National Study of Internal Medicine Manpower. XVIII: Subspecialty fellowships with a special look at hematology and oncology, 1988-1989

OBJECTIVE: To determine the number and distribution of internists in subspecialty training and compare with data collected since 1976; to determine the distribution of activity of subspecialty fellows; and to focus on hematology and oncology. DESIGN: Repeated mail survey with telephone follow-up. PARTICIPANTS: All directors of subspecialty training programs in internal medicine in the United States. RESULTS: The 1988-1989 census identified 7530 fellows in training, 55 more than in 1987-1988. There are 24 more first-year fellows. Reports on the activities of subspecialty fellows show that, overall, 53% of fellows' time is spent in direct patient care, 20% on basic research, 15% on patient-related research, and 12% in teaching. CONCLUSIONS: The number of internists entering subspecialty training has risen at a considerably slower rate in the last 5 years compared with the 5 years before that. The length of subspecialty training has increased significantly since 1976. There has been a shift in subspecialty choice from hematology to oncology and toward joint programs offering both subspecialties.     

Contributions of general internal medicine teaching units

OBJECTIVE: To identify and describe general internal medicine teaching units and their educational activities. DESIGN: A cross-sectional mailed survey of heads of general internal medicine teaching units affiliated with U.S. internal medicine training programs who responded between December 1996 and December 1997. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Responses were received from 249 (61%) of 409 eligible programs. Responding and nonresponding programs were similar in terms of university affiliation, geographic region, and size of residency program. Fifty percent of faculty received no funding from teaching units, 37% received full-time (50% or more time), and 13% received part-time (under 50% time) funding from units. Only 23% of faculty were primarily located at universities or medical schools. The majority of faculty were classified as clinicians (15% or less time spent in teaching) or clinician-educators (more than 15% time spent in teaching), and few were clinician-researchers (30% or more time spent in research). Thirty-six percent of faculty were internal medicine subspecialists. All units were involved in training internal medicine residents and medical students, and 21% trained fellows of various types. Half of the units had teaching clinics located in underserved areas, and one fourth had teaching clinics serving more than 50% managed care patients. Heads of teaching units reported that 54% of recent graduating residents chose careers in general internal medicine. CONCLUSIONS: General internal medicine teaching units surveyed contributed substantial faculty effort, much of it unfunded and located off-campus, to training medical students, residents, and fellows. A majority of their graduating residents chose generalist careers. Presented at the national meeting of the Society of General Internal Medicine, April 1998, and the Bureau of Health Professions, June 1998. This work was supported by the Division of Medicine, Bureau of Health Professions, Health Resources and Services Administration, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Rockville, Md, grant 103HR960470P000-000; and the Society of General Internal Medicine.     

National study of internal medicine manpower: IV. Residency and fellowship training 1977-1978 and 1978-1979.

The National Study of Internal Medicine Manpower gathered data on the number of residents in training in internal medicine and the number of fellows in subspecialty training, for 1977-1978 and for 1978-1979. In the latter period, there were 16720 residents in all years of training. The 7.2% average annual increase in the number of first-year residents during the earlier half of the 1970s slowed in 1977-1978 and 1978-1979 to 4.6% and 4.2%, respectively, reflecting a similar decline in the number of medical school graduates. The most important finding of the study is that the steep rise (10.6% per year) in the number of subspecialty fellowship trainees characteristic of the years 1972-1973 through 1976-1977 has abated. The number of fellows in subspecialty training has remained essentially constant in the past 2 years. Thus, although the number of residents continued to increase and the number of fellows remained constant, the number (and percentage) of internists in training who intend to practice general internal medicine rose.     

National study of internal medicine manpower: III. Subspecialty fellowship training 1976-1977.

Questionnaire II of the National Study of Internal Medicine Manpower was directed to all of the 1502 subspecialty training programs in the United States and Puerto Rico. The overall response rate was 86%. For the years 1972-1973 through 1976-1977 the number of fellows in subspecialty training grew at an average rate of 10.6% per year, or one and one-half times greater than the growth rate of 7.2% in the number of first-year residents in training for the same time period. In 1976-1977 there were 5826 fellows in subspecialty fellowship training, of whom 26% were foreign medical graduates. Stipends for subspecialty fellows in 1976-1977 amounted to $90 million, 40% of which was derived from direct federal funds and 33% from hospital revenues. Most of the subspecialty fellowship programs were in large teaching hospitals, which are closely affiliated with the nation's medical schools. The 1976-1977 professional activities of former subspecialty trainees who had finished their training between 1972 and 1976 were distributed roughly in thirds between research-teaching, teaching-practice, and practice. We discuss public policy implications of the data.     

