Ludwig's angina: Case report and review

Modern dental care and use of antibiotics for oral infections have made Ludwig's angina rare. To avoid acute airway obstruction, emergency physicians must be able to rapidly recognize and treat this condition. A typical case of Ludwig's angina is presented, followed by a review of clinical findings and therapeutic modalities. Emphasis is made on airway management, antibiotics, and surgical drainage.     

Sialolithiasis with abscess: An uncommon presentation of a Ludwig's angina mimic

Sialolithiasis represents the most common issue of the salivary gland, ranging from asymptomatic to airway compromising. In rapidly progressing, completely obstructive salivary stones, the presentation can mimic emergent oropharyngeal diseases, primarily Ludwig's angina. We present a case of a large and obstructive sialolith with abscess whose initial presentation was concerning for Ludwig's angina with impending airway compromise. While a common complaint, emergency providers should be aware of the nefarious presentation of an everyday complaint.     

What is the Role of Sugammadex in the Emergency Department?

BackgroundSugammadex is a medication newly available to many emergency physicians. It effectively, and within minutes, reverses neuromuscular blockade in patients who have received rocuronium or vecuronium. The role of sugammadex for the reversal of neuromuscular blockade after rapid sequence intubation in the emergency department (ED) is evolving, and limited emergency medicine-specific literature exists.ObjectiveThis narrative review evaluates the role of sugammadex for the reversal of neuromuscular blockade in the ED.DiscussionThe basic pharmacology, duration of action, adverse effects, and important medication and disease interactions specific to sugammadex are well described. Case reports suggest sugammadex can reverse neuromuscular blockade to facilitate an urgent, neurologic examination by an emergency physician or consultant. Multiple case reports of failure to improve airway patency with the use of sugammadex, even when neuromuscular blockade is completely reversed, and concern for added difficulty of definitive airway management in a patient with spontaneous movement suggest that sugammadex should largely be omitted from failed or difficult airway management strategies. Instead, it is important to focus on the ability to oxygenate and ventilate, including progression to surgical airway or jet ventilation if needed.ConclusionSugammadex is an effective, rapid reversal agent for rocuronium and has the potential use to facilitate an urgent neurologic examination shortly after administration of rocuronium. Its routine inclusion in a failed or difficult emergency airway is not supported by available literature.     

Deformed pediatric forearm fractures: Predictors of successful reduction by emergency providers

IntroductionForearm fractures are common pediatric injuries. Most displaced or angulated fractures can be managed via closed reduction in the operating room or in the Emergency Department (ED). Previous research has shown that emergency physicians can successfully perform closed reduction within ED; however, the fracture morphology amendable to ED physician reduction is unclear. The aim of this study is to detail the fracture characteristics associated with successful reduction by ED physicians.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective study of children (aged <18 years) presenting to the ED of a tertiary care children's hospital (annual census 90,000) between January 2018 and December 2018 with closed distal and midshaft forearm fractures requiring reduction. Data collected included patient demographics, fracture morphology, management, and complications. Successful ED physician reduction was based on predefined criteria. Orthopedic referrals included those patients sent directly to the operating room, closed reductions performed by orthopedic trainees within the ED, and patients requiring orthopedic consultation after failed ED reduction.ResultsA total of 340 patients with forearm fractures were included in the study. ED clinicians attempted to reduce 274 (80.6%) of these fractures and were successful in 256/274 (93.4%) cases. Of the 84 orthopedic referrals, 18 were after failed ED clinician attempt, and 66 were ab initio managed by orthopedics (37 in the operating room and 29 in ED). Compared to the fractures with successful ED reduction (n = 256), factors associated with orthopedic referral (n = 84) included: increasing age, midshaft location, higher degree of angulation, and completely displaced fractures. Angulated distal greenstick fractures were most likely to be successfully reduced by ED clinicians. There were no difference in complication rates between the two groups.ConclusionIn this series, fractures most amenable to reduction by ED clinicians include distal greenstick fractures, whereas midshaft and completely displaced fractures are more likely to need treatment by orthopedics.     

