Improvement in plan quality after Implementation of clinical goals in a large network of cancer centers

Clinical Goals (CG) is a tool available in the Varian Eclipse planning system to objectively and visually evaluate the quality of treatment plans based upon user-defined dose-volume parameters. We defined a set of CG for Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS) and Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) based on published data and guidelines and implemented this in a network of cancer centers in India (American Institute of Oncology). A dosimetric study was performed to compare brain SRS and breast IMRT plan quality before and after CG implementation.The CG defined for SRS plans were target V_100% ≥ 98%, dose gradient measure (GM) ≤ 0.5 cm, conformity index (CI) 1.0 to 1.2. For breast IMRT plans, CG defined target V_100% ≥ 97%, V_95% ≥ 95%, V_107% ≤ 2%, V_105% ≤ 10%, and D_max ≤ 2.4 Gy. Dose limits to organs-at-risk (OAR) were summarize in supplemental materials. Twenty brain SRS and 10 breast IMRT treatment plans that were previously delivered on patients were selected and re-planned using CG. The pre and postoptimized plan parameters were compared using student t-tests.For brain SRS plans, the V₁₀₀, GM, and CI for the pre- and post-Clinical-Goals plans were 93.22% ± 7.2% vs 97.96% ± 0.29% (p = 0.009), 0.63 ± 0.16 vs 0.42 ± 0.05 (p < 0.001) and 1.07 ± 0.18 vs 1.06 ± 0.06 (p = 0.79), respectively. There were no differences in max dose to OARs. In breast IMRT plans, the target V_107% for pre and postimplemented plans were 16.50% ± 10.98% vs 0.32% ± 0.32%, respectively (p = 0.001). The average target V_105% were 44.00% ± 15.72% and 8.69% ± 4.53%, respectively (p < 0.001). No differences were found in the average target V_100% (p = 0.128) and V_95% (p = 0.205). The average target D_max were 112.28% ± 1.59% and 109.14% ± 0.73%, respectively (p < 0.001). There were only minor differences in doses to OARs.The implementation of CG in Varian Eclipse significantly improved SRS and IMRT plan quality with enhanced coverage, dose GM, and CI without increased dose to OARs.     

Feasibility Study of Stereotactic Radiosurgery Treatment of Glomus Jugulare Tumors via HyperArc VMAT

This study aims to report on the clinical validation and feasibility of utilizing a novel fully automated treatment planning and delivery system, HyperArc VMAT stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for glomus jugulare tumors (GJT). Independent dose verification of the HyperArc module via the MD Anderson's SRS head phantom irradiation and credentialing results showed compliance with the SRS treatment requirements per IROC MD Anderson's standard. Following the Alliance clinical trial, AAPM, RTOG protocols, and QUANTEC requirements, utilizing selected three-partial arc geometry of HyperArc module on TrueBeam Linac with 6MV-FFF beam, GJT SRS plans were generated for nine previously treated Gamma Knife (GK) radiosurgery patients using advanced Acuros-based algorithm to account for tissue inhomogeneity corrections and frameless immobilization with Q-fix mask and Encompass device insert. HyperArc VMAT produced highly conformal SRS dose distributions to GJT, a steep dose gradient around the GJT, and spared adjacent critical organs including the spinal cord (< 3.0 Gy). Due to faster patient setup and less MLC modulation through the target (average beam-on time, 6.2 minutes), the HyperArc VMAT plan can deliver a single high-dose of 18 Gy to the GJT in less than 15 minutes overall treatment time, significantly improving patient comfort and clinic workflow. Pretreatment portal dosimetry quality assurance results and independent dose verification via Monte Carlo-based physics second check met our clinical SRS protocol's requirements for treatment. Due to the highly conformal dose distribution, rapid dose fall-off, excellent sparing of adjacent critical organs, and highly precise and accurate treatment, clinical implementation of frameless HyperArc VMAT for GJT patients who may not have access to nor tolerate frame-based GK SRS treatment are underway.     

