A novel combination of percutaneous stenting with iodine-125 seed implantation and chemotherapy for the treatment of pancreatic head cancer with obstructive jaundice

PurposeInsertion of radioactive strips through the biliary stent has been reported to offer longer survival and patency than an uncovered conventional self-expanding metal stent in patients with unresectable malignant biliary obstruction. The aim of this study was to investigate the safety and effectiveness of intraluminal brachytherapy combined with ¹²⁵I seed implantation and transarterial infusion chemotherapy for the treatment of pancreatic head cancer with obstructive jaundice.MethodFrom October 2012 to January 2018, 21 consecutive patients diagnosed with biliary obstruction caused by locally advanced, nonmetastatic pancreatic cancer with cytologically or histologically confirmed by biopsy were enrolled and receive treatment with intraluminal brachytherapy using ¹²⁵I seed strand and CT-guided percutaneous radioactive seed implantation therapy. The procedure-related and radiation complications were assessed. The outcomes were measured in terms of stent patency, patient survival, complications related to the procedure.ResultOne of the 22 patients (4.5%, 1/22) with pancreatic head cancer failed to perform the above procedure because the guidewire was unable to pass through the obstruction segment. The remaining 21 patients (95.5%, 21/22) with pancreatic head cancer with obstructive jaundice were successfully placed with biliary stents and radioactive strips through drainage tubes. The median number of ¹²⁵I seeds loaded was 15, ranging from 12 to 17. After the chemotherapy with gemcitabine and cisplatin, no adverse reaction of Grade Ⅲ ～ Ⅳ occurred in all cases. Median stent patency was 12.50 months (95% CI: 10.26, 14.74). By May 2019, all 21 patients had died, with overall survival of 5.2–23.3 months, with a median survival of 13.20 months (95% CI: 10.96, 15.44).ConclusionPercutaneous ¹²⁵I seed implantation combined with insertion of radioactive strips through the biliary stent has the characteristics of less trauma, fewer complications, simple operation, and so on. These procedures bring remission of obstructive jaundice combined with the increased survival for the treatment of obstructive jaundice caused by unresectable pancreatic head cancer if follow-up chemotherapy is carried out. The long-term efficacy of this treatment combination needs to be confirmed by further multicenter, large sample size prospective randomized controlled studies.     

Comparative Study of Percutaneous Transhepatic Biliary Stent Placement with or without Iodine-125 Seeds for Treating Patients with Malignant Biliary Obstruction

Purpose

To prospectively evaluate safety and efficacy of biliary stent placement with iodine-125 (¹²⁵I) seeds in patients with malignant obstructive jaundice (MOJ).

Managing occluded stents in biliary obstruction using radiofrequency ablation combined with 125I-strand brachytherapy

PURPOSEWe aimed to assess the effectiveness of percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (PRFA) combined with iodine-125 (¹²⁵I) seed strand brachytherapy (¹²⁵I-BT) for treatment of occluded biliary stents.METHODSFrom November 2015 to September 2017, 13 consecutive patients with occluded biliary metal stents, implanted for malignant obstruction, underwent PRFA combined with ¹²⁵I-BT to reopen the bile duct. Data included clinical and technical success, stent patency, complications, and overall survival.RESULTSThe clinical and technical success rates were both 100%. One month after treatment, the total serum bilirubin level had decreased significantly (p < 0.001). Early complications of cholangitis or hemobilia were experienced by one patient each. Three patients (23.1%) had late complications, including two cases of cholangitis and one case of cholecystitis. During the mean follow-up of 233±82.9 days (range, 88–365 days), the stent patency time was 239±26.5 days (95% CI, 187–291 days), and the 6-month stent patency rate was 68.4%. Five patents died; the mean survival time was 298±30.1 days (95% CI, 239–358 days). The 6-month survival rate was 83%.CONCLUSIONPRFA therapy combined with ¹²⁵I-BT is feasible and safe for patients with occluded metal stents placed for malignant biliary obstruction. Nevertheless, randomized controlled trails are needed to confirm the effectiveness of this new approach.

