A quantitative approach to lower extremity vein repair

OBJECTIVE: We prospectively investigated the patency of venous repair in a quantitative fashion with measurement of vein blood flow velocities after lower extremity injuries caused by either military or civilian trauma. MATERIAL AND METHODS: During a 10-year study period (March 1990 to December 2000), surgical intervention was performed after lower extremity vascular injuries in 130 patients. Most of these patients were men (n = 125), with a mean age of 23 +/- 5 years (range, 17 to 44 years). One hundred ten direct venous injuries were identified in 97 patients, involving the common femoral vein in seven, the deep femoral vein in three, the superficial femoral vein in nine, the popliteal vein in 46, and the posterior tibial (n = 21), anterior tibial (n = 17), or peroneal veins (n = 7) in 45. Popliteal vein thrombosis without apparent venous injury was found in seven patients. Bone fractures (n = 45), nerve injuries (n = 27), or extensive tissue loss (n = 7) often were associated with vascular injuries. Duplex color ultrasonography was used to evaluate patency and to measure blood flow velocity in repaired veins during the early postoperative period and at the time of late follow-up examinations. RESULTS: Significant differences were seen in venous blood flow velocities between severe (extremity diameter more than twice normal) and moderate (diameter 1.5 to 2 times normal) reperfusion injuries. The mean flow velocity in repaired popliteal veins was 15 +/- 2 cm/s with severe reperfusion injuries compared with 8.4 +/- 1.1 cm/s with moderate reperfusion injuries (P <.0001). Flow velocities were lower than 5 cm/s in repaired infrapopliteal veins, and most of these veins occluded on the first postoperative day. Amputations were necessary in 11 patients, all of whom had both tibial fractures and extensive tissue loss. Sodium warfarin therapy was routinely administrated before hospital discharge. The mean follow-up period was 6.2 years (range, 1.3 to 10 years). Repaired common femoral and superficial femoral veins had relatively high patency rates (100% and 89% at 1 year, 100% and 78% at 6 years, respectively), whereas the patency rates for repaired popliteal veins were disappointing (86% at 1 year, 60% at 6 years). All seven popliteal veins that required thrombectomy in the absence of direct injuries remained patent, however. Patch angioplasty had the highest 6-year patency rate (75%) in comparison with all other techniques that were used for venous injuries (lateral repair, 58%; end-to-end anastomosis, 43%; saphenous vein graft interposition, 36%). CONCLUSION: Venous repair has a high patency rate at the femoral and popliteal levels, but the patency rate for infrapopliteal venous repair is extremely poor because of low flow velocities. Therefore, we conclude that repair of infrapopliteal venous injuries is unnecessary.     

Femoral venous trauma: techniques for surgical management and early results

During a 4 year period (1979 through 1983), 181 major arterial (69 percent) and 81 venous (31 percent) injuries were treated surgically. Of the venous injuries, 24 (30 percent) involved the femoral veins (9 common femoral, 15 superficial femoral). Management of these femoral venous injuries included lateral venorrhaphy in 10 cases (42 percent), venous patch angioplasty in 5 cases (21 percent), end-to-end anastomosis in 4 cases (17 percent), interposition autogenous saphenous vein grafts in 3 patients (12 percent), and ligation in 2 cases (8 percent). One case that included common femoral venous ligation and one that included a failed interposition saphenous vein graft in the superficial femoral vein subsequently were managed with in situ saphenous vein bypass. For one interposition saphenous vein graft repair of the common femoral vein we utilized the spiral vein graft technique. Excluding one early death from associated injuries and one superficial femoral venous injury managed by ligation without postoperative complications, 17 of 23 (74 percent) femoral venous repairs were judged patent postoperatively (13 confirmed by venography and 4 by noninvasive testing). The adjuvant use of intermittent pneumatic calf compression and low molecular weight dextran appears to have been beneficial in maintaining patency of the femoral venous repairs. Early clinical follow-up demonstrated the presence of edema in 6 of 8 cases (75 percent) initially treated by ligation or complicated by postoperative occlusion. Early postoperative edema, present in 4 of 17 (24 percent) patients with patent venous repairs, had resolved by the time of discharge. We recommend routine repair of femoral venous injuries. When significant edema or ischemia develop following obligatory venous ligation or postoperative occlusion of a venous repair, revision or venous bypass should be considered.     

