HBV reactivation in patients with HCV/HBV cirrhosis on treatment with direct‐acting antivirals

Anecdotal reports suggest that patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) hepatitis and overt or occult hepatitis B virus (HBV) coinfection may reactivate HBV when HCV is suppressed or cleared by direct‐acting antivirals (DAAs). We assessed the prevalence of overt or previous HBV coinfection and the risk of HBV reactivation in patients with HCV cirrhosis treated with DAAs. This was a retrospective cohort of 104 consecutive patients with HCV cirrhosis treated with DAAs. Serum HCV‐RNA and HBV‐DNA were tested at weeks 4, 8 and 12 of DAAs therapy and at week 12 of follow‐up. At the start of DAAs, eight patients (7.7%) were HBsAg positive/HBeAg negative with undetectable HBV‐DNA and low levels of quantitative HBsAg (four on nucleos(t)ide analogues [NUCs] and four inactive carriers), 37 patients (35.6%) had markers of previous HBV infection (25 anti‐HBc positive, 12 anti‐HBc/anti‐HBs positive) and 59 (56.7%) had no evidence of HBV infection. Sixty‐seven patients (64.4%) were HCV‐RNA negative at week 4 and 98 (94.2%) achieved sustained virological response. All four HBsAg‐positive patients treated with NUCs remained HBV‐DNA negative, but three of four untreated patients showed an increase in HBV‐DNA of 2‐3 log without a biochemical flare and achieved HBV‐DNA suppression when given NUCs. During or after DAAs, by conventional assay, HBV‐DNA remained not detectable in all 37 anti‐HBc‐positive patients but in three of them (8.1%) HBV‐DNA became detectable with a highly sensitive PCR. HBV reactivation is likely to occur in untreated HBV/HCV‐coinfected cirrhotic patients when they undergo HCV treatment with DAAs. Pre‐emptive therapy with NUCs should be considered in this setting. Anti‐HBc‐positive patients rarely reactivate HBV without clinical or virological outcomes.     

Direct‐acting antivirals and hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation in co‐infected HBV/HCV kidney‐transplant recipients

Direct‐acting agents (DAAs) are highly efficient at treating hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections after kidney transplantation. Although drug agencies have recently warned of the risk of hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation after patients have received DAAs, reports have discrepant results in HBsAg‐positive and HBsAg‐negative patients. We report on 3 cases of HBV reactivation that were detected after achieving a DAA‐associated sustained virological response in 3 kidney‐transplant recipients initially HBsAg‐negative. In the first case, retrospective virological analysis revealed that HBsAgs had become positive and HBV DNA was detectable before initiating DAA therapy. In the second and third cases, HBV reactivation occurred 2 months and more than 1 year after stopping anti‐HCV therapy. These cases underline the discrepancies and highlight the need for comprehensive information before making definitive conclusions regarding the causal link between DAAs and HBV reactivation.     

Frequent delayed spontaneous seroclearance of hepatitis B virus after incident HBV infection among adult high‐risk groups

High rates (~25%) of developing chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection (hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)‐positive for > 6 months following infection) have been observed in people who use drugs (PWUD) and men who have sex with men (MSM). We aimed to estimate the frequency of delayed HBsAg seroclearance, along with its determinants, and time to delayed HBsAg seroclearance. Data were used from MSM and PWUD enrolled in the Amsterdam Cohort Studies (1985‐2002) who had anti‐hepatitis B core antibody seroconversion. Potential determinants for standard HBsAg seroclearance, delayed HBsAg seroclearance and chronic HBV were examined using multinominal logistic regression. Time to HBsAg seroclearance was estimated using Kaplan‐Meier curves. A total of 147 incident HBV infections occurred during follow‐up. On initial HBsAg testing after infection (6‐12 months), 42 (29%) were HBsAg‐positive and 105 (71%) were HBsAg‐negative (‘standard HBsAg seroclearance’). Of the 42 initially HBsAg‐positive individuals, 22 subsequently tested HBsAg‐negative (of whom 7 (31.8%) were HBV DNA positive at last visit, suggesting occult HBV). Overall, 15 became HBsAg‐negative and HBV DNA‐negative (‘delayed HBsAg seroclearance’), while 27 remained HBsAg and/or HBV DNA‐positive (‘chronic HBV’). The 5‐year cumulative probability of delayed HBsAg seroclearance was 41.6% for initially HBsAg‐positive individuals. Delayed HBsAg seroclearance and remaining chronically infected were associated with younger age and HIV/hepatitis C virus (HCV)‐co‐infection. In conclusion, delayed HBsAg seroclearance is common in these key adult populations at‐risk for HBV, while proportion developing HBV chronicity (18%) is still higher compared to the general population (~5%). Given the proportion of individuals with occult HBV infection and that HCV direct‐acting antivirals can lead to HBV reactivation, HBV DNA testing in HCV co‐infected MSM/PWUD are warranted prior to treatment initiation.     