Ambulatory morning report

We assessed the ability of a novel ambulatory morning report format to expose internal medicine residents to the breadth of topics covered by the American Board of Internal Medicine (ABIM) exam. Cases were selected by the Ambulatory Assistant Chief Residents and recorded in a logbook to limit duplication. We conducted a retrospective review of 406 cases discussed from July 1998 to July 2000 and cataloged each according to the primary content area. The percentage of cases in each area accurately reflected that covered by the ABIM exam, with little redundancy or over-selection of esoteric diseases. Our data suggest that a general medicine clinic is capable of exposing house staff to the wide breadth of internal medicine topics previously thought to be unique to subspecialty clinics.     

Recent trends in internal medicine education: A brief update

This perspective attempts to bring graduate medical offices, residency programs and medical students interested in categorical internal medicine (CIM) a brief update on the American Board of Internal Medicine (ABIM), Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) and the National Registry for Medical Programs (NRMP) changes for the past 3–5 years in the United States (US). The US model for certification and recertification may serve as a homogenous example for other countries. This model will be described so that there is an understanding of the importance of such changes in the American system and its effect on resident education. This is critical knowledge for both teachers and learners in internal medicine in preparation for a lifetime career and requirements for certification/credentialing for both programs and their residents/fellows. Data from the review indicate a small increase in the number of applicants but a concordant decrease in ABIM initial certification exams. Programs should well be aware of the new focus on outcomes via the Next Accreditation System (NAS) being put forth by the ACGME.     

National Study of Internal Medicine Manpower: XVI. Subspecialty fellowship programs, 1988 update

Much of the debate about medical manpower during the 1980s has focused on the growing number of medical subspecialists. We examined the number of subspecialty fellows since 1976, paying particular attention to data collected in the 1987-1988 academic year. The number of fellows in subspecialty training at a given time has increased by 27% since 1976; however, much of this increase is due to the increased length of the training programs. The number of first-year fellows has increased only 7% since 1976. Growth in the number of fellowships has varied by subspecialty. The number of fellowships in geriatrics, critical care, and general internal medicine has increased dramatically. Additionally, the traditional subspecialties-cardiology, pulmonary disease, gastroenterology, infectious diseases, rheumatology, and allergy-immunology-have all grown to some extent. Program directors in all subspecialties anticipate continued growth in the coming years.     

National Study of Internal Medicine Manpower. XIV: Patterns of residency and fellowship over time, 1987 update

In response to concerns among internists following the 1987 internal medicine match, this report compares internal medicine trainees with those in other specialties since 1972, describes their paths through the internal medicine "pipeline," and documents their distribution and continuation rates in residency and subspecialty fellowship programs. It is based on the National Study of Internal Medicine Manpower, 1987-1988. Between 1972 and 1986 the number of trainees in internal medicine doubled, and the percentage of trainees in internal medicine grew from 20% to 25%, while the percentage in surgical specialties declined from 28% to 19%. The numbers of women and foreign medical school graduates training in internal medicine have continued to increase, but minority representation has stabilized. Women and minorities have lower continuation rates into fellowships, and distinctive patterns of subspecialization are found among women, minorities, and foreign medical school graduates.     

Predicting pass rates on the american board of internal medicine certifying examination

Our objective was to determine the ability of the internal medicine In-Training Examination (ITE) to predict pass or fail outcomes on the American Board of Internal Medicine (ABIM) certifying examination and to develop an externally validated predictive model and a simple equation that can be used by residency directors to provide probability feedback for their residency programs. We collected a study sample of 155 internal medicine residents from the three Virginia internal medicine programs and a validation sample of 64 internal medicine residents from a residency program outside Virginia. Scores from both samples were collected across three class cohorts. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov z test indicated no statistically significant difference between the distribution of scores for the two samples ( z = 1.284, p = .074). Results of the logistic model yielded a statistically significant prediction of ABIM pass or fail performance from ITE scores (Wald = 35.49, SE = 0.036, df = 1, p < .005) and overall correct classifications for the study sample and validation sample at 79% and 75%, respectively. The ITE is a useful tool in assessing the likelihood of a resident's passing or failing the ABIM certifying examination but is less predictive for residents who received ITE scores between 49 and 66.     

