Strategies for improving quality of life in older patients with metastatic breast cancer

Given both the increase in the mean age of the population of Western countries and the high incidence of breast cancer beyond the age of 65 years, it is evident that breast cancer in older women will be a very common problem for the medical oncologist. Metastatic breast cancer is still not amenable to a cure; therefore quality of life during therapy is an important issue, which until recently has been poorly investigated. Similarly, despite recent advances in breast cancer therapy, physicians have been reluctant to enrol older patients in clinical trials, and there is a lack of data regarding this population. This review focuses on quality-of-life issues during metastatic breast cancer treatment in geriatric patients, comparing the standard therapeutic options and newer approaches. Although first-line endocrine therapy with tamoxifen remains a standard treatment, the newer third-generation aromatase inhibitors provide similar or better efficacy with fewer adverse effects and a better quality of life. It has been a common belief that chemotherapy impairs quality of life, but recent studies in advanced breast cancer have shown that this therapy has a positive effect on quality of life, at least in responders. Consequently, chemotherapy should not be denied to elderly patients with metastatic breast cancer, provided a prior geriatric assessment is performed to evaluate the risk-benefit ratio. New chemotherapy strategies, such as the taxanes and orally administered chemotherapy, represent a very attractive alternative for a better quality of life in elderly patients with metastatic breast cancer.     

Drug design strategies for the treatment of prostate cancer

Introduction: While metastatic prostate cancer remains an incurable tumor, remarkable progress has been made with novel drug design strategies for this incurable disease. Several new agents, including hormonal analogues, cytotoxic chemotherapy drugs, radionuclides and innovative targeted therapies, have recently been approved by the FDA for use in advanced and/or metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer. Furthermore, a growing number of new diagnostic or predictive genetic tests have also been incorporated into the management of this disease. Immunotherapy-based approaches have shown promise and have led to drug approvals. Other experimental approaches such as vascular targeting are in early translational clinical trials.

Areas covered: Herein, the authors outline select state-of-the-art approaches in the field. They also discuss the current challenges and future opportunities in the medical care of prostate cancer patients.

Expert opinion: An inherent challenge in the treatment of prostate cancer is to determine which patients need immediate aggressive treatment versus active surveillance. For patients needing aggressive treatment, integrating the sequence of therapeutic interventions, to provide the most benefit, remains a challenge that clinicians face. Recently, several genetic tests have been approved, facilitating early treatment decisions. Innovative targeted therapies are moving towards clinical applications, providing treatment options for tumors previously considered refractory to androgen ablation treatment.     

High-dose chemotherapy in breast cancer

High-dose chemotherapy is based on the scientific hypothesis that escalating the dose of drug will overcome drug resistance and improve outcome. Autologous bone marrow transplantation and, more recently, peripheral stem cell transplantation used as a means to restore marrow, made this a viable treatment for patients with selected tumours such as haematological malignancies. The role in breast cancer is less certain. Given the known as well as the potential toxicities, the objective of high-dose chemotherapy should be cure as opposed to palliation. However, the natural history of breast cancer can be protracted, with relapses occurring 15-20 years after treatment or within months of curative surgery. In breast cancer there is a positive correlation between recurrence-free and long-term survival. Therefore, the recurrence-free survival can be considered a surrogate endpoint in clinical trials. In patients with metastatic disease where cure is rare, at best, duration of a disease-free state may be a surrogate for overall benefit. Alternatively, time to progression may be another endpoint in the evaluation of treatment for metastatic disease. This is based on the assumption that quality of life is enhanced without progression of disease. Toxicity is the significant issue in the use of high-dose chemotherapy. The most common toxicity is myeloablation, potentially requiring prolonged hospitalisation. The only justification for these toxicities would be evidence of significant and meaningful benefit. A clinically relevant benefit with high-dose chemotherapy has not been seen in major randomised clinical trials of breast cancer in both the adjuvant and metastatic setting. In patients with advanced breast cancer, a small percentage may achieve long-term, disease-free survival, although there is no improvement in overall survival. Nonetheless, some investigators believe that high-dose chemotherapy holds promise, although currently this treatment is not recommended outside of a well designed prospective trial. These studies have provided useful information regarding cancer treatment. However, ongoing study of drug administration intervals, that is, dose-dense therapies, may lead to an approach that allows superior and less toxic treatment for breast cancer.     

