Prospective randomized trial comparing the Shouldice technique and plication darn for inguinal hernia.

The lowest recurrence rates after inguinal hernia repair have been achieved by specialized hernia clinics. The Shouldice repair achieves success through application of a meticulous standardized operation carried out by specialist hernia surgeons. In a trial designed to rule out surgeon-dependent variables, 322 inguinal hernias were randomized prospectively to Shouldice repair or plication darn. Fifteen general surgeons operated on 322 patients. Fourteen surgeons in training not familiar with Shouldice repair received constant supervision for six repairs before independent operation. The mean (s.d.) patient age was 58.3(1.5) (range 20-84) years for Shouldice repair and 57.0(1.2) (range 18-85 years) for plication darn. The sex ratio (M:F) was 17:1 and right side to left side ratio 1.8:1. Six-week complication rates for wound infection (Shouldice repair, 5 per cent; plication darn, 4 per cent) and haematoma (Shouldice repair, 7 per cent; plication darn, 5 per cent) were similar in both groups. There were a similar number of sliding hernias in the Shouldice repair (14) and plication darn (20) groups. After a mean follow-up of 30 (range 24-48) months there were seven recurrences in the Shouldice group and four in the plication darn group (P > 0.05). The recurrences suggest that additional supervision of junior surgeons is required during the Shouldice repair learning period.     

Combined transurethral prostatectomy and inguinal hernia repair: a retrospective audit and literature review.

OBJECTIVE: To audit the results of combined transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) and inguinal hernia repair, often carried out under the same anaesthetic (because bladder outlet obstruction from prostatic disease and inguinal hernia are both common conditions in elderly men), to avoid two separate operations. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study included 85 patients who underwent primary inguinal hernia repair with TURP in the urology unit of Nottingham City hospital between 1989 and 1995, and who were recalled to a special clinic. The type of hernia and repair carried out were recorded and complications audited with specific reference to recurrence of hernia and wound infection. RESULTS: The 85 patients underwent 88 primary inguinal hernia repairs with TURP (three were bilateral). Maloney's darn repair was used on 55 and a Bassini repair on 33 occasions, respectively. Two patients developed mild wound infection after surgery, but only two patients (2%) had recurrence of hernia. CONCLUSIONS: The recurrence rate after primary inguinal herniorraphy with conventional methods of repair, performed with TURP, was comparable with published results of hernia repairs alone, before the introduction of Lichtenstein's mesh repair.     

Review of the management of recurrent inguinal hernia

Background: There is little available evidence on the optimal management of recurrent inguinal hernia, particularly if the original procedure involved the use of mesh. This study was a review of recurrent hernia repair in a district hospital, involving both laparoscopic and open procedures. Methods: The case notes of all patients who had a repair of a recurrent hernia between 1991 and 2000, inclusive, were examined; 171 procedures were included. Where known, the original repair was a nylon darn in 31%, mesh repair in 18%, and laparoscopic repair in 8%. Results: The recurrent hernia was repaired using a Lichtenstein open mesh technique in 63% and by the totally extraperitoneal (TEP) method in 22%. Complication rates were highest after emergency surgery (all had open surgery), where 71% had complications and one patient died. For elective repairs, complication rates were similar after open (13%) and TEP (8%) repairs. The duration of hospital stay was also similar (1.2 vs 1.3 days, respectively), and a single recurrence was seen in each group. Patients with recurrence after primary mesh repair were also managed by both techniques with similar results. Open re-operation for mesh failure was technically straightforward. Conclusions: Most recurrent hernias are still repaired by open techniques. There was no convincing evidence of different outcomes for open and TEP repairs in this review. Even when the original hernia repair involved the use of mesh, further open repair by an experienced surgeon is justified.     