非小细胞肺癌多发脑转移射波刀放疗的不同计划设计方案分析

目的 对比分析采用射波刀（CyberKnife）立体定向放射治疗多发脑转移的非小细胞肺癌患者时,不同计划设计方式对颅内剂量分布的影响。方法 选取天津医科大学肿瘤医院CyberKnife中心2017年12月至2018年12月期间收治的20例多发脑转移非小细胞肺癌患者进行回顾性分析,对每例患者分别选择单靶区多计划和多靶区单计划进行治疗计划设计。通过对计划靶区（PTV）及其周围正常脑组织、危及器官（OARs）的剂量和适形指数（CI）、实施治疗总节点数和总机器跳数（MUs）对比分析,进行两种物理计划设计方案评价。结果 采用两种设计方式所得治疗计划均能够满足>95% PTV接受处方剂量照射。多靶区单计划方式能够明显降低患者PTV周围正常脑组织受照最高剂量和平均剂量,使得脑干受照最高剂量和平均剂量分别相对下降1.62%和5.57%（t=1.09,P<0.01）,治疗总照射节点数和总机器跳数平均相对下降了4.63%（t=1.87,P<0.01）和1.06%,缩短临床治疗时间。两种方式设计所得治疗计划的CI指数未见明显差异。结论 CyberKnife能够实现对非小细胞肺癌多发脑转移患者的精准立体定向放疗,在进行放射治疗计划设计时,将直径及体积相近的多靶区单计划设计,不仅能够减小患者正常脑组织及OAR的受照剂量,而且能够缩短治疗时间,提高治疗效率。     

Effect of collimator angle on HyperArc stereotactic radiosurgery planning for single and multiple brain metastases

We assessed the effect of collimator angle on the dosimetric parameters for targets and organs at risk (OARs) for collimator-optimized HA (CO-HA) and non-CO-HA (nCO-HA) plans. The nCO-HA and CO-HA plans were retrospectively generated for 26 patients (1 to 8 brain metastases). The dosimetric parameters for planning target volume (homogeneity index [HI]; conformity index [CI]; gradient index [GI]) and for OARs were compared. The modulation complexity score for volumetric modulated arc therapy (MCSV) and monitor units (MUs) were calculated. Doses were measured using the electronic portal imaging device and compared with the expected doses. Dosimetric parameters of the HI, CI, and GI for single (n = 12) and multiple (n = 14) metastases cases were comparable (p > 0.05). For multiple metastases cases, the CO-HA plan provided lower V_4Gy, V_12Gy, V_14Gy, V_16Gy for brain tissue compared to the nCO-HA plan (p < 0.05). Doses for OARs (D_0.1cc) (brainstem, chiasm, Hippocampus, lens, optic nerves, and retinas) were comparable (p > 0.05). For multiple metastases cases, the CO-HA plan resulted in less complex multileaf collimator (MLC) patterns (MCSV = 0.19 ± 0.04, p < 0.01), lower MUs (8596 ± 1390 MUs, p < 0.01), and shorter beam-on time (6.2 ± 1.0 min, p < 0.01) compared to the nCO-HA plan (0.16 ± 0.04, 9365 ± 1630, and 6.7 ± 1.2 for MCSV, MUs, and beam-on time, respectively). For both treatment approach, the equivalent gamma passing rate was obtained with the 3%/3 mm and 2%/2 mm criteria (p > 0.05). The collimator optimization in the HA planning reduced doses to brain tissues and improved the treatment efficacy.     

