Monotherapy with low-dose thalidomide for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: better response rate with earlier treatment

BACKGROUND: Thalidomide is an immunomodulatory drug used in the treatment of relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (MM). The optimal dosing regimen of thalidomide is not known. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analysed the overall response rate and response duration of 53 patients with relapsed MM who received thalidomide in a median dose of 100 mg daily. The aim of the study was to compare the response rates of thalidomide given as the second-line treatment to those of thalidomide given as the third-line therapy. RESULTS: Of 33 patients receiving thalidomide as second line, 13 (39%) had overall treatment response. Of 20 patients treated with thalidomide monotherapy as the third-line treatment, there were three treatment responses (15%) (P = 0.039). The median duration of treatment response in the second-line thalidomide group (12 months, range 6-60 months) was twice as long as that in the third-line thalidomide group (6 months, range 3-57 months), although the difference was not statistically significant, probably due to low number of patients. Only 6% of patients (3/53) had to stop the treatment because of toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: Monotherapy with low-dose thalidomide results in treatment responses in approximately 30% of patients with advanced MM. The response rate appears to be higher if thalidomide treatment is started after the first relapse or progression in comparison with the second relapse or progression. Treatment toxicity is acceptable even with prolonged exposure to the drug.     

Thalidomide, dexamethasone, Doxil and Velcade (ThaDD-V) followed by consolidation/maintenance therapy in patients with relapsed�Crefractory multiple myeloma

In newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM), three/four-drug combinations as induction therapy seem to be more effective compared with two-drug associations in terms of response rate and duration of remission. Moreover, there is an emergent body of evidences that consolidation/maintenance therapy improves the quality of response and remission duration. However, the impact of these strategies in relapsed/refractory MM (r-rMM) is still unknown. This phase II study explored the four-drug combination of thalidomide, dexamethasone, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (pLD), and bortezomib (ThaDD-V) as induction followed by consolidation therapy based on bortezomib-dexamethasone and thalidomide-dexamethasone and maintenance therapy with thalidomide in r-rMM patients. The primary end points of this study were best response and toxicity of the planned therapy. Forty-six patients were enrolled. At the end of therapy, the best response was as follows: 37% complete response (CR), 34.5% VGPR, and 4.5% PR with an ORR of 76%. Patients receiving ≤ 2 prior regimens had a CR rate significantly higher than those heavily treated (41% vs 0%; p=0.010). With a median follow-up of 31 months, median time to progression (TTP) and OS were 18.5 months and 40 months, respectively. By a 6-month landmark analysis, patients who completed the protocol had a significantly longer TTP compared with those who did not because of toxicity (not reached vs 7 months; p<0.0001). After the dose intensity of bortezomib was reduced due to an excess of peripheral neuropathy (PN), grade 3 PN occurred in 7.5% of patients. ThaDD-V followed by consolidation-maintenance therapy seems to be very effective in patients with r-rMM provided that this procedure is used early on relapse when very deep responses seem to be the rule.     

Low-dose thalidomide in combination with oral weekly cyclophosphamide and pulsed dexamethasone is a well tolerated and effective regimen in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma

The feasibility and efficacy of a triple regimen of oral weekly cyclophosphamide, monthly pulsed dexamethasone and low-dose Thalidomide (CDT) was studied in 52 patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (MM). All 52 patients were evaluable for response with a median follow up of 18 (4-29) months. About 17% achieved complete response (CR), 62% partial response (PR), 11% minimal response (MR), 6% stable disease (SD) and 4% progressive disease (PD), resulting in an objective response rate (>/=MR) of 90%. Subsequent to successful response, nine patients received high-dose therapy (HDT) followed by stem cell transplantation (SCT) and 34 received thalidomide monotherapy as maintenance. Response rate was not influenced by disease status, prior HDT or age. The regimen was successfully delivered to all patients except for one patient who developed abnormal liver function at 7 weeks. Infective complications were minimal and there were no infection-related deaths. The estimated overall and event-free survival (EFS) at 2 years was 73% and 34%, respectively, and the median time to progression has not been reached. We conclude that the CDT regimen is safe, well tolerated and effective in patients with relapsed and refractory myeloma.     

