Antibiotic strategies and clinical outcomes in critically ill patients with pneumonia caused by carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii

ObjectivesThis study aimed to investigate antibiotic prescribing patterns and effectiveness of different anti-carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) strategies for CRAB pneumonia.MethodsWe conducted a multicentre, retrospective study in three hospitals. During 2010–2015, adult ICU patients with CRAB pneumonia treated with at least one antimicrobial agent covering the CRAB isolate in vitro for more than 2 days were included. We used multivariate logistic regression to analyse the associations of anti-CRAB strategies with ICU mortality and other clinical outcomes.ResultsAmong 238 patients with CRAB pneumonia, tigecycline monotherapy (84, 35.3%) was the most common antibiotic strategy, followed by tigecycline with colistin (43, 18.1%), colistin monotherapy (34, 14.3%), colistin combination without tigecycline (33, 13.9%), tigecycline combination without colistin (32, 13.4%), and sulbactam-based therapy without tigecycline and colistin (12, 5.0%). In multivariate analysis, tigecycline-based therapy was associated with higher ICU mortality than non-tigecycline therapy (adjusted OR 2.30, 95% CI 1.19–4.46). There was no difference between colistin-based therapy and non-colistin therapy. Compared with tigecycline monotherapy, colistin monotherapy was associated with lower ICU mortality (aOR 0.30, 95% CI 0.10–0.88). Treatment failure analyses showed similar trends. Tigecycline-based therapy was associated with higher treatment failure rate than non-tigecycline therapy (aOR 2.51, 95% CI 1.39–4.54), whereas colistin-based therapy was associated with lower treatment failure rate than non-colistin-based therapy (aOR 0.48, 95% CI 0.27–0.86).ConclusionsTigecycline was commonly prescribed for CRAB pneumonia. However, tigecycline-based therapy was associated with higher ICU mortality and treatment failure. Our study suggests that colistin monotherapy may be a better antibiotic strategy for CRAB pneumonia.     

Colistin plus meropenem for carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative infections: in vitro synergism is not associated with better clinical outcomes

ObjectivesIn vitro models showing synergism between polymyxins and carbapenems support combination treatment for carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative (CRGN) infections. We tested the association between the presence of in vitro synergism and clinical outcomes in patients treated with colistin plus meropenem.MethodsThis was a secondary analysis of AIDA, a randomized controlled trial comparing colistin with colistin–meropenem for severe CRGN infections. We tested in vitro synergism using a checkerboard assay. Based on the fractional inhibitory concentration (ΣFIC) index for each colistin–meropenem combination, we categorized results as synergistic, antagonistic or additive/indifferent. The primary outcome was clinical failure at 14 days. Secondary outcomes were 14- and 28-day mortality and microbiological failure.ResultsThe sample included 171 patients with infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (n = 131), Enterobacteriaceae (n = 37) and Pseudomonas aeuruginosa (n = 3). In vitro testing showed synergism for 73 isolates, antagonism for 20 and additivism/indifference for 78. In patients who received any colistin plus meropenem, clinical failure at 14 days was 59/78 (75.6%) in the additivism/indifference group (reference category), 54/73 (74.0%) in the synergism group (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.76, 95% CI 0.31–1.83), and 11/20 (55%) in the antagonism group (aOR 0.77, 95% CI 0.22–2.73). There was no significant difference between groups for any secondary outcome. Comparing the synergism group to patients treated with colistin monotherapy, synergism was not protective against 14-day clinical failure (aOR 0.52, 95% CI 0.26–1.04) or 14-day mortality (aOR1.09, 95% CI 0.60–1.96).DiscussionIn vitro synergism between colistin and meropenem via checkerboard method did not translate into clinical benefit.     