Single surgeon experience with bilayer polypropylene mesh repair of inguinal hernia

Background: Open mesh repair of inguinal hernia has been shown to be an effective and safe method of hernia repair. In search of the ‘ideal’ method of open mesh hernia repair, many different methods of mesh placement have been developed. Laparoscopic hernia repair is reported to be superior to open repair in terms of postoperative pain and rehabilitation. These improved functional outcomes could be the result of placement of mesh in the preperitoneal space (underlay), rather than the laparoscopic method per se. A bilayer polypropylene mesh implant has been developed that provides onlay and underlay (preperitoneal) mesh layers. The present study reports the singular experience of a general surgeon with this bilayer polypropylene mesh implant. Methods: A retrospective audit of the first 169 consecutive inguinal hernia repairs was conducted by mailed questionnaire and telephone interview. Data was collected on patient demographics, postoperative pain scores and complications. Patients with potential recurrences at the time of follow up were invited for clinical review. Results: One hundred and three patients (71%) participated in the audit. Thirteen per cent of cases were for recurrent hernia. Median age was 60 years (range 21?99). Median length of follow up was 19 months (range 8?27). No recurrences were detected in the patients who underwent primary repair of inguinal hernia. Conclusion: Inguinal hernia repair with bilayer polypropylene mesh is safe and has low complication and recurrence rates.     

Randomized clinical trial of non-mesh versus mesh repair of primary inguinal hernia

BACKGROUND: The optimum method for inguinal hernia repair has not yet been determined. The recurrence rate for non-mesh methods varies between 0.2 and 33 per cent. The value of tension-free repair with prosthetic mesh remains to be confirmed. The aim of this study was to compare mesh and non-mesh suture repair of primary inguinal hernias with respect to clinical outcome, quality of life and cost in a multicentre randomized trial in general hospitals. METHODS: Between September 1993 and January 1996, all patients scheduled for repair of a unilateral primary inguinal hernia were randomized to non-mesh or mesh repair. The patients were followed up at 1 week and at 1, 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 months. Clinical outcome, quality of life and costs were registered. RESULTS: Three hundred patients were randomized of whom 11 were excluded. Three-year recurrence rates differed significantly: 7 per cent for non-mesh repair (n = 143) and 1 per cent for mesh repair (n = 146) (P = 0.009). There were no differences in clinical variables, quality of life and costs. CONCLUSION: Mesh repair of primary inguinal hernia repair is superior to non-mesh repair with regard to hernia recurrence and is cost-effective. Postoperative complications, pain and quality of life did not differ between groups.     

Risk of recurrence 5 years or more after primary Lichtenstein mesh and sutured inguinal hernia repair

BACKGROUND: The risk of recurrence of inguinal hernia within 5 years of repair is lower after mesh than sutured repair in men, but no large-scale studies have compared the risk of recurrence beyond 5 years. METHODS: The Danish Hernia Database prospectively collects data on almost all primary inguinal hernia repairs in men (older than 18 years). This study used data recorded over 8 years, analysing reoperations for recurrent hernia in the intervals 0-30 months, 30-60 months and 60-96 months after operation. RESULTS: The reoperation rate was significantly lower after Lichtenstein open mesh repairs than open sutured repairs (Cox hazard ratio (HR) 0.45 (95 per cent confidence interval (c.i.) 0.39 to 0.51) for 0-30 months after surgery; HR 0.38 (95 per cent c.i. 0.29 to 0.49) for 30-60 months). In 13 674 primary inguinal hernia repairs with an observation interval of 5 years or more, the risk of reoperation after Lichtenstein repair was a quarter of that after sutured repair (HR 0.25 (95 per cent c.i. 0.16 to 0.40) for 60-96 months after surgery). After 5 years, the reoperation rate increased continuously after sutured repair but not after mesh repair. CONCLUSION: Lichtenstein mesh repair for inguinal hernia prevented recurrence beyond 5 years after the primary operation, but sutured repair did not.     

Randomized clinical trial of Lichtenstein's operation versus mesh plug for inguinal hernia repair

BACKGROUND: Two of the most commonly used open prosthetic tension-free techniques for inguinal hernia repair are Lichtenstein's operation and the mesh plug repair. The technique of choice remains a subject of ongoing debate. The objective of the present investigation was to compare the two surgical procedures with respect to associated morbidity and recurrence rates. METHODS: Five hundred and ninety-five patients with 700 primary or recurrent inguinal hernias were randomized to undergo either Lichtenstein's operation or mesh plug repair. The primary endpoint of the investigation was the recurrence rate 1 year after surgery. Secondary endpoints were perioperative complications and reoperation rates. RESULTS: At 12-month follow-up, 597 hernia repairs (85.3 per cent) were evaluated. There were no significant differences regarding recurrence rates and perioperative complications. However, there was a significant difference in the overall reoperation rate between the two treatment groups, with 13 reoperations (4.2 per cent) in the Lichtenstein group and four (1.4 per cent) in the mesh plug group (P = 0.047). CONCLUSION: Lichtenstein's operation and the mesh plug repair are comparable with respect to perioperative complications and recurrence rates.     

