CDK4/6抑制剂联合内分泌治疗晚期乳腺癌

内分泌治疗因疗效显著并具有安全性,是激素受体阳性(HR+)晚期乳腺癌患者的主要治疗方法。近年来内分泌领域发展迅速,如何延迟或逆转内分泌耐药及内分泌治疗新药物成为临床研究关注的焦点。研究发现,内分泌治疗耐药可能与CDK-RB-E2F通路有关,针对该通路的细胞周期蛋白依赖性激酶(CDK)4/6抑制剂可显著延缓HR+晚期乳腺癌患者内分泌耐药。CDK4/6抑制剂与内分泌药物联合使用,可提高HR+晚期乳腺癌患者的治疗客观缓解率,并可显著改善无进展生存期(PFS)。现就CDK4/6抑制剂的作用机制、药物有效性和安全性及相关临床试验做一综述。     

CDK4/6抑制剂治疗乳腺癌的研究进展

对于HR+/HER-2-乳腺癌患者来说,内分泌治疗扮演着非常重要的角色.长久以来,医学工作者对于此类患者的内分泌耐药机制以及相关治疗方法的讨论也层出不穷.近年来,CDK4/6抑制剂为HR+患者的带来了福音,CDK4/6抑制剂单药治疗与联合内分泌治疗已经用于晚期乳腺癌的治疗.除了内分泌治疗之外,CDK4/6抑制剂还可以与...     

CDK4/6抑制剂联合放疗治疗34例晚期乳腺癌的安全性评估

[目的]评估晚期激素受体阳性/人表皮生长因子受体-2阴性(hormone-receptor positive,HR+/human epidermal growth factor receptor-2-,HER2-)乳腺癌使用细胞周期蛋白依赖性激酶4/6抑制剂(cyclin-dependent kinases 4/6 inhibitors,CDK4/6i)期间联合放疗的安全性。[方法]收集2021年7月至2023年6月34例CDK4/6i±放疗的Ⅲ～Ⅳ期HR+/HER2-乳腺癌的不良事件(adverse events,AEs）。[结果]最常见的AEs是血液学毒性：32.4%患者出现了≥3级骨髓抑制,26.5%出现1～2级骨髓抑制。29.4%出现1～2级非血液学毒性,包括消化道反应（恶心、腹泻、纳差）、疲劳、肝功能异常、骨骼肌肉不适、食管黏膜炎、皮疹等。放疗期间无患者需要减少CDK4/6i剂量或停药。[结论]晚期HR+/HER2-乳腺癌放疗期间使用CDK4/6i没有明显增加毒性反应,安全可控。     

CDK4/6抑制剂在激素受体阳性进展期乳腺癌治疗中的研究进展

内分泌治疗因其兼具良好的疗效及安全性,是激素受体阳性进展期乳腺癌患者的重要治疗手段。近年来内分泌领域进展迅速,很多新型药物相继出现,其中包括多种可以逆转或延迟内分泌耐药的周期蛋白依赖性激酶(cyclin-dependent kinase,CDK)4/6抑制剂。CDK4/6抑制剂联合内分泌治疗可为激素受体阳性进展期乳腺癌患者带来生存获益、延迟至化疗时间,正逐渐改变国内外激素受体阳性进展期乳腺癌的治疗模式。本文将就CDK4/6抑制剂在激素受体阳性进展期乳腺癌中的治疗进展进行综述。     

CDK4/6抑制剂在乳腺癌中的研究进展

摘 要：细胞周期的失调是肿瘤生长和转移的典型标志之一,通过CDK抑制剂重新建立细胞周期的调控在肿瘤靶向治疗的发展中已经成为有吸引力的方向。三种选择性靶向CDK4/6的口服药物已经被研发：palbociclib、abemaciclib和LEE011。当前的研究表明CDK4/6抑制剂与内分泌药物联合治疗激素受体阳性乳腺癌是一个新的标准。全文就细胞周期调控、乳腺癌中cyclinD-CDK4/6-Rb途径及相关蛋白p16和survivin的异常表现、CDK4/6抑制剂的相关临床试验及其结果进行总结。     

CDK4/6抑制剂在乳腺癌治疗中的研究进展

CDK4/6抑制剂与内分泌治疗的组合策略被越来越多地应用于晚期乳腺癌患者的治疗中.然而,CDK4/6抑制剂不仅仅用于ER阳性、HER2阴性晚期乳腺癌患者的治疗中,其研究应用也扩展到了其他的乳腺癌类型中.本文旨在阐述CDK4/6抑制剂的耐药机制和进展后的后续治疗,以及其在三阴性乳腺癌、HER2阳性乳腺癌、肿瘤免疫和生活质...     

