Multichannel intraluminal impedance monitoring in the evaluation of patients with non-obstructive Dysphagia

BACKGROUND: Non-obstructive dysphagia (NOD) often poses diagnostic problems. The aim of this study was to evaluate the value of the addition of multichannel intraluminal impedance (MII) recording to esophageal manometry in the work-up of patients with NOD. METHODS: A total of 40 consecutive patients with NOD underwent combined esophageal MII recording and perfusion manometry. Ten liquid and 10 viscous boluses were tested in each patient. Values for bolus presence time (BPT) at each of the four recording sites and total bolus transit time (TBTT) were calculated. Bolus transit (BT) was considered to be normal when BPT at all sites and TBTT were within the normal limits defined in 42 healthy subjects. Patients were judged to have normal transit if >or=80% of liquid and >or=70% of viscous swallows showed normal transit. RESULTS: The following manometric diagnoses were made: normal motility (20), ineffective esophageal motility (IEM) (13), diffuse esophageal spasm (DES) (4), and achalasia (3). Abnormal transit for liquid and/or viscous boluses was found in 35.3% of patients with normal motility, in 66.7% of DES patients, and in 100% of achalasia patients. In patients with achalasia quantification of BT was often made impossible by low initial impedance baseline. Two IEM patients (15.4%) showed normal liquid and viscous transit. Swallows showing normal transit had significantly longer duration of LES relaxation in patients with normal manometry and IEM (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: MII recording identifies esophageal function abnormalities in NOD patients with normal manometry, IEM, and DES. The MII technique seems to be less suitable for the most severe end of the dysphagia spectrum like achalasia.     

Symptom and function heterogenicity among patients with distal esophageal spasm: studies using combined impedance-manometry

BACKGROUND: Combined multichannel intraluminal impedance and esophageal manometry (MII-EM) is a clinically available tool that assesses the functional defect of various manometric abnormalities. The aim of our study was to evaluate esophageal bolus transit in patients with manometrically defined distal esophageal spasm (DES). METHODS: Patients referred for esophageal function testing underwent combined MII-EM studies including 10 liquid and 10 viscous swallows. Individual swallows were classified using previously published manometric and impedance criteria. DES is traditionally defined as > or =20% simultaneous contractions in the distal esophagus. Diagnosis of esophageal transit abnormalities was defined by the presence of > or =30% incomplete liquid or > or =40% incomplete viscous swallows. RESULTS: Data from 71 patients (43 female, mean age 57 yr, range 16-85) with a manometric diagnosis of DES were analyzed. During liquid swallows, patients with chest pain had higher (p < 0.05) distal esophageal amplitudes (202.3 +/- 34.5 mmHg) and a higher (p < 0.05) percentage of swallows with complete bolus transit (89%+/- 3%) compared to patients presenting with dysphagia (amplitude 117.8 +/- 8.7 mmHg; percentage of complete transit 69%+/- 5%) and patients with reflux symptoms (amplitude 116.4 +/- 12.7 mmHg; percentage of complete transit 74%+/- 5%). Fifty-one percent of the DES patients had a normal bolus transit for liquid and viscous, 24% abnormal bolus transit for one substance, and 25% abnormal bolus transit for liquid and viscous. CONCLUSION: Pressure and bolus transit information in patients with manometrically defined DES points toward heterogenicity of this group of patients. Outcomes data are warranted to evaluate whether stratifying DES patients based on pressure and bolus transit information may improve the clinical approach.     

Regional Esophageal Dysfunction in Scleroderma and Achalasia using Multichannel Intraluminal Impedance and Manometry

