Self-medication in Poland: the pharmacist’s advisory role in Warsaw

Background

Easy access favours the informative role that pharmacists play in Poland with regard to the proper use of medicinal products as well as preventing illness and promoting health.

Objective

The aim of the present study was to define situations in which patients ask a pharmacist for advice and to identify the most important factors that affect the patients’ decisions in seeking advice from a pharmacist.

Method

n all, 101 patients (69 women, 32 men) aged 19–67 years participated in the study. The study was conducted using a structured interview research method. Patients were asked to answer a set of closed-ended questions related to their habits regarding the purchase of medicines and the factors that affected their decision to seek the advice of a pharmacist.

Main outcome measure

Factors determining the choice to contact a pharmacy.

Results

Patients seldom asked pharmacists for advice: 77 of the patients “rarely” or “never” went to a pharmacy to consult the pharmacist. When patients did ask the pharmacist for advice, it was mainly concerning the choice of over-the-counter medicines. The most important reason for patients visiting a pharmacy for advice was the large number of pharmacies in Poland and their ease of access; the long queues of people in busy pharmacies and the lack of confidentiality in the pharmacy were considered negative factors.

Conclusion

The current advisory role of pharmacists in Poland seems of minimal importance to the public.     

Complementary or alternative? Patterns of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) use among Finnish children

Purpose

The aim of this study was to measure patterns of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) use among Finnish children and to explore whether CAM use among children is mainly complementary or alternative.

Methods

We carried out a cross-sectional population-based survey in spring 2007. The study population consisted of a representative sample (n?=?6,000) of Finnish children under 12?years of age. A questionnaire was sent to their parents, and 4,032 questionnaires were returned (response rate 67?%). Pearson’s chi-square test and logistic regression analysis were conducted to measure factors associated with CAM use.

Results

The prevalence of CAM use among children was 11?%. Fish oils and fatty acids (6?%) followed by probiotics (4?%) were the most commonly reported CAMs used. Being the first born, using vitamins and having at least one symptom predicted the use of CAMs. Parental use of vitamins and CAMs were also associated with CAM use among children. In the preceding 2 days, 3 % of children in the study had used only CAMs, and 7?% had used a CAM concomitantly with prescribed and/or over-the-counter medicines.

Conclusions

Our results indicate that the use of CAMs among Finnish children is mainly for improving health and alleviating symptoms, especially in families where at least one parent also uses these modalities. CAMs were mainly used as complementary rather than as an alternative to conventional care. Healthcare professionals should be aware of this complementary use of CAMs and medicines in patients to avoid risks of potential interactions.     

Relationship between adolescents’ and their parents’ attitudes toward medicines and awareness of the risk of medicines

Background When they reach adolescence, children begin to independently use medicine without their parents’ supervision, but parents usually still want to be involved in their drug therapy. Objective The aim of this study was to investigate how parental attitudes and awareness toward medicine relate to adolescents’ attitudes and awareness. Setting Twelve secondary schools in different regions of the Slovak Republic. Method Adolescents and parents responded to a questionnaire, and the answers were paired and analysed. Parental and adolescents’ attitudes toward medicines and awareness of the risk of medicines were measured using a five-point Likert scale. Main outcome measure The strength of the relationship between parents’ and their adolescent children’s level of agreement with statements about medicines. Results There were significant differences between parents? and adolescents’ mean Likert scores for statements about their attitudes toward medicines and their awareness of the risk of medicines (p?<?0.05). Parents and adolescents were not fully aware of the risks of cough medicine (73.5% and 76.1%), antihistamines (32.7% and 52.1%), painkillers (33.6% and 47%) and combining medicines (25.2% and 40.4%). More than half of the parents and adolescents had a positive perception of the effectiveness of medication and believed that taking medicine would not hurt adolescents. Parents’ and adolescents’ responses to the statements were directly proportional (r?=?0.94, p?<?0.001). Conclusion The analysis revealed a relationship between Slovakian adolescents’ and their parents’ attitudes and awareness toward medicine; it highlighted areas of adolescents’ and parents’ education about the proper use of medications.     

Knowledge,attitudes and beliefs of patients and carers regarding medication adherence: a review of qualitative literature

Purpose

The aim of this review is to cohere evidence on the knowledge, attitudes and beliefs of patients and carers regarding medication adherence. Medication adherence refers to “the extent to which the patient’s action matches the agreed recommendations”. Medication adherence is vital in preventing, managing and curing illnesses and, hence, is linked with positive health outcomes.

Methods

A search was conducted using the following databases: CINAHL, Embase, PubMed and Web of Knowledge from inception to November 2013. Titles and abstracts were screened for inclusion in the review according to pre-defined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Studies were assessed for quality, and data were extracted into a data extraction form. Results were analysed thematically.

