Capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (xelox) versus protracted 5-fluorouracil venous infusion plus oxaliplatin (pvifox) as first-line treatment in advanced colorectal cancer: a GOAM phase II randomised study (FOCA trial)

This phase II randomised trial compares oxaliplatin plus protracted infusion of 5-fluorouracil (pviFOX) or oxaliplatin plus capecitabine (XELOX) in the first-line treatment of advanced colorectal cancer (ACRC). Methods: From December 2001 to March 2005, 118 patients were randomised to arm A ( pviFOX: pvi5-FU by a central venous catheter 250 mg/m2/daily d1-21 + oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 d1 q3w) (56 pts) or arm B (XELOX: capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 po bid d1-14 + oxaliplatin at the same schedule) (62 pts). Results: Patient characteristics were well-balanced between the two arms. Median number of complete cycles was six. The objective responses were: CR 1 (1.7%) and 3 (4.8%), PR 26 (46.4 %) and 24 (38.7%), SD 13 (23.2%) and 20 (32.3%), P 13(23.2%) and 10 (16.1%), not evaluable 3 (5.4%) and 5 (8.1 %) in arms A and B, respectively; the CR + PR rate was 48.2% (95% confidence limits 34.6%–61.9%) versus 43.5 % (31.0%–56.7%). Median TTP was 7 versus 9 months, respectively. About 50% of the patients with symptoms or low performance status at baseline experienced improvement without major differences between the two arms. G3–4 diarrhoea was observed in 14.0% versus 8.2%, G3 stomatitis in 3.7% versus 0, and G3 neurotoxicity in 18.5% versus 24.6% in arms A and B, respectively. Eight patients in arm A (14.8%) had venous line problems that obliged the temporary suspension (six cases) or stopping (two cases) of the 5-FU infusion. Conclusion: Both pviFOX and XELOX are effective and safe first-line treatments for patients with ACRC. By avoiding intravenous (i.v.) administration by a central catheter, XELOX is favoured in clinical practice.     

Protracted infusional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) with bolus mitomycin in 5-FU-resistant colorectal cancer

Background:MF (protracted infusion 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), 300mg/m²/24 hours plus bolus mitomycin, 7 mg/m² every 6weeks, maximum 4 doses), was recently shown in a randomised trial to besuperior to protracted 5-FU alone, as first-line chemotherapy for metastaticcolorectal cancer (Ross et al. Ann Oncol 1997; 8: 995–1001 [5]). We haveexamined the same regimen in patients with 5-FU-resistant disease. Patients and methods:MF was given to 24 patients with metastaticcolorectal cancer, median age 63 years. Two had progressed within four monthsof adjuvant 5-FU; the rest had already received palliative 5-FU, withprogression during (11 patients), within four months (5 patients) or afterfour months of completion (6 patients). The prior 5-FU regimens were bolus5-FU/FA (8 patients); 48 hour bolus + infusion 5-FU/FA (18 patients) orprotracted 5-FU alone (3 patients). Five patients had received more than oneprior 5-FU regimen. Results:Three patients, 12.5%, achieved WHO partialresponse; seven others had minor response or stable disease (SD or better =42%, 95% confidence interval (95% CI):22%–64%). Median failure-free survival (FFS) was 15 weeks;median overall survival was 9.0 months. No grade 3 or 4 drug toxicityoccurred, but dose reduction and/or interruption for persistent grade 2toxicity was required in eight patients (33%). Three patients(12.5%) had venous line problems (2 thrombosis; 1 dislodged). Therewere no toxic deaths. 12 patients (50%) went on to receive third-linetherapy after MF, including irinotecan or oxaliplatin. Conclusions:MF is a low-cost, well-tolerated regimen insecond-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. The response rate andFFS obtained in this small group are similar to those reported for singleagent irinotecan. Half our patients obtained a useful period of control withMF before moving on to further treatment with new agents such as irinotecanand oxaliplatin.     

Bimonthly high-dose leucovorin, 5-fluorouracil infusion and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX3) for metastatic colorectal cancer resistant to the same leucovorin and 5-fluorouracil regimen

Background: FOLFOX2, a bimonthly regimen of high-dose leucovorin (LV), 48-hour continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) (LV–5-FU) and oxaliplatin (100 mg/m2) produced a high response rate (46%; 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 31%–60%) in 5-FU pre-treated patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. In this phase II study, pre-treated patients were given a lower dose of oxaliplatin to reduce the toxic effects of the regimen.Patients and methods: Thirty patients with advanced colorectal adenocarcinoma and progression while receiving bimonthly LV–5-FU (LV: 500 mg/m2, 5-FU: 1.5–2 g /m2/ 22 hours, days 1–2, every two weeks), were given the same LV–5-FU schedule with the addition of oxaliplatin (85 mg/m2) every two weeks (FOLFOX3).Results: The main toxic effects were peripheral neuropathy (90%) with four severe sensitive neuropathies (WHO grade 2: 13%). The response rate was 20% (95% CI: 8%–39%). Median progression-free survival was 26 weeks, median survival was 57 weeks from the start of FOLFOX3 and median duration of the response was 37 weeks.Conclusions: Results obtained with FOLFOX3 confirmed the synergy between oxaliplatin and 5-FU in 5-FU-resistant metastatic colorectal cancer. However, the response rate seems to be lower than that obtained with FOLFOX2. Further studies to determine the best oxaliplatin dose intensity are in progress.     

