Pharmacokinetics of methylphenidate after oral administration of two modified-release formulations in healthy adults

OBJECTIVE: To compare the rate and extent of absorption of DL-threo-methylphenidate (MPH) from two modified-release MPH formulations at their respective recommended starting doses in healthy adult volunteers. DESIGN: Open-label, randomised, crossover, bioavailability study. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty healthy adult male and female volunteers. METHODS: Subjects received single doses of two modified-release formulations of MPH, a 20mg capsule (Ritalin) LA) and an 18 mg tablet (Concerta). A total of 19 plasma samples was collected over 24 hours, and MPH plasma concentrations were determined by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). These values were used to calculate standard noncompartmental pharmacokinetic parameters describing the rate (peak concentration and time to peak concentration) and extent (area under the concentration-time curve, AUC) of absorption of the two formulations. The relative bioavailability of the two drugs was assessed using a 90% confidence interval, based on the lower and upper endpoints of the confidence interval for the ratios of the geometric means (log transformed) being within the 0.80-1.25 equivalence criterion. RESULTS: Nineteen subjects, ten male and nine female, aged 21-34 years completed both treatment phases of the study. The Ritalin LA formulation displayed a distinctly biphasic pharmacokinetic profile, with mean initial peak plasma concentration of 7 microg/L at an average of 2.1 hours after administration and a second peak of 9.3 microg/L occurring at 5.6 hours. In contrast, the profile of the Concerta formulation rapidly reached an initial plateau concentration of 3.4 microg/L at 3.3 hours after administration and a second mean plateau concentration of 5.9 microg/L approximately 6 hours after administration. Substantially more MPH was absorbed from Ritalin LA than from Concert over the first 4 hours; the respective AUC(4) values were 18.5 and 9.3 microg x h/L (p < 0.001). The overall extent of absorption of MPH was similar between the two formulations. Oral clearance was identical between the two dosage forms. CONCLUSIONS: The Ritalin LA formulation exhibited more rapid initial absorption and reached significantly higher peak plasma concentrations compared with the Concerta formulation, although the oral bioavailability of MPH was similar between the two formulations. The Ritalin LA capsule demonstrated a distinctly bimodal plasma concentration-time profile. MPH plasma concentrations resulting from Concerta reached a peak at 6 hours. These results indicate that the recommended starting dose of the Ritalin LA 20 mg capsule formulation provides more rapid absorption and higher peak plasma concentrations than the recommended 18 mg starting dose of the Concerta formulation.     

The absorption of sustained-release methylphenidate formulations compared to an immediate-release formulation

A crossover study in 18 subjects evaluated the plasma concentration-time profile of two different 20 mg sustained-release (SR) methylphenidate (MPH) tablets administered before breakfast, compared to a 10 mg immediate-release (IR) tablet administered before breakfast and again 5 h later, before lunch. Plasma MPH concentrations were determined using a sensitive and precise gas chromatography-mass spectrometry method, incorporating a deuterated internal standard. The mean peak MPH concentration was 6.4 ng ml-1 for the IR product versus 4.6 ng ml-1 and 4.8 ng ml-1 for the two SR formulations. Peak concentrations occurred at 3.3 h after dosing with the SR products, compared to 1.5 h after the first dose of the IR product. The extent of absorption for the three products, as determined from areas under the plasma concentration-time curves, were within 5 per cent of each other. There was no significant difference in rate or extent of absorption between the two SR formulations.     

Similar bioavailability of dexmethylphenidate extended (bimodal) release, dexmethyl-phenidate immediate release and racemic methylphenidate extended (bimodal) release formulations in man

