An evidence-based assessment of federal guidelines for overweight and obesity as they apply to elderly persons

BACKGROUND: The US Clinical Guidelines on the Identification, Evaluation, and Treatment of Overweight and Obesity in Adults set the body mass index (BMI; weight in kilograms divided by the square of height in meters) of 25 as the upper limit of ideal weight for all adults regardless of age. However, the prognostic importance of overweight and obesity in elderly persons (>/=65 years) is controversial. We sought to analyze the guidelines in the context of currently available evidence that is relevant to older adults. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE for all English-language studies of the association between BMI and all-cause or cardiovascular mortality or coronary heart disease events from January 1966 through October 1999. Additional pertinent articles were identified through bibliographies of the MEDLINE articles. We selected studies for detailed review if they reported on the association between BMI and mortality for nonhospitalized subjects who were 65 years or older and had been followed up for at least 3 years. We controlled for age, smoking, and baseline health status. Of the 444 screened articles, 13 were selected to assess the guidelines. We extracted information regarding publication year, study design, population, recruitment period, follow-up duration, number of subjects, sex, age range, inclusion and exclusion criteria, and statistical models, including variables and end points. RESULTS: These data do not support the BMI range of 25 to 27 as a risk factor for all-cause and cardiovascular mortality among elderly persons. The results were not substantially different for men and women. Most studies showed a negative or no association between BMI and all-cause mortality. Three studies indicated overweight (BMI >/=27) as a significant prognostic factor for all-cause and cardiovascular mortality among 65- to 74-year-olds, and one study showed a significant positive association between overweight (BMI >/=28) and all-cause mortality among those 75 years or older. Higher BMI values were consistent with a smaller relative mortality risk in elderly persons compared with young and middle-aged populations. CONCLUSIONS: Federal guideline standards for ideal weight (BMI 18.7 to <25) may be overly restrictive as they apply to the elderly. Studies do not support overweight, as opposed to obesity, as conferring an excess mortality risk. Future guidelines should consider the evidence for specific age groups when establishing standards for healthy weight.     

Relation among body mass index, exercise training, and outcomes in chronic systolic heart failure

Exercise training (ET) in patients with heart failure (HF), as demonstrated in the Heart Failure: A Controlled Trial Investigating Outcomes of Exercise TraiNing (HF-ACTION), was associated with improved exercise tolerance and health status and a trend toward reduced mortality or hospitalization. The present analysis of the HF-ACTION cohort examined the effect of ET in overweight and obese subjects compared to normal weight subjects with HF. Of 2,331 subjects with systolic HF randomized to aerobic ET versus usual care in the HF-ACTION, 2,314 were analyzed to determine the effect of ET on all-cause mortality, hospitalizations, exercise parameters, quality of life, and body weight changes by subgroups of body mass index (BMI). The strata included normal weight (BMI 18.5 to 24.9 kg/m(2)), overweight (BMI 25.0 to 29.9 kg/m(2)), obese I (BMI 30 to 34.9 kg/m(2)), obese II (BMI 35 to 39.9 kg/m(2)), and obese III (BMI ≥40 kg/m(2)). At enrollment, 19.4% of subjects were normal weight, 31.3% were overweight, and 49.4% were obese. A greater BMI was associated with a nonsignificant increase in all-cause mortality or hospitalization. ET was associated with nonsignificant reductions in all-cause mortality and hospitalization in each weight category (hazard ratio 0.98, 0.95, 0.92, 0.89, and 0.86 in the normal weight, overweight, obese I, obese II, and obese III categories, respectively; all p >0.05). Modeled improvement in exercise capacity (peak oxygen consumption) and quality of life in the ET group was seen in all BMI categories. In conclusion, aerobic ET in subjects with HF was associated with a nonsignificant trend toward decreased mortality and hospitalization and a significant improvement in quality of life across the range of BMI categories.     

