Bilateral subthalamic nucleus stimulation in advanced Parkinson’s disease

Objective To assess the long-term efficacy and safety of chronic bilateral stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) in patients with advanced Parkinson’s disease (PD). Methods 36 consecutive patients with idiopathic Parkinson’s disease treated with bilateral stimulation of the STN were studied. Parkinsonian status was assessed preoperatively and at 1 and 3 years postoperatively using the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) and neuropsychological evaluation in on and off-medication / on and off stimulation conditions. Results At 3 years follow-up, STN stimulation reduced the UPDRS motor score by 54.2 % compared to baseline in the off-medication conditions. Tremor, rigidity, bradykinesia, postural stability, and gait improved by 72.2 %, 62.4 %, 56.8 %, 40.5 % and 45.3 %, respectively. UPDRS part II scores were reduced by 41.4 %. The overall dopaminergic drugs dose was reduced by 48.6 % after surgery and four patients were no longer taking antiparkinsonian medication at three years. However, axial dopa-unresponsive signs worsened in some patients. The most frequent transient adverse event consisted in mood disorders in 23 patients. Conclusions Our data demonstrate that: 1) bilateral STN stimulation is relatively safe, improves the motor symptoms and drug-related motor complications of PD, and reduces the daily dosage of medication; 2) this benefit is sustained over time despite the occurrence of axial doparesistant signs in some patients.     

Subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation changes speech respiratory and laryngeal control in Parkinson’s disease

Adequate respiratory and laryngeal motor control are essential for speech, but may be impaired in Parkinson’s disease (PD). Bilateral subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN DBS) improves limb function in PD, but the effects on respiratory and laryngeal control remain unknown. We tested whether STN DBS would change aerodynamic measures of respiratory and laryngeal control, and whether these changes were correlated with limb function and stimulation parameters. Eighteen PD participants with bilateral STN DBS were tested within a morning session after a minimum of 12 h since their most recent dose of anti-PD medication. Testing occurred when DBS was on, and again 1 h after DBS was turned off, and included aerodynamic measures during syllable production, and standard clinical ratings of limb function. We found that PD participants exhibited changes with DBS, consistent with increased respiratory driving pressure (n = 9) and increased vocal fold closure (n = 9). However, most participants exceeded a typical operating range for these respiratory and laryngeal control variables with DBS. Changes were uncorrelated with limb function, but showed some correlation with stimulation frequency and pulse width, suggesting that speech may benefit more from low-frequency stimulation and shorter pulse width. Therefore, high-frequency STN DBS may be less beneficial for speech-related respiratory and laryngeal control than for limb motor control. It is important to consider these distinctions and their underlying mechanisms when assessing the impact of STN DBS on PD.     

Subthalamic deep brain stimulation affects heading perception in Parkinson’s disease

Journal of Neurology - Parkinson’s disease (PD) presents with visuospatial impairment and falls. It is critical to understand how subthalamic deep brain stimulation (STN DBS) modulates...     

Subthalamic nucleus versus pedunculopontine nucleus stimulation in Parkinson disease: synergy or antagonism?

Stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) improves the cardinal features of Parkinson disease (PD). However, its efficacy on gait disorders is less satisfying in the long term. In recent years, the pedunculopontine (PPN) nucleus has emerged as a possible promising deep brain stimulation target for gait disorders in PD. In this review, we examine whether STN and PPN act synergistically or antagonistically. Results suggest that the combination of STN and PPN stimulations leads to a significant further improvement in gait as compared with STN stimulation alone, but additive effects on the classical motor triad are questionable. Thus, they highlight the specificity of STN stimulation over PPN’s for the PD cardinal features and the specificity of PPN stimulation over STN for gait disorders. In addition, low-frequency stimulation of the PPN may improve alertness. The additive rather than potentiating effects of STN and PPN stimulations suggest that they may be mediated by distinct pathways. Nevertheless, considering the inconsistencies in published results regarding the influence of PPN stimulation on gait disorders, work is still needed before one can know whether it will convert into a standard surgical treatment and to decipher its place beside STN stimulation.     

Subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation suppresses neuroinflammation by Fractalkine pathway in Parkinson’s disease rat model

Subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) is widely used to treat patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD), and recent studies have shown that it is more beneficial for early stages, suggesting a potential neuroprotective effect. And the neuroinflammation plays an indispensable role in progress of PD. However, the underlying mechanisms are not well understood. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of STN-DBS on neuroinflammation and the potential pathway. To address this question, we established a rat PD model by unilateral 6-hydroxydopamine injection into the left striatum and implanted stimulation leads into the ipsilateral STN to deliver electrical stimulation for a week. The neuroprotective effects of STN-DBS were examined by molecular biology techniques, including western blotting, immunohistochemistry and so on. We found that motor deficits were alleviated by STN-DBS, with increased survival of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra (SN). Furthermore, STN-DBS decreased Fractalkine (CX3CL1) and its receptor (CX3CR1) expression. Meanwhile, the suppressed microglia activation and nuclear factor-κB expression, decrease in the levels of pro-inflammatory cytokine interleukin (IL)-1β and IL-6 and increase in anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-4, downregulated IL-1 receptor, extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) and cleaved-caspase3 were also observed in SN of PD models received STN-DBS. In conclusion, we observed a significant association between the suppressed neuroinflammation and STN-DBS, which may be attributed to CX3CL1/CX3CR1 signaling. These results provide novel insight into the mechanistic basis of STN-DBS therapy for PD.     

Long-term follow-up of subthalamic nucleus stimulation in glucocerebrosidase-associated Parkinson’s disease

Journal of Neurology -     

Does subthalamic nucleus stimulation induce apathy in Parkinson’s disease?

Background Subthalamic Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation (STN-DBS) has been shown to significantly improve motor symptoms in advanced Parkinson’s disease (PD). Only few studies, however, have focused on the non-motor effects of DBS. Methods A consecutive series of 15 patients was assessed three months before (M-3), then three months (M3) and six months (M6) after surgery. Mean (± SD) age at surgery was 59.7 (7.6). Mean disease duration at surgery was 12.2 (2.8) years. The Mini International Neuropsychiatric Inventory was used to assess psychiatric disorders three months before surgery. Depression was evaluated using Montgomery and Asberg Rating Scale (MADRS). Anxiety was evaluated using the AMDP system (Association for Methodology and Documentation in Psychiatry). Apathy was particularly evaluated using the Apathy Evaluation Scale (AES) and the Starkstein Scale. All these scales were performed at every evaluation. Results Apathy worsened at M3 and M6 after STN-DBS in comparison with the preoperative evaluation: the AES mean score was significantly impaired between the preoperative (38.4±7.1) and both the postoperative M3 (44.6±9.5, p = 0.003) and M6 scores (46.0±10.9, p = 0.013). Significant worsening of apathy was confirmed using the Starkstein scale. There was no evidence of depression: the mean MADRS score did not differ before surgery (9.1±7.4) and at both M3 (8.6±8.2) and M6 (9.9±7.7) after STN-DBS. The anxiety level did not change between preoperative (9.4±9.2) and both M3 (5.5±4.5) and M6 (6.6±4.6) postoperative states. Conclusion Although STN-DBS constitutes a therapeutic advance for severely disabled patients with Parkinson’s disease, we should keep in mind that this surgical procedure may contribute to the inducing of apathy. Our observation raises the issue of the direct influence of STN- DBS on the limbic system by diffusion of stimulus to the medial limbic compartment of STN.     

Thalamic,subthalamic nucleus and internal pallidum stimulation in Parkinson’s disease

The limits of drug therapy in severe forms of Parkinson’s disease have lead to a renewal of functional neurosurgery of the basal ganglia and the thalamus. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of these structures was developed with the aims of reducing the morbidity of surgery and of offering an adaptative treatment. DBS was first applied to the thalamus in patients with severe tremor. Tremor of the hemibody is greatly reduced by stimulation of the contralateral electrode in 85% of the cases. There is little change in other symptoms. However, motor fluctuations and dyskinesias are a more frequent problem than severe tremor, in attempt to treat these symptoms, DBS has recently been applied to the subthalamic nucleus (STN) and the internal pallidum (GPi). STN stimulation greatly decreases off motor symptoms and motor fluctuations, which allows a reduction of drug dosage and consequently of dyskinesias. GPi stimulation decreases dyskinesias in most patients, but the effect on off motor symptoms is more variable from one series to another, from very good to nil. The severe morbidity of DBS applied to these 3 targets is low. Comparative studies of the cost and the efficacy of DBS and lesions applied to these different targets are now required.