<Emphasis Type="Italic">Acinetobacter baumannii</Emphasis> bacteraemia in patients with haematological malignancy: a multicentre retrospective study from the Infection Working Party of Jiangsu Society of Hematology

Acinetobacter baumannii (Ab) bacteraemia in patients with haematological malignancies is fatal but rarely reported. We explored the clinical characteristics, drug resistances and prognostic factors in these patients. This multicentre, retrospective study was conducted at the department of haematology wards of 18 tertiary hospitals in China from January 2014 to June 2015. The total clinical isolates from every source were collected from patients with haematological malignancy. Haematological malignancy patients diagnosed with Ab bacteraemia were analysed. During the study period, 40 patients with Ab bacteraemia were identified, accounting for 2.9% (40/1358) of bacteraemia cases, of which 25 (62.5%) had acute leukaemia (AL) and 27 (67.5%) had neutropaenia. Compared with non-neutropaenic patients, neutropaenic patients showed higher Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) scores and 30-day mortality rates (p?<?0.05). The in vitro antibiotic susceptibility of Ab to colistin was highest, at 100%, followed by that of tigecycline (91.30%) and amikacin (75.86%). Compared with the patients who had carbapenem-susceptible Ab infections, patients infected with carbapenem-resistant Ab (CRAB) had significantly longer hospital stays and were more likely to have had exposure to carbapenem before bacteraemia (p?<?0.05). The 30-day mortality rate was 32.5%. CRAB, neutropaenia, higher APACHE score, Pitt bacteraemia score and inappropriate initial antimicrobial therapy were significantly associated with 30-day mortality. Multivariable analysis showed that APACHE score and CRAB were independent predictors of 30-day mortality. Haematologic patients with AL and febrile neutropaenia were at high risk of Ab bacteraemia. More attention should be paid to CRAB, which is an independent risk factor for mortality in haematological malignancy patients with Ab bacteraemia.     

In vitro Activity of Colistin in Combination with Tigecycline against Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii Strains Isolated from Patients with Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia

Objective: This study investigated the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values and in vitro activity of colistin in combination with tigecycline against carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii strains isolated from patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) using the E-test method.Methods: A total of 40 A. baumannii strains, identified using the Phoenix Automated Microbiology System (Becton, Dickinson and Co., Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) by conventional methods, were included in this study. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis was performed to examine the clonal relationships between isolates. The carbapenem resistance of the strains to colistin and tigecycline was assessed using the E-test method (Liofilchem, Roseto Degli Abruzzi, Italy). The in vitro activity of colistin in combination with tigecycline was evaluated using the fractional inhibitor concentration (FIC) index.Results: While only 1 of 40 A. baumannii strains was determined to be colistin resistant, 6 were tigecycline resistant. The MIC₅₀, MIC₉₀, and MIC intervals of the A. baumannii strains were 0.19, 1.5, and 0.064‒4 μg/ml for colistin and 1, 8, and 0.094‒256 μg/ml for tigecycline, respectively. No synergistic effect was observed using the FIC index; 8 strains exhibited an indifferent effect and 32 exhibited an antagonist effect. Three of the six strains that were resistant to tigecycline were indifferent; the remaining three were antagonistic. The colistin-resistant strain also exhibited an antagonist effect.Conclusion: In contrast to their synergistic effect against carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii isolates, colistin and tigecycline were highly antagonistic to carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii strains isolated from patients with VAP when the drugs were administered together. Therefore, alternative treatment options should be used during the treatment of VAP attributed to A. baumannii.     

Efficacy of adjunctive nebulized colistin in critically ill patients with nosocomial carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacterial pneumonia: a multi-centre observational study

ObjectivesTo investigate the association between adjunctive nebulized colistin and treatment outcomes in critically ill patients with nosocomial carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacterial (CR-GNB) pneumonia.MethodsThis retrospective, multi-centre, cohort study included individuals admitted to the intensive care unit with nosocomial pneumonia caused by colistin-susceptible CR-GNB. Enrolled patients were divided into groups with/without nebulized colistin as adjunct to at least one effective intravenous antibiotic. Propensity score matching was performed in the original cohort (model 1) and a time-window bias-adjusted cohort (model 2). The association between adjunctive nebulized colistin and treatment outcomes was analysed.ResultsIn total, 181 and 326 patients treated with and without nebulized colistin, respectively, were enrolled for analysis. The day 14 clinical failure rate and mortality rate were 41.4% (75/181) versus 46% (150/326), and 14.9% (27/181) versus 21.8% (71/326), respectively. In the propensity score-matching analysis, patients with nebulized colistin had lower day 14 clinical failure rates (model 1: 41% (68/166) versus 54.2% (90/166), p 0.016; model 2: 35.3% (41/116) versus 56.9% (66/116), p 0.001). On multivariate analysis, nebulized colistin was an independent factor associated with fewer day 14 clinical failures (model 1: adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.59, 95% CI 0.37–0.92; model 2: aOR 0.37, 95% CI 0.21–0.65). Nebulized colistin was not associated independently with a lower 14-day mortality rate in the time-dependent analysis in both models 1 and 2.ConclusionsAdjunctive nebulized colistin was associated with lower day 14 clinical failure rate, but not lower 14-day mortality rate, in critically ill patients with nosocomial pneumonia caused by colistin-susceptible CR-GNB.     