Virological profiles in patients with chronic hepatitis C and overt or occult HBV infection

OBJECTIVES: The virological profiles of hepatitis B and C viruses (HBV and HCV) and their interplay in cases of coinfection are undefined. A suppressed and occult HBV infection may occur in hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) negative patients with chronic hepatitis C. The HCV core protein is able to inhibit HBV "in vitro," and serines at positions 99 and 116 are essential for such inhibition. We aimed to assess the HBV and HCV virological profiles in cases of coinfection and to evaluate the relationship between HCV core gene variability and HBV activity. METHODS: Eighty-two anti-HCV positive patients were examined: 35 cases were HBsAg positive, 24 were HBsAg negative with "occult" HBV infection, and 23 were HBV negative. HBV and HCV viremia levels were evaluated in all cases. HCV genomic region coding for the aminoacid sequence 99-116 of core protein was amplified and sequenced in all HCV RNA positive cases. The entire core gene was amplified and sequenced in three randomly selected cases. RESULTS: Serum HCV RNA was detected in all cases but 13, all HBsAg positive individuals; HCV viremia levels of the other 22 HBsAg positive subjects were similar to those detected in HBsAg negative patients with or without occult HBV infection. Among the 35 HBsAg positive patients both HBV DNA and HCV RNA were detected in five cases, HCV RNA alone in 17, and HBV DNA alone in six, whereas seven cases had undetectable levels of both viruses. Sequencing analyses showed that the HCV core gene was highly preserved in all patients. CONCLUSION: A wide spectrum of HCV and HBV virological patterns may occur in a case of coinfection. HCV core variability is not related to HBV activity "in vivo."     

Hepatitis delta virus propagation enabled by hepatitis C virus—Scientifically intriguing,but is it relevant to clinical practice?

In vitro cell culture experiments and animal models have demonstrated that hepatitis delta virus (HDV) can theoretically propagate being enveloped by human pathogenic viruses other than hepatitis B virus (HBV), namely hepatitis C virus (HCV) and dengue virus. However, the clinical relevance of these findings and whether HDV replication occurs in real‐world hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)–negative HCV patient cohorts remain unknown. To this aim, we analysed 323 HCV‐RNA–positive and HBsAg‐negative sera for the presence of HDV‐RNA and anti‐HDV antibodies (anti‐HDV). All 323 (100%) samples were negative for HDV‐RNA. Interestingly, 8/316 samples tested positive for anti‐HDV. The HBV serology of these eight patients showed a positive result for HBV core antibodies (anti‐HBc) indicating a seroconversion of an acute HBV infection in the past. None of the anti‐HBc–negative patients were positive for anti‐HDV. Our results indicate a distinctly low probability of replicative HDV infection in HCV mono‐infected patients in Germany. Current German clinical guidelines rightly recommend performing HDV screening only in HBsAg‐positive patients. However, larger studies on this subject should be performed in regions that are endemic for chronic HBV/HDV as well as HCV infections.     

