct application of an adjustable gastric band in primary RYGB.     

Treatment of Weight Regain Following Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: Revision of Pouch,Creation of New Gastrojejunostomy and Placement of Proximal Pericardial Patch Ring

In the literature, weight regain or failure of weight loss has been reported in up to 35 % of patients after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). Several revisional procedures have been suggested to reinitiate further weight loss in this group of patients, and placing a silastic ring around the pouch proximal to the gastrojejunostomy is one among those procedures. The aim of our study is to evaluate and compare the safety and efficacy of salvage banding using a pericardial patch after RYGB for further weight loss. Between December 2009 and April 2013, a total of 46 patients underwent revision with pericardial patch ring after RYGB for weight regain/failure of weight loss. A retrospective review of a prospectively collected database was performed, noting the outcomes and complications of the procedure. The mean body mass index at the time of revision was 40.1?±?6.8 kg/m². Mean percentage of excess weight loss was 23.4?±?15.7 %, 39.0?±?27.4 %, and 18.9?±?20.5 % at 6, 12 and 24 months after revision, respectively. Eight (17.4 %) patients required a total of 11 readmissions due to nausea, vomiting, dysphagia and abdominal pain. Six (13.0 %) patients underwent a total of six reoperations, including four patients with laparoscopic removal of the pericardial patch and another revision of RYGB, and two patients with repair of perforated ulcers. Revision with pericardial patch ring after gastric bypass for weight regain or failure of weight loss may not be feasible, safe and effective.     

A systematic review of the effect of gastric pouch and/or gastrojejunostomy (stoma) size on weight loss outcomes with Roux-en-Y gastric bypass

Surgical Endoscopy - The effect of the gastric pouch or Gastrojejunostomy (GJ or stoma) size on weight loss outcomes after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is unclear with studies reporting...     

Peroral endoscopic reduction of dilated gastrojejunal anastomosis after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a possible new option for patients with weight regain

Background Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is an effective treatment for severe obesity. However, many patients regain weight over time. The mechanisms for this are unclear, and several factors may contribute, including dilation of the gastrojejunal anastomosis. This study aimed to assess the feasibility of endoscopic gastrojejunal anastomotic tightening and to determine the effect of tightening on body weight. Methods Eight patients with significant weight regain and dilated gastrojejunal anastomosis after RYGB were included in this pilot study. Sutures were placed endoscopically at the rim of the anastomosis. When tightened, the sutures formed tissue placations, reducing the size of the anastomotic aperture. Results The average preprocedure body mass index (BMI) was 40.5, and the patients had regained a mean of 24 kg from their post-RYGB nadir. The average pouch length was 5.7 cm, and the average anastomotic diameter was 25 mm. The average postreduction diameter was 10.0 mm (68% reduction). Six of the eight patients showed weight loss (mean, 10 kg) at 4 months. Repeat procedures were performed for three patients who had lost 4, 5, and 9 kg, respectively with the initial procedure. After the second anastomotic reduction, the final diameters were, respectively, 14, 5, and 5 mm. The first patient did not have further weight loss. The remaining two patients showed a total weight loss of 19 and 20 kg, respectively, at 5 months. All 11 reductions were accomplished without significant complication. The average postreduction BMI was 37.7, and the percentage of excess weight loss was 23.4%. Conclusion Peroral endoscopic suturing to tighten dilated gastrojejunal anastomoses appears technically feasible and safe. This procedure is associated with variable but significant weight loss, and preliminary results suggest that it may offer a new treatment option for postbypass weight regain in selected patients.     