Factors predicting efficacy of oxaliplatin in combination with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) +/- folinic acid in a compassionate-use cohort of 481 5-FU-resistant advanced colorectal cancer patients

A statistical analysis was performed on the patient data collected from two compassionate-use programmes using oxaliplatin (Eloxatin(R)) + 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) +/- folinic acid (FA), to identify predictive factors for oxaliplatin-based salvage treatment in patients with 5-FU-resistant advanced colorectal cancer (ACRC). 481 5-FU-resistant ACRC patients, most with performance status < or = 2, > or = 3 involved sites, and > or = 2 prior lines of chemotherapy, received oxaliplatin + 5-FU +/- FA. Prognostic factors associated with overall response rate (ORR), time to progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS) were identified using univariate and multivariate logistic and/or Cox proportional hazards analyses. The ORR was 16% (95% CI: 13-20), the median TTP was 4.2 months (95% CI: 3.4-4.6), and the median OS was 9.6 months (95% CI: 8.6-10.6). The multivariate analysis indicated poor (> or = 2 WHO) performance status (PS), a large number of prior chemotherapy regimens (> or = 3), a low baseline haemoglobin level (< 10 g/dl), and a triweekly (vs biweekly) treatment administration schedule as significantly associated (P< 0.05) with a lower ORR. Sex (male), number of organs involved (> or =3) and alkaline phosphatase (AP) level (> or = 2 x the upper limit of normal) were associated (P< 0.05) with shorter TTP. Poor PS, a large number of organs involved, and elevated AP were independently and significantly correlated with shorter OS. Our analysis identified a relationship between efficacy results of oxaliplatin + 5-FU +/- FA treatment in 5-FU-resistant ACRC patients and baseline prognostic factors related to PS, extent of disease and number of prior regimens.     

Multiple-target chemotherapy (LV-modulated 5-FU bolus and continuous infusion, oxaliplatin, CPT- 11) in advanced 5-FU-refractory colorectal cancer: MTD definition and efficacy evaluation. A phase I-II study

AIMS AND BACKGROUND: To identify the maximum tolerated doses and to define the activity of a regimen incorporating leucovorin (LV)-modulated 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) bolus and continuous infusion, oxaliplatin (I-OHP) and irinotecan (CPT-11) in patients with advanced, 5-FU-refractory colorectal cancer (CRC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Starting doses: LV 100 mg/m2 as a 2-hour infusion followed by 5-FU 300 mg/m2 bolus administration followed by 5-FU 500 mg/m2 as a 22-hour infusion on days 1 and 2; I-OHP 65 mg/m2 as a 2-hour infusion concomitantly with LV on day 1; CPT-11 90 mg/m2 concomitantly with LV on day 2. Planned cycle interval: 2 weeks. RESULTS: Two hundred twenty-six cycles were administered to 27 patients. Recommended doses were 5-FU bolus 300 mg/m2, 5-FU protracted infusion 500 mg/m2, I-OHP 75 mg/m2, and CPT-11 150 mg/m2. Among 25 patients evaluable for response we observed 13 disease stabilizations (52%; 95% CI: 33-71%), 6 instances of disease progression and 6 responses (24%; 95% CI: 7-41%). Median time to progression and overall survival were 24 and 60 weeks, respectively. A cycle delay > 3 days was observed in 134/199 cycles (67%). CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms the feasibility of triplet chemotherapy in patients with advanced 5-FU-refractory CRC.     