Occult hepatitis B virus infection in HIV‐infected patients: Evaluation of biochemical,virological and molecular parameters

Aim: To determine the prevalence of occult hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection in a group of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)‐infected Brazilian patients and to investigate its association with biochemical, virological and molecular features. Methods: Sera from 43 patients positive for HBV core antibody and negative for HBV surface antigen (HBsAg) were tested for HBV DNA positivity by semi‐nested PCR. HBV loads were assessed by real‐time PCR. S gene was cloned and sequenced for HBV isolates from 3 patients. HBsAg expression of these cases was performed in HuH7 cells. Results: HBV DNA was found in 6/43 (14%) samples, all except one associated with low viral loads. Occult HBV infection was further correlated with anti‐hepatitis C virus (anti‐HCV) antibodies positivity, but not with alanine aminotransferase (ALT) elevated levels. S gene sequences derived from three patients were determined. Two of them displayed mutations that may explain HBsAg negativity. In the first one, a stop codon mutation was found at position 216 in the C‐terminal end of HBsAg. In the second patient, E164D and I195M substitutions in HBsAg, associated with lamivudine‐resistance mutations in the polymerase were identified. As expected, all clones showing those mutations displayed undetectable or very low levels of HBsAg. Conclusion: Occult HBV infection was frequent in HIV‐infected patients, was not associated with ALT elevation but significantly correlated with HCV seropositivity. The low viremia and the detection of HBsAg mutants confirm that multifactorial mechanisms are involved in occult HBV infection. HBV molecular monitoring should be employed for an adequate management of HBV/HIV co‐infected patients.     

A snapshot of virological presentation and outcome of immunosuppression‐driven HBV reactivation from real clinical practice: Evidence of a relevant risk of death and evolution from silent to chronic infection

The study was undertaken in order to provide a snapshot from real clinical practice of virological presentation and outcome of patients developing immunosuppression‐driven HBV reactivation. Seventy patients with HBV reactivation were included (66.2% treated with rituximab, 10% with corticosteroids and 23.8% with other immunosuppressive drugs). Following HBV reactivation, patients received anti‐HBV treatment for a median (IQR) follow‐up of 31(13‐47) months. At baseline‐screening, 72.9% of patients were HBsAg‐negative and 27.1% HBsAg‐positive. About 71.4% had a diagnosis of biochemical reactivation [median (IQR) HBV DNA and ALT: 6.9 (5.4‐7.8) log IU/mL and 359 (102‐775) U/L]. Moreover, 10% of patients died from hepatic failure. Antiviral prophylaxis was documented in 57.9% and 15.7% of HBsAg‐positive and HBsAg‐negative patients at baseline‐screening (median [IQR] prophylaxis duration: 24[15‐33] and 25[17‐36] months, respectively). Notably, HBV reactivation occurred 2‐24 months after completing the recommended course of anti‐HBV prophylaxis in 35.3% of patients. By analysing treatment outcome, the cumulative probability of ALT normalization and of virological suppression was 97% and 69%, respectively. Nevertheless, in patients negative to HBsAg at baseline‐screening, only 27% returned to HBsAg‐negative status during prolonged follow‐up, suggesting the establishment of chronic infection. In conclusion, most patients received a diagnosis of HBV reactivation accompanied by high ALT and 10% died for hepatic failure, supporting the importance of strict monitoring for an early HBV reactivation diagnosis. Furthermore, HBV reactivation correlates with high risk of HBV chronicity in patients negative for HBsAg at baseline‐screening, converting a silent into a chronic infection, requiring long‐term antiviral treatment. Finally, a relevant proportion of patients experienced HBV reactivation after completing the recommended course of anti‐HBV prophylaxis, suggesting the need to reconsider proper duration of prophylaxis particularly in profound immunosuppression.     

Prevalence of occult hepatitis B & C in HIV patients infected through sexual transmission.