CDK4/6抑制剂联合mTOR抑制剂在乳腺癌中的作用机制

CDK-RB-E2F通路和PI3K-AKT-mTOR通路对乳腺癌耐药机制起到了关键作用。通过对两个通路的研究发现,在治疗激素受体阳性的乳腺癌时,CDK4/6抑制剂与内分泌药物联合使用可以提高患者的生存率,mTOR抑制剂也显示出抗肿瘤的实力。最近的研究表明,mTOR抑制剂和CDK4/6抑制剂联合使用可以进一步抑制CDK-RB-E2F通路激活,协同控制肿瘤细胞增殖。同时发现CDK4/6抑制剂耐药患者的CDK-RB-E2F通路重新激活,仍对mTOR抑制剂敏感。还有研究表明CDK4/6抑制剂和mTOR抑制剂可以通过自噬作用协同控制肿瘤的发生。本文针对两药联合在乳腺癌中的作用机制进行综述。     

CDK4/6抑制剂治疗消化道肿瘤的研究进展

摘 要：CDK4/6抑制剂（CDK4/6 inhibitors,CDK4/6i）通过调控Rb/E2F通路,诱导细胞周期停滞,抑制细胞增殖,发挥抗肿瘤作用,被FDA批准用于乳腺癌的治疗,并在多个瘤种中被广泛研究。在消化道肿瘤相关研究中,CDK4/6i表现出较好的抗肿瘤活性,并可与化疗、靶向治疗、免疫治疗和放疗等产生良好的协同效果。全文现就CDK4/6i近年在消化道肿瘤的研究进展作一综述。     

CDK4/6抑制剂联合内分泌治疗晚期乳腺癌研究进展

摘 要：近年来,多项研究显示细胞周期蛋白依赖性激酶4和6( CDK4/6) 抑制剂对于激素受体阳性晚期乳腺癌患者具有较好的疗效,甚至可改善内分泌耐药问题。相关研究表明CDK4/6抑制剂联合内分泌治疗在临床应用中极具前景。     

Ribociclib,a CDK 4/6 inhibitor,plus endocrine therapy in Asian women with advanced breast cancer

The ongoing, Phase Ib MONALEESASIA study is evaluating the efficacy and safety of ribociclib plus endocrine therapy in Asian patients with hormone receptor‐positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2‐negative advanced breast cancer. Eligible patients from Japan, Hong Kong, and Singapore were enrolled in this 2‐phase study consisting of a dose‐escalation phase to determine the maximum‐tolerated dose and the recommended Phase II dose of ribociclib plus letrozole, and a dose‐expansion phase to evaluate safety and tolerability of ribociclib plus letrozole, fulvestrant, or tamoxifen. An exploratory biomarker analysis evaluating expression of target genes was also conducted. In the dose‐escalation phase, the maximum‐tolerated/recommended Phase II doses of ribociclib were lower in Japanese patients (300 mg) than in Asian non‐Japanese patients (600 mg). Ribociclib plus endocrine therapy at the recommended Phase II dose had a manageable safety profile, with neutropenia and elevated liver transaminases being the most common adverse events leading to dose modifications or discontinuations, and it demonstrated evidence of clinical activity in both Japanese and Asian non‐Japanese patients. Preliminary efficacy in Asian populations is similar to that observed in White populations studied in previous ribociclib (MONALEESA) trials. Biomarker analysis demonstrated suppression of pharmacodynamic biomarker gene expression, indicating inhibition of target genes by ribociclib combined with endocrine therapy. Results from the ongoing study support the use of ribociclib in combination with letrozole in Asian non‐Japanese patients at the same dose (600 mg) as White patients. In Japanese patients, a lower dose of ribociclib (300 mg) should be considered. Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02333370.     

Mechanisms of therapeutic CDK4/6 inhibition in breast cancer

Cyclin dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitors have advanced the treatment of metastatic breast cancer by targeting the cell cycle machinery, interrupting intracellular and mitogenic hormone signals that stimulate proliferation of malignant cells. Preclinical evidence demonstrated that derangements of cyclin D1, CDK4/6, and retinoblastoma expression are common in breast cancer, and suggested a therapeutic benefit from interrupting this axis required for cell cycle progression. Studies of cell lines and animal models of breast cancer have demonstrated the complex interplay between the cell cycle and estrogen receptor and human epidermal growth receptor 2 signaling, which informs our understanding of synergistic use of CDK4/6 inhibitors with endocrine therapy, as well as mechanisms of resistance to endocrine therapy. Interestingly, estrogen receptor activity leads to upregulation of cyclin D1 expression, but the estrogen receptor is also in turn activated by cyclin D1, independent of estrogen binding. Early CDK inhibitors were nonspecific and limited by systemic toxicities, while the current generation of CDK4/6 inhibitors have shown promise in the treatment of hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. Preclinical investigations of the three CDK4/6 inhibitors approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (palbociclib, ribociclib, and abemaciclib) lend further insight into their mechanism of action, which will hopefully inform the future use and refinement of these therapies. Finally, we summarize evidence for additional novel CDK4/6 inhibitors currently in development.     