Self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) placement is an effective treatment for malignant biliary obstruction (1). However, stent restenosis occurs within 6 months in over 50% of patients, due to tumor ingrowth, overgrowth, epithelial hyperplasia, and biliary sludge formation (2, 3). There are no clear recommendations regarding how to re-open SEMS occlusions. Recently, some studies reported the safety and efficacy of a Habib EndoHPB percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (PRFA) catheter for re-opening occluded SEMSs, with a median stent patency time of 102–234 days (4–9).We previously showed that intraluminal brachytherapy (ILBT) with low dose rate (LDR) iodine-125 (¹²⁵I) seed strands is effective for treatment of malignant biliary obstruction, prolonging stent patency (10, 11). To the best of our knowledge, there are no reports regarding the use of PRFA and ILBT synchronously to re-open SEMS occlusions. This study assessed the feasibility and effectiveness of PRFA combined with ¹²⁵I seed strand brachytherapy (¹²⁵I-BT) for the treatment of malignant biliary occlusion after stenting.     

Lower Extremity Venous Stent Placement: A Large Retrospective Single-Center Analysis

PurposeTo study short-term and long-term outcomes of lower extremity venous stents placed at a single center and to characterize changes in vein diameter achieved by stent placement.Materials and MethodsA database of all patients who received lower extremity venous stents between 1996 and 2018 revealed 1,094 stents were placed in 406 patients (172 men, 234 women; median age, 49 y) in 513 limbs, including patients with iliocaval stents (9.4% acute thrombosis, 65.3% chronic thrombosis, 25.3% nonthrombotic lesions). Primary, primary assisted, and secondary patency rates were assessed for lower extremity venous stents at 1, 3, and 5 years using Kaplan-Meier analyses and summary statistics. Subset analyses and Cox regression were performed to identify risk factors for patency loss. Vein diameters and Villalta scores before and up to 12 months after stent placement were compared. Complication and mortality rates were calculated.ResultsPrimary, primary assisted, and secondary patency rates at 5 years were 57.3%, 77.2%, and 80.9% by Kaplan-Meier methods and 78.6%, 90.3%, and 92.8% by summary statistics. Median follow-up was 199 days (interquartile range, 35.2–712.0 d). Patency rates for the subset of patients (n = 46) with ≥ 5 years of follow-up (mean ± SD 9.1 y ± 3.4) were nearly identical to cohort patency rates at 5 years. Patients with inferior vena cava stent placement (hazard ratio 2.11, P < .0001) or acute thrombosis (hazard ratio 3.65, P < .0001) during the index procedure had significantly increased risk of losing primary patency status. Vein diameters were significantly greater after stent placement. There were no instances of stent fracture, migration, or structural deformities. In patients with chronic deep vein thrombosis, Villalta scores significantly decreased after stent placement (from 15.7 to 7.4, P < .0001). Perioperative mortality was < 1%, and major perioperative complication rate was 3.7%.ConclusionsCavo-ilio-femoral stent placement for venous occlusive disease achieves improvement of vein disease severity scores, increase in treated vein diameters, and satisfactory long-term patency rates.     

Percutaneous Metallic Stent Placement in Patients with Cancer Recurrence at Bilioenterostomy Site

PurposeTo investigate the outcomes of percutaneous metallic stent placement in patients with malignant bilioenterostomy obstruction and to assess the risk factors influencing stent patency.Materials and MethodsFrom August 2008 to January 2012, 53 patients with malignant bilioenterostomy obstructions were treated with percutaneous placement of biliary metallic stents; this included expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE)–covered stent placement in 36 patients and uncovered stent placement in 17 patients.ResultsA total of 75 stents were successfully placed in 53 patients. No major complications occurred in any patients, and minor complications occurred in nine patients (17%). The mean serum bilirubin level, which was 3.6 mg/dL ± 0.7 before drainage, decreased significantly to 2.5 mg/dL ± 0.4 at 1 month after stent placement (P = .041). Successful internal drainage was achieved in 44 of the 53 patients (83%). Kaplan–Meier analysis showed a median overall survival time of 145 days (95% confidence interval, 100–190 d), a median stent patency time of 313 days (95% confidence interval, 46–580 d), and cumulative stent patency rates at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months of 91%, 75%, 64%, 56%, and 45%, respectively. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that the use of uncovered stents (odds ratio, 2.924; P = .033) was the only significant independent factor associated with stent occlusion.ConclusionsPercutaneous metallic stent placement is a safe and effective method for the treatment of patients with malignant bilioenterostomy obstruction. Moreover, as uncovered stent placement is the only significant independent factor associated with stent occlusion, ePTFE-covered stent placement is preferable in these patients.     