Effects of training and supervision on recurrence rate after inguinal hernia repair

BACKGROUND: There is little information about the effects of operative experience and supervision of trainees on outcome in inguinal hernia surgery, one of the cornerstone operations of basic surgical training. METHODS: All primary inguinal hernia repairs carried out between 1994 and 2001 were registered prospectively in the Lothian Surgical Audit database. Subsequent problems that required re-referral were identified from this database. Patients who required reoperation for recurrence a median of 3 (range 1-7) years after surgery were identified. RESULTS: Some 4406 repairs, including 90 recurrences (2.0 per cent), were identified. Open mesh, open sutured and laparoscopic techniques were employed. Senior trainees (registrars and senior registrars) had similar recurrence rates to consultants; supervision did not affect outcome. Junior trainees (senior house officers) had similar recurrence rates to consultants as long as they were supervised by either a senior trainee or a consultant. Unsupervised junior trainees had unacceptably high recurrence rates (open mesh: relative risk (RR) 21.0 (95 per cent confidence interval (c.i.) 7.3 to 59.9), P < 0.001; open sutured: RR 16.5 (95 per cent c.i. 7.2 to 37.8), P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Senior trainees may operate independently and supervise junior trainees, with recurrence rates equal to those of consultant surgeons. Junior trainees should be encouraged and given more practice in inguinal hernia repair with appropriate supervision.     

Randomized clinical trial comparing suture and mesh repair of umbilical hernia in adults

BACKGROUND: Prosthetic repair has become the standard method for inguinal hernia and has excellent results. The question remains of whether the mesh technique could also improve results for umbilical defects. METHODS: The study was a randomized clinical trial comparing herniorrhaphy (primary suture) with hernioplasty (polypropylene mesh or plug) in 200 adult patients with a primary umbilical hernia. Patients at high anaesthetic risk (American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade IV) or those who needed emergency surgery were excluded. The mean postoperative follow-up was 64 months. The population studied included 118 women and 82 men with a mean age at presentation of 57 years. Some 173 patients were ASA grade I-II and 27 were ASA III. The anaesthetic technique of choice was local anaesthetic infiltration plus sedation (98 per cent). RESULTS: There were no significant anaesthetic complications or surgical deaths. The mean duration of surgery was greater for mesh than for suture repair (45 versus 38 min). Rates of early complications such as seroma, haematoma or wound infection were similar in the two groups. The hernia recurrence rate was higher after suture repair (11 per cent) than after mesh repair (1 per cent) (P = 0.0015). CONCLUSION: Prosthetic repair could become the standard treatment for primary umbilical hernia in adults.     

Randomized clinical trial of suture repair, polypropylene mesh or autodermal hernioplasty for incisional hernia

BACKGROUND: Since conventional suture repair for incisional hernia is associated with high recurrence rates, alloplastic and autoplastic prosthetic techniques have been suggested. METHODS: In a randomized trial, 160 patients with simple or complex hernias underwent either suture repair, autodermal skin graft or onlay polypropylene mesh repair. Suture repair was not done in complex hernias. This report concerns a planned interim analysis. RESULTS: At mean follow-up of 16 months, there were 17 hernia recurrences that were distributed similarly between the surgical techniques. There were fewer infectious complications after suture repair (three of 33 patients) than after skin graft or mesh repair (seven of 39 and five of 28 for simple hernias; seven of 31 and ten of 29 respectively for complex hernias) (P not significant). The severity of infections after polypropylene mesh implantation prompted the trial committee to discontinue the study. No differences were noted in duration of stay in hospital and quality of life. However, pain was significantly more frequent after polypropylene mesh repair (pooled risk ratio 2.9 and 1.8 at 6 weeks and 1 year respectively). CONCLUSION: Suture repair was safe for small incisional hernias. Both autoplastic and alloplastic hernia repair yielded comparably low recurrence rates, but led to a high rate of wound infection.     