Endoscopic intraluminal suture plication of the gastric pouch and stoma in postoperative Roux-en-Y gastric bypass patients

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic intraluminal suturing is currently used to treat gastroesophageal reflux disease. This new field of intraluminal gastric surgery may benefit postoperative Roux-en-Y gastric bypass patients. While gastric bypass is highly successful in the majority of patients, significant weight regain can occur over time due to stretching of the gastric pouch and stoma. METHODS: Between November 2002 and January 2003, four patients who previously underwent gastric bypass (GBP) surgery presented with dilated gastrojejunostomy (GJ) anastomosis and weight regain. They gave their consent and were taken to the operating room for upper endoscopy, where they were placed under general anesthesia. Using a flexible endoscopic suturing device with a standard 11-mm endoscope, the dilated GJ anastomosis was plicated to reduce its size, and in two of the patients the gastric pouch was also plicated. RESULTS: Successful stomal plication was performed on all four patients to narrow their dilated stomas that measured > 2 cm preoperatively to < 15 mm postoperatively. Patients were told to go on a puree diet for 4 weeks. One patient had a repeat procedure due to rupture of one suture after eating solid food two weeks after the surgery. The stoma was then plicated with 3 sutures. Two patients had their gastric pouch plicated near the stoma. All patients to date report feeling full earlier with decrease caloric consumption and subsequent weight loss. CONCLUSION: Upper endoscopic intraluminal suturing represents a new field of emerging technology that will certainly find its role in the postoperative bariatric patient. Both the gastric pouch and stoma are within reach for endoscopic intraluminal therapy. How it can aid our patients is currently being studied.     

Natural orifice surgery: endoluminal pouch reduction following failed vertical banded gastroplasty

Background  

Following vertical banded gastroplasty (VBG), patients may develop pouch complications such as dilation and staple-line dehiscence. This may contribute to weight regain, and if conservative measures are exhausted, traditionally, open revisional surgery of the pouch or conversion of the VBG to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) would be considered. StomaphyX^TM is an endoscopic device used with a conventional gastroscope for the approximation of tissue in gastric pouches or across gastroenteric anastomoses to enhance restriction. The objective of this study is to analyze the outcomes of StomaphyX^TM endoluminal pouch revision following failed VBG.     

Influence of post–Roux-en-Y gastric bypass weight recidivism on insulin resistance: a 3-year follow-up

BackgroundAlthough some early metabolic benefits provided by bariatric surgery are known to occur regardless of weight loss, the impact of mid- to long-term weight recidivism after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) on metabolic outcomes is not profoundly understood.ObjectiveTo investigate the effect of weight recidivism on insulin resistance among nondiabetic individuals with morbid obesity after RYGB during a 3-year follow-up.SettingPublic tertiary university hospital.MethodsThis is a cohort study based on a prospectively collected database of a public tertiary university hospital, which enrolled individuals with morbid obesity who underwent RYGB and were followed-up for 3 years. Weight loss was classified into the following 3 categories: (1) no weight regain; (2) expected regain (regain ≤20% of the maximum weight loss); and (3) obesity recidivism (regain >20% of the maximum weight loss). Homeostasis model assessment (HOMA) values were compared over time.ResultsOf 100 patients, 20% presented obesity recidivism and 52% an expected regain after 3 years of surgery; 28% showed no regain. The recidivism group presented a significant increase in HOMA 3 years after surgery (P = .02). The recidivism group presented a significantly higher HOMA 3 years after surgery than the observed in the other groups (P < .001), as well as a significantly higher percentage of HOMA variation throughout the follow-up (P = .02).ConclusionWeight recidivism after RYGB was significantly associated with a worsening of insulin resistance among nondiabetic individuals with morbid obesity. Thus, weight loss seems to play a significant role in the maintenance of the early metabolic improvement achieved after RYGB.     

Successful management of gastrojejunal strictures after gastric bypass: is timing important?