Efficacy and safety of CT-guided 125I seed implantation as a salvage treatment for locally recurrent head and neck soft tissue sarcoma after surgery and external beam radiotherapy: A 12-year study at a single institution

ObjectivesThe objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of CT-guided radioactive ¹²⁵I seed implantation as a salvage treatment for locally recurrent head and neck soft tissue sarcoma (HNSTS) after surgery and external beam radiotherapy.Methods and MaterialsFrom December 2006 to February 2018, 25 patients with locally recurrent HNSTS after surgery and external beam radiotherapy were enrolled. All the patients successfully underwent CT-guided ¹²⁵I seed implantation. The primary end points included the objective response rate (ORR) and local progression-free survival (LPFS). The secondary end points were survival (OS) and safety profiles.ResultsAfter ¹²⁵I seed implantation, the ORR was 76.0%. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year LPFS rates were 65.6%, 34.4%, and 22.9%, respectively, with the median LPFS of 16.0 months. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates were 70.8%, 46.6%, and 34.0%, respectively, with the median OS of 28.0 months. Furthermore, univariate analyses showed that the recurrent T stage and histological grade were prognostic factors of LPFS, whereas only the histological grade was a predictor of OS. The major adverse events were skin/mucosal toxicities, which were generally of lower grade (≤Grade 2) and were well tolerated.ConclusionsRadioactive ¹²⁵I seed implantation could be an effective and safe alternative treatment for locally recurrent HNSTS after failure of surgery and radiotherapy. Recurrent T stage and histological grade were the main factors influencing the efficacy.     

No Advantage of Expanded Polytetrafluoroethylene and Fluorinated Ethylene Propylene–Covered Stents over Uncovered Nitinol Stents for Percutaneous Palliation of Malignant Infrahilar Biliary Obstruction: Results of a Single-Center Prospective Randomized Trial

PurposeTo prove that covered stents are more efficacious than uncovered stents regarding patency, safety, enabling of chemotherapy, and survival in percutaneous palliation of malignant infrahilar biliary obstruction.Materials and MethodsAfter failed endoscopic treatment, 154 patients with obstructive jaundice caused by unresectable infrahilar malignancy were randomly allocated to receive an expanded polytetrafluoroethylene and fluorinated ethylene propylene–covered or an uncovered nitinol stent. Occlusion rate, patency, and survival were assessed. Safety and clinical success in terms of chemotherapy were compared.ResultsThree patients were excluded post hoc. Fifteen patients died within 7 d and were excluded from patency analysis. Occlusion rates were 32% (21 of 66) for covered and 29% (20 of 70) for uncovered stents (P = .7). Estimated median patency durations were 308 d (95% confidence interval [CI], 178–438 d) for covered and 442 d (95% CI, 172–712 d) for uncovered stents (P = .1). Serious adverse events (P = 1.0) and 30-day mortality (P = .5) were equivalent between groups. At hospital discharge, median bilirubin reduction of 8 mg/dL was found in both groups (P < .001). In the covered stent group, 35 patients (48%) received palliative chemotherapy, vs 29 (37%) in the uncovered stent group (P = .2). Estimated median survival times were 96 days (95% CI, 68–124 d) with covered stents and 75 days (95% CI, 42–108 d) with uncovered stents (P = .6).ConclusionsIn malignant infrahilar biliary obstruction not amenable to endoscopy, no improvement in patency or survival with percutaneously placed covered stents could be confirmed. Covered and uncovered stent types exhibit similar safety profiles and clinical success rates.     

