经尿道前列腺钬激光剜除术与双极等离子剜除术治疗良性前列腺增生的Meta分析

目的:比较经尿道前列腺钬激光剜除术(HoLEP)与经尿道前列腺双极等离子剜除术(PKEP)治疗良性前列腺增生(BPH)的安全性和疗效性。方法:计算机检索PubMed、EMbase、Cochrane of Library、Web of Science、Scopus、ScienceDirector、Wiley Online...     

经尿道前列腺钬激光剜除术治疗良性前列腺增生效果分析

目的 探讨经尿道前列腺钬激光剜除术(HoLEP)治疗良性前列腺增生(BPH)的安全性和临床效果.方法 回顾性分析周口永兴医院泌尿外科于2020-01—2021-04收治的84例BPH患者的临床资料.分为HoLEP组(43例)和经尿道等离子前列腺切除术组(PKRP组,41例).比较2组术中情况和术后临床指标,统计并发症发...     

经尿道摩西钬激光前列腺剜除术治疗良性前列腺增生的临床研究

目的探讨经尿道摩西钬激光前列腺剜除术在良性前列腺增生(BPH)患者中的应用效果,旨在为BPH患者快速康复提供更好的手术治疗方案。方法应用前瞻性随机双盲对照研究法,选取2018年8月至2019年11月在本院住院的80例BPH患者作为研究对象,将其随机分为两组,对照组(40例)采用经尿道100 W钬激光前列腺剜除术,研究组(40例)采用经尿道摩西钬激光前列腺剜除术,手术均由同一医师完成,术式为改良钬激光前列腺剜除术(三叶十七步法);比较两组的前列腺剜除时间、术中出血量、术后3 h血清钠下降程度、术后拔除尿管时间、住院时间,统计两组患者术前、术后3个月的最大尿流率(Qmax)、残余尿量(PVR)、国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS),观察学习曲线等指标。结果研究组的前列腺剜除时间、术中出血量、术后拔除尿管时间、住院时间比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),两组患者手术前后的血清钠变化差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);两组术后3个月的Qmax、PVR、IPSS均较治疗前显著改善(P<0.05),但术后组间比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);两组患者术中均无膀胱损伤及TUR综合征患者,无输血患者,无术后尿道外口狭窄患者,术后均无严重并发症;学习曲线方面,经尿道摩西钬激光前列腺剜除术的学习曲线较短。结论经尿道摩西钬激光前列腺剜除术安全性高、风险较小、疗效良好、术后康复快,且学习曲线较短,表现出较高的临床应用价值。     

经尿道钬激光前列腺剜除术治疗良性前列腺增生症临床价值研究

目的 探讨经尿道钬激光前列腺剜除术(HoLEP)对良性前列腺增生(BPH)患者的临床应用价值.方法 回顾性分析2017-11—2019-09内黄县中医院泌尿外科行手术治疗的80例BPH患者的临床资料.根据手术方式分为HoLEP组和经尿道前列腺电切组(TURP组),每组40例.比较2组患者的基线资料、术中情况,以及术后临...     

经尿道钬激光前列腺剜除术治疗BPH的Meta分析

目的:用Meta分析的方法评价经尿道钬激光前列腺剜除术(HoLEP)和经尿道前列腺电切术(TURP)/开放手术(OP)治疗良性前列腺增生(BPH)所致膀胱出口梗阻(BOO)的疗效和安全性. 方法:计算机检索Medline、Cochrane临床对照试验中心数据库、Embase、万方数据库和中国生物医学文献数据库,手工检索...     

经尿道钬激光前列腺剜除术后尿失禁的临床特征和相关因素分析

目的:探讨经尿道钬激光前列腺剜除术(HoLEP)术后尿失禁的临床特征和危险因素。方法:回顾性分析2016年1月至2018年12月本院收治的375例良性前列腺增生行HoLEP治疗患者的临床和随访资料,总结术后尿失禁的发生率、类型、严重程度和恢复情况,分析影响术后尿失禁的相关因素。结果:本组HoLEP术后尿失禁总体发生率为...     