Do ratings on the american board of internal medicine resident evaluation form detect differences in clinical competence?

Objective: To determine whether raters using the American Board of Internal Medicine (ABIM) Resident Evaluation Form can detect differences among residents in clinical competence. Design: Cross-sectional study. Setting: Inpatient general medicine service in a university-affiliated public hospital. Participants: University-based internal medicine (UCIM) residents (ABIM certifying examination pass rate, 91%; mean score, 95th percentile), community hospital-based internal medicine (CHIM) residents (ABIM examination pass rate, 68%; mean score, 42nd percentile), and residents from three university-based non-internal medicine (UC non-IM) programs all assigned to the same inpatient general medicine service over a three-year period. Four hundred eighty-nine evaluations of 110 postgraduate-year-one residents were analyzed. Measurements and main results: Mean ratings for the UCIM residents were significantly higher than those for the CHIM or UC non-IM residents (analysis of variance [ANOVA], p<0.05). Variance was smallest for the UCIM residents (F test, p<0.01), and only the UCIM residents’ mean scores were in the “superior” range (7–9) in all evaluated categories. The mean ratings for the CHIM residents while at the university-affiliated hospital were not significantly different from the ratings of the same residents at their home hospital. The ratings for the CHIM residents at either site were significantly lower than those for the UCIM residents in all categories (ANOVA, p<0.05). Factor analysis revealed a single factor accounting for 76% of the variance among the ratings with all dimensions loading high on that factor (0.75–0.95), providing evidence for a “halo” effect. Mean interrater agreement over all variables was 0.87, indicating good consistency among raters. Conclusions: Ratings on the ABIM Resident Evaluation Form detect global differences among residents in clinical competence in the expected direction based on type of training program and performance on the ABIM certification examination, but fail to differentiate among the nine evaluated dimensions of clinical care. This rating method may be valid for assessing overall clinical performance, but is less useful for providing feedback in specific areas to individual residents. Presented in part at the annual meeting of the Society of General Internal Medicine, Seattle, Washington, May 1, 1991. Supported in part by grant PE 19179 for residency training in general internal medicine and general pediatrics from the Bureau of Health Professions, Health Resources and Services Administration of the Public Health Service.     

Training the Next Generation’s Nephrology Workforce

The subspecialty of nephrology faces several critical challenges, including declining interest among medical students and internal medicine residents and worrisome declines in the number of applicants for nephrology fellowships. There is an urgent need to more clearly define the subspecialty and its scope of practice, reinvigorate meaningful research training and activities among trainees, and ensure that fellows who complete training and enter the practice of nephrology are experts in the broad scope of nephrology. This need requires a critical look at fellowship training programs and training requirements. A new workforce analysis is also needed that is not focused on primarily meeting estimated future clinical needs but rather, ensuring that there is alignment of supply and demand for nephrology trainees, which will ensure that those entering nephrology fellowships are highly qualified and capable of becoming outstanding nephrologists and that there are desirable employment opportunities for them when they complete their training.     

Certification in internal medicine: 1989–1992

Objective: To determine whether changes in the demographic/educational mix of those entering internal medicine from 1986 to 1989 were associated with differences among them at the time of certification. Participants: Included in the study were all candidates for the 1989 to 1992 American Board of Internal Medicine certifying examinations in internal medicine. Measurements: Demographic information and medical school, residency training, and examination experience were available for each candidate. Data defining quality, size, and number of subspecialties were available for internal medicine training programs. Results: From 1990 to 1992, the total number of men and women candidates increased as did the numbers of foreign-citizen non-U.S. medical school graduates and osteopathic medical school graduates; the number of U.S. medical school graduates remained nearly constant and the number of U.S.-citizen graduates of non-U.S. medical schools declined. The pass rates for all groups of first-time examination takers decreased, while the ratings of program directors remained relatively constant. Program quality, size, and number of subspecialty programs had modest positive relationships with examination performance. Conclusions: Changes in the characteristics of those entering internal medicine from 1986 to 1989 were associated with declines in performance at the time of certification. These declines occurred in all content areas of the test and were apparent regardless of program quality. These data identify some of the challenges internal medicine faces in the years ahead. Received from the American Board of Internal Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. This research was supported by the American Board of Internal Medicine but does not necessarily reflect its opinions or policies.     

