Pembrolizumab monotherapy for previously treated metastatic triple-negative breast cancer: cohort A of the phase II KEYNOTE-086 study

BackgroundTreatment options for previously treated metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC) are limited. In cohort A of the phase II KEYNOTE-086 study, we evaluated pembrolizumab as second or later line of treatment for patients with mTNBC.Patients and methodsEligible patients had centrally confirmed mTNBC, ≥1 systemic therapy for metastatic disease, prior treatment with anthracycline and taxane in any disease setting, and progression on or after the most recent therapy. Patients received pembrolizumab 200 mg intravenously every 3 weeks for up to 2 years. Primary end points were objective response rate in the total and PD-L1–positive populations, and safety. Secondary end points included duration of response, disease control rate (percentage of patients with complete or partial response or stable disease for ≥24 weeks), progression-free survival, and overall survival.ResultsAll enrolled patients (N = 170) were women, 61.8% had PD-L1–positive tumors, and 43.5% had received ≥3 previous lines of therapy for metastatic disease. ORR (95% CI) was 5.3% (2.7–9.9) in the total and 5.7% (2.4–12.2) in the PD-L1–positive populations. Disease control rate (95% CI) was 7.6% (4.4–12.7) and 9.5% (5.1–16.8), respectively. Median duration of response was not reached in the total (range, 1.2+–21.5+) and in the PD-L1–positive (range, 6.3–21.5+) populations. Median PFS was 2.0 months (95% CI, 1.9–2.0), and the 6-month rate was 14.9%. Median OS was 9.0 months (95% CI, 7.6–11.2), and the 6-month rate was 69.1%. Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 103 (60.6%) patients, including 22 (12.9%) with grade 3 or 4 AEs. There were no deaths due to AEs.ConclusionsPembrolizumab monotherapy demonstrated durable antitumor activity in a subset of patients with previously treated mTNBC and had a manageable safety profile.Clinical trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02447003     

Outcomes to first-line pembrolizumab in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer and very high PD-L1 expression

BackgroundIn non-small-cell lung cancers with programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression on ≥50% of tumor cells, first-line treatment with the PD-1 inhibitor pembrolizumab improves survival compared with platinum-doublet chemotherapy. Whether higher PD-L1 levels within the expression range of 50%–100% predict for even greater benefit to pembrolizumab is currently unknown.Patients and methodsIn this multicenter retrospective analysis, we analyzed the impact of PD-L1 expression levels on the overall response rate (ORR), median progression-free survival (mPFS), and median overall survival (mOS) in patients who received commercial pembrolizumab as first-line treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with a PD-L1 expression of ≥50% and negative for genomic alterations in the EGFR and ALK genes.ResultsAmong 187 patients included in this analysis, the ORR was 44.4% [95% confidence interval (CI) 37.1% to 51.8%], the mPFS was 6.5 months (95% CI 4.5–8.5), and the mOS was not reached. The median PD-L1 expression level among patients who experienced a response to pembrolizumab was significantly higher than among patients with stable or progressive disease (90% versus 75%, P < 0.001). Compared with patients with PD-L1 expression of 50%–89% (N = 107), patients with an expression level of 90%–100% (N = 80) had a significantly higher ORR (60.0% versus 32.7%, P < 0.001), a significantly longer mPFS [14.5 versus 4.1 months, hazard ratio (HR) 0.50 (95% CI 0.33–0.74), P < 0.01], and a significantly longer mOS [not reached versus 15.9 months, HR 0.39 (95% CI 0.21–0.70), P = 0.002].ConclusionAmong patients with NSCLC and PD-L1 expression of ≥50% treated with first-line pembrolizumab, clinical outcomes are significantly improved in NSCLCs with a PD-L1 expression of ≥90%. These findings have implications for treatment selection as well as for clinical trial interpretation and design.     

Pembrolizumab as first-line therapy for patients with PD-L1-positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a phase 1 trial