OBJECTIVE: The d-isomer of methylphenidate (d-MPH) is the pharmacologically active part of the racemic mixture of methylphenidate (d,l-MPH), which has been used for decades in the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). A modified release formulation with bimodal release for the pure d-enantiomer (Focalin XR) has been developed to enable a fast onset of action and a sustained activity for once-daily administration. It was intended to achieve a bimodal concentration-time profile as observed after administration of two immediate release Focalin tablets. The pharmacokinetics of this d-MPH bimodal release formulation were compared with a d-MPH immediate release formulation and a similar bimodal release formulation of d,l-MPH in healthy adult volunteers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 25 volunteers received a single 20 mg dose of d-MPH bimodal release formulation, two 10 mg doses of a d-MPH immediate release formulation given 4 h apart and a single 40 mg dose of d,l-MPH bimodal release formulation (1 : 1 ratio for d : l enantiomers). The washout between treatments in this 3-way crossover study was 7 days. RESULTS: All three formulations were well-tolerated at the doses tested. The d-MPH bimodal release formulation generated two distinct d-MPH plasma concentration peaks and both peak concentrations and the time to peak were similar to those of the d-MPH immediate release formulation given 4 h apart and the d,l-MPH bimodal release formulation. The three formulations had Cmax and AUC0-infinity values of 15.5 +/- 4.3 ng/ml and 119 +/- 41 ng x h/ml for bimodal release d-MPH, 17.9 +/- 5.3 ng/ml and 115 +/- 40 ng A h/ml for immediate release d-MPH, and 16.4 +/- 4.4 ng/ml and 122 +/- 36 ng x h/ml for d,l-MPH bimodal release, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In summary, the 20 mg extended (bimodal) release formulation of d-MPH (Focalin XR) demonstrated a bimodal concentration-time profile and was bioequivalent to two 10 mg doses of immediate release d-MPH (Focalin) and was bioequivalent to 40 mg extended (bimodal) release d,l-MPH (Ritalin LA).     

Pharmacokinetics of metformin gastric-retentive tablets in healthy volunteers

The single-dose pharmacokinetics of two gastric-retentive, extended-release tablet formulations of metformin hydrochloride in fed, healthy volunteers were compared with those of the currently marketed immediate-release metformin hydrochloride product. The plasma concentration-time profiles demonstrated extended-release characteristics from the gastric-retentive tablets. The mean bioavailability from each gastric-retentive tablet was approximately 115%, relative to the immediate-release (IR) product. Cmax values were lower and tmax values were greater for the gastric-retentive tablets compared with the IR product. In contrast to conventional extended-release metformin tablets reported in the literature, these gastric-retentive tablets showed extended-release plasma concentration profiles of metformin hydrochloride and increased bioavailability compared with the immediate-release tablet.     

Biowaiver extension potential to BCS Class III high solubility-low permeability drugs: bridging evidence for metformin immediate-release tablet.

The biopharmaceutics classification system (BCS) allows biowaiver for rapid dissolving immediate-release (IR) products of Class I drugs (high solubility and high permeability). The possibility of extending biowaivers to Class III high solubility and low permeability drugs is currently under scrutiny. In vivo bioequivalence data of different formulations of Class III drugs would support such an extension. The objective of this work was to demonstrate the bioequivalence of two marketed IR tablet products of a Class III drug, metformin hydrochloride, that are rapidly dissolving and have similar in vitro dissolution profiles. The effect of race on the systemic exposure of metformin was also explored. A randomized, open-label, two-period crossover study was conducted in 12 healthy Chinese male volunteers. Each subject received a single-dose of 500 mg of each product after an overnight fasting. The plasma concentrations of metformin were followed for 24 h. No significant formulation effect was found for the bioequivalence metrics: areas under concentration-time curve (AUC0-t, AUC0-infinity) and maximal concentration (Cmax). The 90% confidence intervals for the ratio of means were found within the acceptance range of 80-125% for the log-transformed data. Based on these results, it was concluded that the two IR products are bioequivalent. The pharmacokinetic parameters of metformin in Chinese for both products were similar and were in good agreement with those reported for metformin IR tablets in other ethnic populations. This study serves as an example for supporting biowaiver for BCS Class III drugs.     

Bioequivalence study of two capsule formulations containing diacerein 50 mg in healthy human subjects

This study presents the results of a two-way, two-period, two-treatment crossover investigation in 12 healthy Indian male subjects to assess the bioequivalence of two oral formulations containing 50 mg of diacerein (CAS 13739-02-1). Both formulations were administered orally as a single dose separated by a one-week washout period. The content of diacerein in plasma was determined by a validated HPLC method with UV detection. The formulations were compared using the parameters area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC(0-t)), area under the plasma concentration-time curve from zero to infinity (AUC(0-infinity)), peak plasma concentration (Cmax), and time to reach peak plasma concentration (tmax). The results of this study indicated that there were no statistically significant differences between the logarithmically transformed AUC(0-infinity) and Cmax, values of the two preparations. The 90% confidence interval for the ratio of the logarithmically transformed AUC(0-t), AUC(0-infinity) and Cmax were within the bioequivalence limit of 0.8-1.25 and the relative bioavailability of the test formulation was 96.63% of that of the reference formulation. Thus, these findings clearly indicate that the two formulations are bioequivalent in terms of rate and extent of drug absorption.     

