Efficacy and safety of influenza vaccination in children with asthma

The mean global prevalence of asthma among children is approximately 12%, making it the most common chronic disease in children. Influenza infection has been associated with complications such as exacerbations of wheezing and asthma, increased airway hyper-reactivity and hospitalization. Although influenza vaccination is recommended for asthmatic patients by all health authorities, vaccination coverage remains significantly lower than expected and is lowest of all in children. Compliance is affected by the uncertainty of parents and physicians concerning the clinical risk of influenza in asthmatic subjects, the benefits of influenza vaccination in preventing asthma exacerbations and the safety of immunization. The aim of this review is to analyze the rationale for using influenza vaccine, discuss the relationship between influenza and the severity of asthmatic episodes and document the efficacy and safety of influenza vaccination in the pediatric asthmatic population.     

Efficacy and safety of ketotifen in young children with asthma

Thirty children (aged 1 to 3 years) with mild to moderate asthma were entered into a 28-week double-blind, crossover study comparing the prophylactic effect of ketotifen and placebo. A patient daily diary card was used to document symptoms and concomitant medications taken during a 2-week baseline and subsequent 12-week drug/placebo period. This was followed by a 2-week washout and 12 more weeks of drug/placebo in a crossover design. Physician assessment was performed at the beginning, at the end of each period, and at 4-week intervals throughout the drug study. No significant difference was observed between ketotifen treatment and placebo treatment in any of the study parameters that were tested. A decrease in concomitant medication usage during the first treatment period with ketotifen was observed. The principle side effect of ketotifen therapy observed in this age group was weight gain. In contrast to studies in adults, no sedation was noted.     

Efficacy and safety of dry powder fluticasone propionate in children with persistent asthma.

BACKGROUND: Flovent Diskus is a powder formulation of the inhaled corticosteroid fluticasone propionate (FP) delivered via a breath-actuated, multidose inhaler. OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy and safety of dry powder FP administered once or twice daily (200 microg per day) to children with persistent asthma. METHODS: Twelve-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial with a 52-week, open-label extension. Children aged 4 to 11 were required to have pulmonary function 50% to 85% of predicted values. The population was stratified for baseline therapy (inhaled corticosteroid/cromolyn or bronchodilators only). After a 2-week placebo run-in, 242 patients received dry powder FP 200 microg each morning, dry powder FP 100 microg BID, or placebo for 12 weeks; 192 were rerandomized to the QD or BID regimen for an additional 52 weeks of open-label treatment. Primary endpoints were mean changes in FEV1 and morning PEF recorded at clinic visits. RESULTS: Both dry powder FP regimens significantly improved FEV1, evening PEF, and asthma symptoms at the double-blind phase endpoint (P < or = .017 compared with placebo). The BID regimen also significantly improved morning PEF and nighttime awakenings due to asthma (P < or = .005). Among patients previously treated with inhaled corticosteroids/cromolyn, improvements observed with the QD and BID regimens were similar. Patients switched from BID to open-label QD treatment showed additional improvements at week 52 generally comparable to patients who received the BID regimen during both phases. Fluticasone propionate was well tolerated for up to 64 weeks with few reports of drug-related adverse events or morning plasma cortisol abnormalities. CONCLUSIONS: Once daily dosing of dry powder FP 200 microg is an effective and convenient alternative for children whose asthma is controlled with a more frequent dosing regimen of inhaled corticosteroids.     