经尿道钬激光前列腺剜除术治疗前列腺增生

目的评价经尿道钬激光前列腺剜除和前列腺组织粉碎术治疗良性前列腺增生（BPH）的临床效果,探讨手术操作技巧及并发症的预防。方法应用100 W钬激光器和组织粉碎器对45例BPH患者实施经尿道钬激光前列腺剜除（HoLEP）和组织粉碎术。术前国际前列腺症状评分（IPSS）为15-32分,平均24.0分,最大尿流率（Qmax）为4-15 mL/s,平均8.4 mL/s,膀胱残余尿为60-246 mL,平均115 mL。结果41例行HoLEP手术成功。手术时间50-200 min,平均105 min,获得前列腺组织30-85 g,平均48.6 g,其中输血5例,膀胱黏膜或膀胱壁损伤5例,尿失禁1例,尿道狭窄3例。保留导尿时间3-7 d,平均4.3 d。术后35例获随访3个月,IPSS降至3-10分,平均5.2分（P〈0.01）,Qmax升至18-25 mL/s,平均22.4 mL/s（P〈0.01）,膀胱残余尿为0-68 mL,平均26 mL（P〈0.01）。结论经尿道钬激光剜除前列腺组织损伤小,术中出血少,并发症少,疗效可靠。HoLEP学习曲线较长,应注意手术技巧的掌握,减少并发症的发生。     

良性前列腺增生合并轻度尿道狭窄的治疗

本文回顾性分析我院收治的21例良性前列腺增生(BPH)合并轻度尿道狭窄患者的临床资料。21例行前列腺手术时, 先行尿道扩张或尿道内切开。12例行经尿道前列腺钬激光剜除术(HoLEP),术后3例出现严重尿道狭窄而接受再次手术, 9例排尿通畅;4例逆向射精;2例暂时性尿失禁。9例行腹腔镜前列腺剜除术, 术后均排尿通畅, 无严重尿道狭窄、暂时性尿失禁和逆向射精。腹腔镜前列腺剜除术治疗合并轻度尿道狭窄的BPH较HoLEP能降低尿道狭窄的风险。     

经尿道前列腺双极剜除术治疗症状性BPH的学习曲线研究(附100例报告)

目的:总结连续实施经尿道前列腺双极剜除术治疗症状性BPH的临床安全性、疗效及学习曲线。方法:回顾性分析自2010年1月～2011年1月行经尿道前列腺双极剜除术治疗100例症状性BPH患者围手术期及随访资料,以中转为普通双极TURP比例剜除、剜除效率等指标评估学习曲线。结果:共83例患者完成经尿道前列腺双极剜除术,无中转开放手术。术前前列腺体积(74.8±27.05)ml,血红蛋白(131.72±8.01)g/L,IP-SS评分(25.37±3.55)分,QOL(4.33±0.91)分,术前最大尿流率(Qmax)(6.54±2.95)ml/s,手术时间(117.5±37.22)min,术后3天血红蛋白(125.03±6.64)g/ml,术后留置尿管时间(3.3±1.9)d,术前与术后血清钠无明显变化。6个月后剩余前列腺体积(35.29±17.57)ml,Qmax(21.34±4.09)ml/s,IPSS评分(9.66±2.64)分,QOL(2.31±0.92)分。术后1个月内压力性尿失禁8例,均于术后3个月恢复;尿道外口狭窄发生3例,无后尿道及球部尿道狭窄发生,无膀胱颈挛缩发生。学习曲线中,Qmax、IPSS和QOL评分随手术例次增加无明显差异,但中转为普通双极TURP在经历30例后明显减少,剜除效率随手术例数累积明显提高,约50例次后处于平台期。结论:经尿道前列腺双极剜除术可安全用于症状性BPH的治疗,具有良好的临床疗效。其学习曲线在经历30例后可安全实施,50例后技术逐渐成熟并进入平台期。     

钬激光前列腺剜除术后的尿道康复

良性前列腺增生(BPH)是中老年男性的常见疾病,而钬激光前列腺剜除术(HoLEP)是解除增生前列腺组织的重要方法,但是术后的并发症仍然影响着患者生活质量与手术效果。我中心经过10年的临床实践和多中心的数据分析,针对接受HoLEP的患者提出了"尿道康复"的理念,主要包括术后的疼痛康复、排尿康复、控尿康复、性功能康复;建立了一套术后恢复程序,加速了患者术后康复。     

