TightRope治疗Rockwood Ⅲ型肩锁关节脱位失败病例分析

目的分析TightRope治疗肩锁关节脱位失败病例的原因,总结相关经验教训。 方法自2014年1月至2018年4月收治肩锁关节脱位RockwoodⅢ型77例,均采用TightRope重建喙锁韧带治疗,术后发生钢板脱出、松动共6例,分析其手术失败原因。 结果所有患者均获随访,随访时间3~32个月,平均14.30个月,术后3个月Constant评分（93.86±5.59）分。失败病例6例,术后3个月Constant评分（79.17±7.33）分。失败原因包括隧道建立偏斜3例,手术操作不当2例,肩锁关节过度复位1例。 结论TightRope治疗肩锁关节脱位导致失败的因素：严重的骨质疏松,隧道建立偏斜,过度复位等。     

带袢钢板治疗肩锁关节完全性脱位的疗效及其影响因素

目的探讨带袢钢板技术在治疗完全性肩锁关节脱位的疗效及其影响疗效的因素。方法对26例肩锁关节脱位患者采用带袢钢板技术进行手术治疗。摄X线片测量袢钢板距离锁骨远端的相对距离[锁骨袢钢板中点到锁骨远端长度（L1）/锁骨长度（L）]术后6个月复位的丢失量。采用Constant肩关节评分法进行功能评估。结果 26例均获良好的复位。术后3 d喙锁距离为（28.41±4.14）mm,6个月时为（29.71±4.18）mm,平均丢失（1.30±1.18）mm。锁骨的袢钢板固定点和锁骨外缘的相对距离为0.21±0.03。Constant肩关节评分：术前为（30.65±6.18）分,术后为（91.03±5.21）分（t=-38.12,P〈0.001）。结论带袢钢板技术是一种非刚性固定肩锁关节的方式,闭合袢材料的生物力学足以维持肩锁关节的复位,术后疗效满意。骨道的定位、合适长度的袢钢板选择和术后正确的康复是减少术后复位丢失的重要因素。     

关节镜辅助喙锁悬吊固定联合改良Weaver-unn手术治疗陈旧性肩锁关节脱位

目的探讨关节镜辅助喙锁悬吊固定联合改良Weaver-Dunn手术治疗陈旧性肩锁关节脱位的疗效。 方法2016年3月至2017年3月,对8例陈旧性肩锁关节脱位的患者采用关节镜下喙锁间隙悬吊固定联合改良Weaver-Dunn手术,术后随访6~18个月。测量术后即刻与末次随访时的喙锁间隙差值,评估复位丢失情况,采用疼痛视觉模拟（VAS）评分及加州大学洛杉矶分校（UCLA）评分评价患者肩关节功能。 结果术后末次随访时患者喙锁间隙与术后即刻喙锁间隙差值为（0.41±0.26）mm,VAS评分为2.88分,UCLA评分为（173.6±11.3）分,患者肩锁关节丢失率低、术后疼痛及功能均得到明显改善。 结论关节镜辅助喙锁固定联合改良Weaver-Dunn技术治疗陈旧性肩锁关节脱位有较好的疗效。     

Minimalinvasive Akromioklavikulargelenkrekonstruktion (MINAR)

Objective

Reduction and retention of an acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocation with a button/suture augmentation cerclage (Flip tack, Karl Storz, Tuttlingen, Germany).

Indications

Dislocation of the AC joint (Rockwood III and V). Chronic instabilities in combination with autogenous replacement of the coracoclavicular ligaments. Lateral clavicular fracture with rupture of the coracoclavicular ligaments.

Contraindications

Patients in poor general condition. Local soft-tissue infection. Low-degree dislocation of AC joint (Rockwood I und II). Fracture of the clavicular shaft. Chronic instabilities without ligament replacement.

Surgical Technique

The coracoid process is exposed by a 3 cm long skin incision. A hole is drilled through the coracoid process with the help of a specific aiming device. The suture cerclage is connected to two buttons. One of the buttons is then pushed through the coracoid process. The button is flipped and the suture thereby fixed to the coracoid process. The other anchor is pulled through a hole in the clavicle and the cerclage is secured with a surgical knot after reduction of the AC joint.

Postoperative Management

Application of an abduction splint for 4 weeks (15°).