Salvage therapy with thalidomide in patients with advanced relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Few therapeutic options are presently available for patients with multiple myeloma (MM) who relapse after autologous or allogeneic stem cell transplantation, or for patients who are refractory to conventional chemotherapy and not eligible for salvage high-dose therapy. Thalidomide, a glutamic acid derivative with anti-angiogenic properties, has been recently proposed as an effective therapy for patients with advanced refractory disease. The aim of this study was to evaluate the activity of thalidomide in a large series of MM patients. DESIGN AND METHODS: From October 1999 to January 2001, 65 patients (46 males/19 females) from 8 Italian institutions were treated with thalidomide. Twenty-six patients had relapsed after autologous stem cell transplantation, either single (n = 12) or double (n= 12); 38 patients had shown disease progression after >= 2 lines of conventional chemotherapy, 2 patients had relapsed after allotransplant, one single patient had not received previous treatment. Sixty-one (93.8%) patients were in stage III, median b2 microglobulin was 2.9 mg/L, and median bone marrow plasma cell infiltration was 50%. Thalidomide was initially administered at a dose of 100 mg/day; if well tolerated, the dose was to be increased serially by 200mg every other week to a maximum of 800 mg/day. RESULTS: The median administered dose of thalidomide was 400 mg/day. WHO grade > II toxic effects were constipation (52%), lethargy (34%), skin rash (11%), peripheral neuropathy (14%) and leukopenia (3%). Sixty patients are presently evaluable for response; of these, 17 (28.3%) showed > or = 50% reduction in serum or urinary M protein concentration and 11 (18.3%) showed > or = 25% tumor reduction, for a total response rate averaging 46.6%. After a median of 8 months' follow-up, 15/28 patients are alive and progression-free (at 2 to 16 months), 12 patients have relapsed, and 1 patient died of pulmonary edema while still in partial remission. Among pre-treatment variables that were analyzed for their potential relationship with tumor response, only the concentration of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in the conditioned media obtained upon culture of bone marrow plasma cells was statistically significant. Plasma cells from patients who responded favorably to thalidomide secreted a significantly lower amount of VEGF than plasma cells from resistant patients (126.45 165 pg/mL vs 227.11 70 pg/mL, p=0.04). INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS: These data confirm that thalidomide is active in patients with advanced relapsed/refractory MM and represent the basis for ongoing clinical trials aimed at testing the role of this drug as front line therapy for newly diagnosed disease.     

CTD方案治疗难治或复发多发性骨髓瘤

目的应用环磷酰胺、沙立度胺及地塞米松(CTD)方案治疗难治或复发多发性骨髓瘤(MM)。方法20例难治或复发MM患者接受沙立度胺,100~200mg/d,口服持续应用;环磷酰胺,200~300mg.m-2.d-1,1~4d,静脉注射;地塞米松,20~40mg/d,1~4d,口服。4周为1个疗程。3个疗程后,若出现疗效或病情稳定则再连续应用3个疗程;若病情进展,则停止治疗。结果3个疗程后,13例(65%)患者显示治疗反应,其中9例患者获部分缓解,4例患者获微小缓解。而5例患者病情稳定,2例进展。对病情未进展的18例患者继续治疗3个疗程后再次评价,则部分缓解13例(65%),获微小缓解5例。结论CTD是一个具有较好治疗前景的方案。     

Thalidomide alone or in combination with dexamethasone in patients with advanced, relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma and renal failure

Salvage therapy of patients with advanced, relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (MM) is often limited by poor marrow reserve and multi-organ impairment. In particular, renal failure occurs in up to 50% of such patients, and this further limits the use of conventional chemotherapy. Thalidomide, both alone and in combination with dexamethasone, has been demonstrated to be useful in patients with advanced MM, as responses could be achieved in 30-60% of the cases. From May 2000 to November 2003, 20 consecutive MM patients (15 males, five females, median age 66.5 yr) with stage III relapsed/refractory MM and renal failure, defined as serum creatinine >130 mmol/L, gave their informed consent to be enrolled in a clinical trial aimed at evaluating the efficacy and the toxic effects of thalidomide. Three patients were undergoing chronic haemodialysis during the time of entry in the study. Eight patients have been treated with thalidomide as a single agent, at a starting dose of 100 mg/d, that was to be increased to 400 mg/d in case of good tolerance. Twelve patients have been treated with thalidomide at the maximum dose of 200 mg/d plus dexamethasone 40 mg/d for four consecutive days every 4 wk. A >50% decrease in serum or urine M component was observed in nine patients (45%), seven of whom have been treated with thalidomide + dexamethasone and three with thalidomide alone. Six additional patients achieved a minor response (>25% paraprotein decrease); the total response rate was thus 75%. Median response duration was 7 months (range 2-24 months). Four patients were refractory to treatment. Recovery of a normal renal function was observed in 12 of 15 responsive patients, two additional patients, in chronic haemodialysis, showed a reduction of serum creatinine. Toxicity profile of thalidomide with or without dexamethasone was comparable with that observed in patients with a normal renal function. In conclusion, our data show that thalidomide can be safely administered in patients with advanced MM and renal failure.     

