Surveying Fourth-Year Medical Students Regarding the Choice of Diagnostic Radiology as a Specialty

PurposeThe aim of this study was to survey fourth-year medical students, both those choosing and those not choosing diagnostic radiology as their specialty, regarding factors influencing their choice of specialty and their perceptions of radiology.MethodsA voluntary anonymous online survey hyperlink was sent to 141 US medical schools for distribution to fourth-year students. Topics included demographics, radiology education, specialty choice and influencing factors, and opinions of radiology.ResultsA representative sampling (7%) of 2015 fourth-year medical students (n = 1,219; 51% men, 49% women) participated: 7% were applying in radiology and 93% were not. For respondents applying in radiology, the most important factor was intellectual challenge. For respondents applying in nonradiology specialties, degree of patient contact was the most important factor in the decision not to choose radiology; job market was not listed as a top-three factor. Women were less likely than men to apply in radiology (P < .001), with radiology selected by 11.8% of men (56 of 476) and only 2.8% of women (13 of 459). Respondents self-identifying as Asian had a significantly higher (P = .015) likelihood of selecting radiology (19 of 156 [12.2%]) than all other races combined (44 of 723 [6.1%]). Respondents at medical schools with required dedicated medical imaging rotations were more likely to choose radiology as a specialty, but most schools still do not require the clerkship (82%).ConclusionsThe reasons fourth-year medical students choose, or do not choose, diagnostic radiology as a specialty are multifactorial, but noncontrollable factors, such as the job market, proved less compelling than controllable factors, such as taking a radiology rotation.     

Predictors Between the Subcomponents of Burnout Among Radiology Trainees

ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to investigate the effect of various predictors on burnout among radiology residents during their training.MethodsIn this cross-sectional analysis, we distributed the Maslach Burnout Index for Medical Personnel (MBI-HSS [MP]) to eligible United States (US) radiology residents. Covariates of interest included age, child status, debt burden, partner status, and self-identified gender. Primary outcomes include MBI-HSS (MP) subcomponent scores – emotional exhaustion (EE), depersonalization (DP), and personal accomplishment (PA). Mann-Whitney tests were used to compare averages between groups.ResultsOut of the 770 of 2823 residents (27.3%) who responded, 488 of 770 completed the MBI-HSS (MP). During the R1 year, male sex was associated with marginally higher PA scores (36.5 versus 33.5; P = .029). Having children or a partner was associated with lower EE scores (18.7 versus 26.8, P = .012; 22 versus 28.9, P = .022, respectively) and higher PA scores (37 vs 32.7, P = .024; 35 versus 31.3, P = .039, respectively) among the R3 cohort. Reporting debt < $200,000 was associated with lower EE scores among the R3 (21.2 versus 27.3, P = .028) and R4 (16.4 versus 21.9, P = .033) cohort.DiscussionThere are several predictors of burnout that transiently impact residents at different years of training and primarily impact EE or PA, but not DP scores. R3 residents' scores are most sensitive to these covariates.     

A Survey of Interventional Radiology Awareness Among Final-Year Medical Students in a European Country

Interventional radiology (IR) is a rapidly expanding specialty that is facing the challenges of turf wars and personnel shortages. Appropriate exposure of medical students to this field can be vital to recruitment of potential future trainees or referring physicians. The aim of this study was to determine the knowledge and views of final-year medical students in a single EU country regarding various aspects of IR. An electronic survey was sent via e-mail to all final-year medical students in a European country. The students were given a month to respond to the questionnaire. A total of 234 students of 675 (34.5%) replied to the survey. Of the respondents, 35% had previously completed an attachment to the radiology department. The majority of students (63%) thought their knowledge in radiology in general was poor. The percentage of students who correctly identified procedures performed by interventional radiologists was 69% for Hickman line insertion, 79% for fibroid embolization, and 67.5% for lower limb angioplasty. Sixty percent, 30%, and 47% thought that interventional radiologists perform cardiac angioplasties, perform arterial bypasses, and create AV fistulas, respectively. Forty-nine percent felt that interventional radiologists are surgically trained. Eighty-three percent of students were first made aware of angioplasty by a cardiologist. Thirty-one percent thought that interventional radiologists do ward rounds, 24% thought that interventional radiologists have admitting rights, and 26% felt that interventional radiologists run an outpatient practice. A significant number of students (76%) thought that the job prospects in IR are good or excellent but only 40.5% were willing to consider a career in IR. In conclusion, this study indicates that IR remains a nascent but attractive specialty to the majority of medical students. Further development of the existing informal undergraduate curriculum to address shortcomings will ensure that IR continues to attract the brightest talents to the field.     