A temporary arteriovenous shunt (Scribner) in the management of traumatic venous injuries of the lower extremity

The use of a temporary arteriovenous shunt distal to the repair of a traumatic venous injury of the lower extremity in eight patients is reported. Three patients sustained injury to the superficial femoral vein, three had common femoral vein injuries, one had a through-and-through injury of common iliac vein, and one had a popliteal venous injury. Seven patients had associated arterial injuries. Venous repairs included four vein patches, two end-to-end anastomoses, a single venography, and one autogenous vein interposition graft. At the end of each operation, a distal A-V shunt utilizing the posterior tibial artery and vein was constructed. In two patients the shunt clotted within hours after insertion and could not be reopened. In the remaining six patients, the temporary A-V shunt was left in place an average of 10 days (range, 3-15). Followup venograms obtained 2 to 15 days postoperatively revealed patent venous repairs in all patients whose shunt remained functional for 72 hours or more. Noninvasive Doppler studies were obtained in four patients 3 to 8 months post repair and revealed no evidence of deep venous obstruction. No patient with a functioning distal A-V shunt had significant limb edema following repair. This technique appears to improve patency rates of venous repairs and has several distinct advantages over previously described A-V anastomotic fistulas.     

Interposition graft with polytetrafluoroethylene for mesenteric and portal vein reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy

Background:

Portal vein–superior mesenteric vein resection is frequently required after surgical resection of tumours of the pancreas head. The ideal graft for portal vein reconstruction (PVR) remains undefined.

Methods:

Between May 2000 and July 2007, 28 patients had portal vein–superior mesenteric vein resection and PVR during pancreaticoduodenectomy. Their clinical reports were reviewed retrospectively with specific attention to the methods of PVR and outcomes.

Results:

Ten patients had PVR with primary anastomosis, seven had PVR with autologous vein, one had a polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) patch, one did not have PVR and nine had PVR with a PTFE interposition graft. There was no infection after PTFE grafting. Six patients had PVR thrombosis after surgery: four after primary anastomosis, one after interposition PTFE and one after vein repair.

Conclusion:

PTFE appeared to be an effective and safe option as an interposition graft for portomesenteric venous reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Copyright © 2009 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Surgical experience with expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) as a replacement graft for traumatized vessels.

With the increased nationwide incidence of major vascular injuries, the need for interposition grafting has become quite common in major trauma centers. Despite extensive experience with such injuries, the choice of a substitute conduit remains controversial. Recent studies have demonstrated the potential of expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) as a replacement graft for small arteries and veins. The surgical services at the Ben Taub General Hospital began to use PTFE grafts in traumatic vascular wounds approximately 2 years ago. Eight axillary arteries and 12 brachial arteries have had interposition grafting with PTFE prostheses. Eleven patients have required PTFE interposition grafts in repair of traumatized common, superficial, and profunda femoris arteries and common femoral veins; eight patients had reconstruction in the popliteal artery or vein. Three patients had renal artery revascularization procedures following blunt abdominal trauma, three patient had segmental replacement of the superior mesenteric artery following gunshot wounds, and one carotid artery, one iliac vein, and two axillary veins were grafted with PTFE. All patients with segmental repair of axillary, brachial, femoral, and popliteal vessels have maintained good distal pulses and viable extremities. No grafts have thrombosed, nor become infected, in spite of soft-tissue injury encountered at time or repair. In situations requiring interposition graft placement for reestablishment of distal flow in small arteries and veins, PTFE grafts appear to be an acceptable prosthesis.     