BACKGROUND: Prevalence of Hepatitis B virus (HBV) and Hepatitis C virus (HCV) markers including active and occult infection has not been described in diverse cohorts among HIV-infected patients in India. Earlier studies have explained the role of HBV/HCV co-infection in cohorts of injection drug users (IDUs) but the sexual co-transmission of HBV/ HCV is not completely understood. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the prevalence of occult HBV & HCV infection in HIV positive sexually acquired transmission risk group. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 58 sexually acquired HIV positive patients were taken up for the study of occult HBV/HCV co-infection. Data on demographics, sexual behaviour, sexually transmitted diseases (STD), medical history, laboratory tests viz., serum ALT and CD4 count were recorded. HBV serology included HBsAg, anti HBs, IgG anti HBc and HBV DNA (PCR). HCV serology included anti HCV & HCV RNA (RT-PCR). RESULTS: Occult HBV infection (HBV DNA) was observed in 12.2% (7/58 with HBsAg -ve and IgG anti HBc +ve subjects) while an overall prevalence of HBV DNA was 13.7% (12% occult & 1.7% in HBsAg+ve patients). Out of 58 HIV positive patients 29.3% demonstrated reactivity for any marker of past or current HBV infection. (HBsAg 1.7%, anti HBs 10.3% anti HBc IgG 17.2%). 4/58 (6.8%) revealed anti HCV positivity along with HCV RNA positivity by RT-PCR while 6/58 (10.3%) individuals revealed an occult HCV infection (anti HCV negative). The overall HCV RNA prevalence was 17.2%. 2 out of 58 (3.4%) individuals were positive for occult infection of both HBV DNA & HCV RNA (Triple infection HIV/HBV/ HCV). The HBV/HCV co-infected group (n = 18) showed a significantly high ALT (114.3 + 12.3 U/I) & low CD4 count (202.5 + 33.7 cells/mm3). The percent prevalence of HBV/ HCV co-infection was higher in the illiterate group, in men less than 30 years of age, and in those who were married and exhibited polygamous activity. CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrated that in HIV infected patients testing only serological viral markers like HBsAg, antiHBcIgG & anti HCV, fails to identify the true prevalence of co-infection with HBV & HCV. Qualitative PCR for HBV DNA & HCV RNA detects co-infection in patients who are negative for serological markers. Also, in subjects who had only a sexual risk factor for parenterally transmitted infections, HIV may enhance the sexual transmission of HBV and HCV.     

Acquirement and disappearance of HBsAg and anti‐HCV in an aged population: a follow‐up study in an endemic township

Background: HBsAg and anti‐hepatitis C virus (anti‐HCV) are stable markers and widely used. The seroconversion and seroclearance of HBsAg and anti‐HCV are important for disease control and prognosis of diseases. Aims: To investigate acquirement and disappearance of HBsAg and anti‐HCV in an endemic area. Methods: Seven years after a community screening, 1002 of 2909 residents of Tzukuan Township were recruited. HBsAg, anti‐HCV and alanine transaminase (ALT) were checked in all who participated and hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA, anti‐HBs, anti‐HBc, HCV RNA, anti‐HDV and upper abdominal ultrasonography were studied in different groups. Results: There were 461 male and 541 female residents with a mean age of 66.7±8.6 years. No new HBsAg carrier was noted and the HBsAg clearance rate was 1.58% per year. One of the 17 cases with HBsAg clearance had positive HBV DNA, three had ALT elevation, two had cirrhosis and seven had anti‐HBs seroconversion. Quantitative of HBsAg and HBV DNA were concordant and 78.1% subjects had low levels of titration. Anti‐HBc alone contributed to 32.1% and was prominent in old age and the anti‐HCV‐positive group. The anti‐HCV seroconversion rate was only 0.74% per year and household transmission was the only risk factor. Only 37.5% of cases with anti‐HCV seroconversion had HCV viraemia and the anti‐HCV seroreversion rate was 0.63% per year. The anti‐HDV seroconversion rate was 0.72% per year and no subject showed anti‐HDV clearance. Conclusions: Much higher rates of HBsAg seroclearance, anti‐HCV seroreversion and anti‐HBc alone were noted in this endemic area and no subject showed anti‐HDV clearance.     

Low incidence of hepatitis B virus reactivation and subsequent hepatitis in patients with chronic hepatitis C receiving direct‐acting antiviral therapy

To determine the clinical characteristics of hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation in patients undergoing interferon‐free antihepatitis C virus (HCV) therapy, we examined HBV DNA in 25 HBV co‐infected patients and 765 patients with resolved HBV infection during and after treatment with direct‐acting antiviral agents (DAAs). Among those with HCV genotype 1, asunaprevir plus daclatasvir was administered to 160 patients, sofosbuvir (SOF) plus ledipasvir to 438 patients and paritaprevir plus ombitasvir and ritonavir to 25 patients. In total, 167 patients with genotype 2 were treated with SOF plus ribavirin. Three patients with an HBV DNA level ≥2000 IU/mL were treated with entecavir before anti‐HCV therapy, without reactivation of HBV. In 3 of 22 (12%) HBV surface antigen (HBsAg)‐positive patients with an HBV DNA level <2000 IU/mL, the viral load increased during treatment. However, hepatitis flare did not occur in these patients. There was no significant difference in clinical history between patients with and without HBV reactivation. Among 765 patients with resolved HBV infection, HBV reactivation occurred in 1 (0.1%) patient after initial resolution, whose HBV DNA level spontaneously decreased after DAA therapy. We compared anti‐HBs titres at baseline with those at post‐DAA therapy in 123 patients without HBsAg. There was no significant difference in anti‐HBs levels between the two points (P = .79). In conclusion, HBV reactivation was rare in HBsAg‐negative patients treated with DAA therapy. Additionally, hepatitis did not occur in HBV‐reactivated patients with a baseline HBV DNA level <2000 IU/mL before DAA therapy.     

