Does the Vascular Surgery Board of the American Board of Surgery work?

Recommendations to form an independent American Board of Vascular Surgery were made several years ago by leaders in vascular surgery. All major vascular societies in the United States voted by majority rule to approve the formation of this organization. Although the Vascular Surgery Board of the American Board of Surgery is well intentioned, its focus and intentions are outdated because it is subservient to the American Board of Surgery.     

American Board of Surgery examinations: can we identify surgery residency applicants and residents who will pass the examinations on the first attempt?

Background

The Residency Review Committee requires that 65% of general surgery residents pass the American Board of Surgery qualifying and certifying examinations on the first attempt. The aim of this study was to identify predictors of successful first-attempt completion of the examinations.

Methods

Age, sex, Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Medical Society status, class rank, honors in third-year surgery clerkship, interview score, rank list number, National Board of Medical Examiners/United States Medical Licensing Examination scores, American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination scores, resident awards, and faculty evaluations of senior residents were reviewed. Graduates who passed both examinations on the first attempt were compared with those who failed either examination on the first attempt.

Results

No subjective evaluations of performance predicted success other than resident awards. Significant objective predictors of successful first-attempt completion of the examinations were Alpha Omega Alpha status, ranking within the top one third of one's medical student class, National Board of Medical Examiners/United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 (>200, top 50%) and Step 2 (>186.5, top 3 quartiles) scores, and American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination scores >50th percentile (postgraduate years 1 and 3) and >33rd percentile (postgraduate years 4 and 5).

Conclusions

Residency programs can use this information in selecting residents and in identifying residents who may need remediation.     

The historic predictive value of Canadian orthopedic surgery residents’ orthopedic in-training examination scores on their success on the RCPSC certification examination

Background

Positive correlation between the orthopedic in-training examination (OITE) and success in the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery examination has been reported. Canadian training programs in internal medicine, anesthesiology and urology have found a positive correlation between in-training examination scores and performance on the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada (RCPSC) certification examination. We sought to determine the potential predictive value of the OITE scores of Canadian orthopedic surgery residents on their success on their RCPSC examinations.

Methods

A total of 118 Canadian orthopedic surgery residents had their annual OITE scores during their 5 years of training matched to the RCPSC examination oral and multiple-choice questions and to overall examination pass/fail scores. We calculated Pearson correlations between the in-training examination for each postgraduate year and the certification oral and multiple-choice questions and pass/fail marks.

Results

There was a predictive association between the OITE and success on the RCPSC examination. The association was strongest between the OITE and the written multiple-choice examination and weakest between the OITE and the overall examination pass/fail marks.

Conclusion

Overall, the OITE was able to provide useful feedback to Canadian orthopedic surgery residents and their training programs in preparing them for their RCPSC examinations. However, when these data were collected, truly normative data based on a Canadian sample were not available. Further study is warranted based on a more refined analysis of the OITE, which is now being produced and includes normative percentile data based on Canadian residents.     

Does the National Board of Medical Examiners' Surgery Subtest level the playing field?

BACKGROUND: We sought to determine if scores on the National Board of Medical Examiners' Surgery Subject Examination (NBME-SS) correlated with ward assessment of Fund of Knowledge and how the NBME-SS scores impacted surgery clerkship grade. METHODS: Student evaluations from 4 academic years (1999-2003) were analyzed. Scores from the Fund of Knowledge subsection were compared with scores on the NBME-SS. Student final grades were calculated with (at a weight of 10%) and without NBME-SS score. RESULTS: Data were available for all 399 students who rotated on surgery during the study period. Fund of Knowledge score and NBME-SS scores correlated minimally (Pearson's r = 0.108, P = 0.031). Performance on the NBME-SS helped 11% of students' grades, but 64% of students' grades were hurt. Fifteen percent of the students missed receiving honors because of their performance on the NBME-SS. CONCLUSIONS: The NBME-SS negatively influenced the grades of a large proportion of students and correlated only minimally with Fund of Knowledge scores as assessed on ward evaluations.     

The Anaesthetists' Travel Club: a transformation of the Society of Clinical Surgery?

There is a remarkable similarity between the purposes and formats of the Society of Clinical Surgery and the Anesthetists' Travel Club. The Travel Club's founder, John Lundy, worked closely with two charter members of the Society of Clinical Surgery,William J. and Charles Mayo.