Pharmacokinetics and gamma scintigraphy evaluation of two enteric coated formulations of didanosine in healthy volunteers

AIMS: The aims of the study were to evaluate the bioavailability of didanosine from the encapsulated enteric coated beads (1 x 200 mg; enteric beads) and enteric coated mini-tablets (4 x 50 mg; enteric tablet) formulations relative to the chewable/dispersible buffered tablets (2 x 100 mg; buffered tablet), and to study their rate of gastrointestinal transit. METHODS: This was a single-dose, randomized, three-way crossover study in 18 healthy male volunteers. A 200 mg dose of didanosine was given in each period and each formulation contained a gamma radiation-emitting isotope. Pharmacokinetic parameters determined were Cmax, tmax, AUC(0, infinity ) and t1/2. Bioequivalence was assessed using the confidence interval (CI) of 0.80, 1.25 for Cmax and AUC(0, infinity ). Scintigraphic images were recorded and gastrointestinal transit profiles were generated. RESULTS: The point estimate and 90% CI of the ratio of Cmax for the enteric beads and enteric tablet relative to the buffered tablet was 0.71 (0.59, 0.85) and 0.55 (0.46, 0.66), respectively. The tmax was significantly different for the enteric beads (median, 1.33 h) and the enteric tablet (median, 2.83 h) than for the buffered tablet (median, 0.67 h). The AUC(0, infinity ) satisfied the bioequivalence criteria, and the point estimate and 90% CI of the ratio were 1.02 (0.91, 1.15) and 0.92 (0.82, 1.04) for the enteric beads and enteric tablet, respectively. The AUC(0, infinity ) values appeared to be less variable with the enteric beads (% CV = 19%) than with the enteric tablet (% CV = 33%). The t1/2 values were not significantly different between formulations, and the mean values ranged from 1.82 to 1.92 h. Inspection of the individual scintigraphy profiles and concentration-time curves suggested that didanosine was absorbed throughout the small intestine. Gastrointestinal transit parameters were higher for both enteric formulations than for the buffered tablet, indicating slower transit of the enteric formulations. Between the enteric formulations, gastric emptying was slower for the enteric beads than for the enteric tablet; however, plasma didanosine concentrations were observed sooner for the enteric beads, suggesting that the enteric coat for the beads dissolved more rapidly. CONCLUSIONS: The enteric beads and enteric tablet formulations of didanosine were equivalent to the buffered tablet in their extent of absorption. Although the gastric emptying of the enteric tablet was faster, based on the rapid uncoating and the lower variability in AUC, the enteric beads were chosen for further clinical development.     

Bioavailability and In-vitro/in-vivo Correlation for Propranolol Hydrochloride Extended-release Bead Products Prepared Using Aqueous Polymeric Dispersions

The influence of formulation and extrinsic factors has been investigated for the in-vitro release of propranolol hydrochloride from controlled-release beads prepared using aqueous polymeric dispersions, Aquacoat and Surelease. A single-dose three-way crossover bioavailability study of two extended-release experimental formulations (80 mg), Inderal LA (80 mg) and an Inderal immediate-release dosage form (2 × 40 mg) was also conducted and a comparative analysis of pharmacokinetic parameters and the in-vitro release profiles was performed to assess in-vitro/in-vivo correlation. Analysis showed that the in-vitro release data appeared to follow zero-order release kinetics. Intensity of agitation and dissolution method were found to have no significant effect on drug release from beads prepared using either of the coating dispersions studied or Inderal LA. Release of drug from beads coated with Aquacoat was faster in basic media than in acidic media; Surelease-coated beads, however, showed release characteristics that were less sensitive to changes in the pH of the dissolution fluid, and Inderal LA beads showed slower release profiles in acidic medium than in other dissolution media studied. Pharmacokinetic analysis of the data revealed sustained-release absorption characteristics without any evidence of dose-dumping from any of the extended-release dosage forms studied. Regression analysis of the fraction of drug absorbed against the percentage of the drug released in-vitro, at the corresponding times, yielded good in-vitro/in-vivo correlation (level A) for all the extended-release formulations studied. The results showed that there was no dose-dumping from any of extended-release formulations and that the relative bioavailabilities of the experimental formulations were superior to that of the marketed formulation.     