Attendance at a pain clinic with severe chronic pain after open and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repairs

BACKGROUND: The aim was to compare the frequency of severe chronic pain that required attendance at a pain clinic after open and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repairs. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of 7999 patients who underwent inguinal hernia repair between January 1994 and December 2001. The definition of severe chronic pain was pain related to inguinal hernia surgery that was bad enough for the patient to seek further medical help and be referred to the specialist pain clinic after exclusion of surgically correctable pathology such as hernia recurrence. RESULTS: During the study there were 7153 open repairs and 846 laparoscopic repairs. Sixty-nine patients (1.0 per cent) were referred to the pain clinic a median of 16.9 (range 5.1-69.4) months after open hernia repair. Three patients (0.4 per cent) were referred a median of 16.5 (range 7.3-21.5) months after laparoscopic hernia repair (P = 0.045). CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair was associated with a significantly lower frequency of attendance at the pain clinic with severe chronic pain.     

Hernioplasty: a new approach against the recurrence

In the repair of inguinal hernia, the primary objective is to stop the recurrence of hernia, but it seems this expectation has not been met even with the Lichtenstein mesh repair. Therefore, a totally recurrence-free result cannot be reached until a rational technique is developed. In the new approach, the repair of the inguinal hernia was carried out routinely by a combination of a tension-free mesh implantation along with the on-lay nylon darn. The outcome of this new approach in 125 consecutive patients was found to be very satisfactory, with no evidence of recurrent inguinal hernia apart from a superficial wound infection developed in one patient and both wound infection and wound haematoma in another patient. A recurrence-free inguinal hernia is not a myth in this combined approach, which provides a complementary benefit to each other and a total satisfaction to the patient. It is also cost-effective in the long run.No financial support or sponsorship from any commercial firm in any kind of material or free supply of mesh from any firm was received for this study. No manufacturer is involved in the design of this new device and no preference to a particular type of mesh was used in this study.     

Hernia repair in elderly patients

Background This study evaluates a 5-year experience of the management of the most frequent abdominal wall hernias in an elderly population. Methods From April 1990 to December 1995, 231 inguinal, 12 femoral and seven umbilical hernias were repaired in 221 patients (mean age 74 (range 66–93) years). Concomitant diseases were present in 157 patients, A mesh repair was performed with ‘tension-free’ or ‘plug’ techniques in all but 23 inguinal and two femora! hernia repairs, in which the Bassini or Shouldice procedures were adopted. Ten emergency hernia repairs were performed for strangulation. A total of 232 operations, including four emergency hernia repairs, were carried out under local anaesthesia. Results There was no perioperative mortality. Acute intestinal bleeding occurred 2 days after surgery in a patient with colonic diverticular disease. Urinary retention occurred once following emergency hernia repair under general anaesthesia and twice after elective hernia repair under local anaesthesia. Local complications included four scrotl haematomas (2 per cent), three wound infections (1 per cent) and one case of orchitis with atrophy after repair of a recurrent hernia. There was one recurrence after a Bassini repair and one after Shouldice inguinal herniorrhaphy. No recurrence was observed after mesh repair. Conclusion Local anaesthetic mesh hernia repair is safe and effective in elderly patients. Age should be no bar to elective hernia repair. This policy should avoid the complications of emergency operation.     