Treatment outcome of non-carbapenemase-producing carbapenem-resistant <Emphasis Type="Italic">Klebsiella pneumoniae</Emphasis> infections: a multicenter study in Taiwan

Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) infections are associated with high mortality, and experiences with its treatment are usually based on carbapenemase-producing strains. Non-carbapenemase-producing CRKP is of clinical significance, but relevant studies are lacking. This nationwide study aimed to evaluate the outcome of antimicrobial therapy in patients with non-carbapenemase-producing CRKP infections. Patients with non-carbapenemase-producing CRKP infections were enrolled from 16 hospitals during January 2013 to December 2014 in Taiwan. Carbapenem resistance was defined as reduced susceptibility with a minimum inhibitory concentration of ≥2 mg/L for imipenem or meropenem. The resistance mechanisms of CRKP isolates were analyzed, and the clinical data of these patients were collected retrospectively. Independent risk factors of 14-day morality were determined by Cox regression analysis. A total of 99 patients with non-carbapenemase-producing CRKP infections were enrolled, and 14-day mortality was 27.3%. Among 67 patients treated with appropriate antimicrobial therapy, most (n?=?61) patients received monotherapy. The 14-day mortality was lower in patients treated with appropriate monotherapy (21.3%) than in those with inappropriate therapy (37.5%). The multivariate regression model identified monotherapy (hazard ratio [HR], 0.30; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.13–0.71; P?=?0.005) as protective factor, and APACHE II scores (HR, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.01–1.18; P?=?0.022) as risk factor associated with 14-day mortality. Tigecycline, colistin, and carbapenem were the most commonly used drugs in monotherapy. This study provides evidence supporting the efficacy of monotherapy in the treatment of non-carbapenemase-producing CRKP infections, and provides a future target for antibiotics stewardship for CRKP infection.     

A case-control study to identify predictors of 14-day mortality following carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii bacteraemia

Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) is an increasingly common nosocomial pathogen. We sought to identify clinical and microbiological predictors of 14-day mortality among patients with CRAB bacteraemia. This case-control study included all adult patients in one Israeli hospital with CRAB on blood culture between July 2008 and June 2011. Cases were defined as patients who died within 14 days of bacteraemia onset and controls as patients who survived over 14 days. Sequence-typing of the bla_OXA-51-like gene and REP-PCR identified CRAB clone groups. Logistic regression was performed to analyze predictors of 14-day all-cause mortality. To correct for differences in treatment onset, Cox regression was used to examine the effect of receiving an active antibiotic. Eighty-three cases and 89 controls were included. Six major CRAB clone groups were identified, with 14-day mortality ranging from 17 to 66%. Independent predictors of 14-day mortality were severity of illness (OR = 1.38 for each 1-point increase in Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score; 95% CI, 1.21, 1.56), independence in activities of daily living (ADL) on admission (OR = 3.40; 95% CI, 1.20, 9.67, for fully dependent vs. independent), surgery before bacteraemia (OR = 0.25; 95% CI, 0.11, 0.59) and clone group (OR = 7.76; 95% CI, 2.52, 23.85, for the most virulent group vs. the reference group). In the multivariate Cox model using a propensity score to adjust for SOFA, clone, ADL and surgery, active antibiotic treatment was protective (HR = 0.30; 95% CI, 0.15, 0.60). Differences in virulence between CRAB clones may partly explain heterogeneous results in previous studies of mortality following CRAB infection.     

