Influence of combinations of acetylsalicylic acid, acetaminophen, and diclofenac on platelet aggregation

Acetylsalicylic acid (aspirin) is often given together with other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and acetaminophen. The latter have been accused in epidemiologic studies to cause an increased cardiovascular risk. We have, therefore, analysed the influence of various such drug combinations on platelet aggregation in vitro. Citrated blood was incubated with either 25 microg/ml acetaminophen, 0.5 microg/ml aspirin, 0.04 microg/ml diclofenac, or buffer; followed by a second of the above-mentioned solutions. After a 20 min incubation, platelet aggregation was assessed with a platelet function analyser (PFA-100), which measures the pore closure time (CT) by aggregating platelets. The length of CT reflects the degree of platelet inhibition. Acetaminophen alone did not affect platelet aggregation. Aspirin and diclofenac both increased CT (184+/-69 s, P<0.01 and 196+/-54 s, P<0.001; control 120+/-13 s). Combinations of either aspirin and diclofenac, aspirin and acetaminophen, or diclofenac and acetaminophen increased CT further (290+/-22 s, 281+/-36 s, 288+/-25 s, respectively, P<0.001). The time sequence of drug application was important: when diclofenac or acetaminophen was added before aspirin, platelet aggregation was less inhibited than when given in opposite order, i.e. aspirin prior to diclofenac or acetaminophen. We conclude that acetaminophen by itself does not affect platelet aggregation, but potentiates the antiaggregatory effect of aspirin or diclofenac. Aspirin given before acetaminophen or diclofenac had a more potent antiaggregatory effect than vice versa. These observations may have clinical implications.     

Zidovudine, diclofenac and ketoprofen pharmacokinetic interactions in rats

Zidovudine (AZT) is widely used for the management of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infections. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are often used for relief of non-specific fever and musculoskeletal pain in patients with HIV including those with AZT-induced myopathy. The effects of single oral doses of diclofenac and ketoprofen on AZT pharmacokinetics were studied in rats. The influence of AZT on the pharmacokinetics of diclofenac or ketoprofen was also investigated. The administration of diclofenac (3 mgkg(-1)) or ketoprofen (1 mgkg(-1)) did not significantly alter AZT (1.5 mgkg(-1)) pharmacokinetic parameters compared with administering AZT alone. There was no significant difference between the pharmacokinetics of ketoprofen given alone or in combination with AZT. However, the co-administration of AZT with diclofenac affected the pharmacokinetics of diclofenac. The Cmax of diclofenac was significantly (P < 0.05) increased by approximately threefold within a shorter time (0.6+/-0.2 h). The mean AUC value for diclofenac was increased from 2.29 to 5.04 microg mL(-1) h in the presence of AZT. AZT decreased the mean apparent clearance of diclofenac by 54%. The increase in diclofenac concentrations could be attributed to a decrease in its clearance or delay in its metabolite formation due to a competitive effect. The results show that diclofenac and AZT should be given with caution because of the possible increase of diclofenac toxicity, in anticipation of follow-up clinical studies to examine this finding in man. AZT and ketoprofen could be a safe combination since no pharmacokinetic interaction was detected.     

Warfarin and aspirin give more benefit than aspirin alone but also more bleeding after myocardial infarction