Gemcitabine (GEM) plus oxaliplatin, folinic acid, and 5-fluorouracil (FOLFOX-4) in patients with advanced gastric cancer

Background and aims: oxaliplatin in combination with folinic acid (FA) and infusional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) has shown significant anti-tumor activity in gastric cancer patients (FOLFOX). Previous studies have shown that gemcitabine (GEM), a new fluorinated anti-metabolite, enhances the individual anti-tumor activity of either 5-FU or oxaliplatin. We have therefore designed a multi-center phase II trial in order to test a novel GEM + FOLFOX-4 regimen in patients with metastatic gastric cancer. Methods: we enrolled 36 patients, 28 males and 8 females, with an average age of 64.4 years (range 37–78), who received bi-weekly treatment with GEM (1,000 mg/m² on day 1), levo-FA (100 mg/m² on days 1 and 2), a 5-FU (400 mg/m²) bolus injection followed by 22-h continuous infusion (800 mg/m²) on days 1 and 2, and oxaliplatin 85 mg/m² in a 4–6 h intravenous (i.v.) infusion before the second FUFA administration on day 2. Results: the most frequent side effect was grade 1–2 hematological toxicity and late sensorial neurotoxicity. Two patients developed hypersensitivity to oxaliplatin while another developed an aseptic eosinophilic pneumonitis. Two patients refused to continue the treatment after two cycles of chemotherapy and were lost at the follow-up. Among the remaining 34 patients four achieved a complete response, 15 a partial response, 12 had a stable disease and three progressed. Conclusions: these results may grant the rationale to evaluate this multi-drug combination in randomized phase III trials in advanced gastric cancer.     

Factors predicting for efficacy of oxaliplatin in combination with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)+/-folinic acid (FA) in a compassionate-use cohort of 370 5-FU-resistant advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) patients

Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed on data from 370 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-resistant advanced colorectal cancer patients treated with oxaliplatin (Eloxatin®)/5-FU±folinic acid (FA) to identify prognostic factors for oxaliplatin-based treatment. The response rate was 14.6% (95% confidence interval (CI): 11.0–18.2%), median time to progression was 4.3 months (95% CI: 3.9–4.7), and median overall survival 9.7 months (95% CI: 8.5–10.8). Multivariate analysis indicated <2 prior chemotherapy regimens, bi-weekly treatment administration schedule (versus tri-weekly) and continuous chronomodulated delivery (CCM) as significantly associated (P<0.05) with a higher overall response rate. Performance status (PS) <2, having only one involved organ, biweekly schedule and CCM were associated (P<0.05) with a longer time to progression. Good PS, one involved organ, low alkaline phosphatase (AP) serum levels, bi-weekly schedule and CCM were significantly correlated with longer overall survival, while confirming the efficacy of oxaliplatin/5-FU±FA in this indication.     

Second-line chemotherapy with weekly oxaliplatin and high-dose 5-fluorouracil with folinic acid in metastatic colorectal carcinoma: A Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group (HeCOG) phase II feasibility study

Backround:Oxaliplatin is a novel platinum derivative, which,combined with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), and folinic acid (FA), demonstratessynergistic activity in metastatic colorectal cancer (MCC). The HeCOGperformed a multicenter phase II study of a weekly oxaliplatin administrationschedule in patients with previously treated MCC to evaluate the antitumorefficacy and toxicity of this combination. Patients and methods:Eligible patients included those whorelapsed after or during chemotherapy with 5-FU and FA and/or irinotecan.Prior radiotherapy was accepted provided that measurable disease was outsidethe radiation fields. Other eligibility criteria included written informedconsent, a WHO performance status 2 and adequate bone marrow, liver andrenal function. Treatment consisted of Oxaliplatin 50 mg/m² bytwo-hour intravenous (i.v.) infusion followed by FA 500 mg/m²(two-hour i.v. infusion) and 5-FU 2500 mg/m² (24-hour continuousi.v. infusion) on days 1, 8, 15, 22, 29, 36. The regimen was repeated every50 days. Results:Thirty-two patients (Median age 61 years, range25–76) entered the trial. The majority (75%) had progressed afterreceiving first-line chemotherapy.Diarrhea was the main non-hematologic toxicity. More than half of thepatients (53%) developed grades 3 or 4 diarrhea. Due to this sideeffect only 29% of cycles were given with at least 90% of theplanned dose of 5-FU. Hematologic toxicity included grade 3 neutropenia andthrombocytopenia (10% for each), and grade 4 thrombocytopenia(3%). Two patients (6%) died of sepsis, one related toneutropenia and one due to urinary tract sepsis. Sixteen patients (50%)developed grades 1 and 2 neurotoxicity in the form of sensory neuropathy,which was mild and transient. The objective response rate was 13%(95% CI: 3%–29%). All four responses were partial.Twelve patients (38%) had stable disease and 8 (25%) progressivedisease. The median time to progression was three months and the mediansurvival was nine months from the start of therapy. The Kaplan–Meierestimated probability of one-year survival for the group as a whole was32%. Conclusions:The weekly administration of oxaliplatin with 5-FUand FA was associated with considerably less neurotoxicity than otherschedules. However, the high percentage of diarrhea suggests that a dosereduction of 5-FU in this regimen may result in better therapeutic synergy.     