Clinical and virological factors associated with hepatitis B virus reactivation in HBsAg‐negative and anti‐HBc antibodies‐positive patients undergoing chemotherapy and/or autologous stem cell transplantation for cancer

Summary. We studied clinical outcome and clinico‐virological factors associated with hepatitis B virus reactivation (HBV‐R) following cancer treatment in hepatitis B virus surface antigen (HBsAg)‐negative/anti‐hepatitis B core antibodies (anti‐HBcAb)‐positive patients. Between 11/2003 and 12/2005, HBV‐R occurred in 7/84 HBsAg‐negative/anti‐HBcAb‐positive patients treated for haematological or solid cancer. Virological factors including HBV genotype, core promoter, precore, and HBsAg genotypic and amino acid (aa) patterns were studied. Patients presenting with reactivation were men, had an hepatitis B virus surface antibody (HBsAb) titre <100 IU/L and underwent >1 line of chemotherapy (CT) significantly more frequently than controls. All were treated for haematological cancer, 3/7 received haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), and 4/7 received rituximab. Using multivariate analysis, receiving >1 line of CT was an independent risk factor for HBV‐R. Fatal outcome occurred in 3/7 patients (despite lamivudine therapy in two), whereas 2/4 survivors had an HBsAg seroconversion. HBV‐R involved non‐A HBV genotypes and core promoter and/or precore HBV mutants in all cases. Mutations known to impair HBsAg antigenicity were detected in HBV DNA from all seven patients. HBV DNA could be retrospectively detected in two patients prior cancer treatment and despite HBsAg negativity. HBV‐R is a concern in HBsAg‐negative/anti‐HBcAb‐positive patients undergoing cancer therapy, especially in males presenting with haematological cancer, a low anti‐HBsAb titre and more than one chemotherapeutic agent. HBV DNA testing is mandatory to improve diagnosis and management of HBV‐R in these patients. The role of specific therapies such as rituximab or HSCT as well as of HBV aa variability deserves further studies.     

Previous hepatitis B virus infection is associated with worse disease stage and occult hepatitis B virus infection has low prevalence and pathogenicity in hepatitis C virus‐positive patients

Abstract: Background: Anti‐hepatitis C virus (anti‐HCV) patients with chronic liver disease (CLD) frequently show markers of previous hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. Moreover, they may carry occult HBV infection. These features might influence clinical and biochemical features as well as stage of disease. Aim: To assess the prevalence and clinical associations of previous (positivity for anti‐HBs and/or anti‐HBc antibodies) and occult HBV infection (positivity for HBV‐DNA by nested‐PCR) in the serum of anti‐HCV‐positive, HCV‐RNA‐positive, HBsAg‐negative patients with various degrees of CLD seen at a tertiary referral centre. Patients: A total of 119 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria (84 chronic hepatitis and 35 liver cirrhosis). Results: Forty‐eight patients (40.3%) showed markers of previous HBV infection. This feature was more frequent (P = 0.02) among cirrhotics (57%) as compared to chronic hepatitis patients (33%). Chronic hepatitis patients positive for markers of previous HBV infection had worse histology as compared to negative ones (grading: 6.4 ± 2.7 versus 4.6 ± 3.0, P = 0.004; staging: 1.6 ± 1.2 versus 1.0 ± 1.0, P = 0.01). Eight patients were positive for HBV‐DNA in serum (6.7%). No difference in the presence of occult HBV infection was seen between various degrees of liver disease (7.1% of chronic hepatitis, 5.7% of cirrhosis) and among patients who were positive (10.4%) or negative (4.2%) for markers of previous HBV infection. No significant biochemical, virological, or histological difference was observed between age, age at infection, duration of infection, marker patterns of previous HBV infection‐matched HBV‐DNA‐positive and negative chronic hepatitis patients. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that previous HBV infection among anti‐HCV patients is associated with worse disease stage. In these patients, the prevalence of occult HBV infection is low and there is no difference in distribution among patients with or without markers of previous HBV infection. Furthermore, it does not seem to be associated with disease stage. Lastly, at least among patients with chronic hepatitis, it does not seem to affect the severity of disease.     