Background Achalasia and scleroderma are esophageal motility abnormalities characterized by severely impaired bolus transit. Combined multichannel intraluminal impedance and manometry (MII-EM) enables the simultaneous measurement of intraesophageal pressures and bolus transit at various levels within the esophagus. Aim The aim of the study was to evaluate and characterize regional pressure and transit profile differences in scleroderma and achalasia patients. Methods A retrospective analysis was carried out of MII-EM studies of patients with scleroderma (15), achalasia (20), and poorly relaxing lower esophageal sphincter (LES) with normal esophageal body function (20) as a control group. Bolus presence and segmental transit were evaluated by MII. Results In patients with achalasia, bolus transit was impaired across all four sites compared with scleroderma (P < 0.0125) even though distal esophageal pressures were higher (P < 0.05) in patients with achalasia. Pressures in patients with achalasia were similar across all four sites (ANOVA; saline, P = 0.373; viscous, P = 0.615). Bolus clearance rates and contraction amplitudes in patients with scleroderma decreased from proximal to distal. In the control group, bolus clearance was complete during ≥83% of all swallows and esophageal pressure amplitudes increased distally. Conclusion While the overall bolus transit is impaired in both patients with achalasia and scleroderma regional pressure and bolus transit differences exist. Bolus transit abnormalities result from abnormal esophageal body contraction and not abnormal LES relaxation.     

Evaluation of esophageal function in patients with esophageal motor abnormalities using multichannel intraluminal impedance esophageal manometry

INTRODUCTION Esophageal manometry has been considered the “gold standard” test for the evaluation of esophageal motility. Esophageal manometry allows physicians to assess peri- stalsis by using informations about the shape, amplitude and duration of the…     

Impedance detected abnormal bolus transit in patients with normal esophageal manometry. Sensitive indicator of esophageal functional abnormality?

SUMMARY. When used in combination with manometry, multichannel intraluminal impedance better characterizes the established manometric abnormalities into those with and without associated transit defects. However, the significance of the finding of normal manometry and abnormal impedance is not known. The objective of this study is to evaluate the clinical relevance of abnormal impedance associated with normal manometry during esophageal function testing in patients with a variety of esophageal symptoms. All patients referred for esophageal function testing during a 27‐month period underwent combined multichannel intraluminal impedance and esophageal manometry studies including 10 liquid and 10 viscous swallows in supine position. From 576 patients with normal esophageal body manometry we identified 158 patients (27%) with abnormal impedance. The primary symptom in these 158 patients was compared to that in 146 consecutive patients with normal manometry and normal impedance selected from the original 576 patients. Abnormal bolus transit was found with viscous, liquid and both type swallows in 60%, 19% and 21% of the patients respectively. Of patients with abnormal bolus transit, 23% presented with dysphagia compared to 10% of normal transit patients (p = 0.0035). In conclusion, abnormal impedance even in patients with normal manometry may be a sensitive indicator of esophageal functional abnormality as represented by the symptom of dysphagia in these patients. Abnormal transit was more frequently identified with viscous than liquid swallows. Prospective studies to further clarify impedance detected transit defects in patients with normal manometry and the role of viscous swallows in diagnostic testing are warranted.     

Impedance nadir values correlate with barium bolus amount

We examined the value of impedance monitoring in measuring bolus volume compared with videoesophagram. Eighty consecutive subjects were studied with simultaneous impedance‐manometry‐videoesophagram. A catheter with both an impedance electrode pair and a pressure transducer at four sites (5, 10, 15, 20 cm above lower esophageal sphincter) was passed per nares. Six 10‐cc boluses of 45% barium mixed with 0.9% NaCl were swallowed at 20‐ to 30‐second intervals. When impedance fell to below 1000 ohms, other than that occurring during administered swallows, the videofluoroscopic image corresponding to the time of impedance nadir was reviewed. If barium was present at the impedance site, barium area was calculated. The video was reviewed for the cause of abnormal barium transit causing barium presence. We found 38/80 subjects had a total of 169 impedance falls to below 1000 ohms. Ninety‐seven percent (164/169) of impedance falls had barium present at the impedance site, and there was good correlation (r = 0.83, P < 0.001) between impedance nadir value and barium area. The impedance nadir value : barium area relationship was similar for the three causes of barium presence identified by video: failed bolus clearing; gastroesophageal reflux; and esophageal escape. Impedance nadir values 700–999 ohms usually had a small barium area. In contrast, nadir values <400 ohms had a large barium area covering all or most of the catheter and filling the esophagus at the impedance site. Impedance falls from >1000 ohms to a low nadir value from all forms of abnormal esophageal bolus transit imply a large bolus amount.     

