The effect of proprioceptive knee bracing on knee stability after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

BackgroundInjury to the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is common among young athletes and can impact knee stability and control. Wearing proprioceptive knee braces can improve knee control and may reduce the risk factors associated with injury and re-injury, although the effect of such braces after ACL reconstruction (ACLR) is unclear.Research questionThis study aimed to determine the effect of proprioceptive knee bracing on knee control and subjective rating of participants post ACLR during three dynamic tasks.MethodsFifteen participants 2–10 years post ACLR performed a slow step down, single leg drop jump, and pivot turn jump with and without a proprioceptive knee brace. Knee kinematics in the sagittal (flexion – extension), coronal (abduction – adduction), and transverse (internal – external rotation) planes were collected using a 3D infrared system. Paired t-tests were performed to explore differences in knee angles and angular velocities between the no brace and brace conditions during the three tasks. After each task, subjective ratings regarding ease of the task were recorded.ResultsThe brace reduced the peak knee external rotation angle and range of motion in the transverse plane during the pivot turn jump task, and significantly increased the maximum knee flexion angular velocity during the single leg drop jump task. The majority of participants reported that tasks were easier to perform with the proprioceptive brace than without.SignificanceThis study confirms that proprioceptive knee braces can significantly influence knee kinematics during dynamic tasks post ACLR. The observed effects were clinically relevant.     

Proprioception after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with and without bracing

In this investigation we evaluated the effect of ACL reconstruction and functional knee bracing on knee proprioception. Twenty subjects who experienced acute ACL disruption and underwent reconstruction with a bone-patellar tendon-bone graft participated in a controlled rehabilitation program and were studied at a mean follow-up of 2 years. A control group of ten subjects were also studied. In both groups proprioception was evaluated by measuring the threshold to detection of passive motion (TDPM) with the knee at 15 degrees of flexion with and without a functional knee brace applied. The Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Cincinnati knee score, and two functional knee tests were also used as outcome measurements. Anterior-posterior displacement of the tibia relative to the femur was evaluated with the KT-1000 arthrometer. There were no significant differences in TDPM between the ACL-reconstructed and contralateral knees, or between the ACL reconstructed group and the healthy control group. Bracing did not produce a significant change in the TDPM for the ACL-reconstructed group or for the control group. There were low to moderate correlations between TDPM and the other outcome measurements. This study indicates that there is no significant differences in proprioception between the ACL-reconstructed knee and the contralateral uninvolved knee 1 year or more after surgery. Functional knee bracing does not seem to improve proprioception in patients who have undergone ACL reconstruction and been followed up on average 2 years after surgery.     

The effect of anterior cruciate ligament trauma and bracing on knee proprioception

We studied the effect that chronic anterior cruciate ligament disruption, functional bracing, and a neoprene sleeve have on knee proprioception by measuring the threshold to detection of passive knee motion in all three conditions. The threshold to detection of passive knee motion was worse in knees with chronic anterior cruciate ligament insufficiency when compared with uninjured knees. This difference was small, on average an additional 0.28 degree of flexion-extension rotation was required for the anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee before the subject detected motion, and of questionable significance from a clinical and functional perspective. Wearing a functional brace or neoprene sleeve on the anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee did not significantly change the threshold to detection of passive motion in comparison with the same knee without a brace, although improvements were observed. There was no relationship between the most common clinical means of characterizing altered biomechanics of the anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee (that is, the magnitude of anterior-posterior knee laxity and the grade of pivot shift) and the threshold to detection of passive knee motion.     

Impact biomechanics of lateral knee bracing. The anterior cruciate ligament

We evaluated the effects of six different prophylactic braces on ACL ligament strain under dynamic valgus loads using a mechanical surrogate limb validated against human cadaveric specimens. Medical collateral ligament and anterior cruciate ligament peak forces, medial collateral ligament and anterior cruciate ligament tension initiation times, and impact safety factors were calculated for both braced and unbraced conditions. These tests were conducted to determine whether or not application of a prophylactic brace might provide protection to the anterior cruciate ligament under valgus loading conditions. The results of this study indicate that those braces that increased impact duration appear to differentially protect the anterior cruciate ligament more than the medial collateral ligament, and that most of the braces tested appear to provide some degree of protection to the anterior cruciate ligament under direct lateral impacts. These findings should be confirmed clinically.     