Comparison of roflumilast, an oral anti-inflammatory, with beclomethasone dipropionate in the treatment of persistent asthma

BACKGROUND: Roflumilast is an oral, once-daily phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor with anti-inflammatory activity in development for the treatment of asthma. Roflumilast was compared with inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) in patients with asthma. METHODS: In a double blind, double-dummy, randomized, noninferiority study, 499 patients (forced expiratory volume in 1 s [FEV1] = 50-85% predicted) received roflumilast 500 microg once daily or BDP 200 microg twice daily (400 microg/day) for 12 weeks. Lung function and adverse events were monitored. RESULTS: Roflumilast and BDP significantly improved FEV1 by 12% (270 +/- 30 ml) and 14% (320 +/- 30 ml), respectively (P < 0.0001 vs baseline). Roflumilast and BDP also significantly improved forced vital capacity (FVC) (P < 0.0001 vs baseline). There were no significant differences between roflumilast and BDP with regard to improvement in FEV1 and FVC. Roflumilast and BDP showed small improvements in median asthma symptom scores (-0.82 and -1.00, respectively) and reduced rescue medication use (-1.00 and -1.15 median puffs/day, respectively; P < 0.0001 vs baseline). These small differences between roflumilast and BDP were not considered clinically relevant. Both agents were well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Once daily, oral roflumilast 500 microg was comparable with inhaled twice-daily BDP (400 microg/day) in improving pulmonary function and asthma symptoms, and reducing rescue medication use in patients with asthma.     

Efficacy of anti-LT agents in the treatment of chronic asthma

Summary Anti-LT agents are the first new class of asthma medication to be approved in the last 20 yr. Current asthma treatment guidelines recommentd antileukobriene agents as anti-inflammatory therapy for patients with mild, persistent asthma. The role that these drugs will play in clinical practice will become more apparent as additional experience is gained in their use. The results of clinical studies illustrate their potential: anti-LT agents reduce asthma symptoms, improve airway function, and decrease the need for concomitant β2-agonists and inhaled corticosteroids; the incidence of asthma exacerbations may also be reduced. Finally, because these agents are administered orally, they offer the potential for improved patient compliance relative to the more complicated forms of drug administration.     

Efficacy and safety of SQ house dust mite (HDM) SLIT-tablet treatment of HDM allergic asthma

Introduction: In the treatment of house dust mite (HDM) respiratory allergic disease, allergy immunotherapy constitutes an add-on treatment option targeting the underlying immunological mechanisms of allergic disease. However, for the treatment of HDM allergic asthma, the use of subcutaneous allergy immunotherapy (SCIT) has been limited by the risk of systemic adverse events. Thus, sublingually administered allergy immunotherapy (SLIT) has been investigated as a treatment option with an improved tolerability profile that allows for safer treatment of patients with HDM allergic asthma.

Areas covered: In this Drug Profile, we provide a review of the clinical data behind the SQ HDM SLIT-tablet, which was recently approved for the treatment of HDM allergic asthma and allergic rhinitis by regulatory authorities in several European countries.

Expert commentary: The SQ HDM SLIT-tablet is the first allergy immunotherapy to be tested prospectively in patients with asthma, and to favorably modify patient relevant end points such as requirement for inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) or the time to first asthma exacerbation upon ICS reduction, suggesting that SQ HDM SLIT-tablet treatment may contribute to improving overall asthma control.     

Suppression of cytokine expression by roflumilast and dexamethasone in a model of chronic asthma

Background In a mouse model of mild chronic asthma, both inflammation and remodelling can be suppressed by dexamethasone (a glucocorticoid) and roflumilast (a selective phosphodiesterase‐4 inhibitor). Objective To better understand the underlying molecular mechanisms, we investigated the effects of treatment on airway expression of inflammation‐related cytokines, as well as on epithelial expression of growth factors. Methods BALB/c mice systemically sensitized to ovalbumin were challenged with aerosolized antigen for 6 weeks and treated with roflumilast or dexamethasone during the final 2 weeks. Expression of mRNA, for a variety of cytokines and growth factors, was assessed in selectively dissected proximal airways or in airway epithelium obtained by laser capture microdissection. Results In the airway wall of vehicle‐treated challenged animals, there was significantly elevated expression of mRNA for a variety of pro‐inflammatory and T helper type 2 cytokines, as well as for IFN‐γ. All these cytokines were suppressed by dexamethasone. Treatment with roflumilast reduced expression of IL‐17A, TNF‐α, granulocyte‐macrophage colony‐stimulating factor and IL‐6, but did not inhibit other cytokines. Both drugs suppressed the enhanced expression of mRNA for growth factors such as TGF‐β1 and FGF‐2 in airway epithelium. Conclusions Whereas dexamethasone non‐specifically inhibits numerous mediators involved in inflammation and the immune response, roflumilast selectively inhibits a subset of pro‐inflammatory cytokines and growth factors. These mediators and/or the cells that produce them may have critical roles in the pathogenesis of the lesions of chronic asthma.     