BackgroundPembrolizumab improved survival as first- and second-line therapy compared with chemotherapy in patients with highly programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expressing advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We report the long-term safety and clinical activity of pembrolizumab as first-line therapy for patients with advanced NSCLC and the correlation between PD-L1 expression and efficacy.Patients and methodsIn the open-label phase 1b KEYNOTE-001 trial, treatment-naive patients with advanced NSCLC whose tumors expressed PD-L1 (≥1% staining, assessed using a prototype assay) were randomly assigned to intravenous pembrolizumab 2 or 10 mg/kg every 3 (Q3W) or 2 (Q2W) weeks. Response was assessed per central RECIST v1.1 every 9 weeks in all patients who received ≥1 pembrolizumab dose. Using pre-treatment tumor tissue, a clinical assay quantified the percentage of tumor cells expressing PD-L1 as tumor proportion score (TPS).ResultsBetween 1 March 2013 and 18 September 2015, 101 patients received pembrolizumab 2 mg/kg Q3W (n = 6), 10 mg/kg Q3W (n = 49), or 10 mg/kg Q2W (n = 46). Of these, 27 (26.7%) had TPS ≥50%, 52 (51.5%) had TPS 1%–49%, and 12 (11.9%) had TPS <1%. The objective response rate (ORR) was 27% (27/101, 95% CI 18–37) and median overall survival was 22.1 months (95% CI 17.1–27.2). In patients with PD-L1 TPS ≥50%, ORR, 12-month PFS, and 12-month OS were higher [14/27 (51.9%; 95% CI 32%–71%), 54%, and 85%, respectively] than the overall population [27/101 (26.7%; 95% CI 18.4%–36.5%), 35%, 71%]. Pembrolizumab was well tolerated, with only 12 (11.9%) patients experiencing grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events and no treatment-related deaths.ConclusionsPembrolizumab provides promising long-term OS benefit with a manageable safety profile for PD-L1-expressing treatment-naive advanced NSCLC, with greatest efficacy observed in patients with TPS ≥50%.Clinical trial name and numberKEYNOTE-001 (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01295827).     

KEYNOTE-033: Randomized phase 3 study of pembrolizumab vs docetaxel in previously treated,PD-L1-positive,advanced NSCLC

KEYNOTE-033 (NCT02864394) was a multicountry, open-label, phase 3 study that compared pembrolizumab vs docetaxel in previously treated, programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1)-positive, advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), with most patients enrolled in mainland China. Eligible patients were randomized (1:1) to pembrolizumab 2 mg/kg or docetaxel 75 mg/m² every 3 weeks. Primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival and were evaluated sequentially using stratified log-rank tests, first in patients with PD-L1 tumor proportion score (TPS) ≥50% and then in patients with PD-L1 TPS ≥1% (significance threshold: P < .025, one-sided). A total of 425 patients were randomized to pembrolizumab (N = 213) or docetaxel (N = 212) between 8 September 2016 and 17 October 2018. In patients with a PD-L1 TPS ≥50% (n = 227), median OS was 12.3 months with pembrolizumab and 10.9 months with docetaxel; the hazard ratio (HR) was 0.83 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.61-1.14; P = .1276). Because the significance threshold was not met, sequential testing of OS and PFS was ceased. In patients with a PD-L1 TPS ≥1%, the HR for OS for pembrolizumab vs docetaxel was 0.75 (95% CI: 0.60-0.95). In patients from mainland China (n = 311) with a PD-L1 TPS ≥1%, HR for OS was 0.68 (95% CI: 0.51-0.89). Incidence of grade 3 to 5 treatment-related AEs was 11.3% with pembrolizumab vs 47.5% with docetaxel. In summary, pembrolizumab improved OS vs docetaxel in previously treated, PD-L1-positive NSCLC without unexpected safety signals; although the statistical significance threshold was not reached, the numerical improvement is consistent with that previously observed for pembrolizumab in previously treated, advanced NSCLC.     

First-line pembrolizumab ± chemotherapy for recurrent/metastatic head and neck cancer: Japanese subgroup of KEYNOTE-048

Background

Here, we report the results of the Japanese subgroup of the phase 3 KEYNOTE-048 study of pembrolizumab alone, pembrolizumab plus platinum and 5-fluorouracil (pembrolizumab–chemotherapy), or cetuximab plus platinum and 5-fluorouracil (EXTREME) in previously untreated recurrent/metastatic (R/M) head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC).

Methods

Primary end points were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Efficacy was evaluated in patients with PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) ≥ 20 and ≥ 1 and the total Japanese subgroup (n = 67).

Results

At data cutoff (25 February 2019), pembrolizumab led to longer OS versus EXTREME in the PD-L1 CPS ≥ 20 subgroup (median, 28.2 vs. 13.3 months; HR, 0.29 [95% CI 0.09–0.89]) and to similar OS in the total Japanese (23.4 vs. 13.6 months; HR, 0.51 [95% CI 0.25–1.05]) and CPS ≥ 1 subgroups (22.6 vs. 15.8 months; HR, 0.66 [95% CI 0.31–1.41]). Pembrolizumab–chemotherapy led to similar OS versus EXTREME in the PD-L1 CPS ≥ 20 (median, 18.1 vs. 15.8 months; HR, 0.72 [95% CI 0.23–2.19]), CPS ≥ 1 (12.6 vs. 15.8 months; HR, 1.19 [95% CI 0.55–2.58]), and total Japanese subgroups (12.6 vs. 13.3 months; unadjusted HR, 1.10 [95% CI 0.55–2.22]). Median PFS was similar for pembrolizumab and pembrolizumab–chemotherapy versus EXTREME in all subgroups. Grades 3–5 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 5 (22%), 19 (76%), and 17 (89%) patients receiving pembrolizumab, pembrolizumab–chemotherapy, and EXTREME, respectively. One patient receiving pembrolizumab–chemotherapy died because of treatment-related pneumonitis.