体质量指数与ARDS发病率的荟萃分析

目的 采用荟萃分析的方法系统评价体质量指数(body mass index,BMI)对ARDS发病率的影响.方法 以“obese or overweight or body mass index or BMI"和“ARDS or acuterespiratory distress syndrome”为关键词,计算机检索Pubmed、EMBASE、Cochrane databases、Wiley、Ovid、Medline、CNKI、VIP、Wan fang数据库中关于BMI与ARDS发病率的相关文献,运用RevMan 5.0及stata 10.0软件进行荟萃分析.结果 共纳入14篇文献,共29 962例患者.荟萃分析结果显示:肥胖与ARDS发病率明显相关(OR =1.70,95％ CI 1.44～2.00,P＜0.01).亚组分析结果显示:与正常体质量患者比较,低体质量(BMI≤18.5 kg/m2)及超重(BMI 25～29.9 kg/m2)患者ARDS发病率差异无统计学意义(OR =1.21,95％ CI 0.72～2.02,P=0.47和OR =1.21,95％CI0.94～1.55,P=0.13);肥胖患者(BMI 30-39.9 kg/m2和BMI≥30 kg/m2)ARDS发病率较正常体质量患者明显升高(BMI 30～39.9 kg/m2:OR=1.35,95％ CI 1.12～1.63,P=0.002;BMI≥30kg/m2:OR =1.75,95％ CI 1.42～2.15,P＜0.01);重度肥胖(BMI≥40 kg/m2)患者ARDS发病率是正常体质量患者的1.85倍(OR =1.85,95％ CI 1.40～2.44,P＜0.01).结论 BMI是ARDS发病的独立危险因素之一.随着BMI增加,ARDS患病率明显升高.     

Excess weight at time of presentation of myocardial infarction is associated with lower initial mortality risks but higher long-term risks including recurrent re-infarction and cardiac death

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the influence of elevated body mass index (BMI) on short- and long-term survival following acute myocardial infarction (AMI). BACKGROUND: Recent studies suggest an obesity survival paradox in individuals undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with better 30-day and 1-year outcomes in obese relative to normal weight patients. We tested a similar obesity paradox hypothesis following acute myocardial infarction. METHODS: Short- and long-term all-cause mortality, and risk of recurrent AMI were evaluated according to BMI status in 894 consecutive survivors of AMI <80 years of age admitted to the Mayo Clinic Coronary Care Unit between January 1, 1988 and April 16, 2001. Normal weight, overweight and obesity were defined as BMI <25, 25-29.9, and >30 kg/m(2), respectively. RESULTS: Overall mortality following hospital discharge was significantly lower in overweight and obese patients and was mostly attributable to lower 6-month mortality (adjusted HR = 0.47, P = 0.01 for BMI >25 kg/m(2)) relative to normal weight patients, while long-term mortality among 6-month survivors was similar in all 3 groups. The risk of recurrent AMI was higher in patients with BMI >25 kg/m(2) (adjusted HR = 2.30, P = 0.01). Overweight and obese patients were significantly more likely to die from cardiac rather than non-cardiac causes (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Following AMI, overweight and obese individuals although paradoxically protected from short-term death have a long-term mortality risk that is similar to normal weight individuals. Younger age at the time of initial infarction and fewer non-cardiovascular comorbidities presumably explain the short-lived obesity survival paradox following myocardial infarction.     

The obesity paradox: body mass index and outcomes in patients with heart failure

BACKGROUND: In the general population, obesity is associated with increased risk of adverse outcomes. However, studies of patients with chronic disease suggest that overweight and obese patients may paradoxically have better outcomes than lean patients. We sought to examine the association of body mass index (BMI) and outcomes in stable outpatients with heart failure (HF). METHODS: We analyzed data from 7767 patients with stable HF enrolled in the Digitalis Investigation Group trial. Patients were categorized using baseline BMI (calculated as weight in kilograms divided by the square of height in meters) as underweight (BMI <18.5), healthy weight (BMI, 18.5-24.9, overweight (BMI, 25.0-29.9), and obese (BMI > or =30.0). Risks associated with BMI groups were evaluated using multivariable Cox proportional hazards models over a mean follow-up of 37 months. RESULTS: Crude all-cause mortality rates decreased in a near linear fashion across successively higher BMI groups, from 45.0% in the underweight group to 28.4% in the obese group (P for trend <.001). After multivariable adjustment, overweight and obese patients were at lower risk for death (hazard ratio [HR], 0.88; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.80-0.96, and HR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.72-0.92, respectively), compared with patients at a healthy weight (referent). In contrast, underweight patients with stable HF were at increased risk for death (HR 1.21; 95% CI, 0.95-1.53). CONCLUSIONS: In a cohort of outpatients with established HF, higher BMIs were associated with lower mortality risks; overweight and obese patients had lower risk of death compared with those at a healthy weight. Understanding the mechanisms and impact of the "obesity paradox" in patients with HF is necessary before recommendations are made concerning weight and weight control in this population.     