Efficacy and safety of desloratadine in the treatment of perennial allergic rhinitis

BACKGROUND: The evidence base for the use of H1-antihistamines in the treatment of perennial allergic rhinitis is considerably smaller than it is in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis. OBJECTIVE: We hypothesized that desloratadine, a new, nonsedating selective H1-antihistamine, would be efficacious and safe in the treatment of perennial allergic rhinitis. METHODS: In a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel-group study, 676 patients with symptomatic perennial allergic rhinitis were randomly assigned to 4 weeks of treatment with either 5 mg of desloratadine once daily or placebo. Efficacy was assessed by using a morning-evening instantaneous total symptom score (TSS), which was composed of scores for 4 individual nasal symptoms (rhinorrhea, itching, sneezing, and postnasal drip) and 3 individual nonnasal symptoms (itching eyes, watering eyes, and itching of the ears or palate). Secondary outcome measures included a morning-evening reflective TSS, total nasal and nonnasal symptoms scores, and individual symptom scores. Safety evaluations, including 12-lead electrocardiograms, were performed. RESULTS: Six hundred thirty-four patients completed the study. Desloratadine consistently diminished perennial allergic rhinitis symptoms, reducing the morning-evening instantaneous TSS (P =.005), the morning-evening reflective TSS (P =.007), the morning-evening reflective total nonnasal score (P =.023), and the individual nasal symptom scores for rhinorrhea, nasal itching, sneezing, and postnasal drip/drainage (P =.05 to P =.013) during weeks 1 through 4. Improvement in symptoms was observed after the first dose. Dropouts, and the type and frequency of adverse events (headache, viral infection, pharyngitis, and upper respiratory tract infection), were similar in both treatment groups. No clinically significant changes in QTc intervals were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Desloratadine rapidly and safely reduced the symptoms of perennial allergic rhinitis, and its efficacy did not diminish during 4 weeks of treatment.     

Efficacy and safety of nabumetone in long-term treatment of osteoarthritis

Nabumetone, belonging to a new class of anti-inflammatory drugs, was administered to 9 patients suffering from radiologically-confirmed osteoarthritis of one or more of the following articulations: knees, hips, cervical and lumbar spine. A single nightly dose of 1 g was given for at least one year, and up to three years. The drug was found to be generally effective on such criteria as articular mobility, night pain, and pain during activity. No significant alterations which could be attributed to the treatment were seen in haematological parameters, blood creatinine and urea levels, protein, transaminases, alkaline phosphatase, gamma-glutamyl transferase and other blood and urine tests. The side-effects claimed by the patients included gastric upset, pyrosis, epigastric pain, constipation, malleolar oedema and drowsiness. These complaints did not lead to termination of the treatment. The efficacy and safety of nabumetone found in this and other studies warrant its further investigation in the treatment of rheumatic diseases.     

