Predictors of child-therapist alliance in cognitive-behavioral treatment of children referred for oppositional and antisocial behavior

We examined the therapeutic alliance in evidence-based treatment for children (N=97, 24 girls and 73 boys, ages 6-13 years) referred clinically for oppositional, aggressive, and antisocial behavior. We predicted that the quality of the child-therapist alliance would be related to therapeutic improvements in the children at the end of treatment and that the alliance would be predicted by alliance-relevant child characteristics (intellectual and social competencies) assessed before treatment. Multiple perspectives were obtained to evaluate child characteristics before treatment, alliance during the course of treatment, and therapeutic change at the end of treatment. The main findings were as follows: (1) the child-therapist alliance was related to therapeutic change at the end of treatment. The better the quality of the therapeutic alliance during treatment, the greater the therapeutic change among the children; (2) intellectual and social competencies of the child before treatment predicted the quality of the therapeutic alliance. Children higher in intellectual and social competencies formed a better child-therapist alliance; and (3) intellectual and social competencies did not account for or explain the connection of alliance and therapeutic change. The findings could not easily be attributed to the influence of other domains (socioeconomic disadvantage, parent psychopathology and stress, and severity and scope of child dysfunction) that plausibly might contribute to alliance and therapeutic change or to rater effects (common rater variance) among predictors and outcome criteria. We propose that the next steps for child-alliance research is to better describe factors that contribute to alliance and to explain precisely what mechanisms might be involved that connect alliance during treatment with changes in individual functioning.     

Therapeutic alliance and family-based treatment for adolescents with anorexia nervosa

This pilot study examines the role of therapeutic alliance in relation to weight gain and change in psychological measures during family-based treatment for adolescent anorexia nervosa (AN). Our sample consisted of 14 adolescents with AN and their families. Therapeutic alliance was measured using the System for Observing Family Therapy Alliances Scale. Those adolescents who attained at least 85% of their ideal body weight at the end of treatment had parents who showed a stronger therapeutic alliance with the therapist during the second session of treatment, while adolescents who were remitted on psychological measures showed a higher therapeutic alliance between themselves and the therapist early in treatment. It appears that therapeutic alliance plays an important role in outcome in family-based treatment for AN. Further study is needed in this area to explore the role of the therapist in creating and maintaining a strong therapeutic alliance.     

Client Engagement Characteristics Associated with Problem Gambling Treatment Outcomes

Previous research examining the factors associated with problem gambling treatment outcomes has examined client factors and to date, treatment characteristics, therapist factors, and client-therapist interactions have essentially remained unexplored. This study aimed to investigate how client engagement variables (client-rated therapeutic alliance, therapist-rated therapeutic alliance, number of sessions attended, and client commitment) relate to treatment outcomes (gambling and general functioning) in a sample of 475 treatment-seeking problem gambling clients using a series of hierarchical regression analyses. Client-rated therapeutic alliance predicted both gambling and general functioning outcomes, but therapist-rated therapeutic alliance only predicted general functioning outcomes. There was no significant relationship between number of sessions and outcomes, but client commitment predicted gambling outcomes. Client satisfaction only mediated the relationships between therapeutic alliance and treatment outcomes. Taken together, the findings indicate that client engagement characteristics, in particular the therapeutic relationship, are active agents of change in psychological interventions for problem gambling.     

Therapeutic alliance in cognitive therapy for schizophrenic and other long-term mentally ill patients: development and relationship to outcome in an in-patient treatment programme

A total of 26 schizophrenic and other long-term mentally ill patients receiving cognitive therapy sessions twice a week in the context of a comprehensive in-patient treatment programme were assessed every 5 weeks with regard to therapeutic alliance. The therapists rated the alliance according to the Psychotherapy Status Report and the patients rated it according to the Patient Collaboration Scale. The results showed either good or fair and stable therapeutic alliance for the majority of the patients throughout the treatment period. Few correlations were found between patient characteristics and initial alliance. The therapists' ratings showed a positive relationship between initial alliance and a favourable outcome of treatment at discharge.     