Combined multichannel intraluminal impedance and manometry clarifies esophageal function abnormalities: study in 350 patients

BACKGROUND: Combined multichannel intraluminal impedance and esophageal manometry (MII-EM) is a technique that uses an FDA-approved device allowing simultaneous evaluation of bolus transit (MII) in relation to pressure changes (EM). METHODS: During a 9-month period, beginning from July 2002 through March 2003, we prospectively performed combined MII-EM on all patients referred for esophageal function testing. Each patient received 10 liquid and 10 viscous swallows. Manometric findings were reported based on criteria described by Spechler and Castell for liquid swallows. MII findings were reported as having normal bolus transit if >/=80% (8/10) of liquid and >/=70% (7/10) of viscous swallows had complete bolus transit. RESULTS: Three-hundred fifty studies were evaluated from patients with a variety of symptoms having the following manometric diagnoses: normal manometry (125), achalasia (24), scleroderma (4), ineffective esophageal motility (IEM) (71), distal esophageal spasm (DES) (33), nutcracker esophagus (30), hypertensive lower esophageal sphincter (LES) (25), hypotensive LES (5), and poorly relaxing LES (33). None of the patients with achalasia and scleroderma had normal bolus transit. Fifty-one percent of patients with IEM and 55% of patients with DES had normal bolus transit while almost all (more than 95%) patients with normal esophageal manometry, nutcracker esophagus, poorly relaxing LES, hypertensive LES, and hypotensive LES had normal bolus transit. Dysphagia occurred most often in patients with incomplete bolus transit on MII testing. CONCLUSION: Esophageal body pressures primarily determine bolus transit with isolated LES abnormalities appearing to have little effect on esophageal function. MII clarifies functional abnormalities in patients with abnormal manometric studies.     

Esophageal solid bolus transit: studies using combined multichannel intraluminal impedance and manometry in healthy volunteers

The purpose of this study is to apply combined multichannel intraluminal impedance and esophageal manometry (MII‐EM) to test esophageal function during solid swallowing in a normal healthy population. We determined whether combined MII‐EM with solid bolus is more sensitive than that with viscous bolus in the detection of motility abnormality. Eighteen healthy volunteers (11 men and 7 women; mean age 22 years, range 20–26 years) underwent combined MII‐EM with a catheter containing four impedance‐measuring segments and five solid‐state pressure transducers. Each subject received 10 viscous and 10 solid materials. Tracings were analyzed manually for bolus presence time, total bolus transit time, contraction amplitude, duration, and onset velocity. Three hundred and sixty swallows including viscous and solid materials were analyzed. Contraction amplitude for the viscous swallows was higher at 20 cm above the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) (P= 0.049) but lower at 15 cm above the LES (P < 0.001). Duration of contractions for the solid swallows was longer at 15 cm (P= 0.002) and 10 cm above the LES (P= 0.011) compared with viscous swallows. The total bolus transit time for solid was significantly shorter than that for viscous boluses (6.8 vs. 7.7 seconds, P < 0.001). Bolus presence time appeared to be similar between viscous and solid boluses (except in the proximal esophagus). The percentage of swallows with ineffective peristalsis by manometry, as well as those with incomplete bolus transit by impedance, did not differ between viscous and solid swallows. The proportion of manometrically ineffective solid swallows with incomplete bolus transit was greater than that of viscous swallows (62.1% vs. 34.8%, P= 0.05). Application of solid boluses may potentially enhance diagnostic capability of esophageal function testing. Solid boluses can be regarded as a valuable complement to viscous boluses in the detection of esophageal motility abnormalities when applied with combined MII‐EM.     

Specific esophagogram to assess functional outcomes after Heller's myotomy and Dor's fundoplication for esophageal achalasia