Conclusion

These results support the use of first-line pembrolizumab and pembrolizumab–chemotherapy for Japanese patients with R/M HNSCC.

Clinical trial registry ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02358031.

     

Association Between Survival and Very High Versus High PD-L1 Expression in Patients Receiving Pembrolizumab as First-line Treatment for Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

BackgroundA prior study found that, among advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) patients with PD-L1 expression 50% to 100% receiving immunotherapy as monotherapy, PD-L1 expression ≥ 90% was associated with longer survival. We sought to replicate this finding using real-world data from community oncology practices across the US.MethodsRetrospective cohort study of aNSCLC patients who initiated pembrolizumab monotherapy for first line and had a PD-L1 expression ≥ 50% using a nationwide, deidentified longitudinal electronic health record–derived real-world database. The exposure of interest was very high PD-L1 expression, which was defined as ≥ 90%, compared to high PD-L1 expression, defined as 50% to 89%. The primary outcome was overall survival, measured from initiation of pembrolizumab to date of death, with censoring at last healthcare encounter. Multiple imputation was used to impute missing covariates. Propensity score-based inverse probability weighting (IPW) was used to address confounding in Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazard regression models.ResultsThe cohort included 1952 aNSCLC patients receiving first-line pembrolizumab monotherapy. Half of cohort members were female, median age was 73 years (interquartile range, 65-80), 71% had non-squamous histology, 94% had a history of smoking, and 46% had very high PD-L1 expression. Median overall survival in the propensity score-weighted sample was 15.84 months for very high PD-L1 expression and 12.72 months for high PD-L1 expression. Having a very high PD-L1 expression was associated with lower hazard of mortality (IPW hazard ratio 0.79, 95% CI 0.69-0.91).ConclusionsIn this large national US cohort, patients with very high PD-L1 expression (≥ 90%) aNSCLC receiving first-line pembrolizumab experienced better median survival than those with high PD-L1 expression (50% to 89%).     

Efficacy and Safety of First-Line Immunotherapy Combinations for Advanced NSCLC: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

IntroductionA series of randomized controlled trials have investigated different first-line immunotherapy combinations, but the optimal combination strategy is yet to be established.MethodsWe performed a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis by retrieving relevant literature from PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, and major international conferences. We included published and gray sources of randomized clinical trials comparing immunotherapy combinations with other treatments as first-line treatments for patients with advanced NSCLC. This study was registered in the Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42020210501) to ensure transparency.ResultsWe analyzed a total of 16 studies involving 8278 patients and including 10 immunotherapy combinations. For patients without programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) selection, pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy was found to be comparable with sintilimab plus chemotherapy in providing the best overall survival (OS) benefit (hazard ratio = 0.96, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.72–1.29). Furthermore, atezolizumab plus bevacizumab plus chemotherapy seemed to provide the best progression-free survival (hazard ratio = 0.45, 95% CI: 0.36–0.55) and the best objective response rate (OR = 0.23, 95% CI: 0.12–0.42). Subgroup analysis by PD-L1 suggested that nivolumab plus ipilimumab plus chemotherapy was associated with the best OS in patients with PD-L1 less than 1% and that pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy was associated with the best OS in patients with PD-L1 greater than or equal to 1%. Pembrolizumab and sintilimab were associated with relatively fewer grade greater than or equal to 3 adverse events when compared with other immunotherapies combined with chemotherapy.ConclusionsOur results suggest that antiprogrammed death-1 combinations are associated with potentially higher survival outcomes than anti–PD-L1 combinations with comparable safety profiles. Moreover, pem-chemo and nivo-ipi-chemo seem to be superior first-line immunotherapy combinations for patients with advanced NSCLC with positive and negative PD-L1 expression, respectively. Although atezo-beva-chemo treatment provided the best progression-free survival and objective response rate, the addition of chemotherapy to immunotherapy would increase the toxicity, especially when antiangiogenesis drugs are simultaneously added.     