Impact of body mass index on the five-year outcome of patients having percutaneous coronary interventions with drug-eluting stents

The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of body mass index (BMI) on clinical outcome of patients treated by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) using drug-eluting stents. Patients were stratified according to BMI as normal (<25 kg/m(2)), overweight (25 to 30 kg/m(2)), or obese (>30 kg/m(2)). At 5-year follow-up all-cause death, myocardial infarction, clinically justified target vessel revascularization (TVR), and definite stent thrombosis were assessed. A complete dataset was available in 7,427 patients, of which 45%, 22%, and 33% were classified according to BMI as overweight, obese, and normal, respectively. Mean age of patients was significantly older in those with a normal BMI (p <0.05). Incidence of diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and dyslipidemia increased as BMI increased (p <0.05). Significantly higher rates of TVR (15.3% vs 12.8%, p = 0.02) and early stent thrombosis (1.5% vs 0.9%, p = 0.04) were observed in the obese compared to the normal BMI group. No significant difference among the 3 BMI groups was observed for the composite of death/myocardial infarction/TVR or for definite stent thrombosis at 5 years, whereas the normal BMI group was at higher risk for all-cause death at 5 years (obese vs normal BMI, hazard ratio 0.74, confidence interval 0.53 to 0.99, p = 0.05; overweight vs normal BMI, hazard ratio 0.73, confidence interval 0.59 to 0.94, p = 0.01) in the multivariate Cox proportional hazard model. Age resulted in a linearly dependent covariate with BMI in the all-cause 5-year mortality multivariate model (p = 0.001). In conclusion, the "obesity paradox" observed in 5-year all-cause mortality could be explained by the higher rate of elderly patients in the normal BMI group and the existence of colinearity between BMI and age. However, obese patients had a higher rate of TVR and early stent thrombosis and a higher rate of other risk factors such as diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and hypercholesterolemia.     

Body mass index and colorectal cancer prognosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Colorectal cancer is one of the most common cancers worldwide. However, it is unclear what influence body mass index (BMI) has on colorectal cancer prognosis. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies to examine the association of BMI with colorectal cancer outcomes. We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE databases from inception to February 2015 and references of identified articles. We selected observational studies that reported all-cause mortality, colorectal cancer-specific mortality, recurrence and disease-free survival according to BMI category. Random-effects meta-analyses were conducted to combine estimates. We included 18 observational studies. Obese patients had an increased risk of all-cause mortality [relative risk (RR) 1.14; 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.07–1.21], cancer-specific mortality (RR 1.14; 95 % CI 1.05–1.24), recurrence (RR 1.07; 95 % CI 1.02–1.13) and worse disease-free survival (RR 1.07; 95 % CI 1.01–1.13). Underweight patients also had an increased risk of all-cause mortality (RR 1.43; 95 % CI 1.26–1.62), cancer-specific mortality (RR 1.50; 95 % CI 1.20–1.87), recurrence (RR 1.13; 95 % CI 1.05–1.21) and worse disease-free survival (RR 1.27; 95 % CI 1.13–1.43). Overweight patients had no increased risk for any of the outcomes studied. Both obese and underweight patients with colorectal cancer have an increased risk of all-cause mortality, cancer-specific mortality, disease recurrence and worse disease-free survival compared to normal weight patients.     

Prevalence and correlates of overweight and obesity among older adults: findings from the Canadian National Population Health Survey