Bortezomib plus dexamethasone is highly effective in relapsed and refractory myeloma patients but responses are short‐lived

Objectives: Bortezomib has proven to be effective as single agent in myeloma patients. Aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of bortezomib in combination with dexamethasone in a cohort of multiple myeloma (MM) relapsed/refractory patients treated in a single center. Patients and Methods: In this single center study, 70 patients were treated with bortezomib alone (9) or in combination with dexamethasone (61). Results: Forty‐one patients (59%) achieved at least a partial response (PR), including 7% complete response (CR), 36% very good partial response (VGPR) reaching the best response within four cycles. The duration of response was significantly longer for patients achieving CR/VGPR than for those achieving PR (7.3 vs. 3.8 months, P = 0.03). Likewise, time to progression, time to alternative treatment, and treatment free interval were significantly better for patients obtaining CR/VGPR (6.8, 9.4, 6.5 months respectively) as compared with PR (4.9, 6.3, 2 months respectively). The only dose‐limiting toxicity was peripheral neuropathy (PN), which occurred in 38/70 patients (55%) and was of grade 3–4 in 12 (17%). PN led to a dose reduction or treatment discontinuation in 17 (24%) patients. Complete resolution or improvement of PN occurred in 29/38 (76%) after a median time of 100 d (range: 17–202). Conclusions: Bortezomib in combination with dexamethasone is highly effective in relapsed/refractory MM producing an impressive rate of CR/VGPR, but responses are short‐lived.     

A systematic review of phase II trials of thalidomide/dexamethasone combination therapy in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma

Thalidomide monotherapy in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM) has a response rate of 30%. The combination of thalidomide with dexamethasone (Thal/Dex) is expected to improve responses, but it is unknown if the combination increases the rate of adverse events. Here, we conducted a systematic review of studies evaluating Thal/Dex in relapsed/refractory MM. Twelve studies were included, comprising 451 patients. The response rate (CR and PR) was 46% (95% CI 42-51%). Therapy-related toxicity was comparable to thalidomide monotherapy and included somnolence (26%, 95% CI 22-31%), constipation (37%, 95% CI 32-42%) and peripheral neuropathy (27%, 95% CI 23-32%). Only venous thromboembolism appeared to occur more often with Thal/Dex (5%, 95% CI 3-8%). Thus, using Thal/Dex results in an improved response rate in relapsed/refractory MM, with a toxicity rate comparable to thalidomide monotherapy.     

Long‐term results of the phase II trial of the oral mTOR inhibitor everolimus (RAD001) in relapsed or refractory Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia

Everolimus is an oral raptor mTOR inhibitor and has shown activity in patients with Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia (WM). This study examines a large cohort of patients with relapsed/refractory WM with long‐term follow up for survival. Patients were eligible if they had measurable disease, a platelet count > 75,000 × 10⁶/L, an absolute neutrophil count > 1,000 × 10⁶/L. Patients received everolimus 10 mg PO daily and were evaluated monthly. A success was defined as a complete or partial response (PR); minor responses (MR) were recorded and considered to be of clinical benefit. Sixty patients were enrolled and treated. The overall response rate (ORR) was 50% (all PR); the clinical benefit rate including MR or better was 73% (95% CI: 60–84%) with 23% MR. The median time to response for patients who achieved PR was 2 months (range, 1–26). The median duration of response has not been reached and median progression‐free survival (PFS) was 21 months. Grade 3 or higher toxicities (at least possibly related to everolimus) were observed in 67% of patients. The most common grade 3 or 4 toxicities were anemia (27%), leukopenia (22%), and thrombocytopenia (20%). Other nonhematological toxicities were diarrhea (5%), fatigue (8%), stomatitis (8%) and pulmonary toxicity (5%). Everolimus has a high single‐agent activity of 73% including MR, with a progression free survival of 21 months, indicating that this agent is active in relapsed/refractory WM. Am. J. Hematol. 89:237–242, 2014. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc     