Hidden Curriculum and the Demographic Stoicism That Keeps Women and Minorities Away From Radiology: A Mixed-Methods Study of Medical Students

ObjectiveTo understand how women and historically underrepresented minority medical students perceive radiology as a potential career choice.MethodsMedical students representing a broad spectrum of radiology exposure from a single institution were invited to participate in a mixed-methods study. Participants completed a 16-item survey about demographics and perceptions of radiology. Ten focus groups were administered to probe decision making regarding career selection. The themes influencing women and historically underrepresented minority students are presented.ResultsForty-nine medical students, including 29 (59%) women and 17 (35%) underrepresented minorities, participated. Most participants (28 of 48, 58%) reported men outnumbered women in radiology. Female participants reported a lack of mentorship and role models as major concerns. Outreach efforts focused on the family-friendly nature of radiology were viewed as patronizing. Demographic improvements in the field were viewed as very slow. Forty-six percent (22 of 48) of participants indicated that radiology had a less underrepresented racial or ethnic workforce than other medical specialties. Minority participants especially noted a lack of radiology presence in mainstream media, so students have few preconceived biases. A failure to organically connect with the mostly White male radiologists because of a lack of shared background was a major barrier. Finally, participants described a hidden curriculum that pushes minority medical students away from specialty fields like radiology and toward primary care fields to address underserved communities and health care disparities.DiscussionWomen and historically underrepresented minority medical students perceive major barriers to choosing a career in radiology. Radiology departments must develop sophisticated multilevel approaches to improve diversity.     

Demographic Trends in Female Interventional Radiology Trainees With the Advent of the Integrated Interventional Radiology Residency

ObjectiveExamine changes in gender representation in the interventional radiology (IR) training pool since the advent of the integrated IR residency in 2015 to 2020.MethodsElectronic Residency Application Service and ACGME Data Resource Book records from 2015 to 2020 were reviewed for integrated IR residency and vascular and interventional radiology (VIR) fellowship applicant data and active IR resident and VIR fellow data, respectively. The Society of Interventional Radiology (SIR) 2018 registry data were reviewed for SIR membership data. Two-tailed Fisher’s exact tests and χ² analyses were used to compare trainees between application cycles.ResultsIn the 2017 application cycle, 23% (247 of 1,062) of integrated IR residency applicants were female, with similar interest in the 2018, 2019, and 2020 cycles (χ²[3, n = 2,863] = 5.1, P = .17). In comparison, female VIR fellowship applicants were 12% from 2017 to 2020. Female integrated IR residents represented 13% to 18% of all integrated IR residents in the 2016 to 2020 academic years compared with the period before the integrated IR residency when female IR trainees represented 8% (23 of 275) of all IR trainees in 2015 to 2016 (P = .0002). Although in 2018, the total active SIR female membership was 9% (319 of 3,622), the female resident membership was 17% (131 of 793), and the female medical student membership was 25% (389 of 1,573).DiscussionWith the advent of the integrated IR residency, there is an increasing female constituency, at the medical student, IR applicant, and IR resident levels, with more than a doubling of female IR trainees, portending a continued reduction in the IR gender disparity in the future.     

Relative Prevalence and Characteristics of Malpractice Litigation Involving Radiology Trainees

PurposeTo assess the prevalence and characteristics of medical malpractice litigation involving radiology trainees.MethodsUsing a LexisNexis legal database keyword search, we identified all state and federal lawsuits between 2009 and 2018 yielding formal appellate and lower court opinions (precedent setting “complex litigation”) potentially involving physician trainees. Available judicial records were systematically reviewed to identify malpractice matters with material trainee involvement. Cases were categorized by criteria including specialty and location. Incidence rates were calculated for all specialties. Radiology lawsuits were characterized further.ResultsInitial LexisNexis Boolean database search yielded 8,935 potentially relevant cases with 580 confirmed as malpractice materially involving physician trainees. Annual cases trended downward (high 70, low 37). Most originated in New York (195 of 580; 33.6%), Ohio (41; 7.1%), and Pennsylvania (34; 5.9%) and involved surgery (204; 35.2%), obstetrics and gynecology (114; 19.7%), and medicine (105; 18.1%). The case incidence rate for all trainees was 0.63 per 1,000 trainee years. Of 309 cases with known outcomes, defendant physicians prevailed in 238 (77.0%). Radiology trainees represented only 23 cases (4.0%), corresponding to an incidence rate ratio of 0.79 (confidence interval 0.52-1.20). Radiology litigation most frequently involved alleged missed diagnoses (14 of 23; 60.8%) and procedural complications (7; 30.4%). Defendant radiologists prevailed in 9 of the 13 cases with known outcomes (69.2%).ConclusionComplex medical malpractice litigation involving physician trainees is infrequent and decreasing over time. Lawsuits involving radiology trainees are uncommon, less likely than for many nonradiology trainees, and typically involve alleged missed diagnoses or procedural complications. Defendant radiologists usually prevail.     