Predictors of clinical and microbiological treatment failure in patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteraemia: a retrospective cohort study in a region with low MRSA prevalence

Invasive infections with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) have been associated with increased morbidity and mortality. The aim of the present study was to identify independent predictors of early mortality and treatment failure in patients with MRSA bacteraemia. A total of 132 adult patients who developed MRSA bacteraemia during hospitalization in the University Hospital of Vienna between 2000 and 2011 were screened and 124 were included in a retrospective cohort study. Patient demographics, source of bacteraemia, antimicrobial treatment and microbiological characteristics were evaluated. The 28-day crude mortality was 30.6%. Predictors of early mortality identified in multivariate Cox regression analysis included higher patientage (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 1.03, 95% CI 1.01–1.06, p 0.006), pneumonia (aHR 3.86, 95% CI 1.83–8.12, p <0.001) and failure to use MRSA active treatment (aHR 8.77, 95% CI 3.50–21.93, p <0.001). Ninety-one (73.4%) patients received glycopeptides as specific MRSA treatment. Of 63 patients treated with vancomycin, only 14 (22.6%) patients had aimed trough levels of 15–20 mg/L. Vancomycin MIC ≥ 2 mg/L was detected in 28.2% and was associated with glycopeptide pretreatment (p 0.001). All MRSA isolates were susceptible to linezolid and tigecycline. Persistent bacteraemia ≥ 7 days was documented in 25 (20.2%) patients. Independent determinants for microbiological eradication failure in patients with MRSA bacteraemia included endocarditis (p <0.001) and vancomycin trough levels (p 0.014), but not vancomycin MIC. Failure of clinical and microbiological eradication of MRSA among patients with MRSA bacteraemia was associated with clinical entity rather than with bacterial traits. Pharmacokinetic parameters seem to be decisive on microbiological and clinical success.     

Colistin against colistin-only-susceptible Acinetobacter baumannii-related infections: Monotherapy or combination therapy?

Purpose: To evaluate the outcomes of the patients who were infected with colistin-only-susceptible (COS) Acinetobacter baumannii and treated with either colistin monotherapy or colistin combined therapy. Materials and Methods: This retrospective case-control study was conducted in the training and research hospital with an 800 beds between August 2008 and December 2011. The patients, who were infected with COS A. baumannii and received either colistin monotherapy or colistin combined therapy, were included into the study. Results: In total, 51 patients fulfilling study criteria were evaluated. Colistin monotherapy was found effective as much as colistin combined therapy in terms of clinical and microbiological responses in patients with ventilator associated pneumonia (VAP) and also in patients with blood stream infections. Conclusion: Although there is no randomised controlled study yet, colistin monotherapy and colistin combined therapy are likely to achieve similar treatment responses rates. Heteroresistant strains can emerge in patients who receive colistin monotherapy     

Antibiotic treatment of infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacilli: an international ESCMID cross-sectional survey among infectious diseases specialists practicing in large hospitals

ObjectivesTo explore contemporary antibiotic management of infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria in hospitals.MethodsCross-sectional, internet-based questionnaire survey. We contacted representatives of all hospitals with more than 800 acute-care hospital beds in France, Greece, Israel, Italy, Kosovo, Slovenia, Spain and selected hospitals in the USA. We asked respondents to describe the most common actual practice at their hospital regarding management of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae, Acinetobacter baumannii and Pseudomonas aeruginosa through close-ended questions.ResultsBetween January and June 2017, 115 of 141 eligible hospitals participated (overall response rate 81.6%, country-specific rates 66.7%–100%). Most were tertiary-care (99/114, 86.8%), university-affiliated (110/115, 89.1%) hospitals and most representatives were infectious disease specialists (99/115, 86.1%). Combination therapy was prescribed in 114/115 (99.1%) hospitals at least occasionally. Respondents were more likely to consider combination therapy when treating bacteraemia, pneumonia and central nervous system infections and for Enterobacteriaceae, P. aeruginosa and A. baumannii similarly. Combination of a polymyxin with a carbapenem was used in most cases, whereas combinations of a polymyxin with tigecycline, an aminoglycoside, fosfomycin or rifampicin were also common. Monotherapy was used for treatment of complicated urinary tract infections, usually with an aminoglycoside or a polymyxin. The intended goal of combination therapy was to improve the effectiveness of the treatment and to prevent development of resistance. In general, respondents shared the misconception that combination therapy is supported by strong scientific evidence.ConclusionsCombination therapy was the preferred treatment strategy for infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria among hospital representatives, even though high-quality evidence for carbapenem-based combination therapy is lacking.     