Results

The final results included 34 articles. Eight analytical themes were identified: (i) beliefs and experiences of medicines, (ii) family support and culture, (iii) role of and relationship with health-care practitioners, (iv) factors related to the disease, (v) self-regulation, (vi) communication, (vii) cost and (viii) access. The theme, “beliefs and experiences of medicines”, was present in 33 studies, with many discussing the influence that side effects have on medication adherence.

Conclusions

There are a number of variables that impact upon the knowledge, attitudes and beliefs of patients and carers regarding medication adherence. This review presents an overview of the analytical themes which offers the opportunity to examine interventions and their relative efficacies to increase medication adherence.     

Pharmacy student decision making in over-the-counter medicine supply: A critical incident study

Background

Various factors influence decision making in over-the-counter (OTC) medicine consultations, yet limited studies have focused, in-depth, on the thought process of pharmacy staff. This includes pharmacy students as pharmacists-in-training.

Ethical responsibilities of pharmacists when selling complementary medicines: a systematic review

Objective

The widespread sale of complementary medicines in community pharmacy raises important questions regarding the responsibilities of pharmacists when selling complementary medicines. This study reviews the academic literature that explores a pharmacist's responsibilities when selling complementary medicines.

Methods

International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, Embase, PubMed, Cinahl, PsycINFO and Philosopher's index databases were searched for articles written in English and published between 1995 and 2017. Empirical studies discussing pharmacists’ practices or perceptions, consumers’ expectations and normative studies discussing ethical perspectives or proposing ethical frameworks related to pharmacists’ responsibilities in selling complementary medicines were included in the review.

Key findings

Fifty‐eight studies met the inclusion criteria. The majority of the studies discussing the responsibilities of pharmacists selling complementary medicines had an empirical focus. Pharmacists and consumers identified counselling and ensuring safe use of complementary medicines as the primary responsibilities of pharmacists. No formal ethical framework is explicitly employed to describe the responsibilities of pharmacists selling complementary medicines. To the degree any ethical framework is employed, a number of papers implicitly rely on principlism. The studies discussing the ethical perspectives of selling complementary medicines mainly describe the ethical conflict between a pharmacist's business and health professional role. No attempt is made to provide guidance on appropriate ways to resolve the conflict.

Conclusion

There is a lack of explicit normative advice in the existing literature regarding the responsibilities of pharmacists selling complementary medicines. This review identifies the need to develop a detailed practice‐specific ethical framework to guide pharmacists regarding their responsibilities when selling complementary medicines.

     

An investigation into the effect of advice from the Scottish Medicines Consortium on the use of medicines in Scotland's Health Service

AIMS

The aims of the study were to determine the effect of advice from the Scottish Medicines Consortium (SMC) on the use of medicines within Scotland''s National Health Service (NHS) and generate hypotheses that may explain differences in the impact of advice on the use of individual medicines.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of medicine advice issued between January 2002 and December 2005 was performed. The inclusion criterion was medicines with a ‘not recommended for use’ decision (NRD) from the SMC (57 out of 207 medicines submitted). The exclusion criteria were medicines used predominately in secondary care and medicines with multiple indications. In total, 20 medicines fulfilled these criteria. The volume of prescribing was measured by each medicine''s gross ingredient cost to the prescribing budget.

RESULTS

Before the SMC published advice there was use, though limited, of all 20 medicines. After an NRD, the pattern of use was variable, with the use of some medicines stabilizing or declining but others increasing. We identified factors to help explain unexpected use in some cases. These included delays between medicine launch and initial SMC advice, the publication of conflicting advice from different national bodies and failure to engage with relevant clinical experts early in the medicine review process.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates the complex relationship between advice following health technology assessment and change in clinical practice. When this study was done there were significant limitations in the collection of prescribing data within the NHS, which recent changes promise to improve.     

Healthcare providers’ experiences with adverse drug reactions and adherence challenges in antiretroviral therapy of HIV patients in the Eastern Cape Province, South Africa

Purpose

To gain insight into the experiences and handling of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) by the staffs of public primary healthcare (PHC) clinics in Eastern Cape Province, South Africa, as well as their perceptions of related adherence challenges in the treatment and follow-up of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive patients.

Methods

Healthcare providers working at the PHC level in the public sector in the study area were approached and asked to participate in focus group discussions (FGDs). Seven FGDs were conducted with 32 healthcare providers (9 nurses, 23 auxiliary staff). Questions introduced by the moderator of each FGD were freely discussed by the participants. Discussions were audio-recorded and subjected to thematic content analysis.

Results

Several challenges in the treatment and follow-up of patients on ART were identified. These include: (1) lack of training of healthcare providers in PHC clinics to confidently identify, manage and treat the ADRs HIV-positive patients receiving ART; (2) patients’ difficulty in communicating information on ADRS; (3) insufficient pharmacovigilance; (4) role of poverty.

Conclusion

Both nurses and auxiliary staff expressed lack of knowledge and confidence regarding ADRs in HIV patients and management of this. More emphasis is warranted on training the healthcare providers to identify ADRs and provide adequate advice for continued treatment of patients experiencing potential drug related problems.