A phase II study of the modulation of 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid with high-dose infusional hydroxyurea in metastatic colorectal carcinoma

Background: Hydroxyurea (HU), an inhibitor of ribonucleotide reductase, may potentiate the activity of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and folinic acid (FA) by reducing the deoxyribonucleotide pool available for DNA synthesis and repair. However as HU may inhibit the formation of 5-fluoro-2-deoxyuridine-5-monophosphate (FdUMP), one of the principal active metabolites of 5-FU, the scheduling of HU may be critical. In vitro experiments suggest that administration of HU following 5-FU, maintaining the concentration in the region of 1 mM for six or more hours, significantly enhances the efficacy of 5-FU.Patients and methods: 5-FU/FA was given as follows: days 1 and 2 – FA 250 mg/m² (max. 350 mg) over two hours followed by 5-FU 400 mg/m² by intravenous bolus (ivb) over 15 minutes and subsequently 5-FU 400 mg/m² infusion (ivi) over 22 hours. HU was administered on day 3 immediately after the 5-FU with 3 g ivb over 15 minutes followed by 12 g ivi over 12 hours.Results: Thirty patients were entered into the study. Median survival was nine months (range 1–51+ months). There were eight partial responses (28%, 95% CI: 13%–47%). The median duration of response was 6.5 (range 4–9 months). Grade 3–4 toxicities included neutropenia (grade 3 in eight patients and grade 4 in five), anaemia (grade 3 in one patient) and diarrhoea (grade 3 in two patients). Neutropenia was associated with pyrexia in two patients. Phlebitis at the infusion site occurred in five patients. The treatment was complicated by pulmonary embolism in one patient and deep venous thrombosis in another.Conclusion: HU administered in this schedule is well tolerated. Based on these results and those of other phase II studies, a randomised phase III study of 5-FU, FA and HU versus 5-FU and FA using the standard de Gramont schedule is recommended.     

Oxaliplatin: A review of preclinical and clinical studies

Of the new generation platinum compounds that have been evaluated, those with the 1,2-diaminocyclohexane carrier ligand – including oxaliplatin – have been focused upon in recent years. Molecular biology studies and the National Cancer Institute in vitro cytotoxic screening showed that diaminocyclohexane platinums such as oxaliplatin belong to a distinct cytotoxic family, differing from cisplatin and carboplatin, with specific intracellular target(s), mechanism(s) of action and/or mechanism(s) of resistance.In phase I trials, the dose-limiting toxicity of oxaliplatin was characterized by transient acute dysesthesias and cumulative distal neurotoxicity, which was reversible within a few months after treatment discontinuation. Moreover, oxaliplatin did not display any, auditory, renal and hematologic dose-limiting toxicity at the recommended dose of 130 mg/m2 q three weeks or 85 mg/m2 q two weeks given as a two-hour i.v. infusion. Clinical phase II experiences on the antitumoral activity of oxaliplatin have been conducted in hundreds of patients with advanced colorectal cancers (ACRC). Single agent activity reported as objective response rate in ACRC patients is 10% and 20% overall in ACRC patients with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) pretreated/refractory and previously untreated ACRC, respectively.Synergistic cytotoxic effects in preclinical studies with thymidylate synthase inhibitors, cisplatin/carboplatin and topoisomerase I inhibitors, and the absence of hematologic dose-limiting toxicity have made oxaliplatin an attractive compound for combinations. Phase II trials combining oxaliplatin with 5-FU and folinic acid ACRC patients previously treated/refractory to 5-FU showed overall response rates ranging from 21% to 58%, and survivals ranging from 12 to 17 months. In patients with previously untreated ACRC, combinations of oxaliplatin with 5-FU and folinic acid showed response rates ranging from 34% to 67% and median survivals ranging from 15 to 19 months. Two randomized trials totaling 620 previously untreated patients with ACRC, comparing 5-FU and folinic acid to the same regimen with oxaliplatin, have shown a 34% overall response rate in the oxaliplatin group versus 12% in the 5-FU/folinic acid group for the first trial; and 51.2% vs. 22.6% in the second one. These statistically significant differences were confirmed in time to progression advantage for the oxaliplatin arm (8.7 vs. 6.1 months, and 8.7 vs. 6.1 months, respectively). A small but consistent number of histological complete responses have been reported in patients with advanced colorectal cancer treated with the combination of oxaliplatin with 5-FU/folinic acid, and secondary metastasectomy is increasingly done by oncologists familiar with the combination.Based on preclinical and clinical reports showing additive or synergistic effects between oxaliplatin and several anticancer drugs including cisplatin, irinotecan, topotecan, and paclitaxel, clinical trials of combinations with other compounds have been performed or are still ongoing in tumor types in which oxaliplatin alone showed antitumoral activity such as ovarian, non-small-cell lung, breast cancer and non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Its single agent and combination therapy data in ovarian cancer confirm its non-cross resistance with cisplatin/carboplatin. While the role of oxaliplatin in medical oncology is yet to be fully defined, it appears to be an important new anticancer agent.     