An iodine-125 seed strand combined with a metal stent versus a metal stent alone for obstructive jaundice caused by pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

PurposeThe purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of an iodine-125 (¹²⁵I) seed strand combined with a metal stent compared with a metal stent for treatment of obstructive jaundice caused by pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).Methods and MaterialsA retrospective analysis was carried out of patients who were referred to Shanghai Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University with a diagnosis of PDAC between January 1, 2010 and January 31, 2019. A total of 110 consecutive patients with obstructive jaundice caused by PDAC were divided into the iodine-125 seed strand combined with a metal stent group (Group A = 48) and the metal stent group (Group B = 62). The primary outcome was stent obstruction–free survival time, and secondary outcomes were overall survival and complications.ResultsThe median stent obstruction–free survival time was 133.0 (95% confidence interval (CI): 166.093–149.907) days, and the median overall survival was 212.0 (95% CI: 187.183–236.817) days in all patients. Median stent obstruction–free survival time was 175 days (95% CI 103.165–246.835 days) in Group A versus 120 days (95% CI 87.475–152.525 days) in Group B (p = 0.035). A lower Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score (p = 0. 000) and iodine-125 seed strand combined with metal stent implantation (p = 0.008) were associated with a longer stent obstruction–free survival time. Obstruction length (p = 0.083), ECOG score (p = 0.000), and iodine-125 seeds (p = 0.037) might have potential impact on stent obstruction–free survival time and were included for multivariable analysis using the Cox proportional hazards model. Stent restenosis was observed in 18.8% (9/48) of patients in Group A and 54.8% (34/62) in Group B, respectively. There was no significant difference in median survival between Group A and Group B (p = 0.409). The median survival in Group A was 209 days (95% CI 150.750–267.250) and 202 days (95% CI 190.624–233.376) in Group B. The median survival of patients with a lower ECOG score was better than that of patients with a higher ECOG score (267 days vs 132 days, p = 0.000). The Grade 3 or 4 complications occurred in 4 (8.3%) of the 48 patients in Group A (one case of hemobilia, one case of liver abscess, two cases of choleperitonitis) and in 5 (8.1%) of the 62 patients in Group B (one case of hemobilia, two cases of liver abscess, two cases of choleperitonitis) (p = 0.972).ConclusionsImplantation of an iodine-125 seed strand combined with a metal stent provides longer obstruction-free survival time compared with a metal stent in patients with obstructive jaundice caused by PDAC. It seems reasonable to choose an iodine-125 seed strand combined with a metal stent as a treatment for these patients.     

Treatment of malignant inferior vena cava obstruction with Gianturco-Rosch-Z stents: a single center 13-year experience

Rationale and objectivesMalignant obstruction of the IVC can cause severe morbidity and impairment of quality of life in end-stage oncology patients. However, medical literature regarding minimally-invasive palliation using large diameter percutaneous stents, particularly the Gianturco-Rosch-Z (GRZ) stent is limited.Materials & methodsA retrospective review from January 2004 to February 2017, revealed 17 subjects with malignant obstruction of the IVC who were treated with a total of 34 GRZ stents. Pre- and post-stent pressure gradients were measured in 10. Available data regarding clinical presentation and follow-up were recorded.ResultsTechnical success for stent deployment was 100%. A median of 2 stents (range 1 to 5) were deployed per patient, with median stent diameter 20 mm (range 15 to 30 mm). The median pre-treatment pressure gradient of 17.5 mmHg (range 9–31 mmHg) decreased to a median of 4.5 mmHg (range 0–21 mmHg, p < .0004) after stent placement. One subject developed recurrent stent occlusion due to disease progression requiring additional intervention, for a primary patency rate of 94%. Lower extremity edema improved or resolved in 58% of those for whom follow-up data was recorded. Median survival after treatment was only 28 days (range 5 to 607 days). There were no procedural complications.ConclusionEndovascular treatment of malignant IVC obstruction can be safely performed with GRZ stents. Although overall survival is poor, this technique can effectively palliate lower extremity edema symptoms.     

Stent Graft Placement for the Treatment of Hepatic Artery Injury in Patients with Cancer: Primary Patency and Clinical Outcomes