Stapled and nonstapled laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) inguinal hernia repair

Background: Controversy exists regarding whether it is necessary to secure the mesh prosthesis during laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) inguinal hernia repair. It is unknown whether stapling the mesh affects recurrence rate, incidence of neuralgia, or port-site hernia. Methods: We conducted a prospective randomized trial comparing stapled with nonstapled laparoscopic TAPP inguinal hernia repairs in a series of 502 consecutive patients undergoing elective inguinal hernia repair at two institutions between January 1995 and March 1997. Results: In all, 263 nonstapled and 273 stapled repairs were performed in 502 patients. Patients were evaluated at a median follow-up of 16 months (range, 1–32 months) by independent surgeons. There was no statistical difference in the incidence of recurrence (0 to 263 nonstapled, 3 to 273 stapled; chi-square p= 0.09). The overall recurrence rate was 0.6%. There was no significant difference in operative time, port-site hernia, chronic pain or neuralgia between the two groups. Conclusion: It is not necessary to secure the mesh during laparoscopic TAPP inguinal hernia repair, allowing a reduction in the size of the ports. Received: 28 July 1998/Accepted: 25 November 1998     

Recurrences after conventional anterior and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a randomized comparison

OBJECTIVE: To study the long-term recurrence rate and other complications after conventional and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Reliable long-term follow-up of patients with inguinal hernias treated by laparoscopic repair techniques is lacking. METHODS: The authors performed a randomized, multicenter trial in which 487 patients with inguinal hernia were treated by totally extraperitoneal laparoscopic repair and 507 patients were treated by conventional anterior hernia repair. Patients were followed and examined for recurrence and chronic inguinal pain 2, 3, and 5 years after surgery. Risk factors for recurrence and chronic inguinal pain were assessed. RESULTS: Patients who underwent conventional repair had a high risk for recurrence compared to patients who underwent laparoscopic repair. Risk factors for recurrence were operative time and type of conventional repair. Predictive independent risk factors for chronic inguinal pain were conventional repair (Bassini repairs and non-bassini repairs), inguinal pain before surgery, and perioperative lesion of the ilioinguinal nerve. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with inguinal hernia who undergo laparoscopic repair have fewer recurrences and less chronic inguinal pain than those who undergo conventional open repair. The Bassini repair produces unacceptably high recurrence rates.     

Lichtenstein无张力疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝4011例

目的：评估Lichtenstein无张力疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的结果并总结临床经验。方法回顾性分析3 631例腹股沟疝患者的4011例（其中双侧疝380例）Lichtenstein无张力疝修补术的临床资料。结果 经Lichtenstein手术治疗的3 631例腹股沟疝患者平均住院3.8d,术后并发症发病率为2.4％,复发率为0.1％。结论 在局麻下对腹股沟疝患者施行Lichtenstein手术具有术后恢复快、复发率和并发症发病率低的特点。     

Inguinal hernia repair by surgical trainees at a Malaysian teaching hospital

OBJECTIVE: To assess the outcome of inguinal hernia repaired by surgical trainees at Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Hospital. METHODS: Retrospective review of 103 patients who underwent surgery between November 2001 and October 2002. RESULTS: The mean age of patients was 50 years and the male-to-female ratio was 20:1. Most hernias (60%) were right-sided inguinal hernias. Admissions consisted of 60% elective, 31% day-case and 9% emergency. General anaesthesia was administered in 66% of cases, spinal anaesthesia in 33% and local anaesthesia in 1%. Ten inguinal hernia repairs were performed by first-year trainees, 61 by third-year trainees and 19 by fourth-year trainees. First-year trainees did more darning (60%) and fewer mesh (40%) repairs. Third-year trainees still used darning (57%) but also performed more mesh repairs (43%). Fourth-year trainees performed 68% darning (mainly to teach the first-year trainees) and 32% mesh repairs. Senior surgeons assisted in 13 difficult cases where mesh repair was preferred (92%) to darning repairs (8%). Prophylactic antibiotic was more frequently used in patients undergoing mesh repair (p < 0.001). The mean operative time was the same for both types of repair. There were no significant differences in complications between the two types of repair. One hernia recurred after darning repair but none after mesh repair. CONCLUSIONS: Mesh repair of inguinal hernia is effective. Trainees easily acquire this skill and it becomes their preferred method of repair.     

Endoscopic totally extraperitoneal repair of bilateral inguinal hernias.