BackgroundEndoscopic balloon dilation is an effective treatment of gastrojejunal (GJ) strictures after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), although its success might depend on the point at which they occur postoperatively. We hypothesized that “late” strictures (≥90 d after RYGB) might be less amenable to balloon dilations than “early” strictures occurring within 90 days postoperatively.MethodsA review of a prospectively maintained database at a bariatric center was conducted to identify all patients who underwent upper endoscopy (UE) for investigation of gastrointestinal symptoms after RYGB. Those who were diagnosed with a GJ anastomotic stricture at endoscopy were selected for additional evaluation. The patients were classified into 1 of 3 groups, according to the point at which they presented with stricture symptoms (group 1, 0–90 d after RYGB; group 2, 91–365 d after RYGB; and group 3, >1 yr after RYGB). All strictures were dilated using through-the-scope controlled radial expansion balloons.ResultsFrom July 2006 to July 2009, 929 RYGB procedures were performed in our bariatric unit. Our surgical endoscopy team performs approximately 1500 UE investigations annually. Most investigations were for preoperative assessment of bariatric patients; however, a proportion is indicated for the investigation of postoperative weight regain and complications of foregut surgery, as well as endoluminal surgery. In the present study period, 591 gastric bypass patients underwent UE for investigation of gastrointestinal symptoms postoperatively. In total, 72 patients were diagnosed with a symptomatic GJ anastomotic stricture and underwent balloon dilation. Almost two thirds (63.9%) of the dilations were performed within 90 days after RYGB; 98% of these “early” strictures resolved with dilation. In comparison, of the “late” strictures, only 61% (16 of 26 patients) resolved and 38.5% (n = 10) required revisional surgery for additional management.ConclusionEndoscopic balloon dilation is effective in treating early GJ strictures after RYGB. Late strictures are less amenable to endoscopic dilation and often require revisional surgery. Patients presenting with upper gastrointestinal symptoms after RYGB warrant early investigation with UE to investigate for a GJ stricture, which if present, should be promptly dilated.     

Endoscopic findings and outcomes of revisional procedures for patients with weight recidivism after gastric bypass

Background  

Significant weight regain occurs for 10% to 20% of patients after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). Potential causative factors include anatomic abnormalities such as enlargement of the gastric pouch and gastrojejunostomy (GJ). This report describes endoscopic findings for patients referred for investigation of weight regain and presents the outcomes of revisional therapy for patients with abnormal anatomy.     

The procedure of mesh wrapping the gastric pouch in cadaver study

Dietary and behavioral modifications have resulted in limited long-term success in curing morbidly obese patients, and surgery remains the only effective treatment. Of the surgical procedures that are the most commonly offered, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) appears to offer the best long-term results. However 5–15% of patients will not achieve successful weight loss after RYGB. There are many reports showing that the patients who underwent gastric bypass surgeries regain weight over time. The cause for this remains unclear. Several factors may contribute, including dilation of the gastric pouch and the gastrojejunal anastomosis. However, the data to support the link is sparse. The objective of this paper is to describe the surgical technique of wrapping the gastric pouch with a polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) mesh to prevent gastric pouch dilatation. In specific, we created a 20–30 ml gastric pouch and subsequently, the gastrojejunostomy was performed with a circular stapler. Afterwards, the mesentery was dissected and the gastric pouch was wrapped with the PTFE mesh. We have performed this procedure on three cadavers with an average operative time of 75 minutes. We found that the procedure of wrapping the gastric pouch was not particularly difficult. As a result, the gastric pouch, gastrojejunal anastomosis and the stump of the jejunum are all totally wrapped within the mesh. It may be effective in the prevention of dilatation.     

Pouch volume and pouch migration after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a comparison of gastroscopy and 3 D-CT volumetry: is there a “migration crisis”?