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of obesity among elderly persons in industrialized countries ranges from 15% to 20%. Little is known about variations of overweight within subgroups of the elderly population. This study examined the factors associated with overweight and obesity among older men and women. METHODS: Data for 12,823 community-dwelling persons aged 65 and older from the 1996-1997 Canadian National Population Health Survey were examined. Predictors of overweight (body mass index [BMI] = 25.0-29.9 kg/m2) and obesity (BMI = >30 kg/m2) relative to normal weight (BMI = 20.0-24.9 kg/m2) were examined using logistic regression analyses. Analyses were stratified by gender. The predictor variables included age, education, marital status, place of birth, region, smoking status, alcohol use, chronic conditions, physical activity, functional limitations, self-rated health, social support, and psychological distress. RESULTS: Overall, 39% and 13% of Canadian older adults were classified as overweight and obese, respectively. Some of the risk factors for overweight were male gender, low education, being married, Canadian born, residence in the Atlantic provinces, no use of alcohol, comorbidity, physical inactivity, and limited functional status. Risk factors for obesity were similar to those for overweight except for being unmarried; American, European, and Australian born; lower and higher levels of alcohol use; poor self-rated health; and psychological distress. CONCLUSIONS: The results could lead to more effective weight-control interventions that are designed to promote increased physical activity and healthy eating habits among obese older individuals.     

Combined effect of obesity and cardio-metabolic abnormality on the risk of cardiovascular disease: A meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies

Background

Cardiovascular risk is inconsistent in the normal-weight, overweight, and obese individuals due to metabolic abnormality. We aimed to investigate combined effects of obesity and metabolic abnormality on the risk of cardiovascular disease and mortality.

Methods

The MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane library, and references of relevant original articles prior to May 2013 were searched for prospective studies investigating cardiovascular risk and death associated with combined effects of obesity and metabolic syndrome or insulin resistance. Pooled relative risks (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using random-effects or fixed-effect models when appropriate.

Results

Fourteen perspective studies with a total of 299,059 participants and 12,125 cases of incident CVD, 2130 cases of CVD death, and 7071 cases of all-cause death were included in the meta-analysis. Compared with healthy normal-weight individuals, metabolically healthy overweight (MHOW) and obese (MHOB) individuals showed increased risk for CVD events, which appeared much stronger during the long-term follow-up period of > 15 years, with pooled RR of 1.47 (95% CI 1.37–1.58) in MHOW and 2.00 (95% CI 1.79–2.24) in MHOB. Normal-weight but metabolically abnormal individuals were at increased risk for CVD (pooled RR 1.81, 95% CI 1.56–2.10), CVD-related death (pooled RR 1.55, 95% CI 1.16–2.08), and all-cause death (pooled RR 1.27, 95% CI 1.10–1.47). Metabolically abnormal obese individuals were at the highest risk for CVD and mortality.

Conclusion

Individuals with metabolic abnormality, although at normal-weight, had an increased risk of CVD and mortality. Healthy overweight and obese persons had higher risk, which refuted the notion that metabolically healthy obese phenotype is a benign condition.     

Body mass index and all‐cause mortality in older adults: A scoping review of observational studies

In older age, body composition changes as fat mass increases and redistributes. Therefore, the current body mass index (BMI) classification may not accurately reflect risk in older adults (65+). This study aimed to review the evidence on the association between BMI and all‐cause mortality in older adults and specifically, the findings regarding overweight and obese BMI. A systematic search of the OVID MEDLINE and Embase databases was conducted between 2013 and September 2018. Observational studies examining the association between BMI and all‐cause mortality within a community‐dwelling population aged 65+ were included. Seventy‐one articles were included. Studies operationalized BMI categorically (n = 60), continuously (n = 8) or as a numerical change/group transition (n = 7). Reduced risk of mortality was observed for the overweight BMI class compared with the normal BMI class (hazard ratios [HR] ranged 0.41‐0.96) and for class 1 or 2 obesity in some studies. Among studies examining BMI change, increases in BMI demonstrated lower mortality risks compared with decreases in BMI (HR: 0.83‐0.95). Overweight BMI classification or a higher BMI value may be protective with regard to all‐cause mortality, relative to normal BMI, in older adults. These findings demonstrate the potential need for age‐specific BMI cut‐points in older adults.     

Effects of Body Mass Index on Clinical Outcomes in Female Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Drug-Eluting Stents: Results From a Patient-Level Pooled Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Objectives

This study sought to investigate the effect of different body mass index (BMI) categories on clinical outcomes in female patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and drug-eluting stents.