Randomized Phase 2 Studies of Checkpoint Inhibitors Alone or in Combination With Pegilodecakin in Patients With Metastatic NSCLC (CYPRESS 1 and CYPRESS 2)

IntroductionCheckpoint inhibitors (CPIs) have been approved to treat metastatic NSCLC. Pegilodecakin + CPI suggested promising efficacy in phase 1 IVY, providing rationale for randomized phase 2 trials CYPRESS 1 and CYPRESS 2.MethodsCYPRESS 1 (N = 101) and CYPRESS 2 (N = 52) included Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 to 1 and first-line/second-line metastatic NSCLC, respectively, without known EGFR/ALK mutations. Patients were randomized 1:1; control arms received pembrolizumab (CYPRESS 1) or nivolumab (CYPRESS 2); experimental arms received pegilodecakin + CPI. Patients had programmed death-ligand 1 tumor proportion score of greater than or equal to 50% (CYPRESS 1) or 0% to 49% (CYPRESS 2). Primary end point was objective response rate (ORR) per investigator. Secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Exploratory end points included immune activation biomarkers.ResultsMedian follow-up for CYPRESS 1 and CYPRESS 2 was 10.0 and 11.6 months, respectively. Results for pegilodecakin + pembrolizumab versus pembrolizumab were as follows: ORR per investigator 47% versus 44% (OR = 1.1, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.5–2.5); median PFS 6.3 versus 6.1 months (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.937, 95% CI: 0.54–1.625); and median OS 16.3 months versus not reached (HR = 1.507, 95% CI: 0.708–3.209). Results per blinded independent central review were consistent. Treatment discontinuation rate owing to adverse events (AEs) doubled in the experimental arm (32% versus 15%). AEs with grade greater than or equal to 3 treatment-related AEs (62% versus 19%) included anemia (20% versus 0%) and thrombocytopenia (12% versus 2%). Results for pegilodecakin + nivolumab versus nivolumab were as follows: ORR per investigator 15% versus 12% (OR = 1.2, 95% CI: 0.3–5.9); median PFS 1.9 versus 1.9 months (HR = 1.006, 95% CI: 0.519–1.951); and median OS 6.7 versus 10.7 months (HR = 1.871, 95% CI: 0.772–4.532). AEs with grade greater than or equal to 3 treatment-related AEs (70.4% versus 16.7%) included anemia (40.7% versus 0%), fatigue (18% versus 0%), and thrombocytopenia (14.8% versus 0%). Biomarker data suggested activation of immunostimulatory signals of interleukin-10R pathway in pegilodecakin-containing arms.ConclusionsDespite evidence of biological effect in peripheral blood, adding pegilodecakin to CPI did not improve ORR, PFS, or OS, in first-line/second-line NSCLC. Pegilodecakin + CPI has been found to have overall higher toxicity compared with CPI alone, leading to doubling of treatment discontinuation rate owing to AEs.     

Real-World Efficacy of First-Line Pembrolizumab in Patients With Advanced or Recurrent Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer and High PD-L1 Tumor Expression

BackgroundIn clinical trials, first-line treatment with pembrolizumab improved overall survival (OS) in patients with advanced non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with a programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) tumor proportion score of ≥ 50%. However, data on the efficacy of this treatment between clinical trials and actual clinical practice are inconsistent.Patients and MethodsNinety-five patients with histologically diagnosed advanced or recurrent NSCLC and a PD-L1 tumor proportion score of ≥ 50% who received pembrolizumab as first-line treatment were consecutively enrolled onto this multicenter retrospective study from February 2017 to December 2018. Clinical data were collected from electronic medical records. We assessed the objective response rate, progression-free survival (PFS), OS, and immune-related adverse events (irAE), and determined their associations with clinical characteristics.ResultsThe objective response rate was 40.0%. The median PFS was 6.1 months, and OS did not reach the median. Multivariate analyses revealed that nonadenocarcinoma histology (hazard ratio, 1.78; 95% confidence interval, 1.05-3.03; P = .015) and ≥ 3 metastatic sites (hazard ratio, 3.97; 95% confidence interval, 1.97-8.01; P < .001) were independently correlated with poor PFS. Patients with irAE and patients without interstitial lung disease had significantly longer PFS (14.0 and 4.9 months, respectively; P = .011) than patients without irAE or patients with interstitial lung disease.ConclusionThe outcome of patients receiving first-line pembrolizumab treatment was worse in those with nonadenocarcinoma and with a large number of metastatic sites. Patients with irAE and without interstitial lung disease had a more favorable outcome.     

First-line Pembrolizumab Versus Pembrolizumab Plus Chemotherapy Versus Chemotherapy Alone in Non–small-cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis

BackgroundThis study aimed to comprehensively review the available evidence regarding the efficacy of first-line pembrolizumab for advanced/metastatic non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and to compare pembrolizumab monotherapy versus pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone.Materials and MethodsA search of the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases was performed in July 2018, and abstracts from the American Society of Clinical Oncology meetings (2015-2018) were reviewed. Summaries of the results were pooled using a random-effect model to determine the pooled hazard ratio (HR) for progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs). A network meta-analysis was used to indirectly compare pembrolizumab monotherapy with pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy.ResultsA total of 4 relevant phase III trials comprising 2754 patients were identified. Pembrolizumab (with or without chemotherapy) led to significant improvements in OS and PFS, irrespective of the programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) tumor proportion score (TPS). In particular, for the subgroup with PD-L1 TPS ≥ 50%, the HR of PFS was 0.49 (95% CI, 0.32-0.76; P = .001), and that of OS was 0.57 (95% CI, 0.45-0.73; P < .001). In terms of PFS, pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy was superior to pembrolizumab monotherapy with an HR of PFS 0.52 (95% CI, 0.27-0.99; P = .048) for the subgroup with PD-L1 TPS ≥ 50%.ConclusionsFor patients with NSCLC with PD-L1 TPS ≥ 50%, pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy has a better PFS than pembrolizumab monotherapy in this meta-analysis. To confirm this finding, a prospective phase III trial that directly compares the treatments is warranted.     