Pituitary adenoma treatment plan quality comparison between linear accelerator volumetric modulated arc therapy and Leksell Gamma Knife® radiosurgery

The aim of this study was to compare radiosurgical treatment plan quality of a linear accelerator with Leksell Gamma Knife (LGK) for pituitary adenoma irradiation. Thirty pituitary adenoma patients were evaluated in this study. Treatment plans were prepared on LGK and stereotactic linear accelerator Varian TrueBeam STx. Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) plans (21 plans with 2 coplanar arcs and 9 plans with 4 non-coplanar arcs) were calculated for linear accelerator. All the plans were evaluated in terms of conformity, selectivity, gradient index and organ at risk (OAR) sparing. VMAT produced dosimetrically comparable treatment plans to LGK regarding conformity and selectivity (New Conformity Index (NCI): 1.76 ± 0.65 for 4 arc VMAT, 2.33 ± 1,16 for 2 arc VMAT and 1.96 ± 0.71 for LGK; Selectivity Index (SI): 0.63 ± 0.16 for 4 arc VMAT, 0.51 ± 0.16 for 2 arc VMAT and 0.58 ± 0.17 for LGK). Gradient index (GI) was superior for LGK plans (GI: 2.74 ± 0.20 for LGK and 5.28 ± 2.29 for 4 arc VMAT). OAR sparing for optics, brainstem, and hypophysis was similar for both modalities while target volume coverage was maintained the same. Finally, treatment time resulted in favor of VMAT plans (in this study VMAT plans were almost 5 times faster than LGK treatment regarding beam on time). According to the results of this study stereotactic linear accelerator with VMAT treatment could be used as a reasonable alternative to LGK for pituitary adenoma radiosurgery but only if the same head fixation method accuracy and target volume delineation are maintained for both modalities.     

Operation and calibration of the novel PTW 1600SRS detector for the verification of single isocenter stereotactic radiosurgery treatments of multiple small brain metastases

Objectives:The aim of this work was to evaluate the operation of the 1600SRS detector and to develop a calibration procedure for verifying the dose delivered by a single isocenter stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) treatment of small multiple brain metastases (BM).Methods:14 clinical treatment cases were selected with the number of BM ranging from 2 to 11. The dosimetric agreement was investigated between the calculated and the measured dose by an OCTAVIUS 1600SRS array detector in an OCTAVIUS 4D phantom equipped with dedicated SRS top. The cross-calibration procedure deviated from the manufacturer’s as it applied field sizes and dose rates corresponding to the volumetric modulated arc therapy segments in each plan.Results:Measurements with a plan specific cross-calibration showed mean ± standard deviation (SD) agreement scores for cut-off values 50%, 80%, 95%, of 98.6 ± 1.7%, 96.5 ± 4.6%, 97.3 ± 4.4% for the 6 MV plans respectively, and 98.6 ± 1.5%, 96.6 ± 4.0% 96.4 ± 6.3%, for the 6 MV flattening filter free (FFF) plans respectively. Using the default calibration procedure instead of the plan specific calibration could lead to a combined systematic dose offset of 4.1% for our treatment plans.Conclusion:The 1600SRS detector array with the 4D phantom offers an accurate solution to perform routine quality assurance measurements of single isocenter SRS treatments of multiple BM. This work points out the necessity of an adapted cross-calibration procedure.Advances in knowledge:A dedicated calibration procedure enables accurate dosimetry with the 1600SRS detector for small field single isocenter SRS treatment of multiple brain metastases for a large amount of BM.     

A dosimetric comparison between CyberKnife and tomotherapy treatment plans for single brain metastasis

Purpose

Radiosurgery (RS) is a well-established treatment in selected patients with brain metastasis. The aim of this study is to compare the differences between CyberKnife (CK) and TomoTherapy (HT) treatment plans of RS of single brain metastasis (BM) to define when HT should be used in cases beyond Cyberknife—when both systems are readily available for the radiation oncologist.

Methods and materials

Nineteen patients with single brain metastasis treated with CK were re-planned for radiosurgery using TomoTherapy Hi-ART system. Two planning approaches have been used for TomoTherapy plans: the classical one (HT) and the improved conformity (icHT) that produces dose distributions more similar to those of RS plans. PTV coverage, Conformity Index (CI), Paddick Conformity Index (nCI), Homogeneity Index (HI), Gradient Index (GI), and beam on time of CK, HT, and icHT plans were evaluated and compared.