BACKGROUND: Recurrence rates associated with bilateral inguinal hernia repair with a giant prosthesis (Stoppa procedure) are low. Endoscopic totally extraperitoneal bilateral inguinal hernia repair with a giant prosthesis combines the low recurrence rate of the Stoppa repair and the advantages of minimally invasive surgery. The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate whether extraperitoneal bilateral inguinal hernia repair could be performed by the minimally invasive, totally extraperitoneal approach. METHODS: From February 1993 to January 1998, 98 patients with bilateral inguinal hernias underwent surgery. A polypropylene 30 x 10 cm rectangular mesh or a 30 x 10/15 cm 'slipmesh' was used. Follow-up, including a physical examination, of 96 per cent of patients was performed. RESULTS: Median operative time was 60 min. Mostly minor intraoperative complications occurred. Conversion was required for two patients. Apart from one patient with a necrotic fasciitis who died from respiratory failure, only minor postoperative complications (10 per cent) occurred. Median hospital stay was 1 (range 1-21) days. Median recuperation time was 5 (range 1-22) days. Median follow-up (96 per cent) was 32 (range 7-57) months; there were six recurrences among 34 hernias in the group of 17 patients treated with 10 x 30 cm mesh and two (1 per cent) in the group that received 30 x 10/15 cm mesh (162 hernias in 81 patients). CONCLUSION: The endoscopic approach for the Stoppa procedure for bilateral inguinal hernia repair is a reliable method with minor complications. It ensures a short recuperation time and the recurrence rate is low owing to adequate overlap of the hernial defect when a 'slipmesh' is used.     

Three-year results of a randomized clinical trial of lightweight or standard polypropylene mesh in Lichtenstein repair of primary inguinal hernia

BACKGROUND: This randomized trial examined whether lightweight (LW) polypropylene mesh (large pore size, partially absorbable) could have long-term benefits in reducing chronic pain and inflammation after inguinal hernia repair. METHODS: Six hundred men with a primary unilateral inguinal hernia were randomized to Lichtenstein repair using a standard polypropylene mesh or a LW mesh in one of six centres. The patients were blinded to which mesh they received. Clinical examination was performed and a pain questionnaire completed 3 years after surgery. RESULTS: Of the 590 men who had surgery, 243 (82.7 percent) of 294 in the standard mesh group and 251 (84.8 percent) of 296 in the LW mesh group were examined in the clinic, a median of 37 (range 30-48) months after hernia repair. There were nine recurrent hernias in each group (3.7 percent with standard mesh and 3.6 per cent with LW mesh). Patients who had LW mesh had less pain on examination, less pain on rising from lying to sitting, fewer miscellaneous groin problems and felt the mesh less often than patients with standard mesh. CONCLUSION: Use of LW mesh for Lichtenstein hernia repair did not affect recurrence rates, but improved some aspects of pain and discomfort 3 years after surgery.     

Minimal postoperative pain using properitoneal nontension sutured repair of direct inguinal hernias

BACKGROUND: Numerous repairs exist for direct inguinal hernias. These repairs are limited by the shortcomings of their respective technique. Reported recurrence rates for all currently employed hernia repairs for direct inguinal hernias range from 1% to 10%. With recurrence rates for nontension mesh repairs <2%, the evaluation of postoperative outcomes has shifted instead to that of pain and return to normal activities. METHODS: We describe a novel inexpensive technique that employs the placement of conventional properitoneal tension-free mesh for repair of direct inguinal hernia. This technique, performed as day surgery with the patient under local anaesthetic, offers the beneficial aspects of contemporary mesh repair while avoiding its limitations. RESULTS: Three-year independent follow-up of 52 patients undergoing this repair demonstrated 1 (1.9%) early failure. Postoperative pain was measured using a visual analog pain scale (0 to 10) at 2 months (mean +/- SD; 1.39 +/- .58), 1 year (.37 +/- .27), 3 years (.58 +/- .40), at work (.59 +/- .33), and with recreational activity (.73 +/- .40). More than one third of patients had returned to work 1 week after surgery (37.8%) with 62.2% returning by 2 weeks and 100% by 6 weeks. Most significantly, 90.9% of patients had resumed full recreational activities by 8 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: In addition to providing minimal recurrence, these results of our technique demonstrate that this it provides less postoperative pain than has been reported in other nontension types of repair. Furthermore, use of this procedure results in earlier return to work and full recreational activities, thus it has significant social and economic implications.