Cost-effectiveness of Pembrolizumab versus Carboplatin-based Chemotherapy as First-line Treatment of PD-L1–positive Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma Ineligible for Cisplatin-based Therapy in the United States

IntroductionPembrolizumab has been approved in the United States (US) for the first-line treatment of patients with advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma, who are ineligible for cisplatin-containing chemotherapy and with tumors expressing programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) (Combined Positive Score ≥ 10), or ineligible for any platinum-containing chemotherapy regardless of PD-L1 status. Long-term KEYNOTE-052 data continue to demonstrate pembrolizumab’s meaningful, durable, and well-tolerated antitumor activity. This study evaluates the cost-effectiveness of pembrolizumab versus carboplatin plus gemcitabine as first-line treatment for cisplatin-ineligible patients who have PD-L1–positive tumors from a US third-party healthcare payer’s perspective.Patients and MethodsA partitioned survival model containing 3 health states (progression-free, progressed, and death) was developed. A simulated treatment comparison and a network meta-analysis were conducted to estimate the comparative efficacy of pembrolizumab versus carboplatin-based chemotherapy. Overall survival, progression-free survival, time on treatment, adverse events, and utilities were modeled using the final analyses of the KEYNOTE-052 trial and 4 studies for carboplatin plus gemcitabine. Cost data were estimated using US standard sources and real-world data. Deterministic, probabilistic, and scenario analyses were conducted to assess the robustness of the results.ResultsOver 20 years, pembrolizumab resulted in a mean gain of 2.58 life-years, 2.01 quality-adjusted life-years, and additional costs of $158,561, leading to an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $78,925/quality-adjusted life-year compared with carboplatin plus gemcitabine.ConclusionThis study suggests that pembrolizumab is cost-effective compared with carboplatin plus gemcitabine as a first-line therapy for patients with advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma who are PD-L1–positive.     

Five-year survival outcomes for patients with advanced melanoma treated with pembrolizumab in KEYNOTE-001

BackgroundPembrolizumab demonstrated robust antitumor activity and safety in the phase Ib KEYNOTE-001 study (NCT01295827) of advanced melanoma. Five-year outcomes in all patients and treatment-naive patients are reported herein. Patients whose disease progressed following initial response and who received a second course of pembrolizumab were also analyzed.Patients and methodsPatients aged ≥18 years with previously treated or treatment-naive advanced/metastatic melanoma received pembrolizumab 2 mg/kg every 3 weeks, 10 mg/kg every 3 weeks, or 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, or patient/investigator decision to withdraw. Kaplan–Meier estimates of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were calculated. Objective response rate and PFS were based on immune-related response criteria by investigator assessment (data cut-off, September 1, 2017).ResultsKEYNOTE-001 enrolled 655 patients with melanoma; median follow-up was 55 months. Estimated 5-year OS was 34% in all patients and 41% in treatment-naive patients; median OS was 23.8 months (95% CI, 20.2–30.4) and 38.6 months (95% CI, 27.2–not reached), respectively. Estimated 5-year PFS rates were 21% in all patients and 29% in treatment-naive patients; median PFS was 8.3 months (95% CI, 5.8–11.1) and 16.9 months (95% CI, 9.3–35.5), respectively. Median response duration was not reached; 73% of all responses and 82% of treatment-naive responses were ongoing at data cut-off; the longest response was ongoing at 66 months. Four patients [all with prior response of complete response (CR)] whose disease progressed during observation subsequently received second-course pembrolizumab. One patient each achieved CR and partial response (after data cut-off). Treatment-related AEs (TRAEs) occurred in 86% of patients and resulted in study discontinuation in 7.8%; 17% experienced grade 3/4 TRAE.ConclusionsThis 5-year analysis of KEYNOTE-001 represents the longest follow-up for pembrolizumab to date and confirms the durable antitumor activity and tolerability of pembrolizumab in advanced melanoma.Clinical Trial RegistryClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01295827.     

