Radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation during mitral valve surgery

Twenty-three patients underwent endocardial radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) during mitral valve procedures with a previously described left atrial lesion pattern. A temperature-controlled 7-coil surgical probe delivered 60-second lesions at 80 degrees C. The left atrial appendage was oversewn after ablation. Ages ranged from 28 to 88 years. Nineteen patients had chronic AF that was present for over 1 year in 74%; 12 patients had rheumatic mitral stenosis. Mean left atrial diameter was 5.4 +/- 0.7 cm. There was 1 operative death unrelated to the ablation, and no strokes or ablation-related complications were observed. At mean follow-up of 32.5 weeks, 86% of the 22 survivors were in sinus rhythm. All 18 patients with left atrial diameter <6 cm are in sinus rhythm. All postoperative atrial flutter was transient, and no patients required subsequent transcatheter ablation. This lesion pattern is safe and effective when applied in the method described here. It appears to be a reasonable alternative to the complete Maze 3 lesion pattern in patients with mitral valve disease.     

Barriers to atrial fibrillation ablation during mitral valve surgery

BackgroundNearly 40% of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing mitral valve surgery do not receive concomitant ablation despite societal guidelines. We assessed barriers to implementation of this evidence-based practice through a survey of cardiac surgeons in 2 statewide quality collaboratives.MethodsAdult cardiac surgeons across 2 statewide collaboratives were surveyed on their knowledge and practice regarding AF ablation. Questions concerning experience, clinical practice, case scenarios, and barriers to implementation were included.ResultsAmong 66 respondents (66 of 135; 48.9%), the majority reported “very comfortable/frequently use” cryoablation (53 of 66; 80.3%) and radiofrequency (55 of 66; 83.3%). Only 12.1% (8/66) were not aware of the recommendations. Approximately one-half of the respondents reported learning AF ablation in fellowship (50.0%; 33 of 66) or attending courses (47.0%; 31 of 66). Responses to clinical scenarios demonstrated wide variability in practice patterns. One-half of the respondents reported no barriers; others cited increased cross-clamp time, excessive patient risk, and arrhythmia incidence as obstacles. Desired interventions included cardiology/electrophysiology support, protocols, pacemaker rate information, and education in the form of site visits, videos and proctors.ConclusionsKnowledge of evidence-based recommendations and practice patterns vary widely. These data identify several barriers to implementation of concomitant AF ablation and suggest specific interventions (mentorship/support, protocols, research, and education) to overcome these barriers.     

Results of endocardial radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation during mitral valve surgery

AIM: The aim of the study is to evaluate the efficacy of thermocontrolled endocardial radiofrequency (RF) ablation for the patients with mitral valve disorder and associated chronic atrial fibrillation during mitral valve replacement operation. METHODS: Between February 2002 and January 2004, 43 patients with mitral valve disease and associated chronic atrial fibrillation underwent mitral valve replacement and thermocontrolled endocardial RF ablation with Cobra RF system flexible probe at Gulhane Military Academy of Medicine, Department of Cardiovascular Surgery. Eighteen of the patients (41.8%) were males, while the remaining 25 (58.2%) were females. The average age of the patients was 44+/-14.21 (18-66) years. Functional capacity of the patients was class II in 15 (34. 9%), class III in 24 (55.8%), class IV in 4 (9.3%) according to the NYHA classification. At the preoperative period all of the patients were evaluated routinely by twelve-lead ECG, chest film and transthoracic echocardiography (TTE). For the patients over 40 years of age, we performed additional coronary angiography to delineate any coronary lesions. The patients were evaluated at months 1, 3, 6 and annually by twelve-lead ECG, TTE and holter monitoring after discharge. RESULTS: There were not any complications related to the performed technique. No operative and hospital mortality were recorded. At the follow-up period for 35 of 43 patients (81.4%) sinus rhythm was restored. The mean follow-up time was 24.3+/-11.2 (12-35) months. CONCLUSION: Endocardial RF ablation especially during mitral valve surgery is a simple technique to be performed. Early and midterm results of the cohort are satisfying.     

Concomitant ablation of atrial fibrillation in rheumatic mitral valve surgery

Objective

Efficacy of atrial fibrillation ablation in rheumatic mitral valve disease has been regarded inferior to that in nonrheumatic diseases. This study aimed to evaluate net clinical benefits by the addition of concomitant atrial fibrillation ablation in rheumatic mitral valve surgery.