A phase II trial of gemcitabine in combination with 5-fluorouracil (24-hour) and folinic acid in patients with chemonaive advanced pancreatic cancer

Background:Gemcitabine (Gemzar®) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)plus folinic acid (FA) both have proven activity in the treatment of patientswith advanced pancreatic cancer. The present study was initiated toinvestigate the efficacy of gemcitabine in combination with 5-FU–FA. Patients and methods:Thirty-eight patients, median age 60 years(range 34–70) with inoperable, stage IV, pancreatic cancer were enrolledinto the study and treated on an outpatient basis. All except one patientreceived at least one cycle of treatment with gemcitabine (1000mg/m²), followed by FA (200 mg/m²) and 5-FU (750mg/m²) administered as a 24-hour continuous infusion on days 1, 8,15 and 22 of a 42-day schedule. No patient had received prior chemotherapy orradiotherapy. All 38 patients were assessed for efficacy, toxicity and timeto progressive disease. Results:Two patients (5%), achieved a partial response andthirty-four patients (89%) achieved stable disease. There were twoearly deaths (4 weeks). The median time to progression was 7.1 months(range 0.4–18.1+; 95% confidence interval (95% CI):5.3–7.9 months). Three patients had a progression-free interval ofgreater than 12 months and 12 of 38 patients (32%) survived longer than12 months. The median overall survival was 9.3 months (range 0.5–26.5;95% CI: 7.3–13.0 months). The incidence of grade 3 and 4toxicities was low. Conclusions:The combination of gemcitabine and 5-FU–FA isactive and well tolerated and seems to offer an improvement inprogression-free interval over both gemcitabine monotherapy and 5-FU–FAtherapy.     

A randomised phase II study of oxaliplatin alone versus oxaliplatin combined with 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid (Mayo Clinic regimen) in previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer patients

The aim of this study was to examine the efficacy and safety of both oxaliplatin as a single agent and oxaliplatin in combination with dailyx5 bolus 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid (5-FU/FA, Mayo clinic regimen) in the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. 73 advanced CRC patients were randomised to receive either oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2) every 2 weeks (35 patients), or the same treatment combined with 5-FU 425 mg/m(2)/day and FA 20 mg/m(2)/dayx5 days every 4 weeks (38 patients). Treatment was continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. All patients had documented inoperable disease and no previous chemotherapy for advanced disease. Based on the investigators' assessment of best response, objective response rate was 9% (95% confidence interval (CI) 2-24%) in the oxaliplatin arm, and 45% (95% CI 27-64%) in the oxaliplatin+5-FU/FA arm. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 2 months (95% CI 1.7-2.4 months) in the oxaliplatin arm and 3.9 months (95% CI 2.9-5 months) in the oxaliplatin+5-FU/FA arm. Severe neutropenia was seen in 23% of patients in the oxaliplatin+5-FU/FA arm, and none in the oxaliplatin arm. There were two treatment-related deaths, both in the oxaliplatin+5-FU/FA arm. In the oxaliplatin+5-FU/FA arm, severe diarrhoea, vomiting and stomatitis were seen in 34, 14 and 14% of the patients, respectively. In conclusion, oxaliplatin at a dose of 85 mg/m(2) given every 2 weeks was well tolerated and has limited activity in metastatic CRC, while the combination of this treatment with the full-dose Mayo clinic regimen (5-FU bolus 425 mg/m(2)/day+FA 20 mg/m(2)/dayx5 days every 4 weeks), although active, was unfeasible due to a high level of myelosuppression and gastrointestinal toxicity. Alternative lower dosing or other regimens are to be explored to ascertain the value of bolus 5-FU/FA combined with oxaliplatin.     

Survival impact of chemotherapy in patients with colorectal metastases confined to the liver: A re-analysis of 1458 non-operable patients randomised in 22 trials and 4 meta-analyses

Background: Metastases confined to the liver is a frequent situation in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. For non-operable patients, 5-FU-based chemotherapy is often proposed but the importance of the choice of first line 5-FU regimen remains debatable.Design: In four previously performed meta-analyses, our group had compared bolus intravenous fluoropyrimidines (bolus FU group) with experimental fluoropyrimidines (experimental FU group), consisting of 5-FU plus leucovorin, 5-FU plus methotrexate, continuous infusion 5-FU, or hepatic-artery infusion FUDR. We re-analysed this data set to focus on 1458 patients with non-operable colorectal metastases confined to the liver, randomised in 22 trials. All analyses were stratified by trial and used individual patient data.Results: Median survival times were 11.3 months in the bolus FU group (95% CI: 10.5–12.0 months) compared to 12.7 months in the experimental FU group (95% CI: 12.0–13.1 months). This difference, although clinically small, was statistically significant, with an overall survival hazard ratio of 0.88 (95% CI: 0.79–0.99, P = 0.037). In a multivariate analysis, performance status was the only significant predictor of survival (P < 10^–4), whereas the statistical significance of allocated treatment was borderline (P = 0.058).Conclusions: The outcome of patient with non-operable colorectal metastases confined to the liver is poor, and mainly driven by their initial performance status. Experimental chemotherapy schedules yield a small improvement in their overall survival, indicating the importance of the choice of first-line chemotherapy.     