Enucleation of the prostate: An anatomical perspective

Among transurethral surgery for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), anatomical endoscopic enucleation of the prostate (AEEP) differs from conventional transurethral surgery as it adopts the same enucleation principle as open surgery. AEEP is known as an effective and safe surgical method. However, the learning curve is steep because the surgical anatomy is different from that of conventional transurethral surgery. If information on surgical anatomy related to enucleation is enriched and surgical standardisation is achieved, the learning curve will be shortened and AEEP will become more widespread. The concept of AEEP has been developed based on the surgical techniques obtained from holmium laser enucleation of prostate (HoLEP). The original surgical technique of HoLEP is a three-lobe technique. At the 12 o'clock position at the prostatic apex, the boundary of the prostate capsule is unclear. Separating anterior prostatic tissue from the prostatic capsule while preserving the sphincter in the apical area is one of the biggest challenges in AEEP. During the AEEP procedure, an accurate understanding of the surgical anatomy of the capsular plane, bladder neck, apical sphincteric area and blood vessels is important. In this article, literature on the anatomy related to enucleation in AEEP, mainly HoLEP, is reviewed and discussed.     

前列腺增生手术:剜除好还是切除好?(附光盘)

钬激光前列腺剜除术作为经尿道前列腺剜除术的经典术式之一,拥有较好的安全性、疗效及低复发率。但以往三叶法剜除的学习曲线延长了泌尿外科医生的掌握时间。而改良后的6点通道法结合逆向推拨术,大大缩短了学习曲线,对该术式的推广起到了重要的作用。     

In 2013, Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (HoLEP) May Be the New ‘Gold Standard’

In this review article, we assess why holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) has become an important treatment modality for benign prostatic hypertrophy (BPH). Meta-analysis comparing HoLEP with both open prostatectomy (OP) and transurethral resection of prostate (TURP) shows TURP to be as effective with less morbidity. More recently, HoLEP has long-term durability data confirming a very low reoperation rate. This article investigates how previous hurdles to the widespread uptake of HoLEP have been overcome. Recent literature shows that the learning curve is actually similar to many other current urological procedures, and that the efficiency of HoLEP is equal to that of other surgical procedures. HoLEP is also beneficial in the growing population of men on anticoagulation who require treatment for BPH. Finally, HoLEP is the only laser treatment for BPH with level 1 evidence and endorsement in both the American Urological Association (AUA) and European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines.     

Comparison of TURP, TUVRP, and HoLEP

Since the first transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) was performed by Guyon at the Necker Hospital in Paris in 1901, this treatment modality has replaced open prostatectomy as the procedure of choice for more than 95% of patients. TURP has been used in surgical treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and remains the gold standard treatment. Transurethral vapor resection of the prostate (TUVRP) and holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) are new treatment modalities for the treatment of BPH. Each procedure has its own advantages and disadvantages. Availability of instruments, surgical expertise, and specific indications for a particular procedure are of utmost importance for successful outcome, with minimal morbidity. TURP can be either monopolar or bipolar, using thin or thick loop. Bipolar TURP is associated with less bleeding and less chances of dilutional hyponatremia. TUVRP, using a thick wedge loop, causes vaporization and resection of the prostate, and is associated with less bleeding and short operative time. HoLEP is another effective alternative for the surgical treatment of BPH. The holmium laser possesses the ideal combination of cutting and coagulation; however, it has a learning curve.     

Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) in patients with continuous oral anticoagulation: first reported cases in Japan

Oral anticoagulation (OA) has been considered as a strict contraindication to transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). In recent years, some studies have shown that holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) has less blood loss compared to TURP. Thus we have performed HoLEP in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) under continuous OA from September 2009, and herein we report our first nine cases. Patients received HoLEP by a single surgeon at our institution. HoLEP was performed successfully in all patients. The mean times to complete enucleation and morcellation were 48.2 and 5.1 minutes, respectively. The mean tissue weight of enucleation was 37 grams. The mean hemoglobin and sodium loss after HoLEP were 1.7 g/dl and 1.3 mEq/L, respectively, and the catheterization time was 1.6 days. Blood transfusion, clot retention or transurethral resection syndrome were not observed in any cases. HoLEP has excellent hemostatic properties, and is a safe and effective procedure for patients with symptomatic BPH under the condition of continuous OA.     