Neurological toxicity of long-term (>1 yr) thalidomide therapy in patients with multiple myeloma

OBJECTIVE: Thalidomide is remarkably active in advanced relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (MM), so that its use has been recently proposed either in newly diagnosed patients or as maintenance treatment after conventional or high-dose therapy. This latter therapeutic approach has risen the concern of side-effects of long-term therapy with this drug. METHODS: We analysed long-term toxicity of 40 patients (27 M, 13 F, median age = 61.5 yr) who received salvage therapy with thalidomide +/- dexamethasone for longer than 12 months (median 15, range 12-44) at our centre. All the patients had achieved at least a stable disease upon treatment with thalidomide alone (200-400 mg/d, n = 20) or thalidomide (200 mg/d) and dexamethasone (40 mg/d for 4 d every 4 wk) (n = 20). RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Neurotoxicity was the most troublesome and frequent toxic effect that was observed after long-term treatment, the incidence averaging 75%. Among these 30 patients symptoms included paraesthesias, tremor and dizziness. Neurotoxicity was grade 1 in six patients (15%); grade 2 in 13 patients (32.5%), thus determining thalidomide dose reduction to 100 mg/d; and grade 3 in 11 patients (27.5%) who had subsequently to interrupt therapy despite their response. Electromyographic study, performed in patients with grade >/=2 neurotoxicity, revealed a symmetrical, mainly sensory peripheral neuropathy, with minor motor involvement. The severity of neurotoxicity was not related to cumulative or daily thalidomide dose, but only to the duration of the disease prior to thalidomide treatment, although no patients presented neurological symptoms at study entry. These results suggest that long-term thalidomide therapy in MM may be hampered by the remarkable neurotoxicity of the drug, and that a neurological evaluation should be mandatory prior to thalidomide treatment, in order to identify patients at risk of developing a peripheral neuropathy.     

Thalidomide salvage therapy following allogeneic stem cell transplantation for multiple myeloma: a retrospective study from the Intergroupe Francophone du Myélome (IFM) and the Société Française de Greffe de Moelle et Thérapie Cellulaire (SFGM-TC)

Thalidomide is effective in multiple myeloma (MM), even in patients who have relapsed after high-dose therapy. A potent graft-versus-myeloma (GVM) effect can be induced against MM after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT). In all, 31 MM patients received thalidomide as a salvage therapy after progression following allo-SCT. The median maximum daily dose of thalidomide was 200 mg (range, 50-600). Thalidomide had to be discontinued in six patients (19%) because of toxicity. In all, nine patients (29%; 95% CI, 13-45) achieved an objective response with thalidomide therapy (six partial and three very good partial responses, VGPR). Five patients developed graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) after thalidomide therapy, including the three patients achieving a VGPR. These data demonstrate that thalidomide is potentially effective in MM patients failing allo-SCT.     

A prospective,international phase 2 study of bortezomib retreatment in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma

Multiple myeloma (MM) typically follows a relapsing course with many patients requiring multiple therapies. This single‐arm phase 2 study prospectively evaluated the efficacy and safety of bortezomib retreatment in MM patients who had relapsed after achieving at least a partial response (≥PR) to prior bortezomib‐based therapy. Patients aged ≥18 years, with measurable, secretory MM, who relapsed ≥6 months after prior bortezomib treatment were eligible. Patients received up to eight cycles of bortezomib (±dexamethasone). The primary endpoint was best confirmed response at retreatment; secondary endpoints included duration of response (DOR), time to progression (TTP), and safety. Adverse events (AEs) were graded by National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 3.0. A total of 130 patients (median of two prior lines of therapy) were enrolled and received retreatment. At retreatment, 28% and 72% of patients received bortezomib and bortezomib‐dexamethasone, respectively. Overall response rate was 40%. In patients who achieved ≥PR, median DOR and TTP were 6·5 and 8·4 months, respectively. Thrombocytopenia was the most common grade ≥3 AE (35%). Forty percent of patients experienced neuropathy events, which improved and resolved in a median of 1·5 and 8·9 months, respectively. In conclusion, bortezomib retreatment was effective and tolerable in relapsed MM patients, with no evidence of cumulative toxicities.     