Procedural experience and comfort level in internal medicine trainees

BACKGROUND: The American Board of Internal Medicine (ABIM) has recommended a specific number of procedures be done as a minimum standard for ensuring competence in various medical procedures. These minimum standards were determined by consensus of an expert panel and may not reflect actual procedural comfort or competence. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the minimum number of selected procedures at which a majority of internal medicine trainees become comfortable performing that procedure. DESIGN: Cross-sectional, self-administered survey. SETTING: A military-based, a community-based, and 2 university-based programs. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred thirty-two internal medicine residents. MEASUREMENTS: Survey questions included number of specific procedures performed, comfort level with performing specific procedures, and whether respondents desired further training in specific procedures. The comfort threshold for a given procedure was defined as the number of procedures at which two thirds or more of the respondents reported being comfortable or very comfortable performing that procedure. RESULTS: For three of seven procedures selected, residents were comfortable performing the procedure at or below the number recommended by the ABIM as a minimum requirement. However, residents needed more procedures than recommended by the ABIM to feel comfortable with central venous line placement, knee joint aspiration, lumbar puncture, and thoracentesis. Using multivariate logistic regression analysis, variables independently associated with greater comfort performing selected procedures included increased number performed, more years of training, male gender, career goals, and for skin biopsy, training in the community-based program. Except for skin biopsy, comfort level was independent of training site. A significant number of advanced-year house officers in some programs had little experience in performing selected common ambulatory procedures. CONCLUSION: Minimum standards for certifying internal medicine residents may need to be reexamined in light of house officer comfort level performing selected procedures.     

Attitudes and perceptions of internal medicine residents regarding pulmonary and critical care subspecialty training

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the attitudes and perceptions of internal medicine residents regarding pulmonary and critical care medicine (PCCM) training. DESIGN: Prospective study. SETTING: Three university hospitals. METHODS: An eight-page survey was distributed and collected between March 1, 2002, and June 30, 2002. All internal medicine or internal medicine/pediatric residents training at the three institutions were eligible for the study. RESULTS: One hundred seventy-eight residents in internal medicine from an eligible pool of 297 residents returned the survey (61% response rate). PCCM accounted for only 3.4% of the career choices. Forty-one percent of the residents seriously considered a pulmonary and/or critical care fellowship during their residency. Of these residents, 23.5% found the combination of programs the more attractive option, while 2.8% found pulmonary alone and 14.5% found critical care alone more attractive. Key factors associated with a higher resident interest in PCCM subspecialty training included more weeks in the ICU (p = 0.008), more role models in PCCM (3.02 +/- 0.78 vs 3.45 +/- 0.78, p = 0.0004), and resident observations of a greater sense of satisfaction among PCCM faculty (3.07 +/- 0.82 vs 3.33 +/- 0.82, p = 0.04) and fellows (3.05 +/- 0.69 vs 3.31 +/- 0.86, p = 0.03) [mean +/- SD]. The five most commonly cited attributes of PCCM fellowship that would attract residents to the field included intellectual stimulation (69%), opportunities to manage critically ill patients (51%), application of complex physiologic principles (45%), number of procedures performed (31%), and academically challenging rounds (29%). The five most commonly cited attributes of PCCM that would dissuade residents from the field included overly demanding responsibilities with lack of leisure time (54%), stress among faculty and fellows (45%), management responsibilities for chronically ill patients (30%), poor match of career with resident personality (24%), and treatment of pulmonary diseases (16%). CONCLUSIONS: Internal medicine residents have serious reservations about PCCM as a career choice. Our survey demonstrated that a minority of US medical graduates actually would choose PCCM as a career, which suggests that efforts to expand PCCM training capacity might result in vacant fellowship slots. To promote greater interest in PCCM training, efforts are needed to improve the attractiveness of PCCM and address the negative lifestyle perceptions of residents.     