Esophageal emptying assessed at the ‘timed barium’ esophagogram correlates well with symptomatic outcomes after pneumatic dilation for esophageal achalasia, although 30% of patients with satisfactory outcome exhibit partial improvement in emptying. The aim of the study was to investigate any correlation of esophageal emptying to symptomatic response after laparoscopic Heller's myotomy and Dor's fundoplication. ‘Bread and barium’ (transit time of a barium opaque bread bolus) and ‘timed barium’ (height of esophageal barium column 5 minutes after ingestion of 200–250 mL of barium suspension) esophagogram was used to assess esophageal emptying in 73 patients with esophageal achalasia before 1 and 5 years (31 cases) after laparoscopic myotomy and anterior fundoplication. Symptoms assessment was based to a specific score. At 1‐year follow‐up, excellent and good symptomatic results were obtained in 95% of the cases. Esophageal maximum diameter, esophageal transit time, and esophageal barium column were significantly correlated to each other and to symptom score postoperatively (P < 0.001). Complete and partial (<90% and 50–90% postoperative reduction in barium column, respectively) emptying was seen in 55% and 31% of patients with excellent result. Patients with a pseudodiverticulum postoperatively had a more delayed esophageal emptying than those without. Symptomatic outcome and esophageal emptying did not deteriorate at 5‐year follow‐up. Esophageal emptying assessed by ‘barium and bread’ and ‘timed barium’ esophagogram correlated well with symptomatic outcome after laparoscopic myotomy for esophageal achalasia. Complete symptomatic relief does not necessarily reflect complete esophageal emptying. Outcomes do not deteriorate by time. Because of wide availability, esophagogram can be applied in follow‐up of postmyotomy patients in conjunction with symptomatic evaluation.     

Esophageal function testing with combined multichannel intraluminal impedance and manometry: multicenter study in healthy volunteers.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Combined multichannel intraluminal impedance and manometry (MII-EM) assesses esophageal function by simultaneous measurement of both pressure and bolus transit. Normative data for this method have not been published. The aim of this study was to establish normative data for combined MII-EM and to correlate liquid and viscous bolus transit by impedance with esophageal contractions by manometry. METHODS: Forty-three normal volunteers recruited from 4 centers (15 women, 28 men; age range, 21-72 years) underwent combined MII-EM with a catheter containing 4 impedance-measuring segments and 4 solid-state pressure transducers. Each center recruited and analyzed subjects independently, according to pre-established criteria. Each subject received 20 x 5 mL swallows, 10 liquid and 10 viscous material. Tracings were analyzed manually for bolus presence time, bolus head advance time, segmental transit times, total bolus transit time, contraction amplitude, duration, and onset velocity. RESULTS: Ninety-seven and four-tenths percent of manometrically normal liquid and 96.1% of manometrically normal viscous swallows had complete bolus transit by impedance. Almost half (47.2%) of manometrically ineffective liquid and 34.7% of ineffective viscous swallows had complete bolus transit, whereas 91.7% of manometric simultaneous liquid swallows and 54.5% of simultaneous viscous swallows had complete bolus transit. More than 93% of normal individuals had at least 80% complete liquid or at least 70% complete viscous bolus transit. CONCLUSIONS: This study establishes normative data for combined MII-EM. Combined MII-EM may be a more sensitive tool in assessing esophageal function compared to standard manometry because impedance can distinguish different bolus transit patterns. Studies in patients with manometrically defined esophageal motility abnormalities should help clarify the functional importance of manometric ineffective and simultaneous swallows.     

Challenges in the swallowing mechanism: nonobstructive dysphagia in the era of high-resolution manometry and impedance

Esophageal high-resolution manometry (HRM) improves the management of patients with nonobstructive dysphagia. It has increased the diagnostic yield for detecting achalasia and defined three clinically relevant achalasia subtypes. Esophagogastric junction (EGJ) outflow obstruction, defined as an impaired EGJ relaxation in association with some preserved peristalsis, might also represent an achalasia variant in some cases. Using the concept of distal latency, the criteria for defining distal esophageal spasm, have been revised as the occurrence of premature distal contractions. Finally, the combination of HRM and impedance monitoring allows for a functional definition of weak peristalsis associated with incomplete bolus transit.     