Relapse rates in chronic hepatitis B naïve patients after discontinuation of antiviral therapy with entecavir

Registration studies show entecavir (ETV) to be effective and safe in NUC‐naïve patients with chronic hepatitis B, but relapse rates after treatment discontinuation have not been well established. Relapse rates and predictors of relapse were evaluated in naïve HBeAg‐positive and HBeAg‐negative patients treated with ETV. Treatment duration was defined according to international guidelines. Virological relapse was defined as reappearance in serum of hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA to >2000 IU/mL after discontinuation of treatment. A hundred and sixty‐nine consecutive patients were treated for a median 181 weeks. 61% were HBeAg positive, 23% had cirrhosis, and mean HBV DNA level was 6.88 ± 1.74 log₁₀ IU/mL. Ninety‐two per cent became HBV DNA negative; 71% of HBeAg+ve patients became HBeAg negative and 68% anti‐HBe positive; 14% became HBsAg negative and 13% anti‐HBs positive. At the end of the study, 36 patients discontinued treatment: one due to breakthrough associated with resistant variants and 35 (20%) due to sustained virological response; 33 of these patients developed HBeAg seroconversion and 18 HBsAg seroconversion. Median off‐treatment time was 69 weeks. Nine patients (26%), all HBeAg positive at baseline, developed virological relapse after a median 48 weeks off‐treatment, 3 of them showed HBeAg reversion and 4 lost anti‐HBe. No patient with HBsAg seroconversion relapsed. HBeAg clearance after week 48 of treatment was associated with an increase risk of relapse. After ETV discontinuation, HBsAg seroconversion was maintained in 100% of the patients, HBeAg seroconversion maintained in 90%, and virological relapse rate was 24%.     

Factors associated with isolated anti‐hepatitis B core antibody in HIV‐positive patients: impact of compromised immunity

Summary. In regions that are hyperendemic for chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, prevalence of and risk factors associated with isolated anti‐hepatitis B core antibody (anti‐HBc) in HIV‐positive patients are less well described. HIV‐positive patients who were tested for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), anti‐hepatitis B surface antibody (anti‐HBs) and anti‐HBc at designated hospitals for HIV care in Taiwan were included for analysis. HBV DNA was detected by real‐time polymerase chain reaction in patients with and without isolated anti‐HBc. Of 2351 HIV‐positive patients, 450 (19.1%) were HBsAg positive, 411 (17.5%) were anti‐HBc positive alone and 963 (41.0%) for both anti‐HBs and anti‐HBc. Compared with patients who were positive for both anti‐HBs and anti‐HBc, patients with isolated anti‐HBc were older, less likely to have anti‐hepatitis C virus antibody (anti‐HCV), had lower CD4 lymphocyte counts and higher plasma HIV RNA loads. Older age (adjusted odds ratio, 1.029; 95% confidence interval, 1.015–1.043) and CD4 <100 cells/μL (adjusted odds ratio, 1.524; 95% confidence interval, 1.025–2.265) were independently associated with isolated anti‐HBc by logistic regression, while presence of anti‐HCV and injecting drug use were not. HBV DNA was detectable in 8.3% of 277 patients with isolated anti‐HBc and 14.3% of 56 patients with both anti‐HBs and anti‐HBc (P = 0.160). In a country hyperendemic for HBV infection, HIV‐positive patients at older age and with CD4 <100 cells/μL were more likely to have isolated anti‐HBc, suggesting that compromised immunity plays a role in the presence of this marker.     