Biweekly irinotecan or raltitrexed plus 6S-leucovorin and bolus 5-fluorouracil in advanced colorectal carcinoma: a Southern Italy Cooperative Oncology Group phase II-III randomized trial.

Purpose:The aim of this randomised trial was to evaluate theactivity and toxicity of a biweekly regimen including 6S-leucovorin-modulated5-fluorouracil (LFA–5-FU), combined with either irinotecan (CPT-11 +LFA–5-FU) or raltitrexed (Tomudex®) (TOM + LFA–5-FU), inadvanced colorectal cancer patients, and to make a preliminary comparison ofboth these experimental regimens with a biweekly administration ofLFA–5-FU modulated by methotrexate (MTX + LFA–5-FU). Patients and methods:One hundred fifty-nine patients withadvanced colorectal carcinoma previously untreated for the metastatic disease(34 of them previously exposed to adjuvant 5-FU) were randomly allocated toreceive: CPT-11, 200 mg/m² i.v. on day 1, followed on day 2 by LFA,250 mg/m² i.v. infusion and 5-FU, 850 mg/m² s i.v. bolus(arm A); TOM, 3 mg/m² i.v. on day 1, followed on day 2 by LFA, 250mg/m² i.v. infusion and 5-FU, 1050 mg/m² i.v. bolus (armB); or MTX, 750 mg/m² i.v. on day 1, followed on day 2 by LFA, 250mg/m² i.v. infusion and 5-FU, 800 mg/m² i.v. bolus (armC). Courses were repeated every two weeks in all arms of the trial. Responserate (RR) was evaluated after every four courses. The sample size was definedto have an 80% power to detect a 35% RR for each experimentaltreatment, and to show a difference of at least 4% in RR with thestandard treatment if the true difference is 15% or more. Results:The RRs were: 34% (95% confidence interval(95% CI): 21%–48%) in arm A, including 3 completeresponses (CRs) and 15 partial responses (PRs), 24% (95% CI:14%–38%) in arm B, including 2 CRs and 11 PRs, and24% (95% CI: 14%–38%), with 2 CRs and 11PRs, in arm C. After a median follow-up time of 62 (range 18–108) weeks,the median time to progression was 38, 25, and 27 weeks for arm A, B, and C,respectively. With 94 patients still alive, the one-year probability ofsurvival was 61%, 54%, and 59%, respectively. WHO grade3 or 4 neutropenia and diarrhoea affected 46% and 16%,respectively, of patients treated with CPT-11 + LFA–5-FU. Medianrelative dose intensity over eight cycles (DI₈) was 78% forCPT-11 and 82% for 5-FU. Severe toxicities of TOM + LFA–5-FU wereneutropenia (16%) and diarrhoea (16%), but median relativeDI₈ was 93% for TOM, and 82% for 5-FU. Conclusions:CPT-11 + LFA–5-FU compares favorably in termof activity and toxicity with other combination regimens including CPT-11 andcontinuous infusional 5-FU. The hypothesis of a RR 15% higher than theMTX + LFA–5-FU treatment can not be ruled out after this interimanalysis. The TOM + LFA–5-FU regimen showed a RR and a toxicity profilevery close to the MTX + LFA–5-FU combination, and dose not deservefurther evaluation in advanced colorectal cancer patients.     

Antitumour activity of three second-line treatment combinations in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer after optimal 5-FU regimen failure: a randomised, multicentre phase II study.