No benefit of bracing on the early outcome after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Forty patients were prospectively investigated to evaluate the effects of bandaging after reconstructive surgery of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL). For the 6 weeks of the postoperative course, the operated knee was bandaged in 20 patients (group A) and braced in the other 20 patients (group B). The isokinetic torque for extension and flexion (Cybex) and the range of motion (ROM) were investigated after 6, 12, 24 and 52 weeks postoperatively. At 24 weeks and 1 year postoperatively the stability of the knee joint (KT-1000) as well as the clinical outcome (‘Orthopädische Arbeitsgemeinschaft Knie’) were evaluated. No statistically significant differences between the two groups were found for the extension and flexion strengths. Free ROM was achieved significantly earlier in group A than in group B. No statistically significant differences regarding the stability of the operated knee joint nor the early outcome were found between the two groups. This study demonstrated that the renunciation of using a brace had no adverse effect on the early outcome with respect to stability and function. On the contrary, bracing seems not to be mandatory after ACL reconstruction when the central third of the patellar tendon is used.     

Effect of functional bracing on knee injury in skiers with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND: The role of knee bracing in anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions is controversial. HYPOTHESIS: Functional bracing will have an effect on subsequent knee injury in skiers with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: From 1991 to 1997, 11606 skiers at a major destination ski resort underwent preseason knee screening. The anterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed group consisted of 820 skiers who had had an anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction 2 years or more earlier. Of these, 257 skiers selected the use of functional knee brace during skiing. The dependent variable was subsequent knee injury, identified via workers' compensation records. Covariates included age, gender, ski occupation, Lachman grade, pivot-shift grade, KT-1000 arthrometer manual maximum displacement, and use of a functional brace. Univariate and multivariate risk factors for subsequent knee injury were determined. RESULTS: In this study, 257 skier-employees with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction wore braces and 563 skier-employees with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction did not. Braced skiers had significantly higher preseason rates of grade II or higher Lachman and pivot-shift tests (braced, 29% and 22%, respectively; nonbraced, 11% and 10%, respectively; P < .05). Sixty-one subsequent knee injuries were identified, 51 (8.9 injuries/100 knees/ski season) in the nonbraced group and 10 (4.0 injuries/100 knees/ski season) in the braced group (P = .009). Nonbraced skiers were 2.74 times more likely to suffer subsequent injury than were braced skiers (odds ratio, 2.74 [confidence interval, 1.2-4.9]). Logistic regression modeling identified nonbracing as a significant independent multivariate risk factor for subsequent knee injury in the high-demand skiers with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. CONCLUSION: Because of the increased risk of subsequent knee injury in nonbraced skiers, the authors recommend functional bracing for skiers with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Whether the protective effect of functional bracing can be extrapolated to other high-demand patients is yet to be determined.     

Combined unicompartmental knee arthroplasty and anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Purpose  

Patients presenting anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) deficiency and isolated osteoarthritis of the medial compartment are treated either with biplanar osteotomy or with total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, these patients between the forties and fifties are often very active in daily life and feel limited due to their knee. In order to follow the idea of preserving as much as possible from the joint, the concept of unicondylar joint replacement in conjunction with ACL reconstruction has been followed. There seems to be a limited experience with this concept. The purpose of the follow-up study was to evaluate the midterm clinical and functional outcome.     

Impaired voluntary quadriceps force control following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: relationship with knee function

Purpose

Impairments in quadriceps force control and altered quadriceps and hamstring muscle activation strategies have been observed following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction; however, the functional implications of these impairments are unclear. This study examined the cross-sectional associations between quadriceps force control, quadriceps activation, hamstring coactivation and clinically assessed knee function following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with a hamstring graft.

Methods

Sixty-six patients (18 ± 3 months following surgery) and 41 uninjured individuals participated. Quadriceps force control was assessed using an isometric knee extension task. Participants cyclically increased and decreased quadriceps force at slow speeds between 5 and 30 % maximum voluntary isometric contraction matching a moving target displayed on a screen. Quadriceps activation and hamstring coactivation were assessed concurrently using surface electromyography. Knee function was assessed with the Cincinnati Knee Rating Scale and three single-leg hop tests.

Results

The reconstructed group completed the task with 48 % greater root-mean-square error (RMSE), indicating significantly worse quadriceps force control (p < 0.001). In a multivariable model adjusted for sex, greater RMSE and greater lateral hamstring coactivation were significantly associated with worse knee function that is greater odds of scoring <85 % on one or more knee functional assessment.

Conclusions

Less-accurate quadriceps force output and greater hamstring coactivation are associated with worse knee joint function following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and may contribute to irregular knee joint loading and the onset or progression of knee osteoarthritis. Impairments in quadriceps force control and altered muscle activation strategies may be modifiable through neuromuscular training, and this is an area for future research.