The early fate of venous repair after civilian vascular trauma. A clinical, hemodynamic, and venographic assessment.

Repair of major venous injuries of the extremities has been advocated to improve limb salvage rates and to prevent the early and late sequelae of venous interruption. The contribution of venous repair to the surgical outcome remains controversial, however, in part because the fate of venous reconstruction has previously not been well defined. The current study was done to determine the early patency rate of venous repair, to compare the accuracy of various methods used to assess venous patency, and to analyze the relationship between early venous patency and surgical outcome. During a recent 27-month period, 36 patients with major extremity venous injuries were treated by venous reconstruction; 34 patients (94%) had an associated major arterial injury that also required repair. Venous repair was performed in the upper extremity (22%) as well as the lower extremity (78%) using various reconstructive methods, including lateral repair (17%), end-to-end anastomosis (11%), autogenous vein patching (25%), interposition autogenous vein grafting (42%), and panelled autogenous vein grafting (6%). After operation, venous repair patency was evaluated by clinical examination, impedence plethysmography, and Doppler ultrasonography, and contrast venography. There were no perioperative deaths in these 36 patients. The limb salvage rate was 100% and all 34 major arterial repairs were patent at the time of hospital discharge. Venography performed on the seventh postoperative day demonstrated that 14 venous repairs had thrombosed (39%) and that 22 had remained patent (61%). Local venous repair had a significantly lower thrombosis rate (21%) than those requiring interposition vein grafting (59%) (p less than 0.03). Compared with venography, the clinical evaluation was 67% accurate in the assessment of venous repair patency, and the noninvasive examination was 53% accurate. In conclusion, a substantial percentage of venous repairs will thrombose in the postoperative period, especially if interposition vein grafting is used. However, in this series limb salvage was not adversely influenced by an unexpectedly high rate of venous repair thrombosis. In addition, clinical evaluation and noninvasive testing did not provide an accurate assessment of venous patency after venous repair.     

Dual function of the distal arteriovenous fistula for maintenance of arterial and venous prosthetic graft patency in the lower extremity

Venous hypertension, severe swelling, and tissue necrosis occurred in a limb previously subjected to distal arterial bypass plus adjunctive arteriovenous fistula. Occlusion of the popliteal vein had not been recognized during the early treatment period. Subsequent to identification of this mechanism, limb salvage was achieved with an interposition graft of the popliteal vein using externally supported PTFE. The prereconstruction venous pressure gradient of 29 cm H2O was virtually abolished immediately after reestablishing venous outflow. The distal arteriovenous fistula, initially established to maintain prosthetic arterial graft patency, now serves, in this case, a dual function by additionally maintaining prosthetic venous graft patency. An intact deep venous system is critical for achieving successful arterial reconstruction and to avoid the complications associated with an occluded outflow tract in the face of augmented inflow.     

Management of traumatic peripheral vein injuries: Primary repair or vein ligation

The management and outcome of 83 patients who had 86 venous injuries were retrospectively reviewed to identify optimal management techniques in patients with peripheral vein injuries. Venous injuries of the arms were associated with no long-term sequelae, and management with vein ligation appears safe. In patients with venous injuries of the legs, primary repair by lateral suture or primary end-to-end reanastomosis is recommended when technically easy. In patients who are unstable or in whom primary repair cannot be performed, vein ligation is recommended. Autogenous vein interposition grafting appears indicated only in the popliteal area when vein reconstitution should be aggressively sought. Vein ligation in peripheral vein injuries should be followed with aggressive postoperative management to prevent the development of distal edema. Limb elevation is effective in minimizing the development of adverse sequelae.     

