Long-term morbidity of adjuvant infradiaphragmatic irradiation in patients with testicular cancer and implications for the treatment of stage I seminoma

Long-term abdominal or urological morbidity and second malignancies in 289 surviving patients with infradiaphragmatic adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) for testicular cancer between 1950 and 1988 are analysed by retrospective chart review. After RT with single doses between 1.5 and 2.0 Gy and a total dose between 30 and 35 Gy, we did not observe any peptic ulcer nor other abdominal or urological long-term morbidity, except second tumours. The cumulative incidence of 16 second extratesticular malignancy was (in years after RT): 0.4% (4 years), 1.3% (9 years), 4.5% (14 years), 6.3% (19 years), 7.5% (24 years), 15.6% (29 years) and 23.6% (35 years). The ratio of observed to expected incidence of extratesticular malignancies did not differ significantly from unity; only the frequency of penile cancer (n = 2) was somewhat higher than expected. The cumulative risk of bilateral testicular cancer was 4.8% with no difference between patients with seminoma or non-seminomatous germ cell tumours. In a recent group of 128 patients with a stage I seminoma staged and treated between 1978 and 1988 by modern standard, there was no recurrence.     

Is adjuvant chemotherapy necessary for patients with stage B1 testicular cancer?

Controversy exists concerning the role of adjunctive chemotherapy in patients with regional nodal involvement. A randomized study reported a 48% relapse rate for patients with positive nodes (stage B1 or stage B2), all of whom were salvaged by full-dose platinum-based chemotherapy. In a series of patients with positive nodes who received two cycles of adjunctive chemotherapy postoperatively, the relapse rate was only 2%. In order to evaluate the effect of retroperitoneal lymph node dissection on relapse rates in patients with stage B1 testicular cancer, a retrospective review of a series of 39 patients was performed. Criteria for inclusion included pathologic stage B1 (less than six positive nodes, located in the primary landing site, with no node greater than 2 cm in diameter and no extracapsular lymph node extension). Patients who fulfilled the criteria along with normalization of tumor markers were followed-up expectantly after retroperitoneal lymph node dissection. Thirty-nine patients were followed from 1 to 10 years with the median duration of follow-up of 3.5 years. Ten of the 39 patients had modified retroperitoneal lymph node dissections with preservation of antegrade ejaculation. The other 29 had full retroperitoneal lymph node dissections. Three relapses were seen, one patient with retrocrural and pulmonary metastases and two patients with pulmonary metastases only for a relapse rate of 8% (three of 39). Patients with stage B2 disease received adjunctive chemotherapy with two or three cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy. We conclude that retroperitoneal lymph node dissection alone is adequate treatment for the majority of patients with pathologic stage B1 testicular cancer. In that subset of patients, adjunctive chemotherapy should be reserved for relapse.     

Treatment-related ureteral cancer following stage II testicular seminoma

We report two cases of left ureteral carcinoma that may have been related to prior radiotherapy and anticancer chemotherapy for stage II testicular seminoma. Both patients had undergone radiotherapy (60 Gy) and cisplatin-based chemotherapy, one 17 years before the present presentation and the other 24 years earlier. They underwent retroperitoneoscopy-assisted left nephroureterectomy under a diagnosis of left upper ureteral cancer, established by means of ureteroscopy and brush biopsy. The urologic and radiologic outcomes have been satisfactory after more than 2 years of follow-up. Recently, some investigators have reported that testicular cancer survivors are at significantly increased risk of solid tumors for at least 35 years after treatment. Young patients may have a high risk of cancer when they reach an advanced age.     

Surveillance following orchidectomy for stage I testicular seminoma.