Predictors of Self-Reported Burnout Among Radiology Faculty at a Large Academic Medical Center

ObjectiveDetermine predictors of self-reported burnout among academic radiologists.MethodsIn 2017, radiologists at an urban medical center completed the Stanford Wellness Survey, rating burnout via Likert scale (0: no burnout; 1: occasional stress, no burnout; 2: one or more burnout symptoms; 3: persistent burnout symptoms; 4: completely burned out). Univariate analyses assessed age, gender, family situation, clinical versus research focus, and academic rank for association with burnout (Likert scale ≥ 2). Responses in 11 domains querying definitions of burnout (professional fulfillment, emotional exhaustion, interpersonal disengagement), individual factors (sleep-related impairment, self-compassion, negative work impact on personal relationships), institutional factors (perceived appreciation, control over schedule, organizational or personal values alignment, electronic health record experience, supervisor’s leadership quality) were evaluated for association with burnout, using χ² and logistic regression to calculate odds ratios (ORs).ResultsIn 159 of 204 (77.9%) completed radiologist surveys, 35.2% (56 of 159) reported burnout. Age < 40 years (P = .0068) and clinical focus (P = .0111) were significantly associated with burnout. In univariate analysis, all domains except electronic health record were statistically significant: emotional exhaustion (OR = 1.93, P < .0001); professional fulfillment (OR = 0.78, P < .0001); self-compassion (OR = 1.36, P < .0001); perceived appreciation (OR = 0.78, P < .0001); sleep-related impairment (OR = 1.20, P < .0001); supervisor’s leadership quality (OR = 0.91, P < .0001); interpersonal disengagement (OR = 1.31, P < .0001); organizational or personal values alignment (OR = 0.87, P = .0004); negative work impact on personal relationships (OR = 1.10, P = .0070); control over schedule (OR = 0.80, P = .0054); electronic health record experience (OR=1.03, P = .5392).DiscussionNearly all questions significantly predicted self-reported burnout, observed in over one-third of academic radiologists. Younger age and clinical focus were associated with burnout. Initiatives targeting individual factors (eg, sleep impairment, self-compassion) and institutional factors (eg, physician appreciation, leadership-faculty interactions) may reduce burnout.     

Prevalence of Burnout Among Canadian Radiologists and Radiology Trainees

Purpose

Physician burnout is on the rise compared to the average population, and radiology burnout rates are ranked high compared to other specialties. We aim to assess radiologist and radiology trainee burnout in Canada.

The State of Medical Student Teaching of Interventional Radiology: Implications for the Future

IntroductionThe formation of integrated interventional radiology (IR) residency programs has changed the training paradigm. This change mandates the need to provide adequate exposure to allow students to explore IR as a career option and to allow programs to sufficiently evaluate students. This study aims to highlight the availability of medical student education in IR and proposes a basic framework for clinical rotations.Materials and MethodsThe Liaison Committee on Medical Education (LCME) website was utilized to generate a list of accredited medical schools in the United States. School websites and course listings were searched for availability of IR and diagnostic radiology rotations. The curricula of several well-established IR rotations were examined to identify and categorize course content.ResultsIn all, 140 LCME-accredited medical schools had course information available. Of those schools, 70.5% offered an IR rotation; 84.6% were only available to senior medical students and only 2% were offered for preclinical students; and 8.1% of courses were listed as subinternships. Well-established IR clerkships included a variety of clinical settings, including preprocedure evaluation, experience performing procedures, postprocedure management, and discharge planning.ConclusionMedical student exposure to IR is crucial to the success of integrated IR residency programs. Current research shows few institutions with formal IR subinternship rotations. Although 70.5% of institutions have some form of nonstandardized IR course, 84.6% are available only to fourth-year students, and 2% are offered to preclinical students. This suggests there is a significant opportunity for additional formal exposure to IR through increasing availability of IR rotations and exposure during the clinical and preclinical years.     