PurposeTo evaluate the safety, primary patency, and clinical outcomes of hepatic artery stent graft (SG) placement for vascular injuries.Materials and MethodsPatients treated with hepatic arterial SG placement for vascular injuries between September 2018 and September 2021 were reviewed. Data on demographic characteristics, indication, stent graft characteristics, antiplatelet/anticoagulant use, clinical success rate, complications, and type of follow-up imaging were collected. Follow-up images were reviewed by 2 independent reviewers to assess primary patency. A time-to-event analysis was performed. The median duration of stent graft patency was estimated using Kaplan-Meier curves. A Cox proportional hazard model was used to evaluate factors related to stent graft patency.ResultsThirty-five patients were treated with hepatic arterial SG placement, 11 for postoperative bleeds and 24 for hepatic artery infusion pump catheter–related complications. Clinical success was achieved in 32 (91%) patients (95% CI, 77–98). The median primary patency was 87 days (95% CI, 73–293). Stent grafts of ≥6-mm diameter retained patency for a longer duration than that with stent grafts of smaller diameters (6 mm vs 5 mm; hazard ratio, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.14–0.88; P = .026; and 7+ mm vs 5 mm; hazard ratio, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.09–0.83; P = .023). Anticoagulation/antiplatelet regimen was not associated with increased stent graft patency duration (P > .05). Only minor complications were reported in 2 (5.7%) patients.ConclusionsStent grafts can be used safely and effectively to treat injuries of the hepatic artery. Stent graft diameters of ≥6 mm seem to provide more durable patency.     

Stent Compression in Iliac Vein Compression Syndrome Associated with Acute Ilio-Femoral Deep Vein Thrombosis

ObjectiveThis study was conducted to evaluate stent compression in iliac vein compression syndrome (IVCS) and to identify its association with stent patency.ResultsAll of the stents used were laser-cut nitinol stents. The proportion of limbs showing significant stent compression was 33%. Fifty-six percent of limbs in the significant stent compression group developed stent occlusion. On the other hand, only 9% of limbs in the insignificant stent compression group developed stent occlusion. Significant stent compression was inversely correlated with stent patency (p < 0.001). The median patency period evaluated with Kaplan-Meier analysis was 20.0 months for patients with significant stent compression. Other factors including gender, age, and type of stent were not correlated with stent patency. Significant stent compression occurred most frequently (87.5%) at the upper end of the stent (ilio-caval junction).ConclusionSignificant compression of nitinol stents placed in IVCS highly affects stent patency. Therefore, in order to prevent stent compression in IVCS, nitinol stents with higher radial resistive force may be required.     

The role of seed implantation in patients with unresectable pancreatic carcinoma after relief of obstructive jaundice using ERCP

PurposeThe purpose of the study was to investigate the role of iodine-125 seed implantation, guided by endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and/or percutanous ultrasound, in patients with unresectable pancreatic carcinoma after relief of obstructive jaundice using endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP).Methods and MaterialsA total of 101 patients with obstructive jaundice due to unresectable pancreatic carcinoma were enrolled between January 2010 and December 2017 in this retrospective study. Of these patients, 50 underwent implantation of iodine-125 seeds under EUS and/or percutaneous ultrasound guidance after receiving a stent via ERCP (treatment group), and 51 received a stent via ERCP without undergoing seed implantation (control group). The clinical data and therapeutic outcomes of these patients were analyzed.ResultsCompared with the control group, the treatment group obtained significant relief of abdominal pain at the 1-week, 1-month, and 3-month followup (p < 0.05), with a significantly lower visual analog scale pain score (p < 0.05). The treatment group obtained a longer median survival (8.8 vs. 6.5 months, p = 0.02), longer median duration of stent patency (10.8 ± 1.4 vs. 6.9 ± 0.8 months, p = 0.02), and prolonged average time to gastric outlet obstruction (6.8 ± 1.6 vs. 5.3 ± 1.3 months, p = 0.02). Differences between liver function and appetite for the two groups were not significant (p > 0.05 and p = 0.59, respectively).ConclusionsIodine-125 seed implantation after relief of obstructive jaundice via ERCP prolongs survival, biliary stent patency, and time to gastric outlet obstruction and improves patient quality of life by relieving pancreatic pain in patients with unresectable pancreatic carcinoma.     

A stent with radioactive seed strand insertion for inoperable malignant biliary obstruction: A meta-analysis