Level of evidence

Case–control study, Level III.

     

Factors affecting anterior knee pain following anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of anterior knee pain in anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction and to identify critical factors affecting postoperative anterior knee pain development.

Methods

Subjects comprised 171 patients (171 knees) who underwent anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction with a follow-up period of ≥2?years. The procedure used bone-patellar tendon-bone plus gracilis tendon (BTB-G) in 56 knees, semitendinosus tendon (ST) in 71 knees, and ST-G in 44 knees. Clinical results and prevalence and severity of anterior knee pain were assessed at 3?months and 2?years postoperatively. Clinical variables influencing anterior knee pain development at each postoperative period were subjected to univariate analysis, followed by logistic regression analysis to identify risk factors for anterior knee pain.

Results

Overall prevalences of anterior knee pain at 3?months and 2?years postoperatively were 42.0 and 11.1%, respectively. Use of BTB-G graft represented the highest prevalence of anterior knee pain between the 3 different grafts (P?=?0.001); however, this statistical significance disappeared at 2?years postoperatively. Prevalence of postoperative extension deficit was significantly higher in anterior knee pain-positive cohort than in anterior knee pain-negative cohort at 3?months postoperatively. Level of quadriceps strength was significantly lower, and Lysholm score was significantly worse in anterior knee pain-positive cohort than in anterior knee pain-negative cohort at 2?years postoperatively. According to logistic regression analysis, knee extension deficit was a predisposing factor for the development of anterior knee pain at 3?months postoperatively (odds ratio, 2.76; P?=?0.004); however, there was no significant predisposing factor for anterior knee pain at 2?years postoperatively.

Conclusions

Knee extension deficit was an important predisposing factor for postoperative anterior knee pain in the early postoperative period, and anterior knee pain was associated with impaired quadriceps function and inferior subjective results over 2?years postoperatively. Early recovery of full extension may prevent postoperative development of anterior knee pain and achieve successful outcomes for ACL reconstruction.

Level of evidence

Retrospective comparative study, Level III.     

The effect of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction on the risk of knee reinjury

BACKGROUND: Although there is evidence that very active, young patients are better served with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, there is a lack of objective data demonstrating that future knee injury is prevented by these procedures. HYPOTHESIS: Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction protects against reinjury of the knee that would require reoperation. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. METHODS: A cohort of 6576 active-duty army personnel who had been hospitalized for anterior cruciate ligament injury from 1990 to 1996 were identified. Using the Total Army Injury and Health Outcomes Database, the authors followed these individuals for up to 9 years and collected clinical, demographic, and occupational data. These data were evaluated with bivariate and multivariable analyses to determine the effect of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction on the rate of knee reinjury that required operation. RESULTS: Of the 6576 study subjects, 3795 subjects (58%) underwent anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and 2781 (42%) did not. The rate of reoperation was significantly lower among the anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction group (4.90/100 person-years) compared with those treated conservatively (13.86/100 person-years; P < .0001). Proportional hazard regression analyses adjusted for age, race, sex, marital status, education, and physical activity level confirmed that anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction was protective against meniscal and cartilage reinjury (P < .0001). Secondary medial meniscal injury was more common than secondary lateral meniscal injury (P < .003). Younger age was the strongest predictor of failure of conservative management leading to late anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction protected against reoperation in this young, active population; younger subjects were more likely to require late anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Strong consideration should be given to anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction after anterior cruciate ligament injury in young, active individuals.     

Principles of bracing for the anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee

The preceding discussion has profiled the three different types of knee braces available on today's market. It has attempted to discuss the controversies surrounding these braces and to analyze the scientific data presented to date. Prophylactic braces have been shown to be ineffective in preventing knee injuries in their present-day design. Evidence has also shown that their use may even lead to increased knee injuries. On the other hand, rehabilitative braces do serve a useful purpose in regard to the operative and nonoperative treatment of ligamentous knee injuries. With their use in the application and control of joint motion, they are an important addition to the surgeon's armamentarium. One must keep in mind, however, that these braces provide little static anterior/posterior control and the hinge settings may not actually reflect true joint motion. Functional knee braces may play a role in the treatment of patients with pathologic laxity owing to an injury of the ACL. Combined with an adequate rehabilitation program and activity modification, these braces do limit excessive anterior tibial translation under low-loading conditions. However, under conditions of high loading these braces provide little or no resistance to anterior translation. Therefore, in most sporting activities, their efficacy is questionable. Knee bracing continues to be a complex and controversial topic in the field of orthopaedic surgery. The answers for the design of the "ideal" brace are being continually worked out and the need for more detailed, well-controlled studies continues to be great.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Our understanding of the structure and function of the anterior cruciate ligament has progressed rapidly over the past decade. Arthroscope-assisted anterior cruciate ligament replacement is a new procedure that allows isometric placement of the anterior cruciate ligament graft. Postoperative rehabilitation is enhanced by preservation of the extensor mechanism.     