The anticoagulant, warfarin, and the antiplatelet agent, aspirin, have been shown to have similar benefits after myocardial infarction. As these agents have different mechanisms of action, the beneficial effects of warfarin and aspirin may be additive after myocardial infarction. In the Warfarin, Aspirin, Reinfarction Study (WARIS II), the main outcome was a composite of death, non-fatal reinfarction or thromboembolic stroke, whichever came first over 4 years. Compared to aspirin alone (160 mg/day), the risk reduction was 19% (p = 0.03) with warfarin alone (INR of 2.8 IU) and 29% (p = 0.001) with the combination of aspirin and warfarin (aspirin, 75 mg/day; warfarin, INR of 2.2 IU). This difference in the first event with warfarin alone or the combination, represented a reduction in reinfarction and thromboembolic stroke rather than death. For reinfarction, compared to aspirin alone (117 of 1206), there was a reduction with warfarin alone (90 of 1216) and a further reduction with the combination (69 of 1208). For thromboembolic stroke, compared to aspirin (32 of 1206), there were similar reductions with warfarin and the combination. There were more major and minor bleeding in the warfarin groups than the aspirin group, with major bleeding occurring in 8, 33 and 28 patients taking aspirin, warfarin and aspirin and warfarin, respectively. In conclusion, as compared with aspirin alone, therapy with moderate-intensity warfarin combined with aspirin and high-intensity warfarin alone, resulted in a reduced risk of reinfarction and ischemic stroke but a higher risk of bleeding.     

Losartan attenuates the antimigratory effect of diclofenac in spontaneously hypertensive rats

Many patients with hypertension, particularly elderly patients, take nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and antihypertensive agents. However, few studies describe the effect of the association of antihypertensive agents with NSAIDs on inflammatory response in hypertension. To investigate this, spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHRs) were treated with either diclofenac alone or diclofenac combined with losartan (an AT1 angiotensin II antagonist). The leukocyte-endothelial interaction was then observed using intravital microscopy. Blood pressure of SHR (169.6+/-3.6) was increased by diclofenac (186.4+/-2.9), reduced by losartan (152.6+/-3.5), and reduced by the combination of the 2 (158.9+/-3.7). All the treatments tested reduced the number of rollers, adherent and migrated leukocytes, and the expression of endothelial intercellular adhesion molecule-1 and P-selectin. The association of losartan reduced the effect of diclofenac on leukocyte migration. Neither treatment tested increased the venular shear rate or modified the venular diameters, number of circulating leukocytes, and L-selectin expression on granulocytes. The reduction of CD11/CD18 expression induced by diclofenac alone was hindered by losartan. A pharmacokinetic interference between losartan and diclofenac was ruled out since no significant differences were observed in the plasma concentrations of each drug when they were associated. In conclusion, although diclofenac does not interfere with the losartan antihypertensive effect, losartan attenuates the effect of diclofenac has on leukocyte behavior and expression of adhesion molecules. Losartan has an antimigratory effect, reducing leukocyte migration by reducing ICAM-1 and P-selectin expression. Losartan may hinder the full expression of the antimigratory effect of diclofenac.     

Enoxaparin and dalteparin in unstable angina: new indication. Enoxaparin: a reference treatment. Dalteparin: no better than unfractionated heparin

(1) Enoxaparin and dalteparin are the only low-molecular-weight heparins so far approved for the treatment of unstable angina and non Q-wave myocardial infarction. (2) In two trials involving over 7,000 patients with unstable angina or non Q-wave myocardial infarction, the enoxaparin + aspirin combination was more effective than the unfractionated heparin + aspirin combination in reducing the risk of death, myocardial infarction or angina relapse. (3) In the same indication another trial showed no significant difference between the dalteparin + aspirin combination and the unfractionated heparin + aspirin combination on the basis of the same end point. (4) The dose must be calculated precisely according to bodyweight, as there is a severe risk of bleeding if the recommended dose is exceeded. (5) Continued enoxaparin therapy after clinical stabilisation has no supplementary benefit compared with aspirin alone.     

Grapefruit juice potentiates the anti-inflammatory effects of diclofenac on the carrageenan-induced rat's paw oedema.

The anti-inflammatory effect of diclofenac alone or in combination with double strength grapefruit juice was investigated on carrageenan-induced rat's paw oedema. Paw was measured by using a plethysmometer 3 h after injecting the phlogestic agent. There was significant inhibition (P< 0.05) of the oedematous response after oral administration of diclofenac alone (1, 2.5, 5 mg kg(-1)p.o.) in a dose-dependent manner. Coadministration of grapefruit juice (10 ml kg(-1)p.o.) orally with all doses of diclofenac, enhanced the inhibitory effect of diclofenac on rat's paw oedema. Double-strength grapefruit juice has synergistic inhibitory effect on rat's paw oedema when administered in combination with diclofenac.     