Results

A good coverage was found for CK, HT, and icHT plans. A difference between mean HI of CK and icHT plans was observed (p = 0.007). Better dose gradients compared to both icHT and HT modalities were observed in CK plans. icHT modality showed improved mean CI respect to HT modality, similar to that obtained in CK plans.

Conclusions

CK plans show higher conformity and lower GI than icHT and HT plans. TomoTherapy demonstrates the advantage of being a device capable to reach different clinical objectives depending on the different planning modality employed. CyberKnife and TomoTherapy are both optimal RS devices, the choice to use one over another has to be clinically guided.

     

Evaluation of a novel software application for magnetic resonance distortion correction in cranial stereotactic radiosurgery

This study aimed to validate a novel commercially available software for correcting spatial distortion in cranial magnetic resonance (MR) images. This software has been used to assess the dosimetric impact of MR distortion in stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) treatments of vestibular schwannomas (VSs). Five MR datasets were intentionally distorted. Each distorted MR dataset was corrected using the Cranial Distortion software, obtaining a new corrected MR dataset (MRcorr). The accuracy of the correction was quantified by calculating the target registration error (TRE) for 6 anatomical landmarks identified in the co-registered MRcorr and planning computed tomography (pCT) images. Nine VS cases were included to investigate the impact of the MR distortion in SRS plans. Each SRS plan was calculated on the pCT (1 × 1 × 1 mm³ voxel) with the target and organs at risk (OARs) delineated using the planning MR dataset. This MR dataset was then corrected (MRcorr) using the Cranial Distortion software. Geometrical agreement between the original target and the corresponding corrected target was assessed using several metrics: MacDonald criteria, mean distance to agreement (MDA), and Dice similarity coefficient (DSC). Target coverage (D99%) and maximum doses (D2%) to ipsilateral cochlea and brainstem resulting on the MRcorr dataset were compared with the original values. TRE values (0.6 mm ± 0.3 mm) and differences found in Macdonald criteria (0.3 mm ± 0.4 mm and 0.3 mm ± 0.3 mm) and MDA (0.8 mm ± 0.2 mm) were mostly within the voxel size dimension of the pCT scan (1 × 1 × 1 mm³). High similarity (DSC > 0.7) between the original and corrected targets was found. Small dose differences for the original and corrected structures were found: 0.1 Gy ± 0.1 Gy for target D99%, 0.2 Gy ± 0.3 Gy for cochlea D2%, and 0.1 Gy ± 0.1 Gy for brainstem D2%. Our study shows that Distortion Correction software can be a helpful tool to detect and adequately correct brain MR distortions. However, a negligible dosimetric impact of MR distortion has been detected in our clinical practice.     

CyberKnife stereotactic irradiation for metastatic brain tumors

BACKGROUND: The CyberKnife provides a new technique for performing frameless stereotactic irradiation. So far, few reports have been published on clinical outcomes obtained with the CyberKnife. This report summarizes our clinical experience with CyberKnife irradiation for metastatic brain tumors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy-seven lesions (48 patients) were evaluated and analyzed, and 66 lesions in 41 patients were treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). The prescribed dose was 9 to 30 Gy. RESULTS: Freedom from progression of the tumors was more likely with a prescribed dose of at least 24 Gy than with one of less than 20 Gy (p=0.0244; log-rank test). The CR (complete response) rate was significantly higher when D99 was at least 24 Gy (p=0.0045). There were no severe side effects. CONCLUSION: Stereotactic irradiation with the CyberKnife for metastatic brain tumors is effective and safe. D99 should be at least 24 Gy for CyberKnife SRS treatment.     