The role of antiangiogenetic agents in the treatment of breast cancer

Angiogenesis is known to be essential for the development and progression of cancer. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is a critical mediator in tumor angiogenesis for many solid malignancies, including breast cancer. Increased levels of VEGF have been associated with poor clinical outcomes, including reduced survival. VEGF has become an attractive target for cancer therapy in view of its pivotal role in angiogenesis. The primary approaches for inhibiting angiogenesis have focused on inhibiting the activity of VEGF, either by targeting the VEGF ligand itself with monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) or by interfering with the signaling events downstream of VEGF through the use of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Bevacizumab is a recombinant, humanized monoclonal IgG1, anti-VEGF antibody that has demonstrated significant clinical benefit in several solid tumors. Bevacizumab has been approved for use in combination with paclitaxel for the first line treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) based on the results of the randomized phase III E2100 trial in which it improves response rate and time to progress when administered with weekly paclitaxel until disease progression. Several trials to define the role of bevacizumab in different setting of disease and in combination with different chemotherapy regimens and targeted therapy in breast cancer patients are ongoing. Other small molecule inhibitors of VEGF tyrosine kinase activity (TKIs) such as sunitinib, vandetanib and sorafenib are being tested in MBC. This review will focus on bevacizumab and on the developements of the main antiangiogenic agents in the treatment of breast cancer.     

Lapatinib: the evidence for its therapeutic value in metastatic breast cancer

INTRODUCTION: Breast cancer is the most common cancer affecting women. Many patients ultimately progress to metastatic disease and optimal management of this disease remains a significant therapeutic challenge. Lapatinib, a dual tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is in clinical development for treatment of this disease. AIMS: The objective of this article is to review the published evidence for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer with lapatinib, and assess its therapeutic potential. EVIDENCE REVIEW: Most evidence has appeared in meeting abstract reports of phase I and II studies in healthy volunteers and cancer patients. Four studies have included patients with exclusively breast cancer. Complete and partial responses and stable disease has been reported in some patients. Emerging evidence indicates that complete and partial responses can be achieved in some patients with metastatic breast cancer. Lapatinib appears to be well tolerated in cancer patients and the maximum tolerated dose is in the region of 1800 mg/day. In addition, it has been used in combination with other cancer treatments. Five ongoing or planned phase II monotherapy and three phase III combination-therapy studies with lapatinib have been identified. OUTCOMES SUMMARY: The phase I and II studies reported to date have provided safety data and preliminary indications regarding efficacy. There is preliminary evidence that lapatinib can achieve objective response rates of 10-38% in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Patients with tumors overexpressing ErbB1 and/or ErbB2 are likely to benefit from lapatinib treatment.     

G-coupled protein receptors and breast cancer progression: potential drug targets

Breast cancer remains a leading cause of death despite early screening and advances in medicine. Bone marrow metastasis often complicates the clinical picture by requiring more aggressive treatment and worsening long-term prognoses. Recent therapeutic targeting of hormonal receptors such as human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 and estrogen receptor has shown limited success in treating localized disease for those patients whose cancer cells are responsive. Although traditional approaches such as chemotherapy have demonstrated many successes, these agents fail to target quiescent cancer stem cells, which might have entered the bone marrow where they might be responsible for the quiescence population. Following years of clinical remission, these dormant cells could lead to secondary cancer resurgence. To date, little progress has been made in the development of targeted treatments for receptor negative and metastatic disease. In this review, we discuss the role of G-protein coupled receptors, including neurokinin-1, neurokinin-2 and chemokine receptor 4, as novel targets in the treatment of breast cancer.     