Diclofenac in rheumatoid disease.

The clinical activity and side effects of a new phenyl acetic-acid derivative, diclofenac, have been assessed in 24 patients with rheumatoid disease. Diclofenac 25 mg q.i.d. was compared with 750mg of aspirin BP q.i.d. using a double-blind crossover technique involving four weeks on each drug. Benefits were similar for the two preparations but with improvement in morning stiffness and incidence of dyspepsia favouring diclofenac, and a more marked reduction of the sedimentation rate occurring with aspirin. A moderate elevation of liver enzymes was seen in one patient on diclofenac, and of lactate dehydrogenase in one other. It is concluded that diclofenac is a therapeutically active analgesic anti-inflammatory agent.     

阿司匹林联合双嘧达莫用于缺血性脑卒中二级预防的Meta分析

目的以阿司匹林为对照组,系统评价阿司匹林双嘧达莫联合用药,对缺血性脑卒中二级预防的有效性和安全性。方法通过卒中、非致死性卒中、各种原因引起的死亡及非致死性卒中与各种原因引起的死亡联合事件发生的相对危险度,分析联合用药的有效性,通过出血性并发症及脑出血发生的相对危险度,分析联合用药的安全性。结果 a.与阿司匹林相比较,联合用药能更有效的预防卒中的发生(RR=0.86 95%CI[0.74,1.00]),使非致死性卒中的发生率降低22%(RR=0.78 95%CI[0.67,0.90]),也能明显降低非致死性卒中与各种原因引起的死亡联合事件的发生率(RR=0.87 95%CI[0.79,0.96])。但是,联合用药对各种原因引起的死亡无效(RR=0.98,95%CI[0.85,1.13])。b.与阿司匹林相比较,联合用药不会增加出血性并发症的发生率(RR=0.95,95%CI[0.80,1.12]),但可以使脑出血的发生率增加14%(RR=1.14,95%CI[0.54,2.42]),尽管这一结果无明显统计学意义。结论与阿司匹林相比较,联合用药对卒中、非致死性卒中及非致死性卒中与各种原因引起的死亡联合事件的预防更有效,联合用药不会增加出血性并发症的发生率,但能轻微增加脑出血的发生率。     

Ximelagatran,an oral direct thrombin inhibitor,has a low potential for cytochrome P450-mediated drug-drug interactions

BACKGROUND: Ximelagatran is an oral direct thrombin inhibitor currently in clinical development for the prevention and treatment of thromboembolic disorders. After oral administration, ximelagatran is rapidly absorbed and extensively bioconverted, via two intermediates (ethyl-melagatran and hydroxy-melagatran), to its active form, melagatran. In vitro studies have shown no evidence for involvement of cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes in either the bioactivation or the elimination of melagatran. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the potential of ximelagatran, the intermediates ethyl-melagatran and hydroxy-melagatran, and melagatran to inhibit the CYP system in vitro and in vivo, and the influence of three CYP substrates on the pharmacokinetics of melagatran in vivo. METHODS: The CYP inhibitory properties of ximelagatran, the intermediates and melagatran were tested in vitro by two different methods, using heterologously expressed enzymes or human liver microsomes. Diclofenac (CYP2C9), diazepam (CYP2C19) and nifedipine (CYP3A4) were chosen for coadministration with ximelagatran in healthy volunteers. Subjects received oral ximelagatran 24mg and/or diclofenac 50mg, a 10-minute intravenous infusion of diazepam 0.1 mg/kg, or nifedipine 60mg. The plasma pharmacokinetics of melagatran, diclofenac, diazepam, N-desmethyl-diazepam and nifedipine were determined when administered alone and in combination with ximelagatran. RESULTS: No inhibition, or only minor inhibition, of CYP enzymes by ximelagatran, the intermediates or melagatran was shown in the in vitro studies, suggesting that ximelagatran would not cause CYP-mediated drug-drug interactions in vivo. This result was confirmed in the clinical studies. There were no statistically significant differences in the pharmacokinetics of diclofenac, diazepam and nifedipine on coadministration with ximelagatran. Moreover, there were no statistically significant differences in the pharmacokinetics of melagatran when ximelagatran was administered alone or in combination with diclofenac, diazepam or nifedipine. CONCLUSION: As ximelagatran did not exert a significant effect on the hepatic CYP isoenzymes responsible for the metabolism of diclofenac, diazepam and nifedipine, it is reasonable to expect that it would have no effect on the metabolism of other drugs metabolised by these isoenzymes. Furthermore, the pharmacokinetics of melagatran after oral administration of ximelagatran are not expected to be altered by inhibition or induction of CYP2C9, CYP2C19 or CYP3A4. Together, the in vitro and in vivo studies indicate that metabolic drug-drug interactions involving the major human CYP enzymes should not be expected with ximelagatran.     