PurposeThe purpose of the study was to assess the relative clinical effectiveness of stent insertion with or without radioactive seed strand (RSS) insertion in patients suffering from malignant biliary obstruction (MBO).Methods and MaterialsRelevant articles published as of November 2020 in the Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane Library databases were identified and analyzed. Primary study endpoints for this meta-analysis were stent dysfunction, stent patency, and overall survival (OS), whereas secondary endpoints were rates of clinical success and complications. RevMan v5.3 was used to perform all meta-analyses.ResultsIn total, there were nine studies incorporating 643 patients (280 and 363 who underwent stent insertion with and without RSS, respectively). No differences were observed between these groups with respect to pooled rates of clinical success (p = 0.25), stent dysfunction (p = 0.47), cholangitis (p = 0.97), cholecystitis (p = 0.95), or pancreatitis (p = 0.66). However, stent patency duration (p < 0.00001) and patients’ OS (p < 0.00001) were significantly increased in patients in the stent + RSS group. No heterogeneity was detected for any of these endpoints, nor did funnel plots yield any publication bias. A subgroup analysis of patients with hilar MBO similarly exhibited stent + RSS insertion to be associated with longer stent patency and OS as compared with stent insertion alone.ConclusionsThese findings showed that relative to stent insertion, stent + RSS insertion is associated with longer OS and stent patency in patients with inoperable MBO.     

Treatment of Arm Swelling in Hemodialysis Patients with Ipsilateral Arteriovenous Access and Central Vein Stenosis: Conversion to the Hemodialysis Reliable Outflow Graft versus Stent Deployment

PurposeTo compare outcomes after conversion of arteriovenous (AV) access to Hemodialysis Reliable Outflow (HeRO) graft vs stent deployment in patients with arm swelling owing to ipsilateral central vein stenosis.Materials and MethodsThis single-center retrospective study comprised 48 patients (19 men, mean age 58 y) with arm swelling ipsilateral to AV access and central vein stenosis over a 13-year period who had clinical follow-up and without prior central stents. Twenty-one patients underwent placement of a HeRO graft with anastomosis of the HeRO graft to the existing graft or fistula, and 27 patients underwent central venous stent deployment. Symptomatic improvement in arm swelling and access patency rates after intervention were ascertained from medical records.ResultsImprovement in swelling within 1 month after HeRO conversion and stent deployment was found in 95% and 89%, respectively (P = .62). Swelling eventually recurred in 16 patients (59%) treated with stents compared with 1 patient (5%) who underwent HeRO conversion (P < .001). Primary access patency was statistically significantly longer after HeRO conversions than stent deployments, with 6- and 12-month primary patency rates of 89% and 72% vs 47% and 11% (P < .001). HeRO conversions also resulted in longer 6- and 12-month secondary access patency rates (95% and 95% vs 79% and 58%, P = .006). Mean number of interventions per 1,000 access days to maintain secondary patency was 2.7 for the HeRO group vs 6.3 for the stent group.ConclusionsAlthough stent deployment and HeRO graft conversion are effective for alleviating arm swelling in the short term in patients receiving hemodialysis with clinically significant arm swelling and functioning AV access, the HeRO graft has more durable results.     

Endovascular Treatment of Malignant Superior Vena Cava Syndrome through Upper-Limb Access: A Comparison between Venous-Dedicated and Conventional Stents

PurposeTo retrospectively evaluate the technical and clinical outcomes of superior vena cava (SVC) stent placement through upper-limb venous access in malignant SVC syndrome (SVCS) and compare the efficacy of different nitinol stent types.Materials and MethodsBetween 2006 and 2018, 156 patients (132 male; mean age, 62 y; age range, 33–81 y) underwent SVC stent placement for malignant obstructions through upper-limb venous access with 1 of 3 types of nitinol stent: 1 venous-dedicated (Sinus-XL stent) and 2 non–venous-dedicated (E-Luminexx Vascular Stent and Protégé GPS). Cases of common femoral vein access or non-nitinol stents were excluded from further analysis. The mean duration of follow-up was 8 mo.ResultsTechnical success was achieved in 99.3% of cases. One patient died during the procedure as a result of cardiac tamponade. Balloon predilation was performed in 10 patients and postdilation in 126. Mean procedural time was 34.4 min (range, 18–80 min). Overall survival rates were 92.3%, 57.3%, and 26.8%, and overall primary patency rates were 94.5%, 84.8% and 79.6%, at 1, 6, and 12 mo, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in primary patency rates between venous- and non–venous-dedicated stents or among different Stanford SVCS grading groups (P > .05).ConclusionsSVC stent placement through an upper-limb approach is a safe, fast, and effective technique. There is no evident benefit of venous-dedicated vs non–venous-dedicated stents in the treatment of malignant SVCS.     

