Percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stent implantation vs. minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) in patients with left anterior descending coronary artery stenosis.

The aim of this study was to assess the effects of percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents (DESs) versus minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) surgery in the management of patients with proximal left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery stenosis. Until recent years, despite the advantages of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) with bare metal stent implantation, such as shorter hospital stays and recovery time, MIDCAB showed better results with regard to the need for repeated intervention in the target vessel than PTCA with proximal LAD lesions. Symptomatic patients (n = 189) were randomly assigned to DES group (n = 119) and MIDCAB group (n = 70). Patients with an isolated high-grade lesion (stenosis of > or = 70% of the luminal diameter) in the proximal LAD coronary artery (from the ostium to the first diagonal branch) were included in this study. During the 6-month follow-up period, 1.7% (n = 2) in the DES group needed repeated revascularization procedures for target lesion revascularization compared with 5.9% (n = 4) in the MIDCAB group (P = 0.196). The rates of death and myocardial infarction were similar in both groups [DES 0.0% (n = 0) vs. MIDCAB 2.9% (n = 2), P = 0.135; DES 1.7% (n = 2) vs. MIDCAB 2.9% (n = 2), P = 0.627; respectively] during 6 months of follow-up. In-hospital length of stay was significantly shorter in the DES group compared with the MIDCAB group (5.8 +/- 2.1 days vs. 8.9 +/- 2.6 days; P = 0.001). DES implantation and MIDCAB surgery showed similar rates of myocardial infarction, the need for repeated revascularization, and death during 6 months of follow-up. However, DES implantation resulted in lower average number of hospital stays and similar postoperative complications.     

MIDCAB术治疗心肌桥与非心肌桥性左前降支病变的临床效果分析

目的 比较微创直视下冠状动脉旁路移植术（MIDCAB）治疗心肌桥与非心肌桥性左前降支（LAD）病变的临床效果.方法 2006年5月至2013年5月,37例冠心病患者在我院行MIDCAB手术,其中男性29例,女性8例,年龄48～76（62.9±6.8）岁.术前冠心病造影诊断：心肌桥致LAD重度狭窄12例（心肌桥组）,非心肌桥性LAD闭塞或LAD重度狭窄25例（非心肌桥组）.37例患者均经左胸前侧第4或第5肋间6 cm左右的小切口,非体外循环下完成LIMA-LAD吻合.结果 全组37例MIDCAB手术均顺利完成,无术中转为正中开胸手术,手术时间为117～143 min,围术期均未输血.术后呼吸机辅助通气时间为4～16 h,ICU停留时间为22～45 h,术后住院时间为6～10 d,全部患者术后无急性心梗和脑卒中等严重并发症及术后死亡,心肌桥组与非心肌桥组无明显差异（P＞0.05）.术后随访3～87 （27.59±19.15）个月,所有患者均做多层CT检查,LIMA-LAD吻合口通畅率为100％,全部患者没有心绞痛症状.结论 MIDCAB治疗心肌桥与非心肌桥性LAD病变可取得相同的优良效果.     

Simultaneous "hybrid" percutaneous coronary intervention and minimally invasive surgical bypass grafting: feasibility, safety, and clinical outcomes

Surgical and percutaneous coronary artery intervention revascularization are traditionally considered isolated options. A simultaneous hybrid approach may allow an opportunity to match the best strategy for a particular anatomic lesion. Concerns regarding safety and feasibility of such an approach exist. We examined the safety, feasibility, and early outcomes of a simultaneous hybrid revascularization strategy (minimally invasive direct coronary bypass grafting of the left anterior descending [LAD] artery and drug-eluting stent [DES] to non-LAD lesions) in 13 patients with multivessel coronary artery disease that underwent left internal mammary artery to LAD minimally invasive direct coronary bypass performed through a lateral thoracotomy, followed by stenting of non-LAD lesions, in a fluoroscopy-equipped operating room. Assessment of coagulation parameters was also undertaken. Inhospital and postdischarge outcomes of these patients were compared to a group of 26 propensity score matched parallel controls that underwent standard off-pump coronary artery bypass. Baseline characteristics were similar in both groups. All hybrid patients were successfully treated with DES and no inhospital mortality occurred in either group. Hybrid patients had a shorter length of stay (3.6 +/- 1.5 vs 6.3 +/- 2.3 days, P < .0001) and intubation times (0.5 +/- 1.3 vs 11.7 +/- 9.6 hours, P < .02). Despite aggressive anticoagulation and confirmed platelet inhibition, hybrid patients had less blood loss (581 +/- 402 vs 1242 +/- 941 mL, P < .05) and decreased transfusions (0.33 +/- 0.49 vs 1.47 +/- 1.53 U, P < .01). Six-month angiographic vessel patency and major adverse cardiac events were similar in the hybrid and off-pump coronary artery bypass groups. A simultaneous hybrid approach consisting of minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting with left internal mammary artery to LAD combined with revascularization of the remaining coronary targets using percutaneous coronary artery intervention with DES is a feasible option accomplished with acceptable clinical outcomes without increased bleeding risk.     