     

Deep brain stimulation in Parkinson’s disease

Throughout the past decade, there has been a marked increase in surgical therapies, primarily deep brain stimulation (DBS), for the treatment of advanced Parkinson’s disease (PD). DBS of the thalamus has been shown to be effective in reducing parkinsonian tremor; however, it is not the treatment of choice for PD given the progression of other symptoms such as rigidity and bradykinesia. Stimulation of the globus pallidus or the subthalamic nucleus is safe and efficacious in the long-term treatment of all cardinal symptoms of PD, and they are currently the surgeries of choice. Serious adverse events with DBS can occur in 1% to 2% of patients, infection in 5% to 8% of patients, and hardware complications in approximately 25% of patients. Complications associated with DBS are related to the experience of the surgical center. Referring physicians and patients should be aware of the number of surgical procedures and complication rates of any prospective surgical center.     

Tremor reduction by subthalamic nucleus stimulation and medication in advanced Parkinson’s disease

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) has proved to be effective for tremor in Parkinson’s disease (PD). Most of the recent studies used only clinical data to analyse tremor reduction. The objective of our study was to quantify tremor reduction by STN DBS and antiparkinsonian medication in elderly PD patients using an objective measuring system. Amplitude and frequency of resting tremor and re-emergent resting tremor during postural tasks were analysed using an ultrasound-based measuring system and surface electromyography. In a prospective study design nine patients with advanced PD were examined preoperatively off and on medication, and twice postoperatively during four treatment conditions: off treatment, on STN DBS, on medication, and on STN DBS plus medication. While both STN DBS and medication reduced tremor amplitude, STN DBS alone and the combination of medication and STN DBS were significantly superior to pre- and postoperative medication. STN DBS but not medication increased tremor frequency, and off treatment tremor frequency was significantly reduced postoperatively compared to baseline. These findings demonstrate that STN DBS is highly effective in elderly patients with advanced PD and moderate preoperative tremor reduction by medication. Thus, with regard to the advanced impact on the other parkinsonian symptoms, STN DBS can replace thalamic stimulation in this cohort of patients. Nevertheless, medication was still effective postoperatively and may act synergistically. The significantly superior efficacy of STN DBS on tremor amplitude and its impact on tremor frequency in contrast to medication might be explained by the influence of STN DBS on additional neural circuits independent from dopaminergic neurotransmission. Received in revised form: 27 April 2006     

Bilateral subthalamic nucleus stimulation in advanced Parkinson’s disease: Five year follow-up

Objective   To assess the long-term efficacy and safety of bilateral subthalamic nucleus (STN) stimulation in patients with advanced Parkinson’s disease (PD). Methods   42 consecutive patients with idiopathic PD treated with bilateral STN stimulation were enrolled. Parkinsonian status, medication intake and neuropsychological evaluation were assessed preoperatively and at 1 and 5 years postoperatively in on and off medication/on and off stimulation conditions. Results   23 patients could be followed-up 5 years after surgery. In the remaining cases, 5 died, 1 could not be assessed because of device removal for infection, 1 decided not to be stimulated, and 11 were lost of follow-up (one because of a liver carcinoma and the others because they refused the formal four conditions of assessment). STN stimulation reduced the UPDRS motor score by 55 % compared to baseline in the offmedication conditions. Tremor, rigidity, bradykinesia, postural stability, and gait improved by 74 %, 66 %, 59 %, 17 % and 37 %, respectively. UPDRS part II scores were reduced by 38 %. The dopaminergic treatment daily dose was reduced by 54.4 % after surgery. Axial dopa-unresponsive signs worsened in some patients. Among the 42 initial patients we observed the following: 2 brain hemorrhages, 3 infections of the device, 2 phlebitis and 1 pulmonary embolism. In addition, 2 patients needed a repositioning of the electrode. Among the 23 patients followed at 5 years, long lasting side effects consisted in dysarthria (56 %), depression (39 %), eyelid opening apraxia (30.4 %) and apathy (4.3 %). Conclusions   Our data confirm that bilateral STN stimulation is beneficial in the long-term for PD patients but does not prevent disease progression and the occurence of axial levodopa unresponsive signs in some patients.     

Low-frequency subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation for axial symptoms in advanced Parkinson’s disease

Axial symptoms such as freezing of gait and falls are common manifestations of advanced Parkinson’s disease (PD) and are partially responsive to medical treatment. High-frequency (≥130 Hz) deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) is highly efficacious in ameliorating appendicular symptoms in PD. However, it is typically less effective in improving axial symptomatology, especially in the long term. We have studied the effects of low-frequency stimulation (LFS) (≤80 Hz) for improving speech, gait and balance dysfunction in the largest patient population to date. PD patients with bilateral STN-DBS and resistant axial symptoms were switched from chronic 130 Hz stimulation to LFS and followed up to 4 years. Primary outcome measures were total motor UPDRS scores, and axial and gait subscores before and after LFS. Bivariate analyses and correlation coefficients were calculated for the different conditions. Potential predictors of therapeutic response were also investigated. Forty-five advanced PD patients who had high frequency stimulation (HFS) for 39.5 ± 27.8 consecutive months were switched to LFS. LFS was kept on for a median period of 111.5 days before the assessment. There was no significant improvement in any of the primary outcomes between HFS and LFS, although a minority of patients preferred to be maintained on LFS for longer periods of time. No predictive factors of response could be identified. There was overall no improvement from LFS in axial symptoms. This could be partly due to some study limitations. Larger prospective trials are warranted to better clarify the impact of stimulation frequency on axial signs.     