转移性结直肠癌二线治疗的研究进展

结直肠癌在全球范围内都是威胁人们健康的重大疾病。内科治疗是进展期结直肠癌的最主要、也是最有效的治疗措施。近年来,转移性结直肠癌的内科治疗效果得到了很大提高。化疗及分子靶向药物治疗能显著改善转移性结直肠癌患者的二线治疗的预后,延长生存时间、提高生活质量。     

乳腺癌肝转移介入治疗疗效分析

目的探讨介入治疗对乳腺癌肝转移的治疗效果,并对其在乳腺癌肝转移综合治疗中的价值进行评价。方法对我院2006年1月-2010年12月就诊的46例乳腺癌肝转移患者设为观察组进行介入治疗,药物选择为顺铂、丝裂霉素、阿霉素、5-氟尿嘧啶等,其中38例进行超液化碘油栓塞,与31例采用化学治疗的患者（对照组）进行对比分析。结果本组46例乳腺癌肝转移患者经介入治疗后,完全缓解9例,部分缓解19例,进展7例,无变化11例。结论乳腺癌肝转移的介入治疗疗效显著,毒副作用小,应作为乳腺癌肝转移综合治疗中的主要治疗手段。     

The group of Professor Wanliang Lu has made progress in targeted gene editing systems against metastatic breast cancer

The group of Professor Wanliang Lu has made progress in targeted gene editing systems against metastatic breast cancer.     

Weekly administration of bendamustine as salvage therapy in metastatic breast cancer: final results of a phase II study

Single-agent bendamustine has shown promise in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer. As toxicity was low after weekly administration of this drug in other solid tumors, the present double-center phase II trial was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of weekly bendamustine as salvage treatment in metastatic breast cancer. A total of 34 patients with anthracycline (88%) and/or taxane (71%) pretreated for metastatic breast cancer received 60 mg/m bendamustine on day 1, 8 and 15 every 28 days for six cycles. In addition, 10 patients with HER2/neu-overexpressing tumors either continued (five patients) or started treatment with 2 mg/kg trastuzumab weekly (loading dose 4 mg/kg) at study entry. Patients had predominantly visceral disease and had received one (88%) or two chemotherapy regimens for metastatic breast cancer. All patients were eligible for toxicity and 27 for response evaluation. No grade 3 or 4 hematologic toxicity occurred. Only three patients experienced grade 3 nonhematologic toxicity. Five patients (19%) reached a partial response. Stable disease for at least 6 months was achieved in eight patients, for a clinical benefit rate of 48%. The median progression-free survival and median overall survival were 6 months (range, 1-16) and 15 months (range, 2-28), respectively. We conclude that weekly bendamustine is a valid treatment option in patients with anthracycline-pretreated and/or taxanepretreated metastatic breast cancer; in particular, due to its low toxicity profile. Future trials should evaluate higher single doses of bendamustine in a weekly schedule.     

Targeted therapies in breast cancer: established drugs and recent developments

In the past few years many encouraging advancements have been made in understanding the molecular mechanisms underlying carcinogenesis and tumor progression. These improvements have led to the identification of promising new targets for cancer therapy. There has been much success with the HER2 targeting antibody trastuzumab (Herceptin) in the treatment of early stage and metastatic breast cancer. Consequently, several antibodies inhibiting cellular signaling of VEGF and EGFR were tested with respect to their efficacy in breast cancer. In phase II and III clinical trials the humanized anti-VEGF antibody bevacizumab (Avastin) alone or in combination with capecitabine exhibited responses in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Recent developments focus on small molecules interfering with different signal transduction pathways in tumor cells. Numerous inhibitors of EGF and VEGF receptor tyrosine kinases and farnesyl transferases are in early stages of clinical development for breast cancer. Another promising approach is the targeting of endothelins and their two G-protein coupled receptors (ET(A)R und ET(B)R). In this article, we will shortly outline well established targeted treatments and discuss the current development of novel agents to be utilized for molecular targeted breast cancer therapy. Due to the heterogeneity of disease and varying response to conventional systemic therapies, these new perceptions may lead to substantial patient benefit and provide a promising basis for future clinical application.     