Critical review of lasers in benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH)

? Laser treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia has challenged transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) due to advances in laser technology, better understanding of tissue-laser interactions and growing clinical experience. ? Various lasers have been introduced including neodymium: yttrium aluminium garnet (YAG), holmium (Ho):YAG, potassium titanyl phosphate:YAG, thulium(Tm) and diode laser. Based on the different wave-length dependent laser-prostatic tissue interactions, the main techniques are coagulation, vaporization, resection and enucleation. ? The present review aims to help urologists to distinguish and to critically evaluate the role of different laser methods in the treatment by using an evidence-based approach. It also details further evidence for use in specific patient groups (in retention, on anticoagulation) and addresses the issues of cost and learning curve. ? Coagulation-based techniques have been abandoned; holmium ablation/resection of the prostate has been superseded by the enucleation technique Ho-laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP). The short-term efficacy of the emerging laser treatments such as diode and Tm prostatectomy has been suggested by low quality studies. HoLEP and photoselective vaporization of the prostate (PVP) represent valid clinical alternatives to TURP. HoLEP is the most rigorously analysed laser technique with durable efficacy for any prostate size and low early and late morbidity. PVP has grown in acceptance and popularity but long-term results from high quality studies are pending.     

Operative Therapie der benignen Prostatahyperplasie

Open simple prostatectomy is not only the oldest but also the most effective treatment option for benign prostatic obstruction. Laser enucleation has been established as a transurethral minimally invasive alternative especially but not exclusively for large volume prostates. To date two laser systems, holmium:YAG laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) and thulium:YAG laser vapoenucleation of the prostate (ThuVEP) have been established. Both treatment modalities have similarities in terms of wavelength and surgical technique but differ in the type of energy released (pulsed versus continuous wave). The HoLEP and ThuVEP procedures lead to a significant improvement in symptoms, quality of life, urinary flow and post-void residual urine. Surgery-related morbidity, especially bleeding complications is significantly reduced with laser enucleation. For HoLEP the durability of the results was shown for a follow-up interval of up to 10 years while for ThuVEP the follow-up interval reached 18 months due to the shorter time since clinical implementation of this method.     

Minimally Invasive Surgical Treatments for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

Although transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) is considered to be the reference standard for minimally invasive surgical treatment (MIST) of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) due to benign prostatic obstruction (BPO), it is associated with a noteworthy rate of complication. Transurethral microwave thermotherapy (TUMT), transurethral needle ablation (TUNA), and laser prostatectomy (including holmium laser enucleation of the prostate [HoLEP] and potassium titanyl phosphate [KTP] laser) represent the best studied and most accepted MISTs. TUNA and TUMT are simple and safe techniques that can be performed under local anaesthesia in a significant number of patients. Both MISTs significantly improve functional outcomes with respect to baseline values, but they do not reach the same level of efficacy and long-lasting success as TURP. They are, however, superior to TURP in terms of associated morbidity and anaesthetic requirements. HoLEP and KTP have demonstrated similar efficacy and anaesthetic requirements to TURP. Additionally, both lasers are prostate-size independent and seem to have better safety profiles, including shorter catheterisation and hospitalisation time. Yet HoLEP is associated with a steeper learning curve, a higher initial purchase cost, and difficulty in tissue removal. KTP is characterised by longer operative time, lack of tissue for histologic evaluation, and cost including single-use fibres, especially in cases of larger adenomas. High-quality long-term data on the durability of KTP are still missing.     

Surgical training for anatomical endoscopic enucleation of the prostate

Anatomical endoscopic enucleation of the prostate has been proposed as a potentially superior benign prostatic hyperplasia surgery than conventional transurethral resection of prostate. However, the learning curve of the procedure is steep, hence limiting its generalisability worldwide. In order to overcome the learning curve, a proper surgical training is extremely important. This review article discussed about various aspects of surgical training in anatomical endoscopic enucleation of the prostate. In summary, no matter what surgical technique or energy modality you use, the principle of anatomical enucleation should be followed. When one starts to perform prostate enucleation, a 50 to 80 g prostate appears to be the ‘best case’ to begin with. Mentorship is extremely important to shorten the learning curve and to prevent drastic complications from the procedure. A proficiency-based progression training programme with the use of simulation and training models should be the best way to teach and learn about prostate enucleation. Enucleation ratio efficacy is the preferred measure for assessing skill level and learning curve of prostate enucleation. Morcellation efficiency is commonly used to assess morcellation performance, but the importance of safety rather than efficiency must be emphasised.