Improvement of the gastric tolerance of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs by polyene phosphatidylcholine (Phospholipon 100)

The effect of co-administration with polyene phosphatidylcholine (Phospholipon 100) on the oral gastrotoxicity of various non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) was studied in the rat. The highly unsaturated phospholipid reduced gastric mucosal lesions measured 3.5 h after oral administration of aspirin, indomethacin, phenylbutazone, diclofenac, piroxicam and sudoxicam to rats which had received a 3 day bread diet followed by 24 h fasting. The extent of reduction of gastrotoxicity varied amongst the individual NSAIDs. Phospholipon 100 also reduced gastric lesions induced by 3 day oral piroxicam and diclofenac administration. A trend towards reduction of oral diclofenac gastrotoxicity was observed following intravenous Phospholipon 100 administration. Phospholipon 100 H (100% saturated phosphatidylcholine) was less effective than Phospholipon 100 in improving acute gastric tolerance to oral phenylbutazone, diclofenac and piroxicam. Administration of the NSAID-Phospholipon 100 combination produced little change in the anti-inflammatory activities of diclofenac on carrageenan paw oedema and diclofenac and piroxicam on adjuvant arthritis in the rat. Combination with Phospholipon 100 offers a novel means for reducing the gastric side-effects of NSAID therapy.     

Clopidogrel: a pharmacoeconomic review of its use in patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes

Clopidogrel (Plavix) is a selective inhibitor of adenosine diphosphate-induced platelet aggregation. In patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) [unstable angina or non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction], clopidogrel plus aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid) for up to 1 year significantly reduced the risk of cardiovascular events relative to placebo plus aspirin in the well designed clinical trial CURE (Clopidogrel in Unstable angina to prevent Recurrent Events) and its substudy in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) [PCI-CURE]. In pharmacoeconomic evaluations based on data from these trials conducted in a number of countries that used a variety of models, methods and/or type of costs, clopidogrel plus aspirin was consistently predicted to be cost effective relative to aspirin alone in the management of patients with ACS, including those undergoing PCI. Clopidogrel plus aspirin in patients with ACS reduced the incremental cost per cardiovascular event prevented and/or life-year gained (LYG) relative to aspirin alone in analyses using within-trial data (including longer-term analyses incorporating life-expectancy estimates) from the CURE or PCI-CURE studies. In Markov models of cost effectiveness with a lifetime horizon from a healthcare payer perspective based on the CURE trial, relative to aspirin alone, clopidogrel plus aspirin for 1 year was predicted to have incremental costs per LYG of 8132Euro in Spain (2003 values) and 1365Euro in Sweden (2000 values). In similar Swedish analyses from a healthcare payer perspective, clopidogrel plus aspirin for 1 year was predicted to have incremental costs per LYG of 10,993Euro (2004 values) relative to aspirin alone based on data from the PCI-CURE substudy. Broadly similar results have also been reported in modelled analyses from other countries. Cost-utility analyses based on the CURE trial suggest that, relative to lifelong aspirin alone, clopidogrel plus aspirin for 1 year followed by aspirin alone is associated with incremental costs per QALY gained that are below the traditional threshold of cost utility in Spain, the UK and the US. In patients with ACS, including those undergoing PCI, the addition of clopidogrel to standard therapy with aspirin is clinically effective in preventing cardiovascular events. Available pharmacoeconomic data from several countries, despite some inherent limitations, support the use of clopidogrel plus aspirin for up to 1 year as a cost-effective treatment relative to aspirin alone in this patient population.     