Geriatrics training in general internal medicine fellowship programs: current practice, barriers, and strategies for improvement

To ensure its growth and prosperity, general internal medicine will need to embrace care of the elderly, research on aging, and geriatrics education as components of its core mission. Experts agree that general internal medicine fellows could benefit from increased opportunities in research on aging and geriatrics education; however, important barriers will hamper efforts to integrate geriatrics training into general internal medicine fellowship programs. This article reviews the barriers to integration and proposes solutions for overcoming those barriers. As a result of interviews and meetings with a broad representation of general internists, geriatricians, funding agencies, and policymakers, we propose 2 interventions: 1) the development of institutional program grants to foster collaboration between general internal medicine and geriatrics faculty in the training of general internal medicine fellows and 2) the creation of a 3-year fellowship program combining general internal medicine and geriatrics. This article discusses the importance of evaluating these and other programs intended to increase the geriatrics experience of general internal medicine fellows, and it describes the potential implications of these changes for a broad array of stakeholder institutions.     

Sleep medicine training across the spectrum

There is now a new pathway and examination for sleep medicine, sponsored by the American Board of Internal Medicine, and a number of accredited sleep medicine fellowship programs through the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. This review takes an historical approach to discuss the process of education for sleep physiology and disorders not only in the postgraduate period but also at all levels of instruction. In reality, there is a continuum of knowledge that needs to be reinforced up and down the educational system, of which Sleep Medicine subspecialty training is just one part. Although progress has been made at all educational levels up to this point, the future of training and education will depend on a sustained effort at several levels from undergraduate to postgraduate continuing medical education and will be facilitated by professional societies and other specialties who will collectively promote the value of and outcomes for clinical sleep medicine.     

National Study of Internal Medicine Manpower: X. Internal medicine residency and fellowship training: 1985 update

The number of medical school graduates entering internal medicine residency training was at an all-time high in 1984-85. Although the number of first-year residents who were foreign-trained physicians did not differ greatly from the 1983-84 census, the number of first-year residents who were U.S. medical school graduates was much higher than the previous year largely because the number of graduates from U.S. medical schools increased substantially in 1984. The number of internal medicine fellowship programs and the number of fellows in 1984-85 were also at an all-time high. Foreign-trained physicians represent 22% of those in residency training and 20% of those in fellowship training. Of every 100 who completed residency training, 61 went on to a first year of subspecialty fellowship training, a number up slightly from the previous year. The increasing numbers of residents and fellows being trained in internal medicine, combined with the preference for subspecialization and the substantial proportion of foreign-trained physicians being trained, are discussed against the background of pending legislation to reduce federal assistance for graduate medical education.     

National Study of Internal Medicine Manpower: XIX. Trends in internal medicine residency training programs.

The National Study of Internal Medicine Manpower (NaSIMM) reports on the results of its 1989-1990 census of residency programs. The results are integrated into an organizational model identifying inputs, process, outputs, and environment of medical training programs. The number of residents entering internal medicine continues to grow at a relatively rapid pace. This growth is largely accounted for by foreign citizens who are graduates of foreign medical schools (AFMGs). Residents are spending an increasing proportion of their time in ambulatory care settings, but, thus far, this ambulatory care training has occurred primarily in hospital clinics and emergency rooms. The proportion of a program's residents entering general internal medicine was found in a multiple regression analysis to be negatively associated with the number of subspecialty programs located in the training hospital, the percent of AFMG residents in the program, and the presence of a preliminary track in the program.     

A model for the objective assessment of clinical training programs: the initial application to two pulmonary medicine fellowship programs

A model is presented for the objective assessment of clinical training programs. The model documents the clinical trainee's experience by the diagnoses seen and procedures performed during a full year of experience. It also surveys faculty impressions of the trainee's experience and their judgment of what is necessary to constitute an adequate experience. In the pilot study applying this model to two pulmonary medicine fellowship programs, several important observations were made: (1) faculty members may not have an accurate perception of the fellow's actual clinical experience, (2) faculty impressions of the fellow's experience often do not correspond to their own conception of an adequate clinical experience, (3) interprogram variability exists, (4) pulmonary fellows may have inadequate experience with certain invasive procedures. These observations suggest that wilder application of such a model could provide valuable information to program directors and subspecialty boards. In addition, directors of pulmonary disease training programs have been asked by the American Board of Internal Medicine to establish systems to evaluate, document, and substantiate those components of overall clinical competence considered essential for certification in the subspecialty. The model presented here provides an accurate and efficient means for such evaluation and documentation.