Hybrid revascularization using percutaneous coronary intervention and robotically assisted minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass surgery

Hybrid revascularization (HR) combines staged percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) on stenoses in the non-left anterior descending (LAD) territories with minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) using the left internal thoracic artery (LITA) to the LAD. The LITA-to-LAD graft, which has a 5-year patency rate of 95%, is the major determinant of the long-term survival for patients. Thus, HR aims to perform full revascularization without compromising the survival advantage of the LITA-to-LAD graft, while preserving the minimally invasive advantages associated with the percutaneous treatment of symptomatic coronary stenoses. We investigated whether HR was a valid alternative to conventional coronary artery bypass graft surgery in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease. We also present our early experiences with HR using a combined approach of advanced PCI and robotically-assisted MIDCAB.     

Robot-assisted coronary artery bypass grafting improves short-term outcomes compared with minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting

Background

Robot-assisted coronary artery bypass grafts (RACAB) utilizing the da Vinci surgical system are increasingly used and allow the surgeon to conveniently harvest internal mammary arteries (IMAs). The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of off-pump RACAB and minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting (MIDCAB) in the short and medium term.

Methods

We performed a retrospective review of 132 patients with single- or multiple-vessel coronary artery disease who underwent minimally invasive off-pump CABG (OPCAB) between May 2009 and May 2014. The patients were divided into two groups based on the surgical approach, MIDCAB and RACAB group. The anastomosis of the left internal mammary artery (LIMA) to the left anterior descending artery (LAD) was performed as regular OPCAB through the incision on the beating heart using regular stabilization devices (Genzyme Corporation). The preoperative, intraoperative, postoperative, and follow-up data, including major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), were compared.

Results

The preoperative data were similar. RACAB significantly shorten the intensive care unit (ICU) stay and postoperative compared with the MIDCAB group (P<0.05). There were 12 (19.7%) patients treated with a two-stage hybrid procedure in the MIDCAB group and 34 (47.9%) patients in the RACAB group (P=0.001). Thirty-day mortality was 1.6% in the MIDCAB group. There were 9 (14.7%) MIDCAB patients and 2 (2.8%) RACAB patients (P=0.013) that developed new arrhythmia. The two groups showed comparable mid-term survival (P=0.246), but the MACCEs were significantly different (P=0.038).

Conclusions

RACAB may be a valuable alternative for patients requiring single or simple multi-vessel coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Although the mid-term mortality outcomes are similar, RACAB improves short-term outcomes and mid-term MACCE-free survival compared with MIDCAB.     

The hybrid approach to coronary artery revascularization: minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass with percutaneous coronary intervention

In the past decade, new developments in cardiology and cardiac surgery have begun to offer patients a variety of new, less invasive options for the treatment of coronary artery disease. One such option is the hybrid approach to coronary artery revascularization. This combines minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass surgery (MIDCAB) of the left anterior descending artery (LAD) with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of the remaining diseased coronary arteries. This approach, as an alternative to conventional coronary artery bypass surgery, retains the benefit of internal mammary artery bypass to the LAD, accomplished with a minimally invasive technique, substitutes PCI for saphenous vein grafts as treatment for low-grade lesions of other coronary arteries, and may provide a maximally beneficial outcome for many patients. Preliminary outcomes of patients receiving the hybrid approach have been strikingly positive. This report highlights the rationale for the development of this procedure, patient selection, results, and future applications of this emerging method of treating coronary artery disease.     