Impact of carbapenem resistance on clinical and economic outcomes among patients with Acinetobacter baumannii infection in Colombia

Acinetobacter baumannii is a major cause of healthcare-associated infection, often affecting critically ill patients. The purpose of the study was to examine the associations of carbapenem resistance with mortality, length of hospital stay and hospital costs among patients infected with A. baumannii in intensive-care units (ICUs) in Colombia. A prospective, multicentre cohort study was conducted among 165 patients with A. baumannii infection admitted to ICUs between April 2006 and April 2010. Patients with carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii had higher risk of 30-day mortality than patients with carbapenem-susceptible A. baumannii in the univariate analysis (unadjusted hazard ratio = 2.12; 95% CI 1.14–3.95; p 0.018). However, carbapenem resistance was not significantly associated with risk of mortality (adjusted hazard ratio = 1.45; 95% CI 0.74–2.87; p 0.28) after adjusting for APACHE II score and other confounding factors. We did not find a significant difference in length of stay in ICU after the onset of infection between the two groups in the multivariate analysis (adjusted mean = 13.1 days versus 10.5 days; p 0.14). The average total cost of hospitalization among patients with carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii was significantly higher than that among patients with carbapenem-susceptible A. baumannii in the multivariate analysis (adjusted cost; US$ 11 359 versus US$ 7049; p <0.001). Carbapenem resistance was not significantly associated with mortality, though we are unable to rule out an increased risk due to the limited sample size. Carbapenem resistance was associated with an additional cost of hospitalization.     

Incidence and mortality of hospital-acquired bacteraemia: a population-based cohort study applying a multi-state model approach

ObjectiveThe effect of hospital-acquired bacteraemia on mortality is sparsely investigated. We investigated the incidence and hospital-acquired bacteraemia impact on mortality.MethodsWe conducted a 13-year population-based cohort study using the North Denmark Bacteraemia Research Database and Danish health registries. The population comprised all adult patients with a hospital admission lasting ≥48 hr. We used Poisson regression to estimate trends in incidence. The 30-day mortality of hospital-acquired bacteraemia was estimated using an illness-death multistate model with recovery using the population at risk of hospital-acquired bacteraemia as reference.ResultsWe identified 3588 episodes of hospital-acquired bacteraemia in 484 264 admissions. The incidence increased proportionally by 1.02 episodes yearly (95% CI 1.01–1.03) between 2006 and 2018. Hospital-acquired bacteraemia was associated with increased mortality (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 4.32, 95% CI 3.95–4.72), especially hospital-acquired bacteraemia with unknown source (aHR 6.42 (95% CI 5.67–7.26), “thoracic incl. pneumonia” (aHR 5.89, 95% CI 3.45–10.12) and abdominal source (aHR 4.33, 95% CI 3.27–5.74). The relative impact on mortality diminished with age (aHR 5.66, 95% CI 2.00–16.01 in 18–40 years old vs. 3.69, 95% CI 3.14–4.32 in 81–105 years old) and comorbidity (aHR 5.75, 95% CI 4.45–7.42 in low vs. 3.55, 95% CI 3.16–3.98 in high comorbidity), and was higher in elective admissions (aHR 9.09, 95% CI 7.14–11.57 vs. aHR of 4.03, 95% CI 3.67–4.42).DiscussionHospital-acquired bacteraemia is associated with high mortality, especially when the source is unknown or originating from the thoracic cavity.     