Multidisciplinary Approach in Teaching Diagnostic Radiology to Medical Students: The Development,Implementation, and Evaluation of a Virtual Educational Model

PurposeThe aim of this study was to develop, implement, and evaluate the effectiveness of an online multidisciplinary approach for teaching diagnostic radiology to medical students.MethodsAn online 10-session case-based learning course was designed and taught by a multidisciplinary team of radiologists, surgeons, and internists. Session topics included common clinical case scenarios for different systems and were hosted on a videoconferencing platform. Students from six medical schools across Texas enrolled in the course. The effectiveness of each session was evaluated using a pretest-posttest design. Students completed a final survey after the course to evaluate their experience.ResultsAn average of 108 attended the live sessions, with attendance peaking at 220. On average, 75 students completed both the pretest and posttest of each session. Posttest scores were an average of 46% higher than pretest scores. A total of 109 students completed the final survey; more than 90% of participants agreed that the program was relevant, that its multidisciplinary approach was valuable, and that it increased their knowledge of imaging as a diagnostic tool. Seventy-four percent said that the program increased their interest in radiology. Almost all participants said that the topics presented were thought to be “excellent and clinically important to learn” by most of the students (70%). Participants reported increased confidence in basic radiology skills after completion of the program.ConclusionsAn online multidisciplinary approach can be feasibly implemented to address the radiology education needs of a large number of medical students across a group of medical schools.     

Gender-Specific Factors Influencing Medical Students' Career Choice of IR

The authors conducted an anonymous survey to assess positive and negative factors that may affect medical students’ decisions to pursue a career in interventional radiology (IR). The survey was sent to registrants for the Midwest IR Student Symposium in 2016 and/or 2017, with a response rate of 13%; male and female responses were then compared. Female and male medical students shared similar rankings of factors affecting their decisions about choosing IR as a career, such as concern about lifestyle and excitement about therapeutic applications. Access to female IR mentors and diversification of the currently male-dominated workplace were important, gender-specific concerns.     

Limitations Influencing Interventional Radiology in Canada: Results of a National Survey by the Canadian Interventional Radiology Association (CIRA)

Purpose To describe the current state and limitations to interventional radiology (IR) in Canada through a large, national survey of Canadian interventional radiologists. Methods An anonymous online survey was offered to members of the Canadian Interventional Radiology Association (CIRA). Only staff radiologists were invited to participate. Results Seventy-five (75) responses were received from a total of 247, giving a response rate of 30%. Respondents were split approximately equally between academic centers (47%) and community practice (53%), and the majority of interventional radiologists worked in hospitals with either 200–500 (49%) or 500–1,000 (39%) beds. Procedures listed by respondents as most commonly performed in their practice included PICC line insertion (83%), angiography and stenting (65%), and percutaneous biopsy (37%). Procedures listed as not currently performed but which interventional radiologists believed would benefit their patient population included radiofrequency ablation (36%), carotid stenting (34%), and aortic stenting (21%); the majority of respondents noted that a lack of support from referring services was the main reason for not performing these procedures (56%). Impediments to increasing scope and volume of practice in Canadian IR were most commonly related to room or equipment shortage (35%), radiologist shortage (33%), and a lack of funding or administrative support (28%). Conclusion Interventional radiology in Canada is limited by a number of factors including funding, manpower, and referral support. A concerted effort should be undertaken by individual interventional radiologists and IR organizations to increase training capacity, funding, remuneration, and public exposure to IR in order to help advance the subspecialty.     

Considerations in Specialty Selections: What Medical Students Think,Know, and Think They Know about Interventional Radiology

PurposeTo compare the motivation, deterrents, knowledge, exposure, and other specialty considerations of first- to fourth-year medical students interested in interventional radiology (IR) with those who are not.Materials and MethodsMatriculants of 5 medical schools varying by region, public/private, class size, and National Institutes of Health research ranking received a 19-question survey with questions about demographics, specialty interests, motivations/deterrents, knowledge, and exposure to IR.ResultsA total of 25.8% (611/2370) of students completed the survey, of which 20.5% (125/611) expressed interest in IR, and 25% (47/186), 26% (40/153), 24% (34/143), and 3% (3/117) of first-year, second-year, third-year, and fourth-year medical students, respectively, were seriously considering IR. Those interested in IR were less motivated by direct patient care (mean, 2.8/5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.6–3.0) and longitudinal patient care (mean, 1.6/5; 95% CI, 1.4–1.7) (both, P < .01) and more motivated by salary (2.6/5; 95% CI, 2.3–2.9), job market (2.8/5; 95% CI, 2.6–2.9), and procedures (3.1/5; 95% CI, 2.8–3.4) compared with their peers (all P < .05). Those interested in IR were more certain about their IR knowledge (mean range, 1.6–2.0/3.0; 95% CI, 1.3–2.3) than their peers (mean range, 1.9–2.4/3.0; 95% CI, 1.6–2.1, in which 0 = certain, P ≤ .01); however, both groups scored low in actual knowledge (those considering IR: 35.0–73.2% correct; 95% CI, 23.5–81.4; those who were not: 26.6–66.7% correct; 95% CI, 24.3–75.9, P > .05).ConclusionsAlthough medical students showed interest in IR, they had a limited understanding of IR. IR educators may increase IR interest and understanding among medical students by clarifying the procedural aspects and longitudinal care present in a comprehensive IR practice.