Randomized study of surgery for patients with permanent atrial fibrillation as a result of mitral valve disease

BACKGROUND: The Cox Maze procedure has been used to treat atrial fibrillation in patients with mitral valve disease. Recently, ectopic foci, originating in the pulmonary veins, were demonstrated in patients with atrial fibrillation, and the indication was that their arrhythmia could have a focal origin. In the light of this new evidence, a simplified surgical technique to isolate the pulmonary veins was developed to eliminate permanent atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing mitral valve surgery. This study compares three surgical procedures proposed to maintain sinus rhythm after mitral valve surgery. METHODS: A prospective clinical trial of 30 patients with mitral valve disease and permanent atrial fibrillation who had undergone mitral valve surgery were randomized in accordance with the type of surgery used on each: (1). associated en bloc isolation of pulmonary veins, (2). the Maze procedure, or (3). mitral valve correction alone. The preoperative clinical characteristics were similar in the three groups. RESULTS: The overall postoperative complications were similar in all three groups. The cardiopulmonary bypass time and the aortic cross-clamping time were shorter in the control group, but this factor bore no relation to increased morbidity in the intervention groups. The relative risk of atrial fibrillation after surgery was 0.08 in the group undergoing isolation of pulmonary veins (p = 0.010; 95% confidence interval, 0.01 to 0.71) and 0.20 in the Maze group (p = 0.044; 95% confidence interval, 0.04 to 1.02) compared with the control group. CONCLUSIONS: En bloc isolation of pulmonary veins associated with mitral valve surgery appears to be safe and just as effective as the Maze procedure in maintaining sinus rhythm in patients with permanent atrial fibrillation.     

Surgical outcome of the maze procedure for atrial fibrillation in mitral valve disease: rheumatic versus degenerative

BACKGROUND: The results of the maze procedure are known to be less satisfactory in rheumatic mitral disease than in nonrheumatic mitral valve disease. The aim of this study was to determine whether the etiology of mitral valve disease affected surgical outcome. METHODS: From July 1997 to January 2001, 129 consecutive patients with chronic atrial fibrillation associated with mitral valve disease had mitral valve operations with the maze procedure. The underlying mitral pathology was rheumatic in 86 patients (group R) and degenerative in 43 (group D). Echocardiograms and electrocardiograms were performed immediately and then repeated 3 months and 6 months postoperatively. RESULTS: The mean age, duration of atrial fibrillation, and preoperative left atrial size were similar between the groups. There was no operative mortality and no significant difference in cardiopulmonary bypass and aortic cross-clamp times. The sinus conversion rate at 7 days postoperatively was 86% in both groups, and at 6 months it was 95.3% in group R and 97.7% in group D (p > 0.05). The transmitral A wave detection rates in groups R and D at 7 days and 6 months postoperatively were, respectively, 63.1% versus 67.4% and 90.4% versus 91.9% (p > 0.05). The transmitral A wave velocity (cm/second) at the same times (7 days and 6 months postoperatively) was 41.9 +/- 41.6 versus 45.5 +/- 37.7 and 67.8 +/- 38.2 versus 69.8 +/- 35.8 in groups R and D, respectively (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The maze procedure is equally effective in treating chronic atrial fibrillation in patients with either rheumatic or nonrheumatic mitral valve disease in terms of sinus conversion rate and left atrial transport function.     

The significance of atrial fibrillation ablation in patients undergoing mitral valve surgery

Atrial fibrillation is present in close to 50% of all patients undergoing surgery for mitral valve disease.(1-3) However, surgical correction of atrial fibrillation in patients with other cardiac pathology that requires surgical intervention such as mitral valve disease was never considered as a standard approach. The Maze procedure for the treatment of atrial fibrillation was introduced in 1987 and was performed safely in hundreds of patients with excellent outcomes.(4-7) As a result, several centers have begun to combine the Maze procedure with other cardiac procedures, especially mitral valve surgery, without adding undue operative risk to patients.(8) When properly performed, the results with this combined approach have been excellent.(9,10)     

Beating-heart surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation with microwave ablation

BACKGROUND: In this feasibility study, early results are presented of our first series of patients with microwave ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) on the beating heart. METHODS: From June 2001 until December 2001, a total of 24 patients underwent beating-heart epicardial ablation for AF. With a microwave antenna, the left and right pulmonary veins were isolated and connected to each other followed by amputation of the left atrial appendage. Subsequently, patients underwent either off-pump coronary artery bypass graft or valve surgery on pump. The mean age of the patients was 67.4 +/- 6 years. Three patients experienced paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and all others chronic AF. Mean left atrial diameter was 5.4 +/- 0.6 cm, and mean ablation time was 13 min. RESULTS: All procedures but one were completed successfully on the beating heart. All patients were in sinus rhythm after the procedure. A total of 15 patients experienced periods with postoperative AF during hospital stay; 9 of these patients were discharged with AF. All patients received either sotalol or amiodarone. At latest follow-up (3 to 9 months), 20 of 23 patients were in sinus rhythm. CONCLUSIONS: With microwave ablation, electrical isolation of the pulmonary veins can be achieved epicardially without cardiopulmonary bypass support.