Methylphenidate bioavailability from two extended-release formulations

OBJECTIVE: The objective of these studies was to compare the rate and extent of absorption of d,l-threo-methylphenidate (MPH) from two extended-release products--a capsule formulation containing coated beads and an OROS tablet formulation--in healthy male and female subjects under fasted conditions. MATERIALS: Metadate CD (methylphenidate HCl, USP) Extended-Release Capsules and Concerta (methylphenidate hydrochloride) Extended-Release Tablets. METHODS: Two studies were conducted: (1) A single dose, randomized, two-way crossover study in 36 adults comparing a 20 mg capsule and an 18 mg tablet, and (2) a single dose, randomized, four-way crossover study in 24 adults comparing 2 x 20 mg capsules, one 36 mg tablet, 3 x 20 mg capsules and one 54 mg tablet. Blood samples were collected over 24 hours and MPH plasma concentrations were used to calculate pharmacokinetic parameters for each treatment. Equivalence of pharmacokinetic parameters for comparable doses of the formulations was concluded if the 90% confidence intervals (CI) for the ratio between test and reference means were within the 80-125% equivalence criterion. RESULTS: Both formulations exhibited biphasic plasma concentration-time profiles and were equivalent in terms of total exposure (AUC(0-last) and AUC(0-infinity)). However, early exposure (AUC(0-4) and AUC(0-6), the first maximum measured plasma concentration (C(max-1), and early plasma MPH concentrations (1.5, 3 and 4 hours) were greater with the capsule formulation, while later plasma MPH concentrations (8, 10 and 12 hours) were greater with the tablet formulation (the CIs were outside the 80-125% required for equivalence and p < 0.001 for all). Similar results were obtained whether or not the data were normalized for the difference in total dose. CONCLUSIONS: The two formulations are not bioequivalent. The capsule fonnulation produces greater exposure to MPH and higher MPH concentrations during the first 6 hours following dosing. MPH is frequently used in school children, and this period would correspond to a major part of the school day.     

尼群地平微丸家犬体内药动学研究

目的研究自制尼群地平速释、缓释微丸在家犬体内的药物动力学,并进行相对生物利用度评价。方法分别以尼群地平国产片和日本片为参比制剂,采用高效液相色谱法测定4个制剂的家犬体内血浆药物浓度并绘制平均血药浓度-时间曲线,计算药动学参数并进行方差分析,同时对自制制剂的生物利用度进行了评价。结果尼群地平速释微丸、缓释微丸、国产片和日本片的Tmax依次为0.92±0.14、5.0、1.83±0.29和1.08±0.38h;Cmax依次为187.01±21.23、85.25±13.80、88.31±8.65和160.22±24.34ng.mL-1;AUC0~t依次为665.54±109.07、606.47±130.68、472.44±89.44和659.16±100.05 ng.h.mL-1。以国产片为参比制剂时,自制速释微丸和缓释微丸的相对生物利用度分别为146.92%和135.92%;以日本片为参比制剂时,速释微丸和缓释微丸的相对生物利用度分别为101.04%和91.63%。结论自制速释微丸接近同类产品国外制剂,优于国内制剂;缓释微丸体内作用时间延长,但生物利用度偏低,需进一步改进处方或工艺。     

The relative bioavailability study and fasting and fed states pharmacokinetics of bicalutamide 50-mg tablets in healthy Chinese volunteers