BACKGROUND: We have investigated the efficacy, safety and quality of life profiles of three therapeutic combinations [irinotecan + leucovorin (LV)/5-fluorouracil (5-FU), oxaliplatin + LV/5-FU and irinotecan +oxaliplatin] in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer after failure of a 5-FU-based regimen, or whose disease had progressed within 6 months of the end of treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred and one patients were randomised to receive either: (i) irinotecan 180 mg/m(2) on day 1 followed by an LV 200 mg/m(2) infusion, before a 5-FU 400 mg/m(2) bolus followed by a 5-FU 600 mg/m(2) infusion (LV5FU2 regimen), on days 1 and 2 every 2 weeks; (ii) oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2) on day 1 followed by the LV5FU2 regimen on days 1 and 2 every 2 weeks; or (iii) oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2) followed by irinotecan 200 mg/m(2), both on day 1 every 3 weeks. The primary end point was overall response rate (ORR). RESULTS: The intention-to-treat ORRs were 11.4% [95% confidence interval (CI) 3.2-26.7), 21.2% (95% CI 9.0-38.9) and 15.2% (95% CI 5.1-31.9), respectively, in the three arms. Tumour growth control was >or=60% for all three combinations and overall survivals were 12.2 months (95% CI 9.2-16.0), 11.5 months (95% CI 9.0-14.1) and 11.0 months (95% CI 8.1-12.2), respectively. All patients were evaluable for safety. Main grade 3-4 toxicity was neutropenia (33 to 39% of patients). CONCLUSIONS: Thus, second-line treatment with irinotecan/LV5FU2, oxaliplatin/LV5FU2 or irinotecan/oxaliplatin, provides good tumour growth control and survival coupled with an acceptable safety profile.     

Phase II study of tailored chemotherapy for advanced colorectal cancer with either 5-fluouracil and leucovorin or oxaliplatin and irinotecan based on the expression of thymidylate synthase and dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase.

BACKGROUND: Thymidylate synthase (TS) and dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) are essential enzymes for 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) metabolism. In patients with advanced colorectal cancer (ACRC), retrospective studies have shown that low expression levels of TS and DPD correlated with response to 5-FU. We performed a prospective study in which the choice of first-line chemotherapy with either 5-FU or a non-5-FU containing regimen was based on TS and DPD expression. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fresh-frozen samples of metastases were obtained from 58 previously untreated patients with ACRC. mRNA expression of TS and DPD was quantified using an RT-PCR assay. Patients with low tumor expression of both TS and DPD received weekly bolus 5-FU/leucovorin (LV) 500 mg/m2 (group A); patients with high TS and/or DPD received 3-weekly oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 and irinotecan 200 mg/m2 (group B). After progression, cross-over to the alternative regimen was attempted. RESULTS: Of 53 eligible patients, 31 had tumors with both low TS and low DPD, and were treated in group A. A response was observed in 11 patients [35%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 19% to 54%]. Cross-over to second-line oxaliplatin/irinotecan resulted in a partial response in two out of 16 patients (13%; 95% CI 1% to 38%). In group B, four out of 22 patients responded (18%; 95% CI 5% to 40%), while no responses were observed in 12 patients after cross-over to 5-FU/LV (0%; 95% CI 0% to 28%). CONCLUSIONS: Prospective selection of 5-FU/LV chemotherapy based on low TS and DPD expression in patients with ACRC did not confirm the high response rates reported in retrospective studies. The procedure of obtaining metastatic tissue and quantitation of enzymes appeared feasible but cumbersome. Before assessing the clinical utility of a predictive marker in a randomized trial, future studies should focus on prospective validation of the assay in a large and well defined population.     

Phase II trial of bimonthly leucovorin, 5-fluorouracil and gemcitabine for advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma (FOLFUGEM)

Background:Gemcitabine alone or 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) according to several schedules are used for palliation of metastatic and locally advanced (LA) pancreatic adenocarcinoma. This study was designed to test the efficacy of the leucovorin–5-FU and gemcitabine combination. Patients and methods:This phase II trial combined a simplified bimonthly LV5FU2 with gemcitabine: leucovorin 400 mg/m² in a two-hour infusion, followed by 5-fluorouracil 400 mg/m² bolus and 2 or 3 g/m² continuous infusion over 46 hours; gemcitabine 1 g/m² was infused over 30 min on day 3 after 5-FU. Treatment was repeated every two weeks. Gemcitabine dose could be increased (250 mg/m² every two cycles up to 1500 mg/m²) in the absence of NCI-CTC toxicity >2. Results:Among the 62 patients included in this study, 22 had LA and 40 had metastatic disease. Objective response rate for the 54 patients with measurable disease was 25.9% (95% confidence interval (CI): 14%–37.8%) and 22.6% (95% CI: 12%–33.2%) in the intent-to-treat population; the clinical benefit rate for the 59 assessable patients was 49.2%. Median progression-free survival and median overall survival were 4.8 and 9 months, respectively, with 32.3% of patients alive at 1 year. The most frequent toxicity (grade 3–4) was neutropenia (56.5%) usually asymptomatic (1.1% febrile neutropenia), but requiring decreases of 5-FU and gemcitabine doses. Unexpected complete alopecia occurred in 97% of patients. Conclusions:Palliative effects, response rate and survival observed in this multicenter study seem to be superior to those obtained with gemcitabine or 5-FU alone, despite a limiting hematological toxicity.     