Outcomes and toxicity of concurrent CDK4/6 inhibitor and locoregional radiotherapy for patients with de novo metastatic breast cancer

The objective of the present study was to assess the outcomes and toxicity of patients treated with concurrent administration of CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) and locoregional radiation therapy (RT), including the breast with a boost or the thoracic wall after mastectomy and the regional lymph node areas. We retrospectively analyzed data from 27 patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative de novo metastatic breast cancer treated with CDK4/6i and concomitant locoregional RT in 2017/2022. Survival rates were calculated by Kaplan-Meier method. Prognostic factors were tested with log-rank test. CDK4/6i was used as the first systemic metastatic treatment for all the patients, and the median overall treatment time was 26 months. The median time from initiation of CDK4/6i to the start of RT was 10 months (IQR: 7-14 months). The median duration of concomitant CDK4/6i and RT administration was 21 days (IQR: 14.5-23 days). After a median follow-up of 19 months (IQR: 14-36 months), 1 patient died, 11/27 had distant metastases and 1 patient had local recurrence, respectively. The 1- and 3-years progression-free survival (PFS) were 61.4% (95% CI: 45.1%-83.7%) and 53.7% (35.8%-80.5%), respectively. The acute toxicities most observed during RT were neutropenia (44%) and dermatitis (37%). Dermatitis was significantly more frequent in patients with large target volumes (CTV > 911 cc and PTV > 1285 cc). CDK4/6i had to be discontinued in five patients during RT (due to toxicity in three cases and disease progression in two cases). One patient has developed grade 2 late pulmonary fibrosis. Finally, our study demonstrated that concurrent administration of locoregional RT and CDK4/6i did not induce severe late toxicity for most patients.     

乳腺癌新辅助内分泌治疗与靶向治疗联合应用研究进展北大核心

新辅助内分泌治疗是雌激素受体(estrogen receptor,ER)阳性乳腺癌患者的一种潜在的治疗选择,但由于缺乏与新辅助化疗疗效的对比和治疗持续时间的可靠数据,且病理完全缓解率(pathological complete response,pCR)低,目前仅在年老体弱的患者中使用。然而,靶向药物如细胞周期蛋白依赖激酶(Cyclin-dependent kinase,CDK)4/6抑制剂、哺乳动物雷帕霉素靶蛋白(mammalian target of rapamycin,mTOR)抑制剂等结合内分泌治疗,已经在晚期乳腺癌的治疗中取得了成功,为患者带来了显著的获益。在早期乳腺癌的新辅助治疗中,内分泌治疗联合靶向治疗仍处于研究阶段,最近的数据展现出了有希望的应用前景。本文旨在评估新辅助内分泌治疗联合靶向治疗在ER阳性乳腺癌治疗中的现状,希望为后续的临床研究及应用提供参考。     

CDK4/6 inhibitor plus endocrine therapy for hormone receptor‐positive,HER2‐negative metastatic breast cancer: The new standard of care

Patients presenting with hormone receptor‐positive (HR⁺), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2‐negative (HER2^–) metastatic breast cancer (MBC) are usually treated with endocrine therapy (ET), except if there is a concern about endocrine resistance or a need to achieve rapid disease control due to visceral crisis. The combination of CDK4/6 inhibitor + ET has now replaced single‐agent ET as the standard first‐line treatment; and it can also be considered a standard option in the second‐line setting. This review briefly summarizes recently reported efficacy findings from the key phase III clinical trials of CDK4/6 inhibitor + ET in patients with HR⁺/HER2^– MBC, including evidence that adding a CDK4/6 inhibitor to ET improves overall survival and does so without reducing patients’ quality of life. There is still much to learn regarding the use of CDK4/6 inhibitors and how they may be optimally integrated into clinical practice. In particular, there is a need for specific biomarkers that help predict the likelihood of response or resistance to CDK4/6 inhibitor therapy; and for data to guide treatment decisions when a patient's disease progresses on a CDK4/6 inhibitor.     

Molecular mechanisms of resistance to CDK4/6 inhibitors in breast cancer: A review

Deregulation of the cyclin D-CDK4/6-INK4-RB pathway leading to uncontrolled cell proliferation, is frequently observed in breast cancer. Currently, three selective CDK4/6 inhibitors have been FDA approved: palbociclib, ribociclib and abemaciclib. Despite promising clinical outcomes, intrinsic or acquired resistance to CDK4/6 inhibitors has limited the success of these treatments; therefore, the development of various strategies to overcome this resistance is of great importance. We highlight the various mechanisms that are directly or indirectly responsible for resistance to CDK4/6 inhibitors, categorizing them into two broad groups; cell cycle-specific mechanisms and cell cycle-nonspecific mechanisms. Elucidation of the diverse mechanisms through which resistance to CDK4/6 inhibitors occurs, may aid in the design of novel therapeutic strategies to improve patient outcomes. This review summarizes the currently available knowledge regarding mechanisms of resistance to CDK4/6 inhibitors, and possible therapeutic strategies that may overcome this resistance as well.