Clinical Outcomes of Platinum-ineligible Patients with Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma Treated With First-line PD1/L1 Inhibitors

BackgroundPD1/L1 inhibitors are approved by FDA as first-line therapy for patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma (aUC) who are cisplatin-ineligible with high tumor PD-L1 expression or are platinum-ineligible regardless of PD-L1 expression. However, the outcomes when employing PD1/L1 inhibitors for platinum-ineligible patients are unclear. This retrospective analysis evaluates the clinical outcomes of first-line PD1/L1 inhibitors in patients with aUC deemed to be platinum-ineligible.MethodsData were retrospectively collected from 8 academic institutions. The following criteria were used to define platinum ineligibility: creatinine clearance (CrCl) < 30 mL/min; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) 3; CrCl 30 to 59 mL/min and ECOG PS 2; elderly and/or comorbidities. Patient characteristics, responses and treatment-related toxicities were identified. Survival curves were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. A Cox regression analysis was conducted to explore the association of baseline variables with response and survival.ResultsA total of 79 platinum-ineligible patients with aUC were eligible. Patients were treated with atezolizumab (51.9%), pembrolizumab (35.5%), nivolumab (8.9%), or durvalumab (3.8%). The objective response rate was 27.9%. The median overall survival was 45 weeks (95% confidence interval [CI], 32-80), and the median treatment failure-free survival was 16 weeks (95% CI, 9-18). Treatment-related toxicity of any grade and grade ≥ 3 was seen in 41.8% and 31.7% of patients, respectively. Anemia and liver metastasis were associated with worse survival.ConclusionThe efficacy of first-line PD1/L1 inhibitors for platinum-ineligible patients with aUC in the real world appears comparable to those reported in trials of unselected cisplatin-ineligible patients, whereas grade ≥ 3 toxicities appear more common. Further validation is required including data based on PD-L1 status and other biomarkers. Platinum-ineligible patients with aUC warrant evaluation of novel, safe, and effective agents.     

A Randomized Phase III Study of Pembrolizumab Versus Pembrolizumab-Carboplatin-Pemetrexed for Locally Advanced or Metastatic Nonsquamous Non-small-cell Lung Cancer with PD-L1 50% or more (LAPLACE-50): Study Protocol

BackgroundPembrolizumab monotherapy or immune checkpoint inhibitor with platinum and pemetrexed combination chemotherapy are the standard therapies for patients with nonsquamous non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) tumor proportion score (TPS) ≥ 50%. However, there are no data on the comparative effectiveness of the 2 regimens in patients with nonsquamous NSCLC with PD-L1 TPS ≥ 50%.Patients and MethodsThis randomized, multicenter, phase III trial (LAPLACE-50, jRCTs031200078) was designed to compare the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab with pembrolizumab-carboplatin-pemetrexed combination in patients with nonsquamous NSCLC with PD-L1 TPS ≥ 50%. Patients are eligible for enrollment if they are at least 20 years old; have pathologically confirmed locally advanced/metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC without sensitizing epidermal growth factor receptor or anaplastic lymphoma kinase mutations; have not received previous systemic therapy for metastatic disease; have an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1; and have at least 1 measurable lesion. Patients will be excluded if they have symptomatic central nervous system metastases, interstitial pneumonitis, active autoimmune disease, or are on systemic immunosuppressive treatment. The patients will be randomized 1:1 to pembrolizumab (200 mg) or pembrolizumab (200 mg) plus carboplatin (area under the curve 5) plus pemetrexed (500 mg/m²) on day 1 of each 21-day treatment cycle. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival. The recruitment phase began in August 2020 and will enroll 290 patients.ConclusionIf the primary endpoint is achieved, pembrolizumab could be the first choice for first-line treatment in patients with nonsquamous NSCLC with PD-L1 TPS ≥ 50%.     

Efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab for older patients with chemoresistant urothelial carcinoma assessed using propensity score matching

BackgroundWe used real-world and large-scale data to assess the clinical efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab in older patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC).MethodsA total of 608 patients who received pembrolizumab for the treatment of chemoresistant UC were retrospectively analyzed. All patients were histologically diagnosed with pure UC. Using propensity score matching (PSM) (ECOG performance status, site of metastasis, hemoglobin level and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, 1:1 matching), the overall survival (OS) and adverse events (AEs) of patients <75 and ≥75 years old were compared.ResultsThe median follow-up (IQR) period was 16.1 (9.9–20.5) months. After PSM, there were 215 patients each in the aged <75 years and aged ≥75-year-old groups. The median OS of all patients was estimated to be 10.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI] = 8.8–12.1). After PSM, the median OS was 7.8 months (95% CI = 5.2–10.4) in the <75-year-old group and 10.4 months (95% CI = 7.3–13.5) in the ≥75-year-old group (P = 0.186). Any-grade AEs were more frequently reported in the ≥75-year-old group in comparison to the age <75-year-old group (55.3% vs. 41.9%, P = 0.007), whereas there was no significant difference between the two groups in the incidence of grade ≥3 AEs (10.2% vs. 12.6%, P = 0.544). The objective response rate, defined as complete remission or a partial response, was 22.8% in the <75-year-old group and 25.1% in the ≥75-year-old group (P = 0.651).ConclusionsThe present study demonstrates that age does not affect the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab treatment for advanced chemoresistant UC. Pembrolizumab treatment should not be avoided based on chronological age; however, close monitoring for the development of treatment-related AE should be considered for older patients.     