Cerebrovascular risks with rapid blood pressure lowering in the absence of hypertensive emergency

Study objectiveIn the Emergency Department (ED) setting, clinicians commonly treat severely elevated blood pressure (BP) despite the absence of evidence supporting this practice. We sought to determine if this rapid reduction of severely elevated BP in the ED has negative cerebrovascular effects.MethodsThis was a prospective quasi-experimental study occurring in an academic emergency department. The study was inclusive of patients with a systolic BP (SBP) > 180 mm Hg for whom the treating clinicians ordered intensive BP lowering with intravenous or short-acting oral agents. We excluded patients with clinical evidence of hypertensive emergency. We assessed cerebrovascular effects with measurements of middle cerebral artery flow velocities and any clinical neurological deterioration.ResultsThere were 39 patients, predominantly African American (90%) and male (67%) and with a mean age of 50 years. The mean pre-treatment SBP was 210 ± 26 mm Hg. The mean change in SBP was ?38 mm Hg (95% CI ?49 to ?27) mm Hg. The average change in cerebral mean flow velocity was ?5 (95% CI ?7 to ?2) cm/s, representing a ?9% (95% CI ?14% to ?4%) change. Two patients (5.1%, 95% CI 0.52–16.9%) had an adverse neurological event.ConclusionWhile this small cohort did not find an overall substantial change in cerebral blood flow, it demonstrated adverse cerebrovascular effects from rapid BP reduction in the emergency setting.     

Comparative Study of Airway Management Techniques with Restricted Access to Patient Airway

Objective. To determine which airway endotracheal tube (ET), Combitube (CT), or Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) has the shortest time to successful ventilation in three nontraditional prehospital airway scenarios. Methods. Prospective randomized cohort study of emergency medicine (EM) residents, faculty EM physicians, andparamedics (EMT-P). Subjects were instructed to place an airway in a mannequin in three scenarios: mannequin supine under a table with head abutting a wall, mannequin sitting upright with access from behind, andmannequin lying on its side with access facing the mannequin. The number of airway placement attempts andtime to successful ventilation were recorded. Results. Twenty-five resident physicians, 9 faculty physicians, and22 EMT-Ps participated. No significant difference was found between the different airways in the number of attempts to successfully ventilate. EMT-Ps demonstrated significantly faster times to successful ventilation for all scenarios versus physicians (e.g., supine scenario with ET, EMT-P median time 57 seconds, physician median time 96 seconds) except for the mannequin lying on its side where there was no significant difference. The time to ventilation for all scenarios was less with the LMA versus ET or CT versus ET, except in the sitting scenario where ET andCT were comparable Conclusions. In this mannequin model of restricted airway access, LMA resulted in significantly faster times to ventilation versus ET andCT in all but one scenario. Further consideration andstudy using airways other than ET are warranted for situations with restricted access to the patient's airway.     

Communication Training and Code Status Conversation Patterns Reported by Emergency Clinicians

ContextDuring acute health decompensations for seriously ill patients, emergency clinicians often determine the intensity end-of-life care. Little is known about how emergency clinicians conduct these conversations, especially among those who have received serious illness communication training.ObjectivesTo determine the self-reported practice patterns of code status conversations by emergency clinicians with and without serious illness communication training.MethodsA cross-sectional survey was conducted among emergency clinicians with and without a recent evidence-based, serious illness communication training tailored for emergency clinicians. Emergency clinicians were included from two academic medical centers. A five-point Likert scale (“very unlikely” to “very likely” to ask) was used to assess the self-reported likelihood of asking about patients’ preferences for medical procedures and patients’ values and goals.ResultsAmong 161 respondents (71% response rate), 77 (48%) received the training. A total of 70% of emergency clinicians reported asking about procedure-based questions, and only 38% reported asking about patient's values regarding end-of-life care. For value-based questions, statistically significant differences were observed between emergency clinicians who underwent the training and those who did not in four of the seven questions asked (e.g., the higher odds of exploring the patient's life priorities [adjusted OR = 4.34, 95% CI = 1.95–9.65, P-value < 0.001]). No difference was observed in the self-reported rates of all procedure-based questions between the two groups.ConclusionMost emergency clinicians reported asking about procedure-based questions, and some asked about patient's value-based questions. Clinicians with recent serious illness communication training may ask more about some values and priorities.     