Efficacy and safety of cerivastatin and pravastatin in the treatment of primary hypercholesterolemia

In this randomized, double-blind, parallel group study, the efficacy and safety of cerivastatin (0.3 mg) and pravastatin (20 mg) were compared in 402 patients with primary hypercholesterolemia with and without documented coronary heart disease or peripheral vascular disease. After 8 weeks of treatment, cerivastatin provided significantly greater reductions than pravastatin in low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol (31.1% vs. 26.0%; p < 0.0001) and total cholesterol (21.1% vs. 17.8%; p < 0.0001). A greater proportion of patients treated with cerivastatin than pravastatin achieved > 30% and > 40% reductions from baseline in LDL-cholesterol. Both agents also increased high density lipoprotein-cholesterol and reduced triglycerides. Overall, 65.1% of patients treated with cerivastatin and 63.3% of patients with pravastatin achieved LDL-cholesterol goals defined by the National Cholesterol Education Program. Both drugs were well tolerated, with most adverse events being mild. These results demonstrate that cerivastatin (0.3 mg) is a highly effective 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase inhibitor, which enables a large proportion of patients to achieve clinically meaningful reductions in LDL-cholesterol.     

Efficacy and safety of fluticasone propionate 44 microg/salmeterol 21 microg administered in a hydrofluoroalkane metered-dose inhaler as an initial asthma maintenance treatment.

BACKGROUND: We wanted to evaluate whether treatment with an inhaled corticosteroid and an inhaled long-acting beta2-agonist is more effective than an inhaled corticosteroid alone for patients using as-needed albuterol who are initiating maintenance treatment. OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of twice-daily fluticasone propionate (FP) 88 microg and salmeterol 42 microg combined in a chlorofluorocarbon (CFC)-free (hydrofluoroalkane 134a) metered-dose inhaler (MDI) with the individual agents alone, each delivered through an MDI containing CFC propellants, in patient with persistent asthma previously uncontrolled with as-needed short-acting beta2-agonists alone. METHODS: Patients with asthma (n = 283) were randomized to twice-daily treatment for 12 weeks with FP 88 microg combined with salmeterol 42 microg (FSC) in a CFC-free MDI or the individual components alone from CFC-containing MDIs. RESULTS: At endpoint, mean change from baseline in morning predose forced expiratory volume in 1 second was significantly (P < or = 0.016) greater with FSC (0.69 L) compared with FP (0.51 L) or salmeterol (0.47 L). Fewer patients treated with FSC withdrew due to worsening asthma (1%) compared with FP (3%) or salmeterol (8%; P = 0.024). FSC significantly increased (P < or = 0.002) morning and evening peak expiratory flow rate at endpoint (66.5 and 51.5 L/min, respectively) compared with FP (43.0 and 29.9 L/min, respectively) and salmeterol (29.2 and 21.6 L/min, respectively). In addition, asthma symptom scores were reduced, and percentages of days with no asthma symptoms increased in all treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with FSC in a CFC-free MDI is more effective than FP or salmeterol alone in asthma patients who are symptomatic taking short-acting beta2-agonists alone.     

Efficacy and safety of sublingual immunotherapy.

OBJECTIVE: To review the available published data concerning the use of sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) in respiratory allergy to primarily evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of the treatment and to secondarily consider the mechanisms of action and any unresolved questions. DATA SOURCES: Articles in the medical literature (starting from 1986 up to November 2003) derived from searching the MEDLINE database with the keywords sublingual immunotherapy, respiratory allergy, asthma, and rhinitis. Sources included review articles, randomized controlled clinical trials, postmarketing surveillance studies, and relevant reports from meeting proceedings. STUDY SELECTION: Articles concerning safety, efficacy, and mechanisms of SLIT published in English-language, peer-reviewed journals. RESULTS: SLIT proved effective and safe in adults and children. As with traditional subcutaneous immunotherapy, SLIT has long-lasting efficacy and a preventive effect on new sensitizations. CONCLUSION: SLIT is a viable alternative to subcutaneous immunotherapy. Its use in pediatric patients seems to be particularly promising.     