First-line treatment strategies for elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer ranks third in incidence in both men and women after lung, breast and prostate cancer. The prevalence of colorectal cancer increases significantly with age, with 40% of patients in Europe being >75 years of age at the time of initial diagnosis. Furthermore, the number of elderly patients with colorectal cancer is expected to increase significantly over the next two decades. Treatment of advanced colorectal cancer has evolved dramatically over the last decade. Advances in surgery and chemotherapy are effective in prolonging time to disease progression and survival in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. For >40 years, fluorouracil has been the mainstay of chemotherapy for advanced colorectal cancer. Recently, however, newer cytotoxic chemotherapies and biological agents effective against colorectal cancer have been shown to improve overall survival in metastatic disease. Thus, a patient with metastatic colorectal cancer today has an expected median survival of 20 months compared with 10 months only a few years ago. There is evidence that elderly individuals derive as much survival benefit from standard chemotherapy approaches in metastatic colorectal cancer as younger patients. Unfortunately, most older patients who might benefit from chemotherapy are not offered this treatment, and the fraction who are not offered it increases with increasing age. Treatment decisions should not be made on the basis of age. Rather, they should be based on functional status, the presence of co-morbidities, and consideration of drug-specific toxicities that can be aggravated in older individuals because of decreased functional reserve. Although the elderly have been under-represented in clinical trials, studies also support the effectiveness of combination chemotherapy in elderly patients with advanced colorectal cancer. This article reviews current optimal first-line treatment strategies for elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.     

The US FDAs withdrawal of the breast cancer indication for Avastin (bevacizumab)

On November 18, 2011, the US Food and Drug Administration (US FDA) announced that breast cancer indication for Avastin (bevacizumab) had been withdrawn after concluding that the drug has not been shown to be safe and effective for the treatment of breast cancer. The specific indication that was withdrawn was for the use of bevacizumab in metastatic breast cancer, with paclitaxel for the treatment of patients who have not received chemotherapy for metastatic HER2-negative breast cancer.The US FDAs decision has been met with emotion and confusion among the public and health professionals. The purpose of this article is to review the regulatory history of bevacizumab for breast cancer and to examine the scientific evidence that led to the approval and subsequent withdrawal of this indication. Bevacizumab also provides the opportunity to illustrate the value of free publicly available US FDA reviews that may contain rigorously reviewed unpublished data and analyses and to contrast the decisions made in the US and Europe about bevacizumab and breast cancer.     

Paclitaxel-induced remission in docetaxel-refractory anthracycline-pretreated metastatic breast cancer

Paclitaxel and docetaxel are excellent agents with a high antitumor effect for the treatment of previously anthracycline-exposed metastatic breast cancer. There has been no standard treatment for patients who undergo therapy of a taxan-resistant metastatic breast cancer. Paclitaxel has partial non-cross-resistance in vitro with docetaxel in inhibiting microtubule disaggregation. We present the case of a patient with docetaxel-refractory anthracycline-pretreated metastatic breast cancer who achieved remission with paclitaxel.     

Clinical experiment of mutant herpes simplex virus HF10 therapy for cancer

We reviewed our clinical trial using mutant herpes simplex virus "HF10". We have evaluated the safety and effect of HF10 against recurrent breast cancer since 2003 and also applied HF10 to non-resectable pancreatic cancer since 2005. An oncolytic herpes simplex virus type 1, mutant HF10, has been isolated and evaluated for anti-tumor efficacy in syngeneic immunocompetent mouse models. From long time before clinical trial, we have found that the mutant virus can have remarkable potential to effectively treat cancer in experimental studies using animals, and that all of the surviving mice acquire resistance to rechallenge of the tumor cells. A number of studies have shown that HF10 is effective and safe for use in localized or peritoneally disseminated malignant tumors of non-neuronal origin in animals. Pilot studies using HF10 have been initiated in patients with metastatic breast cancer. For each patient, 0.5 ml HF10 diluents at various doses were injected into test nodule, and 0.5 ml sterile saline was injected into a second nodule. All patients were monitored for local and systemic adverse effects, and the nodules were excised 14 days after viral injection for histopathological studies. All patients tolerated the clinical trial well. While no adverse effects occurred, there was cancer cell death and 30-100% regression histopathologically in recurrent breast cancer. As mentioned above, intratumoral injection of mutant herpes simplex virus HF10 for recurrent metastatic breast cancer was safe and effective. Also a trial for non-resectable pancreatic cancer being carried out on the basis of the above result has proved to be innocuous and has been in progress to assess the clinical benefit and enhance the potentiality of HF10 against cancer.     