Hybrid-Verfahren zur Myokardrevaskularisation: Stellenwert der Kombination von minimal-invasiver Bypasstechnik (MIDCAB) mit interventioneller Therapie (PTCA)

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) grafting without cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) through an anterolateral minithoracotomy has become a promising therapeutical option especially in multimorbid, elderly and reoperative patients with single vessel disease. However, this procedure precludes complete revascularization in multivessel disease because the minithoracotomy limits the surgical access either to anterior or lateral or posterior vessels of the beating heart. To expand the benefits of the MIDCAB concept to patients with multivessel disease, new interdisciplinary approaches have recently been introduced. METHODS: Since December 1996, 26 patients (21 male, 5 female, mean age 56.6 +/- 18.8 years) underwent a "hybrid" revascularization performed as a primary MIDCAB procedure for grafting of the left anterior descending artery (LAD) with the left internal mammary artery (LIMA) followed by staged angioplasty and stenting of additional coronary lesions. RESULTS: After MIDCAB grafting, the postoperative course was uneventful in all patients. Coronary re-angiography after a median of 7 days revealed patent and functioning LIMA grafts in all patients. Applying subsequent percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) and occasional stenting (n = 8), a total of 31 lesions were treated successfully. Procedure related complications did not occur. All patients remained angina-free and no stress electrocardiographic changes were recorded. CONCLUSION: Our preliminary results of a "hybrid" approach to myocardial revascularization suggest that this concept is a safe and effective approach of complete revascularization for selected patients with multivessel involvement. Especially elderly and reoperative patients with significant comorbidity may benefit from hybrid procedures avoiding cardiopulmonary bypass and midsternotomy.     

Myocardial perfusion imaging evidence of functionally complete revascularization by minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass in 2-vessel coronary artery disease.

BACKGROUND: Whether patency of a second diseased vessel still impacts myocardial perfusion when complete revascularization of the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) territory has been achieved is currently undetermined. In patients with 2-vessel coronary artery disease and complex LAD lesions, we evaluated the impact of single LAD or integrated revascularization on single photon emission computed tomography-assessed reversible myocardial ischemia. METHODS AND RESULTS: Thirty-five candidates for revascularization with double-vessel disease including the LAD and a preoperative stress single photon emission computed tomography study were studied. Revascularization was performed by minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) alone (n = 15) or by an integrated procedure with second-vessel angioplasty, either soon after surgery (n = 13) or at 2 months (n = 7), according to the extent of reversible perfusion defects in the second vessel territory. At 1 year, the total ischemic area decreased from 9.3 +/- 5.1 to 0.8 +/- 1.5 in MIDCAB-only patients and from 8.2 +/- 4.9 to 1.6 +/- 2.9 in the integrated group (P = .87 for treatment and P < .001 for time). The ischemic area in the second vessel territory similarly decreased in both groups (P = .81 for treatment and P < .001 for time). CONCLUSIONS: In 2-vessel coronary artery disease involving the LAD, MIDCAB alone achieves, in a substantial proportion of patients, functionally complete revascularization even in the nonrevascularized second vessel territory.     

Multivessel coronary stenting versus bypass surgery in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease and normal left ventricular function: immediate and 2-year long-term follow-up

BACKGROUND: Compared with coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG), the clinical benefits of intracoronary stenting have not been established in patients with multivessel coronary lesions. METHODS AND RESULTS: To compare the clinical outcomes of intracoronary stenting with that of CABG, we reviewed the outcomes of patients with multivessel coronary artery disease from an observational database. Two hundred consecutive patients with multivessel coronary artery disease and normal left ventricular function were evaluated. In 200 patients, multivessel stenting was performed in 100 and CABG was performed in 100. Complete revascularization was achieved in 95% in the CABG group and in 69% in the stent group (P <.05). The duration of total hospital stay and coronary care unit admission was significantly shorter in the stent group (P <.05). The long-term survival was similar between the 2 groups. There were no significant differences of cardiac events between the 2 groups except for the recurrence of angina (19% in stenting vs 8% in CABG, P =.03) and target lesion revascularization (19% vs 2%, P <.01) in the patients with stents. CONCLUSIONS: In selected patients with multivessel coronary artery disease and normal left ventricular function, intracoronary stenting may offer an effective alternative to coronary bypass surgery.     