Use of archival versus newly collected tumor samples for assessing PD-L1 expression and overall survival: an updated analysis of KEYNOTE-010 trial

BackgroundIn KEYNOTE-010, pembrolizumab versus docetaxel improved overall survival (OS) in patients with programmed death-1 protein (PD)-L1-positive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). A prespecified exploratory analysis compared outcomes in patients based on PD-L1 expression in archival versus newly collected tumor samples using recently updated survival data.Patients and methodsPD-L1 was assessed centrally by immunohistochemistry (22C3 antibody) in archival or newly collected tumor samples. Patients received pembrolizumab 2 or 10 mg/kg Q3W or docetaxel 75 mg/m² Q3W for 24 months or until progression/intolerable toxicity/other reason. Response was assessed by RECIST v1.1 every 9 weeks, survival every 2 months. Primary end points were OS and progression-free survival (PFS) in tumor proportion score (TPS) ≥50% and ≥1%; pembrolizumab doses were pooled in this analysis.ResultsAt date cut-off of 24 March 2017, median follow-up was 31 months (range 23–41) representing 18 additional months of follow-up from the primary analysis. Pembrolizumab versus docetaxel continued to improve OS in patients with previously treated, PD-L1-expressing advanced NSCLC; hazard ratio (HR) was 0.66 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.57, 0.77]. Of 1033 patients analyzed, 455(44%) were enrolled based on archival samples and 578 (56%) on newly collected tumor samples. Approximately 40% of archival samples and 45% of newly collected tumor samples were PD-L1 TPS ≥50%. For TPS ≥50%, the OS HRs were 0.64 (95% CI: 0.45, 0.91) and 0.40 (95% CI: 0.28, 0.56) for archival and newly collected samples, respectively. In patients with TPS ≥1%, OS HRs were 0.74 (95% CI: 0.59, 0.93) and 0.59 (95% CI: 0.48, 0.73) for archival and newly collected samples, respectively. In TPS ≥50%, PFS HRs were similar across archival [0.63 (95% CI: 0.45, 0.89)] and newly collected samples [0.53 (95% CI: 0.38, 0.72)]. In patients with TPS ≥1%, PFS HRs were similar across archival [0.82 (95% CI: 0.66, 1.02)] and newly collected samples [0.83 (95% CI: 0.68, 1.02)].ConclusionPembrolizumab continued to improve OS over docetaxel in intention to treat population and in subsets of patients with newly collected and archival samples.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01905657.     

Real-world Experience of Cabozantinib as Second- or Subsequent Line Treatment in Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: Data From the Polish Managed Access Program

BackgroundCabozantinib is an approved treatment for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). This report presents an analysis of the safety profile and efficacy of cabozantinib in an unselected population from Poland.Patients and MethodsPatients with mRCC, who had been treated with at least 1 previous agent targeting the vascular endothelial growth factor pathway, were eligible to receive cabozantinib at a once-daily dose of 60 mg orally, according to the Managed Access Program (MAP). Data were collected in 4 Polish centers. Patients who had received ≥ 1 dose of cabozantinib were monitored for adverse events (AEs) using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v.4.0.ResultsA total of 115 patients were enrolled between October 2016 and March 2018, including 50% with bone metastases, 10% with brain metastases and 4.3% with non–clear-cell RCC; 76% had received ≥ 2 lines of therapy. The median time of follow-up was 12.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 11.5-14.1 months). The most common grade 3 and 4 AEs were fatigue (23%), hand-foot syndrome (12%), and diarrhea (10%). Only 4% of patients discontinued treatment owing to AEs, and there were no treatment-related deaths. Partial response was observed in 19% of patients, whereas 56% had stable disease. The median progression-free survival was 12.5 months (95% CI, 9.2-14.2 months), with a 12-month overall survival rate of 70.4% (95% CI, 60.2%-78.5%).ConclusionsCabozantinib demonstrated acceptable tolerability and activity in a large unselected population of patients with mRCC under clinical conditions.     