Lack of differential motor outcome with subthalamic nucleus region stimulation in Parkinson’s disease

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has emerged as a viable therapy for Parkinson’s disease (PD). The impact of subthalamic nucleus (STN) lead placement (lateral versus medial) on motor outcome, however, has not been systematically evaluated. Forty-eight patients with PD underwent STN-DBS surgery and were evaluated postoperatively for 48 weeks for motor improvement as measured by the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) part III (standardized motor examination) and levodopa equivalent daily dose (LEDD). Postoperative MRI was used to identify the location of the active stimulating contact and motor outcome was analyzed. STN-DBS was associated with significant improvement in motor outcome as determined by a reduction in the UPDRS part III subscore from 34.44 ± 1.29 at baseline to 18.76 ± 1.06 at end visit (p < 0.0001) and a reduction in LEDD from 1721 ± 152 mg/day at baseline to 1134 ± 119 mg/day at end visit (p = 0.0024). Patients with stimulating contacts in the medial STN compared to the lateral STN did not demonstrate any significant differences in motor outcome (UPDRS, p = 0.5811; LEDD, p = 0.7341). No significant differences were found in motor outcome between patients with STN stimulation compared to stimulation of surrounding fiber tracts (p = 0.80). No significant difference in stimulation voltage was noted with respect to lead location. Our study did not find a significant effect for the location of active contact and motor outcome neither within the subregions of the STN nor between the STN and surrounding fibers. Further research is needed to better understand the neurophysiological basis for these results.     

Chronic subthalamic nucleus stimulation and striatal D2 dopamine receptors in Parkinson’s disease

Abstract. Context: Subthalamic nucleus (STN) stimulation mechanism of action remains a matter for debate. In animals, an increased striatal dopamine (DA) release due to STN stimulation has been reported. Objective: To determine in Parkinsons disease (PD) patients using positron emission tomography (PET) and [¹¹C]-Raclopride, whether STN stimulation induces a striatal DA release. Methods: Nine PD patients with bilateral STN stimulation were enrolled and underwent two [¹¹C]-Raclopride PET scans. The scans were randomly performed in off and on stimulation conditions. Striatal [¹¹C]-Raclopride binding potential (BP) was calculated using regions of interest and statistical parametric mapping. Results: For PD patients, the mean [¹¹C]-Raclopride BP (± SD) were, in Off stimulation condition: 1.7 ± 0.3 for the right caudate nucleus, 1.8 ± 0.4 for the left caudate nucleus, 2.6 ± 0.5 for the right putamenand 2.6 ± 0.5 for the left putamen. In On stimulation condition: 1.7 ± 0.4 for the right caudate nucleus, 1.9 ± 0.5 for the left caudate nucleus, 2.8 ± 0.7 for the right putamen and 2.7 ± 0.8 for the left putamen. No significant difference of BP related to the stimulation was noted. Conclusion: STN stimulation does not produce significant variations of striatal DA release as assessed by PET and [¹¹C]-Raclopride.     

Pedunculopontine nucleus deep brain stimulation changes spinal cord excitability in Parkinson’s disease patients

Bilateral peduncolopontine nucleus (PPN) and subthalamic nucleus (STN) deep brain stimulation (DBS) was performed in six-advanced Parkinson’s disease (PD) patients. We report the effect of both PPN-DBS (25 Hz) and STN-DBS (185 Hz) on patient spinal reflex excitability by utilizing the soleus-Hoffman reflex (HR) threshold. Compared to controls (n = 9), patients showed an increase of HR-threshold, which was scarcely affected by levodopa, but significantly reduced by DBS. In particular, we found that PPN-DBS alone, or plus STN-DBS induced a complete recovery of HR-threshold up to control values. The HR-threshold changes, although do not allow to investigate the contribution of specific intraspinal pathways, suggest that PPN may play a key-role in modulating spinal excitability in PD possibly by improving the basal ganglia-brainstem descending system activity.