Maternal obesity and risk of cesarean delivery: a meta-analysis

Despite numerous studies reporting an increased risk of cesarean delivery among overweight or obese compared with normal weight women, the magnitude of the association remains uncertain. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis of the current literature to provide a quantitative estimate of this association. We identified studies from three sources: (i) a PubMed search of relevant articles published between January 1980 and September 2005; (ii) reference lists of publications selected from the search; and (iii) reference lists of review articles published between 2000 and 2005. We included cohort designed studies that reported obesity measures reflecting pregnancy body mass, had a normal weight comparison group, and presented data allowing a quantitative measurement of risk. We used a Bayesian random effects model to perform the meta-analysis and meta-regression. Thirty-three studies were included. The unadjusted odd ratios of a cesarean delivery were 1.46 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.34-1.60], 2.05 (95% CI: 1.86-2.27) and 2.89 (95% CI: 2.28-3.79) among overweight, obese and severely obese women, respectively, compared with normal weight pregnant women. The meta-regression found no evidence that these estimates were affected by selected study characteristics. Our findings provide a quantitative estimate of the risk of cesarean delivery associated with high maternal body mass.     

The association of body weight and anthropometry with mortality in elderly men: the Honolulu Heart Program.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the relationship of body weight and anthropometry to all-cause mortality in older men. DESIGN: A prospective cohort study of 3741 elderly Japanese-American men, enrolled in the Honolulu Heart Program. For this report, the follow-up began at baseline examinations (1991-1993), when the men were aged 71-93 y. MEASUREMENTS: Variables of interest were body mass index (BMI), waist-to-hip ratio (WHR), and the sum of the subscapular and triceps skinfold thickness. Possible confounders included age, education, physical activity index, smoking, alcohol consumption, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, cholesterol, glucose and insulin concentrations. RESULTS: After an average of 4.5 y of follow-up, 766 men (21%) had died. Higher BMI was associated with lower adjusted mortality risks (relative risk (RR)) highest vs lowest quintile-based category = 0.5, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.4-0.6, P-trend < 0.001). Results were independent of WHR, and did not change after excluding current and former smokers or those who died within one year of follow-up. The relation between WHR and mortality appeared to be U-shaped, but after adjustment for BMI, a higher WHR steadily increased the risk of dying (RR highest vs lowest category = 1.5, 95%CI: 1.1-2.0, P-trend=0.004). Especially in subjects with a high BMI, there was a positive association between WHR and mortality. The results for skinfold thickness were similar to the results for BMI, but less strong. CONCLUSIONS: In older men, BMI and skinfold thickness showed a consistent inverse association with mortality, even after accounting for early mortality. The WHR, on the other hand, was positively related to mortality, especially when BMI was high. Thus, excess abdominal fat mass (FM) warrants closer concern than being overweight, in terms of affecting mortality in the elderly.     

Body mass index, prognosis and mode of death in chronic heart failure: results from the Valsartan Heart Failure Trial

AIMS: To assess the relationship between body mass index (BMI), mortality and mode of death in chronic heart failure (CHF) patients; to define the shape of the relationship between BMI and mortality. METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed a post-hoc analysis of 5010 patients from the Valsartan Heart Failure Trial. The end-points of the study were all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. Mortality rate was 27.2% in underweight patients (BMI<22 kg/m2), 21.7% in normal weight patients (BMI 22-24.9 kg/m2), 17.9% in overweight patients (BMI 25-29.9 kg/m2) and 16.5% in obese patients (BMI>30 kg/m2) (p<0.0001). The rates of non-cardiovascular death did not differ among groups. The risk of death due to progressive heart failure was 3.4-fold higher in the underweight than in the obese patients (p<0.0001). Normal weight, overweight and obese patients had lower risk of death as compared with underweight patients (p=0.019, HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.61-0.96; p=0.0005, HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.55-0.84; p=0.003, HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.52-0.88, respectively) independently of symptoms, ventricular function, beta-blocker use, C-reactive protein and brain natriuretic peptide levels. CONCLUSIONS: In CHF patients a higher BMI is associated with a better prognosis independently of other clinical variables. The relationship between mortality and BMI is monotonically decreasing.     

Influence of body mass index on extent of coronary atherosclerosis and cardiac events in a cohort of patients at risk of coronary artery disease

Background and Aim

To estimate if a meaningful relationship exists between body mass index (BMI) and the entity of coronary atherosclerosis, coronary events and mortality in a cohort of consecutive patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD).