Clarification of the esophageal function defect in patients with manometric ineffective esophageal motility: studies using combined impedance-manometry.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Combined multichannel intraluminal impedance (MII) and manometry (MII-EM) recently became available as an esophageal function test. Initial studies in healthy volunteers have shown that a proportion of ineffective contractions actually have complete bolus transit. The aim of our study is to evaluate esophageal bolus transit in patients with manometric patterns of ineffective esophageal motility (IEM). METHODS: All patients referred for esophageal function testing during a 9-month period underwent combined MII-EM studies, including 10 liquid and 10 viscous swallows. IEM is defined as >or=30% liquid swallows with contraction amplitude <30 mm Hg in the distal esophagus. Diagnosis of esophageal transit abnormalities is defined as abnormal bolus transit if >or=30% of liquid and >or=40% of viscous swallows had incomplete bolus transit. RESULTS: Seventy patients (35 women; mean age, 54 yr; range, 17-86 yr) with a manometric diagnosis of IEM were identified of a total of 350 combined MII-EM studies. In these patients, 68% of liquid and 59% of viscous swallows showed normal bolus transit, and almost one third of patients received an overall diagnosis of normal bolus transit for both liquid and viscous swallows. CONCLUSIONS: Our experience with combined MII-EM in patients with a manometric diagnosis of IEM confirms the suspicion that "effectiveness" should only be determined by using a test of esophageal function. Furthermore, we believe our results support a conclusion that a higher level of esophageal diagnostic information is best obtained by combined MII-EM. Future outcome studies should establish its value in patients with nonobstructive dysphagia and in prefundoplication assessment.     

Manometry and radiology. Complementary studies in the assessment of esophageal motility disorders

The relationship between radiological and manometric findings in esophageal motility disorders is poorly understood. Therefore, 20 subjects (4 normal; 13 diffuse spasm; 3 other motility disorders) were studied using synchronous manometry and videofluoroscopy with alternate 5-ml and 10-ml barium swallows. A total of 181 swallows were analyzed. Concordance between manometry and fluoroscopy was excellent for individual swallows (98%), groups of 5 swallows (97%), and final diagnoses (90%). Contraction onset intervals less than 0.8 s apart over 5 cm (velocity greater than 6.25 cm/s) were critical in determining abnormal bolus transit (98% sensitivity and positive predictive value). Radiologically, segmental tertiary activity (complete luminal obliteration) was always associated with disrupted primary peristalsis, but nonsegmental tertiary activity was often seen with normal bolus transit and did not have a specific manometric correlate. Four patterns of interrupted peristalsis radiologically were found--segmental tertiary contractions, a generalized esophageal contraction, absence of motor activity, or discoordinated "to-and-fro" movement. Surprisingly, nearly complete barium clearance occurred by the first two mechanisms in two thirds of swallows. Thus, the authors believe radiology and manometry are both excellent studies for identifying abnormal esophageal peristalsis. In difficult cases, these tests give complementary information because radiology assesses bolus movement while manometry provides quantitative pressure data.     

Utility of esophageal impedance in identifying dysmotility in patients with erosive esophagitis

SUMMARY. This study was intended to assess the utility of combined multiple intraluminal impedance and esophageal manometry (MII‐EM) in evaluating reflux patients and in identifying those with esophageal dysmotility. Thirteen controls and 20 patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) underwent combined MII‐EM with a catheter containing four impedance‐measuring segments and four solid‐state pressure transducers. Each subject received 10 liquid and 10 viscous boluses to be swallowed. Distal esophageal contraction amplitude was significantly lower in GERD patients than in controls for viscous swallows (58.3 ± 7.3 mmHg versus 82.4 ± 4.1 mmHg, P = 0.005). Total bolus transit time was significantly slower in GERD patients than in controls for liquid swallows (P = 0.035). The percentages of complete bolus transit were significantly lower in GERD patients compared with controls (all P = 0.005). Half of GERD patients with normal EM still had abnormal bolus transit while three‐quarters of those with abnormal EM had abnormal bolus transit. MII helps identify bolus transit abnormalities not detected by conventional manometry. Combined MII‐EM is clinically useful for detecting esophageal dysmotility in patients with erosive esophagitis.     

Esophageal scintigraphy to quantitate esophageal transit (quantitation of esophageal transit).