Efficacy and safety of reslizumab in the treatment of eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis

BackgroundEosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA), a rare vasculitis with substantial morbidity, is characterized by asthma, eosinophilia, sinusitis, pulmonary infiltrates, neuropathy, positivity for antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody, and multiorgan vasculitis. Although treatment options previously included corticosteroids and immunosuppressants, anti–interleukin 5 therapies have gained interest in EGPA treatment. Mepolizumab was approved for and recently benralizumab was found to have safety and efficacy in EGPA.ObjectiveTo determine the safety and efficacy of reslizumab in EGPA.MethodsIn this open-label, pilot study, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of intravenous reslizumab (3 mg/kg) in EGPA in 10 subjects. Oral corticosteroid dose, adverse events, exacerbations, symptom control, disease activity, blood markers, and lung function were evaluated before, during, and after 7 monthly reslizumab treatments.ResultsReslizumab was tolerated and resulted in a significant reduction in daily oral corticosteroid (P < .05). Of the 10 subjects, 3 experienced an EGPA exacerbation during the treatment. One had a severe adverse event, requiring removal from the study.ConclusionYielding similar results to other anti–interleukin 5 biologic medications, reslizumab is generally a safe and effective treatment for EGPA that warrants further study.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02947945.     

Efficacy and safety of Org OD 14 in the treatment of climacteric complaints

To study the effect of Org OD 14 [17 alpha, 17 alpha)-17-hydroxy-7-methyl-19-norpregn-5(10)-en-20-yn-3-one) on the endometrium, 9 healthy post-menopausal women were given a daily dose of 2.5 mg of Org OD 14 for 100 consecutive days. In addition, during days 91-100 a daily oral dose of 1 mg of lynestrenol was taken by each volunteer. Endometrial biopsies were obtained before the start of treatment and on day 91. At pre-treatment, the endometrium was atrophic in 7 out of 9 volunteers and weakly stimulated in 2 volunteers. On day 91, the endometrium was found atrophic in 8 out of 9 volunteers and weakly stimulated in 1. Breakthrough bleeding occurred in 1 volunteer. After cessation of the combined treatment with Org OD 14 and lynestrenol, withdrawal bleeding occurred only in 1 volunteer. To assess the efficacy of Org OD 14 in the treatment of climacteric complaints a double-blind cross-over study was performed in 29 post-menopausal women. Patients were randomly allocated to Org OD 14 or to placebo as first treatment. Each period of treatment lasted 4 mth; no wash-out period was introduced. Patients took 1 Org OD 14 tablet (2.5 mg) or 1 placebo tablet per day. The patients scored hot flushes and sweating. At the end of the second treatment period, each patient was asked which of the 2 treatments she preferred. Data sufficient to allow for a conclusion were obtained from 20 patients.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Efficacy and safety of loratadine plus pseudoephedrine in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis and mild asthma

Background: Antihistamines have been shown to have a variety of therapeutic effects in asthma. Although nasal obstruction may play an important role in modulating lower airway function, no prior trial has used a decongestant in combination with an antihistamine in patients with allergic rhinitis and concomitant asthma.Objective: We sought to determine the efficacy and safety of loratadine (5 mg) plus pseudoephedrine (120 mg) (L/P) twice daily in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis and mild asthma.Methods: We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of L/P in 193 subjects during the fall allergy season. Nasal and chest symptoms, albuterol use, and peak expiratory flow rates were recorded daily for 6 weeks. Spirometry was measured at baseline and after 1, 2, 4, and 6 weeks of therapy, and health-related quality of life was rated at the beginning and end of the study.Results: Total rhinitis and asthma symptom severity scores were significantly reduced in patients receiving active therapy compared with those receiving placebo throughout the 6-week study. Peak expiratory flow rates improved significantly in patients treated with L/P during weeks 2 through 6 (peak effect [mean ± SEM]: L/P, 26.23 ± 4.64 L/min vs placebo, 8.52 ± 3.53 L/min, p = 0.002) as did FEV₁ (peak effect [mean ± SEM]: L/P, 170 ± 53 ml vs placebo, 20 ± 40 ml, p = 0.01) at all clinic visits. In addition, select measures of asthma-specific quality of life improved significantly relative to placebo.Conclusions: L/P significantly improved nasal and asthma symptoms, pulmonary function, and quality of life in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis and concomitant mild asthma. (J Allergy Clin Immunol 1997;100:781-8)     

The phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor roflumilast is effective in the treatment of allergic rhinitis

BACKGROUND: The beneficial effects of phosphodiesterase 4 (PDE4) inhibitors in allergic asthma have been shown in previous preclinical and clinical studies. Because allergic rhinitis and asthma share several epidemiologic and pathophysiologic factors, PDE4 inhibitors might also be effective in allergic rhinitis. OBJECTIVE: The main objective of this study was to investigate the efficacy of oral roflumilast (500 microg/day) in allergic rhinitis. METHODS: In a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded, crossover study, 25 subjects (16 male, 9 female; median age, 28 years) with histories of allergic rhinitis but asymptomatic at screening received roflumilast (500 microg once daily) and placebo for 9 days each with a washout period of at least 14 days in between treatment periods. In each of the treatment periods, controlled intranasal allergen provocation with pollen extracts was performed daily beginning the third day of treatment, each time approximately 2 hours after study drug administration. Five and 30 minutes after each allergen provocation, rhinal airflow was measured by means of anterior rhinomanometry and the subjective symptoms obstruction, itching, and rhinorrhea were assessed by means of a standardized visual analog scale. RESULTS: Rhinal airflow improved almost consistently during the 9 days of roflumilast treatment, and it was significantly higher at study day 9 on roflumilast in comparison with placebo, a result also found for itching and rhinorrhea. With respect to the subjective obstruction score, a significant difference in comparison with placebo could be demonstrated within 4 days. CONCLUSION: This study shows that a PDE4 inhibitor, roflumilast, effectively controls symptoms of allergic rhinitis. Thus PDE4 inhibitors might be a future treatment option not only in allergic asthma but also in allergic rhinitis or the combination of the 2 diseases.     

Country-based report: the safety of omalizumab treatment in pregnant patients with asthma

Background/aimWe aimed to report outcomes of pregnant patients with asthma under omalizumab treatment and their infants in our country.Materials and methodsPatients with asthma who received omalizumab for at least 6 months and at least one dose during their pregnancy were retrospectively evaluated using a questionnaire regarding their disease and therapy and the health of their infants.Results Twenty pregnant patients and their 23 infant’s data were analyzed. The mean delivery age was 31.8 ± 7.4 years. They received omalizumab for 28.9 ± 21.8 months. Eight (36.4%) patients showed exacerbation of the disease during pregnancy. Forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) and asthma control test (ACT) scores at the starting time of omalizumab administration, first month of the pregnancy, and after delivery were 71 ± 18%, 83.4 ± 10.5%, and 80.5 ± 13% (FEV1), and 11.9 ± 4.9, 20.2 ± 2.6, and 20.4 ± 2.2 (ACT), respectively. One patient gave birth to twin infants, two patients to two infants each in different years, and 17 to one infant each. Three (13%) infants had low birth weight and five (21.7%) were born prematurely. No congenital anomalies were detected. Seven (30.4%) infants presented atopic diseases during their life.Conclusion Omalizumab treatment during pregnancy seems to be safe for both patients and their infants.     

Efficacy and safety of loratadine suspension in the treatment of children with allergic rhinitis

The safety and efficacy of loratadine was compared with that of dexchlorpheniramine in children with allergic rhinitis. Twenty-one children received loratadine 0.11-0.24 mg/kg ideal body weight once daily and 19 dexchlorpheniramine 0.10-0.23 mg/kg every 8 h (0.30-0.69 mg/24 h) for 14 consecutive days. Both loratadine and dexchlorpheniramine were effective in reducing nasal and ocular symptoms in allergic children. Substantial improvement in allergy symptoms was observed at the first evaluation (day 3 of treatment) and was maintained for the study duration. No significant trend of abnormality in laboratory parameters was observed. Drowsiness was present only in the dexchlorpheniramine-treated group. Loratadine appears to be a simple, effective and safe therapy for seasonal allergic rhinitis.