Strategies for the discovery and development of therapies for metastatic breast cancer

Nearly all deaths caused by solid cancers occur as a result of metastasis--the formation of secondary tumours in distant organs such as the lungs, liver, brain and bone. A major obstruction to the development of drugs with anti-metastatic efficacy is our fragmented understanding of how tumours 'evolve' and metastasize, at both the biological and genetic levels. Furthermore, although there is significant overlap in the metastatic process among different types of cancer, there are also marked differences in the propensity to metastasize, the extent of metastasis, the sites to which the tumour metastasizes, the kinetics of the process and the mechanisms involved. Here, we consider the case of breast cancer, which has some marked distinguishing features compared with other types of cancer. Considerable progress has been made in the development of preclinical models and in the identification of relevant signalling pathways and genetic regulators of metastatic breast cancer, and we discuss how these might facilitate the development of novel targeted anti-metastatic drugs.     

Palbociclib and beyond for the treatment of HR + HER2- metastatic breast cancer: an Asian-Pacific perspective and practical management guide on the use of CDK4/6 inhibitors

Abstract

Breast cancer is the most frequent cancer amongst women worldwide including in Asia where the incidence rate is rapidly increasing. Even with treatment, around 30% of patients with early breast cancer progress to metastatic disease, with hormone receptor positive (HR+) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (HER2-) breast cancer the most common phenotype. First-line endocrine therapy targeting the estrogen receptor signaling pathway provides a median progression-free survival or time to progression of 6–15?months in HR?+?HER2- metastatic breast cancer. Recently, cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors, combined with endocrine therapy, have achieved more than two years median progression-free survival in HR?+?HER2- metastatic breast cancer. However, the characteristics of the Asian breast cancer population differ from those of Western populations and need to be considered when selecting a suitable treatment. Breast cancer is diagnosed at a younger age in Asian populations and late stage at presentation is generally more common in low-/middle-income countries than high-income countries. Consequently, the proportion of premenopausal women with metastatic breast cancer is higher in Asian compared with Western populations. While CDK4/6 inhibitors have been approved in the USA (FDA) since 2015, experience with them in Asia is more limited. We review the experience with the CDK4/6 inhibitor palbociclib in Asian patients with HR?+?HER2- metastatic breast cancer and provide guidance on the use of palbociclib in these patients.     

Inhibition of receptor tyrosine kinases in combination with chemotherapy for the treatment of breast cancer

Although significant advances have been made in the treatment of breast cancer using chemotherapy, less than half of the patients treated for localized breast cancer benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy and most patients with metastatic cancer eventually develop disease that is chemotherapy resistant. Targeted agents, such as inhibitors of tyrosine kinases, offer the opportunity to reverse chemotherapy resistance and enhance response in patients with localized and advanced breast cancer. Such combined approaches have been established for the treatment of advanced breast cancer and are now demonstrating benefit in the adjuvant arena. This review summarizes the results of several trials involving the use of tyrosine kinase inhibition in combination with chemotherapy for the treatment of breast cancer and discusses future directions for breast cancer biotherapy.     