Left internal mammary artery grafting to left anterior descending coronary artery by minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass approach

New surgical techniques for the treatment of the isolated lesion of the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) include off-pump surgery, minimal access to the heart, and endoscopic or computer enhanced coronary artery bypass surgery. The term minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass surgery (MIDCAB) is related to a leftside minithoracotomy, the harvest of the left internal mammary artery (IMA) under direct vision, and an anastomosis performed between IMA and LAD under direct vision, using the technique of mechanical local immobilization by a special device. Alternative techniques include endoscopic harvesting of the IMA, or as a new and still experimental approach, the closed-chest total endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting (TECAB) with the use of a high tech telemanipulator system. The currently reported results demonstrate the safety of MIDCAB surgery (30-day mortality < 0.5%, perioperative myocardial infarction < 2%, early patency rate between 95% and 98%). Mid-term results after 6 months have shown a patency rate between 94% and 97%, and more than 90% of the patients are without any angina symptoms. Due to this promising results MIDCAB is an alternative treatment for high-grade LAD lesions.     

Coronary artery surgery: conventional coronary artery bypass grafting versus off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Coronary revascularization has become the principal treatment modality in patients with severe coronary artery disease. The broader application of percutaneous coronary interventions in patients with multivessel disease and the recent introduction of drug-eluting stents have both lead to a decline in the number of patients referred for surgical revascularization. Conventional coronary artery bypass grafting using cardiopulmonary bypass is an excellent treatment, however less invasive surgical approaches such as off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting have appeared in the past few years. The exact role of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting is still vaguely defined and being critically evaluated. Our aim is to provide an objective review of the recent literature in regard to surgical outcomes. RECENT FINDINGS: A critical review of all relevant clinical series from May 2003 to May 2005 was conducted. Current prospective data suggests that both techniques have similar rates of mortality, in regard to morbidity, multiple prospective studies suggest a decrease in stroke rates for off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. The incidence of postoperative myocardial infarction does not appear to differ between techniques. When analyzed carefully, the results presented herein seem to indicate that both techniques provide similar rates for long-term patency and freedom from surgical reintervention. SUMMARY: Coronary artery bypass grafting and off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting are both safe and beneficial in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease. It appears that elderly patients with additional co-morbid risk factors may benefit most from off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. It has become increasingly apparent that off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting can be performed safely in reference centers.     

Mid-term results of conventional bypass surgery for complex proximal left anterior descending coronary artery stenoses.

BACKGROUND: The significant involvement of proximal left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery affects patient prognosis and must be treated. Recently, as alternative methods to conventional coronary bypass (CABG), minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting (MIDCAB) and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty with stent implantation (PTCA/S) have been proposed to reduce costs and patient discomfort. The aim of this study was to obtain early and medium-term results of CABG in patients with complex LAD disease in whom the expected results with PTCA/S or MIDCAB would have been suboptimal. METHODS: We retrospectively examined one hundred consecutive patients subjected to isolated CABG who received either a single graft to LAD or several grafts to LAD and diagonal branches. The choice of CABG was due to poor expectable results with PTCA/S or MIDCAB because of anatomical characteristics of the lesion, inclusion in ongoing randomized study comparing surgical versus non-surgical revascularization, or preference on the part of the cardiologist or patient. RESULTS: Left internal mammary artery (LIMA) was grafted to LAD in 99 (99%) patients; 65 (65%) patients received at least one saphenous graft to the diagonal branches. No death was observed within 30 days from the operation. One (1%) patient had a perioperative non-Q myocardial infarction (MI). At a mean follow-up time of 38 +/- 16 months (range 2-60), there were no cardiac deaths and no new MI. Six patients complained of recurrent angina: in all cases but one (vein graft failure to a diagonal branch), there were no clinical or diagnostic signs suggesting other graft failures. The probability of freedom from early and late events, including cardiac death, MI and recurrence of angina regardless of site, was 99% at 1 year and 86% at 5 years. CONCLUSIONS: At present, conventional CABG seems to be the "gold standard palliation" of LAD disease in most cases. It can be performed safely with excellent early and medium-term results in terms of freedom from cardiac events. Its comparison with percutaneous transluminal techniques and MIDCAB needs to be addressed in further prospective studies.     