Results

23 patients with an acute luxation of the AC joint were operated with a minimally invasive coracoclavicular cerclage (five patients with Rockwood type III and 18 patients with Rockwood type V). Mean operative time was 28.6 min. Perior postoperative complications such as nerve and vascular injuries, thoracic injuries, infection, thrombosis, and embolism did not occur. The mean Constant Score was 94.1 points (73–100 points) after a mean of 23.3 months (18–28 months). In two cases, a slight loss of reposition of less than half of the clavicle width in comparison with the contralateral side was observed.     

双束Endobutton解剖重建喙锁韧带治疗肩锁关节脱位的早期随访研究

目的观察解剖重建喙锁韧带治疗Rockwood Ⅲ及以上肩锁关节脱位的临床疗效。 方法选取22例肩锁关节脱位患者,其中男15例、女7例,新鲜脱位16例,陈旧性脱位6例,Rockwood Ⅲ型7例、Ⅳ型1例、V型14例。手术方式选择为双束Endobutton解剖重建技术。分别于术后3、6和12个月行疼痛视觉模拟评分及Constant肩关节功能评分,摄双侧肩关节正位X线片,测量患侧及健侧喙锁间距。 结果此研究平均随访时间为（17.7±4.0）个月。疼痛视觉模拟评分从术前的平均5.0分下降到术后12个月的0.2分,Constant肩关节功能评分从术前的平均44.3分提高到术后12个月的93.7分。患侧喙锁间距从术前的平均21.0 mm下降到术后12个月的8.5 mm。所有病例随访过程中均无肩锁关节再脱位、锁骨喙突骨折等严重并发症发生。 结论双束Endobutton解剖重建喙锁韧带是安全可靠的新术式,其应用于Rockwood Ⅲ-V型新鲜或者陈旧性肩锁关节脱位的手术治疗取得了良好的临床效果。     

喙突钢板位置对应用Triple Endobutton技术治疗肩锁关节脱位疗效的影响

目的探讨应用Triple Endobutton技术治疗肩锁关节脱位时喙突钢板位置对疗效的影响。 方法将2010年1月至2015年12月温州医科大学附属第二医院收治67例患者按术后X线中喙突钢板位置分为偏外侧组（n=19）、中央组（n=27）、偏内侧组（n=21）。记录患者一般资料及术后并发症的发生情况,采用Constant评分、视觉模拟评分（visual analogue scale,VAS）及肩关节简单评分（simple shoulder test,SST）综合评估肩关节功能。 结果三组患者总并发症发生率为41.8%（28/67）。三组间并发症发生率（12/19 vs. 6/27 vs. 10/21,P=0.017）及复位丢失率（8/19 vs. 2/27 vs. 5/21,P=0.020）差异有统计学意义,偏外侧组患者并发症发生率显著高于中央组（P <0.01）。三组术后Constant评分分别为（91.2±4.2）分、（94.3±3.6）分、（93.9±4.2）分,中央组及偏内侧组评分高于偏外侧组,差异有统计学意义（P <0.05）,但三组间VAS评分（P=0.742）及SST评分（P=0.258）差异无统计学意义。 结论应用Triple Endobutton技术治疗急性肩锁关节脱位的过程中,喙突骨隧道的位置与临床疗效关系密切,中央型骨隧道并发症少,效果显著。术中透视若发现喙突骨隧道偏移,尤其是向外侧偏移,应立即予以纠正。     

Combination of Clavicular Hook Plate with Coracoacromial Ligament Transposition in Treatment of Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation

ObjectiveTo evaluate the clinical efficacy of Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen (AO) clavicular hook plate (CHP) combined with coracoacromial ligament transposition for Rockwood III‐V dislocation of AC joint, providing an alternative choice for AC joint dislocation treatment.MethodsTwenty‐five patients diagnosed with Rockwood III‐V dislocation of acromioclavicular (AC) joint, including 18 males and seven females, aged 43.5 ± 2.4 years old on average, who had undergone open reduction and AO CHP in combination with coracoacromial (CC) ligament transposition between January 2010 and December 2015, were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 17 cases were diagnosed as type III, five cases were type IV, and three cases were type V. The surgery mainly included three main steps: bone flap incision, drilling in the clavicle, and hook plate fixation and AC joint reposition. The treatment efficacy was evaluated through clinical examinations and imaging studies for the shoulder joint, including gross observation and measuring coracoid clavicle distance (CC‐Dist) using orthophoria X‐ray before and 1 year after the surgery, and University of California (UCLA) shoulder rating scale.ResultsAll the patients were followed up three to four times in 18 months (12–24 months) on average, and the UCLA rating results showed that there were 17 excellent cases (68%), five good cases (20%), and three fair cases (12%). The CC‐Dist values after the surgery reduced to 9.7 ± 0.7 mm, which was significantly (P < 0.05) lower compared to that before the surgery (15.8 ± 1.6 mm). Most (88%) of the cases showed almost normal joint function and good anatomical arrangement of the acromioclavicular joint, without any secondary dislocation, and for them, 12 ± 2 weeks on average were needed to regain the normal function of shoulder joint movement.ConclusionDue to the stable fixation, fewer complications, and satisfactory therapeutic effect with great clinical value, the combination of AO CHP and CC ligament transposition is expected to be used for treating Rockwood III‐V dislocation of AC joint.     

喙锁韧带重建的解剖放射学研究

目的测量不同透视体位下喙锁韧带骨道走行的放射学参数，为临床喙锁韧带重建提供解剖学依据。 方法取22具防腐处理的成人肩关节标本，解剖测量喙锁韧带两部分（斜方韧带，锥状韧带）的走行方向、止点宽度及透视体位下成角。 结果斜方韧带锁骨侧足印宽度（26.2±1.2） mm，喙突侧（22.7±1.6）mm。锥状韧带锁骨侧足印宽度（24.6±1.4）mm，喙突侧（19.2±1.6）mm。影像学测量韧带的插入角度：肩胛骨正位与锥状韧带与锁骨长轴成角（81±4）°，斜方韧带成角（67±7）°。侧位成角：斜方韧带（83±3）°，锥状韧带（70±6）°。与外科标志的毗邻关系：斜方韧带与锥状韧带足印区长轴中心点在锁骨间距（21.9±4.8）mm，在喙突侧间距（15.7±1.6）mm。 结论锥状韧带及斜方韧带止点足印宽度较为恒定，斜方韧带插入角度有变异度较大，锥状韧带较为恒定。两韧带在锁骨及喙突上间距较小。在进行肩锁关节解剖重建时，可参照其解剖学特点。     

Concomitant Acromioclavicular and Coracoclavicular Ligament Reconstruction with a Duo-Figure-8 Autogenic Graft Wrapping Technique for Treating Chronic Acromioclavicular Separation

BackgroudCoracoacromial ligament transfer is the traditional procedure for treating chronic acromioclavicular separation, but it is significantly inferior to ligament reconstruction according to biomechanical and clinical studies. However, ligament reconstruction carries the risk of complications of graft loosening and peri-tunnel fractures. Currently, there is no ligament reconstruction procedure optimal for preventing such complications. The purpose of this study was to describe and retrospectively analyze the clinical and radiological outcomes of a “duo-figure-8” autogenic graft wrapping technique, which was used to concomitantly reconstruct the acromioclavicular and coracoclavicular ligaments.MethodsPreoperative, immediate postoperative, and final follow-up oputcomes were evaluated in 10 enrolled patients. Radiographic outcomes were indicated by the bilateral difference of the coracoclavicular distance (CCD) and overlapping length of the acromioclavicular joint (OLac). Quality of reduction was classified into 4 grades according to bilateral CCD difference into overreduction (< 0 mm), anatomic reduction (0–4 mm), partial loss of reduction (4–8 mm), and recurrent dislocation (> 8 mm). Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) and Constant scores.ResultsThe mean side-to-side differences for CCD were 11.9 mm (preoperative), −0.1 mm (immediate postoperative), and 3.4 mm (final follow-up); those for OLac were 9.4 mm (preoperative) and 2.7 mm (final follow-up). CCD and OLac outcomes significantly improved at final follow-up (p < 0.05). At the immediate postoperative stage, 6 and 4 patients had overreduction and anatomic reduction, respectively. At final follow-up, 7 and 3 patients had anatomic reduction and partial loss of reduction, respectively. The magnitude of improvement of ASES scores for patients with anatomic reduction and partial loss of reduction (p = 0.20) was 18.1 and 20.0, respectively. The magnitude of improvement of Constant scores in patients with anatomic reduction and partial loss of reduction (p = 0.25) was 19.9 and 22.3, respectively.ConclusionsThe technique yielded acceptable functional outcomes in patients with anatomic reduction or partial loss of reduction. The “duo-figure-8” wrapping method—a single autogenic tendon graft passing beneath the coracoid process with a tendon-knot fixation over the distal clavicle and looping around the acromion intramedullary—did not increase the risk of peri-tunnel fractures over the clavicle, coracoid process, or acromion.     