Therapeutic alliance in schizophrenia: The role of recovery orientation,self-stigma,and insight

The present study examined variables related to the quality of the therapeutic alliance in out-patients with schizophrenia. We expected recovery orientation and insight to be positively, and self-stigma to be negatively associated with a good therapeutic alliance. We expected these associations to be independent from age, clinical symptoms (i.e. positive and negative symptoms, depression), and more general aspects of relationship building like avoidant attachment style and the duration of treatment by the current therapist. The study included 156 participants with DSM-IV diagnoses of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder in the maintenance phase of treatment. Therapeutic alliance, recovery orientation, self-stigma, insight, adult attachment style, and depression were assessed by self-report. Symptoms were rated by interviewers. Hierarchical multiple regressions revealed that more recovery orientation, less self-stigma, and more insight independently were associated with a better quality of the therapeutic alliance. Clinical symptoms, adult attachment style, age, and the duration of treatment by current therapist were unrelated to the quality of the therapeutic alliance. Low recovery orientation and increased self-stigma might undermine the therapeutic alliance in schizophrenia beyond the detrimental effect of poor insight. Therefore in clinical settings, besides enhancing insight, recovery orientation, and self-stigma should be addressed.     

“Straight Up”: Enhancing Rapport and Therapeutic Alliance with Previously-Detained Youth in the Delivery of Mental Health Services

A strong therapeutic alliance has been shown to improve mental health treatment outcomes in adults, but this topic has not been fully explored with youth. Adolescents, particularly justice-involved youth, stand to benefit greatly from an improved treatment experience. One quality which can improve treatment is mental health providers’ interpersonal skills when attempting to build a therapeutic rapport with adolescent clients. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 19 youth who screened positive for mental health concerns while in juvenile detention. Four themes were identified as important to improving the therapeutic alliance: Empathy, client-directed care, sequencing, and positive rapport. Suggestions for strengthening a therapeutic alliance are provided.     

The therapeutic alliance in internet interventions: A narrative review and suggestions for future research

Objectives: Research on Internet interventions has grown rapidly over the recent years and evidence is growing that Internet-based treatments often result in similar outcomes as conventional face-to-face psychotherapy. Yet there are still unanswered concerns such as whether a therapeutic alliance can be established over the Internet and whether the alliance is important in this new treatment format. Methods: A narrative review of studies formally assessing the therapeutic alliance in Internet interventions was conducted. It is the first review summarizing findings on the therapeutic alliance that (i) distinguishes between different forms of Internet interventions and (ii) does not restrict itself to specific Internet-based treatment formats such as guided self-help treatments, e-mail or videoconferencing therapies. Results: Independent of communication modalities, diagnostic groups and amount of contact between clients and therapists, client-rated alliance scores were high, roughly equivalent to alliance ratings found in studies on face-to-face therapy. Mixed results were found regarding the therapist-rated alliance and alliance-outcome associations. Conclusions: The review points to the limitations of the available evidence and identifies unanswered questions. It is concluded that one of the major tasks for future research is to identify unique characteristics of the therapeutic alliance in the different treatment formats.     

Therapeutic alliance and psychiatric severity as predictors of completion of treatment for opioid dependence

OBJECTIVE: The role of patient characteristics and the strength of the therapeutic alliance in predicting completion of treatment by opioid-dependent patients was examined. METHODS: Information about patient characteristics and scores on subscales of the Addiction Severity Index (ASI) were obtained for 114 patients at intake to a buprenorphine treatment program lasting three to four months. The strength of the therapeutic alliance was assessed by the Helping Alliance Questionnaire (HAQ). Patients were classified as treatment completers or noncompleters, and logistical regression examined predictors of treatment completion. RESULTS: Only two variables significantly predicted treatment completion: severity of psychiatric symptoms and interaction between HAQ scores and psychiatric severity. Patients with fewer psychiatric symptoms were more likely to complete treatment. The strength of the therapeutic alliance was not related to treatment completion among patients with few psychiatric symptoms, and 62 percent of these patients completed treatment. In contrast, among patients with moderate to severe psychiatric problems, less than 25 percent with weak therapeutic alliances completed treatment, while more than 75 percent with strong therapeutic alliances completed treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The results underscore the importance of early identification of opioid-dependent patients with moderate to severe levels of psychopathology. In this patient subgroup, a strong therapeutic alliance may be an essential condition for successful treatment.     