Phase 1 Expansion Cohort of Ramucirumab Plus Pembrolizumab in Advanced Treatment-Naive NSCLC

IntroductionData of first-line ramucirumab plus pembrolizumab treatment of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1)–positive NSCLC (cohort E) are reported (NCT02443324).MethodsIn this multicenter, open-label phase 1a/b trial, patients received ramucirumab 10 mg/kg and pembrolizumab 200 mg every 21 days for up to 35 cycles. PD-L1 positivity was defined as tumor proportion score (TPS) greater than or equal to 1%. Exploratory NanoString biomarker analyses included three T-cell signatures (T-cell–inflamed, Gajewski, and effector T cells) and CD274 gene expression.ResultsCohort E included 26 patients. Treatment-related adverse events of any grade occurred in 22 patients (84.6%). Treatment-related adverse events of grade greater than or equal to 3 were reported in 11 patients (42.3%); the most frequent was hypertension (n = 4, 15.4%). Objective response rate was 42.3% in the treated population and 56.3% and 22.2% for patients with high (TPS ≥ 50%) and lower levels (TPS 1%–49%) of PD-L1 expression, respectively. Median progression-free survival (PFS) in the treated population was 9.3 months, and 12-month and 18-month PFS rates were 45% each. Median PFS was not reached in patients with PD-L1 TPS greater than or equal to 50% and was 4.2 months in patients with PD-L1 TPS 1% to 49%. Median overall survival was not reached in the treated population, and 12-month and 18-month overall survival rates were 73% and 64%, respectively. Biomarker data suggested a positive association among clinical response, three T-cell signatures, CD274 gene expression, and PD-L1 immunohistochemistry.ConclusionsFirst-line therapy with ramucirumab plus pembrolizumab has a manageable safety profile in patients with NSCLC, and the efficacy signal seems to be strongest in tumors with high PD-L1 expression.     

Outcomes of patients with metastatic clear-cell renal cell carcinoma treated with pazopanib after disease progression with other targeted therapies

AimThe multi-tyrosine kinase inhibitor pazopanib prolongs progression-free survival (PFS) versus placebo in treatment-naive and cytokine-refractory metastatic clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). Outcomes and safety data with pazopanib after targeted therapy (TT) are limited.MethodsWe retrospectively evaluated records of consecutive patients with metastatic ccRCC who had progressive disease (PD) after TT and received pazopanib from November 2009 through November 2011. Tumour response was assessed by a blinded radiologist using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumours (RECIST). PFS and overall survival (OS) were estimated by Kaplan–Meier methods.ResultsNinety-three patients were identified. Median number of prior TTs was 2 (range, 1–5). There were 68 events (PD or death). Among 85 evaluable patients, 13 (15%) had a partial response. Median PFS was 6.5 months (95% CI: 4.5–9.7); median OS was 18.1 months (95% CI: 10.26–NA). Common adverse events (AEs) included fatigue (44%), elevated transaminases (35%), diarrhoea (30%), hypothyroidism (18%), nausea/vomiting (17%), anorexia (14%) and hypertension exacerbation (14%); 91% of AEs were grade 1/2. Eleven patients (12%) discontinued therapy due to AEs. There were no treatment-related deaths.Concluding statementPazopanib demonstrated efficacy in patients with metastatic ccRCC after PD with other TTs. Toxicity overall was mild/moderate and manageable.     

Real-world Clinical Outcomes of Pazopanib Immediately After Discontinuation of Immunotherapy for Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma

IntroductionIn the first-line (1L) setting, pazopanib (PAZ) has been recommended by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network for the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC). In 2018, immuno-oncology (IO) therapy became a commonly used 1L treatment option for aRCC. We report the real-world clinical outcomes of PAZ after IO therapy for patients with aRCC.Materials and MethodsWe performed a longitudinal, retrospective medical record review study. The included patients were aged ≥ 18 years, had initiated second-line and/or beyond PAZ after IO therapy for clear cell aRCC on or before October 2017, and had complete medical records available from the diagnosis of aRCC to the discontinuation of PAZ, death, or the medical record extraction date (May 2018), whichever occurred first. The primary outcome variable was the PAZ duration of therapy. The secondary outcomes were progression-free survival and overall survival since PAZ initiation, the reasons for PAZ discontinuation, and the occurrence of adverse events (AEs).ResultsA total of 258 eligible patients had initiated IO therapies before PAZ as follows: nivolumab (68%), nivolumab plus ipilimumab (14%), pembrolizumab (12%), and ipilimumab (3%). Overall, the median PAZ duration of therapy was 13.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 10.1-16.0 months). The median progression-free survival with PAZ after IO therapy was 13.5 months (95% CI, 11.8 months to not reached). The estimated overall survival rate of PAZ after IO therapy at 6 and 12 months was 93% and 89%, respectively. A total of 109 patients (42%) had reported an AE. The most frequently reported AEs were fatigue (29%) and diarrhea (14%). No additional safety signal of hepatotoxicity was observed (increased aspartate aminotransferase, 5%; increased alanine transaminase, 6%).ConclusionsIn the present real-world study, second-line and/or beyond PAZ after previous IO therapy was well-tolerated and effective for patients with aRCC.