关节镜辅助下三束重建治疗急性Rockwood Ⅲ型肩锁关节脱位

目的探讨关节镜辅助下三束重建治疗急性Rockwood Ⅲ型肩锁关节脱位的临床疗效。 方法回顾性分析上海交通大学医学院附属新华医院骨科采用关节镜辅助下三束重建治疗21例急性Rockwood Ⅲ型肩锁关节脱位患者的资料,均为闭合性损伤。术后3、6、12个月对所有患者进行术后临床效果和影像学评价。根据术后影像学资料评估复位再丢失情况,采用Constant评分和上肢功能（disabilities of arm,shoulder and hand,DASH）评分评估患者肩关节功能。探讨术中关节镜辅助治疗的意义和价值。 结果术中关节镜探查发现4例合并软组织损伤,并进行一期镜下修复。所有患者术后均未发生喙突骨折和襻断裂。影像学评估提示术后6~12个月有6例患者（28.6%）出现轻度复位丢失,但与Constant评分和DASH评分无显著相关性,没有患者要求取出内固定。 结论关节镜辅助下三束重建治疗急性Rockwood Ⅲ型肩锁关节脱位是一种创伤小、安全、临床效果确切的手术方法。急性肩锁关节脱位通常由高能量损伤造成,在手术中关节镜探查肩关节能发现合并的软组织损伤,并进行一期修复,有利于肩关节功能的恢复,避免二次手术。     

Acromioclavicular Joint Reconstruction Using Peroneus Brevis Tendon Allograft

We describe the use of a double-strand peroneus brevis allograft to reconstruct the coracoclavicular and acromioclavicular (AC) joint ligaments. Through sharp dissection, the distal clavicle, the AC joint, and the torn superior AC and coracoacromial ligaments are identified. The coracoid process and injured coracoclavicular ligaments are identified with blunt dissection. A 1-cm segment of the lateral clavicle is resected. Vertical and connecting horizontal tunnels are created (4.5 mm) in the lateral clavicle and in the medial acromion process. The 5.5- to 6.0-mm-diameter allograft is looped around the coracoid process, and both strands are passed through the vertical clavicle tunnel with a nitinol wire loop. One strand passes through the vertical clavicle tunnel, and the other strand passes through the horizontal tunnel, exiting through the lateral end. The allograft strand passed through the vertical clavicle tunnel is then passed inferiorly through the superior vertical acromion tunnel, and the strand passed completely through the horizontal clavicle tunnel is passed laterally through the medial horizontal acromion tunnel. After both strands exit inferiorly through the vertical acromion tunnel, they are tensioned and sutured with AC joint reduction. Soft tissue closure uses No. 0 and No. 2-0 absorbable sutures with No. 3-0 nylon sutures at the skin.     

Biomechanical analysis of acromioclavicular joint dislocation repair using coracoclavicular suspension devices in two different configurations

BackgroundThe best treatment option for some acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocations is controversial. For this reason, the aim of this study was to evaluate the vertical biomechanical behavior of two techniques for the anatomic repair of coracoclavicular (CC) ligaments after an AC injury.ResultsGroup I reached a maximum force to failure of 635.59 N (mean 444.0 N). The corresponding force was 939.37 N (mean 495.6 N) for group II and 533.11 N (mean 343.9 N) for group III. A comparison of the three groups did not find any significant difference despite the loss of resistance presented by group III.ConclusionAnatomic repair of coracoclavicular ligaments with a double system (double tunnel in the clavicle and in the coracoid) permits vertical translation that is more like that of the acromioclavicular joint. Acromioclavicular repair in a “V” configuration does not seem to be biomechanically sufficient.     