Intrathecal colistin for drug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii central nervous system infection: a case series and systematic review

Treatment limitations exist for drug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii central nervous system (CNS) infection. We conducted a retrospective study and systematic literature review to identify patients with drug-resistant A. baumannii CNS infection who received primary or adjunct intrathecal or intraventricular (IT/IVT) colistin. In a case series of seven Thai patients and 17 patients identified in the literature, clinical and microbiological cure rates with IT/IVT colistin therapy were 83% and 92%, respectively. Three patients (13%) developed chemical ventriculitis and one (4%) experienced treatment-associated seizures. Death was associated with delayed IT/IVT colistin therapy compared to survival (mean time from diagnosis to IT/IVT colistin, 7 vs. 2 days; p 0.01). The only independent predictor of mortality was the severity of illness (APACHE II score > 19, adjusted odds ratio 49.5; 95% CI 1.7–1428.6; p 0.02). This case series suggests that administration of primary or adjunctive IT/IVT colistin therapy was effective for drug-resistant A. baumannii CNS infection.     

Shorter duration of antibiotic treatment for acute bacteraemic cholangitis with successful biliary drainage: a retrospective cohort study

ObjectivesTo assess the effectiveness of short duration antimicrobial therapy for acute cholangitis with bacteraemia.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with acute bacteraemic cholangitis with successful biliary duct drainage at a single centre in Japan. We compared short-course antimicrobial therapy (SCT, ≤7 days) and long-course therapy (LCT, ≥8 days), with a primary outcome of 30-day mortality. We constructed logistic regression models for mortality and a composite outcome, including mortality, recurrence, recrudescence, new bacteraemia, liver abscess or other complications related to cholangitis. We also developed a propensity score for SCT with inverse probability weighting for both the primary outcome and the composite outcome.ResultsWe identified 263 patients in our cohort; 86 (32.7%) patients received SCT and the remaining 177 (67.3%) received LCT. The median durations of SCT and LCT were 6 days (range 2–7 days) and 12 days (range 8–46 days), respectively. The 30-day mortalities of SCT and LCT were 4.7% (4/85) and 5.7% (10/176), respectively (p 1.00). Logistic regression analysis showed that the odds ratio of SCT for 30-day mortality and the composite outcome were 1.07 (95% CI 0.25–4.52, p 0.93) and 1.08 (95% CI 0.48–2.45, p 0.85), respectively. Propensity score analyses for both 30-day mortality and the composite outcome did not demonstrate a difference between SCT and LCT (p 0.65 and p 0.95, respectively).ConclusionsSCT with a median duration of 6 days did not have worse outcomes than LCT with a median duration of 12 days. Shortening the duration of antimicrobial therapy may be a reasonable option when treating acute bacteraemic cholangitis following successful biliary drainage.     

Bacteremic nosocomial pneumonia caused by Acinetobacter baumannii and Acinetobacter nosocomialis: a single or two distinct clinical entities?

The phenotypically indistinguishable Acinetobacter baumannii and Acinetobacter nosocomialis have become leading pathogens causing nosocomial pneumonia in critically ill patients. A. baumannii and A. nosocomialis nosocomial pneumonias were grouped as a single clinical entity previously. This study aimed to determine whether they are the same or a different clinical entity. A total of 121 patients with A. baumannii and 131 with A. nosocomialis bacteremic nosocomial pneumonia were included during an 8-year period. Despite the similar Charlson co-morbidity scores at admission, patients with A. baumannii pneumonia were more likely to have abnormal haematological findings, lobar pneumonia, significantly higher Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scores and higher frequency of shock at the onset of bacteraemia than those with A. nosocomialis pneumoni. A. baumannii isolates were resistant to more classes of antimicrobials, except colistin, and therefore the patients with A. baumannii pneumonia were more likely to receive inappropriate antimicrobial therapy. The 14-day mortality was significantly higher in patients with A. baumannii pneumonia (34.7% vs. 15.3%, p 0.001). A. baumannii was an independent risk factor for mortality (OR, 2.03; 95% CI, 1.05–3.90; p 0.035) in the overall cohort after adjustment for other risk factors for death, including inappropriate antimicrobial therapy. The results demonstrated the difference in clinical presentation, microbial characteristics and outcomes between A. baumannii and A. nosocomialis nosocomial pneumonia, and supported that they are two distinct clinical entities.     