一站式复合血管重建技术治疗无保护左主干病变

目的 评价一站式复合血管重建技术治疗无保护左主干病变的可行性和安全性.方法 2007年6月至2009年4月共有14例左主干病变患者接受一站式复合血管重建技术再血管化.其中男性13例,女性1例,平均年龄(60.4±15.4)岁,冠状动脉造影显示左主干开口或体部病变5例,远端或分叉病变11例.手术在一站式复合手术室内进行.通过胸骨下段小切口在心脏不停跳状态下行微创冠状动脉旁路移植术(左乳内动脉至前降支旁路移植),同期对左主干病变和(或)其他非前降支病变行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗.结果 14例患者均顺利进行一站式复合手术.即刻冠状动脉造影显示左乳内动脉桥均通畅.共有25处非前降支病变接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗,其中23处病变置入支架(药物洗脱支架27枚,金属裸支架2枚),其余2处病变仅行冠状动脉球囊扩张术.围术期及随访期间无死亡、围术期心肌梗死、脑卒中或再次再血管化等发生.平均随访7.9个月(1～15个月),所有患者均存活且无再发心绞痛.5例患者术后1年再次接受冠状动脉造影,证实左乳内动脉桥及支架均通畅.结论 一站式复合血管重建技术治疗经选择的无保护左主干病变尤其是合并高危因素者安全可行.     

Outcome of off-pump coronary artery bypass in renal dialysis patients

BACKGROUND: Renal dialysis patients are a subgroup at major operative risk when undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Even though CABG without cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) has decreased the surgical risk and provided good short-term results, the long-term survival seems uncertain. We report here on the long-term outcome of CABG without CPB in renal dialysis patients. METHODS: From 1998 to 2002, 44 renal dialysis patients underwent elective CABG without CPB, including 17 minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) and 27 off-pump CABG (OPCAB) procedures. There were 5 one-vessel, 12 two-vessel and 27 multi-vessel coronary artery disease patients, who mainly had left internal thoracic artery (LITA) to left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) grafting with an additional saphenous vein graft to non-LAD coronaries. RESULTS: All 44 patients were followed up for 44.4 +/- 31.2 months. Three (6.8 %) surgical deaths within 30 days occurred and 25 late mortalities happened over a period of 2 - 79 months. The 5-year cumulative rate of total survival is 38.2 % and the freedom from cardiac death is 70.9 %. Using hazard analysis, old age (> 60 years) and incomplete coronary revascularization was found to significantly affect the total survival. CONCLUSIONS: CABG without CPB provided an acceptable surgical mortality and morbidity. The high incidence of non-cardiac death associated with dialysis complications had an adverse impact on the overall outcome. The LITA bypass operation method combined with intensive care for dialysis complications would hopefully fulfill the goal to improve the short- and long-term results in this subgroup.     

Myocardial "hybrid" revascularisation with minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting combined with coronary angioplasty: preliminary results of a multicentre study

OBJECTIVE—To expand the benefits of the minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) concept to patients with multivessel disease, a hybrid procedure combining surgical revascularisation of the left anterior descending artery with interventional procedures for additional coronary lesions has recently been introduced. Preliminary results in patients undergoing this hybrid procedure are presented.DESIGN AND PATIENTS—Since December 1996, 35 patients (29 male, 6 female, mean (SD) age 56.7 (17) years) underwent a hybrid revascularisation performed as a primary MIDCAB procedure for grafting of the left anterior descending artery with the left internal mammary artery, followed by staged angioplasty and stenting of additional coronary lesions.RESULTS—After MIDCAB grafting the postoperative course was uneventful in all patients. Coronary reangiography after a median of seven days revealed patent and functioning left internal mammary artery grafts in all patients. Applying subsequent percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty and occasional stenting (n = 14), a total of 47 lesions were treated successfully. Procedure related complications did not occur. All patients remained free from angina and no stress ECG changes were recorded.CONCLUSIONS—The preliminary results of this hybrid approach to myocardial revascularisation suggest that this is a safe and effective procedure for complete revascularisation in selected patients with multivessel disease. Elderly and reoperative patients with significant comorbidity may benefit especially from such hybrid procedures by avoiding cardiopulmonary bypass and mid sternotomy.     

Robotically assisted multivessel minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting with the use of bilateral internal thoracic arteries.