Alliance thérapeutique avec les mères et évolution clinique des enfants d'un hôpital de jour

This two-year prospective study in a French child psychiatry day hospital assesses relationship between therapeutic alliance and clinical progress. Thirty-three 3-10 year-old children (18 with pervasive developmental disorders and 15 with mixed behaviour disorders) were assessed regarding their symptom status and developmental progress, while receiving multi modal intervention package. Independently, the treatment staff assessed the therapeutic alliance with the parents by standardized ratings on the French modified Helping Alliance questionnaire from Luborsky. The statistical study shows that a mother's good therapeutic alliance correlate significantly with the social functioning improvement but not regarding the symptom status. As North-American therapeutic alliance adult's studies, this first child psychiatry unit study seems to show that the parent therapeutic alliance is a predictor factor of child outcome independently of age and pathological child status.     

Metacognition as a predictor of therapeutic alliance over 26 weeks of psychotherapy in schizophrenia

Research to identify client factors that impact treatment outcome has found that deficits in metacognitive abilities and weaker therapeutic alliance are both associated with poorer treatment outcomes for schizophrenia. However, it is unknown if metacognition and therapeutic alliance are related in any way, in particular, if metacognitive abilities predict therapeutic alliance. This study explored whether differing capacities for mastery, a domain of metacognition that involves the ability to use knowledge about mental states to respond to psychological challenges, predicted client perceptions of therapeutic alliance assessed by the Working Alliance Inventory - Short Form (WAI-S). Participants were 63 adults with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder enrolled in a 6-month program of cognitive behavioral or supportive therapy, placed into a high, intermediate or minimal mastery group as measured by the Metacognitive Assessment Scale (MAS). Repeated measures ANOVA found group effects for the total WAI-S score, with the high and intermediate mastery groups having better alliance scores than the minimal mastery group. The group effects approached significance when neurocognition was controlled for. Results suggest that greater capacity for mastery predict stronger therapeutic alliance, but do not predict its development over time.     

Neurocognitive correlates of therapeutic alliance in schizophrenia

Although therapeutic alliance in schizophrenia has been linked with treatment adherence and outcome, less is known about its clinical correlates. This study explored neurocognition as a possible predictor of perceived therapeutic alliance among people with schizophrenia in cognitive behavior therapy. Twenty-four participants with schizophrenia spectrum disorders and their therapists were administered the Working Alliance Inventory, Short Form after 3 months of therapy. Totals for clients and therapists were correlated with measures of verbal memory, premorbid intelligence, visual spatial reasoning, executive function, and attention, all obtained before beginning therapy. Poorer performance on verbal memory was significantly related to client report of stronger alliance, whereas better performance on visual spatial reasoning was significantly related to therapist report of stronger alliance. Client and therapist ratings of therapeutic alliance were significantly and positively related. Clients' abilities may differentially affect therapist and client perception of therapeutic alliance in schizophrenia.     

Suicide Ideation Is Related to Therapeutic Alliance in a Brief Therapy for Attempted Suicide

The objective of this study was to investigate the role of therapeutic alliance on suicide ideation as outcome measure in a brief therapy for patients who attempted suicide. Sixty patients received the 3-session therapy supplemented by follow-up contact through regular letters. Therapeutic alliance was measured with the Helping Alliance Questionnaire (HAQ). Outcome at 6 and 12 months was measured with the Beck Scale for Suicide Ideation (BSS). Therapeutic alliance increased from session 1 to session 3. Higher alliance measures correlated with lower suicidal ideation at 12 months follow-up. A history of previous attempts and depression had a negative affect on therapeutic alliance. The results suggest that in the treatment of suicidal patients therapeutic alliance may be a moderating factor for reducing suicide ideation.     

Dropout and therapeutic alliance: a meta-analysis of adult individual psychotherapy

This meta-analytic review of 11 studies examined the relationship between psychotherapy dropout and therapeutic alliance in adult individual psychotherapy. Results of the meta-analysis demonstrate a moderately strong relationship between psychotherapy dropout and therapeutic alliance (d = .55). Findings indicate that clients with weaker therapeutic alliance are more likely to drop out of psychotherapy. The meta-analysis included a total of 1,301 participants, with an average of 118 participants per study, a standard deviation of 115 participants, and a range from 20 to 451 participants per study. Exploratory analyses were conducted to determine the influence of variables moderating the relationship between alliance and dropout. Client educational history, treatment length, and treatment setting were found to moderate the relationship between alliance and dropout. Studies with a larger percentage of clients who completed high school or higher demonstrated weaker relationships between alliance and dropout. Studies with lengthier treatments demonstrated stronger relationships between alliance and dropout. Inpatient settings demonstrated significantly larger effects than both counseling centers and research clinics. No significant differences were found between client-rated, therapist-rated, and observer/staff-rated alliance. Recommendations for clinicians and researchers are discussed.     