Evaluation and management of pulmonary hypertension in the emergency department setting

BackgroundPulmonary hypertension (PH) is characterized by increased pulmonary vascular resistance and pulmonary arterial pressure and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality.ObjectiveThis narrative review evaluates PH, outlines the complex pathophysiologic derangements, and addresses the emergency department (ED) management of this patient population.DiscussionApproximately 10–20% of individuals in the United States suffer from PH. Each year nearly 12,000 PH patients seek care in the ED for a variety of symptoms which may or may not be related to PH. There are 5 classes of PH, some of which respond to particular therapies outlined in this review. As presenting complaints are frequently vague and non-specific, emergency physicians must recognize manifestations of PH and complications related to PH to deliver appropriate care. Early imaging with chest radiograph, bedside echocardiogram, and computed tomography can assist in determining the underlying etiology of PH exacerbation. Restarting oral or intravenous PH medications that may have been discontinued is crucial in initial management. Immense care should be taken to avoid hypoxia and hypercarbia as well as maintaining right ventricular preload support. In addition to correction of underlying precipitants, judicious vasopressor and inotrope use can help to correct pathophysiology and avoid further airway intervention.ConclusionsAn understanding of the pathophysiology of PH and available emergency treatments can assist emergency clinicians in reducing the immediate morbidity and mortality associated with this disease. Restarting maintenance PH medications and proper selection of vasopressors and inotropes will benefit decompensating patients with PH.     

Incidence of difficult airway situations during prehospital airway management by emergency physicians—A retrospective analysis of 692 consecutive patients

IntroductionIn the prehospital setting, advanced airway management is challenging as it is frequently affected by facial trauma, pharyngeal obstruction or limited access to the patient and/or the patient's airway. Therefore, incidence of prehospital difficult airway management is likely to be higher compared to the in-hospital setting and success rates of advanced airway management range between 80 and 99%.Methods3961 patients treated by an emergency physician in Zurich, Switzerland were included in this retrospective analysis in order to determine the incidence of a difficult airway along with potential circumstantial risk factors like gender, necessity of CPR, NACA score, GCS, use and type of muscle relaxant and use of hypnotic drugs.Results692 patients underwent advanced prehospital airway management. Seven patients were excluded due to incomplete or incongruent documentation, resulting in 685 patients included in the statistical analysis. Difficult intubation was recorded in 22 patients, representing an incidence of a difficult airway of 3.2%. Of these 22 patients, 15 patients were intubated successfully, whereas seven patients (1%) had to be ventilated with a bag valve mask during the whole procedure.ConclusionIn this physician-led service one out of five prehospital patients requires airway management. Incidence of advanced prehospital difficult airway management is 3.2% and eventual success rate is 99%, if performed by trained emergency physicians. A total of 1% of all prehospital intubation attempts failed and alternative airway device was necessary.     

Ludwig angina: forewarned is forearmed

While the incidence of Ludwig angina is decreasing, this is an important disease process because failure to control the airway can have catastrophic consequences. Accurate diagnosis, airway control, antibiotic therapy, and, occasionally, surgical management are essential for patient safety. Ludwig angina is caused by a rapidly expanding cellulitis of the floor of the mouth and is characterized by hardened induration of the floor and suprahyoid region bilaterally with an elevation of the tongue potentially obstructing the airway. In the preantibiotic era, Ludwig angina was frequently fatal; however, antibiotics and aggressive surgical treatment have significantly lowered mortality.     