应用缝合锚钉解剖重建肩锁关节的临床效果

目的评估应用缝合锚钉重建喙锁韧带,治疗急性肩锁关节脱位的临床结果。 方法自2014年2月至2015年6月接受手术治疗的急性肩锁关节脱位患者13例,其中男性8例、女性5例;平均年龄为（40.0±15.6）岁。应用缝合锚钉重建喙锁韧带,复位固定肩锁关节。术后应用三维CT评估喙突上缝合锚钉的位置情况;通过肩关节正位片评估肩锁关节复位保持情况,并测量喙锁间距;记录肩关节的活动范围、视觉模拟评分（visual analogue scale,VAS）和Constant-Merly评分。 结果所有患者均顺利康复。术后肩关节前屈上举平均为171.5°,体侧外旋为70.8°,体侧内旋为T8。VAS评分为（0.3±0.6）分,Constant-Merly评分为92.4分。术后术侧的喙锁间距平均为（8.9±3.0）mm,健侧的喙锁间距平均为（7.7±1.7）mm,两者之间差异无统计学意义（P=0.119）。26枚锚钉中有23枚位置良好,1枚锚钉刺穿了喙突的下表面,2枚锚钉位置偏向内侧。1例患者肩锁关节复位完全丢失,1例患者肩锁关节复位部分丢失,其Constant-Merly评分分别为74分和84分。 结论通过在喙突基底部准确地置入缝合锚钉,可以解剖重建喙锁韧带,恢复肩锁关节的垂直和水平稳定性。该技术创伤小,可以取得较为满意的临床结果。     

Efficacy of Transosseous Tunnel Placement for Triple Endobutton Plate in Acromioclavicular Joint Reconstruction: A Three‐Dimensional Printing Guide Design Technology

ObjectiveExplore an accurate transosseous tunnel drilling method based on three‐dimensional (3D) printing technology for acromioclavicular joint reconstruction (ACD), design a guide design, and evaluate its accuracy.MethodsUsing Mimics software to reconstruct 100 cases of acromioclavicular joint computed tomography (CT) data. In design 2, the non‐collinear tunnel is superimposed on the 3D model, and a virtual drilling is performed between the clavicle and the coracoid using a triple inner gusset. Then, in the Geomagic Studio software model, an elliptical plane is calculated and extracted as a guide design for precise drilling. Then put the design and the 3D shoulder model together for 3D printing. Ten lengths were measured, and the effects of the virtual model, the actual model, and the guide rail design were compared.ResultsWe successfully compared 10 parameters of 3D virtual model and actual model. There was no significant difference between actual and virtual bone tunnels in 10 measurements (P > 0.05).ConclusionsThe accuracy of ACD combined with 3D printing guidance design technology in the transosseous tunnel of adult shoulder is reliable.     

Arthroscopic Anatomical Acromioclavicular Joint Reconstruction using a Button Device and a Semitendinosus Graft

ObjectiveTo report a new technique for anatomical acromioclavicular (AC) joint reconstruction.MethodsIn order to minimize such complications, the authors describe a new anatomical and biological AC joint repair. This technique aims to provide greater stability by using two anatomically placed clavicular tunnels and a combined construct with a double endobutton cortical fixation for primary stabilization, and to be biologically advantageous by using an autologous semitendinosus (ST) tendon graft. Additionally, the coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction is complemented with an AC joint cerclage and capsular reinforcement, which will protect the biological construction in its initial stage of healing.ResultsThis technique provides adequate primary and secondary biomechanical stability by passing both a semitendinosus autogenous graft and a double endobutton device, through anatomically placed and small diameter clavicle holes, without the need for coracoid drilling. Our technique showed encouraging results regarding pain resolution, range of motion, and function. At final follow‐up we experienced excellent results with average pain score of 1.6, and average ROM of 159° of forward flexion, 160° of abduction, 68° of external rotation, and internal rotation level at T11. Postoperative function also showed great improvements with average ASES of 85 points, an average Constant Score of 87 and a Subjective Shoulder Value of 89 points. This technique also achieved perfectly acceptable radiographic results, with an average coracoclavicular distance increase of 0.8 mm. Regarding complications, our sample showed one case of AC join subluxation, two cases of internal saphenous nerve injury, and two partial graft tears at the suture‐button interface, with none of these requiring surgical revision.ConclusionThis technique is advantageous in treatment of acromioclavicular joint dislocation and can be performed in both the subacute and chronic setting.     