Systematic evaluation and plan quality assessment of the Leksell® gamma knife® lightning dose optimizer

To compare stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) plan quality metrics of manual forward planning (MFP) and Elekta Fast Inverse Planning? (FIP)-based inversely optimized plans for patients treated with Gamma Knife®. Clinically treated, MFP SRS plans for 100 consecutive patients (115 lesions; 67 metastatic and 48 benign) were replanned with the FIP dose optimizer based on a convex linear programming formulation. Comparative plans were generated to match or exceed the following metrics in order of importance: Target Coverage (TC), Paddick Conformity Index (PCI), beam-on time (BOT), and Gradient Index (GI). Plan quality metrics and delivery parameters between MFP and FIP were compared for all lesions and stratified into subgroups for further analysis. Additionally, performance of FIP for multiple punctate (<4 mm) metastatic lesions on a subset of cases was investigated. A Wilcoxon signed-rank test for non-normal distributions was used to assess the statistical differences between the MFP and FIP treatment plans. Overall, 76% (87/115) of FIP plans showed a statistically significant improvement in plan quality compared to MFP plans. As compared to MFP, FIP plans demonstrated an increase in the median PCI by 1.1% (p<0.01), a decrease in GI by 3.7% (p< 0.01), and an increase in median number of shots by 74% (p< 0.01). TC and BOT were not statistically significantly different between MFP and FIP plans (p>0.05). FIP plans showed a statistically significant increase in use of 16 mm (p< 0.01) and blocked shots (p< 0.01), with a corresponding decrease in 4 mm shots (p< 0.01). Use of multiple shots per coordinate was significantly higher in FIP plans (p<0.01). The FIP optimizer failed to generate a clinically acceptable plan in 4/115 (3.5%) lesions despite optimization parameter changes. The mean optimization time for FIP plans was 5.0 min (Range: 1.0 – 10.0 min). In the setting of multiple punctate lesions, PCI for FIP was significantly improved (p<0.01) by changing the default low-dose/BOT penalty optimization setting from a default of 50/50 to 75-85/40. FIP offers a significant reduction in manual effort for SRS treatment planning while achieving comparable plan quality to an expert planner—substantially improving overall planning efficiency. FIP plans employ a non-intuitive increased use of blocked sectors and shot-in-shot technique to achieve high quality plans. Several FIP plans failed to achieve clinically acceptable treatments and warrant further investigation.     

A dosimetric evaluation of the Eclipse AAA algorithm and Millennium 120 MLC for cranial intensity-modulated radiosurgery

The aim of this study is to assess the accuracy of a convolution-based algorithm (anisotropic analytical algorithm [AAA]) implemented in the Eclipse planning system for intensity-modulated radiosurgery (IMRS) planning of small cranial targets by using a 5-mm leaf-width multileaf collimator (MLC). Overall, 24 patient-based IMRS plans for cranial lesions of variable size (0.3 to 15.1 cc) were planned (Eclipse, AAA, version 10.0.28) using fixed field-based IMRS produced by a Varian linear accelerator equipped with a 120 MLC (5-mm width on central leaves). Plan accuracy was evaluated according to phantom-based measurements performed with radiochromic film (EBT2, ISP, Wayne, NJ). Film 2D dose distributions were performed with the FilmQA Pro software (version 2011, Ashland, OH) by using the triple-channel dosimetry method. Comparison between computed and measured 2D dose distributions was performed using the gamma method (3%/1 mm). Performance of the MLC was checked by inspection of the DynaLog files created by the linear accelerator during the delivery of each dynamic field. The absolute difference between the calculated and measured isocenter doses for all the IMRS plans was 2.5% ± 2.1%. The gamma evaluation method resulted in high average passing rates of 98.9% ± 1.4% (red channel) and 98.9% ± 1.5% (blue and green channels). DynaLog file analysis revealed a maximum root mean square error of 0.46 mm. According to our results, we conclude that the Eclipse/AAA algorithm provides accurate cranial IMRS dose distributions that may be accurately delivered by a Varian linac equipped with a Millennium 120 MLC.     