Engagement and Empathy: A Pilot Study of the Therapeutic Alliance in Outpatient Child Psychiatry

The therapeutic alliance has been a neglected area of study within child psychiatry and psychology. Using an unselected outpatient series, a number of approaches to capturing components of the treatment alliance were investigated in relation to other characteristics of the case and the reported outcome. Engagement in treatment explained more of the variance in outcome than any other factor, including demographic variables or type of treatment. Engagement in treatment itself was found to be most linked to the patient's experience of accurate empathy from the therapist. Ideas for further study of the therapeutic alliance in children's treatments are discussed.     

Negative symptoms and poor insight as predictors of the similarity between client and therapist ratings of therapeutic alliance in cognitive behavior therapy for patients with schizophrenia

Recent studies have found that clients with schizophrenia rate therapeutic alliance more highly than therapists. Unclear is whether there are clinical characteristics which predict the degree of difference in client and therapist ratings. To explore this, we correlated client and therapist ratings of therapeutic alliance with baseline assessments of positive negative, and disorganized symptoms and awareness of need for treatment. Participants were 40 adults with schizophrenia enrolled in a 6-month program of cognitive behavior therapy. Results indicated that clients produced higher ratings of therapeutic alliance than therapists and that therapist and client general ratings were more disparate when clients had fewer negative symptoms and better insight. Higher overall client ratings of therapeutic alliance were linked to lower levels of positive, negative, and disorganized symptoms and better awareness of need for treatment. Higher overall therapist ratings were linked only to lower levels of disorganized symptoms among clients.     

Racism and Social Action

Objective: The therapeutic alliance is possibly a crucial factor in treatment for borderline personality disorder (BPD). Among predictors of therapeutic alliance, aspects that have not yet been considered are metacognition or the patient’s capacity to be aware of mental states. We therefore explored whether metacognition predicted alliance and if metacognition and therapeutic alliance together predicted outcome in brief treatment for BPD.

Method: In a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial, we included N = 36 patients with BPD in the current study. The original trial assessed the effects of a 10 session psychiatric standard treatment with or without the added the Plan Analysis and the Motive Oriented Therapeutic Relationship. We assessed the therapeutic alliance session by session (Working Alliance Inventory), metacognition at session 1 (using the Metacognitive Assessment Scale-Revised) and outcome (using residual gains on the Outcome Questionnaire-45.2 between sessions 1 and 10).

Results: A more differentiated capacity to understand the mind of the others at treatment onset predicted an increase of therapist-rated alliance over time. Therapist rated alliance was the only significant outcome predictor (B = ?0.85, R Squared = .12).

Conclusions: More differentiated metacognition predicted therapeutic alliance which in turn affected outcome, thus making metacognition a relevant therapy target early in therapy for BPD. Future studies should expand this investigation to patients with better functioning, treated with different modalities and with longer treatments.     

The importance of the theoretical framework in the formulation of clinical inferences in psychotherapy

Abstract

This article presents an intensive study of the outcome and process of the psychotherapeutic treatments conducted at the Blanquerna Psychotherapy Service in Barcelona. It analyzes in detail the relation between outcome (improvement) and process (therapeutic alliance). Specifically, it discusses (a) the therapeutic process in terms of the relation between therapeutic alliance and psychotherapy outcome and (b) the effects of the temporary weakening of the therapeutic alliance and temporary symptomatic relapse on therapeutic outcome and process. Two hundred thirty-nine clients were included in the study, and the assessment instruments were the CORE Outcome Measure and the short version of the Working Alliance Inventory. In addition to good outcome of psychotherapy and maintenance of therapeutic change after treatment, the results also demonstrated the significance of different aspects of the therapeutic alliance as predictors of the therapeutic outcome and process.     