A study of the effect of aspirin on the pharmacokinetics of oral and intravenous diclofenac sodium

Summary Previous studies have shown that aspirin interacts with orally administered diclofenac sodium, causing reduced peak concentrations, lower levels and decreased areas under curves. In this study, diclofenac sodium was administered orally and intravenously with and without aspirin, to 6 healthy female volunteers. After intravenous dosing both plasma levels and areas under curves were significantly reduced although none of the rate constants was affected. The volume of distribution of diclofenac was increased as was the plasma clearance. Oral administration with aspirin also resulted in lower plasma levels, particularly peak levels, and areas under curves. Comparison of AUC's for both modes of administration with and without aspirin suggested that lower levels after oral administration were not due to impaired absorption. These observations are best explained by decreased protein binding and increased biliary excretion of diclofenac in the presence of salicylate.     

Effects of ibuprofen on the magnitude and duration of aspirin's inhibition of platelet aggregation: clinical consequences in stroke prophylaxis

This study was designed to measure the magnitude and duration of inhibition of platelet aggregation following doses of aspirin or ibuprofen alone or taken in combination in a group of healthy volunteers. Ten normal volunteer subjects underwent 3 randomized treatment sessions: aspirin 325 mg alone, ibuprofen 400 mg alone, and ibuprofen 400 mg, followed by dosing with aspirin 325 mg 2 hours thereafter. In addition, a confirmatory study was performed in patients. Over 27 months, a cohort of patients treated with aspirin for secondary stroke prophylaxis while concomitantly taking a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) was identified. A significant reduction was found in both the magnitude and duration of aspirin's inhibitory effect on platelet aggregation when ibuprofen was given prior to aspirin administration in normal volunteer subjects. During a 27-month period, a cohort of 28 patients took regular daily doses of ibuprofen or naproxen. Of these 28 patients, 18 returned for follow-up testing in the absence of this pharmacodynamic interaction. None of these 18 patients demonstrated inhibition of platelet aggregation while on both NSAID and aspirin; however, all showed inhibition of aggregation following discontinuation of the NSAID. Notably, 13 of these 18 patients (72%) had experienced a recurrent ischemic episode while taking aspirin and NSAIDs concomitantly. These data suggest that ibuprofen prevents the irreversible inhibition of platelet aggregation produced by aspirin needed for secondary stroke prophylaxis, and this interaction can have clinical consequences for patients taking aspirin.     