125I seed implantation for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombus: A systematic review and meta-analysis

PurposeAdvanced hepatocellular carcinoma often combined with portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT), transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) is recommended as an effective treatment. Recent studies showed that TACE plus iodine-125 (¹²⁵I) seed for hepatocellular carcinoma with PVTT can improve the remission rate. This study aimed to systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of ¹²⁵I seed implantation in patients with PVTT.Methods and MaterialsThe Embase, Medline/PubMed, Cochrane Library, and OVID databases were systematically searched from the earliest to October 2018. The references included in the literature were searched. The primary endpoints were remission rate and overall survival, and the secondary endpoints were portal venous pressure and adverse event. The odds ratio (OR) and hazard ratio (HR) were combined using either fixed or random effects model. Meta-analysis was performed using Stata 12.0 software.ResultsEight studies were included with 1098 patients, 591 patients received ¹²⁵I seed implantation, and 507 in the control group. Meta-analysis showed that ¹²⁵I seed implantation improved the remission rate in patients with PVTT (OR = 2.24, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.68–2.99, p = 0.000) and survival rate (HR = 0.27, 95% CI = 0.14–0.40, p = 0.000); it also reduced patient's mortality risk (HR = 0.46, 95% CI = 0.37–0.54, p = 0.000). Subgroup analysis suggested that the death risk of patients who responded to ¹²⁵I seed implantation declined 55% (HR = 0.45, 95% CI = 0.34–0.55, p = 0.000). ¹²⁵I seed implantation is more effective against PVTT delivered at a dose higher than 110 Gy. There was no difference in the occurrence adverse event between the two groups (OR = 1.07, 95% CI = 0.92–1.25, p = 0.262).ConclusionTACE plus ¹²⁵I seed implantation is more effective in treating PVTT. The use of ¹²⁵I seeds dose >110 Gy will show better results.     

Percutaneous Cystic Duct Interventions and Drain Internalization for Calculous Cholecystitis in Patients Ineligible for Surgery

PurposeTo evaluate the feasibility, effectiveness, and outcomes of percutaneous cholecystostomy drain internalization in patients with calculous cholecystitis who were not surgical candidates.Materials and MethodsPercutaneous cystic duct interventions were attempted in 17 patients (with the intent to place dual cholecystoduodenal stents) who were deemed unfit for surgery and had previously undergone percutaneous cholecystostomies for acute calculous cholecystitis. Baseline demographics, technical success, time from percutaneous cholecystostomy to internalization (dual cholecystoduodenal stent placement), stent patency duration, and adverse event rates were evaluated.ResultsFifteen (88%) of 17 procedures to cross the cystic duct were technically successful. Of these 17 patients, 13 (76%) underwent successful placement of dual cholecystoduodenal stents. Two of these 13 patients (who had successful dual cholecystoduodenal stent placement) needed repeat percutaneous cholecystostomy drains (1 patient had stent migration leading to recurrent cholecystitis, and the other had a perihepatic biloma). The 1-year patency rate was 77% (95% CI, 47%–100%).ConclusionsDual cholecystoduodenal stent placement in nonsurgical patients is a technically feasible treatment option with the goal to remove percutaneous cholecystostomy drains.     

Percutaneous Unilateral Biliary Metallic Stent Placement in Patients with Malignant Obstruction of the Biliary Hila and Contralateral Portal Vein Steno-Occlusion

Objective

To investigate the outcomes of percutaneous unilateral metallic stent placement in patients with a malignant obstruction of the biliary hila and a contralateral portal vein steno-occlusion.

Materials and Methods

Sixty patients with a malignant hilar obstruction and unilobar portal vein steno-occlusion caused by tumor invasion or preoperative portal vein embolization were enrolled in this retrospective study from October 2010 to October 2013. All patients were treated with percutaneous placement of a biliary metallic stent, including expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE)-covered stents in 27 patients and uncovered stents in 33 patients.

Results

A total of 70 stents were successfully placed in 60 patients. Procedural-related minor complications, including self-limiting hemobilia (n = 2) and cholangitis (n = 4) occurred in six (10%) patients. Acute cholecystitis occurred in two patients. Successful internal drainage was achieved in 54 (90%) of the 60 patients. According to a Kaplan-Meier analysis, median survival time was 210 days (95% confidence interval [CI], 135-284 days), and median stent patency time was 133 days (95% CI, 94-171 days). No significant difference in stent patency was observed between covered and uncovered stents (p = 0.646). Stent dysfunction occurred in 16 (29.6%) of 54 patients after a mean of 159 days (range, 65-321 days).