An analysis of the primary tumour histopathology was performed on 103 patients managed by orchidectomy and surveillance for stage I seminoma. Patients have been followed for 14-141 months (median 62 months) after orchidectomy. Seventeen patients relapsed, the probability of remaining relapse free at 5 years being 82% (95% confidence intervals, 74%-88%). No patients died of progressive germ cell tumours. The only significant histological factor predicting relapse was the presence of lymphatic and vascular invasion. Four of 42 patients with neither lymphatic or vascular invasion recurred, nine of 53 patients with either lymphatic or vascular invasion recurred and three of eight cases with both lymphatic and vascular invasion recurred (P = 0.05-trend). Though initial recurrence was usually of moderate volume and confined to para-aortic nodes, eight patients were treated with chemotherapy either because of the extent of their initial relapse (four cases), or because of subsequent relapse (four cases). In view of the difficulties of identifying patients at risk and of detecting early relapse, surveillance for stage I seminoma should remain a research protocol.     

Surgery versus surveillance in stage I non-seminoma testicular cancer

Today, the standard treatment for patients with clinical Stage I non-seminomatous testicular germ cell tumors (NSTGCT) following orchidectomy is either primary retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) or close surveillance with cisplatin-based polychemotherapy in case of a relapse. Both treatment modalities provide excellent overall survival rates up to 100%. Consequently, selection of the most appropriate management option is not primarily guided by survival considerations. The choice between the available options, each having its merits and its drawbacks, should be made based on a number of factors including treatment-related morbidity, views and expertise of the physician, patient preferences, the expected degree of patient compliance, and prognostic factor analysis. To date, the role of adjuvant chemotherapy as an alternative management option for patients with clinical Stage I NSTGCT at high risk of occult metastases is limited. This systemic treatment modality would be a realistic alternative if the reliability of prognostic factors to identify high-risk Stage I patients could be improved. This review addresses relevant issues in the management of patients with clinical Stage I NSTGCT to provide information that will allow a rational selection of the most appropriate management option.     

Management of clinical stage I testicular germ cell tumours

Testicular germ-cell cancer is the most frequent malignancy in young men. In 80% of case no metastasis is observed at diagnosis. Orchidectomy is the initial therapeutic intervention. In case of a pure seminoma, three treatment options should be discussed after surgery : radiotherapy with a limited dose and volume, surveillance, and chemotherapy by single-agent carboplatin. In non-seminomatous germ cell tumour three options should also be considered : surveillance, chemotherapy (two cycles of the BEP regimen) or retroperitoneal lymph node dissection. The strategy should be chosen taking into account predictive factors of relapse and the patient willing. Whatever the strategy, the cure rate is about 99%.     

Vaginal brachytherapy alone is sufficient adjuvant treatment of surgical stage I endometrial cancer

PURPOSE: To determine the efficacy and complications of adjuvant vaginal high-dose-rate brachytherapy alone for patients with Stage I endometrial cancer in whom complete surgical staging had been performed. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between April 1998 and March 2004, 100 patients with Stage I endometrial cancer underwent surgical staging (total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy with pelvic +/- paraaortic nodal sampling) and postoperative vaginal high-dose-rate brachytherapy at our institution. The total dose was 2100 cGy in three fractions. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 23 months (range 2-62), no pelvic or vaginal recurrences developed. All patients underwent pelvic dissection, and 42% underwent paraaortic nodal dissection. A median of 29.5 pelvic nodes (range 1-67) was removed (84% had >10 pelvic nodes removed). Most patients (73%) had endometrioid (or unspecified) adenocarcinoma, 16% had papillary serous carcinoma, and 11% had other histologic types. The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage and grade was Stage IA, grade III in 5; Stage IB, grade I, II, or III in 6, 27, or 20, respectively; and Stage IC, grade I, II, or III in 13, 17, or 10, respectively. The Common Toxicity Criteria (version 2.0) complications were mild (Grade 1-2) and consisted primarily of vaginal mucosal changes, temporary urinary irritation, and temporary diarrhea. CONCLUSION: Adjuvant vaginal high-dose-rate brachytherapy alone may be a safe and effective alternative to pelvic external beam radiotherapy for surgical Stage I endometrial cancer.     