Modulation of 5-fluorouracil with methotrexate and low-dose N-(phosphon-acetyl)-L-aspartate (PALA) is inactive in advanced pancreatic carcinoma

Purpose: To evaluate the effect of biochemical modulation by PALA and methotrexate on the therapeutic activity of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma.Patients and methods: The treatment protocol consisted of phosphonacetyl-L-aspartate (PALA) 250 mg/m² i.v. 15-minute infusion followed by methotrexate 200 mg/m² i.v. 30-minute infusion on day 1 and 5-FU 600 mg/m² i.v. push on day 2. Folinic acid was given at 15 mg/m² p.o. every six hours for eight doses, starting 24 hours after methotrexate infusion. Cycles were repeated every two weeks.Results: Thirty patients with advanced chemotherapy-naive pancreatic cancer were included; 26 had measurable disease. Median age 56 years (27–72); median PS 1 (0–2). One PR (3.9%) was achieved; nine patients had stable disease. Median time to progression was 91 days. Median survival was 177 days and one year survival was 13.3% (4 of 30 patients). Treatment was well tolerated; diarrhea WHO grade 2 or 3 occurred in six patients; stomatitis WHO grade 2 and 3 in nine patients.Conclusions: Modulation of 5-FU by PALA and MTX given in this dose and schedule appears to be ineffective in patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma.     

Paclitaxel in combination with weekly 24-hour infusional 5-fluorouracil plus leucovorin in the second-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer: Results of a phase II study

Purpose: To evaluate the antitumor activity in terms of response rate (RR), time to progression (TTP) and survival of paclitaxel in combination with weekly 24-hour infusional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/leucovorin in pretreated metastatic breast cancer (MBC).Patients and methods: Fifty-four patients with bidimensionally measureable disease were included during phase II. Thirty-two had anthracycline resistant disease. Treatment consisted of 5-FU (24-hour i.v. infusion) 2.0 g/m², leucovorin (two-hour i.v. infusion prior to 5-FU) 500 mg/m², weekly for six weeks (day 1, 8, 15, 22, 29, 36) and paclitaxel (three-hour i.v. infusion) 175 mg/m² was administered additionally on days 1 and 22, q 50 days.Results: We observed complete remissions in 4% of patients (2 of 54), partial remissions in 55% (30 of 54), stable disease in 37% (20 of 54) and progressive disease in 4% (2 of 54). The overall RR was 59% (95% CI 48%–72%). The RR in 32 patients with anthracycline resistant disease was 59% (19 of 32). The median duration of response was 12 months (3–22), median TTP eight months (2–22) and median survival time 15 months (2–28). Neutropenia was common, but of CTC grade 2 or 3 in most patients. Nonhematologic toxicities mostly consisted of CTC grade 1 and 2 myalgia, diarrhea, mucosits, nausea and vomiting.Conclusions: Paclitaxel combined with weekly 24-hour infusional 5-FU/leucovorin is well tolerated in the second line treatment of MBC. High efficacy was documented even in the treatment of anthracycline resistant disease, which warrants further evaluation.     

Short-time infusion of oxaliplatin in combination with capecitabine (XELOX30) as second-line therapy in patients with advanced colorectal cancer after failure to irinotecan and 5-fluorouracil.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of oxaliplatin combined with capecitabine (XELOX) as second-line therapy in patients with advanced colorectal cancer (ACRC) resistant to irinotecan is not well established. Oxaliplatin induces acute, cold-induced neuropathy in most patients. The incidence is claimed to be infusion rate-dependent and therefore a 2-h infusion is recommended. PATIENTS AND METHODS: For practical and economic reasons, but also for patient's convenience, we performed a phase II study to examine XELOX30 (capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 orally twice daily on days 1-14 and oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 as a 30 min infusion on day 1) in patients with ACRC resistant to irinotecan. In addition the pharmacokinetics of oxaliplatin was studied. RESULTS: From November 2002 to September 2003, 70 patients with ACRC were treated with XELOX30. Median age was 62 (range 33-74 years) years and median performance status was 1 (range 0-2). The median number of courses was four (range 1-12) and median cumulative dose of oxaliplatin was 530 (range 125-1560) mg/m2. The response rate was 17% (95% CI 10-23), median time to progression (TTP) was 5.4 months (95% CI 4.6-6.4) and median survival 9.5 months (95% CI 8.5-11.2). White blood cell count (WBC) and performance status were significantly correlated to TTP. Neurotoxicity was moderate: grade 1 56%, grade 2 17% and grade 3 6%. Other grade 3 toxicities were nausea/vomiting 9%, diarrhoea 14% and PPE 8%. The maximum blood concentration and total body clearance of oxaliplatin was higher than previously reported in studies examining 2-h infusions, but the volume of distribution and terminal half-life was in close agreement with previous results. CONCLUSION: XELOX30 is a very convenient second-line regimen in ACRC with an activity and safety profile similar to other oxaliplatin schedules.