The aim of this study was to evaluate the bioequivalence of a new generic formulation of bicalutamide 50-mg tablets (test) and the available branded formulation (reference) to comply with regulatory criteria for marketing of the test product in China. This single-dose, randomized-sequence, open-label, 2-period crossover study was conducted in 40 healthy male volunteers and consisted of separate fasting and fed phases. A single oral dose of the test or reference formulation was followed by a 6-week washout period, after which subjects received the alternative formulation. Blood samples were collected before dosing and at 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 15, 24, 30, 36, 48, 72, 144, 288, 432 and 576?h after dosing. Plasma samples were separated and assayed for bicalutamide using a selective and sensitive HPLC method with UV detection. The fasting and fed states pharmacokinetic parameters AUC0-576?h, AUC0-∞, Cmax, tmax and t1/2 were determined from plasma concentration-time profile of both formulations. The formulations were considered bioequivalent when the 90% CIs of the geometric mean ratios (test:reference) for Cmax and AUC0-576?h were within the regulatory range of 80-125%. There were no significant increases in bicalutamide Cmax, AUC0-576?h or tmax for either formulation in the fed phase compared with the fasting phase. In both the fasting and fed portions of the study, the 90% CIs for the ratio (test:reference) of log-transformed Cmax and AUC0-576?h were within the acceptance range for bioequivalence.     

Dependence of in vitro-in vivo correlation analysis acceptability on model selections

The objectives of this study were to assess the influence of pharmacokinetic and dissolution model selection on the success of in vitro-in vivo correlation (IVIVC) analysis of fast-, medium-, and slow-dissolving metoprolol tartrate immediate-release tablet formulations. Several different compartmental models were fit to the fast formulation plasma data. Three candidate models with the best fits were ranked 1, 2, and 3 and used to predict AUC and Cmax of the medium and slow formulations. Acceptability of each model to predict the medium and slow formulations was determined using +/- 20% as the limit for acceptable relative prediction error. When the best dissolution models were used, models 1 and 2 each failed to adequately predict Cmax for slow formulation (-26.8% error for model 1 and -20.4% error for model 2). However, the less appropriate model 3 adequately predicted Cmax for slow formulation (-15.1% error). The selection of the dissolution model also determined the outcome of IVIVC analysis, again with a less appropriate model resulting in successful prediction. When the Weibull function was used to characterize dissolution, model 2 failed to adequately predict Cmax for slow formulation (-20.4% error); however, model 2 adequately predicted Cmax for slow formulation when dissolution was characterized using the poorer fitting first-order model (-14.4% error). These results indicate that the success or failure of external validation of these metoprolol tartrate tablets was dependent on the pharmacokinetic and the dissolution models employed. Considering the role of subjectivity in identifying pharmacokinetic and dissolution models, these findings suggest a need to develop objective criteria to identify models a priori to IVIVC analysis.     

In-vitro and in-vivo correlation for two gliclazide extended-release tablets

The aim of this study was to perform an in-vitro-in-vivo correlation (IVIVC) for two 60-mg gliclazide extended-release formulations (Fast and Slow release) given once a day and to compare their plasma concentrations over time. In-vitro release rate data were obtained for each formulation using the USP apparatus II, paddle stirrer at 50 and 100 rev min(-1) in 0.1 M HCl and pH 7.4 phosphate buffer. The similarity factor (f2) was used to analyse the dissolution data. Eighteen healthy subjects participated in the study, conducted according to a completely randomized, two-way crossover design. The formulations were compared using area under the plasma concentration-time curve, AUC(0-infinity), time to reach peak plasma concentration, Tmax, and peak plasma concentration Cmax, while correlation was determined between in-vitro release and in-vivo absorption. A linear correlation model was developed using percent absorbed data versus percent dissolved data from the two formulations. Predicted gliclazide concentrations were obtained by use of a curve fitting equation. Prediction errors were estimated for Cmax and area under the curve AUC(0-infinity) to determine the validity of the correlation. 0.1 M HCl at 50 rev min(-1) was found to be the most discriminating dissolution method. Linear regression analysis of the mean percentage of dose absorbed versus the mean percentage of in-vitro release resulted in a significant correlation (r2 > 0.98) for the two formulations. An average percent prediction error for Cmax was 4.15% for Fast release and 3.99% for Slow release formulation whereas for AUC(0-infinity) it was 6.36% and 4.66% for Fast release and Slow release formulation, respectively.     