None of the tests employed currently to investigate esophageal transit is quantitative. The purpose of this study was to evaluate normal subjects and patients with a variety of esophageal disorders using a scintigraphic technique to quantitate esophageal transit. After oral administration of a bolus of water labeled with 99mTc-sulfur colloid, isotopic count rates were measured over the esophagus employing a gamma-camera on line to a digital computer. Esophageal transit was expressed as the percent emptying for each of the first 15-sec after the initial swallow and for 15-sec intervals after serial swallows. Sixty-two subjects were studied, including: normal volunteers; patients with motor disorders of the esophagus such as achalasia, diffuse esophageal spasm, and scleroderma; and patients with symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux both with and without esophageal motor dysfunction on manometic testing. Esophageal transit was decreased significantly after single and multiple swallows in patients with motor disorders of the esophagus. In addition, esophageal transit was abnormal in patients with reflux disease accompanied by abnormal motor function. In contrast, esophageal transit was normal after a single swallow, but incomplete after serial swallows in patients with reflux associated with normal esophageal motor function on manometry. We conclude that esophageal scintigraphy may be used to evaluate esophageal transit.     

Therapeutic efficacy of isosorbide dinitrate for dysphagia after endoscopic injection sclerotherapy for varices in cirrhotic patients

Background: Isosorbide dinitrate (ID) improves dysphagia of achalasia patients by lowering the low esophageal pressure. Dysphagia occurs in cirrhotic patients undergoing endoscopic injection sclerotherapy (EIS) for esophageal varices even with no structural abnormalities as its sequela. We tested whether ID can be therapeutic for dysphagia of this type. Methods: ID was given for 2–6 weeks to 13 patients with dysphagia lasting for longer than 4 weeks after EIS despite no esophagolumenal stricture on endoscopy and barium swallows. EIS was done three to six times as an injection series of ethanolamine oleate into the varices at intervals of 1–2 weeks until they were obliterated. The therapeutic efficacy of ID was evaluated by symptom severity four‐degree scorings. Esophageal transit time and emptying time were calculated from the time–activity curves on esophageal scintigraphy. Results: At 2 weeks after ID medication, dysphagia was decreased by one score in 12 of 13 patients, and by two scores in one patient. However, dysphagia at the same extent recurred in nine patients within 6 weeks after stopping ID medication, which was improved similarly by remedication. Two patients in whom dysphagia of one and two scores disappeared after ID medication dropped out because of headache. The remaining two patients remained asymptomatic for longer than 6 months after the first medication. Esophageal scintigraphy disclosed the shortening of the emptying time after ID administration in two patients. Conclusions: ID may be effective for relieving functional dysphagia after EIS for esophageal varices in cirrhotic patients.     

Evaluation of the response to treatment in patients with idiopathic achalasia by the timed barium esophagogram: results from a randomized clinical trial

To choose which treatment would be most effective for the individual patient with newly diagnosed achalasia is difficult for the tending physician. A diagnostic tool that would allow prediction of the symptomatic and functional response after treatment for achalasia is therefore needed. The timed barium esophagogram (TBE) is a method that allows objective assessment of esophageal emptying, but the value of TBE in the clinical management of achalasia remains to be clarified. The aim of this study was first, to assess the ability of TBE to predict symptoms and treatment failure during post‐treatment follow‐up. Second, to determine whether esophageal emptying as assessed by TBE differs after treatment with pneumatic dilatation or laparoscopic myotomy. Fifty‐one patients with newly diagnosed achalasia were prospectively randomized to pneumatic dilatation (n = 26) or laparoscopic myotomy (n = 25). Evaluation with TBE was performed before (n = 46) and after treatment (n = 43). The median interval between treatment and post‐treatment TBE was 6 months, and the median follow‐up time after the post‐treatment TBE was 18 months. Following therapeutic intervention, TBE parameters did not differ significantly between treatment groups. However, significant correlations were found between the height of the barium column at 1 min and the symptom scores at the end of follow up for ‘dysphagia for liquids’ (P < 0.05, rho = 0.47), ‘chest pain’ (P < 0.05, rho = 0.42), and the ‘Watson dysphagia score’ (P < 0.05, rho = 0.46). Patients with less than 50% improvement in this TBE‐parameter (height at 1 min) post‐treatment had a 40% risk of treatment failure during follow‐up. In summary, pneumatic balloon dilatation and laparoscopic myotomy similarly affected esophageal function as assessed by TBE‐emptying. Lack of improvement in barium‐column height post‐treatment was associated with an increased risk of treatment failure which should motivate close surveillance in order to detect symptomatic recurrence at an early stage.     