Combined thalidomide and cyclophosphamide treatment for refractory or relapsed multiple myeloma patients: a prospective phase II study

Thalidomide is an effective agent for patients with refractory multiple myeloma (MM) with a response rate of 30–40% at doses of 200–800 mg but with considerable side effects. We questioned whether lower doses of thalidomide in combination with a daily dose of cyclophosphamide might be an effective regimen with fewer side effects. We included 38 patients with relapsed or refractory MM. The median doses of thalidomide and cyclophosphamide were 100 and 95 mg/day, respectively. Side effects were observed in all patients, with neurotoxicity as the most troublesome. With a median follow-up of 14 months 84% of the patients responded, including 64% partial responses. The median time of progression-free survival was 30 months and the median overall survival time was 20 months. In conclusion, the results demonstrate that the combination of low-dose thalidomide with a daily dose of cyclophosphamide is an effective regimen with a high overall response rate and manageable side effects.This work is financially supported by research funding from the KWF (Dutch Cancer Society)Conflict of interest: There are no financial and personal relationsships with other people or organisations that could inappropriately influence (bias) our work.     

Long‐term results of single‐agent thalidomide as initial therapy for asymptomatic (smoldering or indolent) myeloma

We report the long‐term follow‐up results of a phase II trial of thalidomide for early‐stage multiple myeloma (MM). Patients were eligible if they had smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM) or indolent MM without the need for immediate therapy. Thalidomide was initiated at a dose of 200 mg/day and adjusted as tolerated. Disease progression was defined using modified American Society of Hematology/Food and Drug Administration consensus panel criteria for SMM. Thirty‐one patients were enrolled; 29 (19 SMM and 10 indolent MM) were eligible. The median age was 61 years. Median follow‐up of living patients was 10.2 years (range, 7.5‐11.0 years). Ten patients (34%) had a partial response (PR) and nine had minimal response (MR) for an MR plus PR rate of 66%. The median time to progression (TTP) to symptomatic myeloma was 35 months. Median TTP was 61 months in those achieving PR, 39 months with MR, and 9 months among those failing to achieve either MR or PR, P = 0.005. Median overall survival from diagnosis was 86 months; median survival from onset of symptomatic myeloma was 49 months. Grade 3‐4 nonhematologic adverse events were noted in 55% of patients. Randomized trials are needed to determine the role of early therapy in SMM. Am. J. Hematol., 2010. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

硼替佐米为主的联合方案治疗复发或难治性多发性骨髓瘤

目的 观察硼替佐米为主的联合方案治疗复发、难治性多发性骨髓瘤(MM)的疗效和不良反应,探讨应用硼替佐米治疗的最佳方案、剂量及疗程.方法 复发、难治性MM患者46例,均在3～4周的疗程内,给予硼替佐米1.3 mg/m2,1、4、8、11 d,同时联合地塞米松(D)、D+沙立度胺(T)、环磷酰胺(C)+D、米托蒽醌(M)+D、DC+鬼臼乙叉甙(E)+顺铂(P)和DT-P+阿霉素(A)+CE等化疗方案.采用国际骨髓瘤工作组(IMWG)标准判断疗效,并按美国国立癌症研究院不良事件通用命名标准(NCI CTCAE)(第3版)观察不良反应.以接受沙立度胺为基础的联合方案治疗的49例复发、难治MM作历史对照研究.结果 在可评估的43例患者,中位随访时间10个月,31例获得不同程度的缓解,总有效率为72.1%(对照组为51.0%,P＜0.05).其中完全缓解(CR)5例(11.6%),很好的部分缓解(VGPR)12例(27.9%),部分缓解(PR)14例(32.6%).接受1个疗程和2个疗程的总有效率分别为30.2%、58.1%(P＜0.05).常见的不良反应为血小板减少(62.8%)、乏力(55.8%)、恶心(51.2%)及周围神经病变(30.2%)等,但均能耐受.对照组的不良反应有便秘(69.4%)、乏力(59.2%)和头昏、头晕(46.9%)等.结论 硼替佐米为主的联合方案是一种对复发、难治性MM新的治疗选择,疗效优于沙立度胺为基础的联合方案,且两者毒性谱有所不同.     