Floating clavicle after a high velocity biking accident: A case report of an acromioclavicular dislocation with simultaneous proximal clavicle fracture managed surgically

IntroductionClavicle fractures and acromioclavicular joint dislocations are very common injuries. However, the combination of both, known as “floating clavicle” is extremely rare, with approximately 40 cases reported.Presentation of caseWe report a case of a healthy 51-year-old male who suffered a high-velocity biking accident, with a bipolar clavicle injury (type IV acromioclavicular joint dislocation and proximal clavicle fracture), with concomitant rib fractures and pulmonary contusion. He received early surgical treatment by open reduction and osteosynthesis of the proximal clavicle (distal ulna plate, Protean®) and open reduction and stabilization with a MINAR® implant for the acromioclavicular joint. After an initial one-month immobilization, he started physical therapy. In the 10-month follow-up he presented with a pain-free full range of motion, a good cosmetic result, and radiological consolidation.DiscussionBipolar clavicle injury is a rare clinical entity that encompasses a spectrum of combined clavicle fractures, acromioclavicular or sternoclavicular joint dislocations. They are sustained in a high-energy context, and accompanying injuries must be sought. Diagnosis is made through X-Ray and CT. Despite the lack of clinical guidelines, most authors agree on surgical management of at least one of the injuries, with multiple surgical techniques available. There is an emphasis in surgical treatment of the young and active patient. Conservative treatment is associated with poorer results.ConclusionIt is advisable to have a high index of suspicion for floating clavicle in a high-energy trauma patient, given possible life-threatening injuries, and long-term shoulder sequelae. Surgery should be considered in a young and active patient.     

双纽扣钢板联合加强锚钉治疗肩锁关节脱位

目的: 探讨双纽扣钢板联合加强锚钉技术与锁骨钩钢板内固定治疗完全性肩锁关节脱位的疗效及预后。方法: 选取2017年7月至2020年9月收治的手术治疗肩锁关节脱位患者42例为研究对象,分为观察组（21例）和对照组（21例）。观察组中,男14例,女7例;年龄21~63（45.05±8.70）岁;对照组中,男16例,女5例;年龄25~68（45.00±9.44）岁。观察组行双纽扣钢板联合加强锚钉技术治疗,对照组行锁骨钩钢板内固定术治疗。比较两组患者手术时间、术中出血量、术后住院时间,术前及术后1、3、6个月肩关节疼痛视觉模拟评分（visual analogue scale,VAS）,肩关节功能Constant-Murley评分以及术后并发症发生情况。结果: 两组术中出血量及术后住院时间比较,差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）;双纽扣钢板联合加强锚钉技术组手术时间（65.24±5.36）min,较锁骨钩钢板组（48.81±4.72） min长（P<0.05）。肩关节功能及疼痛程度测定显示,术前两组差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）;术后1、3、6个月,观察组Constant-Murley评分分别为（73.29±2.15）、（85.43±1.47）、（93.86±1.24）分,与对照组比较差异有统计学意义;VAS评分为（2.76±0.62）、（1.71±0.64）、（0.57±0.51）分,与对照组比较,差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。观察组术后1例肩部疼痛;对照组术后5例肩部疼痛,2例肩关节活动受限,1例肩峰下骨质吸收,两组均未出现复位丢失。结论: 双纽扣钢板联合加强锚钉治疗完全性肩锁关节脱位能够获得良好的临床效果,无须取出内固定,患者肩关节功能恢复情况及疼痛改善情况优于锁骨钩钢板内固定术,更值得临床推广。     