A collaborative approach to the treatment alliance in bipolar disorder

OBJECTIVES: The treatment alliance is the arena in which psychopharmacological and other therapeutic interventions occur. The nature and quality of the treatment alliance may affect adherence to treatment and the realization of the benefits of effective pharmacological treatment in clinical practice. It is an area that has attracted little systematic study, despite the available evidence suggesting that it plays a measurable role in clinical outcomes. METHODS: A literature search was undertaken using Medline, Ovid, Psychinfo and Science Direct from 1975 to 2004. The following key words were used: bipolar disorder, patient adherence, non-adherence to medication, compliance, doctor-patient relationship, doctor-patient communication, treatment alliance, therapeutic alliance, chronic illness management, collaborative care, self-management, health beliefs, self-efficacy, self-determination, autonomy support, motivational interviewing. RESULTS: Psychosocial interventions have demonstrated positive effects on adherence problems. Studies of the impact of the treatment alliance on outcomes in mental illness highlight the possibilities of fruitful research in this area in bipolar disorder. Different theoretical models of changing health related behaviour may inform approaches to the treatment alliance. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest the usefulness of a collaborative approach to the treatment alliance. Attention needs to be given to developing intervention models that target modifiable risk factors for non-adherence and address patient, clinician and illness related variables to enhance medication adherence in the treatment alliance. Refinement of these models through controlled evaluation in real world settings may lead to integration in health care delivery systems.     

The therapeutic alliance in the treatment of personality disorders

Because personality disorders are associated with significant impairment in interpersonal relationships, special issues and problems arise in the formation of a therapeutic alliance in the treatment of patients with these disorders. In particular, patients with narcissistic, borderline, and paranoid personality traits are likely to have troubled interpersonal attitudes and behaviors that will complicate the patient's engagement with the therapist. While a strong positive therapeutic alliance is predictive of more successful treatment outcomes, strains and ruptures in the alliance may lead to premature termination of treatment. Therefore, clinicians need to consider the patient's characteristic way of relating in order to select appropriate interventions to effectively retain and involve the patient in treatment. Research has shown not only the importance of building an alliance but also that this alliance is vital in the earliest phase of treatment. The author first reviews several definitions of the therapeutic alliance with reference to how they apply to the treatment of patients with personality disorders. Issues relevant to forming a therapeutic alliance with patients with personality disorders are then discussed in terms of the three DSM-IV-TR personality disorder clusters. However, the author notes that these categories do not adequately capture the complexity of character pathology and that clinicians also need to consider which aspects of a patient's personality pathology are dominant at the moment in considering salient elements of the therapeutic alliance. In dealing with Cluster A personality disorders (schizotypal, schizoid, and paranoid personality disorders), what is most relevant for alliance building is the profound impairment in interpersonal relationships. The Cluster B "dramatic" personality disorders (antisocial, borderline, histrionic, and narcissistic) are all associated with pushing the limits. Consequently, clinicians need to exercise great care to avoid crossing inappropriate lines in a quest to build an alliance with patients with one of these disorders. Patients with Cluster C "anxious/fearful" personality disorders (avoidant, dependent, and obsessive-compulsive personality disorders) are emotionally inhibited and averse to interpersonal conflict. These patients frequently feel guilty and internalize blame for situations even when there is none, a tendency that may facilitate alliance building because the patients are willing to take some responsibility for their dilemma and may engage somewhat more readily with the therapist to sort it out, compared with patients with more severe Cluster A or B diagnoses. The author then reviews considerations relevant to treatment alliance that arise in the different treatment approaches that may be used with patients with personality disorders, including psychodynamic psychotherapy/psychoanalysis, cognitive-behavioral therapies, and psychopharmacology. The author also discusses issues, especially splitting, that arise in the alliance when patients with personality disorders are treated in inpatient psychiatric hospital settings.     

Predictive value of object relations for therapeutic alliance and outcome in psychotherapy for depression: an exploratory study

The concept of object relations has been shown to be relevant for the process and outcome of psychodynamic psychotherapies. However, little is known about its relevance for the psychotherapeutic treatment of depression. In this study, we explored the predictive value of object relational functioning (ORF) for the therapeutic alliance and outcome of short-term psychodynamic supportive psychotherapy in patients with mild to moderately severe depression. The ORF of 81 patients was rated by using the Developmental Profile. The overall maturity of ORF measured at baseline was higher in patients who showed a better treatment response. In multiple regression analysis, the adaptive level of individuation appeared to be specifically predictive of outcome. Patients with a recurrent depression showed less mature levels of ORF, lower adaptive levels and a higher score on the symbiotic level. No association was found between ORF and therapeutic alliance during treatment. In contrast to the single measure of alliance early in therapy, the growth of the alliance was related to outcome. The study indicated the relevance of ORF for depression and established that it is distinctive from the actual therapeutic alliance.