Baseline and kinetics of serum hepatitis B virus RNA predict response to pegylated interferon‐based therapy in patients with hepatitis B e antigen‐negative chronic hepatitis B

Serum hepatitis B virus (HBV) RNA has emerged as a novel biomarker of treatment response. This study aimed to investigate the role of this marker in predicting long‐term outcome of patients with hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)‐negative chronic hepatitis B (CHB) receiving pegylated interferon (PEG‐IFN)‐based therapy. Serial serum samples from 91 patients with HBeAg‐negative CHB previously treated with PEG‐IFN alone or combined with entecavir in a randomized trial were retrospectively analysed. HBV RNA quantification was examined by droplet digital PCR. At the end of 3 years post‐treatment follow‐up, maintained virological response (MVR, HBV DNA < 2000 IU/mL), and hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) clearance were achieved in 37.4% (34/91) and 7.7% (7/91), respectively. Baseline serum HBV RNA concentrations correlated with HBV DNA and covalently closed circular DNA but did not correlate with HBsAg levels. Multiple regression analysis showed that pre‐treatment HBV RNA and HBsAg were independently associated with MVR and HBsAg clearance. Baseline HBV RNA (cut‐off 2.0 log₁₀ copies/mL) had a positive predictive value (PPV) and a negative predictive value in predicting MVR of 80.8% and 80.0%, respectively. At the same cut‐off value, PPV and NPV for predicting HBsAg clearance were 30.8% and 95.4%, respectively. At week 12 during therapy, HBV RNA level ≥ 2 log₁₀ copies/mL displayed high NPVs of achieving MVR and HBsAg clearance (95% and 100%, respectively). In conclusion, the measurement of HBV RNA prior to PEG‐IFN‐based therapy could identify patients with high probability of MVR. In addition, HBV RNA kinetics may serve as a promising “stopping rule” in patients infected with HBV genotypes B or C.     

A new method of concentrating hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA and HBV surface antigen: an application of the method to the detection of occult HBV infection

Background The risk of post‐transfusion hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection has been reduced after the implementation of HBV nucleic acid amplification technology (NAT). However, the problem of HBV DNA‐positive and HBV surface antigen (HBsAg)‐negative occult HBV infections remains to be solved. This is in part due to the HBV DNA load being too low to detect these occult HBV infections using mini‐pool NAT. In Japan, the assay for the antibody against the HBV core antigen (anti‐HBc) has not completely excluded occult HBV infection. To solve this problem, we have developed a new method of concentrating HBV DNA and HBsAg simultaneously to increase the sensitivity of detection tests. Methods Virus concentration is achieved by the enhancement of the agglutination of viruses using poly‐L‐lysine in the presence of a bivalent metal. Poly‐L‐lysine‐coated magnetic beads are used to shorten the time of each step of the concentration procedure. Seventy‐seven anti‐HBc‐positive and HBsAg‐negative donations were examined. HBsAg and anti‐HBc were tested by enzyme immunoassay (EIA) (AxSYM; Abbott) and haemagglutination inhibition test (Japanese Red Cross), respectively. Results HBV surface antigen and HBV DNA levels were concentrated up to four‐ to sevenfold. Using this method, 35 of the 77 anti‐HBc‐positive and HBsAg‐negative donors were HBV DNA‐positive by individual NAT and a further five donors became HBV DNA‐positive by HBV concentration. Twenty‐seven of 40 occult HBV infections became HBsAg‐positive by HBsAg concentration. Conclusion Our new method of concentrating HBV and HBsAg increased the sensitivities of EIA and HBV NAT, and enabled us to detect 27 of 40 occult HBV infections by HBsAg EIA.     

T‐ and B‐cell responses and previous exposure to hepatitis B virus in ‘anti‐HBc alone’ patients