Methods and results

In this prospective study, we enrolled 1299 consecutive patients (905 [69.7%] males) who had undergone coronary angiography. Our sample consisted of 477 patients (36.8%) of normal weight; 567 (43.6%) overweight and 255 (19.6%) obese, according to the WHO classification. Conventional cardiovascular risk factors, BMI, endothelial function and subclinical inflammation were studied. Different angiographic CAD scores were used to quantify coronary atherosclerotic burden. In overweight and obese patients, respect to normal weight population, there is a higher prevalence of hypertension, hypercholesterolemia and diabetes mellitus, but BMI was not significantly associated with greater extent of coronary atherosclerosis. At follow-up (mean: 40; range: 24-82 months) obese and overweight patients showed a higher incidence of coronary events compared to the normal weight population (74.9% [obese] versus 62.7% [overweight] versus 53.2% [normal weight]; adjusted relative risk [obese versus overweight]: 1.08 [95% confidence interval: 1.02-1.23]; P < 0.05; and adjusted RR [obese versus normal weight]: 1.17 [95% CI: 1.10-1.42], P < 0.01). Mortality from cardiac events was not significant within the categories. The Cox regression model showed flow mediated dilation (P < 0.0001), high-sensitive C reactive protein (P = 0.022) and BMI (P = 0.045) as independent predictors of acute coronary events.

Conclusion

BMI is not associated with the extent of coronary atherosclerosis and mortality. The higher incidence of coronary events in obese subjects is only partly explained by conventional associated risk factors. Impaired endothelial function and sub-clinical inflammation could be involved in this association but BMI itself is related to cardiovascular events suggesting that other unknown (or not considered) pathways are involved.     

Explaining the sex difference in coronary heart disease mortality among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Most studies suggest that diabetes is a stronger coronary heart disease (CHD) risk factor for women than men, but few have adjusted their results for classic CHD risk factors: age, hypertension, total cholesterol level, and smoking. OBJECTIVE: To establish an accurate estimate of the odds ratio for fatal and nonfatal CHD due to diabetes in both men and women. METHODS: We compared the summary odds ratio for CHD mortality and the absolute rates of CHD mortality in men and women with diabetes. We searched the MEDLINE and Cochrane Collaboration databases and bibliographies of relevant articles and consulted experts. Studies that included a nondiabetic control group and provided sex-specific adjusted results for CHD mortality, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and cardiovascular or all-cause mortality were included. Of 4578 articles identified, 232 contained primary data, and 182 were excluded. Two reviewers recorded data on study characteristics, quality, and outcomes from 50 studies. RESULTS: Sixteen studies met all inclusion criteria. In unadjusted and age-adjusted analyses, odds of CHD death were higher in women than men with diabetes. From 8 prospective studies, the multivariate-adjusted summary odds ratio for CHD mortality due to diabetes was 2.3 (95% confidence interval, 1.9-2.8) for men and 2.9 (95% confidence interval, 2.2-3.8) for women. There were no significant sex differences in the adjusted risk associated with diabetes for CHD mortality, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and cardiovascular or all-cause mortality. Absolute CHD death rates were higher for diabetic men than women in every age strata except the very oldest. CONCLUSIONS: The excess relative risk of CHD mortality in women vs men with diabetes was absent after adjusting for classic CHD risk factors, but men had more CHD deaths attributable to diabetes than women.     

Body mass index and body girths as predictors of mortality in black and white women.

BACKGROUND--The high prevalence of obesity in black women has been hypothesized to contribute to higher rates of coronary heart disease and total mortality. Investigators have recently refined the study of obesity by differentiating anatomic patterns of the physical location of adipose tissue on the body. We examined fat patterning as a predictor of mortality in black women. METHODS--Body mass index (BMI) and body girths were examined as predictors of all-cause and coronary heart disease mortality during 25 to 28 years of follow-up in black and white women in the Charleston Heart Study. RESULTS--The BMI was associated with all-cause and coronary heart disease mortality in white, but not black, women. After controlling for differences in BMI, the risk of all-cause mortality was greater in white women with larger chest and abdominal girths, while midarm girths were inversely associated with mortality. The hazard at the 85th percentile relative to the 15th percentile of abdomen/midarm ratio was 1.44 in models that included BMI, education, and smoking as covariates. In black women, the girths were not predictive of either all-cause or coronary heart disease mortality. CONCLUSIONS--The failure of BMI and fat patterning to predict mortality in black women challenges previously held assumptions regarding the role of overweight in the higher mortality experienced by black women.     