Carbapenem resistance and mortality in patients with Acinetobacter baumannii infection: systematic review and meta-analysis

Acinetobacter baumannii has emerged as a major cause of healthcare-associated infections. Controversy exists as to whether antimicrobial resistance increases the risk of mortality. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine this association. We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE databases up to May 2013 to identify studies comparing mortality in patients with carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii (CRAB) vs. carbapenem-susceptible A. baumannii (CSAB). A random-effects model was used to pool Odds Ratios (OR). Heterogeneity was examined using I². We included 16 observational studies. There were 850 reported deaths (33%) among the 2546 patients. Patients with CRAB had a significantly higher risk of mortality than patients with CSAB in the pooled analysis of crude effect estimates (crude OR = 2.22; 95% CI = 1.66, 2.98), although substantial heterogeneity was evident (heterogeneity I² = 55%). The association remained significant in the pooled adjusted OR of 10 studies. Studies reported that patients with CRAB compared to patients with CSAB were more likely to have severe underlying illness and also to receive inappropriate empirical antimicrobial treatment, which increases the risk of mortality. Our study suggests that carbapenem resistance may increase the risk of mortality in patients with A. baumannii infection. However, cautious interpretation is required because of the residual confounding factors and inadequate sample size in most studies.     

Clinical consequences of very major errors with semi-automated testing systems for antimicrobial susceptibility of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales

ObjectivesIn this study we investigated the rate of susceptibility testing discrepancies between semi-automated and reference systems with carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) and the impact of alleged errors by semi-automated systems on guiding targeted therapy for CRE bloodstream infection (BSI).MethodsThis was a multicentre, retrospective study enrolling patients with monomicrobial BSI caused by CRE from January 2013 to December 2016. Nonduplicate isolates from index blood cultures tested locally with semi-automated systems were centralized at a referral laboratory and retested with a reference broth microdilution or agar dilution method.ResultsWe enrolled 366 patients with CRE-BSI; 220 (60%) were male, and the median age was 67 years (interquartile range, 54–76 years). When compared with the results of the reference methods, those of the semi-automated systems exhibited variable rates of very major errors (VMEs; i.e. false susceptibilities) and major errors (MEs; i.e. false resistances). The highest rates of VMEs were observed with fosfomycin (14%) and colistin (13.9%), and the highest rates of MEs were observed with gentamicin (21%), fosfomycin (7.7%), and tigecycline (34%). Overall, VMEs and MEs led clinicians to prescribe or confirm ineffective therapy in 25 of 341 patients (7%). Receipt of ineffective therapy supported by a misleading susceptibility test was associated with higher 30-day mortality rates by Kaplan–Meier survival curves rates compared with receipt of active therapy (56% vs. 26%; p = 0.002), and the difference was confirmed after adjustment for confounders in a Cox regression model (adjusted hazard ratio: 2.91; 95% CI, 1.62–5.22; p < 0.001).DiscussionMEs and VMEs were relatively common with semi-automated susceptibility testing systems. VMEs were associated with inappropriate use of antibiotics and poorer outcomes.     

Colistin for pneumonia involving multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter calcoaceticus-Acinetobacter baumannii complex

ObjectivesTo investigate clinical and microbiological response, and 30-day mortality of pneumonia involving multidrug-resistant (MDR) Acinetobacter calcoaceticus-Acinetobacter baumannii (Acb) complex treated with colistin, and identify associated factors of these outcomes.MethodsA retrospective study of 183 adult patients with colistin treatment for at least 7 days between January 2014 and October 2017.ResultsThe mean age was 76.8 years, and mean Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score was 17.7. Eighteen (9.8%) and 128 (69.9%) patients had intravenous (IV) colistin alone and inhaled (IH) colistin alone, respectively. Thirty-seven patients had both IV and IH colistin, including 5 (2.7%) with concurrent, and 32 (17.5%) with non-concurrent use of IV and IH colistin. The 30-day mortality rate was 19.1% and 131 (71.6%) patients had clinical response. In the 175 patients with available data, 126 (72%) had microbiological eradication. The multivariate analyses revealed that IH colistin alone was an independent predictor for 30-day survival, clinical response, and microbiological eradication, and IV colistin alone was an independent predictor for clinical failure. Patients with IV colistin alone had a significantly higher nephrotoxicity rate than IH colistin alone (37.5% vs 6.1%, P = 0.001). Sub-group analysis of 52 patients with IV colistin for ≧ 4 days revealed that 14 (26.9%) patients had inappropriate dose, and inappropriate dose was an independent predictor for 30-day mortality.ConclusionsIH colistin provided good outcomes with few side effects, and appropriate dosing of IV colistin was important to avoid excess mortality.     