Do you see what I see: A mother's plea

There is sometimes dissonance between the medical services that the general public expects an ED to provide and the acute critical care that emergency clinicians hope to provide. One explanation for this is that the ED is both a territory and a meeting place for a cornucopia of clinicians, some of whom are not ED clinicians themselves. Roles are sometimes ambiguous and location‐specific. Recently, one Queensland mother believed that her son's suicide could have been prevented had emergency staff been better educated. This perspective aims to reflect on several pertinent questions: Should suicide risk be treated as a medical emergency? Is suicide prevention everyone's business? Is suicide risk assessment and management a core component of ED ? How common, precise and non‐stigmatising is the language around suicide? To what extent is that language underpinned by mythology rather than fact? For some, these will be inconvenient questions. How they are answered is undoubtedly framed within the language used when discussing suicide.     

Factors associated with destination of pediatric EMS transports

ObjectivePediatric patients comprise 13% of emergency medical services (EMS) transports, and most are transported to general emergency departments (ED). EMS transport destination policies may guide when to transport patients to a children's hospital, especially for medical complaints. Factors that influence EMS providers ‘decisions about where to transport children are unknown.Our objective was to evaluate the factors associated with pediatric EMS transports to children's hospitals for medical complaints.MethodsWe performed a cross-sectional study of a large, urban EMS system over a 12-month period for all transports of patients 0–17 years old. We electronically queried the EMS database for demographic data, medical presentation and management, comorbidities, and documented reasons for choosing destination. Distances to the destination hospital and nearest children's and community hospital (if not the transport destination) were calculated. Univariate and multiple logistic regression analyses were conducted to determine the association between independent variables and the transport destination.ResultsWe identified 10,065 patients, of which 6982 (69%) were for medical complaints. Of these medical complaints, 3518 (50.4%) were transported to a children's hospital ED. Factors associated with transport to a children's hospital include ALS transport, greater transport distance, protocol determination, developmental delay, or altered consciousness. Factors associated with transport to general EDs were older age, unknown insurance status, lower income, greater distance to children's or community hospital, destination determined by closest facility or diversion, abnormal respiratory rate or blood glucose, psychiatric primary impression, or communication barriers present.ConclusionsWe found that younger patient age, EMS protocol requirements, and paramedic scene response may influence pediatric patient transport to both children's and community hospitals. Socioeconomic factors, ED proximity, diversion status, respiratory rate, chief complaints, and communication barriers may also be contributing factors. Further studies are needed to determine the generalizability of these findings to other EMS systems.     

New-Onset Seizure in Patient Medicated With Bupropion for Smoking Cessation: A Case Report

BackgroundBupropion is a pharmacologic agent approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration as an antidepressant and to support smoking cessation. Because reduction of seizure threshold is a rare but serious side effect of bupropion, its use in patients with a known history of seizures is contraindicated. We report a patient without seizure risk factors who presented to the emergency department (ED) with new-onset seizures secondary to bupropion use.Case ReportA 66-year-old female presented to the ED by emergency medical services with altered mental status. She was determined to be postictal after a witnessed new-onset seizure 4 days after starting bupropion for smoking cessation. She had no personal or family history of seizure disorders, although her medication list raised suspicion that recent discontinuation of alprazolam may have contributed to a reduced seizure threshold.Why Should an Emergency Physician Be Aware of This?New-onset seizures secondary to bupropion use are less likely in patients with no personal or family history of seizure disorders. Emergency medicine clinicians should be aware, however, of the seizure risk associated with bupropion regardless of personal risk factors. Discontinuation of bupropion should be considered if determined to be a contributor to seizures.     