Diclofenac sodium

The pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy, adverse effects, and dosage of diclofenac sodium are reviewed. Diclofenac, the first nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agent (NSAID) to be approved that is a phenylacetic acid derivative, competes with arachidonic acid for binding to cyclo-oxygenase, resulting in decreased formation of prostaglandins. The drug has both analgesic and antipyretic activities. Diclofenac is efficiently absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract; peak plasma concentrations occur 1.5 to 2.0 hours after ingestion in fasting subjects. Even though diclofenac has a relatively short elimination half-life in plasma (1.5 hours), it persists in synovial fluid. The drug is metabolized in the liver and is eliminated by urinary and biliary excretion. In clinical trials, diclofenac was as effective as aspirin, diflunisal, indomethacin, sulindac, ibuprofen, ketoprofen, and naproxen in improving function and reducing pain in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. For treatment of osteoarthritis, diclofenac was equivalent in efficacy to aspirin, diflunisal, indomethacin, sulindac, ibuprofen, ketoprofen, naproxen, flurbiprofen, mefenamic acid, and piroxicam. Diclofenac was as effective as indomethacin or sulindac in treating ankylosing spondylitis. The most frequent adverse effects reported for diclofenac were gastrointestinal, but these effects were fewer and less serious than occurred with aspirin or indomethacin; in addition, diclofenac caused fewer central nervous system reactions than indomethacin. Diclofenac is administered in divided doses with meals. The recommended total daily dosage is 100 to 150 mg (osteoarthritis and ankylosing spondylitis) or 150 to 200 mg (rheumatoid arthritis). Diclofenac is effective, but no more so than other NSAIDs. It is structurally distinct and offers another choice in the treatment of rheumatological conditions.     

小剂量尿激酶治疗不稳定心绞痛30例临床观察

目的 :观察小剂量尿激酶 (UK)与肝素和阿斯匹林联合治疗不稳定心绞痛 (U A)的临床疗效。方法 :采用单盲、随机方法。U K组按 u K2 5万 IU于 12 0 m in内静脉滴入 ,连续用 5 d。结果 :30 d的心脏死亡率两组间无显著性差异 (3.3%与 2 .9%,P>0 .0 5 ) ;急性心肌梗死 (AMI)发生率小剂量 U K组低于对照组 (3.3%与 19.6 %,P<0 .0 5 ) ,减少频发心绞痛发生率。小剂量 UK组明显优于对照组 (第 1周 :2 0 %与 47.1%,P<0 .0 1;第 4周 :6 .7%与 2 5 %,P<0 .0 5 )。结论 :小剂量 UK与肝素和阿司匹林联合应用治疗发病急重的 U A可明显降低 AMI和心绞痛的发生率。     

Antiplatelet therapy for the prevention of recurrent stroke and other serious vascular events: a review of the clinical trial data and guidelines

ABSTRACT

Background: One strategy of reducing the burden of stroke is the prevention of recurrent stroke, following an initial ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA) of arterial origin, by means of antiplatelet therapy.

Scope: This review article surveys and discusses the current clinical trial data and guidelines for the use of antiplatelet therapy in the prevention of recurrent stroke/TIA of arterial origin (not stroke due to atrial fibrillation). Based on the latest available evidence, a new antiplatelet treatment algorithm for the long-term treatment of patients following atherothromboembolic ischaemic stroke or TIA is proposed.

Findings: Meta-analyses of randomised clinical trials in patients with TIA and ischaemic stroke of arterial origin indicate that, compared with control, the relative risk reduction (RRR) for recurrent stroke and other serious vascular events is 13% (95% confidence interval [CI] 6% to 19%) with aspirin, 13% (4% to 21%; p = 0.046) with dipyridamole and 34% (24% to 43%) with the combination of aspirin and dipyridamole. Compared with aspirin, the relative risk of recurrent stroke and other serious vascular events is reduced by 7.3% (95% CI –5.7% to 18.7%) with clopidogrel and 18% (9% to 26%; p = 0.0003) with the combination of aspirin and dipyridamole. The combination of aspirin and clopidogrel is not significantly more effective in preventing serious vascular events than clopidogrel alone (RRR 6.4%; –4.6% to 16.3%) in the long-term treatment of patients with previous ischaemic stroke and TIA, mainly because of a cumulative excess of bleeding complications. The relative risks and benefits of long-term treatment with clopidogrel and the combination of aspirin and dipyridamole are being compared in an ongoing large clinical trial (PRoFESS). Current Australian therapeutic guidelines for antiplatelet therapy among patients with TIA and ischaemic stroke of arterial origin have incorporated important new findings from recently published clinical trials and recommend aspirin or the combination of dipyridamole plus aspirin as the preferred long-term antiplatelet therapy.