BackgroundRoux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is the second most frequently performed bariatric procedure worldwide. While pouch migration is a common phenomenon after sleeve gastrectomy, it has hardly been documented after RYGB so far.ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to correlate the diagnostic performance of gastroscopy of the gastroesophageal junction with 3-dimensional computed tomography (CT) during postoperative care of patients revised due to weight regain after RYGB, with particular attention to intrathoracic pouch migration (ITM) and pouch volume.SettingUniversity Hospital Setting, Austria.MethodsThirty RYGB patients that were revised owing to weight regain (median age 37.5 yr) before December 2017 were included in this prospective study. CT findings were correlated with gastroscopy regarding pouch size and ITM. Pouch distention was achieved with both oral contrast and effervescent granules. All patients had CT and gastroscopy on the same day. In addition, patients were evaluated for reflux disease based on clinical history.ResultsITM was found in 20 of 30 (66.7%) patients in CT, whereas gastroscopy did not correctly identify any herniation. In 16 of 28 (57.1%) patients pouch measurements at gastroscopy and CT showed a difference <40%. In 2 patients, pouch distention was not sufficient for CT volumetry. The intraclass correlation coefficient proved to be .594. Symptomatic reflux was present in 10 of 30 (33.3%) patients, 5 of whom had ITM.ConclusionITM is an underreported finding after revised RYGB and missed in gastroscopy. In terms of pouch volume, 3-dimensional–CT volumetry demonstrated only moderate agreement with gastroscopy.     

Using the StomaphyX(TM) endoplicator to treat a gastric bypass complication

Background and Objectives:

As the number of bariatric operations performed increases, the number of patients requiring reoperation for failed weight loss is expected to proportionately increase. Natural orifice surgery is an alternative approach to revisional gastric bypass surgery when postoperative complications, such as dilatation of the gastrojejunostomy, gastrogastric fistula, and gastric pouch, dilation occur.

Methods:

The present article reports on the safe and successful use of an endoscopic tissue plicating device in a patient found to have a dilated gastric pouch and a gastrogastric fistula 12 years after an open, nondivided RYGB.

Results:

The procedure was performed without complications and resulted in a reduced pouch size to approximately 30cc to 50cc and redirection of the flow of gastric contents through her gastrojejunostomy. The patient''s early satiety returned and, 1 year postoperatively, she had incurred a 45-pound weight loss.

Discussion:

The morbidity and mortality of revision gastric bypass was avoided while the patient''s goal of moderate weight loss was achieved. Tissue plicating devices offer an alternative for repair of some postbariatric complications. With the rapid advances in endoluminal technology and increasing experience with natural orifice surgery, the ability to successfully address surgical problems through less invasive means will continue to improve.     

Surgical therapy of weight regain after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass

BackgroundRoux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is a well-established surgical method for morbid obesity; however, weight regain (WR) after initially good results may be considered an issue, the treatment of which has found no consensus yet.ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to compare the different surgical methods treating WR after RYGB that are used at the Vienna Medical University in a larger number of patients, concerning further weight loss, complications, and reoperations.SettingUniversity hospital, Austria.MethodsThis study includes all patients with RYGB who were reoperated due to WR at the Vienna Medical University by December 2016 (n = 84). The follow-up rate was 93%. The following 4 approaches to treating WR after RYGB were taken: (1) pouch resizing, (2) pouch banding, (3) pouch resizing plus pouch banding, and (4) common limb shortening (i.e., distalization).ResultsThe mean maximum excess weight loss referring to the WR procedure in the 4 groups was as follows: group 1: 69.0% ± 35.2%, group 2: 62.8% ± 39.5%, group 3: 83.1% ± 30.9%, and group 4: 81.5% ± 41.6%. Reoperations occurred in the following different groups: group 1 had 2 balloon dilations (20%), groups 2 (n = 13) and 3 (n = 29) had 5 (38% and 17%) band removals each, and group 4 had 9 reversal procedures due to malnutrition (30%).ConclusionsThere are nonsignificant differences in terms of additional weight loss between the different methods. However, differences lay in the areas of adverse symptoms and further reoperations. While there was no risk of malnutrition with pouch resizing, there was with distalization. Pouch banding (with or without resizing) poses a higher risk of dysphagia.     