Cancer vaccine THERATOPE- Biomira

Biomira is developing a therapeutic cancer vaccine [THERATOPE] for treatment of breast and other cancers. This profile has been selected from R&D Insight, a pharmaceutical intelligence database produced by Adis International Ltd. THERATOPE consists of the mucin antigen, sialyl-Tn (STn), a carbohydrate located on the surface of breast, colorectal and ovarian cancer cells, conjugated to keyhole limpet haemocyanin (KLH). Merck KGaA has acquired a worldwide licence to THERATOPE for treatment of breast cancer. Under the terms of the licence, Biomira and Merck KGaA, via its US affiliate, EMD Pharmaceuticals, will jointly market the vaccine in the US. Merck KGaA holds exclusive marketing rights for the rest of the world, except in Canada (where Biomira retains rights), Israel and the Palestine Autonomy Area. Merck KGaA is now collaborating on phase III development for breast cancer. Biomira stands to receive $US150 million in licence, milestone payments and equity investments. The development costs will be shared between the two companies in North America but Merck KGaA will be solely responsible for these costs in countries outside the US. Previously, Chiron Corporation had purchased a licence to THERATOPE in 1997; however, Chiron terminated this agreement in June 2000. Under the terms of the termination, Biomira paid Chiron $US2.25 million to compensate the company for its investment in the development of THERATOPE. In addition, Biomira will make another payment of $US3.25 million to Chiron upon FDA approval of the vaccine. No further payments or royalties will be made. In the third quarter of 2002, an independent review of interim data from the trial was conducted. This was the fifth scheduled review of the data by the Independent Data Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB), all of which produced a positive response. Following the completion of the review, the DSMB stated that the trial should continue and that it had no safety concerns regarding this trial. Although the data, to which Biomira and Merck KgaA are blinded, did not meet the predetermined statistical significance for either endpoint at the time of the review, both companies have chosen to continue with the trial. Biomira has since announced that the p-value for the interim survival analysis was set at 0.01, while it is set at 0.03 for final survival analysis. The tighter criteria was set for the interim analysis to potentially give the companies the opportunity of applying for marketing approval earlier than expected. Final analysis of the trial will take place in mid-2003. If these analyses indicate therapeutic efficacy, Biomira will meet the FDA and Canadian regulatory officials to obtain marketing approval for the vaccine for breast cancer under the accelerated review guidelines. Assuming a best-case scenario, the vaccine could be filed for approval in 2004. The phase III trial was initiated following positive preliminary results achieved in a bridging study in patients with metastatic breast cancer in the US and UK. Biomira announced final results of the bridging study in May 1999. The results confirmed that antibody titres against the STn antigen were significantly higher in patients treated with the improved formulation of THERATOPE, compared with the corresponding titres of patients in the phase II trials of the old formulation of THERATOPE. In September 2002, the first patient was enrolled in a phase II THERATOPE trial, which is enrolling patients with metastatic breast cancer who are taking either an aromatase inhibitor or fulvestrant. Approximately 95 patients will be enrolled in the trial at up to 12 US sites. The study is primarily designed to evaluate THERATOPE's ability to induce an immune response in these patients. However, the safety and tolerability of the aromatase inhibitor plus THERATOPE, and the fulvestrant plus THERATOPE combinations will also be evaluated. The trial has not been designed to evaluate the efficacy of the two combinations. The US FDA has granted fast-track status tranted fast-track status to THERATOPE for development as an adjunct to first-line combination chemotherapy in responding patients with metastatic breast cancer. A phase II trial in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer has been completed in the US; positive preliminary results from this trial were released in May 2001. On 24 November 1999, Biomira announced that it had licensed two patents covering methods of preventing growth of cancer cells expressing a mucin-type glycoprotein. The patents have been issued in the US and are pending in Japan and Canada. When issued in Japan, the patents will provide additional protection for THERATOPE in that country. The patents were licensed from Dr Sen-itiroh Hakomori of the Biomembrane Institute in Seattle, with whom Biomira has also entered into a research collaboration. Biomira announced in April 2003 that following examination of its re-issue application by the US Patent and Trademark Office, its patent 5798090 was re-issued (RE 38046) with additional claims. These additional claims represent broader patent coverage. The additional coverage will last until 2015. Earlier, in February 2000, Biomira announced an expansion of equity line for up to $US100 million; a 3-fold rise that was done without any additional shares of Biomira stock being issued. In June 2002, Biomira stated that it believes the market size for THERATOPE in the US, Europe and Japan to be approximately 184000 patients for the indication of metastatic breast cancer, of which the US would be 100000, Europe 75000 and Japan 9000. For the indication of colorectal cancer, the total market population for THERATOPE is expected to be 183000 patients, of which the US has been estimated at 100000, Europe 75000 and Japan 9000.     

Investigational drugs in early stage clinical trials for the treatment of HER2+ breast cancer

Introduction: Despite improvements in the management of HER2+ breast cancer, metastatic disease is still fatal. Usually, these patients receive several lines of chemotherapy associated with HER2 targeted treatments. Most of the trials using innovative approaches are positioning themselves in disease that is resistant to pertuzumab and trastuzumab emtansine (TDM1).

Areas covered: We describe the recent advances in clinical development of anti-HER2 treatments. To this aim, we used literature search via Pubmed and made an inventory of abstracts published during the last two years in major oncology conferences.

Expert opinion: Further changes will probably occur during the next decade in the management of metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer. This is mainly driven by the fact that the two mainstay drugs (pertuzumab and TDM-1) that confer prolonged survival (56 months) to these patients are currently being used in the treatment of early-stage disease in a subset of patients. Thus, there is an urgent need to develop new, innovative approaches in those patients whose disease has become resistant to these highly potent drugs. Several new antibody-drug conjugates, bispecific antibodies or new generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKIs) hold promise and should be assessed and compared with drugs currently used.