Predictive value of pretreatment lymphocyte count in stage II colorectal cancer and in high-risk patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy

Pretreatment lymphocyte count (LC) has been associated with prognosis and chemotherapy response in several cancers. The predictive value of LC for stage II colorectal cancer (CRC) and for high-risk patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) has not been determined. A retrospective review of prospectively collected data from 1332 consecutive stage II CRC patients who underwent curative tumor resection was conducted. A pretreatment LC value <1.3 Giga/L(28.1%, 373/1332) was defined as low LC. A total of 738 patients (55.4%) were considered high-risk, 459 (62.2%) of whom received AC. Patients with low LCs had significantly worse 5-year OS (74.6% vs. 90.2%, p < 0.001) and DFS (61.3% vs. 84.6%, p < 0.001). High-risk patients with low LCs had the poorest DFS (p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis indicated that low LC value or combined with high-risk status were both independent prognostic factors(p <0.001). High-risk, AC-treated patients with high LCs had significantly longer DFS than untreated patients (HR, 0.594; 95% CI, 0.364–0.970; p = 0.035). There was no difference or trend for DFS or OS in patients with low LCs, regardless of the use of AC (DFS, p = 0.692; OS, p = 0.522). Low LC was also independently associated with poorer DFS in high-risk, AC-treated patients (HR, 1.885; 95% CI, 1.112–3.196; p = 0.019). CONCLUSIONS: Pretreatment LC is an independent prognostic factor for survival in stage II CRC. Furthermore, pretreatment LC reliably predicts chemotherapeutic efficacy in high-risk patients with stage II CRC.     

The pituitary-Leydig cell axis before and after orchiectomy in patients with stage I testicular cancer

Introduction

This study investigates the pituitary-Leydig cell axis in patients with stage I testicular germ cell cancer (TGCC) followed with surveillance only, in order to evaluate the risk of Leydig cell dysfunction one year after orchiectomy.

Patients and methods

A retrospective evaluation of reproductive hormones in patients with unilateral stage I TGCC (N = 72) without relapse diagnosed between 1990 and 2008. A group of healthy males (N = 706) served as controls.

Results

Before orchiectomy there were no significant differences in luteinizing hormone (LH) and testosterone (T) levels between human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG)-negative patients and controls, although 33% of the patients were outside the 97.5 percentile when using bivariate LH/T evaluation. At 1-year follow-up there was a significant increase in LH (ΔLH = 2.04 IU/L, p < 0.001), and 57% of the patients had an LH/T relation outside the 97.5 percentile.

Conclusion

Patients with stage I TGCC are at increased risk of having an LH/T relation outside the normal range one year after orchiectomy, suggesting insufficient Leydig-cell function. Whether a proportion of these patients will develop manifest hypogonadism and benefit from androgen therapy is yet to be clarified.     

Failure of adjuvant chemotherapy in testicular cancer

Two cases of failure of adjuvant chemotherapy after retroperitoneal lymph node dissection of Stage II nonseminomatous germ cell tumors are described. In both cases, initial surgical resection was complete, and two cycles of chemotherapy with cisplatin, vinblastine, and bleomycin were administered in an appropriate dose and schedule. Although one patient remains without evidence of disease 12 months after initiation of salvage chemotherapy with cisplatin, etoposide, and bleomycin, the other patient died of progressive disease despite intensive treatment with cisplatin and etoposide. Adjuvant therapy for Stage II germ cell tumors is not conventional treatment, and should be applied only in investigative settings where the long term effects and toxicity can be monitored, and does not reduce the need for frequent and thorough follow-up of treated patients.     