Short-Term Results of A Randomized Trial Comparing Remote Endarterectomy and Supragenicular Bypass Surgery for Long Occlusions of the Superficial Femoral Artery [The REVAS Trial]

ObjectiveTechniques for surgical repair of Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC) C and D lesions of the superficial femoral artery (SFA) are supragenicular bypass grafting or the less invasive remote endarterectomy (RSFAE). This trial compares the patency rates of both techniques.DesignRandomized, multicenter trial.Materials and methods116 patients were randomized to RSFAE (n = 61) and supragenicular bypass surgery (n = 55). Indications for surgery were claudication (n = 77), rest pain (n = 21), or tissue loss (n = 18).ResultsMedian hospital stay was 4 days in the RSFAE group compared with 6 days in the bypass group (p = 0.004). Primary patency after 1-year follow-up was 61% for RSFAE and 73% for bypass (p = 0.094). Secondary patency was 79% for both groups. Subdividing between venous (n = 25) and prosthetic grafts (n = 30) shows a primary patency of 89% and 63% respectively at 1-year follow-up (p = 0.086).ConclusionRSFAE is a minimally invasive adjunct in the treatment of TASC C and D lesions of the SFA, with shorter admittance and a comparable secondary patency rate to bypass. The venous bypass is superior to both RSFAE and PTFE bypass surgery, but only 45% of patients had a sufficient saphenous vein available.This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00566436.     

Management and short-term patency of lower extremity venous injuries with various repairs

BACKGROUND: Although several methods of repair of extremity venous injuries have been shown to be efficacious, patency rates have varied significantly from center to center. METHODS: A retrospective review was made of treatment outcomes of adult and pediatric patients with major venous injuries of the lower extremity. RESULTS: From 1997 to 2002, 82 patients sustained 86 major lower extremity venous injuries. Venous injuries were treated with primary repair in 27, complex repair in 37 (autogenous vein, 10, and ringed polytetrafluoroethylene [PTFE], 27) and ligation in 20. Prior to repair, temporary intraluminal venous shunts were used in 18 patients. Follow-up duplex imaging or venography or both were performed on 42 extremities at a mean of 10.9 +/- 7.1 days after repair with an overall patency rate of 73.8% (primary repair 76.5%; autogenous vein graft 66.7%; and PTFE 73.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Overall early patency rate of venous repairs performed by an experienced trauma team is similar irrespective of the type of repair. The use of temporary intraluminal shunts is acceptable in selected circumstances, while ringed PTFE grafts are reasonable alternatives when the contralateral saphenous vein is too small.     

Surgical treatment of popliteal artery injuries.

Twenty-seven patients with injury to the popliteal artery and associated structures were operated on during the past 15 years. There was no operative or hospital deaths. The limb salvage rate was 56%; the amputation rate was 44%. Those patients with penetrating injuries were found to have a much better salvage rate (85%) than those with blunt trauma (29%). Preoperative arteriography and immediate repair of the popliteal artery by either end-to-end anastomosis or a vein graft is advocated for these patients. Popliteal vein injuries should be repaired when possible by lateral suture or end-to-end anastomosis. Fasciotomy is advocated on a selected basis.     

Balloon Angioplasty as the Primary Treatment for Failing Infra-inguinal Vein Grafts

BackgroundWe sought to evaluate the role of balloon angioplasty as the primary modality in the management of vein graft stenoses.MethodsPatients who underwent infrainguinal vein graft bypass from January 2002 to December 2007 were enrolled into a surveillance program. Grafts which developed critical stenoses were identified and underwent urgent angiography with a view to angioplasty of the stenotic lesion. Lesions which were deemed unsuitable for angioplasty underwent urgent surgical repair.ResultsFour hundred and eleven grafts were followed up for a median of 19 months (range: 2–61). Ninety-six grafts (22.6%) developed critical stenosis. Twelve grafts occluded prior to repair and one was not intervened upon electively. Eight grafts underwent primary surgical repair. Seventy-six grafts underwent 99 endovascular procedures. Technical success was achieved in 60 grafts (78.9%). Of the grafts in which technical success had not been achieved, eight underwent repeat angioplasty and three were surgically repaired. Twenty-four grafts underwent repeat angioplasty for re-stenosis with a technical success rate of 71%. No difference was observed in graft patency (P = 0.08) or amputation rates (P = 0.32) between the grafts requiring intervention to maintain patency, and grafts which did not. Smoking [OR: 2.61 (95% CI: 1.51–4.53), (P = 0.006)], diabetes [OR: 2.55 (95% CI: 1.49–4.35), (P = 0.006)], renal failure [OR: 1.89 (95% CI: 1.19–3.38), (P = 0.040)] and recurrent stenosis [OR: 3.22 (95% CI: 1.63–4.69), (P < 0.001)] were risk factors for graft occlusion.ConclusionsBalloon angioplasty of failing infrainguinal vein bypass grafts is safe and can be performed with an acceptable medium term patency rate, albeit with a significant risk of re-stenosis which can be successfully treated in most patients using repeat endovascular intervention.     

A RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS OF INFRA-INGUINAL ARTERIAL RECONSTRUCTION: THREE YEAR PATENCY RATES

Primary infra-inguinal arterial reconstructions were reviewed for primary patency and outcome of thrombosis in 144 patients. Distal anastomoses in these patients were to the popliteal artery and were above the knee in 63, below the knee in 53 and at the tibial level in 28. The treatment used was: polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) in 33 cases, PTFE with an interposition vein cuff in 29 cases, autogenous saphenous vein (ASV) in situ in 47 cases, and reversed technique in 26 cases. Life table analysis showed a 59% overall primary patency at 3 years. Patency rates of above knee anastomoses (65%) and below knee (61%) were statistically different from the tibial anastomoses (42%. P = 0.005). In both above and below knee popliteal anastomoses there was a statistically significant difference in the patency of ASV and the PTFE/vein cuff technique (P= 0.0006) but there was no difference between ASV and FTFE. There was no difference in patency rates for the various types of grafts with tibial anastomoses. Data were analysed at 3 years, taking into account the variables of smoking, diabetes or indications for surgery respectively and no difference was found in patency. The number and calibre of the run-off vessels did not influence patency significantly, hence anastomosis to any good quality vessel regardless of run-off is recommended. The poor results with the interposition vein cuff technique are unexplained but this study suggests that the technique should he reserved for anastomoses below the popliteal artery.     

Prosthetic Graft for Superior Mesenteric-Portal Vein Reconstruction in Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Retrospective,Multicenter Study

Background

The use of prosthetic grafts for superior mesenteric-portal vein reconstruction (SMPVR) after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) with venous resection remains controversial. We evaluated the effectiveness and safety of using polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) interposition grafts for SMPVR after PD.

Methods

We identified 76 patients who underwent PD with segmental vein resection for pancreatic head and periampullary neoplasms at three centers between January 2007 and June 2012. The venous reconstruction technique depended on the length of venous involvement. Forty-two and 34 patients underwent SMPVR with primary anastomosis and SMPVR with PTFE interposition grafts, respectively. The postoperative morbidity, mortality, and patency were compared. For the patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (n?=?65), survival was compared between the SMPVR with primary anastomosis (n?=?36) and SMPVR with PTFE interposition graft groups (n?=?29).

Results

Patients undergoing SMPVR with PTFE grafts had larger tumor sizes (3.4?±?0.9 cm, 2.9?±?0.9 cm, P?=?0.016), longer operative durations (492.9?±?107.5 min, 408.8?±?78.8 min, P?<?0.001), and greater blood loss (986.8?±?884.5 ml, 616.7?±?485.5 ml, P?=?0.040) compared to those undergoing SMPVR with primary anastomosis. However, 30-day postoperative morbidity and mortality did not differ (29.4 and 2.9 %, respectively, for PTFE grafts and 33.3 and 7.1 %, respectively, for primary anastomosis). There were no cases of graft infection. The estimated cumulative patency of SMPVR 6 and 12 months after surgery did not differ (87.9 and 83.5 % after PTFE grafts, respectively, and 94.4 and 86.4 % after primary anastomosis, respectively). For patients who underwent surgery for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, there were no significant differences in the median survival time (11 vs. 12 months) or the 1-, 2-, and 3-year survival rates (35.7, 12.5, and 4.2 vs. 36.4, 17.3, and 8.7 %, respectively) for the PTFE and primary anastomosis groups.