Re-evaluation of the role of azathioprine in the treatment of adult chronic idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura: a report on 53 cases

We treated 53 adults (mean age 54 years, range 17-89; 37 females and 16 males) with chronic idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) by azathioprine. All patients had received at least one form of therapy (including splenectomy in 40 patients) and had less than 50 x 10(9)/1 platelets. The duration of ITP before azathioprine was started ranged from 6 to 350 months (median 19). All patients initially received 150 mg/d of azathioprine. This was associated with a short initial course of prednisone (0.3-0.5 mg/kg d) in 10 of them, who were refractory to prednisone alone. 34 (64%) patients responded, including 24 (45%) complete remissions (CR), three (6%) partial remissions (PR) and seven (13%) minor responses (MR). Median time to achieve response was 4 months. 17 of the CR persisted after 7-182 months, 10 of them after discontinuation of azathioprine. Seven patients relapsed after 4-26 months, five of them after azathioprine was stopped or its dose was reduced. PR were short and the median duration of MR was 8 months. Overall, 21 patients (40%) had responses lasting 1 year or more and 17 (32%) lasting 2 years or more. Median duration of treatment was 18 months (range 3-84). Five patients died of bleeding while on treatment. No prognostic factors for response to azathioprine were found. Mild leucopenia was seen in seven patients and a moderate (x3) increase in transaminases in two patients. No opportunistic infections were seen and no malignancy has occurred since the onset of azathioprine. We conclude that azathioprine gives a relatively high incidence of durable responses and very limited side effects in chronic ITP, when splenectomy has failed or is contraindicated. This efficacy, in our experience, is superior to that obtained with other therapeutic approaches. As responses may be delayed, a course of azathioprine of 4 months is required before one can infer a failure to respond. In responding patients, however, the optimum duration of treatment remains to be established.     

Retreatment with bortezomib alone or in combination for patients with multiple myeloma following an initial response to bortezomib

This clinical trial was conducted to determine the safety and efficacy of bortezomib retreatment in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) who had previously responded to bortezomib. Patients with progressive MM who had previously tolerated bortezomib as a single agent or in combination with other drugs, with a minimum of partial response (PR; ≥50% M‐protein reduction) for ≥4 months, who had not received intervening MM therapy, were retreated with bortezomib (days 1, 4, 8, and 11 of a 21‐day cycle) with a starting dose being the dose at which the patient ended the initial treatment. Patients were allowed to receive bortezomib on retreatment in combination with dexamethasone, thalidomide, or doxorubicin. Thirty‐two patients received bortezomib retreatment (most with added dexamethasone). The median treatment‐free interval (last dose of initial bortezomib treatment to first dose of retreatment) was 9.9 (range 2.5–34.0) months. The median duration of retreatment was 2.8 (<1–7.9) months; median total duration of bortezomib treatment was 6.7 (2.5–19.8) months. Based on the investigators' assessment of best response, the overall response rate (complete plus PR) was 50%. The median time from start of retreatment to progressive disease (PD) was 6.6 (95% confidence interval: 5.1–9.6) months. Thirteen patients (41%) experienced PN; bortezomib‐related SAEs were reported in four patients. Retreatment with bortezomib alone or in combination is effective and well tolerated in patients with MM who have responded to their initial bortezomib treatment. Am. J. Hematol., 2009. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Reduction of leukocyte count is associated with thalidomide response in treatment of multiple myeloma