Effects of various granulating systems on the bioavailability of naproxen sodium from polymeric matrix tablets

Naproxen sodium and a cellulose ether derivative were granulated with either water or a poly(meth)acrylic acid ester copolymer aqueous dispersion to make three controlled-release matrix dosage forms. The different polymeric matrix systems contained hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (formulation A), hydroxypropyl cellulose:poly(meth)acrylic acid ester copolymer (formulation B), and hydroxypropyl methylcellulose:poly(meth)acrylic acid ester copolymer (formulation C). All three hydrophilic matrix tablets demonstrated identical in vitro dissolution rates. The three controlled-release formulations were compared with a marketed immediate-release naproxen sodium dosage form (formulation D) in a single-dose crossover study in six healthy volunteers. The AUC values for controlled-release dosage forms A and C were larger than those for formulations B and D. However, the reasons why the AUC for formulations A and C is larger than that for formulations B versus D can be explained differently. Formulations A and C more effectively maintain naproxen plasma levels than formulation D by reducing the amount of naproxen unbound to plasma proteins, therefore reducing naproxen available for urinary excretion. Naproxen sodium delivered from formulations A and C is also probably much better absorbed than from that from formulation B, possibly due to less drug entrapment. More importantly, although all three CR formulations had identical in vitro dissolution profiles, naproxen sodium plasma levels were better maintained (based on AUC) in subjects taking formulations A and C, which contained a lower polymer content and did not use hydroxypropyl cellulose. The tmax values were larger for the three controlled-release dosage forms. Also, the Cmax value for the conventional dosage form was nearly twofold higher than that observed for the controlled-release dosage forms.     

Replacement therapy of oral hydrocortisone in adrenal insufficiency: the influence of gastrointestinal factors

BACKGROUND: Replacing glucocorticoids in primary adrenal insufficiency (AI) or Addison's disease (AD) is today based on oral replacement therapy with hydrocortisone in a conventional immediate-release tablet. It is recognised that physiological gastrointestinal factors may have a strong influence on the plasma concentration-time profile of hydrocortisone. Hydrocortisone has a sufficiently high permeability in both the small and large intestine, but in vivo dissolution from the available oral product is limited at higher doses. The short elimination half-life of hydrocortisone (approximately 1.5 h) when given in traditional immediate-release dosage forms requires two or more dose administrations per day, with high peaks and low trough values in between. The endogenous secretion of cortisol from the adrenal cortex follows a distinct diurnal pattern, with increasing and high plasma levels of cortisol early in the morning (approximately 05.00-08.00 h), intermediate levels in the afternoon, low levels in the evening and a cortisol-free interval at night. There is, therefore, a clinical need for an improved drug delivery product that more closely follows the circadian pattern of cortisol in plasma. OBJECTIVE: The pharmaceutical and biopharmaceutical properties of the dosage form containing hydrocortisone will determine intestinal absorption rate and the plasma concentration-time profile of hydrocortisone (cortisol). Factors that cause or result in pharmacokinetic variability should be understood and avoided where possible. METHODS: A literature search was performed with the aim of covering the field of gastrointestinal drug absorption of hydrocortisone in AD. RESULTS/CONCLUSION: Novel oral drug delivery principles for facilitation of once-daily dosing and providing a safe and physiologically based plasma concentration-time profile of hydrocortisone in replacement therapy are discussed. Development of new drug formulations is ongoing and will certainly lead to an improved replacement therapy of AD with hydrocortisone. Of special interest is a therapy based on once-daily treatment and less fluctuating plasma concentrations of hydrocortisone (cortisol).     

Factors affecting the absorption of nilvadipine from disintegration-controlled matrix tablet in dogs

The purpose of this study was to investigate the pharmacokinetics of nilvadipine (NiD) from disintegration-controlled matrix tablets (DCMT). A further purpose was to clarify biological factors that affect the absorption of NiD from DCMT. Two DCMT formulations, which released approximately 80% of NiD in 6 h (DCMT-M) and 10 h (DCMT-S) in vitro, were prepared and compared with immediate-release (IR) tablets. The T(max) and mean residence time from DCMT-M and DCMT-S were significantly longer than those from IR tablets in fasted dogs. The area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) (0-infinity) from DCMT-M in both fed and fasted dogs and IR tablets were comparable in both fed and fasted dogs, indicating complete drug release and absorption without food effect. In contrast, the AUC from DCMT-S was significantly lower than the AUC from IR tablets in fasted dogs. The AUC from DCMT-S increased in fed dogs, but it was still lower than the AUC from IR tablets. In vivo absorption profiles calculated by deconvolution method suggested that the duration of drug absorption from DCMT-S was prolonged from 6 h in fasted condition to 8 h in fed condition, suggesting longer gastro-intestinal (GI) transit time in fed condition allowed longer drug release duration from DCMT-S. Regional drug absorption was also evaluated using NiD solution. The results indicated NiD was almost completely absorbed from canine jejunum, ileum and colon, indicating drug permeation is not a rate-limiting factor of NiD absorption. Therefore, limited GI transit time is the primary factor that affects the drug release from DCMT and subsequent NiD absorption.     