Late toxicity following curative treatment of testicular cancer

Cisplatin appears to be the major cause for long-term toxicity in patients treated for testicular cancer. Long-term side effects consist mainly of nephrotoxicity, ototoxicity, and neurotoxicity as well as gonadal damage. Following standard-dose chemotherapy approximately 20% to 30% of patients will be affected by long-term side effects, although not all these side effects will cause an impaired quality of life. Several strategies have been or currently are being evaluated to reduce acute and long-term complications including the introduction of equally effective, but less toxic regimens, or the use of cytoprotective agents such as amifostine. Secondary acute myeloid leukemia and secondary myelodysplastic syndrome probably represent the worst possible long-term complications of cancer therapy in those patients who originally were cured of their primary testicular cancer. Therapy-related solid tumors are mainly associated with the use of radiation therapy and the risk for developing a therapy-related solid tumor is increased approximately two to three times compared to the general population. In contrast, therapy-related leukemias are predominantly associated with chemotherapy, particularly with the use of topoisomerase-II inhibitors and alkylating agents. In general, the cumulative incidence of therapy-related leukemia following treatment of germ cell cancer is low. It is approximately 0.5% and 2% at 5 years of median follow-up for patients receiving etoposide at cumulative doses< or = 2 g/m(2) and >2 g/m(2), respectively. The risk-benefit analysis in patients with testicular cancer clearly favors the use of current treatment regimens including high-dose chemotherapy. However, even the acceptably low number of therapy-related long-term complications should encourage the search for equally effective but less toxic therapies. This review will highlight important available data about therapy-related toxicity and particularly, therapy-related malignancies following cisplatin-etoposide-based chemotherapy.     

Radiotherapy for testicular seminoma stage I: treatment results and long-term post-irradiation morbidity in 365 patients

After infradiaphragmatic radiotherapy the cancer-related 10 year survival was 99% in 365 patients with seminoma Stage I referred to the Norwegian Radium Hospital between 1970 and 1982. Thirteen patients relapsed, 11 of them within the first 3 years after treatment. Nine of the recurrent patients were cured by radiotherapy alone (4) or in combination with chemotherapy (5). There is no need to include the inguinal lymph nodes into the irradiation field or to give scrotal irradiation, not even to patients with tumor infiltration beyond the testicular tissue, or to those with prior scrotal or inguinal surgery. At least 1 year after radiotherapy moderate or more severe dyspepsia was observed in 16 patients. Nine patients developed a peptic ulcer. In general, there was no increased risk for development of a second non-germ cell cancer after radiotherapy. However, 4 patients developed a pulmonary cancer indicating a border-line significance of increased risk for this type of malignancy. (p:0.05). In conclusion, infradiaphragmatic radiotherapy remains the optimal routine treatment in seminoma patients with Stage I.     

Association between immunity and prognostic factors in early stage breast cancer patients before adjuvant treatment

Objective: The association of known prognostic factors with immune cell counts and ₂-microglobulin and soluble IL-2 receptor (sIL-2r) serum levels as markers of activation of the immune system was investigated in breastcancer. Methods: Two hundred thirty five operated stage I and II breast cancer patients to receive adjuvant treatment in IBSCG trials were assessed in a cross-sectional study immediately before the first treatment. Leukocytes, lymphocytes and lymphocyte subset counts, ₂-microglobulin and sIL-2r serum levels were assessed as immunological parameters. Prognostic factors were tumor load, receptor status, patient characteristics, and contextual factors of the immune assessment (such as time of the day, time since surgery, type of surgery, concomitant medication, co-morbidity). Results: In an operated early stage breast cancer patient population, tumor load was not associated with immune cell counts, ₂-microglobulin, or sIL-2r before adjuvant treatment. There was a pattern of association of prognostically favorable factors such as estrogen receptor (ER) positive tumor and older age with higher NK cell counts or with ₂-microglobulin or sIL-2r. In addition, immune cell counts and the markers of activation of the immune system were affected by several contextual factors, such as diurnal variability, time since surgery, type of surgery, and the intake of concomitant medication. Conclusions: The association of NK cell counts and ₂-microglobulin or sIL-2r serum levels with prognostically favorable factors such as ER positive tumor and older age supports the assumption that the immune system plays a role in the course of early breast cancer. The exact nature of this role requires furtherstudy.