The use of RapidArc volumetric-modulated arc therapy to deliver stereotactic radiosurgery and stereotactic body radiotherapy to intracranial and extracranial targets

Twenty-three targets in 16 patients treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) were analyzed in terms of dosimetric homogeneity, target conformity, organ-at-risk (OAR) sparing, monitor unit (MU) usage, and beam-on time per fraction using RapidArc volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) vs. multifield sliding-window intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). Patients underwent computed tomography simulation with site-specific immobilization. Magnetic resonance imaging fusion and optical tracking were incorporated as clinically indicated. Treatment planning was performed using Eclipse v8.6 to generate sliding-window IMRT and 1-arc and 2-arc RapidArc plans. Dosimetric parameters used for target analysis were RTOG conformity index (CI_RTOG), homogeneity index (HI_RTOG), inverse Paddick Conformity Index (PCI), D_mean and D5–D95. OAR sparing was analyzed in terms of D_max and D_mean. Treatment delivery was evaluated based on measured beam-on times delivered on a Varian Trilogy linear accelerator and recorded MU values. Dosimetric conformity, homogeneity, and OAR sparing were comparable between IMRT, 1-arc RapidArc and 2-arc RapidArc plans. Mean beam-on times ± SD for IMRT and 1-arc and 2-arc treatments were 10.5 ± 7.3, 2.6 ± 1.6, and 3.0 ± 1.1 minutes, respectively. Mean MUs were 3041, 1774, and 1676 for IMRT, 1-, and 2-arc plans, respectively. Although dosimetric conformity, homogeneity, and OAR sparing were similar between these techniques, SRS and SBRT fractions treated with RapidArc were delivered with substantially less beam-on time and fewer MUs than IMRT. The rapid delivery of SRS and SBRT with RapidArc improved workflow on the linac with these otherwise time-consuming treatments and limited the potential for intrafraction organ and patient motion, which can cause significant dosimetric errors. These clinically important advantages make image-guided RapidArc useful in the delivery of SRS and SBRT to intracranial and extracranial targets.     

Independent dose verification for brain stereotactic radiotherapy using different add-on micro multi-leaf collimators

An add-on micro multi-leaf collimator (mMLC) is used for stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and brain stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT), in which rotational radiotherapy may make more complex and time-consuming. We performed a retrospective study of an independent dose calculation verification for brain SRS and SRT in two institutions to show the accuracy of the verification system and propose a tolerance value for the verification. Several comparisons of static plans and patients’ plans were conducted using a phantom measurement, and patients’ plans using the patients’ own computed tomography image. We evaluated the accuracy of the Clarkson-based dose calculation based on either the equivalent square field formed by the mMLC or by the collimator jaws to determine the collimator scatter factor (S _c). The results for the static plans showed good agreement (<1%), except when we used a 1 cm² field size (<4%). The phantom measurements for the patients’ plans showed deviations of 0.1 ± 2.3 and 1.2 ± 1.6% (2 SD) for the treatment planning system and the verification system, respectively. The patients’ plans showed a deviation of 2.0 ± 2.1% (2 SD). Depending on the mMLC system, the S _c was calculated using the equivalent field size formed by the mMLC. In this study, we suggest a tolerance level for the brain SRS and SRT of 2–3.5%. However, beam modeling in the treatment planning system would affect the deviation. The S _c should be computed according to the size of the collimator fitted to the MLC.     

难治性脑转移瘤的立体定向放射外科治疗策略及进展

脑转移瘤是发病率高、临床治疗难度大且预后较差的颅内常见恶性疾病,特别是其中的难治性脑转移瘤（大体积、多发、复发的转移瘤）常规治疗难以达到理想预后。立体定向放射外科（SRS）与常规治疗方式相比具有精准度高、单次照射剂量大、对周围组织损伤低等优势,已逐渐成为脑转移瘤患者治疗的首选方案。SRS治疗难治性脑转移瘤具有较好的效果,可有效抑制肿瘤增殖,提高患者的生活质量。SRS联合手术、化疗、分子靶向治疗及免疫治疗等方案可以提高难治性脑转移瘤患者的肿瘤局部控制率,但是否改善患者的预后尚存在争议,且联合治疗的不良反应也应引起关注。因此,本文就SRS治疗难治性脑转移瘤的治疗效果及联合治疗的策略及进展等方面进行文献报道综述。