带线铆钉治疗TossyⅡ、Ⅲ型肩锁关节脱位

 目的 探讨带线铆钉治疗TossyⅡ、Ⅲ型肩锁关节脱位的疗效。
方法 2008年1月至2009年2月,治疗TossyⅡ、Ⅲ型肩锁关节脱位患者31例,男19例,女12例;年龄33～49,平均41岁;TossyⅡ型9例,Ⅲ型22例。其中新鲜肩锁关节脱位19例,陈旧性肩锁关节脱位9例,锁骨钩接骨板固定失败3例;患者均不合并骨折。手术均采用Mitek 3.0mm带线铆钉植入喙突,以不可吸收尾线穿过锁骨固定脱位,同时修复喙锁韧带或转移喙肩韧带;其中12例采用克氏针辅助固定。采用日本骨科协会（Japanese Orthopaedic Association,JOA）肩关节疾患治疗判定标准和肩锁关节脱位评分系统对术后疗效进行评价。
结果 31例患者均获得随访,随访时间11～23个月,平均17个月。单纯铆钉固定组术后JOA肩关节疾患评分为65~95分,其中优8例、良9例、可1例、差1例,优良率为89.47%（17/19）;铆钉结合克氏针固定组术后JOA肩关节疾患评分为74~97分,其中优5例、良4例、可3例,优良率为75.00%（9/12）。两组肩锁关节脱位评价系统的优良率分别为94.74%（18/19）和91.67%（11/12）。5例患者在拔除克氏针1~ 3个月后出现肩锁关节复位部分丢失,但肩关节活动范围较术后无明显变化,未进一步治疗。
结论 带线铆钉治疗T ossyⅡ、Ⅲ型肩锁关节脱位,具有手术创伤小,并发症少,避免二次手术的特点,术后疗效肯定。     

Posterior Acromioclavicular Dislocation with Clavicular Fracture and Trapezius Entrapment

AbstractBackground: Posterior acromioclavicular dislocation is rare. Dislocation associated with fracture of the clavicle and simultaneous entrapment of the lateral end of the clavicle by trapezius muscle has not been reported. Posterior dislocation occurs frequently owing to forceful move of the scapula anteriorly and superiorly or from direct force applied to the lateral end of the clavicle and this may be associated with clavicular fracture. In acute dislocations, open reduction, internal joint stabilization and soft tissues reconstruction have been recommended.Case Study: Acute posterior dislocation occurred in a 32-year-old man. The lateral end of the clavicle was displaced posteriorly and inferiorly, and firmly entrapped in trapezius muscle. The clavicular fracture was undisplaced. The coracoclavicular ligaments were stretched but intact. Open reduction was secured with two smooth Kirschner wires. The disrupted soft tissues were repaired. The clavicular fracture was not explored. Shoulder movement started at 6 weeks. Wires were removed. 10 years later he had pain-free, unrestricted shoulder movement, and the radiographs showed wellreduced, essentially normal acromioclavicular joint.Conclusion: Open reduction, internal joint stabilization and soft tissue reconstruction will result in return and long lasting unrestricted pain-free function of the shoulder.     

Midshaft clavicle fractures with associated ipsilateral acromioclavicular joint dislocations: Incidence and risk factors

IntroductionSimultaneous ipsilateral clavicle and acromioclavicular (AC) joint injury have been infrequently reported in the literature at this time. The purpose of this study was to assess incidence as well as assess risk factors for this dual injury pattern.MethodsWe performed a retrospective review of a prospectively collected database (Level III evidence), evaluating 383 adult patients without previous shoulder girdle injury or trauma with a minimum 1-year follow-up who sustained a displaced diaphyseal clavicle fracture. All patients in the study underwent either nonoperative management or surgical reduction and stabilization of a diaphyseal clavicle fracture with a plate and screw construct. Study subjects were followed with serial radiographs. Clavicle and shoulder radiographs, as well as chest radiographs and contralateral films in questionable cases, were used to assess for acromioclavicular joint injury in both operative and nonoperative groups. Additional data was collected on concurrent injuries, patient demographics, fracture characteristics, fixation techniques, surgical/post-operative data, and operative or nonoperative treatment.ResultsWe found that 13/183 (7.1%) of patients undergoing fixation of a diaphyseal clavicle fracture had an ipsilateral AC joint injury, while 13/200 (6.5%) of patients undergoing conservative management had an ipsilateral AC joint injury. Critical analysis of the data revealed that presence of ipsilateral scapular body fractures, and a likely incidental association with superior plating fixation, were associated with an increased rate of this injury pattern.ConclusionsIpsilateral clavicle fracture and AC joint injury is much more common than traditionally believed, with an incidence of 6.8% overall. It is unknown how the presence of an associated AC injury influences outcome, as AC injury was not universally symptomatic.