A serologic response to hepatitis B virus (HBV) defined as ‘anti‐HBc alone’ is commonly observed, but its significance remains unclear. This study aimed to define the relationship between ‘anti‐HBc alone’ serostatus and HBV infection, including HBV‐specific T‐ and B‐cell memory responses. We enrolled 31 ‘anti‐HBc alone’ patients. Total HBV DNA and cccDNA were tested by nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis in liver samples from 22 ‘anti‐HBc alone’ patients vs controls (chronic or resolved HBV infection), followed by HBsAg/HBcAg immunohistochemical (IHC) staining. IFN‐γ secretion by HBV‐specific T cells was compared in individuals who were ‘anti‐HBc alone’ (n = 27), resolved HBV (n = 21), chronic HBV (n = 24) and 12 healthy controls using enzyme‐linked immunospot (ELISpot) assays. An HBsAg‐IgG B‐cell ELISpot assay was performed in ‘anti‐HBc alone’ patients before and after one dose of recombinant HBsAg vaccine. The majority (23/31, 74.2%) of the ‘anti‐HBc alone’ individuals were co‐infected with HCV. Infrequent intrahepatic total HBV DNA (2/22, 9.1%) and cccDNA (1/22, 4.5%) were detected in biopsies; HBsAg and HBcAg IHC staining was negative. HBV‐specific T‐cell responses were similar between ‘anti‐HBc alone’ individuals and HBV resolvers. Circulating HBV‐memory B‐cell responses were detected in all ‘anti‐HBc alone’ individuals, consistent with an HBsAg‐specific memory pool. After one HBV vaccine dose, increased anti‐HBs antibody levels were observed, accompanied by an expansion of HBsAg‐specific memory B cells (P = 0.0226). ‘Anti‐HBc alone’ individuals showed HBV‐specific T‐cell and memory B‐cell responses typical of previous viral exposure and protective memory, suggesting a resolved infection.     

Persistent and transient hepatitis B virus (HBV) infections in children born to HBV‐infected mothers despite active and passive vaccination

Summary. Combined passive and active immunization for newborns very effectively prevents perinatal hepatitis B virus (HBV) infections. In the Netherlands, babies born to hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)‐positive women receive passive immunization with hepatitis B and at least three active HBsAg vaccinations. Serological testing for the presence of HBV markers was offered for all infants born to HBsAg‐positive mothers between January 2003 and July 2007, after completion of their vaccination schedule. About 75% of the infants (n = 1743) completed their HB‐vaccination schedule and participated in the serologic evaluation. Twelve of them (0.7%) were found to be HBV infected. Furthermore, we identified three older children with high levels of anti‐HBc, anti‐HBs and anti‐HBe, while they were HBsAg and HBV DNA negative. This serologic profile is evidence for a resolved HBV infection. In the group of older children (1.5–5 years of age, n = 728), about half of the HBV‐infected children (3 of 7) had already cleared their infection at the time of sampling. For a proper evaluation of the efficacy of a new intervention programme to prevent vertical HBV transmission, it is also important to analyse the HBV markers in serum collected when the children are older than 1.5 years. In a programmatic setting, all children born to HBV‐infected mothers should be tested not only for the level of anti‐HBs but also for the absence of HBsAg, because 2 of the 12 HBV‐infected children (17%) had a high level of anti‐HBs.     

Long‐term observation on hepatitis B surface antigen seroclearance in therapy experienced HIV/HBV co‐infected Chinese

The aim of this retrospective study was to observe hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) seroclearance and explore predictors of HBsAg loss in HIV/HBV‐co‐infected patients receiving long‐term lamivudine or both tenofovir and lamivudine containing therapies. Quantification of HBsAg, hepatitis B e antigen and HBV DNA before and after initiation of HBV‐active antiretroviral therapy in a total of 268 HIV/HBV‐co‐infected patients started treatment between 2005 and 2017 were performed. Over a median of 65.63 months of follow‐up, 10 (3.7%) were observed HBsAg loss and the quantification of HBsAg in 7 (2.6%) patients were less than 50 IU/mL. With the prolongation of antiretroviral therapy duration time, the rates of HBsAg seroclearance tended to increase gradually, rising from 1.8% (3/163) during 2‐4 years treatment to 29.4% (10/34) after antiretroviral therapy for up to 10 years. Lower baseline qHBsAg and HBV DNA levels and strong 12‐month declines in qHBsAg were significantly associated with HBsAg seroclearance. The event of HBsAg seroclearance is uncommon among Chinese individuals with HIV/HBV co‐infection who have been treated with anti‐HBV containing antiretroviral therapy, and lifelong therapy for HBV is needed for HIV/HBV co‐infected patients. Baseline qHBsAg and HBV DNA levels and qHBsAg decline rate were predictors for HBsAg seroclearance.