Ten-year outcome of one-anastomosis gastric bypass with a biliopancreatic limb of 150 cm versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a single-institution series of 940 patients

BackgroundLong-term outcomes of one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) need to be compared with those of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB).ObjectiveThe present study evaluates the long-term outcomes at 10-year follow-up of OAGB with a biliopancreatic limb of 150 cm versus RYGB.SettingPrivate practice, France.MethodsData of patients who underwent OAGB or RYGB as primary or secondary procedures between 2010 and 2011 at a referral center were collected prospectively and analyzed retrospectively.ResultsA total of 940 patients underwent OAGB (n = 405) or RYGB (n = 535). Operative time was significantly shorter in the OAGB group. Postoperative morbidity occurred in 17.2% of patients after RYGB versus 8.1% after OAGB (P ≤ .0001). Patients in the RYGB group had a significantly higher rate of kinking of the jejuno-jejunal anastomosis, stenosis of the gastrojejunal anastomosis, and dysphagia for early ulcers. At long term, no differences were found in the rate of severe malnutrition. Cumulated morbidity was significantly higher after RYGB, with higher incidence of internal hernia, anastomotic ulcer, blind-loop syndrome, and hypoglycemia. Conversion to RYGB and laparoscopic exploration for chronic pain were more frequent after OAGB. Surgery for weight regain was significantly more frequent after RYGB. Patients in the OAGB group had significantly lower weight, body mass index, and greater percentage excess, and total weight losses at 120 months. No significant differences were detected in co-morbidity outcomes.ConclusionAfter 10 years, both RYGB and OAGB are effective procedures. However, OAGB is associated with shorter operative times and better results in short- and long-term morbidity and weight loss outcomes.     

Gastric pouch resizing for Roux-en-Y gastric bypass failure in patients with a dilated pouch

BackgroundInsufficient weight loss or weight regain a few years after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is becoming a serious problem given the large diffusion of this procedure. In the present study, we analyzed the feasibility and safety of pouch resizing for Roux-en-Y gastric bypass failure in a consecutive series of 20 patients at a university hospital.MethodsA prospectively maintained database was queried regarding patient demographics, the indication for revision morbidity, the percentage of excess weight loss, and the evolution of co-morbidities.ResultsA total of 20 patients, 18 women and 2 men, with a mean age of 44 years and mean body mass index of 45.8 kg/m², underwent pouch resizing. No patients died; 6 patients (30%) developed complications, including acute abdomen due to volvulus of the small bowel in 1, intra-abdominal abscess in 3, and pulmonary embolus in 2. At a mean follow-up of 20 months, the percentage of excess weight loss was an average of 69.1% and persistent co-morbidities had improved or resolved.ConclusionPouch resizing has been shown to be a valuable option in the short term for weight loss failure or regain in patients who have undergone laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and have a dilated gastric pouch. However, the long-term efficacy of this procedure needs to be determined.     

Revisional bariatric surgery is more effective for improving obesity-related co-morbidities than it is for reinducing major weight loss

BackgroundPatients having previous bariatric surgery are at risk for weight regain and return of co-morbidities. If an anatomic basis for the failure is identified, many surgeons advocate revision or conversion to a Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. The aim of this study was to determine whether revisional bariatric surgery leads to sufficient weight loss and co-morbidity remission.Patients and MethodsFrom 2005-2012, patients undergoing revision were entered into a prospectively maintained database. Perioperative outcomes, including complications, weight loss, and co-morbidity remission, were examined for all patients with a history of a previous vertical banded gastroplasty (VBG) or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB).ResultsTwenty-two patients with a history of RYGB and 56 with a history of VBG were identified. Following the revisional procedure, the RYGB group experienced 35.8% excess weight loss (%EWL) and a 31.8% morbidity rate. For the VBG group, patients experienced a 46.2% %EWL from their weight before the revisional operation with a 51.8% morbidity rate. Co-morbidity remission rate was excellent. Diabetes (VBG:100%, RYGB: 85.7%), gastroesophageal reflux disease (VBG: 94.4%, RYGB: 80%), and hypertension (VBG: 74.2%, RYGB:60%) demonstrated significant improvement.ConclusionRevision of a failed RYGB or conversion of a VBG to a RYGB provides less weight loss and a higher complication rate than primary RYGB but provides an excellent opportunity for co-morbidity remission.