Conclusions

PTFE grafts could provide a safe and effective option for venous reconstruction after PD in patients with segmental vein resection.     

Infragenicular Bypass Graft for Limb Salvage Using Polytetrafluoroethylene and Distal Vein Cuff as the First Alternative in Patients Without Ipsilateral Greater Saphenous Vein

The objectives of this study were to evaluate the results of polytetrafluoroethylene infragenicular bypass grafts with a distal interposition vein cuff in patients with critical limb ischemia in the absence of ipsilateral greater saphenous vein. From January 1997 to June 2002, 58 consecutive below-knee bypass grafts with PTFE and distal interposition vein cuff were performed in 57 patients with a median age of 70.8 years. The distal anastomosis was located at the infragenicular popliteal artery in 18 cases and at tibial vessels in 40. Primary patency, secondary patency, and limb salvage were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. During a median follow-up of 14.4 months (range, 1-50) 26 cases of graft occlusion and 19 major amputations were registered. The primary and secondary patency rates at 12, 24, and 36 months were 57%, 54%, and 47% and 61%, 58%, and 50%, respectively. Limb salvage rates reached 69%, 69%, and 59% at 12, 24, and 36 months. When below-knee revasculanzation is required in patients with limb-threatening ischemia, in the absence ipsilateral greater saphenous vein, PTFE grafts with a distal vein cuff are a reasonable substitute with acceptable long-term patency and limb salvage rates.     

Civilian vascular trauma of the upper extremity

One hundred forty-three patients with 163 upper extremity vascular injuries were reviewed. Penetrating trauma accounted for 94% of the injuries and blunt trauma for 6%. Absent pulses are not a completely reliable sign of upper extremity arterial injury. The most frequently injured upper extremity vessel is the brachial artery, followed in decreasing frequency by ulnar, radial, and axillary arterial injuries and axillary venous injuries. The most common technique of vascular repair was end-to-end anastomosis, followed by vein graft interposition. No amputations were required. Despite excellent results of vascular reconstruction, functional impairment due to associated nerve injuries was a distressingly predominant finding.     

The merit of polytetrafluoroethylene extensions and interposition grafts to salvage failing infrainguinal vein bypasses

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the merit of polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) extensions and interpositions for the management of failing infrainguinal vein bypass grafts.Methods: The treatment of 133 failing vein grafts in 125 patients over a 10-year period was retrospectively reviewed. Twenty-two graft-threatening lesions were detected in patients who did not have a usable autogenous vein conduit as determined by preoperative and intraoperative evaluations. A PTFE extension or interposition graft was used for the necessary reconstruction in all cases.Results: Ten lesions were within the vein graft, 11 were proximal to the graft in the femoral or popliteal artery segments, and one was distal to the graft in the popliteal artery. The treatment of these lesions included 19 extensions and three mid graft interpositions. The vein graft lesions developed significantly sooner (mean 10.6 ± 2.5 months) after the bypass ( p < 0.05) than the arterial lesions (mean 28.0 ± 6.1 months). The 3-year cumulative secondary patency rate for these vein grafts treated with PTFE extensions or interpositions was 84% ± 8%. This was not significantly different from the 3-year cumulative secondary patency rate for vein grafts treated with vein extensions or interpositions at our institution over the same time period (82% ± 10%). The 3-year limb salvage rates were 95% and 89%, respectively.Conclusions: These results indicate that PTFE extensions and interpositions can be used successfully to maintain the patency of failing vein grafts and may serve to prolong limb salvage in patients without any usable autogenous vein. Early reintervention with a PTFE conduit in this difficult group of patients is appropriate to salvage a failing vein graft. (J VASC SURG 1996;23:329-35.)     