Feasibility of biowaiver extension to biopharmaceutics classification system class III drug products: cimetidine

BACKGROUND: The extension of biowaivers (drug product approval without a pharmacokinetic bioequivalence study) to drugs belonging to Class III of the Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS) is currently a subject of much discussion. OBJECTIVES: To assess the relationship between in vitro dissolution characteristics and in vivo absorption performance of immediate-release (IR) products containing cimetidine, a BCS Class III compound, in human subjects. To evaluate the feasibility and appropriateness of an extension of the biowaiver concept to BCS Class III compounds. STUDY DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS: BCS-conform dissolution tests were carried out on ten marketed cimetidine products from Thailand and Germany, as well as cimetidine tablet formulations containing cimetidine 400mg manufactured by direct compression using methacrylate copolymer (Eudragit) RS PO) as a release-retarding agent to yield three batches with significantly different release profiles. Twelve healthy male subjects were enrolled in a randomised, open-label, single-dose schedule based on a five-way Williams' design balanced for carryover effects. Subjects received the following treatments, with 1-week washout periods between: (i) Tagamet 400mg tablet; (ii) 7.5% methacrylate copolymer cimetidine tablet; (iii) 15% methacrylate copolymer cimetidine tablet; (iv) 26% methacrylate copolymer cimetidine tablet; and (v) Tagamet (300 mg/ 2 mL) intravenous injection. The area under the plasma concentration-time curve from 0 to 12 hours (AUC(12)) and AUC from time zero to infinity (AUC(infinity)), peak plasma concentration (C(max)), absolute bioavailability (F) and mean residence time (MRT) were evaluated and statistically compared among formulations. In vitro-in vivo correlation (IVIVC) analysis was then applied to elucidate the overall absorption characteristics of each tablet formulation. RESULTS: The release properties of the ten marketed cimetidine products were shown to comply with current US FDA criteria for rapidly dissolving drug products. As expected, the in vitro dissolution profiles of the cimetidine tablets containing different percentages of methacrylate copolymer differed considerably from one another. However, in vivo results showed no significant difference in AUC(12), AUC(infinity), C(max) and F between the tablets manufactured with methacrylate copolymer and the innovator. The MRT values obtained from 26% methacrylate copolymer tablets were significantly longer than for the other two methacrylate copolymer formulations and the Tagamet tablets. Furthermore, IVIVC analysis showed that the 26% methacrylate copolymer tablets exhibited dissolution rate-limited absorption, whereas the other formulations showed permeability rate-limited absorption. CONCLUSION: The results of the present study indicated that the absorption of cimetidine from IR tablets is, in general, limited by permeability rather than dissolution. IVIVC analysis demonstrated that only when the release was deliberately retarded (tablets containing 26% methacrylate copolymer), did the dissolution represent the rate-limiting step to drug absorption. On the in vitro side, it seems that 85% dissolution within 30 minutes, as currently required by the US FDA Guidance, is more than sufficient to guarantee bioequivalence of IR cimetidine products. For cimetidine and other BCS Class III drugs with a similar intestinal absorption pattern, application of the biowaiver concept seems to present little risk of an inappropriate bioequivalence decision.     

Single- and multiple-dose pharmacokinetics of an oral once-a-day osmotic controlled-release OROS (methylphenidate HCl) formulation