Evaluation of esophageal motility disorders triggered by ingestion of solids in the case of non-obstructive dysphagia]

The aim of this study was to define the normal manometric pattern of esophageal motility in response to food ingestion and to evaluate the contribution of esophageal manometry in the management of patients complaining of functional dysphagia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-one healthy volunteers and 25 consecutive patients complaining of functional dysphagia with normal conventional esophageal manometry were included in this prospective study. An event marker was used to study the relationship between dysphagia and motility events. RESULTS: Twenty-two out of 25 patients (88%) reported dysphagia during esophageal manometry with food ingestion, while none complained of dysphagia during conventional esophageal manometry. Significantly, food ingestion induced in healthy volunteers and in patients: an increase in the amplitude and duration of esophageal body peristaltic contractions, and a decrease in their propagation speed; an increase in the basal pressure and a decrease in the relaxation percentage of the lower esophageal sphincter during deglutition. The percentage of solid swallows with one or several of the 7 abnormal motility patterns studied prospectively was significantly higher among patients (53.7%) than among healthy volunteers (4.3%) (P < 0.0001); it was also significantly higher among patients during swallows with dysphagia (70.1%) than without dysphagia (33.6%) (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Esophageal manometry with food ingestion is an effective means of defining abnormal motility patterns and their relationship with dysphagia during functional dysphagia.     

Does Diffuse Esophageal Spasm Progress to Achalasia? A Prospective Cohort Study

Diffuse esophageal spasm (DES) and achalasia share both clinical and manometric characteristics. Some reports support the notion of progression of DES to achalasia. However, there are currently no prospective data in support of this theory. To assess prospectively the rate of manometric progression of DES to achalasia. Manometry tracings of DES patients diagnosed between 1992 and 2003 were independently reviewed blindly and agreed on by two esophageal experts. Patients with DES who agreed to undergo repeat esophageal manometry constituted the study cohort. Follow-up manometry tracings were evaluated blindly and independently by the same two interpreters to determine the rate of manometric progression to achalasia. Predictors of manometric progression were assessed. A total of 32 patients were diagnosed with DES between 1992–2003. Twelve patients (9M/3F; median age 62 years) agreed to participate and underwent second manometry (mean ± SD follow-up of 4.8± 3.4 years). Achalasia was diagnosed on follow-up manometry in one patient (8%), seven (58%) patients continued to have DES, three (25%) had normal motility, and one (8%) had nutcracker esophagus. There were no predictors of progression to achalasia based on the initial manometry parameters. A subgroup of DES patients with initial low esophageal body amplitude developed increase in esophageal simultaneous contractions on follow-up similar to the patient who evolved to achalasia. Following were the results. 1) Progression from DES to achalasia is uncommon. 2) DES patients with low esophageal body amplitude may develop increased simultaneous contractions over time. 3) DES remains an elusive diagnosis clinically and manometrically.     

Systematic comparison of conventional oesophageal manometry with oesophageal motility while eating bread.

Conventional oesophageal manometry is seldom accompanied by symptoms and may indeed be normal in patients with a history of dysphagia. We have recently shown that oesophageal manometry during eating may be helpful in the evaluation of patients with dysphagia but there has been little systematic comparison of fed oesophageal motor patterns with conventional clinical manometry. Oesophageal manometry in response to water swallows and during eating was therefore examined in 58 consecutive patients who had been referred for clinical oesophageal function studies. The patients were divided into three groups according to the percentage of peristaltic activity during conventional manometry: group 1 (n = 21) had 100% peristalsis; group 2 (n = 29) had 1-99% peristalsis and group 3 (n = 8) were aperistaltic. All the patients in group 3 had achalasia and remained aperistaltic during eating, however, was less than with water swallows in both group 1 (53% compared with 100%) and group 2 (49% compared with 82.3%) patients. Synchronous contractions and non-conducted swallows were correspondingly increased during eating. Although there was a significant correlation between the amplitude of peristaltic contractions with water and bread in groups 1 and 2, mean peristaltic amplitudes were less with bread than with water swallows. The data show that there are substantial differences in the distal oesophageal motility patterns produced by water swallows and by eating. Conventional manometry with water swallows does not allow prediction of the fed oesophageal motility pattern, except in patients with achalasia.