PTFE Bypass or Thrupass for Superficial Femoral Artery Occlusion? A Randomised Controlled Trial

Early results of a thrupass endograft in the treatment of femoral lesions are promising. Less morbidity and better cost-effectiveness are suggested to be achieved in the treatment of chronic lower limb ischaemia with endovascular treatment compared to surgical treatment.Patients and methodsThis randomised multicentre trial aimed to enroll a group of 60 + 60 patients for the treatment of 5–25-cm occlusions of superficial femoral artery (SFA) to be followed up for 3 years. Patients were treated either with endoluminal PTFE thrupass (WL Gore & Ass) or with surgical polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) bypass to proximal popliteal artery. Primary patency at 3 years was scheduled to be the primary end-point and secondary patency, functional success, costs and quality of life the secondary end-points.ResultsA sample of 100 consecutive SFA occlusions in one of the centres revealed that only 4% of the lesions were amenable for the study. The trial was prematurely terminated due to the results of an interim analysis at the time when 44 patients were recruited: the 1-year primary patency (excluding technical failures) was 48% for thrupass and 95% for bypass (p = 0.02). The patency difference in favour of surgical bypass over endovascular thrupass was also sustained after completion of 1-year follow-up, the primary patencies being 46% and 84% at 1 year with grossly equilinear life-table curves thereafter (p = 0.18), respectively. The corresponding secondary patencies were 63% and 100% (p = 0.05) when excluding technical failures and 58% and 100% (p = 0.02) according to intention-to-treat analysis. Secondary outcomes were thus not analysed.ConclusionTreatment of SFA occlusions (TASC IIB and C or Imelda Ia and II) should be done by PTFE bypass rather than by PTFE thrupass, as thrupass is connected with worse early outcome. These results represent only a small category of femoral disease.     

Vascular injuries in the extremities in battle casualties

A serial of 51 wounded soldiers with 54 arterial and 28 venous injuries is presented. Interposition of autogenous vein grafts was performed in 30 arterial injuries. Lateral suture or patch arterioplasty was performed in 7 arteries. End-to-end anastomosis was possible in 8 cases. Primary vein repair was performed in 14 vein injuries. Lateral suture, patch plasty, end-to-end anastomosis and interposition composite vein grafts were used. A distal temporary arteriovenous fistula to increase the flow through venous interposition grafts was performed in 4 cases. Hyperbaric oxygen treatment was used in 7 cases in which successful arterial repair did not reverse ischaemia, and it prevented major amputations. Neurovascular injuries are not always an indication for primary amputation. Six such cases are discussed.     

A retrospective analysis of infra-inguinal arterial reconstruction: three year patency rates.

Primary infra-inguinal arterial reconstructions were reviewed for primary patency and outcome of thrombosis in 144 patients. Distal anastomoses in these patients were to the popliteal artery and were above the knee in 63, below the knee in 53 and at the tibial level in 28. The treatment used was: polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) in 33 cases, PTFE with an interposition vein cuff in 29 cases, autogenous saphenous vein (ASV) in situ in 47 cases, and reversed technique in 26 cases. Life table analysis showed a 59% overall primary patency at 3 years. Patency rates of above knee anastomoses (65%) and below knee (61%) were statistically different from the tibial anastomoses (42%, P = 0.005). In both above and below knee popliteal anastomoses there was a statistically significant difference in the patency of ASV and the PTFE/vein cuff technique (P = 0.0006) but there was no difference between ASV and PTFE. There was no difference in patency rates for the various types of grafts with tibial anastomoses. Data were analysed at 3 years, taking into account the variables of smoking, diabetes or indications for surgery respectively and no difference was found in patency. The number and calibre of the run-off vessels did not influence patency significantly, hence anastomosis to any good quality vessel regardless of run-off is recommended. The poor results with the interposition vein cuff technique are unexplained but this study suggests that the technique should be reserved for anastomoses below the popliteal artery.