This case report presents the robotically assisted multivessel minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting (MIDCAB) technique using the bilateral internal thoracic arteries. A 54-year-old man with multivessel coronary artery disease was considered eligible for a robotically assisted myocardial revascularization. The bilateral internal thoracic arteries were harvested completely in a totally skeletonized fashion through three 1-2-cm-long incisions on the left thoracic wall. A small left anterior thoracotomy was then performed. The left internal thoracic artery was anastomosed to the left anterior descending coronary artery, and the composite radial artery graft from the right internal thoracic artery was sequentially anastomosed to the first diagonal branch, the obtuse marginal branch, and the distal right coronary artery on the beating heart without cardiopulmonary bypass. The harvesting time of the grafts was 66 min, and the total operative time was 5 h 58 min. Postoperative angiography revealed that all grafts were widely patent. The postoperative course was uneventful, and the patient was discharged 10 days after the operation. Robotically assisted MIDCAB using the bilateral thoracic arteries is a safe and effective means of myocardial revascularization for patients with multivesssel disease.     

Comparison of clinical outcomes using stents versus no stents after percutaneous coronary intervention for proximal left anterior descending versus proximal right and left circumflex coronary arteries

Previous studies have demonstrated that proximal left anterior descending (LAD) stenoses have higher rates of restenosis after angioplasty than stenoses in other coronary segments. Stenting strategies may reduce this high rate of LAD restenosis. The study population included 1,289 patients with proximal coronary artery stenoses treated with percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) with or without stents for single-vessel coronary disease between 1994 and 1999. Patients were divided into 4 groups: non-stent PCI in the proximal LAD artery (n = 168), non-stent PCI in proximal right/circumflex artery (n = 217), stent in the proximal LAD artery (n = 364), and stent to proximal right/circumflex artery (n = 540). Procedural success was higher in the stenting groups, but there were no significant differences in the major in-hospital events between the different lesion locations among the groups. At 1-year follow-up, there was no difference in mortality or myocardial infarction between the groups. There was no significant difference in the rate of target lesion revascularization (TLR) in the patients with proximal LAD stents compared with the patients with proximal right/circumflex coronary artery stents (10.1% vs 13.8%, p = 0.11). In the patients who did not receive stents with proximal narrowings, there was a significant increase in TLR in the LAD group compared with the right/circumflex group (21.1% vs 12.5%, p = 0.04). Thus, patients with proximal stenoses treated with non-stenting strategies have lower procedural success than those treated with stenting strategies; the patients with proximal LAD non-stent PCI have significantly higher rates of clinical restenosis than patients with proximal right and circumflex stenoses. A stenting strategy for proximal LAD stenoses appears to attenuate the differences of clinical restenosis noted after non-stent PCI.     

Comparison of three-year outcomes after coronary stenting versus coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with multivessel coronary disease, including involvement of the left anterior descending coronary artery proximally (a subanalysis of the arterial revascularization therapies study trial)

The long-term effect of stents in patients with multivessel disease involving the proximal left anterior descending artery was investigated. At 3 years, there was no difference in the combined incidence of death, stroke, and myocardial infarction in either group, but the need for repeat revascularization was more frequent in the group with stenting than in the group with coronary artery bypass grafting.     

Meta-analysis of four randomized controlled trials on long-term outcomes of coronary artery bypass grafting versus percutaneous coronary intervention with stenting for multivessel coronary artery disease

To provide a quantitative analysis of long-term clinical outcomes, a meta-analysis of 4 randomized controlled trials of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with stenting versus coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) for multivessel coronary artery disease was conducted. The search identified 4 randomized controlled trials of PCI with stenting versus CABG that enrolled patients with multivessel coronary artery disease. In conclusion, pooled analysis demonstrated no statistically significant differences in death, cardiac death, Q-wave myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular accidents, and angina pectoris between PCI with stenting and CABG. However, PCI with stenting was associated with a statistically significant increase in subsequent PCI, subsequent CABG, subsequent revascularization (PCI or CABG), and major adverse cardiovascular events relative to CABG.     

Same-day combined coronary angioplasty and minimally invasive coronary surgery

Integrated myocardial revascularization combines the advantages of angioplasty, stenting, and minimally invasive surgery to revascularize patients with multivessel coronary artery disease without cardiopulmonary bypass. This pilot study showed that a new same-day management strategy, consisting of percutaneous coronary intervention followed immediately by minimally invasive surgery, was feasible and provided complete all-arterial revascularization with minimal surgical trauma, short hospital stay, and excellent early therapeutic result in 14 patients with multivessel coronary disease.