Fifty Taiwanese patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma (MM) were treated with thalidomide on a dose-escalation schedule, commencing with 100 mg/d nightly and incremented either to the maximally tolerated dose or 800 mg/d. Twenty-two patients (44%) responded, with 10 (45.5%) classified as partial remission and 12 (54.5%) minimal response (MR). Complete response did not occur. Of the 28 non-responders, 14 were progressive disease and 14 stable. The median time from commencement of thalidomide treatment to initial achievement of MR was 29 days (range, 8~155), and the corresponding thalidomide dose was 200 mg/d (range, 100~500). The median tolerated dose of thalidomide for the entire sample was 400 mg/d (range, 100~800), with only two (4%) able to tolerate 800 mg/d. Comparing responsive and non-responsive patients, statistically significant differences were not demonstrated for any characteristics except for CRP level and percentage cytogenetic change, which was slightly higher in the latter group relative to the former. Of particular interest, 18 of the 22 responders experienced transient reduction of leukocyte count preceding the attainment of significant reduction in M-proteins in comparison to only four of the 28 non-responders (82% vs. 14%; p<0.001). The median time from commencement of thalidomide treatment to attainment of minimal leukocyte count was 28 days (range, 7~150), with a mean of 2.19×10⁹/l (range, 0.96~3.35×10⁹/l). Leukopenia was generally transient, with rapid recovery despite subsequent continuation of thalidomide. Levels of other non-hematologically adverse effects attributed solely to thalidomide were generally acceptable. For 25 patients, thalidomide treatment was supplemented with low-dose dexamethasone (4 mg, every other day). Of these, 11 had relapsed from and 14 were primarily refractory to thalidomide treatment. Nine of the 25 dexamethasone-supplemented patients were responders (36%). Of particular note were the unusual events noted with this thalidomide-dexamethasone combination, including vascular thrombosis, acute cholecystitis, idiopathic interstitial lung disease and sudden cardiac death. Our results suggest that thalidomide is also effective for Taiwanese patients with refractory and/or relapsed MM. Importantly, the transient reduction in leukocyte count after commencement of thalidomide treatment may serve as a clinical predictor for response. Adverse effects should be carefully monitored when combining thalidomide and dexamethasone, however.     

Early response-based intensification of primary therapy in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients who are eligible for autologous stem cell transplantation: phase II study

This phase II study prospectively evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of an early change in induction therapy before autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in multiple myeloma (MM) patients who failed to achieve more than a partial response (PR) after two cycles of a cyclophosphamide, thalidomide, and dexamethasone (CTD) regimen. Patients aged 18–65 years received two cycles of CTD therapy, and then the patients who achieved more than a PR received two additional cycles of CTD therapy, while those who failed to achieve more than a PR were given intensified therapy with four cycles of a Vel-CD regimen (bortezomib, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone). After completing primary chemotherapy, the patients underwent ASCT. This study initially enrolled 64 patients, although four were excluded. Of the patients, 60 were treated with CTD regimen and 8 patients also had the intensified Vel-CD regimen, of whom five showing improved responses. The overall response rate before ASCT in 59 patients was 94.9 %, including 27.1 % with a stringent complete response/complete response, 23.7 % with a very good partial response (VGPR), and 44.1 % with a PR. The median time to progression (TTP) was 33.2 months (95 % CI, 26.6–34.8). Patients who attained a VGPR or better after ASCT tended to have a longer TTP than the patients who did not (not reached vs. 24.2 months, P?=?0.04). In conclusion, early response-adapted intensification with a Vel-CD regimen was a well-tolerated, effective strategy for improving the response before ASCT in patients with newly diagnosed MM.     

Lenalidomide is effective as salvage therapy in refractory or relapsed multiple myeloma: analysis of the Spanish Compassionate Use Registry in advanced patients

We evaluated the clinical results of lenalidomide (Len) as a compassionate salvage therapy in refractory/relapsed multiple myeloma (MM) patients. A nationwide multi-centre, retrospective research study was performed to evaluate clinical data from patients with advanced MM for which compassionate use of lenalidomide was requested. The primary endpoints were the overall response rate (ORR) and the time to progression (TTP). Secondary objectives included safety and overall survival (OS) since starting of lenalidomide therapy. Data collected from the Spanish Compassionate Use Registry included 111 patients treated in 2006-2008. The median (range) number of previous treatment lines was 3 (1-8). The median duration of lenalidomide treatment while on study was of 4.9?months (1-18). Dexamethasone was given concomitantly with Len in 89% of patients. The ORR was 66% (4% of patients had stringent complete, 11% complete and 11% very good partial responses). Median TTP and OS were 13.0 and 17.4?months, respectively. The depth of response was significantly associated with a longer OS. Toxicity, mainly myelosuppression, was predictable and manageable with Len dose adjustments and cytokine support. Lenalidomide as salvage compassionate therapy in refractory/relapsed MM showed, in this series of heavily pre-treated patients, similar efficacy to that reported in pivotal clinical trials with acceptable tolerance.