Methylphenidate is used for the treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). OROS (methylphenidate HCl) is an osmotic controlled-release delivery system designed for once-daily oral dosing. The pharmacokinetics of OROS (methylphenidate HCl) 18 mg qd, sustained-release (SR) methylphenidate 20 mg qd, and the immediate-release (IR) formulation given as three 5 mg doses every 4 hours (tid) were compared in adults. In addition, the single- and multiple-dose pharmacokinetics of the OROS formulation were studied. Following OROS (methylphenidate HCl), there was a gradual increase in the mean methylphenidate plasma concentrations with peak concentrations noted at 6 to 8 hours. With the SR formulation, peak plasma concentrations were noted at approximately 4 hours. Following the IR regimen, methylphenidate plasma concentrations fluctuated in tandem with oral dosing; peak concentrations were noted at 6.5 hours. The terminal half-life of methylphenidate was similar for the three formulations. The dose-normalized methylphenidate Cmax for OROS (methylphenidate HCl) was significantly lower than for IR and SR methylphenidate. The bioavailability of methylphenidate and PPA from OROS (methylphenidate HCl) relative to the IR and SR formulations was complete. Mean methylphenidate AUC and terminal half-life were similar after single (32.9 ng.h/mL and 3.9 hours) and multiple doses (35.2 ng.h/mL and 3.9 hours) of OROS (methylphenidate HCl).     

Effects of Food on the Pharmacokinetics of Methylphenidate

Purpose. To test the hypothesis that the pharmacokinetics of d-meth- ylphenidate (d-MPH) would be altered by food ingested before administration of an immediate release formulation (dl-MPH- IR) but not when food is ingested before a slow release formulation (dl-MPH-SR). Methods. A randomized, four-phase, open label, crossover design was conducted in 24 healthy men who each received, on separate occasions, dl-MPH-IR and dl-MPH-SR taken after an overnight fast and 15 min after a standardized breakfast (20% protein, 21% fat, 59% carbohydrate). Plasma MPH levels were monitored by a validated, stereoselective, GLC-ECD method. Results. For plasma d-MPH, there were significant differences (ANOVA) between dl-MPH-IR and dl-MPH-SR in tmax, Cmax (peak exposure), and Cmax/AUC (sensitive to rate of absorption). Dl-MPH-SR on average delayed tmax from 2.3 to 3.7 h and lowered Cmax 34%. There was no significant difference between the formulations in AUC (extent of absorption). For dl-MPH-IR, food significantly increased Cmax (23%) and AUC (15%) and for dl-MPH-SR the corresponding increases were Cmax (17%) and AUC (14%). After dl-MPH-IR, food delayed average tmax from 2.0 to 2.5 but had no effect on tmax after dl-MPH-SR. There was no effect of food on Cmax/AUC (rate of absorption). Conclusions. Food caused a significant increase in extent of absorption but had no effect on rate of absorption of d-MPH after either dl-MPHIR or dl-MPH-SR.     

Steady-state pharmacokinetics of a novel extended-release metformin formulation

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Metformin is an effective treatment for type 2 diabetes mellitus. The pharmacokinetic characteristics of the conventional immediate-release (IR) formulation of metformin (Glucophage), however, necessitate two- or three-times-daily dosing. Development of a novel extended-release (XR) formulation of metformin (Glucophage XR) using GelShield Diffusion System technology provides a once-daily dosing option. The objective of this study was to assess the steady-state pharmacokinetics of metformin XR tablets. STUDY DESIGN: This was an open-label, multiple-dose, five-regimen, two-sequence clinical study lasting 5 weeks. METHODS: Subjects were 16 healthy volunteers aged 18-40 years. Three 1-week regimens of metformin XR (500, 1000 and 1500 mg once daily) were administered sequentially. Subjects were alternately given either metformin XR 2000 mg once daily or metformin IR 1000 mg twice daily during weeks 4 and 5. The pharmacokinetic properties of metformin XR were assessed on two separate days at steady state and compared with those of metformin IR. RESULTS: Absorption of metformin XR was slower than that of metformin IR (time to maximum plasma concentration = 7 versus 3 hours). Maximum plasma concentrations (Cmax) following the administration of metformin XR 2000 mg once daily was 36% higher than that following the evening dose of metformin IR 1000 mg twice daily. The extent of absorption, determined by area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC), was equivalent for both formulations. The mean accumulation ratio of metformin XR was 1.0, indicating no accumulation with multiple-dose administration. Intrasubject variabilities in Cmax and AUC of metformin were comparable between metformin XR and metformin IR. This novel formulation of metformin XR was well tolerated at single doses up to 2000 mg once daily for 7 days, and adverse events were similar to those reported with metformin IR. CONCLUSION: The pharmacokinetic parameters of metformin XR tablet using GelShield Diffusion System technology were similar to those of metformin IR. Metformin XR was well tolerated at single doses up to 2000 mg once daily.