Conclusion: Whilst awaiting the results of the PRoFESS trial, the combination of dipyridamole plus aspirin is the preferred antiplatelet regimen to reduce the risk of recurrent vascular events among patients with TIA and ischaemic stroke of arterial origin.     

Enalapril interferes with the effect of diclofenac on leucocyte-endothelium interaction in hypertensive rats

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are known to attenuate the effects of some antihypertensive agents. However, the effect these drugs have on leukocyte migration when combined with antihypertensive agents has not been studied. To investigate this effect, we treated spontaneously hypertensive rats with saline, diclofenac, enalapril, or diclofenac combined with enalapril and observed leukocyte-endothelium interaction. Blood pressure was increased by diclofenac, reduced by enalapril and reduced by the combination of the two. Diclofenac did not interfere with the blood pressure-lowering effect of enalapril. Internal spermatic fascia venules were observed using intravital microscopy. Diclofenac reduced rollers, whereas enalapril, alone or combined with diclofenac, had no significant effect on rollers. All treatments reduced adherent and migrated leukocytes and expression of endothelial intercellular adhesion molecule-1. Venular shear rate, venular diameters, number of circulating leukocytes, and post-leukotriene B4 expression of l-selectin and CD11/CD18 integrin in leukocytes were unaffected by any treatment. Expression of P-selectin was reduced by diclofenac and unaffected by enalapril, even when combined with diclofenac. Our data suggest that, although diclofenac does not interfere with the enalapril anti-hypertensive effect, enalapril interferes with the effect diclofenac has on leukocyte rolling and endothelial P-selectin expression. Involvement of reduced endothelial intercellular adhesion molecule-1 expression might explain the lower numbers of adherent and migrated leukocytes. The anti-inflammatory properties of a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug could therefore be attenuated in hypertensive patients receiving an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor.     

丹参、双氯芬酸钠和β-七叶皂甙钠联用治疗严重偏头痛疗效分析

目的：探讨丹参，双氯芬酸钠和β-叶皂甙钠联合治疗严重偏头痛的疗效。方法：用丹参、双氯芬酸钠（诺福丁）和β－七叶皂甙钠联用治疗严重偏头痛51例，观察其临床疗效，并与双氯芬酸钠治疗严重偏头痛62例进行对比。结果：联合用药组与双氯芬酸钠单用组总有效率及控制率差异显性（P＜0．01）。结论：丹参、双氯芬酸钠、β－七叶皂甙钠联用治疗严重偏头痛疗效确切。     

Gastrointestinal safety of selective COX-2 inhibitors

It appears that selective Cox-2 inhibitors do not affect the gastro duodenal mucosa whilst having anti-inflammatory and analgesic efficacy similar to non-selective NSAIDs. Two broad categories of drugs are Cox-2 selective: coxibs and a number of pre-existing NSAIDs retrospectively found to have selectivity. Cox-2 inhibitors cause less dyspepsia than NSAIDs. They spare gastrointestinal mucosal generation of prostaglandins (PGs) and PG-dependent bicarbonate secretion. Coxibs cause no acute mucosal injury in endoscopic ulcers compared to NSAID comparators. In the VIGOR study all upper GI events were reduced from 4.5 per 100 patient years to 2.1 per 100 patient years with supra-therapeutic doses of rofecoxib compared with naproxen. In the CLASS study, over a period of 3 days to 6 months, incidence of ulcer complications was 0.76% with celecoxib and 1.45% for ibuprofen or diclofenac. The less substantial reduction in events in the CLASS study compared with the VIGOR may be due, at least in part, to the fact that 21% of the patients were also on low dose aspirin. However it is premature to say that the benefit of Cox-2 inhibitors is lost in patients taking aspirin. There is continuing debate on the role of Cox-2 inhibitors in patients who have other risk factors for complicated ulcer disease e.g. patients who are elderly, on aspirin or corticosteroids, have a previous ulcer or have H. pylori infection.