Relation of body mass index to outcome in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease

Increased body mass index (BMI), a parameter of total body fat content, is associated with an increased mortality in the general population. However, recent studies have shown a paradoxic relation between BMI and mortality in specific patient populations. This study investigated the association of BMI with long-term mortality in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. In a retrospective cohort study of 5,950 patients (mean age 61 +/- 13 years; 67% men), BMI, cardiovascular risk markers (age, gender, hypertension, diabetes, current smoking, angina pectoris, old myocardial infarction, heart failure, hypercholesterolemia, and previous coronary revascularization), and outcome were noted. The patient population was categorized as underweight, normal, overweight, and obese based on BMI according to the World Health Organization classification. Mean follow-up time was 6 +/- 2.6 years. Incidences of long-term mortality in underweight, normal, overweight, and obese were 39%, 35%, 24%, and 20%, respectively. In a multivariate analysis model, the hazard ratio (HR) for mortality in underweight patients was 2.4 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.7 to 3.7). Overweight and obese patients had a significantly lower mortality than patients with a normal BMI (HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.6 to 0.7, for overweight; HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.5 to 0.7, for obese patients). In conclusion, BMI is inversely related to long-term mortality in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. A lower BMI was an independent predictor of long-term mortality, whereas an improved outcome was observed in overweight and obese patients.     

Obesity is associated with lower mortality risk in elderly diabetic subjects: the Casale Monferrato study

The relationship between obesity and mortality in people with type 2 diabetes has not been definitely assessed. We have examined this issue in a well-characterized population-based cohort of Mediterranean diabetic people. Standardized anthropometric data from the population-based Casale Monferrato Study have been prospectively analyzed. The cohort included 1,475 people (62.6% aged ≥65 years) who had been recruited in 1991 and followed-up to December 31, 2006. Cox proportional hazards modeling was employed to estimate the independent associations between all-cause and cardiovascular mortality and BMI. Out of 1,475 people, 972 deaths occurred during a 15-year follow-up. Cox regression analyses showed that with respect to BMI <24.2 kg/m², values of 30.0 kg/m² and over were associated with lower all-cause and cardiovascular mortality risk (HR = 0.68, 95% CI 0.56–0.85, P for trend = 0.001; HR = 0.59, 0.44–0.80, P for trend = 0.002), independently of classical and new risk factors. As interaction between age and BMI was significant, we performed a stratified analysis by age, providing evidence that our finding was entirely due to a significant protective effect of BMI of 30.0 kg/m² and over in the elderly (all-cause mortality HR = 0.75, 95% CI 0.58–0.96; cardiovascular mortality HR = 0.67, 95% CI 0.45–0.95). In contrast, obesity was not significantly associated with mortality risk in diabetic subjects aged <65 years. Results were confirmed even excluding from the analysis individuals who died within 2 years of follow-up, smokers and those with CHD. In Mediterranean diabetic people aged ≥65 years, obesity is significantly associated with lower 15-year mortality risk. In contrast, it was not significantly associated with mortality risk in diabetic subjects aged <65 years. As more than two-thirds of people with type 2 diabetes are elderly, our findings, if confirmed, could have clinical implications.     

Association between body mass index and erosive esophagitis: a meta-analysis

AIM: To conduct a meta-analysis to estimate the determinants of the association between erosive esophagitis (EE) and body mass index (BMI).METHODS: We identified the studies using PubMed. Studies were selected for analysis based on certain inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data were extracted from each study on the basis of predefined items. Meta-analyses were performed to verify the risk factors, such as obesity and gender.RESULTS: Twenty-one studies were included in this systematic review. These studies demonstrated an association between increasing BMI and the presence of EE [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.35-1.88, overweight, odds ratio (OR) = 1.60, P value homogeneity = 0.003, 95% CI: 1.65-2.55, obese, OR = 2.05, P < 0.01]. The heterogeneity disappeared by stratifying for gender. No publication bias was observed in this meta-analysis by the Egger method.CONCLUSION: This analysis demonstrates a positive association between BMI and the presence of EE, especially in males. The risk seems to progressively increase with increasing weight.