Emergency department methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus nare screen effect on pneumonia treatment duration

Study objectiveThe objective of this study was to determine if performing a methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) nasal screen in the emergency department (ED) decreased general medicine patient exposure to anti-MRSA antibiotics for pneumonia.MethodsThis was a single-center, retrospective study evaluating patients who had a diagnosis of pneumonia and were initiated on anti-MRSA therapy (vancomycin or linezolid) in the ED and subsequently admitted to a general medicine floor. Patients were divided into two groups: 1) did not receive a MRSA nares screen in the ED (No MRSA screen group) or 2) received a MRSA nares screen in the ED (MRSA screen group). The primary outcome was anti-MRSA antibiotic duration. Secondary outcomes included vancomycin level evaluation, hospital survival, and acute kidney injury.ResultsOf the 116 patients included, 37 patients received a MRSA nares screen in the ED and 79 patients did not. Median duration of antibiotic exposure was similar for both groups (No MRSA screen, 30.5 h [interquartile range (IQR) 20.5–52.5] vs. MRSA screen, 24.5 h [IQR 20.6–40.3]; p = 0.28). Of patients who were screened, 35 were negative and 2 were positive. Secondary outcomes were similar.ConclusionPerforming a MRSA nares screen in the ED for patients diagnosed with pneumonia, initiated on anti-MRSA antibiotics, and admitted to a general medicine floor did not decrease duration of anti-MRSA antibiotics. At this time, ED providers do not need to consider a MRSA nasal screen in the ED for patients being admitted to general medicine, although larger studies could be considered.     

The prediction levels of emergency clinicians about the outcome of the ambulance patients and outpatients

AimThe increased number of emergency clinic patients causes the length of stay in the emergency department, low patient satisfaction and dismiss of real emergency patients. In this study, we aimed to determine the prediction levels of emergency clinicians according to working year on the outcome of the ambulance patients and outpatients presented to the emergency department (ED).Materials & methodsThis prospective study included patients over 18 years old. The triage of outpatients was made by a senior nurse and patients were divided into three triage categories such as green, yellow and red. Then these patients were evaluated by the emergency physician at the examination areas. Ambulance patients were directly evaluated by the emergency physician. These ambulance patients were noted as yellow or red according to triage categories. The main complaints, triage category, presentation method, vital signs, predicted outcome noted by the clinicians.ResultsThe correct prediction levels of hospitalisation (clinic/intensive care unit) were higher in clinicians whose working year is between 6 and 10 years (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference between 6–10 year and >10 year group according to prediction level (p > 0.05). Prediction of dischargement was higher in 0–5 year group than 6–10 year (p < 0.05) and >10 year (p < 0.05) group.ConclusionExperienced clinicians can make much more accurate prediction on length of stay and the prognosis of the emergency patients so crowded follow-up areas of the emergency room can be planned much more effectively.     

Midazolam andDiazepam for Pediatric Seizures in the Prehospital Setting

Objective. The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy andadverse events associated with the use of diazepam andmidazolam for the treatment of pediatric seizures in the prehospital setting. Methods. This was a retrospective cohort study of all patients younger than 18 years treated for a seizure with a benzodiazepine by emergency medical services in Multnomah County, Oregon, from 1998 to 2001. The emergency medical services system consists of a single private advanced life support transporting ambulance service with fire department first responders that are all advanced life support capable. The benzodiazepine used changed from diazepam to midazolam at the midpoint of this period. The primary outcomes were termination of the seizure by arrival to the emergency department (ED), recurrence of seizure while in the ED, or the requirement for active airway interventions including intubation. The two cohorts were also compared for demographics, past history of seizures, long-term use of seizure medications, response times, route of administration, use of second doses of benzodiazepines, andfinal disposition. Results. Forty-five patients were treated with diazepam, and48 were treated with midazolam. The two cohorts were comparable except the diazepam cohort had a significantly increased proportion of patients with previous afebrile seizures (53% vs. 25%; p = 0.005). The midazolam cohort had an increased use of nonintravenous route for initial dosing (65% vs. 42%; p = 0.02). The two cohorts were equivalent in rates of termination of seizures before to ED arrival, recurrence of seizures in the ED, requiring airway support or a second dose of benzodiazepine, andadmission to the hospital. Conclusions. Diazepam andmidazolam appear to be equivalent in treating seizures andcausing adverse events. Paramedics appear to be administering midazolam intramuscularly more often than they use diazepam rectally.