In vivo fitness of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii strains in murine infection is associated with treatment failure in human infections

ObjectivesMortality among patients with carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) infections varies between studies. We examined whether in vivo fitness of CRAB strains is associated with clinical outcomes in patients with CRAB infections.MethodsIsolates were collected from patients enrolled in the AIDA trial with hospital-acquired pneumonia, bloodstream infections and/or urinary tract infections caused by CRAB. The primary outcome was 14-day clinical failure, defined as failure to meet all criteria: alive; haemodynamically stable; improved or stable Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score; improved or stable oxygenation; and microbiological cure of bacteraemia. The secondary outcome was 14-day mortality. We tested in vivo growth using a neutropenic murine thigh infection model. Fitness was defined based on the CFU count 24 hours after injection of an inoculum of 10⁵ CFU. We used mixed-effects logistic regression to test the association between fitness and the two outcomes.ResultsThe sample included 266 patients; 215 (80.8%) experienced clinical failure. CRAB fitness ranged from 5.23 to 10.08 log CFU/g. The odds of clinical failure increased by 62% for every 1-log CFU/g increase in fitness (OR 1.62, 95% CI 1.04–2.52). After adjusting for age, Charlson score, SOFA score and acquisition in the intensive care unit, fitness remained significant (adjusted OR 1.63, 95% CI 1.03–2.59). CRAB fitness had a similar effect on 14-day mortailty, although the association was not statistically significant (OR 1.56, 95% CI 0.95–2.57). It became significant after adjusting for age, Charlson score, SOFA score and recent surgery (adjusted OR 1.88, 95% CI 1.09–3.25).ConclusionsIn vivo CRAB fitness was associated with clinical failure in patients with CRAB infection.     

Evaluation of the effect of appropriate antimicrobial therapy on mortality associated with Acinetobacter nosocomialis bacteraemia

Appropriate antimicrobial therapy is effective for severe infections caused by Acinetobacter baumannii, but efficacy for other Acinetobacter species remains to be established. The current study was designed to determine whether appropriate antimicrobial therapy reduces the mortality of patients with Acinetobacter nosocomialis bacteraemia. A 9-year retrospective study of 266 patients with monomicrobial A. nosocomialis bacteraemia was conducted at a large teaching hospital in Taiwan. Multivariable analysis was performed to evaluate the impact on 14-day mortality according to clinical characteristics, severity of disease and use of appropriate antimicrobial therapy. The influence of APACHE II score on the impact of appropriate antimicrobial therapy was analysed by including an interaction term. The overall 14-day mortality was 9.4%. Multivariable analysis revealed that APACHE II score was the only factor significantly associated with mortality (odds ratio, 1.18; 95% confidence interval, 1.11–1.25; p <0.001). Appropriate antimicrobial therapy was not associated with reduced mortality regardless of disease severity. In the subgroup analyses in patients with different clinical conditions, APACHE II score was consistently an independent factor for 14-day mortality, and appropriate antimicrobial therapy did not affect the mortality in any group. In conclusion, severity of disease, based on the APACHE II score, was the independent risk factor for 14-day mortality for patients with monomicrobial A. nosocomialis bacteraemia, even in different clinical conditions. In contrast, appropriate antimicrobial therapy did not reduce the 14-day mortality. The result highlighted a different effect of appropriate antimicrobial therapy on infections caused by two phenotypically undifferentiated Acinetobacter.