Weight-bearing knee kinematics in subjects with two types of anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions

Weight-bearing knee kinematics in patients who received two types of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction were studied using a fluoroscopy-based three-dimensional measurement technique. Eleven patients with more than 1-year follow-up and good or excellent results participated in this study. Six subjects received anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a multiply folded semitendinosus and gracilis tendon graft, and five received combined intra- and extra-articular anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using the iliotibial tract. The step up/down activity of normal and operated knees was recorded using lateral fluoroscopy. A customized three-dimensional contour model was created from two orthogonal views of each knee and all six degrees of freedom of knee movement were determined using a model matching technique. Both the normal and the reconstructed knees exhibited posterior condylar translation and internal tibial rotation with knee flexion, consistent with previous reports of normal kinematics. There were no statistically significant differences in the axial rotations or lateral or medial condylar anterior/posterior translations between operated and normal knees or between the two groups of operated knees.     

Dynamic function after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with autologous patellar tendon

The purpose of this study was to dynamically assess the functional outcome of patients who had undergone successful anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using an autologous patellar tendon technique and to determine whether their dynamic knee function was related to quadriceps and hamstring muscle strength. The knee kinematics and kinetics of 22 subjects who had undergone anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (mean age, 27 +/- 11 years) and of 22 age- and sex-matched healthy control subjects were determined during various dynamic activities using a computerized motion analysis and force plate system. The differences in the sagittal plane angles and external moments between the two groups during light (walking), moderate (climbing and descending stairs), and higher-demand (jogging, jog and cut, jog and stop) activities were related to isokinetic strength measurements. Although patients who are asymptomatic and functioning well after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction can perform normally in light activities, higher-demand activities reveal persistent functional adaptations that require further study.     

Combined reconstruction for posterolateral rotatory instability with anterior cruciate ligament injuries of the knee

If posterolateral rotatory instability (PLRI) injury in patients with a torn anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is not diagnosed and treated, ACL reconstruction can fail. We retrospectively evaluated the clinical outcome after reconstructions between 2002 and 2007 of both the ACL and the posterolateral corner (PLC) in 44 knees with combined ACL and PLC injuries. The median follow-up duration was 49 months (range, 24–68 months). ACL reconstruction employed autogenous hamstring grafts from the ipsilateral knee. For grade II PLRI, a posterolateral corner sling through the fibular head was placed obliquely from the anteroinferior aspect to the posterosuperior aspect using autogenous hamstring grafts of the contralateral knee. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the OAK (Orthopadishe Arbeitsgruppe Knie) and IKDC (International Knee Documentation Committee) knee scoring systems. Anterior stability was measured on pull stress radiographs using a Telos stress device and the manual maximum displacement test using a KT-1000™ arthrometer with the knee flexed 30 degrees. PLRI was classified according to varus and rotational instability preoperatively and at final follow-up. Median OAK scores improved from 71 points (range, 48–86) to 93 points (range, 75–100). Satisfactory IKDC results were achieved in 39 knees (89%). As for anterior stability, as measured by anterior stress radiography, mean side-to-side displacement difference dropped significantly from 6.9 ± 1.9 preoperatively to 1.4 ± 1.1 mm at final follow-up. Forty patients (91%) had the same or better rotational stability compared to the normal side. Varus stress radiographs showed mean side-to-side displacement differences dropped from 1.8 ± 1.7 preoperatively to 0.4 ± 0.8 mm at final follow-up. Thus, chronic ACL deficiency is often accompanied by grade II PLRI and can be treated successfully by arthroscopic ACL reconstruction paired with posterolateral reconstruction employing a single sling through the fibular tunnel and a hamstring tendon autograft.     

膝关节镜前交叉韧带残端保留重建的疗效分析

目的 研究膝关节镜前交叉韧带残端保留重建的临床疗效.方法 回顾性分析2016年1月—2019年12月成都医学院第一附属医院骨科收治的86例前交叉韧带(ACL)损伤患者的病例资料,男性63例,女性23例;年龄22～52岁,平均38.8岁.均为运动损伤.按照是否保留ACL残端分为保留组(n=46)与不保留组(n=40),保...