Conclusion

Unilateral placement of ePTFE-covered and uncovered stents in the hepatic lobe with a patent portal vein is a safe and effective method for palliative treatment of patients with a contralateral portal vein steno-occlusion caused by an advanced hilar malignancy or portal vein embolization. No significant difference in stent patency was detected between covered and uncovered metallic stents.     

Dosimetry,efficacy, and safety of three-dimensional printing noncoplanar template-assisted and CT-guided 125I seed implantation for recurrent retroperitoneal lymphatic metastasis after external beam radiotherapy

ObjectivesTo evaluate the dosimetry, efficacy, and safety of radioactive ¹²⁵I seed implantation (RISI) assisted by three-dimensional printing noncoplanar template (3D-PNCT) and CT for recurrent retroperitoneal lymphatic metastasis (RRLM) after previous external beam radiotherapy.Methods and MaterialsFrom June 2016 to August 2018, 32 patients with RRLM successfully underwent 3D-PNCT–assisted and CT-guided RISI. The dosimetry, pain relief rate, performance improvement rate, overall response rate, disease control rate, local control time (LCT), overall survival (OS), and safety profiles were evaluated.ResultsDosimetric results showed that the D90, D100, V100, V150, V200, and homogeneity index were consistent in preoperation and postoperation (p > 0.05), except for the external index and conformal index (p = 0.048, p = 0.034). After RISI, 81.3% of the patients achieved pain relief, and 71.9% achieved an improvement of performance. The overall response rate and disease control rate were 85.3% and 94.1%, respectively. The LCT rates reached 66.2% and 43.2% in 1 year and two years, respectively, with a median LCT of 15.8 months. The OS rates were 74.1% and 28.1% in 1 year and two year, respectively, with a median OS reaching 17.6 months. Univariate analysis showed that when D90 > 130 Gy or D100 > 63 Gy or tumor size ≤49.8 cm³, LCT was extended significantly, but not for OS. Except for two patients developing Grade 1 retroperitoneal hematomas, no other severe adverse events were observed.Conclusions3D-PNCT and CT guidance provide excellent accuracy for RISI, which can be an effective and safe alternative for RRLM after external beam radiotherapy. Radiation dose and tumor size seem to significantly influence the local control.     

Percutaneous Treatment of Benign Biliary Anastomotic Strictures: Retrievable Covered Self-Expandable Metal Stent with Fixation String Versus Large-Bore Catheters

PurposeTo retrospectively compare the safety and efficacy of a covered self-expandable metal stent (CSEMS) with a transhepatic fixation string and a large-bore catheter for benign biliary anastomotic stricture after hepatobiliary surgery.Materials and MethodsFrom March 2012 to June 2017, 49 patients with benign biliary anastomotic strictures, untreatable with endoscopy, were included. Twenty-three patients (catheter group) were treated with a large-bore catheter (with progressive catheter upsizing to 16–18 Fr), whereas 26 patients (stent group) were treated by CSEMS (10-mm stent) placement. Technical success, clinical success, primary patency, recurrent strictures, complication rate, and catheter or stent indwelling time were compared between the groups.ResultsTechnical success and clinical success were achieved in all patients. In the stent group, stent retrieval was successful in all patients. The overall complication rate was 24.5% (catheter group vs. stent group, 30.4% vs. 19.2%; P = .363). Stent migration occurred in 1 patient during follow-up (1/26, 3.8%). The mean indwelling time was 10.3 ± 3.0 months (range, 8–16 months; median, 10 months) in the catheter group and 4.0 ± 1.2 months (range, 3–7 months; median, 4 months) in the stent group (P < .001). Recurrent strictures occurred in 10 (43.5%) patients in the catheter group and 4 (15.4%) patients in the stent group (P = .030). The 1- and 3-year primary patency rates were 82.6% and 69.3% in the catheter group and 92.3% and 84.4% in the stent group (P = .042).ConclusionsPercutaneous placement of a retrievable CSEMS showed superior intermediate-term outcomes over a large-bore catheter in patients with benign biliary anastomotic strictures.